Going Back in Time to Stop the Second Amendment - Key & Peele
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 09. 2020
- During the Constitutional Convention, one of the delegates raises some uncannily forward-thinking concerns about the right to bear arms.
About Key & Peele:
Key & Peele showcases the fearless wit of stars Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele as the duo takes on everything from "Gremlins 2" to systemic racism. With an array of sketches as wide-reaching as they are cringingly accurate, the pair has created a bevy of classic characters, including Wendell, the players of the East/West Bowl and President Obama's Anger Translator.
Subscribe to Comedy Central: / @comedycentral
Watch more Comedy Central: / comedycentral
Follow Key & Peele:
Facebook: / keyandpeele
Twitter: / keyandpeele
Watch full episodes of Key & Peele: www.cc.com/shows/key-and-peele
Follow Comedy Central:
Twitter: / comedycentral
Facebook: / comedycentral
Instagram: / comedycentral
#KeyandPeele - Komedie
I shot up a piece of paper, now everyone carries pulse rifles. Consequences.
Pulse rifles? FN2000 5.56mm bullpup. Design is like 20 years old...
^ look at this high-and-mighty nerd
Kekw
@@derrickrobinson7269 nerd? I'm not the one talking about fucking pulse rifles lol
@@emmanuelgoldstein2558 he jus mad u beat em to the punch at pointing out what rifle it actually was lul.
"I used the second amendment to destroy the second amendment"
czcams.com/play/PLZOMlO2_17fvIiTRFiQ9C2OqfGER03v4G.html
I'd like to see your opinion on theese set of videos.
I'll look for your coments under them"
I used the stones to destroy the stones!
Consequences!!
I USED THE STONES TO DESTROY THE STONES
this is why the second amendment is important
"Pass me the quill let me draw it before i forget" LMFAO
😂 Like every Mad H artist do Speed run with they drawing 😂
Weren't the founding fathers under 50?
Of course, they're going to think this is pretty cool. We're going to be bad ass in the future 😅.
Gotta admit, this comment section is way more friendly and wholesome than I expected.
It's because conservatives are able to have a laugh at a sketch without resorting to shit-slinging the creators because their political views don't align. I know, fascinating.
its just silly enough I try to assume noone actually thinks it.
Retro Progress Right. Except when the Dixie Chicks write a song about Dubya. Or "French fries" need to be rebranded to "Freedom fries" 'cause the French weren't supportive of the Iraq War. Or when Nike supports Kaepernick so Nike shoes must be burnt. Or when a hissy fit gets thrown about Potato Head, or Dr. Seuss, or Dungeons and Dragons. Guess all of those warrant shit-flinging, right.
@@RP-dy5mu I dunno, after the hissy fits I’ve seen over Dr Seuss, Potato Head, and Lil Nas X, I think the ability to be a hysterical reactionary knows no political boundaries.
@@ursaminor9780 if those thing you listed were in a comedy skit, they would be. But the fact that they are real makes it scary and worth calling out.
"Gentlemen, imagine if someone were to invent a gun capable of firing hundreds of rounds in a minute"
"Oh, sick! That sounds bad ass!"
"Sounds like it will become a staple in the moving pictures industry!"
That is pretty much what they would have said.
A point of order !!!
They were already in existence back then, congress almost bought a bunch for the military
@[[Eunsunglee ] I’m not saying you did, but do you think civilians actually purchase these?
To think, there's still skits i haven't seen
@@xaex7711 ok mister xaex
@@xaex7711 what a sad clown
@@xaex7711 if you think Kevin Hart is funnier than them, this comment is pretty much invalid
didnt this come out today?
your dumb
Plot twist - in this new timeline the gun shop owner had the phased plasma rifle in 40 watt range
Hey pal, only what you see...
Wait, you cant do tha-
@@destroyanad8651 Wrong.
Let me close up early
way underrated comment. not enough people got the joke sadly
actually when the 2nd amendment was written they had the Girandoni rifle with a high capacity magazine and privately owned cannons that when loaded with grapeshot were capable of wiping out entire crowds of people.
If I understand correctly, the grapeshots were regularly used on naval ships to take out personnel of the opposing ship, while the cannonballs were anti-ships.
Do educate pls
Yeah there were a few rich guys with cannons, but most ppl didn't even have A gun let alone enough to kill a small army like some of the nutters these days
@@louisarius9672 grapeshot was also the most effective cannon shot used on land based cannons for stopping charging hostile crowds. It was used more often than cannon balls against the native Americans. Cannon balls like grapeshot were used more on land than out at sea and were originally designed for defeating fort and castle walls but was also found effective in anti ship roles.
The shot was also popular with navies like you mentioned, but everyone who had a cannon including none affiliated individuals kept grapeshot handy.
And there were, is and always have been more land based cannons than naval guns.
@@iannonya5282 enough people had firearms that were superior to the cheap military arms, that those few people you mentioned were able to defeat the world's most powerful military.
But even with that victory over tyranny, the founders agreed with you and tried making every single individual responsible to keep and bear sufficient arms to carry out the mission of maintaining a freedom pursuing society.
@@benwilson5893 I'd also add that in those days the priority wasn't to have as many likes/followers as possible on TikTok and other social media platforms.
Uses guns to take away guns
“Ironic”
Wow thanks for explaining the joke I didn't get it
You will have thousands of likes in a year
Yup. Hmm.. Weird.
Hypocrisy
I used the stones to destroy the stones
At this point I'm convinced that the original run of Key & Peele is some kind of a paradox with an infinite number of sketches.
well there are 5 whole seasons worth of skits with 10 episodes each season and at least 6 sketches in each episode.
@@BeaverChainsaw But I've seen every season and they still post skits I haven't seen ALL THE TIME...
Interdimentional Cable.
Jesus fellas. We've been in quarantine for far too long. Wait...what?
@ADAM CARREON wtf are you actually stupid or something its because their skits are quality like Alternatio didn't spell his name correctly I think
Fun fact the founding fathers were actually aware of the existence of machine guns
of course. only idiots would think that the evolution of firearms is completed in 1776. if you know that there was once an hourglas and than a clockwork (wich was already very common in 1776) you also can extrapolate a fully automatic gun from a musket. it is not that hard. people were not stupid back then.
Well the Puckle gun existed in the late 18th century, it was basically a repeating cannon
@@asdfjkl981 EXACTLY. We imagine in the the future there will be; plasma rifles, rail guns, energy based weapons, bullets/projectiles that track track body heat and or movement. We imagine all kinds of firearm advancements. What would make us think that the founding fathers couldn't imagine advancements. Even if there weren't machine guns in that time period, its not hard to imagine point A to point B.
And bombs, and cannons... and tyranny. Some real history on 2A intent czcams.com/video/9kWW_y5deeg/video.html
So you guys are cool with people having rocket propelled grenades at home without a licence or do you think there needs to be some limits?
Dont forget that they allowed people to have _cannons_ , hard hitting naval artillery weapons. That’d be akin to long range missile launchers today.
They knew what they were allowing.
-SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
-NECESSARY FOR THE DEFENSE OF THE STATE
all gun laws are non statutory and ever changing. Gun control is nonsensical
What most people don't realize is that the first rapid fire machine gun was invented over 50 years before the constitution was drafted. And they were used during the revolutionary war.
@Yeshua Is Lord No ? Nazi germany was a collusion of so many things, a rise of radical political parties in Europe, a wave of manifesto and movement anti-jews coming from URSS who gave those radical parties a scapegoat to arouse the anger of the german people who were furious about the landscape following the 1st world war and the economic distress of 1929. It's a lot and lot of things. Not "people gun taken away so nazi germany"
Very different culture back then. Now the population is made up of self-centered nihilistic slobs that need the government to take care of them and think personal responsibility is the only evil concept.
It wasn’t the the government “allowed” people to have naval cannons because the government can’t give us a right. If they could give us a right they can take it away and then it’s a privilege.
Thats probably what would happen. our founding fathers were actually pretty interested in firearms technology
Some of them bought naval artillery and were early investors in things like the puckle gun. That was a precursor to the gattling gun.
@@justinpachi3707 the puckle gun was such an interesting design
@@andreweisen99 The puckle gun? More like the SUCKLE gun.
Luke William L
And all government has been doing IS infringing!!! ANY and ALL guns laws ARE infringements
Imagine having the budget of Key and Peele just for jokes
that level of cg isn't hard to do these days. average person with a decent computer and some brains could pull that off after a few months of training.
its not JUST cg, all the costume department, extras, props, set, film crew etc.
@@BobbyJ529 there is a lot more to their high production value than just cg, idiot
jacindor j The type of cameras they use, plus lighting, set design, costume, casting etc all seem the equivalent of small movies in many of their skits. They definitely had a way higher than usual budget for this series.
Well that's the benefit of having a comedy central TV show, which they had between 2011-2015! Their budget increased as the show exploded in popularity.
"Gentlemen, imagine if someone were to invent a gun capable of firing hundreds of rounds in a minute"
"Oh my, that sounds glorious. If we could only be so lucky!"
Not with ammo prices the way they are now
China:"we already did"
Four ruffians break into my house. "What the devil?" As I grab my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. Blow a golf ball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw my pistol on the second man, miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grape shot, "Tally ho lads" the grape shot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended.
@@sparkyfister Well, with the free slaves digging those bullet materials from the ground for free and no Wall Street capitalist in the between to fix prices, they would be very very cheap...
@@mikekasich836 that was beautiful sir.
First he's holding Mac-10's then the Founding Fathers were so impressed he litterally got upgraded to FN-2000's.
"""Upgraded"""
I expected some laser shit.
Well hello there skit I haven't seen.
Damien Fuentes there hasn't been a "new" K&P skit since 2015. They're all old, this one just hasn't been uploaded till now
@@fastf00dknight41 that is the least true statement I have heard today
@@mmp5453 no...it took me 5 seconds to google. They stopped making new ones on September 9th 2015
Ipun that’s just the show on comedy central, only aired 53 episodes but they continued making them after it went off air
@@mmp5453 you can find an article ranking "all" 298 skits, and it was posted on September 13th
Uses the Second Amendment to stop the Second Amendment
Edit:
@El Nomad also so that any jack ass can enter your office and threaten your life
Nathaniel Sr. ᴛⷮeͤcͨhͪ cities your house?
@El Nomad actually the Founding Fathers created the 2nd Amendment in case America ever went to war again. Then every citizen would have a gun so they could fight whichever country they went to war against. And now it seems like we’re going to war with each other 😞
I used the stones to destroy the stones
marigo8 yes because the reason why the 2nd exist is to fight against a tyrannical government
I like how the shells fall on the carpet and make the "ting-ting-ting"
Sound 🤣🤣
Ironically he needed the guns to stop the government from making laws that he didn't agree with.
Glad someone still understands that.
Yeah, like, he wanted them to taste what they were doing to their country.
@@JackOLanter Like what? Giving you rights?
@@sababaratashvili8629 More like taking the rights away and invading privacy. America was never great.
@@MLBlue30 "More like taking the rights away and invading privacy."
You are talking about 18th century, right? For that time US was very progressive.
"America was never great."
That's just factually wrong. Unless you're some nutcase like Antifa or something you would know that...
Ok I’m convinced that they are still making skits together. That ‘I am amazed I found skits I never seen before’ thing is getting old now
These skits are pretty old. Like 1-2 years probably
These are like 5 years old. I don't even know if comments like this one isn't some kind of elaborate joke.
MaDNeSS1116 when did they break up
@@UmbrellaSound These are really old skits that were never put online and are just now being released. Some people only know K&P through the internet and are just now seeing this content.
@JohnPwnsOldschool case in point huh buddy?
“did you see the muskets he had?” Lmao
Go back in time and try to terrify them by explaining the Gatling gun and then see Joseph Chambers start frantically writing the details down.
@@Kez_DXX Hey buddy, the Navy already had those for shooting at Turkish pirates
I didn't get the ending part. Could you explain why Peele says damn it in the end and why 2 new bigger guns are shown in the end?
@@megalageorge9197 The Founding Fathers not only knew firearms would be modernized, they also made and bought several thousand firearm innovations. They didn’t exactly stick to muskets.
@@megalageorge9197 Having recieved but a small taste of what firearms developments would unfold as time went on, the Founding Fathers were not willing to settle on merely encouraging their fellow citizens to have dual purpose muskets, purchase cannons, or crew privately owned warships as they did in our timeline. This caused a change in the timeline so that Peele brought back bigger and better guns into the past.
Lol so all he ended up doing was move the Fn F2000 up to being made 40 years earlier
To be fair 40 years is like an sixth of American history. It's a decent jump
The founding fathers knew gun tech would evolve immensely. They still wanted us to have them. They were so intelligent, so ahead of their time. We might never have another moment in history where such genius will ever be displayed again. We need to honor their wisdom.
Ah yes so intelligent that their amendment directly lead to hundreds of thousands dead. Truly such wisdom can never be surpassed
@@cyborgbob1017 You've yet to learn much about human nature.
@@roybatty- and I won’t learn shit from a person who pretends to be an expert in it just to put others down and support their own shitty worldview
@@cyborgbob1017
You're using your 1st a right that the founders got using 2a.
@@cyborgbob1017
Guns in the us are used more in self defence and to prevent crime than to kill.
Uk burgalary stats
" UK Burglary Statistics - How to Protect Against the Biggest Threats
Sarah Smith | Sarah Smith 21 January 2023
UK burglary statistics show that in the year ended March 2022, there were 192,060 police recorded home burglaries across England and Wales, More than 50% of domestic burglaries happened when someone was at home. "
Criminals and armed victims.
"Over 50% of Convicted Felons Fear THIS…
June 11th, 2020,
When it comes to legal gun ownership, there is a broad spectrum of belief. One extreme argues that guns in the hands of gun owners are crimes waiting to happen and when law-abiding Americans own guns, it makes others feel less safe. The other end claims that legal gun ownership is the key to personal protection and without it, Americans have no way to defend themselves against criminals who would do them harm.
With so many differing viewpoints on the subject, it can be hard to separate fact from fiction. That’s why we’re presenting you with three research and data-driven statistics about gun ownership and carrying firearms.
#1: Criminals Fear Armed Civilians
Criminals don’t just fear armed civilians; they go out of their way to avoid them.
According to research completed by the U.S. Department of Justice, private gun ownership influences the behavior of criminals. In this study, over 1,800 imprisoned felons across the country were surveyed on their opinions of firearms.(1) Here is what they learned:
One-third of criminals questioned had encountered an armed victim. The study found 34% of the felons had been scared off, shot at, wounded, or even captured by a gun-owning victim.
56% of those interviewed agreed that criminals intentionally avoid armed victims. If criminals know the individual has a weapon, they chose to target another victim.
Basically, criminals fear the armed civilian more than law enforcement.
There are multiple reasons for this, but the most common include: police are rarely at the crime scene in a timely manner and they are required to follow “policy and procedure.” On the other hand, the average civilian does not receive procedure defense training like the police, so can-and will-act in whatever way they deem necessary to protect themselves. "
Criminals aren't looking for a fight, and a gun is an equaliser for women, elderly and the disabled.
In a self reported survey of gun self defence, over 50% claimed just showing the gun worked, so most of the time the gun is never fired in self defence.
Us burglary stats
" Home Safety and Security Stats and Facts
“The risk of being a victim during a burglary is actually very very low. There’s only someone present 12.5% of the time, and people only became a victim of violence in 26% of those 12.5% cases.”
-Dr. Ben Stickle, criminal justice and theft expert "
There are about 1.65 million home invasions per year, and a million vehicles stolen a year. Unfortunately, I couldn't find the stats for vehicle theft, so I'll use the same as home invasions.
12.5% of 3.65 million is 456,250.
26% of 456,250 is 118,625.
50% of 3.65 million is 1,825,000
26% of 1,825,000 is 474,500
Which is a difference of 355,875.
Of course, the amount of times criminals avoid victims is not exact to the uk, just a rough estimate, as there us no exact way to measure crimes that didn't happen.
In an NCVS report, published in April 2022, 2 percent of victims of nonfatal violent crime - that includes rape, sexual assault, robbery, and aggravated assault - and 1 percent of property crime victims use guns in self-defense. According to the survey, firearms were used defensively in 166,900 nonfatal violent crimes between 2014 and 2018, which works out to an average of 33,380 per year. Over the same period, defensive gun use was reported in 183,300 property crimes, or an average of 36,660 per year.
Taken together, that's 70,040 instances of defensive gun use per year.
And plenty of dgu go unreported. From a forbes article
" reported numbers could also be an underestimate. Just as many sexual assault victims don’t report those crimes to the authorities, many law-abiding people who successfully use a gun to deter a crime without firing a shot may similarly choose to avoid reporting these incidents to the police:
[Y]our possession or use of the weapon might be a matter of greater concern to the cops than whatever the intruder or criminal you were repelling was up to. They’ll doubtless never lay hands on him; you are right there, for any investigation and harassment the cops might want to call forth. Many gun owners or gun users might see little good and much possible bad arising from calling the cops after a DGU incident, and thus many or even most would never make a police blotter, never make a newspaper.
It’s relatively easy to measure the number of lives lost due to criminal gun violence. It’s harder to measure the number of lives saved by legal defensive gun use. Murders that didn’t happen don’t show up on crime statistics. This is just another example of Bastiat’s classic principle of “the seen vs. the unseen.”
So let's add at least 3,585.
In 2022, there were 500 self defence gun deaths and 20,138 gun homicides. Roughly 80% of all gun deaths per year are criminal on criminal ( gang related ).
So now there are 4,027 gun homicides.
Times guns prevent crime
430,000
Times guns kill
4,027
If a gun is used in self defence, we do not know for sure if someone would have died. And that's literally the bare minimum of times guns prevent crime, not including people who would lose thier jobs making, transporting, selling and training guns.
In another ncvs report, A rape or sexual assault occurred in about 3% of households experiencing a completed burglary.
( it said burgalary, which means only instances of home invasions when someone was home )
3% of 206,250 home invasions is 6,187.
And estimates on how many rapes go unreported range from 20% to 63%.
In 2022, there were 40 school shooting deaths.
People hear about those, and wanna ban guns, but what's one time you've heard of the minimum 6,187?
Uses guns to take away guns. “I used the stones to destroy the stones.”
Thats like sideshow bob saying how evil tv’s are from a big screen tv
Yeah but in time travel movies they go back in time to kill people who invented it so
You mean to say like using missiles to destroy missiles...hmmmm
Endgame
Plot Twist: He didn't buy a LEGAL firearm :-)
Him: what if someone made a gun that could shoot say, 50 people in 30 seconds?
Me: Cannon...
Founding fathers: "that sounds badass" 😂
Tchaikovsky NO!
The Supreme court back then did argue about whether cannons should be able to be owned by citizens for their ships and the supreme court ruled that if the government/enemy is able to have it, you can have it. The whole "founding fathers didnt imagine we'd have ak-47s" argument isnt as powerful when you realize if they were in charge now, wed more than likely be able to own such a weapon because they were firm in their second amendment rights due to our countries previous relationship with the crown, not to mention the ever so common fear of future American governments abusing its citizens in a tyrannical fashion.
Exactly my thoughts I'm glad I searched the comment section before posting.
@@notkevindurant8814 Its very silly actually that anyone would think the purpose of the second amendment was to allow people to hunt animals or defend your property. Like no its pretty specifically and obviously there so to overthrow tyrannical governments. Its like arguing free speech was not meant for instant communication.
The ending is the best. They did good with this one
The ending was actually funny, not like someone was trying to push an agenda
“Than I’ll have to terminate the creator of guns”
@@Raul-wd1jb Then slavery would still exist much longer since British and French and later US were the one that advocate the most to abolish slavery.
This is actually a perfect example of a paradox.
How so?
@@FxllxwTheCircle you can't change past
@@ASSASSIN19923 Attractor Field, forces all worldlines to converge into a single point
true👍especially dammit even bigger guns🤣
@@ASSASSIN19923 unless he has to terminate the creator of guns
The only way to stop a bad time traveler with a gun, is a good time traveler with bigger guns.
that's basically the theme of Terminator sequels, right?
@@sam4secretary And much like this sketch, the time travelling cyborgs got increasingly more powerful with every attempt to end them.
@@sam4secretary not exactly... the second one is a Good time traveler with much lesser guns, (but bigger brains)
I like how the time traveling was handled in this. He brought amazing guns back, then it sparked people’s minds and he got even better guns
Oh, I see! I didn't get that originally. Thanks!
The better timeline.🙃
but he could have just shot the guy who drew the guns right? or just kill everyone in the room
@@giraffe3718 ah yes, kill everyone in a room to prevent people in the future from killing everyone in a room, genius
thanks for explaining the joke!
“Shall not be infringed” is pretty dang apparent to me.
@@markdavis7397 well regulated meaning “well functioning” for the time period. Don’t forget “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”
Also, the second amendment is really just an acknowledgment to your inalienable “god given” rights. You have the right to bear arms to defend your self against anyone looking to harm you, including a tyrannical government.
@@markdavis7397the second amendment refers to “arms”. Meaning anything you can hold with your arms. Any firearm/rocket launcher/ cannon etc. your argument is stupid.
@@Tony27654 no you are getting it totally Wrong! educate yourself, the right to bear arms means they could have gone bear hunting and use taxidermy to put it's arm them on walls that's the real right to bear arms'
@@kooshanjazayeri lmao
Fun fact:
There were automatics like the Puckle gun in the 1700s.
Also Rifles that fire more than once unlike how modern people think of firearms in the 1700s. Some each get auction off; if you have FU money go for it. Saw 1 auction where a simple flintlock rifle went for 33k😭
Founding Fathers: ". . .you know we can just write up another one right?"
I guess so. But I have one question.
Do you want to change the words or the meaning of the words? I am asking it because I understand the second amendment is about freedom, that’s why it has never been changed.
@@evandrosilva8565 Why is it about freedom?
@@hansjurgen4567 Because civil liberties are awesome.
@@Kez_DXX And because those who do evil will always have weapons, especially if there's less opposition in the form of a well armed population who love their country and hate what threatens it.
@@juliapigworthy Evil has semi-automatic assault rifles, you have semi-automatic assault rifles.
Evil has knives, you have knives. Well at least the general population won't have to suffer like in the Las Vegas massacre....
You know how Australia got tired of their mass murders? Well they got rid of the mass murder guns and have been better since then. Unless 2nd amendment people really think that USA is soooo close to the breaking point your president will go all Stalin on your ass? In which case i don't really see why you are so damn proud of your country that is held together only by a threat of force...
Nice, they remembered that the founding fathers were revolutionaries
Noyce. They also got it right that John Adams was black.
@@jondunmore4268 except he wasn't
@@-o-dq7nd Wow imagine if that was the joke they made. That would be pretty funny.
@@jondunmore4268 He sounded black on the phone.
Not only that but you could own cannons back then, which would be like owning a rocket launcher today.
I actually wrote a short story with a very similar concept... You can't change the future because you have to introduce things from the future into the past inadvertently creating the same outcome you're trying to avoid.
Haha .. Makes sense.
I guess you'd have to be vague and insistent?
(There's gotta be a way.)
yes You can't change the future because you are the future
Reminder that the founding fathers were fine with civilians owning cannons and were aware of gatling guns that existed and were in use during the time.
Banner shouts in distance: that’s not how time travel works
i was thinking the same haha, i mean i get the point why he got better guns(Because of the two men drawing prototypes) but the more advanced guns shouldn't appear in his hands
@@andresct7421 Depends on what kind of plot convenience you have. Banner's time travel operates under the multiverse theory in which a change in the past will lead to an alternate timeline, without affecting the original timeline you were on. Other forms of time travel make it so that there is only one universe in which we fiddle with time. Really time travel is just a broad idea that writers will detail in their own story, only to inevitably contradict themselves somehow (im looking at you The Flash)
Endgame logic was flawed.
It is true that if they got back in the time and killed baby thanos and returned to the SAME timeline, it wouldn't work but killing baby thanos would have created another timeline where thanos didn't grew up to be an adult
But then they wouldn't be able to go to present in the new timeline as it is new
I disagree because Uzis became a thong inthe 1700s(lore of this vid). So by time his time came around the only thing that seemingly changed was gun tech
He said “Damnit” as if it weren’t the first time he screwed up.
B GONE!!!
Well now we know why everyone in this timeline is running around with all of these overpowered guns
@@sidneykemp1884 there is no such thing as an overpowered gun
Blair Millington bruh
In his original timeline, Archduke Ferdinand turned out to be really mean to Serbs in like the 1930s after acceding to the throne, so he went back to 1914 to waste that dude before he got out of hand. Didn't turn out great.
Truly brought a tear to my eye when he revealed the truth and said, "I am the breaking bad"
0:19 the way he shakes his head after he says "A point of order" 😂😂😭
I missed that, thank you
“I used the guns to destroy the guns” -Thanos
2nd amendment is inevitable.
but what did it cost?
guns... lots of guns..
And failed...
It is annoying bringing everything with a MCU joke.
@@guiguiwilli4268 MCU Joke: I am inevitable.
The way that Key swallowed is so on point! Their wigs are perfect🤣
props to the props team. seems accurate and...
proper 🙃
@@HaveRandomQuestions 😄
Using automatic weapons to stop the allowing of automatic weapons , via a time machine powered by irony
Bro didn’t destroy the second amendment he just improve it and gives it a upgraded version of it
Imagine a never ending feedback loop.
Guy jots down every new weapon Peele holds until he’s holding mini nukes
davy crockett rifle look it up you still aint advanced enough.
😂
Consequences
Wouldn’t be possible the technology to create the weapons at a certain point would be far behind
@@unosheem6210 you seem to have missed the part where this is a skit involving time travel
I want a whole trilogy movie on this
Don't wanna spoil you but, there is one there is one
@@manygoatmany6055 how could you possibly know, what the future holds?
Look up the "Dark" series. It's on Netflix.
Bill and Ted visit the
By the the third movie they have weapons that can rewrite reality and erase objects and living things from any timeline.
Repeating rifles date back to the 1600s
Huh? Source?
@@BeansPredi-ch6xklook up the Puckel Gun, or the Kalthoff repeater
Bro used the second amendment to destroy the second amendment. Bro think he Thanos.
Machine guns were already patented when the founders signed the Constitution.
and some civilians owned warships
Damn so some of them thought that far ahead
Clown
You must be fun at parties.
Not only that, but the founding fathers 100% knew of the existence of these machine guns. It's not like they couldn't understand that technology would advance, I mean they already had the technology at the time.
If only he had just done a little more research on the founding father to learn that a bunch of them were massive gun lovers/enthusiasts and attempted to purchase or did purchase what was essentially their equivalent of machine guns.
they need supreme weapons so bad back in those days 😂
@@user-gv6fp5nt9f revolutions do that
Four ruffians break into my house. "What the devil?" As I grab my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. Blow a golf ball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw my pistol on the second man, miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grape shot, "Tally ho lads" the grape shot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended.
@@mikekasich836 good meme
the 2nd amendment was added to appease racist slave owners.
look it up.
The founding fathers knew about cannons, explosives, extremely long-range rifles (for the time), but didn’t predict that some day guns might shoot faster?
Not to mention Washington commissioned 100 rapid-fire muskets (supposedly up to 8 rounds in 3 seconds) DECADES prior to the writing of the Constitution.
They had weaponry similar to the rate of fire described before, even with muzzleloaders
The moral? Never time travel kids
But if you get to smash
For those who don’t know, there was already a prototype automatic rifle made during these times and they knew it was possible.
Thank you
That's right there were also "high capacity rifles" that held 20 rounds, and the founding fathers were fans and we're going to put in an order for the military till they saw the price tag, and even though they knew they existed they didn't ban them
P-p-p-puckle gunnnnnn
Yes sir
Yeah but they also probably thought only white people would have them and it would help them control their slaves. 🤷♀️
They had us in the first half, not gonna lie
Who’s else here after UVALDE’s shooting ?
“Shall not be infringed” Fed boy
S H A L L N O T
@@sirmount2636 B E I N F R I N G E D
FED BOY
F
I'm still too early for a "Consequences" comment.
For choosing to be too early: CONSEQUENCES!
Consequences man, CONSEQUENCES! 😢😂
You're not. I saw the exact comment you're talking about 2 comments above yours.
I got you fam. Went back in time to stop firearms from being created but i inadvertently created a paradox that unfortunately created even more dangerous firearms in the future which just made my whole objective ironic!!!!!!! Consequences!!!!!!!!
shdoopy loopy “and then a piano fell on your head and you got the HIV... Consequences.”
Maybe he should have brought a paper shredder
Bro fast tracked gun evolution
The Puckle gun, invented in 1718, could shoot ten rounds per minute. Kinda a rapid-fire development that showed real potential. And, by the time the second amendment was signed, lots of variations and improvements had been realized .
You're attempting to logically pursuade those that are not even sure what gender they are.
@@michaeltammaro482 I'm realizing more and more, how insane that is.
However, November's a-coming...
@@michaeltammaro482 well done
@@michaeltammaro482 LOL
@@siegfriedbraun5447 annnd, Republicans somehow lost the senate that November. Sad!
Can we take a moment to respect how they put so much effort into these? They are like mini-movies.
Their sets and costumes are always on point.
They are always awesome. #2A
Imagine believing that the founding fathers didn't know that guns would get more advanced through time.
What they didn't know is that raising a weapon to a police officer (an agent of the state) would come to spell near-certain death regardless of circumstance. And that the supposed people in support of the amendment created to protect us from the state would have no problem with it.
@@franklinbadge1215 Actually, while your premise is false since it isnt regardless of circumstances and over 90% of BLM martyrs were violent criminals, even so, back in the founders day, raising a gun to any type of law enforcement also meant certain death, and even quicker than your imagined scenarios now.
They were quick on justice back then because life wasnt as cushy as you take for granted now.
@@waltermh111 Can I ask where you got that statistic from?
I doubt they anticipated that school shootings would become such a regular thing.
They had lots of guns that could shoot multiple bullets at once. You could own canons if you could afford it.
You realize that around this time period a dude came up with a machine gun that fired for a solid 2 minutes 30 seconds... The founding fathers knew about machine guns and they imagined that there would come a time when they would be in use, I mean hell volley guns existed. Turns out that right after the first gun was made people where already asking "how do I get this to shoot more bullets," and the founding fathers knew it as in the war of 1812 they bought 15 of those guns i mentioned.
its not for home invasion its so if the government starts becoming heavily authoritarian we have the chance to resist
@@KicksPregnantWomen I agree with you? did you ever see an agument in there for why your idea is wrong?
@@shadow435100 I think he may have replied to the wrong comment?
@@Noah-wx7fm No I purposefully replied to him, because... it was weird. I wasn't taking an anti-gun side but more that the founding fathers already knew the dangers and thought that they where worth the risk.
@@shadow435100 oh yes, my bad for not being specific; I was talking about him
The only person who can stop a time traveller with akimbo uzi's is a a time traveller with akimbo FN2000's.
That is exactly what I thought they were too lol
Mac-11s actually. Uzis are better than mac 11s.
When I saw the fn2k's I had to rewind because I just couldn't believe I was seeing the fish gun in a skit
Ew....
The only person who can stop a time traveler with FN2000's is someone with an RPG
Stuff like this actually existed back then a danish rifle invention could fire 30-60 rounds a minute George Washington wanted them but they were f&*ginng expensive
"An armed man is a citizen .. a disarmed man is a subject"-Unkown
- an idiot
@@POPE_FRANC1SYou? Yes
I mean, using guns to take out the gun amendment. That’s like the grandfather clause. It’s a paradox.
The grandfather clause is actually a clause that prevented people of African American ethnicity from voting in the late 1800s. I think you are thinking of the grandfather paradox
Four ruffians break into my house. "What the devil?" As I grab my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. Blow a golf ball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw my pistol on the second man, miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grape shot, "Tally ho lads" the grape shot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended.
If I’m robbing a dude, and he calls me “ruffian.” Bro I’m just walking back out the door. There is nothing in that house worth taking.
He stole the guns, or the military gave them to him as part of his time mission. No second amendment necessary.
That's Andy from According to Jim
Yeah, it's cool he got to be on a show that's actually funny this time.
@@danielstack4158 Indeed.
@@danielstack4158 yeah It was an okay show imo
... I'm just surprised there are four people who know what According to Jim is.
@@ik3astar383 meh, we both like Key & Peele at least. RIP John Belushi
Once you have seen every single Key & Peele sketch ever made, there are still the ones you haven't seen.
Not only were they aware of such possibilities. They frequently sought out repeater guns through out their lives and even funded some precursors to automatic weapons.
Also... for a militia to even be possible at the time, regular citizens had to bring their own weapons which were usually their hunting rifles. So that militias could be formed upon any instance the right to bear arms needed to be enforced for an armed populace to even form a militia.
People like to ignore that Thomas Jefferson owned a pair semi automatic rifles one of which he gave to the Lewis and Clark expedition, a weapon capable of firing over 20 rounds as fast as you could pull the trigger. Historically illiterate people
@@blairpenny1526 The rifle Jefferson owned fired 20 rounds in 1 minute at most. The self loading mechanism was the bottleneck, not how fast a person could pull the trigger.
The famous Lewis and Clark rifle was also about 20 rounds in 1 minute. It was also an air rifle that required air reservoirs that were hand pumped ahead of time. Literally would sit there over 20 minutes to pump one reservoir. You inserted a full reservoir in the rifle to actuate the self loading mechanism. The reservoir and rifle had to be well maintained since leakage was a common issue. It was barely self loading most of the time.
And no, they weren't the same rifle. The Lewis and Clark rifle was invented after the Declaration of Independence.
Instead of making up history in your head and calling other ignorant, maybe go read about actual history.
@@flewkisdead it was a Giradoni Air Rifle that was made used by the Austrian Army. It WAS the same rifle given to Lewis and Clark and was fully capable of what I claimed. Your bullshit pathetic attempt to pretend what I said is false is flat out wrong and your explanation is lacking. Just because it wasn't up to snuff with today's rifles doesn't mean that the founding fathers couldn't envision guns capable of firing multiple shots without reloading in rapid succession like leftist like you always try to claim. My comment was 100% accurate and the implications were also correct. The founding father absolutely without a doubt could imagine weapons capable of what we have today and much more than a muzzle load musket like you all like to claim. The rifle I am talking about pre dates the bill of rights jackass you know the document that enshrined things like freedom of speech and the right to bear arms...
@@flewkisdead God I can't stop laughing at how wrong your entire rant was. The constitution has nothing to do with the enshrined of our rights and has absolutely zero bearing on the conversation. That rifle was in service for years before the CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS were written and it was the same rifle Jefferson gave Lewis and Clark. Instead of rewriting history to try and make your argument sound less idiotic and uninformed.
@@blairpenny1526 I like how you think the declaration of Independence = constitution. Yeah. We got a real history buff here.
Can we just take a moment and appreciate the costumes☺️.
Notice how he's just congressman "Peele" here
Maybe Jordan is actually a time traveller and is trying to warn us with these skits 🤔🤔
Lol wouldnt be surprised
Brodutcs WHAT the actual hell are your videoes?😂 are u a time traveller too?
@@mcpopo6728 🤮
@@mcpopo6728 i might be
Bro... it's a canon event
- Miguel O'Hara
Imagine doing this several times only for miniature Death Stars or Halo Rings to show up
*Sees destroyed document. Constructs new one*
“Ok, gentlemen! Where were we? Ah yes, your signatures please.”
People owned naval ships with cannons back then. It covered them too.
thank you. if you owned an armed ship back then, but now if you mention something like that, you'd get scoffed by folks. probably those on the left. is the govn any less of a threat now? nope. our ability to keep our own overpaid, overreaching, overtaxing, over-regulating govn in check has diminished and will continue with crap like this being pushed out. K&P starting to virtue signal and I'm about to tune the F off.
"But... the 2nd Amendment was ONLY meant to cover muskets." The 1st amendment should only protect a quill pen and ink then. There's NO WAY that they could have ever imagined instant communication and voicing of ones own opinions via the internet, cell phone, etc and everyone having the capability to voice their grievances in the public square.
Yes, you're right. We must do something to stop the scores of attacks committed every year on innocent civilians by unlicensed gunboats. I can't even walk down the street for fear of some scurvy dog sailing his father's battleship into an office building and unleashing broadside on an unsuspecting crowd.
@@drakesdrum1 You have basically just explained why no regulations are needed for the AR15 and why fear of it is unfounded. Please look up what percentage of gun deaths annually is attributed to the dreaded AR15. Here is a hint (since you probably won't look it up) it's a very, very, VERRRRYYY small number.
@@YippeeKiYayMrFalcon How are you capable of defending countless deaths of literal children for the right to what, kill more people?
Except they could imagine. Puckle gun, girandoni air rifle, pepper box revolvers. All existed prior.
To be honest the founders were used to bloodshed, they had just fought a very bloody war. A cannon, even a small cannon, could kill or mame many people with one shot. They had black powder firearms that were capable of firing multiple shots without reloading. They knew that firearms would definitely progress technologically.
I'm sure this comment section will remain absolutely conflict-free.
hold my beer
Epstein didn't kill himself!
Oh yes, I'm sure it will !
How would you know? Are you somehow from.....the future?
I'm offended
If that was really historical moment, those people will wonder what those two colored gentlemen are doing there.
all men are created equal
@@burritodog3634 yeah, but it's not historically accurate for that time.
@@sorrowthendeath I think he is being sarcastic.
AlucardAFT3003 are you sure?
@@flabio7074 I'm willing to be proven wrong. But as far as I'm concerned, there were no black men when the Constitution was being written... that's why BLM claims inequality and colonization after all... even when it's just a front for a Marxist organization that cares not for black lives.
Plot Twist: "Congressman" Key was a time-traveler from a future where Peele managed to stop the amendment and wants to be able to do this
I love Key and Peele historic skits.
I guess Key & Peele haven't heard of the Puckle Gun and Gatling Gun.
The British Patriot the gatling gun was invented 100 years later sorry bud, nice try
I don't get it
Puckle gun was 1722 (public trial)
2nd amendment was 1791
Gatling gun 1861
The transfer of information then was slow.
And the puckle gun was never used.
I'm kind of curious how you'd think anyone could manage to get a Puckle Gun into a crowded area and kill scores of men before anyone had time to stop them? Do you think everyone in that crowded area is just going to stand back and obvious someone set up a giant gun on a tripod off in the (not too far) distance and just wonder what they're up to and do nothing?
The British Patriot 🇺🇳
HAHAHAHAHA DID U SEE THE MUSKETS HE HAD 😂 😂 💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
I'll bring my kalthoff repeating flintlock.
Giradi rifle that went west with Lewis and Clark could shoot 24 without reloading. The swiss (IIRC) had a repeating flintlock for their guard. They already knew about multi shot firearms and were some of the inventors of tech.
This skit can be sumed up in one word.
CONSEQUENCES
“A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies.” - George Washington
The militia part is forgotten quite often.
more history on the right and responsibility of all able bodied men (aka the militia) to be armed and train czcams.com/video/9kWW_y5deeg/video.html
"What if someone made a gun that could shoot say, 50 people in 30 seconds?"
George Washington: "Ngl that'd be sick af bro"
*Destroying gun rights with guns*
Palpatine: Ironic
The founding fathers were actually fond of firearms that shot more than one shot. Different prototypes were made back then. However they were very impractical. So this video is actually accurate to how they'd react
Its not cause he would get shot, since people carried their guns
@@tiagomoraes1510 Huh?
He would get shot, since people used to carry their guns, i doubt everyone in the room was without a gun @@anti1training
I used the second amendment to destroy the second amendment
This was hilarious. And very accurate. The founding fathers already knew what would happen. They weren't dumb. They had semi automatic weapons.
and gatling guns
Certainly not Gatling guns yet but there were prototypes for a semi automatic rifle, the puckle gun. They wanted to get some for the military but they were too expensive. People from the past weren’t stupid. They knew firearms would keep advancing, maybe not when/how we would use them but they guessed it would just like we imagine futuristic guns
@@Mustang-wt1se when I say Gatling I mean the blanket term for revolving cylinder machine gun. In this case, that's the pickle gun, it's automatic.
@@Mustang-wt1se oh, there were others that weren't just prototypes. And yes, they did want them, just couldn't afford them. People don't seem to realize that there were more advanced guns than just muskets.
The point of the second amendment flew over there heads
They know what the 2nd amendment says. The point they're making is whether it's a good tradeoff to allow such guns for "protection" when they can be used to cause so much harm. I live in Europe where I can't own a gun but that doesn't make me any less free than Americans. In fact I would argue I feel much safer when there was no risk of dying in a school shooting. And don't get me started on fighting a tyrannical government BS. That may have made sense in a young and recently independent democracy, but the democratic institutions are way too resilient to allow a tyrannical government in the 21st century.
@@late8641
Average (Mean) Annual Death Rate per Million People from Mass Public Shootings (U.S., Canada, and Europe, 2009-2015):
1st Norway - 1.888
2nd Serbia - 0.381
3rd France - 0.347
4th Macedonia - 0.337
5th Albania - 0.206
6th Slovakia - 0.185
7th Switzerland - 0.142
8th Finland - 0.132
9th Belgium - 0.128
10th Czech Republic - 0.123
11th United States - 0.089
12th Austria - 0.068
13th Netherlands - 0.051
14th Canada - 0.032
15th England - 0.027
16th Germany - 0.023
17th Russia - 0.012
18th Italy - 0.009
Frequency per million people of mass public shootings from 2009 to 2015
1st Macedonia - 0.471
2nd Albania - 0.360
3rd Serbia - 0.281
4th Switzerland - 0.249
5th Norway - 0.197
6th Slovakia - 0.185
7th Finland - 0.184
8th Belgium - 0.179
9th Austria - 0.119
10th Czech Republic - 0.096
11th France - 0.092
12th USA - 0.078
13th Netherlands - 0.059
14th Canada - 0.056
15th Italy - 0.017
16th England - 0.015
17th Russia- 0.014
18th Germany - 0.013
@@late8641
The defintion they used.
Mass public shootings - defined as four or more people killed in a public place, and not in the course of committing another crime, and not involving struggles over sovereignty. The focus on excluding shootings that do not involve other crimes (e.g., gang fights or robberies) has been used from the original research by Lott and Landes to more recently the FBI.
Gun that could shoot 50 people at once...
Cannon stuffed with 500 musket balls, let me introduce myself.
Or if you don't have any musket balls, use forks, nails, and other scrap like William "one shot" Dodson.
@James D tf do ypu think a cannon is? it is a gun.
Puckle gun leans around corner....
czcams.com/play/PLZOMlO2_17fvIiTRFiQ9C2OqfGER03v4G.html
I'd like to see your opinion on theese set of videos.
I'll look for your coments under them.
:
@@bpurple7263 we're those videos for me??
“That’s not how time travel works, you change the past but it’s not your past. Your past is in the past and already happened to you. Your making a new past that can’t affect your present or their future. Back to the future lied to you”
~ Shrek
Shrek? Don't know about that but sounds like DBZ timelines as well
Obviously it depends on what time travel theory it's based on, but yes lol
Seriously, we need this movie.
I love the fact that everyone in the comments not only enjoyed the skit but all agree that this is pretty much spot on