Mark Zuckerberg"Meta Quest 3 is BETTER than Apple Vision Pro"
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 02. 2024
- Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg goes head-to-head with Apple's new Vision Pro headset, claiming the Meta Quest 3 is not just the better value, but the BETTER AR/VR PRODUCT overall, despite costing 7x less.
Here's why Meta Quest 3 reigns supreme, according to Zuck:
- Comfort is King: 120g lighter, wider field of view, and no wires to tangle you up.
- Sharper Visuals: Brighter screen, crisper motion, and less distracting artifacts. ✨
- Controller & Hand Tracking: Precision controllers & accurate hand tracking for immersive gameplay. ️
- Content Library: Dive into a vast library of VR & AR experiences, plus watch CZcams & play Xbox anywhere!
- Open Ecosystem: Embrace the future of open innovation, not a closed system.
For more insights, visit EM360tech.com:
em360tech.com/tech-news
Video courtesy of Mark Zuckerberg's Instagram (@zuck):
zuck?hl=en
#applevisionpro #metaquest3 #vr - Věda a technologie
he straight up dropped the phrase "neural interface" . lmao wow
whos ready for SAO?
Can't wait to get a pop up ad in my brain suggesting me to buy the latest meta products☺️☺️☺️
You can do, invent, create whathever you want, 20 years later Apple will come with a similar product, 4x more expensive, nothing new, BUT as it's Apple whhoooow it's Revolutionary!!! Reminder, they presented the USB-C port as something cutting edge tech "iPhone 15 Pro Max with the new USB-C connector brings a huge leap in data transfer".....
Yes Exactly!
It's like when they released the iPhone in 2007 and competitor were much better and more powerful!
Could manage files, and share with bluetooth, Supported Flash player, had copy and paste, could RECORD video (with a better camera)!!
Or like when they presented a big ipod touch as a revolutionary tablet when competitor were real computer with windows!
\s
What was the real breakthrough? IMHO the usability, the interface, the input methods. They were TREMENDOUSLY better than competitors. Functionality and hardware came later, and often worse than competitor. I think that we have something similar here, a very good user interface. A very good passthrough. A very good input device.
iOS is now very behind Android. Worldwide it's a pretty big difference, they only have about 40% of the number of active Android devices that are out there. But even in the US alone, Android has surpassed iOS in the number of users. I don't get why Zuckerberg feels iOS's closed model "won" the mobile space. Also, the only reason they switched to USB-C is because they were forced to, if they still wanted to sell product in the EU. It is much better and I'd advertise the change too, but they'd still be using Lightning had they not been forced to change.
@@UnreasonableArticulo
I haven't said anything about that.. and I feel frustrated too about apple software in last years,
ANYWAY, answering your question:
The majority of them are low price smartphones. Crappy phones that don't let the company any margins. On high end smartphones apple has (sadly) a de facto monopoly.
Global Phone Profits: Apple 66%, Samsung 17%, Everyone Else: Unlucky 13% (a bit old, but it's still the same). And thats selling waaay less smartphones than others.
Thats why, corporate prospective, has won. Has won all.
Why does he look human now
They updated his firmware, so now he looks more humanized..
AI is getting better
He's nearing full assimilation. We're in the end times.
Meta an open model? Hah, good one.
Apple and Meta are good companies. Deep value
You're a deep value.
@@garrisonfjord I’m you?
@@DeepValueOptions No one is as shallow as me.
Bro thinks he is better than everyone 💀💀💀😭😭🙏🙏🙏@@garrisonfjord
Apple is worse
Note: this comment was written using an iPhone, and I also do not own any smartphone with android, and I think green bubbles look better
Like a French tech CZcamsr said (Leo from the tech maker channel go watch his content he ai translated a lot of his videos into English)
If the video was longer: Marc would have told Tim Cook to go Fu- uhhhhhh Cook himself
the look on a person wearing these headset is always weird... maybe Apple VR looks slightly better... but apart from it, I like the Quest 3 more, definitely planning to buy one... hope there's google earth applicaton there, since it looks stunning in VR...
There isn’t a google earth app sadly… it was a stunning app. Meta store doesn’t carry it right now
@@trevorbawks932 that's the reason not to buy, at least for me... :-(
We own Quest 3, and find it incredibly helpful for teachers and students who love to learn via accelerated learning methods. By mere virtue of it creating distraction-free, sensory-engaging experiences - which is ideal for transferring information into the brain. We're using apps like VirtualSpeech (improve your communication), BodySwap (real life communication situations and public speaking) and TaleSpin (similar to BodySwap). Benefits of all 3 apps, pass over into real life. Which is truly a dream come true for avid learners. We don't use Quest 3 for entertainment, so no comment on that. But for learning, it's 10/10 product. Even if Apple Vision Pro were to bring those apps into it's store, we'd have 0% reason to switch over. Quest 3 already does the job, is light and pleasing to wear. Thank you Meta.
VR on meta wins for sure
By YouSum Live
00:00:00 Quest is superior to Apple's Vision Pro.
00:00:20 Quest excels in comfort and design.
00:00:30 Quest offers high-quality mixed reality pass-through.
00:01:18 Apple's headset has motion blur; Quest is crisper.
00:01:41 Quest's input options are versatile and accurate.
00:02:10 Quest's immersive content library is extensive.
00:02:41 Quest surpasses expectations despite price difference.
00:03:01 Meta aims to champion the open model in computing.
00:03:19 Collaboration and innovation shape the future of technology.
By YouSum Live
w
thanks
Bodied Apple 😂😂
the mixed reality passthrough is not that good its grainy i have a quest three bro is capping also hes not human so yea
Oculus is better than the Apple Vision Pro any given day!!
Apple 🍌
Peanies
imagine being so jelaus cuse he lost 50 billion dollar ...
neural interface so he can control your brain and feed it with more ads YIKES!
the mixed reality is grainy af hes lying also hes lying abt being human
So is the Apple vision pro
that's because of the light in your room and the capability of the cameras sensors on the device.. if they were to put mirrorless camera quality sensors on the device those would cost much more on their own from the actual device. So for now with the current technology quest 3 cameras are pretty decent for what they are used for. In 3-5 years we will probably get retina displays with mirror like visibility from cameras if the competition between vr companies continues like this. I remember using old vrs in a store and I bought quest 3 last week and the difference from 5 years before is unbelievable.