Why Are T 90 Tanks Losing the War in Ukraine
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 03. 2024
- The T90, built on the bones of the T-72, inherited some of its older sibling's design flaw: storing ammunition alongside the crew in the turret's carousel autoloader. This contrasts with Western tanks, where shells reside in safer, separate compartments. This seemingly minor detail creates a deadly vulnerability.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv - Věda a technologie
I'm pretty sure the Russian T-90 tanks are not "losing the war in Ukraine"
Likely a Typing mistake of Headline.. It should b WHY LEOPARD, CHALLENGER ,ABRAM TANKS, HIMARS,PATRIOTS MISSILE SYSTEMS, and 10 years of Arming - training of Ukranian by Nato elite soldiers & 100s billion dollars of arms n Aid Failed
Forget about sophiscated T- 90 tanks.. Even Soviet era T- 70tanks DESTROYED Abram Tank in Duel recently !!!
@@dennischingpen-gs5zn Stop pulling shit out of your arse, a T-70 has never destroyed an abrams. The fact that the 3 day special military operation has turned into a 2 year full blown war, is evidence that the NATO training and arming of Ukraine has worked. Think before speaking, its not that hard.
Copium channel 😁
@@dennischingpen-gs5zn Abrams was literally designed to fight out against T70s and T90s. Russian tanks are basically cheap and glorified. Or should we forget about the plastic airsoft helmets given to Russians. Or the the fact that Russians are literally surrendering in mass since the war started.
why are all tanks losing the war makes more sense.Drones ISR targeting help ATGMS.looks like unmanned smaller means more effective in the future in silent swarm electric drive
If we put any other tank in place of the T-90, we would obtain the same observation. The weapon that is the tank is no longer such a decisive weapon in a contemporary conflict context where drones, anti-tank weapons and satellites are omnipresent. The only difference is that the Russians have more tanks than the others.
” the Russians have more tanks than the others” - this is power in war times.
@@georgepopa1674 Was right in the last WWII. And it worked also for Shermans!
@@cosmincasuta486 still works today
what is better, cheap and easy to make t-90 or expensive leopards and abrams?
What worked in WWII does not work in modern warfare.
@@kaijenkins4513 I don't know if I have to laugh or be horified by the 1d10cy of the western buf00ns! A lot of westerners thught exactelly the same in 1941! They ended dead!
You can make "trendy and click bait" titles but we know the truth. The T-90 was barely deployed until recently. The T-72 was the most prominent tank at the onset. Dont give me this bs video. Challenger, leopard, abrams and all other tanks failed the same. This channel is starting to suck.
The t90 can only reverse at 4km an hour. It actually has the same reverse gear as the t72. Although cheaper, when in a minefield or fight with a convoy. The slow back up speeds hold the convoy up making them easy targets.
Three abrams lost so far. Everyone says one. But it’s 3 possibly 4. The basic truth is.
With the advancement of squad based anti tank weapons, drones, and massive minefields… tanks are not the warhorses that they used to be.
Ukraine also doesn’t not use tanks the same way. Defenders will always have an advantage. You can dig in and prepare.
The T-72 has been slaughtered over and over again. It has an autoloader in the turret, and the shell complement is kept there. Tap the turrent, and everything inside goes "Boom!" The Russians did not solve that problem, in fact they repeated it.
@@thinkerly1ok
@@thinkerly1 Well. First im not simping for Russian tanks. 2nd. The T-90 is basically an improved T-72. The current best tank on the front lines at the monet in quantity is the T-80BVM. Regardless, all tanks are being destroyed.
Why do you get so emotional when someone criticizes Russia or their military? Why do you respond to criticism like that? Have you ever asked yourself that? What is going on within you, that makes you so attached to Russia and their success? That you get emotionally angry and react with frustration when someone mentions anything bad about Russia? If I were you, I would try to understand that motivation within yourself in order to balance myself and grow as a human.
Every tank can burn . No matter eastern or western . It is foolish to think they are indestructible.
Low profile, good chassis or safe ammo compartment...all that is nothing if AP shell is fired .
Even a single , old rpg7 can be dangerous
Just remember our challengers didn’t fair well neither did any western equipments
😂😂😂
so much bs.
@@hanshuber1875 have a look . Type in challenger in Ukraine , look up the leopard then look at these Abrahams 🤨 nothing survives in Russia only Russians do ! Read russias history and it’s amazing like Britain in the 1500s
@@hanshuber1875 check up western equipment in Ukraine you’ll see our litter all over Ukraine .
Check up British litter in Ukraine it’s everywhere . Our indestructible challenger proved to be a lie
Yesterday Abrams M1 fired by T72 🤡
😂😂😂🤦♂️
@@Mike_Davidson You i.d.i.o.t, just Google the video. You know how to use Google, don't you, Mr. Smiley Face?
WOW really? Russians destroyed Abrams for the first time in history?
@@Rafe960 Yes.
@@Rafe960 Well, that's the first time they encounter.
Recently there was a rare tank-on-tank encounter between Abrams and T-72 B3M. Old Soviet tank dispatched American marvel of technology with one shot.
If you say so. 🤦♂😂😂😂😂
@@Mike_Davidson haven't heard yet?? That was the 5th Abrams blown up.
@@Mike_Davidson but it's true. american tanks burn like german tanks.
@@user-yn6zs5te7q And Russian tanks detonate like tactical nukes. 🤦♂😂😂😂
@@ryszardrakowski2711 evidence? I count three at this time.
Let's do a little math.
Today marks 744 days since the start of the war. According to this video, 57 T90s have already been lost, which gives an average of 1 tank every 13.05 days on a front of more than 1000 km.
The invasion of Iraq occurred between March 20 and May 1, 2003, it lasted 44 days and they lost 31 Abrams which means 1 Abrams lost every 1, 31 days....the Iraqis did not have Javelin, no mines, no drones, they were not trained by NATO, did they have not Starlink, ect, ect, ect......🤔🤔🤔😂😂😂
Where did you get 31 Abrams lost in the invasion of Iraq? It’s 31 Abrams deployed to Ukraine.
The Abrams are an over rated piece of junk..
The funny thing about your numbers is the amount of time involved. The Russians were helping Hussain. Didnt do him much good. At the end of the 6 week time-period that you give for Iraq, allied forces primarily American held the entire country, occupying Bagdad, and Hussein was dead. The Russians have been in Ukraine for ten years now (744 days is from the start of the second invasion; the first began on 18 February 2014) and they hold 19% of the country. The Russians have never been able to secure all of Donetsk and Lugansk Oblasts, which they invaded that 18th February 2014.
Iraqi Shepards Blasted Abram tanks in Iraq with hand made grenades.
@@thinkerly1 wait...this war is not about occupation but about wearing down the enemy until they have no choice but to surrender. The opinion of inexperienced and ignorant people says nothing about the course of the war, which Russia has won despite what is being published against it.
Did you get paid to make a 180°? What happend to u?
😅😁😁😂
Amen. Used to be pro Russia now he's just paid propaganda
He was always pro western.
@@ObeyNoLies it's not pro-West if you look at it objectively.
So the statements in the video are correct.
Every country sets different standards when it comes to tank construction and there is none that is indestructible, only one that comes close to meeting their own requirements!
The moment he mentioned oryx I clicked off the video. If you know you know
No matter how formidable a tank, any tank, it is easily destroyed by drones, and very often the first time.
In two years of war, 57 tanks is almost nothing…
Russia has lost 2500 other tanks though. 🤷♂😂😂😂
proof?@@Mike_Davidson
@@user-qt1qh1hp7g It’s all over CZcams. Russias 2nd Air Force is its flying tank turrets. 🤷🏻♂️😂😂
@@user-qt1qh1hp7g Oryx. Watch the pictures and videos yourself.
any proof clown?..@@Mike_Davidson
Losing the war is a bit exaggerated, or does the term losing in Ukrainian mean winning? that would explain a lot 😂
They aren’t exactly winning. Ukraine is doing a good job of holding them back. As long they keep getting supplied weapons and equipment from the west.
Ukraine is winning, if russia is not. its so simple.
@@hanshuber1875 At the moment, Russia is winning, it's that simple.
@@Yevgeny_N No they dont ivan. Go home you are drunk and lying. Like always, russia lies. Nothing changed since the USSR, but lying all the time doenst change reality.
The term winning in this context means Russia leaving Ukraine. Ukraine does not need to occupy Russia. Let the Russians stew in their own vodka.
Drones have become dominant. Main battle tanks and attack helicopters are becoming too costly and less relevant.
Multi-purpose helos are still useful. You can stick a couple wing stubs for hardpoints on a transport chopper--It's nice to have them but don't expect to rely on them.
Are you living in another dimension, just the other day, Abram tank was blown by a Russian tank.
No it was destroyed by several kornets not a t72.
It was a kornet, not a t72
Five days later and now 4 confirmed Abrams kaput.
@@peterc4955 the 4th one has 0 evidence. The other 3 do
So what. It is war. A t72 has a gun and shells that will take out an Abrams if they get the drop on them. They did. Just like Bradleys neutralised a T90. Hundred or more T90s lost and thousands of t72s and only 1 Challenger, single figure Abrams and dozen or so Leopards.
Ah! yes... the Challenger, Leopard and M1 Abrams have been a real game changer.. indestructible and invincible with their perfect design and top tier protection system..... while every Russian equipment is riddled with flaws and weaknesses
Thats the european narrative i,m afraid.
😂😂what a mock
Western Europe hypothesis
Pootin is tactical military strategic genius! More meat for the market
Yes because Russians only fight with shovels strapped on a washing machine 😂
They are not losing they have the best ejecting turrets in this war doesn't anyone realize these are highly trained cosmaunauts manning these machines
PR much? What are you smoking?
Copium. They realize the strategy to raise up Ukraine as a threat to Russia has massively backfired, with huge strategic and economic ramifications. Hard times are coming.
The Abrams ammunition’s stowage makes it far more vulnerable to drones.
T90s have seen more combat than any other tanks they are battle proven platforms
Not bad tanks except for pop top design,slow reverse speed and crew survivability issues. However, lost over a hundred and a lot of crews.
Russia is taking Ukrainian fortified positions and you say Russia is losing? You need to stop coping
Gee, it only took you TWO YEARS to take Adivka. You call that winning? 19% of Ukraine after 10 years? Winning? Pathetic.
@@thinkerly1 it only took Ukraine 150 billion dollars foreign funding and NATO coalition just to drag the conflict. They didn't even take 1℅ land in the counteroffensive
@@suryanshsagar2773 Hey Ukraine is fighting for their freedom and independence, for their people's hope for a better future.
Meanwhile Russia is fighting so hard to maintain their role as a killer of woman and children, a shithole country that throws away the lives of 10's of thousands just so they can kill their neighbors and ravage their lands.
Man being a Russian must suck.
@@suryanshsagar2773 you know that Russia has already spent times more or you're just Putler puppet?
@@suryanshsagar2773 They liberated most of the lost provinces, what the fuck are you talking about?
Wow... the title is serious BS
Not going to mention how a t72 just 1 hit an Abrams? 😂😂
fr they actin all tough with their abrams when the ""russian sophisticated armour" outdated soviet tanks can 1 shot leos and abrams its not abt tanks its abt crew
Good point, the T72 entered service 50 years ago. It was the best tank in the world for years and any infantryman or tank commander knows better than to underestimate them. That is always the mistake of Armchair Generals, like the ones who got us out of 3rd world Vietnam, Iraq & Afghanistan with the last U.S. soldier backing up the ramp of a C-5A holding an M16, praying not to be the last American to die there.
ye also export version of t72 was less armored without internal composite and without firing control laser range finder and era@@erichkorman710
That was a Kornet. Russia is all yap. And that ‘video’ is not an Abrams, they done blow up like that or look like tgat
@GavinAkers-mg4nd Nonsense. I have seen the video was 100% a Abrams
From an Engineers perspective, the auto loader seems the way to go. If well designed this would be quicker, more reliable and compact than a manual system. Also, despite, what this video presents, having the ammo located deep in the bowels of the machine makes it much less vulnerable to a top down attack.
CAN YOU SHOW US 3 DESTROYED TANK ABRAMS? OR IT IS SECRET? ...
Play dead strategy 😂
It's Russian propaganda. If the Russians had a whole bunch of killed Abrams, they would be trumpeting the video on their nightly news, and Putin would have mentioned it. But there is nothing, because the story, told by Russian propagandists, is a lie.
Why leopads and Abrahams also lose?
The reactive armour of T90 is very effective. we saw that 2 Bradleys wasn't able to destroy a blinded T90 Tank. The separate compartment of Abraham for ammunition on the top is actually a weak point and its is so thin that it is not providing any protection for crew. T90 store ammunition very low and thats make it difficult to hit critically.
That’s pretty embarrassing tbh. How is a Bradley taking out a T 90? A Bradley is just an APC lmao
any tanks lose a modern war, be it American or British or some other. However, I saw footage when an old Soviet tank with an installed electronic warfare station avoided an attack by 5 drones, so it’s more likely a matter of adequate reconnaissance, support and good electronic warfare
Because it is total warfare all tanks are just as vulnerable as each other.
Not true "Scarface". Abrams and Challengers have a very good change of surviving a hit from a Russian tank or ATGM. Even if their tank is knocked out the crew from a NATO-made tank has a good survival rate. Trained veteran crews are a huge asset and are the real difference between an effective tank and a moving target.
3 out of 4 deployed in combat Abrams are destroyed... so 75% losss.
31 deployed
31 deployed
"in combat""@@kaijenkins4513
Sure, and just like the HIMARS that you have said every week for one and one-half years, you wiped them all out and -- voila! -- they suddenly reincarnate. You dummies think that your words posted on mass media somehow change reality.
@@kaijenkins4513 31 Delivered
Isn't 15% in 2 years a low attrition rate in this type of war?
I thought the Abrams had a much higher attribute rate in a much shorter timespan? They were also protected by being held back away from the front line.
It is actually less than 15% and Russia produce more than that in 2 years.
Losing the war? Are you crazy
Not at all. Russia is far away from winning.
@@hanshuber1875 as a neutral observer I believe the tables have turned on the Ukrainians they were doing great at first
@@suleymansahin3770 they performing much better than the russians. There wont be a new offensive this year. They learned their lessons. Russia not, they will keep pushing and will take high losses, like in bachmut or adivvka. The russians only take minimal ground, during their economy is performing terrible. Last week, the further cut oil production and stopped exporting refined products.
bruh. Do you even know why Zenlensky dont post any Ukrainian casualty?
Yes of cause. Russia is losing the war !
It’s mostly the t90A tanks that are losing but the T90m
In every battle, tanks lose their status as an effective weapon... Look at what happens in Gaza with the Israeli Merkava when it faces a primitive weapon like the “Yassin” 105... and before it in the Lebanon War and the 1973 war... I do not expect tanks to continue as a weapon. In the coming modern battles...
It will always be needed in the battle field. Except it probably won’t be these large main battle tanks but smaller unmanned tanks that can still carry a big gun for infantry and anti armor support.
Israel hasnt lost a single tank in gaza, they were only damaged. Russia lost 3000 tanks in ukraine.
@@hanshuber1875 bro if the tank was easily taken out action then it ain’t doing nothing good for the battlefield. Sure they might be able to fix it up but that takes a lot of time and resources.
@@JP-qb3ny taken out? have you seen the videos? They did what they were build to do. They protected the crew.
@@hanshuber1875 yeah that’s what a good tank is suppose to do (except Russian tanks), but if it’s easily taken out by small teams with anti tank weapons then it starts becoming more a liability then a valuable asset.
Man you forgot about Leopards and Abrams lmao
Any tank is a consumable, even with Trophy APS. Nothing can save you from a 152mm adjustable shell like Excalibur, not to mention FPV drones. And at the beginning of the war, the Russians even spent Iskanders on tanks.
- 3 Abrams in one week... "T-90 losing"
Ivan, how many tanks have you lost since 24 February 2022? I have seen numbers between 1200 and 2700. What numbers do you have? For the slaughter on the Sikivka Highway between 24 February 2022 and 8 March 2022, I have seen numbers between 200 and 400. What numbers do you have?
@@thinkerly1 it's a war, the ucranians paid for the destruccion of those tanks with their blood, by the same logic, hamas is winning against Israel, becuase Israel has lost a lot of tanks, while hamas has lost none....
It called COPIUM
@@thinkerly1 there was only 31 abrams sent 3 lost in a week is a lot more than percentage wise than what Russia loses a week
Videos is just a propaganda. Abrams have been destroyed, as well as UK's Challender2, any tank can be destroyed
the more propaganda the more sign the Nato is losing its marbles,
plz MORE PROPAGANDA
Yea like 2 or 3 nato tanks while Russia has lost a shit load lol
@@eddiethatch5060 put the same number of tanks into the war zone as Russian. It won't be of much difference. 😅
No American tank has been lost in Ukraine and two Challengers have been disabled by mines and then recovered.
@@bullettube9863 5 abrams has been lost
Even if we take your numbers at face value, you have to take into account the fact that A. The Russians are repairing and salvaging tanks by sending them to 'tank hospitals' near the front, or sending them back to be rebuilt. B. The Russians are building some 250 new build tanks per year. C. Their opponents do not possess either of these capabilities.
We should probably ask why are the Abrams tanks loosing in Ukraine?The supposed indestructible tank that has never been destroyed in combat?
Losing ??? Hahaha steadily moving forward isn’t what I call losing boys
He loses because he is the best 😆
Could you do a video on the Agm 86 vs Kh 55
Today photos emerged from blown-up Abrams (by Russian Kornet ATGM), another Challenger (blew off its turret) and another Leopard 2A6 (blew off its turret and completey exploded). So all tanks explode just the same when hit by Russian ammunition. There are just way more T90 tanks on the battlefield than the handful of western tanks.
You think the Ukraine Nazis are winning?
😂🤣😂🤣
come on, before russia talked about a nazi regime in ukraine, no one ever heard such a bs. And nazi lead by a jew. thats so wrong. You simply believe cheap russian propaganda. And when did the russians became a trustworthy source? They lie all the time. for decades at least.
The Ukrainians were and never can be NAZIs because like you Russians the NAZIs consider them (and you) untermenschen, that is, subhuman. Zelenskiy is an ethnic Russian Jew, so no, there "Ukraine Nazis" are not winning because they do not exist. Do Ukrainians hate you? Absolutely. You've killed millions over the centuries. Every Russian schoolboy learns about Pugachev and the other uprisings against the Russians. Why? Because you were, and are, brutal dictators.
Have you seen the burning Leopards and Abrams tanks on the battlefield? They usually get taken out hours after they show up, giving us a better idea of what is happening. After all, it is easy to see a burning tank in a war where hundreds fight every day. The trick is to figure out the percentage lost and why the tanks were destroyed. From what I have observed, Russia seems to have won this war, and there is no way for Ukraine to change the inevitable. The only question is how many brave Ukrainians will be sacrificed in a proxy war that has destroyed the EU economies and seems to be showing the fractures within NATO.
I don't know, man, looks like a stalemate
IMO Nato is scoping for a way out that is not completely humiliating and I for one cannot think of any.
@@kaimanwhite8763 It is because you look at how much territory is won and lost. That is however not the only way to win. Russia is slowly but surely exausting the Ukranian army and production. And that is really all Russia have to do to win. There is no way Ukraine can ever get the resources to turn is around.
@oletoustrup8572 Sure, but the losses aren't worth it.
@@kaimanwhite8763 What do you mean ?
They're like the old Ronson lighters add, “lights first every time.”
A machine is only as useful as the crew that mans it.
Why all NATO equipment losing war in UE ;)
Why are M1A2 Abrams Tanks Losing the war in Ukraine yesterday?
There are no m1a2s in ukraine. Only 50 year old m1a1s.
ahhahaha broski every tank in ukraine is 70 yr old 1950 soviet design tanks comanded by unecxperianced paid soldiers@@Someguy12796
Ramping up production requires not just metal resources, but humans, electronics and engines. It also requires trained operators. As many of the human resources are fighting, there are fewer skilled people to produce the tank. If they are making more, they are even of lower quality than the ones they are losing on the battlefield. The troops operating them are even less experienced than the lost crews, and that's a lot of troops.
Hey, do you know what is a fab 1500 bomb?
A bomb smaller than the upcoming Fab 3000.
So Russia Is Loosing By advancing forward lol
And 🇺🇦 is winning by being in complete ruins!!!
@@niblet112 Poor Ukrainians got scammed into complete distruction .I wonder if it has something to do With "Biden's Ukraine Gate ".....
@@JohnCSmith-lp1qr metabiota!!!!
Ah yes, Russia is "loosing" just as much as you know English grammar.
@@thinkerly1 oh no not the grammar!!!! 🤣 losing just as much you know English grammar??? That makes absolutely no sense 😂 but thanks for the laugh
NATO says Russia is weak, but at the same time, they say Russia will take over Europe. Warmongering hypocrites!
NATO meanwhile they say is strong but at the same time wants more and more allies to be secured.
They say NATO is a defensive alliance but attacked Iraq, Libya and Syria unprovoked
You forgot 🇷🇺 also has space nukes, whilst they only have shovels left
Russia is obviously weak. YOu have been fighting the world's 22nd largest army, you with 28 times the country and 4 times the population and 10 times the military, and you have 19% of Ukraine, after ten years. Pathetic. Disgusting.
Very unconvincing "explanation". One can see from the illustrations that in the 3 Western tanks, the shells sit directly behind the heads of the men. If an anti-tank missile penetrates through the side or back of the turret, which is temptingly big and elevated, it will ignite them. How is this arrangement of the ammunition safer? And the shells are taken by hand from an open internal hatch-door. This is safe? The initial placement predetermines other non-optimal solutions - the much bigger size, the additional weight of the armor needed to envelop the enlarged volume, bigger fuel tanks for the bigger weight, shorter distances before refuelling, much higher center of gravity...
It's funny that you forgot to mention a T72 recently took out an M1 in Ukraine 🤔
Ooo! One! Wow.
Western campaign...
The T 90 is like the T 34 easy and quick to build . In a month you can have 200/400 of these ! That’ leaves us in the dust !
Propaganda aside, "Quantity has a quality all its own"...
@@iossysm all lies aside Russia outproduced the entire west in WW2 . Do you not think they are ready for us ? We got nothing in the uk . We are selling off our navy 🤣🤣🤣
@@iossysmall jokes aside we in the uk are selling our navy so we are finished . We have LGTBQ THO ?
@@iossysmmy comments are getting removed . Seems I can’t tell you the truth . Research British navy and if you got the cash you can purchase an aircraft carrier. 🤣🤣
@@user-qv2pi7hk5c telling the truth? you mean you spread russian lies and propaganda.
the transmission is responsible for the slow reverse speed .
Masive numbers in production may not be the solution to their problems, the crews are forced not to think in combat areas, but to shoot at will and get the hell out of the zone to preserve their own survival and keep fighting in better circunstances or in time frame where the possibility to win presents itself under less streessing battles.
Nice propaganda
The racist Russians are all over this thread
"Losing the war"....?....;))
Really funny!!
Please get informed what propaganda can do and what not....;)))))
Russian propagand: "3-Day Special Military Operation". In Russia, if you try and call this tragedy a war, you will be arrested.
15/20% loss are not specially high for such conflict. . Leopards are destroyed too. Bradleys too.
Says the invincible Abrams and Challengers that were supposed to reach Crimea last year.
Losing the war?😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Ukraine propagand😂😂
Why did Russia announce last week that it would stop exporting gas?
@thinkerly1 Наверно потому что вы уже какой там пакет санкций наложили?😂
Yes, Russia has lost the war the day it started.
@@arandomfinnin1941 Bla bla bla🥱🥱🥱🥱
@@therevenant..1478 Aww, how's the 3 day special military operation going? Why are you guys begging North Korea and Iran for ammunition? Why are you guys celebrating taking a few villages with very spectacular losses? Why are you guys celebrating the loss of 3 Abrams when all you had for victory parade last year was an old T-34? Why are you opposing NATO's so called "expansion" if NATO is so weak? Yada yada, you're a vatnik.
Are you for real mate !... Looks like your videos are from another universe in the multiverse 🤣🤣.. Leopard tanks - Invincible but one blow from T90 and its legacy is dead... Challenger 2 tanks - NO Challenger 2 tank ever lost in action since put into service ONE blow from T90 and the Challenger2 fades from the battlefield forever .... Abraham M1 tank - Indestructible, worlds most advance tanks which has been the working horse in all American invasions with ZERO losses however ONE blow from T90 tank and the Abraham M1 gets crushed like a can 🤣🤣.. and yet according to you T90 tank is loosing in Ukraine 🤣🤣.. One has to be Biden or Zelensky to believe your narrative 🤣🤣🤣
you are telling so much bs. There never was battle between a T90 a western tanks.
@@hanshuber1875he’s on that Z dust😂
Sure, Ivan, ad you think that your words can invaent reality. Why are you ten years into a 3-Day Special Military Operation?
@@hanshuber1875 well in that case i suppose The Challengers 2 , Leopard and the Abraham tanks just burnt due to spontaneous combustion 🤣🤣🤣
@@kaijenkins4513 well the same dust on which Joe Biden keeps slipping while climbing stairs 🤣🤣
When crew forget on sora systems 💀
Notice almost ALL of the drone kills we see are armored vehicles without anti drone cope cages. Those cages work well for what they are. They wouldn't still be making them if they weren't effective.
Dude stop bullshitting, reverse speed of T-90 is 15km/h not 4.
but nato are losing the war ...... period
nato is not at war idio*
No, Ivan, and your grammar is not good. Study ingrish
Well they started it, a can of whoopass they shall get.
@@user-op3zf6if9i Thats bs Ivan and you know that. Lying doesnt change reality, you should remember that. The USSR collapsed and russia will too.
@@user-op3zf6if9i yup nato ain't gota chance
where can i buy your drones!
now dont get me wronge i dont do politics but the abrams hasnt been used in a large woodland combat conflict or against drones so its hard to tell how it would fair
And then the surviving crew gets taken out by drones, as we've seen numerous times.
Tanks appear to have become increasingly obsolete, instead drones and long range precision firepower is taking over.
I think the tank design with the shell carousel at its current location is a major flaw for the Russian tanks. I believe the T14 has moved away from this design.
You are a fine parrot.
In a tank you need to keep your frontal armour facing the enemy, showing your rear end to the enemy will end in disaster.
29 февраля парламент ЕС принял резолюцию о развале России. «За» расчленение России, как цель политики Евросоюза, проголосовало 506 депутатов, 9 - "против" и 32 воздержались.
Они решили подарок Путину сделать? Это же явная угроза существованию России, это на 100% подпадает под условие использованию ЯО и является прекрасным объяснением третьим странам, почему образовалась радиоактивная пустыня вместо Запада
an objective report.
But everyone should remember two things:
- a tank always consists of pros and cons
- During development, priorities are set and compromises always have to be made.
Every country sets its own standards.
This means that all Russian tanks and similar models retain the advantages of the flat design and the better HP/t ratio.
To achieve this, the protection of the crew was sacrificed to a large extent compared to Western tank construction.
That's exactly what was said correctly in the video.
Manned by new crew without synergised interoperability with all Arms. Standalone pillboxes are easily neutralized piecemeal.
Very Briefed And Summarized Ideas :
the overall performance of Russian tanks are improved compared to previous wars and military conflicts...
regarding the t90 platform, the most important are the t90m and t90ms, while in Ukrainian theaters of operations judging the survivability and the overall performance of the remaining versions of the t90 tanks can be compared to the latest versions of the t72b3 object 2016 and the t80bvm tanks.
I think that most losses are a mixture of everything :
1- designing flaws inherited from the t64 and t72 in terms of :
A- the location of the ammunition storage, worth noting most of the destruction occurs due to the explosion of the propellant ammunition and the HEAT rounds...
Although, in reality, given the time period in which the t64 and t72 were designed in , all the ammunitions was distributed between the tank’s hull and its turret, while the integration of the autoloader was a technological breakthrough and forward thinking allowed the Soviet army to reduce the tanks crew to three, even though the design did not take into account the threat's presented by the anti-armor landmines, and this is clear even in some cases footage of the catastrophic destruction of the most modern t90m/ms walking over anti tank landmines...
B- the side armor of the tank’s hull is devoid of reactive armor blocks, and the focus was on equipping the tank sideways with Nera armor, this is in contrast to the widely employed t72b series, which was equipped with kontakt1 armor on the sides of its hull, actually from t72av the sideways of the tank was equipped with explosive reactive armor side armor...
2- the absence of hard-kill systems from equipments list of the Russian armor fighting vehicles AFVs mainly tanks especially the elite guard formations, and this is very surprising for two reasons :
A- most of the Russian armored formations entered Ukrainian territory were devoid of foot infantry to accompany those tanks, meaning there were not sufficient numbers of infantry to accompany the tanks, most ifvs were either tracked like the bmp1/2/3 or wheeled like the btr80/82 and apcs like the mltb It did not carry sufficient numbers of infantry soldiers, and the small number that were inside those afvs did not disembark from their carriers, and therefore there were no safety restrictions preventing the usage of hard-kill systems...
B-the need to test the efficiency and effectiveness of combat equipment, in addition to refining the tactical and operational employment of the military hardware against a wide spectrum of various weapon's and ammunition, especially western origins anti-armor weapons systems, especially those that employing the top attack pattern...
before the Russian invasion of Ukraine began or the special operation, I expected that the duels would be between the hard-killing systems equipped the high-end Russian tanks and between anti-armor weapons, especially western ones, mainly the javelin and nelo, here must rely on technology to compensate for the lack of use of traditional means such as infantry soldiers...
regarding the t90a copy or model, the tank witnessed its first combat use in the syrian theaters of operations and gradually proved itself, albeit with varying rates of success, but in general, and over a period of use that extended for a few consecutive years in the front lines, the t90a as a modern main battle tank demonstrated good survivability rates, coupled with advanced day and night fighting capabilities...
I believe the issue does not reflect on the Tank itself. We need to look at doctrine, training, and logistical failings.
for me the blast door is the key feature..which it doesn't have unlike the Leaopard/Abrams have. Yes, an autoloader is faster..but..your pretty done like a kipper if you get a hit. Don't really see a swarm of Stuka Bombers having a go..all you see is something bought of Amazon, slightly modified,then dropping granades and popping the top.
Pretty much they've been getting there clock cleaned.
At first glance, this video shows the 'Zipperhead Army' clearing an anti-tank mine with a tank. 😂
dont forget to make an episode on the tin canes with a cannon...the abrams
The main problem of the russian tanks is the tourette wich is wrong designed, apart from the wrong storage of the ammo location.
They should make the tank tourette to be rounded between tank base and tourette, that space between tank base and the tourete makes the explosions to brake up the tourette and affects everything inside, the upper side of the tank and the mid side should fit lean rounded, so when they get hit they resist more to the damage
They have also done videos on western tanks being destroyed also.
From what time are that picture of destroyed tanks?TODAY,MODIFICATION?
Abrams, Bradleys, leopards, challengers are great sources of scrap metals in Ukraine 😅
Western Tanks has 70-KPH forward and 45-KPH reverse.
Japan Type-10 has 70KPH reverse and forward
T-90's are the poor mans version of the M1 Abrams!
Where are the T-14's?
It's a flying tank, alright.
Lmao.. we're blurring people that aren't even dead or injured yet, now? Lmao
Any tank caught in a bad situation is vulnerable,
First of all, a lot of comments are way off the mark. The tank is not outdated or obsolete in any way, shape or form. Both sides have been able to conduct successful mechanized and armored operations, in Ukraine's case on a grand scale back when they retook large swathes of territory in eastern Ukraine. However, what we have also seen is that both sides bog down and suffer heavy losses when they outrun friendly air defense systems. What we have also seen is the need for a layered anti-air system that includes both medium/long range systems as well as mobile SHORAD (short-range air defense) that is capable of keeping pace with maneuver units. This is hardly new and in fact goes back to the heyday of the tank in World War II when all sides worked very hard to develop mobile, SPAA to cover their advancing armored formations.
Secondly, it is very difficult to assess the capability of any singular piece of military equipment. There are too many other factors that go into a system's battlefield performance such as crew training, logistical support, maintenance frequency, skill of maintenance crews, etc. All of these will dramatically impact a system's effectiveness or render it completely ineffective. In Russia's case, the privatization of its military logistics (done some years ago) has severely hampered logistical support and maintenance for frontline units. Similarly, the reliance on poorly trained conscripts reduces the effectiveness of any system they operate. Added to that are the outlandish claims of Russian propaganda (which insist that anything Russian is the best that ever was and will be), which further muddies the waters.
Meanwhile, the NATO equipment matched up against the Russians is being used largely outside its doctrinal context. NATO doctrine, built heavily around US capabilities, emphasizes air power and methodical build-up of air assets before launching operations to gain air superiority, if not air dominance. For example, Ukraine's failed counter-offensive would likely never have happened in a NATO-led military (which is ironic given that it was NATO politicians clamoring for it). NATO commanders would almost certainly refuse a suicidal assault into a defense-in-depth where the enemy maintains air superiority (and with very good reason, said offensive was doomed before it started). Thus, even years into this conflict, it remains incredibly hard to actually gauge the effectiveness of individual systems.
The T-90 was a soviet era designed vehicle designed to take on late model M60 Pattons, first production model Abrams, Challenger 1s, and Early model Leopard 2a4s... They where not designed to take roof attacking munitions such as FPV drones, Kamikaze drones, Javelins, and modern armor such as M1A1, Leopard 2A6 and STRV-122B, as well as ambush tactics deployed by Ukrainian Bradley crews and Excalibur 155 GPS guided artillery rounds. No Russian designed tank is safe from modern western munitions. Also recently Russia bragged about knocking out 2 Abrams tanks and capturing a destroyed one, well the crews of those tanks lived to fight another day, i can't say the same for the Russian crews that get hit.
The T-72/80/90 are about as good or bad as a Leopard 2 or M1 in an environment with so many drones.
I think the drones are about to put an end to tank warfare.
I just saw yesterday how T-72B3 destroy with one shot Western Tank Abrams. So i really don't think that TY-90 is losing some thing.
Everything got destroyed. Challenger, leopard, Abrams, T90, T72.
15%-30% from original 400, in 2 years isnt as bad as it seems specially if they are producing more to replace those losses. Tanks will be lost regardless if they are T-90, Abrams, Leopards or Challengers, what matter is whenever they do fulfill their role of MBT and whenever you can "tank" those losses. Russia is producing a ton more of those, and while i think 1000 new T-80 and T-90 per year is an exageration of their government its undeniable that they are quickly increasing production and most likely reach several hundreds per year already.
The production now is 30 new tanks per week (T72, T80 and T90).... But.... they have factories rebuilding T62s rfor the new front requirments! And T62s are zounds in reserve!!!!
@@cosmincasuta486 probably will serve as infantry support much like the t-54/55 are right now, or as a "beefed up" personal carrier/ APC. Israel, if i am not wrong, uses a t-55 chassis as a basis for their self-propelled artillery so maybe something similar.
I mean, sure they are old tanks, but they are still good pieces of steel that can fulfill certain roles in battle, and there are, like you said, zounds of them in stock. better than becoming rust.
@@Cloud43001 I do not know about T55, but T62s are fitted with new reactive armour, new optics and computers, were also rumors about new engines! And, again, numbers are winning battles! ALWAYS! Russians seem that understand this! The west???? I don't know, woke-ism is all over!
Most of the Russian tanks in the field were earlier models, especially the T-72. Perhaps twenty years of production has been destroyed.
@@thinkerly1 Perhaps 20 years of flawd specimens like you must be sent to Avdievka!
That’s Abrams tanks . And the challenger and leopards . Now all scrap metal