The teacher's accent is so soothing and accurate , the confidence and clarity in his voice are the best things to listen to,my respect for you mister .
I can't express my appreciation to you, Mr. Ashworth, in words alone. You literally saved me many times, and you had me become obsessed with Linguistics in general, and Pragmatics in particular.
This channel has been so helpful to me this semester. I wish I had discovered you earlier. You make this content so easy to consume. Sitting my last last paper in Semantics and Pragmatics tomorrow. This just helped me answer a question on invoking implicatures and implicature utilization in maxim clash. Thank you Mr.Ashworth❤
Hi Mr. Ashworth. I just want to say thank you so much because your videos literally SAVED my life! I love to watch your videos especially during my examination week ( actually my exam is tomorrow😂) , because it's so soothing and easy to understand. I really hope that you will keep posting more videos and discuss about more topics in the future! Once again, thanks Mr. Ashworth and have great day. Greetings from Malaysia 💕 !
Sir, your way of explaining is beautiful and your videos are very useful. I hope you come back soon to make new videos and continue your good job ،Thank you for your efforts.
Hello, Professor Evan, Let me first say that your way of delivering the information is unique and informative. I have a humble request, I am doing a master in English linguistics, so could you be my supervisor?
@Evan Ashworth Multiple thanks, professor. I do understand that you might be a lot busy, and I realise that I am not lucky enough to have you as my advisor. Thank you again.
Hello Man, Thanks for sharing this! By the way, which one of the followings is correct 1. Write the note neatly 2. write the note neat in the first example "neatly" is working as an adverb that how the note should be written. But I was wondering in the second example the adjective "neat" is used as an object complement that to state what the object "the note" has to become. but on the other hand, The second example sounds strange. Please help me with this that will make me so grateful to you.
Hello! Prescriptively, the first example is "correct", but for linguists, the second example is just fine, as both examples mean the same thing. I hope that helps!
La intencionalidad es definida en la tradición psicologista como una propiedad de la mente (o conciencia) que consiste en que sus estados (los estados de conciencia o mentales) están dirigidos hacia algo, se relacionen o traten acerca de algo, que es su contenido u objeto intencional. Pero este objeto intencional es algo exclusivamente mental, retengamos esto. El lenguaje se encarga de expresar solo ese contenido mental y no una realidad del mundo externa a la mente, con su valor de verdad o falsedad. Siempre que pienso, pienso algo. No es posible pensamiento sin contenido. Pero ¿cómo se relaciona este psicologismo con la filosofía del lenguaje de Grice? ¿Cómo se establece la relación significado-mente? Pues bien, de modo tradicional, el estudio de la mente y de los conceptos o contenidos mentales se ha basado en el estudio de su expresión en el lenguaje, en el análisis de cómo el lenguaje expresa los contenidos mentales: cómo decimos las cosas que pensamos, de qué modo las expresamos. En este sentido, para Grice existen dos elementos del lenguaje que cumplen el rol de ejes referenciales: 1) las oraciones de actitud proposicional y 2) los nombres comunes (o términos generales).
I do have a couple neurolinguistics-related videos: "Psycholinguistics: Language and the Brain" and "Slips of the Tongue and Slips of the Ear", but I may try to create a dedicated video to neurolinguistics in the future. Thanks for watching!
Hi Evan, I love your videos! Do you have any textbook recommendation on English grammar/linguistics 101 for learners who do not major in English? Thanks in advance! I hope u have a nice day
Hi Soraya! The introductory linguistics textbooks I might recommend would be The Study of Language by George Yule and Language Files (published by Ohio State University). I hope that helps!
This is a great question, and my feeling is that other figures of speech can but don't always flout a maxim. However, for example, if the speaker piles on too many metaphors, the meaning could be easily lost on the addressee, so that might constitute a flouting (or probably a violation) of the maxim of manner (namely, the speaker is not "clear"). I hope that helps!
I have no plans to make a video on generative phonology, but I plan to make one on applied linguistics and, perhaps later on, one on cognitive linguistics.
Hi, teacher ...please, I am a Collage student and I am seeking for a recommendation which book that u recommend me to study to overcome problems I am facing with discourse analysis, I am lost with this subject . Indeed thank you 4 all❤.
Hello! I might suggest looking at Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method (1st edition) by Marianne W Jorgensen and Louise Phillips. I hope that helps!
Thanks a lot, sir. Please keep sharing more, they help a lot! A:What do you think of Evan Ashworth's videos on CZcams? B: Those videos are the shit, you gotta check them out ASAP. Without violating or flouting any of the maxims, right? :)
@@evanashworth490 What is the best model to follow in order to analyse intonation in terms of phono-pragmatic analysis. Furthermore, how can I design eclectic model concerning these two fields?
@@khuloodahmed2437 Whoa--sorry, that question is a bit outside my area of expertise, but I think you could use the transcription system devised by Jefferson and Schegloff which is used for conversation analysis. I'm not sure about your second question though, sorry.
Hi. When a final syllable is cut off , we call is 'apocope,. When the initial syllable is cut ofd, we call it "'syncope' How to call when the middle syllable is cut off?
Sure! Consider the example below in which speaker A is a teacher and speaker B is a 3rd grader: A: Do you have any questions about multiplication tables? B: Does 8 times 8 = 36? A: I cannot divulge the answer but you should eschew obfuscation by consulting your textbook. In the third line, speaker A isn't necessarily speaking too much (violating maxim of quantity), but they are definitely violating the maxim of manner by using unnecessarily complex language with a child, which creates confusion. I hope that helps!
This is actually a complicated question to answer. I had to look up what "zaddy" means, but if you mean to call me an attractive, older man (thanks!), then, I guess it's not entirely irrelevant because I just take it as a general compliment about the video. However, if you mean something else by "zaddy" (e.g., the sound a Cadillac makes when idling too low), then, yes, it would be a violation of the maxim of relation.
Hello there! I know I'm being late, but can someone here explain to me what it means to observe a maxim (and what is the non-observance of a maxim)? I don't understand that and I feel pretty stupid for that =-=
Hello. You're certainly not stupid! I describe the difference between violating and flouting a maxim in the video, and generally, non-observance of a maxim is either violating or flouting a maxim.
Hello Sir,I want to read this book name A comprehensive grammar of the English language written by Randolp qurik,but I found it difficult to understand, could you suggest me what are the topics in grammar I need to have better concept to understand this book.❤
Hello! Yes, Quirk can be difficult to read, and I think part of this has to do with the way Quirk writes and the time in which he was writing. I found it useful to have a strong grasp on a grammatical terminology (e.g., subordinate clauses, lexical categories).
Briefly, "violating" a maxim means breaking the rule of the maxim, but "flouting" only appears to break the rule of the maxim (by creating an implication that the listener/reader must figure out).
That looks like the maxim of manner is being flouted (not a serious violation to me) because the listener must use inference to determine that the speaker doesn't miss Mary.
Sure am! Also, from Language Files and A Concise Introduction to Linguistics. Covering content from introductory linguistics texts is one of the main purposes of this channel. Thanks for watching!
![PHILOSOPHY - Language: Gricean Pragmatics [HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/we6uSVf4qss/mqdefault.jpg)
The teacher's accent is so soothing and accurate , the confidence and clarity in his voice are the best things to listen to,my respect for you mister .
I can't express my appreciation to you, Mr. Ashworth, in words alone. You literally saved me many times, and you had me become obsessed with Linguistics in general, and Pragmatics in particular.
Hi you ...where you from ...I am Ola From Yemen.
hey, it's Doua from Algeria
@@user-vw9sl5oo9n
Youre the goat man. This is just what I needed after feeling down but still having to study.
Another great video by one of my fav linguistics channels! Please make more videos. Your videos really help me to keep my knowledge fresh! :)
This channel has been so helpful to me this semester. I wish I had discovered you earlier. You make this content so easy to consume. Sitting my last last paper in Semantics and Pragmatics tomorrow. This just helped me answer a question on invoking implicatures and implicature utilization in maxim clash. Thank you Mr.Ashworth❤
Hi Mr. Ashworth. I just want to say thank you so much because your videos literally SAVED my life! I love to watch your videos especially during my examination week ( actually my exam is tomorrow😂) , because it's so soothing and easy to understand. I really hope that you will keep posting more videos and discuss about more topics in the future! Once again, thanks Mr. Ashworth and have great day. Greetings from Malaysia 💕 !
Thank you! This was a perfect summary, just what I needed to judge whether I should pursue this idea further for my research.
It's sad there's no new videos on the channel, but thank you for what you were (or still are) doing
I hope to be back within the next few weeks 🙂
Loved this. Excellent and funny way to understand the cooperative principle.
Thank you so much, Mr. Evan. Greeting from Indonesia 👋
These videos are amazing for a linguistics student. I hope you begin to make videos again. Thank you very much, sir.
Welcome back 😊
I am M A student in linguistics, and you are the best thank you so much 🙏🏻
Your examples were life saving .. thank u
Thank you very much, I really like Your way of explaining, and I approve of your videos When I study for my exams.
Thank you for helping us,,i have a final exam tomorrow about cooperative Principle
and this video helpd me a lot. Thank you sir
Thank you! I study linguistics and i hope I’ll be a linguist in the future even though my country doesn’t support this science until now.
same here
Thank you so much for this video!!!!
Thank you sir for this, came at the right time 🙏🏽
Sir, your way of explaining is beautiful and your videos are very useful. I hope you come back soon to make new videos and continue your good job ،Thank you for your efforts.
A life saver💕
Hey your backkk😍😍😍 great videos ❤👍
This absolutely saved me! Thanks to you, Mr. Ashworth.
EXCELLENT TEACHER, SUBSCRIBED
Thanks!! I got a lot from this video :)
thanks alot for these videos
Great video 👍🏾
great video, thanks !!!!!!!
this is really helpful sir,
That kiss at the end😄
The best ❤️
loled at the end... man you're goat
thank you so much for helping us🤩
Gracias! Mejor explicado que un año de clases con mi profesora de oral 4,😅
Hi! We are looking forward to the upcoming videos as two linguistics students eager to learn. Pleaseee come back sir! 🥰
Thanks a lot!
veery useful thanks
Where are you new videos dear Evan? Is everything alright? Just a curious fan who wants to see more videos of you! Salute to the lecturer! :)
Thanks--the beginning of the semester here is hectic, but I hope to upload another video within a month. Thank you for being a subscriber!
Hello, Professor Evan,
Let me first say that your way of delivering the information is unique and informative.
I have a humble request, I am doing a master in English linguistics, so could you be my supervisor?
Hi Muhammad. I am honored by your request, but, unfortunately, I am not accepting new advisees at this time. Sorry about that!
@Evan Ashworth
Multiple thanks, professor.
I do understand that you might be a lot busy, and I realise that I am not lucky enough to have you as my advisor.
Thank you again.
Thank you so much for the information 🤧
Hello Man, Thanks for sharing this!
By the way, which one of the followings is correct
1. Write the note neatly
2. write the note neat
in the first example "neatly" is working as an adverb that how the note should be written.
But I was wondering in the second example the adjective "neat" is used as an object complement that to state what the object "the note" has to become.
but on the other hand, The second example sounds strange. Please help me with this that will make me so grateful to you.
Hello! Prescriptively, the first example is "correct", but for linguists, the second example is just fine, as both examples mean the same thing. I hope that helps!
I like the way you lecture
thank you
La intencionalidad es definida en la tradición psicologista como una propiedad de la mente (o conciencia) que consiste en que sus estados (los estados de conciencia o mentales) están dirigidos hacia algo, se relacionen o traten acerca de algo, que es su contenido u objeto intencional. Pero este objeto intencional es algo exclusivamente mental, retengamos esto. El lenguaje se encarga de expresar solo ese contenido mental y no una realidad del mundo externa a la mente, con su valor de verdad o falsedad. Siempre que pienso, pienso algo. No es posible pensamiento sin contenido. Pero ¿cómo se relaciona este psicologismo con la filosofía del lenguaje de Grice? ¿Cómo se establece la relación significado-mente? Pues bien, de modo tradicional, el estudio de la mente y de los conceptos o contenidos mentales se ha basado en el estudio de su expresión en el lenguaje, en el análisis de cómo el lenguaje expresa los contenidos mentales: cómo decimos las cosas que pensamos, de qué modo las expresamos. En este sentido, para Grice existen dos elementos del lenguaje que cumplen el rol de ejes referenciales: 1) las oraciones de actitud proposicional y 2) los nombres comunes (o términos generales).
Thank you Sir...
I would like to hear about Neuro-Linguistics from you. 🙏
I do have a couple neurolinguistics-related videos: "Psycholinguistics: Language and the Brain" and "Slips of the Tongue and Slips of the Ear", but I may try to create a dedicated video to neurolinguistics in the future. Thanks for watching!
Hi Evan, I love your videos! Do you have any textbook recommendation on English grammar/linguistics 101 for learners who do not major in English? Thanks in advance! I hope u have a nice day
Hi Soraya! The introductory linguistics textbooks I might recommend would be The Study of Language by George Yule and Language Files (published by Ohio State University). I hope that helps!
Nice 👌 thanks 😊
What about figures of speech, other than sarcasm, do they flout the maxims?
Hyperbole, metaphor, personification...
This is a great question, and my feeling is that other figures of speech can but don't always flout a maxim. However, for example, if the speaker piles on too many metaphors, the meaning could be easily lost on the addressee, so that might constitute a flouting (or probably a violation) of the maxim of manner (namely, the speaker is not "clear"). I hope that helps!
Surely you would be a better professor than that I have right now!! The current is an asshole... greatings bro :D
Excellent
Thanks bro
You’ve not made any video on applied linguistics, Generative phonology, Cognitive linguistics 💔😥.
I have no plans to make a video on generative phonology, but I plan to make one on applied linguistics and, perhaps later on, one on cognitive linguistics.
What’s the difference between relation and manner
Relation: stick to the point (don't talk about something i don't ask you about )
Manner : be clear ( not ambiguous )
Hi, teacher ...please, I am a Collage student and I am seeking for a recommendation which book that u recommend me to study to overcome problems I am facing with discourse analysis, I am lost with this subject .
Indeed thank you 4 all❤.
Hello! I might suggest looking at Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method (1st edition) by Marianne W Jorgensen and Louise Phillips. I hope that helps!
Thanks a lot, sir. Please keep sharing more, they help a lot!
A:What do you think of Evan Ashworth's videos on CZcams?
B: Those videos are the shit, you gotta check them out ASAP.
Without violating or flouting any of the maxims, right? :)
Thanksa lot Mr. Evan for your effort. Actually I have a question concerning phonology and pragmatics,and I'm all hope that you will help me🙏
Hi Khulood. I will try to help!
@@evanashworth490 What is the best model to follow in order to analyse intonation in terms of phono-pragmatic analysis. Furthermore, how can I design eclectic model concerning these two fields?
@@khuloodahmed2437 Whoa--sorry, that question is a bit outside my area of expertise, but I think you could use the transcription system devised by Jefferson and Schegloff which is used for conversation analysis. I'm not sure about your second question though, sorry.
Thank you... Teacher Evan
I would like to know... the types of Semantics?!?
Hi, Mohammed! I'm not sure if it will help, but I have a video on several topics in semantics called "lexical semantics"
Hi.
When a final syllable is cut off , we call is 'apocope,.
When the initial syllable is cut ofd, we call it "'syncope'
How to call when the middle syllable is cut off?
Hello! Syncope can also involve deletion from the middle of a word 🙂
@@evanashworth490 My bad. I am not sure about the cutting off initial syllable. How do we call when the initial syllable is cut off?
Great
Quantity and manner looks similar to each other for me. Can you explain the difference with one example, please?
Sure! Consider the example below in which speaker A is a teacher and speaker B is a 3rd grader:
A: Do you have any questions about multiplication tables?
B: Does 8 times 8 = 36?
A: I cannot divulge the answer but you should eschew obfuscation by consulting your textbook.
In the third line, speaker A isn't necessarily speaking too much (violating maxim of quantity), but they are definitely violating the maxim of manner by using unnecessarily complex language with a child, which creates confusion.
I hope that helps!
Please, could you explain how to get fuzzy expression from the text?
Hi! I'm not sure what you mean by "fuzzy expression"
Zaddy 🤩
(Was this a violation of the Maxim of Relation?)
This is actually a complicated question to answer. I had to look up what "zaddy" means, but if you mean to call me an attractive, older man (thanks!), then, I guess it's not entirely irrelevant because I just take it as a general compliment about the video. However, if you mean something else by "zaddy" (e.g., the sound a Cadillac makes when idling too low), then, yes, it would be a violation of the maxim of relation.
Hello there! I know I'm being late, but can someone here explain to me what it means to observe a maxim (and what is the non-observance of a maxim)? I don't understand that and I feel pretty stupid for that =-=
Hello. You're certainly not stupid! I describe the difference between violating and flouting a maxim in the video, and generally, non-observance of a maxim is either violating or flouting a maxim.
😂😂 love this
Hey,
Can you please do a video on approaches to Language analysis. Traditional grammar, structural grammar etc
Hello! I may make a video on this topic in the future.
I liked a LOT those long vídeos…
Thanks! I've just moved toward shorter videos because we humans tend to have short attention spans.
we contract is not as "isn't" and are not as "aren't". How do we contract am not is formal situation?
I suppose I would say, "I'm not..."
Hello Sir,I want to read this book name A comprehensive grammar of the English language written by Randolp qurik,but I found it difficult to understand, could you suggest me what are the topics in grammar I need to have better concept to understand this book.❤
Hello! Yes, Quirk can be difficult to read, and I think part of this has to do with the way Quirk writes and the time in which he was writing. I found it useful to have a strong grasp on a grammatical terminology (e.g., subordinate clauses, lexical categories).
The last one 😂
Ok sir, since nobody's ready to say it, I'll volunteer. You're hot, professor. Thanks!
Best
You're creative! Why taking so long to make videos for the channel!
Thanks! These just take a lot of time to create.
Can I show this video for my defence exam? Thank you! :)
I don't see why not--as long as you are defending, and not me!
I cannot make difference between flouting and violating maxims for All maxiems I have exams 😐can you explain it please
Briefly, "violating" a maxim means breaking the rule of the maxim, but "flouting" only appears to break the rule of the maxim (by creating an implication that the listener/reader must figure out).
I’m here from OAU dem wan kill me for this school 😫
A) we'll all miss john and mary,won't we?
B)well,we all miss john
Which maxim is violated at this example ?
That looks like the maxim of manner is being flouted (not a serious violation to me) because the listener must use inference to determine that the speaker doesn't miss Mary.
ADHD, aka we always flout the maxim of quantity.
Whatever. Excel·lent.
This dude is reading excerpts from George Yule's book "The study of language" 😆
Sure am! Also, from Language Files and A Concise Introduction to Linguistics. Covering content from introductory linguistics texts is one of the main purposes of this channel. Thanks for watching!
The best ❤️