Top 10 Best Destroyers In The World | 2022

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 22. 05. 2024
  • In this video, we have examined the world's top 10 destroyers in the world
    VSB Defense is the world's first CZcams channel founded for the purpose of comparing military forces of different countries.
    We review and rank the military forces (armies; land forces, air forces, navy forces, special forces and more) of more than 100 countries in the light of recent news.
    In this channel we rank and review the best, most expensive, fastest, strongest military vehicles, weapons, equipments, aircrafts, helicopters, carriers, destroyers, tanks, rifles, submarines and more, in terms of technological advancement.
    We keep an eye on recent military matters and make videos on recent news.
    If you enjoy these kind of videos, do not forget to subscribe to VSB Defense!
    ------------------
    VSB defense
    ✪ Subscribe: goo.gl/Yw7h55
    --------------------------
    |Sources|
    military-today: Website about modern warfare, military equipment and defense technology
    wikipedia: Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation.
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 1,5K

  • @Hunt_GG
    @Hunt_GG Před 11 měsíci +35

    055即使装备有独步世界的射程1500公里的反舰高超音速导弹,那毕竟还是一艘中国的战舰,怎么能让中国战舰排第一呢?我看中国055能排第四也太抬举了,应该排十名开外!

  • @higgsboson9212
    @higgsboson9212 Před rokem +86

    China's 055 probably the most formidable destroyer, it is the only destroyer deploying 10 mach high speed anitship missile with range over 1000 miles.

    • @xutongling5077
      @xutongling5077 Před rokem +4

      of couse

    • @puppydude4308
      @puppydude4308 Před rokem +4

      No no no

    • @user-hj2dd5ou4r
      @user-hj2dd5ou4r Před 11 měsíci +3

      中国057等离子隐身驱逐舰传出在造了,196个垂发,满载排水量1.8万吨

    • @flx2463
      @flx2463 Před 2 měsíci +3

      🇰🇷+🇯🇵>🇨🇳

    • @user-vl9qk8ys5q
      @user-vl9qk8ys5q Před 2 měsíci

      @@flx2463日本有俄罗斯邻居,南北朝鲜也是邻居

  • @sk38962
    @sk38962 Před 2 lety +1

    Awesome!

  • @amos325
    @amos325 Před 2 lety +5

    Nice selection, I had a good laugh today

  • @leejack2478
    @leejack2478 Před 2 lety +68

    055 is better than Burke III, even US navy themselves understand it !

    • @hermesliteratus882
      @hermesliteratus882 Před rokem +9

      True, the US Navy openly admit it. And frankly, I wouldn't take the ranking of this video too seriously.

    • @TonyWang62
      @TonyWang62 Před rokem +9

      055 is the best now.

    • @user-qk7gk4ni5w
      @user-qk7gk4ni5w Před rokem +3

      我们是渔船,你们的是战舰

    • @user-qk7gk4ni5w
      @user-qk7gk4ni5w Před rokem +2

      @Russia🇷🇺 will nukke Porn#o West 是的呢,我们现在除了055,也只有另外三条带飞机的渔船了

    • @user-rj9vk9lw8v
      @user-rj9vk9lw8v Před 11 měsíci +1

      ​@@user-qk7gk4ni5w你是懂战忽局的

  • @stevegeorge5322
    @stevegeorge5322 Před 2 lety

    Well Done!

  • @cliffrunner
    @cliffrunner Před rokem +4

    I feel rankings like this are usually misleading in assumption that those destroyers are having a 1-1 battle. In fact, those destroyers are unlikely to act by themselves in a real battle.

  • @stardestroyer-ko9zb
    @stardestroyer-ko9zb Před 2 lety +3

    Nice boats!🚤

  • @anderskandersson4613
    @anderskandersson4613 Před 2 lety +27

    Maya Class is the latest and baddest of Japanese Navy JMSDF, currently 2 is in service.

    • @user-os2hl3fe5i
      @user-os2hl3fe5i Před rokem +4

      Talking about the comprehensive combat effectiveness is that China's 055 destroyer is the most powerful! No matter radar or stealth system, as well as the complete set of weapons! The Arleigh Burke class destroyers are all products of 40 years ago! 055 is a product after 2015. Your ranking itself is fair!! Obviously, there are double standards in the United States from the country to the people!! Where can there be notarization?? It's like taking a bag of washing powder to hit a country!

    • @dipayansaha4101
      @dipayansaha4101 Před rokem

      @@user-os2hl3fe5i what about new vishakhapattnam class destroyers ?
      Ins Visakhapatnam was commissioned in 2021 and ins murmugao will be commissioned in December 2022

    • @joshuaraewa-ay9684
      @joshuaraewa-ay9684 Před rokem +1

      @@dipayansaha4101 .....If I'm a buyer, I'll choose Renhai (Type 055) because all biases aside, it's the most gorgeous ship I've ever seen. No one can deny me that. And it's also a cruiser sized with large modules ready to be improved.
      Vishakapatnam is also an interesting choice for me, but I want a bigger Vishakapatnam, a cruiser sized before I can decide. But if you ask me between 052D and Vishakapatnam, I'll choose the latter.
      Anyway, biases aside, I would love to see more newer ships from Asia. Hope ASEAN can make its own version of destroyers.

    • @dipayansaha4101
      @dipayansaha4101 Před rokem +1

      @@joshuaraewa-ay9684 ins murmagao is coming

  • @danielluo7710
    @danielluo7710 Před 10 měsíci +3

    The only 055 with dual-band radar is behind a few old warships, hahahaha😂

  • @leesungsoon3745
    @leesungsoon3745 Před 2 lety

    Love this video youtube channel 😄👍

  • @4m33rsgame4
    @4m33rsgame4 Před 2 lety +24

    Wow nice editing on cn type 055 adding double gun 3 seahawk heli

  • @user-wr6el6gr4x
    @user-wr6el6gr4x Před 2 lety +260

    type 055 is a fishing boat,not warship.

    • @user-wr6el6gr4x
      @user-wr6el6gr4x Před 2 lety +15

      @Georgy Konstantinovich Zhukov that I agree.
      enemy.

    • @user-lt6ke9hg8f
      @user-lt6ke9hg8f Před 2 lety +18

      @Georgy Konstantinovich Zhukov
      Our 055 is used in fisheries. . There should be no place for him on this list.

    • @user-lt6ke9hg8f
      @user-lt6ke9hg8f Před 2 lety +31

      @@user-wr6el6gr4x
      这群老外真好笑

    • @mr.grinchee3277
      @mr.grinchee3277 Před 2 lety +15

      I agree with your profound analysis. Type 055 is for fishing boat or stealing fish from the sea of other country worldwide. They use a bomb or cannon gun to catch fish illegally.

    • @user-lt6ke9hg8f
      @user-lt6ke9hg8f Před 2 lety +7

      @@mr.grinchee3277

  • @Mr68486848
    @Mr68486848 Před 2 lety +33

    "AIKIZUKI" is misspelled.
    "AKIZUKI" is correct.
    There is no doubt that I am Japanese.

    • @anderskandersson4613
      @anderskandersson4613 Před 2 lety +2

      アキズキ あきづき 😁
      おはようございます
      コニチワ
      こんばんは

    • @Godzilla-lo2ii
      @Godzilla-lo2ii Před 2 lety +1

      @@anderskandersson4613 That nice!

    • @Mr68486848
      @Mr68486848 Před 2 lety +2

      @@anderskandersson4613
      sorry.
      You are right.
      AKIZUKI is wrong
      AKIDUKI is correct
      I'm not good at the alphabet....

    • @janusjones6519
      @janusjones6519 Před rokem +1

      nobody cares

    • @devicex14maxx
      @devicex14maxx Před rokem

      don't care

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 Před 2 lety

    I like this Destroyers

  • @veidorje1681
    @veidorje1681 Před 2 lety

    they are all called FREGATES nowdays thanks 4 sharing : )

  • @mingsong1491
    @mingsong1491 Před 2 lety +79

    Zumwalt=Type055 >Arleigh Burke III >Sejong > Atago > Type 052D >Kolkata >Kongon > 45 Type > Aikizuki

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 Před 2 lety +3

      Vishakapatnam is already in the house. So is Maya Class
      And they are above Atago if not Sejong.
      Areligh Burke III enters service in 2023. Block 2 is well inferior to Kolkata.
      Zumwalt > Type055 > Sejong> Maya >Vishakapatnam >Atago>Type52D>Kolkata > Arleigh Burke II > Horizon

    • @morchang624
      @morchang624 Před 2 lety +41

      Type055 is just a military fish boat, my friend.
      I know the U.S next-gen DDGX are trying to copy Type 055, but actually, you have to admit that the U.S navy just wants to catch up with the new fish boat trend and upgrade their fishing industry.

    • @mingsong1491
      @mingsong1491 Před 2 lety +9

      @@morchang624 Military fish boat,well,I love this nickname,It wasn't that long ago that I was worried about the US Empire forcing the fish boat down to the cruiser class, 😏. To Type055, the only problem is powerplant,it's electronics,even better than Zumwalt.

    • @mingsong1491
      @mingsong1491 Před 2 lety +1

      @@morchang624 The Washington Naval Treaty, 1922, a treaty signed in Washington, D.C., between the five naval powers of the United States, Britain, France, Italy and Japan, on the limitation of naval armament. The main provisions of the treaty were: the ratio of the total tonnage of the main ships of the United States, Britain, Japan, France and Italy was 5.25:5.25:3.15:1.75:1.75. For the foreseeable decade, the U.S. empire will surely do the same thing, pulling China to sit down and do similar negotiations. Because an unrestricted naval arms race would overwhelm the finances of both countries, China would also be happy to see a slowdown in shipbuilding, because after 2025, the cost of building the Chinese 055 would rise from half of the current Arleigh Burke IIA to 80%.

    • @Absolut531kmh
      @Absolut531kmh Před 2 lety

      What kind of bias is this? The zumwalt focuses on ground targets more than surface targets.

  • @ThatsMrPencilneck2U
    @ThatsMrPencilneck2U Před 2 lety +7

    Ships "weigh" anchors; they "displace" tons.

  • @notsohandytim5090
    @notsohandytim5090 Před rokem

    A far cry from the leftover WWII Tin Can I resided on back in the '60s when we were still trying to figure what a drone was.

  • @michaeldobson107
    @michaeldobson107 Před 2 lety

    Zuumwalt: "...there are only 3 of them made." Yep. And that's gonna be it, too. lol.

    • @rayjames6096
      @rayjames6096 Před 2 lety

      None of the other destroyers on the list were produced in more than four except for the Arleigh Burke class and they're all far less advanced as the Zumwalt.

  • @ALWH1314
    @ALWH1314 Před 2 lety +90

    Sejong is a larger version of Burk, same VLS, radar and most weapons, Zumwalt is an experimental failure and it’s more a land attack platform not destroyer with strong ASW. All three use single band 4.3 meter radar and old SM2 or 6 missiles. Older Burk radar is passive, only new block 2A and yet to commission block 3 have active array radar, I don’t know which Sejong has. How can these be better than 055 dual band 5 meter active array radar, larger size VLS and hypersonic missiles? I get you don’t want to be politically incorrect to praise Chinese, I suggest you should just omit both Russian and Chinese in your review instead of technically bias.

    • @discordmoderator313
      @discordmoderator313 Před rokem +6

      Type 055 has 112 VLS cells, whilst the Sejong the Great Class has 128 VLS cells, making it the most heavily armed warship bar the Russian Kirov class battlecruisers. At least get your facts right dude.

    • @MrRuoxi
      @MrRuoxi Před rokem +13

      @@discordmoderator313 when you have a beast hand but a near sighted eyes, how could you be stronger

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 Před rokem

      Burke Flight IIA and Burke Flight III have the new AN/SPY-6 radar. Those are definitely better than the Type 346 radar used on Chinese Type 055. Even the older AN/SPY-1D is a bit better. Type 346B radar is comparable to UK's Type 45 SAMPSON and S1850M radar in terms of detection range. While Burke only has 96 VLS cells, the missiles that they carry are dual/triple purpose. Take for example Tomahawk can target both land and sea targets at long range. Type 055 has separate missiles for that. CJ-10 for long range land attack, YJ-18 for short range anti-ship, and YJ-21 for long range anti-ship. There is also SM-6 for both ballistic and air defense, but can also target land and sea at short range. Type 55's HHH-9 is only for air defense.

    • @seoul_louis9584
      @seoul_louis9584 Před rokem

      This is the reason why china is one the most hated countries in the world. They are so nationalistic and don't know their place. Are you serious? China doesn't even have good technology. They are all copycats or stolen technologies

    • @MrRuoxi
      @MrRuoxi Před rokem +22

      ​@@seoul_louis9584 you should better talk to your politicans, I see no reason they should worry about China if it is as you said.
      On one side guys like you say China is nothing but just a crap country, on the other side, you say China is the top one threat of U.S. in political, tech and economy. Do you feel the logical problem here?

  • @MrDilemmash
    @MrDilemmash Před 2 lety +5

    Love this video 📹 ❤

  • @victormartin6608
    @victormartin6608 Před 2 lety +1

    Very good video !!!

  • @thediciple40channel11
    @thediciple40channel11 Před 2 lety +56

    Feel like the Zuumwalt and Arleigh Burke should trade places considering that all the complications that came with the 3 Zuumwalts made the Navy stop its production and resume production of more Arleigh Burkes

    • @user-os2hl3fe5i
      @user-os2hl3fe5i Před rokem +11

      Talking about the comprehensive combat effectiveness is that China's 055 destroyer is the most powerful! No matter radar or stealth system, as well as the complete set of weapons! The Arleigh Burke class destroyers are all products of 40 years ago! 055 is a product after 2015. Your ranking itself is fair!! Obviously, there are double standards in the United States from the country to the people!! Where can there be notarization?? It's like taking a bag of washing powder to hit a country!

    • @bieke780
      @bieke780 Před rokem +3

      The Zumwalt class is a failed experiment, not combat-effective at all .The Arleigh Burke class is 40 years old and its performance is outdated!King Sejong class cannot be invisible in front of radar,So the strongest battleship is the 055 type!

    • @j.m.youngquist419
      @j.m.youngquist419 Před rokem

      I thought they only had two of the zumwalt class

    • @definitelyfrank9341
      @definitelyfrank9341 Před rokem

      Zumwalt lacks a long range volume search radar.

  • @zeezee968
    @zeezee968 Před rokem +43

    The Zumwalt may be the most technologically advance ship in the list but it definitely not the most powerful.

    • @timothychung4811
      @timothychung4811 Před rokem +3

      It has been a disaster for them so far.

    • @fatdoi003
      @fatdoi003 Před rokem +1

      1/2 of its radar is missing.... they're just blank panels lol

    • @mysygisun3335
      @mysygisun3335 Před rokem

      使い方ではありませんか、ただズムワルトは駆逐艦とするより、
      使い方=強襲揚陸艦支援艦の立場から、フリゲイト・軽巡洋艦としたほうが正しいのでは。

    • @dayanwarna5270
      @dayanwarna5270 Před rokem

      and the guns...

    • @spencer7404
      @spencer7404 Před 4 měsíci

      No, it's not.

  • @hongyuzhou8935
    @hongyuzhou8935 Před rokem +11

    055 is the most powerful destroyer as far by now.
    The most very first outstanding, but not one of them.

  • @user-ph6nu8kq9y
    @user-ph6nu8kq9y Před rokem +1

    줌 월트 정말 대단하고 멋있다.

  • @abdurrahmanahmadashshiddiq6231

    nice thumbnail

  • @ketefe9562
    @ketefe9562 Před 2 lety +106

    Type055 has the most powerful firepower which 112 the biggest missile silos that can hold 448 missiles and the most advanced radar which the only warship in the world has an integrated radio frequency system. The tonnage and stealth performance is second. Type055 overall performance far exceeds Zumwalt and Arleigh Burke Class and junk Sejong the Grea.

    • @Big-O43
      @Big-O43 Před 2 lety +5

      HAHAHA Chinese junk that does not work very well, the 055 will crap itself in a real confrontation. Most Chinese made things are first stolen tech from someone else, second poorly reengineered and produced.

    • @ketefe9562
      @ketefe9562 Před 2 lety +13

      ​@@Big-O43 Yes, China always steals what you don't have. All companies sanctioned by the United States against China have advanced technology than the United States. Just like the United States sanctions Huawei’s 5G technology that the United States does not possess.How is it useful? The U.S. still has to pay Huawei 5G patent fees and Huawei's 6G technology is still far ahead.

    • @Big-O43
      @Big-O43 Před 2 lety +2

      @@ketefe9562 Keep on dreaming, chinese produce crap, always have, always will. If they cant copy or steal western tech, russia then gives them their junk tech. China cant even keep a disease contained in a lab, infected the entire world, many wonder if that was on purpose !

    • @ketefe9562
      @ketefe9562 Před 2 lety +28

      @@Big-O43 China is not as backward as you think. Even in time during the simultaneous blockade of the United States and the Soviet Union and its allies, China's technology was not backward and also could build fighter jets and artificial satellites. In addition, to use well-known knowledge does not constitute theft, just as you speak English, it cannot be said that you have stolen just because you are not British.

    • @Big-O43
      @Big-O43 Před 2 lety +2

      @@ketefe9562 Right, yet they keep making junk and unleashed a virus on the world that many believe was done on purpose ! I'll give ya that they are the best on spying and stealing from others. What about the sub par steel that they make that when is collapses hurts others, the poison in plastic that was used to make childrens toys the list can go on and on. China cant design anything technologically advanced without stealing the ability or russia giving it to them. They put out more propaganda than N Korea and Russia combined. You want to talk about their human rights issues also, the Nation is a joke !

  • @martinroberts4391
    @martinroberts4391 Před 2 lety +5

    6 type 45 destroyers and 180 crew

  • @Mundo-bn2ho
    @Mundo-bn2ho Před 2 lety

    n.1 looks more like a Modern Art museum than a boat

  • @arianfeizy6389
    @arianfeizy6389 Před rokem

    Thanks for Persian subtitle

  • @Trac1992
    @Trac1992 Před rokem +5

    Sejong The Great class have length is 167 meters

  • @addedcheese
    @addedcheese Před 2 lety +26

    I'm sure the US navy will eventually make something of the Zumwalt but as of now I highly doubt it is the most powerful destroyer afloat given the huge amount of problems with the ships

    • @user-ss7qs4ps1i
      @user-ss7qs4ps1i Před 2 lety +3

      The largest problem being technological immaturity, they fitted to much untested new technologies into it causing price overflow, unexpected systematic issues etc

    • @addedcheese
      @addedcheese Před 2 lety +4

      @@user-ss7qs4ps1i somehow that sounds like a lot of military projects around the world. Great in theory but execution causes problems

    • @paulchung9921
      @paulchung9921 Před rokem +1

      All in all, the firepower of the Zumwalt places it as a top tier, but its survival ability is dismal and nothing like WWII destroyers.

    • @addedcheese
      @addedcheese Před rokem +2

      @@paulchung9921 just what... The zumwalts primary weapon is unusable. As it stands it it just a glorified missile boat with really good stealth.
      What is that comment about WW2 ships?? Modern warfare is completely different so ofc the tools employed are completely different. A modern ship doesn't need to be able to take a hit as in general not getting hit in the first place is far more effective

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 Před rokem

      Zumwalt is more like a submarine than a destroyer. Stealthy like a submarine, and carries long range missile like a submarine. Anyway, it's being repurposed and its gun will be replaced by the Navy's new CPS (Conventional Prompt Strike) hypersonic missile, which is their version of Army's LRHW (Long Range Hypersonic Weapon) that is operational since October last year.

  • @henrybancroft9039
    @henrybancroft9039 Před 2 lety +1

    Missed the Hobart class

  • @reconnaissance12xx
    @reconnaissance12xx Před 2 lety +3

    세종대왕함이 넘버2야? ㅇ0ㅇ

  • @user-gm1gb8nu8e
    @user-gm1gb8nu8e Před 2 lety +12

    세종대왕 ㅎㄷㄷ
    깜놀했네요

    • @user-jq1rz1ep3m
      @user-jq1rz1ep3m Před 2 lety

      일본의 최신은 마야급이죠
      세종대왕 함은
      실제는 아타고 에게도 많이 밀립니다
      성능 대충 적으려니 글이 너무 길거 같아 패스
      진짜 군사 무기에 투자 좀 더 했으면 좋겠네요

  • @user-ng1fv1vz9v
    @user-ng1fv1vz9v Před rokem +4

    저 순위에 있는 구축함을 누가 조종하느냐에따라 순위가 또 달라질수있다~~

  • @Naz_i206
    @Naz_i206 Před 11 měsíci +1

    Maya class destroyer(an improved Atago) should be in the list

  • @user-lt6ke9hg8f
    @user-lt6ke9hg8f Před 2 lety +27

    Our 055 is used in fisheries. . There should be no place for him on this list.

  • @ironspirit3823
    @ironspirit3823 Před 8 měsíci +6

    If you don't put type 055 as No.1, meaning you either have zero common sense of how mordern naval warfare goes, or you are just a totally not objective military channel

  • @aryaputram
    @aryaputram Před 2 lety +59

    Vishakhapatnam and kolkata Class🔥🔥🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @shaddinmalik6364
      @shaddinmalik6364 Před 2 lety +4

      Lol

    • @aryaputram
      @aryaputram Před 2 lety +7

      @@shaddinmalik6364 what lol Pakistani 🤣

    • @aryaputram
      @aryaputram Před 2 lety +10

      @@shaddinmalik6364 just beg china for everything even for making baby 🤣🤣😂
      We are independent to make our necessities 🔥🇮🇳
      जय हिंद

    • @shaddinmalik6364
      @shaddinmalik6364 Před 2 lety +1

      @@aryaputram I'm not pakistani I'm russian

    • @aryaputram
      @aryaputram Před 2 lety +8

      @@shaddinmalik6364 🤣🤣shut up liar 🤣

  • @alexandersa1166
    @alexandersa1166 Před 2 lety +1

    where can I find the music from the video?

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 Před 2 lety

    I like this strong destroyers

  • @user-yd2ix5kb5q
    @user-yd2ix5kb5q Před 2 lety +11

    يارب مصر تحصل عليها قريبا

  • @gregbarry5875
    @gregbarry5875 Před 2 lety +26

    I am not sure the Zumwalt should even be on the list, and certainly not at #1. It was a total failure that was over budget by 200% and failed to meet its capabilities.

    • @louiez7179
      @louiez7179 Před rokem +3

      @@anujpandita3387By 'more powerful' ,did u mean those two expensive and useless 155mm cannon?

    • @yili3339
      @yili3339 Před rokem

      agree.

    • @Star832
      @Star832 Před rokem

      Well said Greg

    • @hb1338
      @hb1338 Před rokem

      @@anujpandita3387 In war it is not useful because it can't do anything worthwhile.

    • @fatdoi003
      @fatdoi003 Před rokem +1

      @@louiez7179 don't know why they don't convert them to shoot Excalibur rounds instead

  • @leiabbiepercia4666
    @leiabbiepercia4666 Před rokem +2

    I thought the Arleigh Burke Class Destroyers are top 3 and Type 055 is top 2.

  • @user-ee9wp1jc9s
    @user-ee9wp1jc9s Před rokem +3

    형님들 정조대왕함으로 세대교체 되었습니다 ...

  • @grk5pe2qh9q27
    @grk5pe2qh9q27 Před 2 lety +50

    China's type 055 is the best ocean fishing vessel.

    • @user-yx8bo6pv4d
      @user-yx8bo6pv4d Před 2 lety +19

      Yes, as a Chinese, I agree with you. and I think India is the most powerful countries in Asia.

    • @user-zhoujin
      @user-zhoujin Před 2 lety +2

      @@user-yx8bo6pv4d 扯淡,大韩民国是最强大的国家

    • @user-hf4do1zm9i
      @user-hf4do1zm9i Před rokem +1

      @@user-yx8bo6pv4d 三哥亚州第一,韩过宇宙第一

  • @user-uu6rg4hz7d
    @user-uu6rg4hz7d Před 2 lety +4

    Horizon class mirip frigate bergsmini class

  • @felix25ize
    @felix25ize Před 2 lety +9

    How can you compare the Zumwalt who is in fact a cruiser with her 16000 tons and 155 mm cannon, vs 7000 tons destroyers with much more little armament ?

    • @user-ug4yr8er9g
      @user-ug4yr8er9g Před 2 lety +2

      Лутьший исминец это тип 055 , зумвалд отдыхает.

    • @michaeldobson107
      @michaeldobson107 Před 2 lety

      Because she is classified as a Zumwalt-class destroyer, not a Zumwalt-class cruiser, regardless of what you think? In naval terminology, a destroyer is a fast, maneuverable, long-endurance warship intended to escort larger vessels in a fleet, convoy or battle group and defend them against powerful short range attackers. There is nothing said anywhere about displacement or armament.

    • @fatdoi003
      @fatdoi003 Před rokem

      Japan classified its light carrier as helicopter destroyer flying F35B lol

    • @easonovo
      @easonovo Před 11 měsíci

      ​@@fatdoi003lol笑死了

  • @elbanoleon1037
    @elbanoleon1037 Před rokem

    Good

  • @user-zf4yu3pb9e
    @user-zf4yu3pb9e Před 2 lety +72

    加尔各答不排第一我不服。055小破渔船连个晾衣架都没有就不要上榜了,看看人家伯克和失踪大王先进的雷达波晾衣架多高大威猛。猪母应该跟歼星舰比,毕竟有高贵的需要工匠不断打磨的综合电力系统和天国的电磁炮。

  • @robertnemeth6248
    @robertnemeth6248 Před 2 lety +3

    There were 6 Type 45 destroyers produced not 4...

  • @karimbenzamin2996
    @karimbenzamin2996 Před 2 lety +1

    america: we have the most powerful navy russia: hold my vodka

    • @menlay2k
      @menlay2k Před 2 lety

      Russia doesn't have navy wtf, 0 air craft carriers.

  • @ViacheslavJashin
    @ViacheslavJashin Před 2 lety +1

    Что то Эсминцы потяжелели ,и больше похожи на лёгкие крейсера!!!

  • @roadking1062
    @roadking1062 Před 2 lety +4

    old school squid, anything over 10k is a damn cruiser

  • @aestradarespeto
    @aestradarespeto Před 2 lety +9

    Curious, there are destroyers in this list that weights no more than 500 tons over spanish F-100 class and are clearly less powerfull, mainly due to the lack of a system like AEGIS, but spanish ones are named frigates when serving in Spain Nay and destroyers when in australian Navy.

    • @ThatsMrPencilneck2U
      @ThatsMrPencilneck2U Před 2 lety +2

      Frigate is a weird word that means different kinds of ships depending on what era and what navy. In the US Navy, it didn't describe a ship smaller than a destroy until the 1970's. What Spain and Australia call a "frigate" could be entirely different, even if the Australians speak something that resembles English. Otherwise, "frigate" used to mean a ship of the line, which was anything short of a dreadnought.

    • @juanalvarez5550
      @juanalvarez5550 Před rokem

      No solamente ocurre con las fragatas, sino con cosas más sencillas como la paella: ¡vas a Australia y le llaman "paella" cualquier cosa, aunque no lleve arroz!
      PS: saludos a los australianos, buena gente.

    • @dayanwarna5270
      @dayanwarna5270 Před rokem +1

      @@ThatsMrPencilneck2U Yes the terminology has changed.
      In the 1980s Frigate was used to describe a ship under 3k and destroyer more than 3 (roughly speaking)
      Now the next generation RN frigates displace more than a WW2 arathusa class light cruiser!
      I do think Frigate by the british and Australian Navy means a primary ASW role with secondary AA and AS roles, and destroyer is a AA primary role with a support function of ASW/ASM.
      The T 45 and the Hobart class destroyers have a heavy AA role with the T45 going for a significant weapons boost shortly.
      The T26 for Australia and the UK will have a massive AA role but will be primarly tasked with ASW for fleet support.

  • @GGANBU85
    @GGANBU85 Před 2 lety +2

    미제 1위... 졸라 단단해보이네

  • @ayanasan61
    @ayanasan61 Před 2 lety +1

    Do you understand the deficiencies?
    About korean SPY-1.

  • @jasondong9721
    @jasondong9721 Před 2 lety +6

    Shouldn’t the Zumwalt be last why? Why? No ammo it’s only used for sight seeing

    • @kazzi5874
      @kazzi5874 Před 2 lety +1

      @@anujpandita3387🤣

    • @michaeldobson107
      @michaeldobson107 Před 2 lety

      Definitely take a shot at it then. lol.

    • @shawnhe6180
      @shawnhe6180 Před rokem

      早就成为弃儿的朱姆沃尔特排第一,世宗大王何德何能能排在055和阿利伯克前面?好吧。后面那些垃圾战舰比如顶个球的45都在內,居然没有世界上拥有数量前二的052D,好吧,不愧为充满了意识形态的排名

    • @michaeldobson107
      @michaeldobson107 Před rokem

      @@shawnhe6180 Thanks, Shawn. Wish I could understand what any of those characters mean.

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 Před rokem

      Zumwalt should not be in the list anyway as it's more like a submarine than a destroyer. Stealthy like a submarine, and carries long range missile like a submarine. Anyway, it's being repurposed and its gun will be replaced by the Navy's new CPS (Conventional Prompt Strike) hypersonic missile, which is their version of Army's LRHW (Long Range Hypersonic Weapon) that is operational since October last year.

  • @ba-ub7fb
    @ba-ub7fb Před rokem +17

    谦虚了,世宗大王级应该宇宙第一才对😋

    • @yuejiang4601
      @yuejiang4601 Před rokem +1

      哈哈哈哈哈

    • @brck888
      @brck888 Před rokem

      儿子排爹前面那是僭越啊,就跟日本不敢提谁炸他一样

    • @huichang2425
      @huichang2425 Před rokem

      排第二,现在有正祖大王了,可能将来出现先祖大王就得排第三了。

    • @AK19782
      @AK19782 Před rokem

      哥们,是失踪大王级😅😅😅

  • @funnyman3510
    @funnyman3510 Před rokem

    🔥

  • @xroadcedarhill9224
    @xroadcedarhill9224 Před 2 lety +65

    South Korean 3 of KD-3 batch 2 is comming, it's even bigger and stronger than 3 of preceding ships. Its displacement is more than 12,000 tons, it will arm SM2ER, L-SAM, 1500 to 3000Km LACM, Super & hyper sonic ASM, Red shark and probably short or medium range ballistic missile.
    It's gonna be launched in 2024.

    • @xroadcedarhill9224
      @xroadcedarhill9224 Před 2 lety +3

      @silva neymar Nope, HHI started a construction of the first ship from last October 5th. ROKN rescheduled its construction to have the KD3 ships early and 6 of KDDX ships are postponed few years due to the plan

    • @user-to4pf9bk1j
      @user-to4pf9bk1j Před 2 lety +5

      @@xroadcedarhill9224 Any way, Korea is strong

    • @user-xp4ft4pg6c
      @user-xp4ft4pg6c Před 2 lety +7

      Your strength comes from the United States

    • @seoul_louis9584
      @seoul_louis9584 Před 2 lety +2

      @@user-xp4ft4pg6c Lol its not

    • @musician5378
      @musician5378 Před 2 lety +1

      I'm Korean. From 2023 is correct.

  • @shaunphillips1970
    @shaunphillips1970 Před rokem +6

    4????? Type 45 Built was 6...D 32 Daring / D 33 Dauntless/D 34 Diamond / D 35 Dragon / D 36 Defender / D 37 Duncan

  • @gekikara_48
    @gekikara_48 Před 2 lety +9

    KIROV-CLASS BATTLECRUISER with Hyper Sonic Zircon? Did you forget it?

    • @grzegorzstyrna26
      @grzegorzstyrna26 Před 2 lety

      Is it destroyer or battlecruiser?

    • @gekikara_48
      @gekikara_48 Před 2 lety

      in the description, can be as a destroyer

    • @ser43_OLDC
      @ser43_OLDC Před 2 lety

      That is a battlecruiser, but yes the Goroskov class is name frigate but is clearly a destroyer

    • @oldcynical2845
      @oldcynical2845 Před 2 lety

      Nice missiles but is a poor asw & air defense platform.

    • @ser43_OLDC
      @ser43_OLDC Před 2 lety

      @@oldcynical2845 Excuse me what? Poor air defense? I didn't know that having a400 was a poor Ground to Air defense

  • @pis4578
    @pis4578 Před 2 lety +31

    자랑스러운 우리대한민국 🇰🇷 세종대왕함

    • @user-hj9ez6jc5z
      @user-hj9ez6jc5z Před 2 lety +4

      The problem is people who can't master it.

    • @Teemo-_-
      @Teemo-_- Před 2 lety +9

      @@user-hj9ez6jc5z Have you lost your thinking function due to exposure to Fukushima radiation?

    • @user-en8dm6po7c
      @user-en8dm6po7c Před 2 lety

      There is a culture of putting a toilet in the kitchen in this country

    • @theshoutingt573
      @theshoutingt573 Před 2 lety +1

      소한민국 사람 미친 사람 같다. 도량이 작아서, 비겁해서, 무엇도 작아서

    • @user-by2wg3si3d
      @user-by2wg3si3d Před 2 lety +2

      失踪大王

  • @lenthokchom
    @lenthokchom Před rokem +1

    Lol the type 055 destroyer deserve the top spot. The only destroyer with a hypersonic missile in service.

  • @lightfootpathfinder8218
    @lightfootpathfinder8218 Před 2 lety +18

    There are 6 type 45 destroyers in the Royal navy not 4

  • @nopants3560
    @nopants3560 Před 2 lety +3

    Type 45 at 9 hahaha ! Number 1 . It can monitor 2000 targets the size of a ball travelling Mach 3

    • @ENGBriseB
      @ENGBriseB Před rokem

      Plus it has the only Ballistic missiles defense and destroy system in Europe. And UKs Dragonfire Laser weapon system.

  • @Absolut531kmh
    @Absolut531kmh Před 2 lety

    Thta edited 055 in the thumbnail tho XD

  • @rafalef42
    @rafalef42 Před 2 lety +6

    Where is japanese Maya class??..it is superior to Atagos

  • @Mn12074
    @Mn12074 Před 2 lety +6

    The thumbnail 😂😂😂

  • @dpzzkr7880
    @dpzzkr7880 Před 2 lety +11

    颜值排名:1、Zumwalt 2、type055 其他的都是上个时代的

    • @user-dq6yk5fd8c
      @user-dq6yk5fd8c Před 2 lety +3

      加尔各答和055排名挨着,笑到了

    • @dddddh1
      @dddddh1 Před 2 lety +2

      zhumuwoerte有点太科幻了,但并不好看

    • @vettellewis7768
      @vettellewis7768 Před rokem +3

      综合实力最强的明显是055,不清楚作者以什么排名排的,朱姆沃特更像是一艘先进技术集合试验舰并没有形成有效战力

    • @chloey3492
      @chloey3492 Před rokem +1

      @@vettellewis7768 人家也知道055很牛逼但是就是不敢排到前面

    • @user-pp2xj1jl4r
      @user-pp2xj1jl4r Před rokem +1

      那个已经提前退休了,有什么资格和055比

  • @ronniefarnsworth6465
    @ronniefarnsworth6465 Před 2 lety +2

    Future USN Burke Flight lll (building), case closed !!
    Until the New USN DDX is designed !!!

  • @user-fc5tu4nd1v
    @user-fc5tu4nd1v Před 2 lety +18

    055是渔船不是军舰

  • @karthikvj1106
    @karthikvj1106 Před 2 lety +39

    Zumwalt is not a class of destroyer class it is a TABPUS (Technologically Advanced But Practically Useless) class ship.

    • @chrisdean6700
      @chrisdean6700 Před 2 lety +3

      That's what the US military wants everyone to believe. I suspect the Zumwalt is at the cutting edge of laser tech and a very dangerous warship.

    • @ethanfriedrich
      @ethanfriedrich Před 2 lety +9

      Technically Zumwalt is a gunboat not a destroyer. It’s not built for naval warfare but for land attack. This guy doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

    • @karthikvj1106
      @karthikvj1106 Před 2 lety +1

      @@chrisdean6700 You maybe right but we don't know I just said it based on what is out about it.

    • @karthikvj1106
      @karthikvj1106 Před 2 lety +3

      @@ethanfriedrich If it was so advanced then why did Navy cut it's number from 32 to 3.US is not a country that backs out from a project for it being costly.... sorry if my comments offended you

    • @muksindika8806
      @muksindika8806 Před 2 lety

      czcams.com/video/iMZf_BYCk9U/video.html

  • @Malaga19
    @Malaga19 Před rokem +1

    Destroyer f💯 💥🇪🇸🇪🇦

  • @user-vr8wl3re2k
    @user-vr8wl3re2k Před 8 měsíci +1

    Isn't the Type 055 technically a Cruiser?

  • @user-zd6jm5sq5c
    @user-zd6jm5sq5c Před 2 lety +4

    what about maya class?

  • @ikko4107
    @ikko4107 Před 2 lety +4

    私はあきづき型護衛艦が好きです

  • @Trac1992
    @Trac1992 Před rokem +1

    Arleigh Burke have length is 154 meters

  • @hideoyamada4999
    @hideoyamada4999 Před rokem

    Ship listed as No,8 is "AKIZUKI"class, no "i" beteen "A" and "K", just in case nobody else had corrected.

  • @Seenit_73
    @Seenit_73 Před 2 lety +3

    Playing World of warships does not make you a Naval Engineer...

  • @wongkcmichael5
    @wongkcmichael5 Před 2 lety +20

    It is a laughingstock. A 1991 US built destroyer is better than a China one made in 2019????

    • @PoorPakistanisSurrenderwasFant
      @PoorPakistanisSurrenderwasFant Před 2 lety +1

      Chynes 😂
      Today a Chynes made J-10 Crashed 😂

    • @user-bu6rz9by2r
      @user-bu6rz9by2r Před 2 lety +2

      @@PoorPakistanisSurrenderwasFant A Indian M2000 crashed . Loser make fake news 😂

    • @yuxuanliu6973
      @yuxuanliu6973 Před 2 lety +1

      @@user-bu6rz9by2r 兄弟。确实有一架歼十双座坠毁了。不过和三哥比坠毁。太没追求了吧

    • @TSUTENKAKU007
      @TSUTENKAKU007 Před 2 lety +2

      I could be wrong, but perhaps what he is thinking and comparing is based on the overall quality of internal features. As we all know by now that China rather prefers to manufacture inferior or should I say, poor quality products, anything from chop sticks to more sophisticated products. They may look very impressive from the outside, but what counts the most is how well the inside is made, reliability factor as well and overall quality of what U.S. has been making in many past years with quality in mind. Just imagine many of Chinese fighters are reverse engineered Russian products with poor performing engines. So this is what I think what this presentation is talking about, based on overall quality despite U.S. destroyers were originally designed around 1991. Also don't forget all of U.S. destroyers have went through many upgrades with much improved weapon systems to the highest standards of today's navy, so these destroyers will not be fighting with 1991 antiquated equipments. The presentation should have mentioned this factors.

  • @island8555
    @island8555 Před rokem +1

    대함미사일10기를 막을수있는 구축함 있으면 1등이라해줄게....

  • @shahrulnizamdenialshezali8518

    Russian Destroyer be like: Am i joke to you

  • @ENGBriseB
    @ENGBriseB Před rokem +6

    The Royal Navy has 6 Type 45 Destroyers. They've just been upgraded with new missile systems. With Sea Viper Evolution and Sea Ceptor. Top 10 strongest Navies in the world 2022. The UK is 4th and by 2030 the UK will have 24 new Frigates and destroyers. And 150 new ships and submarines for the Royal Navy in the next 30 years.

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 Před rokem

      go cry.

    • @ENGBriseB
      @ENGBriseB Před rokem +1

      @@rohitb5834 No I'll will have a laugh at your only Aircraft carrier instead.

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 Před rokem

      @@ENGBriseB lol, better than yours

    • @fuicharles
      @fuicharles Před rokem +1

      i afraid Korean will take your number 4th position in 2030 in term of destroyer/frigates capabilities.

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 Před rokem

      @@fuicharles more like 6th..after US China India Japan Russia

  • @romankatz1421
    @romankatz1421 Před 2 lety +4

    Najwięcej okrętów rdza zniszczyła!

    • @muksindika8806
      @muksindika8806 Před 2 lety

      czcams.com/video/iMZf_BYCk9U/video.html

    • @rayjames6096
      @rayjames6096 Před 2 lety

      Rusting will happen to steel hulled ships that live in saltwater. when they go into dry dock for maintenence they are also repainted.

  • @blairshi2045
    @blairshi2045 Před 2 lety +2

    ype 055 is a fishing boat😀

  • @danielqi7716
    @danielqi7716 Před rokem +1

    055 is just a small fishing boat and cannot enter the Top 10😎

  • @seventian6117
    @seventian6117 Před 2 lety +3

    India and Korea destroyer shall have top 2 spots, Zumwalt a distance 3.

    • @kazzi5874
      @kazzi5874 Před rokem

      您的评论是基于实际情况。但我不希望美国人阅读这条评论。

    • @user-pz4un1wx9j
      @user-pz4un1wx9j Před rokem +1

      韩国第一,印度第二,无可争议的!

    • @liangcongg
      @liangcongg Před rokem

      你是懂驱逐舰的

    • @user-yx9bg3sz7r
      @user-yx9bg3sz7r Před 9 měsíci

      @@user-pz4un1wx9j你小子

  • @willhu3601
    @willhu3601 Před 2 lety +8

    Can the hybrid boat in India rank fifth? All of India’s weapons depend on foreign support. When the war begins, they will all become shit.

    • @muksindika8806
      @muksindika8806 Před 2 lety +1

      czcams.com/video/iMZf_BYCk9U/video.html

    • @THE_VARUN_EDITZEE
      @THE_VARUN_EDITZEE Před 2 lety +1

      Why Chinese People are Always Living in Balck 😂😂
      Foreigners Suport 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
      Came in War Then Understand 😁

    • @simplespecial3313
      @simplespecial3313 Před 2 lety +1

      Kolkata class is indian made .....i feel Agni 5 will land in Beijing if you think this ! ....

    • @willhu3601
      @willhu3601 Před 2 lety

      @@simplespecial3313 The power system of the Kolkata-class destroyer comes from Ukraine, the radar comes from Israel, the anti-ship missile comes from Russia, the anti-aircraft missile and close-to-air gun come from Israel and Russia, the ship management system comes from Canada, the naval gun comes from Italy, and the helicopter comes from Russia , you just put them together, don't kid yourself ok?By the way, Agni 5 is also a piece of shit compared to DF 41

    • @simplespecial3313
      @simplespecial3313 Před 2 lety

      Okay something more ?????

  • @coloradoawesomesauce5124
    @coloradoawesomesauce5124 Před 2 lety +1

    I thought HMS Duncan would make the list ...

    • @ENGBriseB
      @ENGBriseB Před rokem

      Especially with them all being upgraded now and having the only Maritime Ballistic missile defense system in Europe. Plus Dragonfire Laser directed energy weapons. (LDEW) And Sea Ceptor missile systems. And Sea Viper.They are getting armed to the teeth which one should place them nearer to the top.

  • @tigerpjm
    @tigerpjm Před 2 lety +12

    Zumwalt Class.
    You don't know what you're talking about...

  • @taiwanno1wan126
    @taiwanno1wan126 Před 2 lety +39

    zumwalt is not really a destroyer at all this is a silly list. The US had to use the burke for the zumwalt role because the zumwalt can never shoot down ballistic missles. It is more of a cruiser or battle ship but now is just a test bed for laser weapons and rail guns etc. Why this list does not include the hobart class is beyond me, it has far better tech then half the destroyers listed. you have a 90s japanese destroyer above it and even the burke is an 80s design

    • @tigerpjm
      @tigerpjm Před 2 lety +2

      Mainly because most people don't know Australia exists, so how are they going to know about anything to do with the Australian Defence Force?

    • @jacksonteller1337
      @jacksonteller1337 Před 2 lety +1

      Not rail gun they are fitting them with hypersonic missiles in place of the main land attack guns. Lasers are already on it and after 2025 they will be used for stealth attacks on land and sea targets. But you can compare them with old battle cruisers or pocket battleships. They are too expensive and too heavily armed for a destroyer. They could serve as the basis of the new cruiser type when they decided they need a cruiser. Now they are building the new destroyer type as a replacement for the Ticonderoga class first and later on to replace the older models of the Arleigh Burke class. But as near peer warfare becomes a possibility again they will probably dust these off as a stand alone platform.

    • @jasondong9721
      @jasondong9721 Před 2 lety

      @@tigerpjm what is Australia? A country? A prison?

    • @tigerpjm
      @tigerpjm Před 2 lety +1

      @@jasondong9721
      What is Jason Dong? A person? A penis?

    • @rayjames6096
      @rayjames6096 Před 2 lety

      The Zumwalt is a destroyer that specializes in land attack and operates alone.

  • @Caine1277
    @Caine1277 Před rokem

    No hobart class?

  • @ayanasan61
    @ayanasan61 Před 2 lety +1

    Aikizuki←✕
    Akizuki←○
    From Japan.

  • @-philippe7647
    @-philippe7647 Před 2 lety +8

    没有台湾的0.06万吨巨舰塔江舰?差评!熊三在手,天下我有!

    • @shawnhe6180
      @shawnhe6180 Před rokem +1

      哥们,你别逗我了,这船进水了

  • @korea8746
    @korea8746 Před 2 lety +37

    Korea's King Sejong the Great is 2nd place joy. 🇰🇷 🇰🇷 🇰🇷

    • @tugrulzan3136
      @tugrulzan3136 Před 2 lety +8

      Respect and love from TURKEY 🇹🇷🇹🇷

    • @user-xp4ft4pg6c
      @user-xp4ft4pg6c Před 2 lety +2

      Your strength comes from the United States

    • @tugrulzan3136
      @tugrulzan3136 Před 2 lety +1

      @@user-xp4ft4pg6c many countries strength Come from US

    • @BITCO1N
      @BITCO1N Před 2 lety +1

      @@tugrulzan3136 thank you and It's late, but happy new year🇰🇷🇹🇷🇰🇷🇹🇷