Nice video mate. It's based on the assumption that we do live in a heliocentric system though. You observations could be explained with all kinds of theories, that doesn't make any of the correct or incorrect. The bottom line for me is that there is no detectable curve which proves that we do not live on a globe. Then it's about finding potential flaws in the HC model; we could debate it endlessly to no avail; external truth is non existent - it's impossible to prove anything. So I make videos to get people to think and question for themselves and find out if their internal truth tells them something other than what the external environment does. Good luck with your mission brother you have a lot of energy which is a blessing. Peace on the plane.
its not based on any assumptions.. the example i show is one of the many proofs that we orbit the sun, our ancestors didnt have all this fancy equipment we have today, the relied on good old fashion observations and geometry.. the movement of the constellations in relation to our sun could not be explained with any theory on a stationary earth, the angle at which we view the stars from different points on earth could not be explained with any theory on a flat earth... the assumption wasnt that we lived on a globe, the assumption was that the earth was flat and stationary and at the center of the universe... there are many many observations that prove without a shadow of a doubt that the earth is in motion... hight alt balloons show plenty of curve without fisheyed lenses, high alt balloons sent up by flat earthers showed undeniable curve... i have no problem questioning the so called facts, it healthy and i look foward to your videos as i look forward to being proven wrong.. if ppl were always right we would never advance...
I didn't assume anything.. I simple explained a model that he had wrong... that's the issue with you guys, you constantly attack strawman earth.. his explaination was wrong, he clearly doesn't know what the model says.. again im not assuming anything, im simply explaining how the model works....
How many times do we have to explain this :(
Nice video mate. It's based on the assumption that we do live in a heliocentric system though. You observations could be explained with all kinds of theories, that doesn't make any of the correct or incorrect. The bottom line for me is that there is no detectable curve which proves that we do not live on a globe. Then it's about finding potential flaws in the HC model; we could debate it endlessly to no avail; external truth is non existent - it's impossible to prove anything. So I make videos to get people to think and question for themselves and find out if their internal truth tells them something other than what the external environment does.
Good luck with your mission brother you have a lot of energy which is a blessing.
Peace on the plane.
its not based on any assumptions.. the example i show is one of the many proofs that we orbit the sun, our ancestors didnt have all this fancy equipment we have today, the relied on good old fashion observations and geometry.. the movement of the constellations in relation to our sun could not be explained with any theory on a stationary earth, the angle at which we view the stars from different points on earth could not be explained with any theory on a flat earth... the assumption wasnt that we lived on a globe, the assumption was that the earth was flat and stationary and at the center of the universe... there are many many observations that prove without a shadow of a doubt that the earth is in motion...
hight alt balloons show plenty of curve without fisheyed lenses, high alt balloons sent up by flat earthers showed undeniable curve...
i have no problem questioning the so called facts, it healthy and i look foward to your videos as i look forward to being proven wrong.. if ppl were always right we would never advance...
Where's the curvature show me curvature on the piece of paper...
You are starting a war lol.
oh ive been arguing with them for over a year.. its a hobby...
Lol
Your assuming we live on a globe...assumptions
I didn't assume anything.. I simple explained a model that he had wrong... that's the issue with you guys, you constantly attack strawman earth.. his explaination was wrong, he clearly doesn't know what the model says.. again im not assuming anything, im simply explaining how the model works....