Video

Absolutely, yes.

Yes, it will definitely work on a Stelvio for sure. Most if not all the performance related parts are interchangeable between the Giulia and Stelvio.

Me too!

No extra power in Drag mode (not anymore than would be in Track mode), which is why we didn't publish that test. The Drag mode changes have more to do with throttle response and shift mapping, steering, torque reserve, etc. No real changes to peak torque and power for the purposes of this kind of testing. Now if we were at the drag strip, it's possible drag mode would produce the best results because of the changes outlined.

​@EUROCOMPULSION Every time I've run my 2020 or 2021 Ecoboost in drag mode, I've never gotten good results. Just straight sport mode with traction control off has always been given me the best. Any reason why? I'd say I'm no expert in drag racing lol. And it's just a brand new perfectly flat side street im driving on.

Probably outrun your Chevy bolt

This is a ram air intake, different from a normal intake. They offer some for 500$ but those don’t use cold air, just boxed temp. That’s because you have to get rid of the stock intake tube that feeds the air intake. This one is designed to fit with oem air duct, and provides a longer filter instead, hence the “v4” just means their latest design. You can still buy old design, but on paper this type of intake actually provides improved efficiency and performance, 800 is pretty entry level considering it’s a 40-50k new car. Picked one up for 22k with only 23k miles. Next is turbo upgrade!

@@Dr.reese_UBR3 ​​⁠i understand the difference between a true cold air and a ram hot box. This intake is identical to the previous minus the housing but then again it’s only a matter of time before this material surrounding the filter gets hot being so close to the engine still and begins to heat soak. again 800 bucks is not entry level by any means when 90 percent of the highest branded intakes for my m4 range from 4-600 and the m4 is actually worth the money u stated. 800 for a guilia not even a qv is not worth it. guilias can be found anywhere from 20-35k almost brand new. those cars make crap for power and 800 bucks will net u next to nothing.

@@1state152 it will still beat 85% of the cars on the road, as for track…. Maybe 5% 😂 also this engine isn’t producing the amount of heat you think it is… have you seen them up close? There’s almost a full arm length from the radiator to the front on the intake… it’s not the v6 one. That one basically has no space in the engine bay, this is fully enclosed and will definitely be cooler than stock abs plastic

First off, we didn't apply any loss corrections. The dyno reads the dissipation (drive train loss) for a given gear, and applies the correction it detects at any given moment. We explained that in the video, but what you're seeing is what the dyno detected. Secondly, drivetrain loss is not necessarily a fixed # across the power band (I don't know if people know this or not). Dissipation is linear in nature, and dependent upon the gear, rpm/speed/load, and the amount of power generated at a given rpm/moment in the powerband. A peak drivetrain loss happens near peak power and near the upper part of the powerband, depending on gear and speed. At a lower rpm/speed, the dissipation is not as high (for example, where you would see peak torque occurring or just before). The dyno detects and measures the resistance through the powertrain going from redline back to below the starting rpm for the dyno run. Resistance/dissipation is less at that point in the power band. Again, mentioned in the video, this is why we don't solely go off of the flywheel hp data. There are too many variables involved, it's only a small part of the bigger picture. We only show them at the end so everyone else can see them. EDIT: Look at the WHP charts in the video, the lines at the bottom show the dissipation reading throughout the run.

Honestly, I haven't paid attention to that at all. I will check and see the next time we fill up.

If you talking about fuel economy is the same I have a 2023 before and now 2024 my new is making 21 by gallons with only 350 miles in odometer, my old 2023 mark 22.3 miles by gallons .

@@Hersses-tech I have noticed that the 2024 runs a bit richer for longer across the middle to top end of the powerband.

Yes, it has our tune as well.

It should be in the closed position when the engine is off. It should only open when the pressure that it is meant to open at is met.

Your mom is calling you kid, shut off your xbox and wash up!

Thank you for taking the time to comment and tell us your thoughts 🙃

Style is subjective, and nobody ever claimed the Mustang EB is a muscle car. If you like 200 less pounds on the nose for better handling, yet appreciate the strong S550/S650 chassis…

Muscle is in the exterior style first and foremost imo. The rest about cars is just so damn hard to objectify. They have V8s in NON-muscle cars all over, so that's not a great way to value it.

My personal opinion is yes. I think the S650 has a better base platform to build off for performance, and just superior drivability. It's fantastic to drive. I would say both the Ecoboost and the GT are better options than the V6 (overall, all things considered). You really cannot go wrong with either one. I wasn't expecting such a huge difference between my 2018 and the 2024, it was a bit surprising how much better the 2024 is. There's absolutely nothing wrong with the V6, it has its place, but worth upgrading? Definitely.

It's probably hard to tell without seeing it in person (and holding it in your hands) but the filter and canister are huge. They aren't tiny openings, they're about 4 inches in diameter. The canister design is as such that it allows the air to swirl through the box, gaining velocity. This thing is anything but short on air flow. The ram air piece connects directly at the factory ram air duct inlet at the front of the car, go to the link in the description, you can see photos off the car in technical section. There's no sound clips because there isn't much, the entire thing is sealed. This is why we have the V2 intake, for people that care about sound, the V4 is for people who want max performance (regardless of sound).

Yes, it does. And they work well (shifting is faster and better than the previous gen 10speed cars).

No

No, I think that the car will perform just fine on 91, the primary issue is cooling. Front bumper is off and the intercooler just isn't large enough to handle what the car is truly capable of, similar to the previous generation. Keep the temps down, upgraded intercooler and all of sudden a whole new world of performance opens up, even on 91 octane. Didn't test Drag Strip mode for the dyno, because the majority of the changes in Drag Strip mode are down to throttle masking, drivability masking, and transmission characteristics. The car is faster in that mode over a series of gears and rpm ranges, not through a single gear pull like we would be doing on the dyno. You can expect the tuning parameters in Track mode to be similar to Drag mode, being familiar with the ECU and tuning, and the previous generation ecoboosts ECUs, that's how they have always done it and seem to be doing it on this generation as well. So a dyno of Drag Strip mode over a 1 gear pull would not have yielded anything much different than you see in track mode.

Those 4.5 numbers are a hoax. I'm seeing real world numbers on the OE tire more in the low 5's.

It's not a hoax I got 4.64 in my 24 EcoBoost I will post it soon but go to my page I have a video getting 4.72 ​@@michaelfried3123

There's a link in the video description to our dyno database on our site. You can see the charts really big there if these are difficult to see in the video.

I hear you, there's nothing quite like a V8 sound at full tilt! But Ford definitely didn't overlook this engine setup, even though it's technically the base model now. It's very solid and performs well.

Throw a turbo on the coyote and watch it make 150hp per liter

100 hp per liter ain’t shit and these numbers aren’t impressive by any means

@@GoGoggansGo compared to the CTR, GTI, and SI it is and cheaper 🤡🤡

Definitely, and you can feel it while driving on the road, it's a noticeable difference. The torque is more linear and smooth, especially in the midrange. They aren't dumping fuel as early in the rpm range as they did on the previous gen, and there's a bit more peak boost as well, so that may be contributing.

We ran with 91 octane on these runs, that's the most common premium around us (with exception to one station I know of that has 93 octane). We mention this in the full dyno video, which I will link below. czcams.com/video/ed44LnryUSs/video.html

93 in turbo cars will always give better results, the hotter the climate the higher octane really as it is prone to pre-ignite with lower octane fuels

I'm sure Toby will dyno it on 93 so real data will be coming. My guess is that under high heat conditions 93 will be a little better but in normal temps, like 80F and below I doubt it will matter much .

Yes, as someone else mentioned, the hotter the climate and higher humidity, higher octane will always yield more knock protection and more consistent performance on a turbocharged car. Below 75F and the comparison will be only slightly different, but it definitely makes a difference in certain conditions. We will likely do some testing on 93 octane as well, but I always start tune development on 91 octane, as that is usually the minimum premium anyone has access to, and by doing this I can ensure it runs safely on the minimum required octane.

Well they've got the GT for that.

so original lol

We'll call it 'Murca Division

@@EUROCOMPULSION What the F#%@ is a Kilometer!!

@@WillHughesTV 🤣There are many things I can appreciate about the metric system...the kilometer is not one of them.

Have the Ecms been unlocked yet?

2021 Mach 1 owner here, Great explanation regarding your dyno specifics. Greg if you are interested in 4 cylinder Mustangs, the previous generations HPP Ecoboost with the 2.3L 330hp 350tq seems like a pretty cool car.

@ThomisticAmerican13FOX Thanks Thomas, we already have a 2018 and a 2024, I do like the cars. Our 2018 has quite a bit more power than stock, but it's Toby's job to talk about that when the time is right @@ThomisticAmerican13FOX

link is in the bio

We had it custom fabricated. So it's a one off.

With the standard Centerline setup (and normal exhaust tips) it should be legal. The catted downpipe is 400cel, and should also be legal (it does not throw any CELs). However it is currently unavailable, there are some revisions happening with the Magnaflow catalyst.