- 93
- 549 077
Carnie 2021 Syntax 4th Edition
United States
Registrace 9. 06. 2019
This channel is for videos to go along with the 4th edition of Syntax: A Generative Introduction. Carnie, Andrew (2021) and the second edition of Carnie, Andrew (2021) The Syntax Workbook.
Unfortunately I am not able to answer your individual questions about your homework or classes, unless you are a University of Arizona student. If you are a student elsewhere, please direct all questions to your professor or tutor.
Unfortunately I am not able to answer your individual questions about your homework or classes, unless you are a University of Arizona student. If you are a student elsewhere, please direct all questions to your professor or tutor.
Carnie (2021) The Syntax Workbook, Exercise. WBE3 3
Carnie (2021) The Syntax Workbook, Exercise. WBE3 3
Please purchase the book: www.wiley.com/en-us/The+Syntax+Workbook%3A+A+Companion+to+Carnie%27s+Syntax%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9781119569282
Please purchase the book: www.wiley.com/en-us/The+Syntax+Workbook%3A+A+Companion+to+Carnie%27s+Syntax%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9781119569282
zhlédnutí: 1 021
Video
Carnie (2021) The Syntax Workbook. Exercise WBE3 2
zhlédnutí 666Před 8 měsíci
This video reviews the tree drawing exercise of PPs in Carnie (20210 the Syntax Workbook exercise WBE3.2 Please purchase the book: www.wiley.com/en-us/The Syntax Workbook: A Companion to Carnie's Syntax, 2nd Edition-p-9781119569282
Workbook Exercise, Chapter 3, WBE3.1
zhlédnutí 994Před 9 měsíci
I draw the trees from Workbook Exercise WBE3.1: NPs, AdjPs, AdvPs Please purchase the book: www.wiley.com/en-us/The Syntax Workbook: A Companion to Carnie's Syntax, 2nd Edition-p-9781119569282
Large Language Models and Generative Grammar
zhlédnutí 3,3KPřed rokem
This video covers a recent topic of interest that is not addressed in the textbook itself. It looks at the question of whether LLMs like ChatGPT constitute a real challenge to Generative Grammar, particularly with respect to the issues of Universal Grammar and Structural Dependence (i.e. are the principles underlying human syntax deterministic and rule-based or are they probabilistic and based ...
Video 19.3: Internal Merge
zhlédnutí 4,6KPřed 3 lety
Andrew Carnie presents Syntax: A Generative Introduction. 4th Edition. (2021) Wiley Blackwell. Video 19.3: Internal Merge The movement rule of chapter 13 called Move (which subsumes head movement, DP movement and Wh-movement) can be seen as a type of merge where instead of merging two completely different structures you merge a copy of something that is already contained inside the structure. P...
Video 19.2: Merge And Adjuncts
zhlédnutí 2KPřed 3 lety
Andrew Carnie presents Syntax: A Generative Introduction. 4th Edition. (2021). Wiley Blackwell. Video 19.2: Merge And Adjuncts The problem of adjuncts with Merge is explored. It's suggested that perhaps adjuncts are introduced by overlapping (rather than embedded) sets. Please purchase the book: www.wiley.com/en-us/Syntax: A Generative Introduction, 4th Edition-p-9781119569312
Video 19.1: External Merge
zhlédnutí 4,5KPřed 3 lety
Andrew Carnie presents Syntax: A Generative Introduction. 4th Edition (2021). Wiley Blackwell. Video 19.1: External Merge Chapter 19 looks at the Minimalist theory of Merge, which tries to derive X-bar theoretic notions from otherwise motivated things we need. X-bar is shown to derive from the mathematical notion of set formation and the differences between X heads, X's, and XPs, follows from t...
Video 18.5: Non-configurationality
zhlédnutí 1,2KPřed 3 lety
Andrew Carnie presents Syntax: A Generative Introduction 4th Edition (2021). Wiley-Blackwell. Video 18.5: Non-configurationality The phenomenon of non-configurationality (which is both relatively free word order and a loose use of constituency) is proposed. Three hypotheses are presented. The Dual Structure approaches. The Pronominal Argument Hypothesis and Discourse driven Movement (Scrambling...
Video 18.4: Scrambling
zhlédnutí 1KPřed 3 lety
Andrew Carnie presents Syntax: A Generative Introduction 4th Edition (2021). Wiley-Blackwell. Video 18.4: Scrambling Scrambling is the phenomenon where languages exhibit relatively free word order. In this video it's suggested that in languages like Japanese the scrambled word orders are created by movement of DPs in topic and focus positions in the tree.
Video 18.3: Incorporation
zhlédnutí 809Před 3 lety
Andrew Carnie presents Syntax: A Generative Introduction 4th Edition (2021). Wiley Blackwell. Video 18.3: Incorporation In this video Carnie presents the phenomenon of Incorporation, where direct objects appear in the middle of verbal structure. An account is given in terms of head to head movement of the N head into the the V head. This predicts that non-head material like adjectives will be s...
Video 18.2: Polysynthesis
zhlédnutí 1,2KPřed 3 lety
Andrew Carnie presents Syntax: A Generative Introduction 4E (2021). Wiley Blackwell. Video 18.2: Polysynthesis This video explores the phenomenon of Polysynthesis where the work of what is done by Syntax in the languages we've been looking at up to now is actually done by the morphology. Whole sentences are bundled into single words. The video explains two hypotheses about this: The Syntax Free...
Video 18.1 Languages With Looser Constituency
zhlédnutí 933Před 3 lety
Andrew Carnie presents Syntax: A Generative Introduction. 4th Edition, (2021) Wiley Blackwell. Video 18.1 Languages With Looser Constituency This video introduces the challenges that languages with much looser constituency pose to the configurational-centric approach taken throughout the rest of the book, where word order and constituency are taken as definitional in Syntax (through X-bar theor...
Video 17.2: Rethinking the Definition Of Binding Domain
zhlédnutí 1,6KPřed 3 lety
Andrew Carnie presents Syntax: A Generative Introduction. 4E. (2021). Wiley Blackwell. Video 17.2: Rethinking the Definition Of Binding Domain This video starts with the presentation of 3 cases where the definition of binding domain as the CP dominating the anaphor or pronoun is challenging. Building up Chomsky's work in "Knowledge of Language" (KOL), an alternative set of definitions are propo...
Video 17.1: Advanced Binding Theory: Levels Of Representation
zhlédnutí 2,4KPřed 3 lety
Andrew Carnie presents Syntax: A Generative Introduction. 4E. (2021) Wiley Blackwell. Video 17.1: Advanced Binding Theory: Levels Of Representation This video takes another look at binding and asks how it interacts with our theory of movement and the levels of representation we have (D-structure, PF, LF). A paradox is presented where the binding conditions can be shown to hold both before and a...
Video 16.4: Pseudogapping
zhlédnutí 904Před 3 lety
Andrew Carnie presents Syntax: A Generative Introduction. 4E. Wiley-Blackwell. Video 16.4: Pseudogapping This video compares two hypothesis on pseudogapping or non-constituent ellipsis, where only the direct object survives VP ellipsis. Lasnik's proposal that the direct object shifts into the specifer of AgrOP, thus escaping the ellipsis is presented and compared to Agbayani and Zoerner's hypot...
Video 16.3: Avoiding circularity in Antecedent Contained Deletion
zhlédnutí 903Před 3 lety
Video 16.3: Avoiding circularity in Antecedent Contained Deletion
Video 15.2: Subject to Object Raising and Object Control
zhlédnutí 4,4KPřed 3 lety
Video 15.2: Subject to Object Raising and Object Control
Video 15.1 Distinguishing Raising from Control
zhlédnutí 7KPřed 3 lety
Video 15.1 Distinguishing Raising from Control
Voice 14.2 Explaining Double Object Verbs using the VoiceP
zhlédnutí 2,2KPřed 3 lety
Voice 14.2 Explaining Double Object Verbs using the VoiceP
Video 14.1 The Puzzle Of Double Objects
zhlédnutí 3,2KPřed 3 lety
Video 14.1 The Puzzle Of Double Objects
Video 13.3 Overt and Covert Movement: Explaining Cross-Linguistic Variation
zhlédnutí 4,1KPřed 3 lety
Video 13.3 Overt and Covert Movement: Explaining Cross-Linguistic Variation
Video 12.9: The Minimal Link Condition
zhlédnutí 3,7KPřed 3 lety
Video 12.9: The Minimal Link Condition
A very nice explanation of the mechanics of the phrase structure rules. I only have one question: Who says that the rules should be so? With the CP and not a TP embedded into a VP, and all like that? You mentioned something like 'It should be like this bc the rule says so.' But HOW do we know what the rule says?
The rules are determined empirically by analyzing the data and employing constituency test to test our hypotheses.
@@CarnieSyntaxthEdition OK, got that. Thank you for taking the time to reply. And also special thanks for taking the time to record this course. It is very useful. :)
Iam reading of your book. Suprisingly, there is 4book edition. Iam big fans. Iam from Indonesia
❤🎉thank you very much
Thank you for this class.
Thank you for this detailed and helpful explanation, Prof Carnie!
thankyou you saved my degree
Informative! Thanks for uploading these videos.
How about undergeneration?
See chapters 10-18
Hello, professor, thank you for the course, and I have two questions. 1. If the subject is introduced by the VoiceP instead of the VP, why do we still need the specifier of VP in the tree? 2. I wonder if there is any evidence of a VoiceP, such as the passive, banning the assignment of accusative case of its component VP?
Hi, The answers to both your questions are dealt with in Chapter 14.
Hello ! The trees in the textbook (for exemple page 284, 4th edition) and in the video include all the types of phrases with modals (PerfP, ProgP, VoiceP) while the answer to the WBE15, chapter 9 (Workbook, page 104) has some VPs instead. May anyone explain me the difference and telle my why the tree in the answer is not like the trees in the Textbook ? Many thanks in advance !
It sounds like you might be using the old edition of the workbook. The 4th edition of the textbook goes along with the *second* edition of the workbook (which has a red cover) as opposed to the 1st edition of the workbook (which has a grey/green cover). The stacked VPs are an older analysis of how the auxiliary system worked. More recent approaches have replaced these with PerfP, ProgP, and VoiceP. The textbook 3E and workbook 1E used stacked VPs. The textbook 4E and workbook 2E used PerfP etc. The two editions were published about 10 years apart and practice in the discipline shifted during this time so the 4th edition was updated in this regard.
@@CarnieSyntaxthEdition Oh, now I see. Yes, indeed, I am using the first edition of the workbook. Many thanks !
Thank u so much
Thank you so much Professor!
youre like a celebrity to me LMAO thank you andrew carnie for your awesome books and videos
fr hes my beyonce
You’re a lifesaver, thank you!
Thank you! I have a question. Whats the property that "all" has and that can make it stay there in VoiceP. Why doesnt it raise along with "the men" altogether
There are a number of possibilities here. The simplest reason would be that DP and QP have different case marking requirements. The D head requires case, so it has to move. The "all" (Q), does't require case so it can strand. In the cases where it does move it "Pied pipes", which is a property familiar from wh-movement, where a preposition can either move with the wh-phrase or be stranded (To whom did you give the book vs. Who did you give the book to). The preposition can "pied pipe" up with the element requiring wh-checking or it can be stranded. The All in Quantifier float might have the same properties, it can pied pipe or it can be stranded. There's a vast lit on Pied piping.
This is amazingly helpful!
Nice explanation and a great example at the end👌👌
Arguably the best video course series on CZcams! Thanks so much!
It was a useful lesson, thank you Prof❤❤❤
Thank you, Professor!
Thank you man.
"Thank you, man"?! He IS The Man!
Seriously, all of this seems a lot much easier than I thouhgt
True.
Very fun lecture, I really liked example 4
This is exactly what I've been looking for!
You do all prof
👍👍
Thoroughly explained and illustrated. Thanks for bringing these seemingly distant concepts within reach.
you saved me ! thank you
Very clear explanation. Thank you for making this video!
Good Job
Thank you so much!
Thank you for this 🙏
Carnie, you did a wonderful thing to make videos on your book on Syntax
Im MA student and sure this content is amazing
About 9 years ago read your book on syntax.... struggled with X-bar Theory.....now today I bumped into your channel; a happy surprise!
In the last 13 minutes I learned way more things than I'd done in a 1.5 h lecture.
Thank you so much for the video!
it's fantastic that you created this channel!
This video is really helpful!!
HI Carnie , I have been following you continuously for more than a year. I work in the Google Speak section and I am also a researcher and instructor in the field of SEO, which mainly focuses on semantic SEO. I wanted to thank you for your excellent book and flawless teaching.
Thanks a lot, professor, really useful. Regards from Mexico.
The A-condition example is amazing! I used a similar example on Bing AI and it also fell for it
Thank you for this video and series! I am currently in seminary studying Koine greek and hope to apply these principles to my translation work.
Hello Andrew, Thank you so much for continuing to update this series. I am currently learning x-bar theroy, your textbooks and videos have given me a lot of help! Appreciate your time and kindness. I wish you all the best.
Your series of videos are helping me incredibly to study for my syntax exams. Thank you so much for taking the time to provide such amazing explanations about these topics. Wish you all the best with the book and your classes.
Great video👍
thank you soooo much
this is a really good video, thank you
Wow wow wow🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉I am studying ur book now!!! It is really exciting to see ur direct lecture!!
Thank you for this educational video! It really helps a lot! But I do have a question if it's okay, I am still confused about the term "prominence". Is it also a relationship of nodes like Dominance, Precedence and C-Command? What is it's connection to C-Command?
Prominence is not a structural relation. But it is a generic term that refers to the relative “importance” of an item. It is not usually structurally defined. But typically on can say that a dominator is more promenant than the thing it dominates; the item that precedes another is more promenant than the item it precedes; and a c-commander is more promenant than the item it c-commands. But again prominence is not defined in the theory and it has no ontological status in the theory described in the book. It’s just a generic descriptor for “more important” which often correlates to “higher up” or “to the left”.