Who has the best claim to the title of Roman Emperor?
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 10. 2019
- Roman Emperors Family Tree chart:
usefulcharts.com/products/rom...
Thanks to all the channels that participated:
Stefan Milo:
/ @stefanmilo
Al Muqaddimah:
/ @almuqaddimahyt
M. Laser History:
/ @mlaserhistory
Jack Rackham:
/ @jackrackam
A Long, Long Time Ago:
/ @alonglongtimeago
This is Barris:
/ @thisisbarris
History & Headlines:
/ @historyandheadlines
The Cynical Historian:
/ @cynicalhistorian
Fiveable:
/ @thinkfiveable
Tom Richey:
/ tomforamerica
House of History:
/ @hoh
Hikma History:
/ @hikmahistory
History's Who Yesterday's Nation:
/ @historyswhoyesterdays...
====================
Who Would Be Tsar of Russia?
• Video
Intro music: "Lord of the Land" by Kevin MacLeod and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0. Available from incompetech.com
Roman Emperors Family Tree chart:
usefulcharts.com/products/roman-emperors-family-tree
In the UK, Francois Graftieaux wants the DNA of the Queen because he claims that his father is a illegitimate child of Edward VIII. Can you do a video on that?
THE OTTOMANS DESTROYED BYZANTIUM, THEY HAVE NO CLAIM
King Felipe looks like the son of Tom Hanks and Mel Gibson. Does that count?
Donald Trump. MAGA 2020
so when you say Karl von Habsbrug the von is pronounced fon because V sunds like F i german
The historically correct answer is the guy with the largest army.
That would be King Felipe
so Donald Trump
@@jerrydickerson1111 Xi Jinping*
@@FabiWann Well technically, but the state of Russia has both the largest of the armies, and highest military power rating. In terms of nations. but in terms of monarchs, you are correct, King Felipe
@@Darren67299 does largest mean numbers or effectiveness? Because if it means the latter (and it does), Xi is a child compared to Trump.
One more proof King Felipe have the best claim: Spain can't get a century without Civil War, nothing more Roman Empire than this
True.
That sounds pretty spanish, and roman
A sad and beautiful truth at the same time.
He doesn't have the best claim. Ferd and Issy never payed Andrew for his Byzantine claims, thus they never actually bought them off from him.
But if Roman blood only runs in the veins of Italians
King Felipes lineage is so deep he essentially has a claim as ruler for almost the entirety of Europe regardless of his Roman claim
Es verdad, incluso podría reclamar la corona inglesa por haber sido Felipe 2 rey de Inglaterra
What could be more Roman than having a claim on all of Europe
Are you sure about that claim?
The gypsy King!😊
that would not only make him the rightful roman emperor, but an emperor of something even greater of rome! the emperor of europe!
It's kinda crazy how the Spanish Crown has claims to some of the most historical kingdoms and empires ever like Holy Roman Empire through Austria, Kingdom of Naples and Sicily, Kingdom of Jerusalem, Ancient Rome and although not supported by legitimists you could even make a case for the former Kingdom of France. As a descendant of Spaniards sometimes I forget how powerful the Kingdom of Spain was during different points of history.
Lately i have being revising and confirming that in fact the Spanish Empire has been one of the most influential European Empires post Rome. Due to the time period it lasted, the geographical limits, the economical power that lasted even after its political and military power had diminished, and its cultural, and (believe it or not) scientific contributions. It had come to my attention based on recent though i had on the importance of the Spaniard currency during centuries, the role of Spain in global trade and culture. The fact that Spain had one of the most interesting approaches to human rights prior to the modern era is remarkable as well as the importance of spaniard universities up to the nineteenth century.
Absolutely 💯, but there is a thing called Black Legend of Spain, started when other countries couldn't win on the battlefield so they started a propaganda campaign, which revived every time that was necessary for those other countries' interests. ( I like your summary a lot, I think I'm gonna borrow it 😉)
@@henryytbthe Roman Empire and Spanish Empire are the two Greatests
@@fernandogarcia3957 Those people who believe and promote that have fallen asleep in all history classes.
@@nicolasrodriguezmartinez4613 There is a reason for the phrase: Spain, the third Rome.
What if the true Roman Emperor were the friends we made along the way?
Is that a one piece reference?
@@nameless5646 Not sure, but its a meme that the true successor to Rome is 'the friends we make along the way' or an obscure country or person.
Flynn Tom 😂
Caesar would kill them all
@@marcospedroza7184 Pirates?
Surely the answer is: whoever can pay the Praetorian Guard the most money.
What evil have I done?
Ave, Emperor Jeff Bezos!
@@kiharapata LOLOL who says that nero or caligula ? or was it another one....oh maybe it was the dick who bought the throne? after the prats auctioned it -.....didius julianus or someshit?
@@420judaspriest I think the Praetorian Guard killed the Emperor for being cheap and put the throne up for sale. Some Noble bought it for like 15 minutes. Some General said 'I don't think so' and marched in and took power. The Noble who thought he could buy power last words were "What evil have I done?" because he said he didn't kill anybody or did anything that bad. The General didn't feel he could let the guy live so the seemingly opportunistic Noble was executed. Don't remember the names of the principals but they were not that well recognized. Not "history famous" like the guys you mentioned.
Guilherme Pata being rich
It should totally be King Felipe VI, as he has Habsburg ancestry from his father's Spanish side, and Charlemagne's Frankish blood from the other side, as he is part of the House of Bourbon. Also, he is part of the Capetian dynasty, the oldest royal line in Europe. He also has a relation to the Greek throne through his mother's side, which used to be the heartlands of the Byzantines.
What Capetian dynasty please ?
@@twanabaiz9516 The house of Bourbon is a branch of the House of Capet that ruled France for almost all of its post-Frankish monarchical history. The house of Capet is also a branch of the Robertians, the line that Charlemagne belonged to. The main Capet branch ruled France until the late 1200s, the Valois branch of the Capetians ruled until 1589, and the the Bourbons ruled France until the French Revolution. After the war of Spanish Succesuon, the Spanish throne was also occupied by a Bourbon until today. Therefore, he can trace his heritage back through the Capets to Charlemagne.
The holy roman empire has nothing to do with Rome, neither do the Capetians, nor the Carolingians.
@@EvilSmonker Some people considered it the heir to Rome, even though it really isn;t, and, and Charlemagne was the first Holy Roman Emperor, and he was a Carolingian
@@avyay9818 I realize that some people think they are, but I believe there is little reason to think that besides a western european centric world view that discounts the eastern roman empire’s legitimacy.
King Felipe's claim is definitely the only legitimate one as far as I'm concerned, I mean first of all since he can trace his lineage so far back, he legitimately has the blood of Austrian and Russian royalty in his veins as well so he could easily claim the Habsurbg and Romanov claims for himself anyway. But more importantly, Romans generally did not care all that much about bloodline, they cared about the law which is why plenty of Roman emperors were not related in any way to the previous emperor and they cared about military might which is why some Roman generals could just straight up take the throne for themselves if the army followed them. Felipe has the legal will of the last Roman Emperor and he's the only one on the list with an army.
But all of that being said Napoleon definitely has the most entertaining claim.
Nobody expects the Spanish legitimacy.
Easily best comment here.
underrated
just because is Spain?
@@astrofabio68 It's a reference to some pretty awesome comedy.
🤣
Well, Romanov is a 97 year old artist, and his oldest son is an accountant in the SF bay area. The idea of the Emperor of Rome being an accountant in California just tickles the shit out of me.
MashPatayta I love this comment lol
Reminds me of Emperor Norton.
a descendant of the emperor of rome is an accountant, incredible lmao
Help Me isn’t it Biggus Dickus?
If he's an accountant in the economic shithole that is California i'm sure he's fit for the job, at least he knows a lot about inflation
What people seem to forget about is in Rome. The title of emperor or imperator was not given based on blood connection. But was actually given based on wealth, influence, and military power.
Of those introduced in the video, again the King of Spain is the one who could have had all those resources. Don't worry, it's only a an entertaining exercise, but it doesn't hurt anyone, I think, to acknowledge the fact that the rightful heir is His Majesty the King Felipe VI of Spain (and many other territories by tradition and officially...)
Also there hasn't been an Roman Empire for over 1500 years. People over here arguing about an artificial linage to a non-existent empire like it matters.
@@andyaustin3323Correction: 500 years and good joke.
Yeah only during periods like the crisis of the third century
THANK YOU SIR
I also opt for the King of Spain. In fact Spain is the real and legal heir to the Roman Empire, it was something it had and still has. Even the Spanish empire was also known as the transcontinental Roman empire, and many of the Roman emperors like Marcus Aurelius or Trajan were either Hispanic or of Hispanic origin. In Ancient Rome, the most beloved land in the entire empire after the Italic peninsula was Hispania, it even had its own senate (SPQH)
When you also know that he has the title of King of Jerusalem too you will be amazed jajajajajaja KING OF JERUSALEM (crusaders)
Wasn't Charlemagne the successor of Rome. Tht makes france
@@wingedhussar1453 The king of Spain is a descendant of Charlemagne
@marie7622 I mean a random bloke in france now could be descend of Charlemagne
Trajan was from an Italian family from Umbria. Marcus Aurelius was born in Italy to an Italian family as well. Maybe Hadrian and definitely Theodosius are Spanish. But the other two are not.
**Sees the name Romanov on the screen**
Lenin in his grave: God damnit, we missed some
Historic Science, Dammit!
You mean in the mausoleum?
*Lenin is his display case :-)
how many lennins are still there?
@@LoneStar48
Not nearly enough.
By Roman tradition the Emperor is the one who has the largest army. Phillip VI is the only one who is commander in chief of an actual army of an actual country.
All he needs to do now is adopt Jean-Christophe Napoleon and the Western Roman Empire is back in business.
Chris Mullen Then just invade some contries (Portugal, Andorra Monaco and Belgium are easy) and would control like half of all that the western roman empire ever had
@@Seneka51 Jean-Christophe Napoléon will never be a child of Felipe nor will ever represent Spain nor will ever a puppet of anyone, let alone Felipe. He is French. He is a descendant of Napoléon. How dare you?
Bro learn to take comments that are somewhat offensive to you
Did you just called Felipe... Phillip?
12:43 love that you included the up-and-coming and truly charming, Stephan Milo!
I thoroughly enjoyed this. Thank you.
By blood: Russia
By conquest: Ottoman
By inheritance: Spain
And, which is the most important matter, the LEGAL right. Felipe is the legal heir, the one who could show official and historical treatrises, documents and testaments of his ancestors, being them righteous, properly crowned holy roman emperors by popes.
MrSludov Felipe is from the bourbon house not the Habsburg which can not really give him a claim. The Russians maybe by the house of Ivan but not romonavs the ottomans maybe because they married lines of Byzantine princesses and they also had Constantinople which was known as the “pure Rome” and the Habsburg yes because the owned Roman lands even that doesn’t really give them a claim. Napoleon no no no. So really it’s just the ottomans and Habsburg and maybe the Russians.
@@warman8230 Salah, the claim of Felipe would be suported in the fact that the the last Byzantine emperor LEGALY passed the title in his testament to Fernando and Isabel of Spain.
Conquest is all the Romans respected.
@@MrSludov philippe the sixth of Spain will go straight to hell due to bull bullfighting practice!!!
I actually have a member of the Habsburg family in my school.
Austria is strange, you'll meet the president in the subway and the grand grand son of the former Kaiser at school.
Marry her AND YOUR CHILDREN IS GOING TO BE THE ROMAN EMPEROR
@@elpibelol5005 not even close
Varangian Gaming if you kill the right people hell yeah
Ferdinand Zvonimir?
Well tecnically almost every european is descendant of some nobility, so you can genocide your way into most thrones.
Extremely interesting! Thank you!
Felipe VI of Spain.
He is perfectly heir to Fernando and Isabel, he is directly descended from them. The last Habsburg of Spain, Carlos II died without issue and left the throne of Spain, in his will, to his great-nephew Felipe de Borbon, descendant (grandson) of his sister Teresa of Habsburg, wife of the King of France, the future Felipe V. from Spain. The other claimant who claimed the throne once Philip had already been proclaimed and was King of Spain, was Carlos of Habsburg who was also a great-nephew of Charles II, grandson of another sister, but had not been named heir by the last Habsburg King of Spain.
I think there is only one way to decide this - the Roman way: The claimants have to fight it out in a civil war.
I am pretty sure that felipe wild have quite the high ground over his rivals😅
You wanna put the spanish one in a civil war dispute? Are you sure that would be fair with the other contenders?
*world war.
The Habsburgs would win simply by marrying everyone and putting their kids in the will.
@@GlobalWarmingSkeptic Which kid? Now that's the question!
I think it would be whoever gets the largest army to Rome
Only one is capable of raising one 🤷♂️
@@SacchieILU Turkey France or Russia could all do that.
@@HVLLOWS1999 Turkey, France, and Russia are not led by the Osmans, Bonapartists, or Romanovs.
@@SacchieILU Spain aint go no big army anymore, Italy's army is stronger.
@@SacchieILU Yeah? Which one? The monarchy in Spain is really weak, so Felipe certainly can't...
What a banger - I will request this at the club tonight
This was a GREAT video!
This is the kind of argument that can only be resolved with violence.
Magnificent
Everyone hire a gladiator
Who can be the conqueror
It has been resolved. We plebes would never know. It doesn't concern us.
Paul Maupin spoken like a true roman emperor
I'm usually pro blood, but how can one argue that bloodline matters when Rome's previous emperors weren't even related? I vote for law and order, and so I go with the Spanish claim.
but rome's in italy though, not spain. the italian guy should get it (rome is in italy)
@@ausore9832 that’s not how it works
@@user-hl6ls8sv4t yeah it is
@@ausore9832 no
@@user-hl6ls8sv4t ye
Interesting how three of those lines were cut by the WW1. Trully shows you how much the map of the world changed by this conflict.
I had worked to be done but CZcams recommend this video so in that sense I have to/ need to watch this.
I mean to be fair, the Romans themselves would probably argue who would be Emperor and each man would eventually build his own faction of sorts.
10th Roman Civil War? Confirm?
They would argue who would be emperor and then form their own factions before the pretorian guard kills everybody and choses a third candidate nobody thought about.
@@fristnamelastname5549 10th? More like the 150th
@Jan Sitkowski well the only remnants of the senate would be the Italian legislature, so i guess the ball is in their court now.
@Jan Sitkowski well it certainly resembles an empire in collapse anyway
Don’t forget that King Felipe’s mom is princess Sofia of Greece (to many the descendants of the byzantines) and Denmark. She is a direct descendant of queen Victoria and also Russian royalty. Spain has by far the most direct line.
Through Russian royalty he’ll also have Constantine XI as an ancestor
-A Spanish
@@Annnto that’s not a fact it’s an opinion because there can be no way to objectively claim a legitimate emperor, I was mostly pointing out the obvious bias of a Spanish person proclaiming it. I’m pretty sure if you dive into genealogy as much there will be people with similar characteristics but they video didn’t. And by the way half of my family is originally from Spain just a couple generations back, so I have no reason to envy Spain. Think harder, thought is not a linear process it’s more like a web stop being so linear
@@MacetazzOpina still a fact? Dude she is still alive if i’m not wrong, and the op is talking about probability
Plus, the Spanish Royal Family also has roots from the Habsburg Dynasty and has had many marriages with Austrians later on. They're also from the Bourbon dynasty from France
It was crazily interesting and I had a lot of fun hearing all the arguments for every candidate. Personally I go with you, even though spanish royalty didn't claim it, it's true that the romans valued the legal standpoint, so the Spanish King, Felipe IV is a big candidate. Thank you for this video 🥰
It seems like we’ve decided on the Spanish claim. Now on to the important stuff, like how do we bring forward the Neo-Roman Empire?
If Spain somehow manages to overshadow France and Germany in the EU, I think that would be a neo-roman empire
True, we all agree on Felipe VI, but... how do we bring back the Roman Empire? Do we proceed to arrange a referendum in Rome? Come on folks, bring up some ideas! Looking forward to the Neo-Roman Empire.
@@user-yi3cv3ep5j yes I’ve come to the conclusion that the only legitimate successor has to come through the Holy Roman Catholic Church
We already has the European Union, while there is no office title "Leader of European Union" but there is several President position Spanish King can eligible to be in. So ironically it will be the Holy Roman Empire style of government again, but this time with the proper Roman Emperor as the head of state
just get the pope to crown him or something
Not only does King Felipe of Spain has the best claim, he totally nails the Roman Emperor look
Right! The Romans loved law. Felipe would make the best statue and I think he has the best army in Europe. Plus he speaks a Latin language.
@@oldtimetinfoilhatwearer Don't forget that Roman's could and did select heirs not of their blood. If this was ancient Rome, I could walk out on the street grab a kid, and with the proper paperwork, declare them my heir. So Felipe wins in blood, documents, and Roman style.
Gabe Morehouse best army in europe ? Someone doesn’t know about France, UK, Turkey, Germany and Italy. These are the countries with a better military than Spain currently.
+chris. Felipe does not have the best claim of Roman Emperor. And, he does not secure The Roman Emperor look. He does not even look like a Roman Emperor for you to claim this.
@@oldtimetinfoilhatwearer Wrong! The Romans loved law that they created themselves. Felipe would not make the best statue. He does not have a good army in Europe nor The World nor existence. Plus, Jean-Christophe Napoléon speaks a Latin Language, too. The Latin Language spoken by Jean-Christophe Napoléon is named, French.
Let's decide this the Roman way: civil war.
UUH I LOVE THIS PART!
Becomes Emperors*
>Get shanked by the praetorioan guard and their commander replaces you
its the 21st century, either 1v1 in a game, a rap battle or a dance battle
japanese shord fights are also acceptable
i would pay to see any of those
Don't forget flat out assassination.
Lol China probably had 20x more civil wars I think at one point they had a civil war every time an emperor died
Great discussion! Obviously a lot of different strong and legitimate opinions! I like the “rocking the beard” argument and the “good vs bad Roman” 👍🤣
King felipe vi has a claim through his habsburg ancestors as well the spanish habsburg line was the more senior and he is a descendent of that line so he has a claim from the byzantine empire and charlemange so has the best claim
King Felipe VI hands down.
Rome literally had a period where they put randoms as Emperors so that pretty much makes heirs and bloodlines unimportant and unnecessary. The legal document (his will) should be the only things that matters
Felipe VI has already the title of Byzantine emperor and king of Jerusalem too.
@Jason Sehorn nope
King Felipe VI makes a good contender because many Roman Emperors "chose" their heirs, sometimes those heirs were not only adopted, but not even related to them by blood. Thus, the legal argument goes onto him.
Not only that, but also by blood on both sides due to their relation to Bourbon, Habsburgs, charlemagne and even the Rurikids
Sure your words are true but not when you are getting conquered.
That's why I'm going with the Ottomans candidate
@@napolien1310 I agree. I was simply pointing out that the Legal course of it does infact go with the Spanish. But the last Qaiser-e-Rum were the Ottomans. Therefore I also support them.
@@khudaidadkhan1178 oh ok
@@napolien1310 But... Ottoman empire is also broke apart
@Fiveable - why do you say Irene’s line but then choose Dundar Ali Osman? Wouldn’t “Irene’s line” go to the Russian Romanovs? It is confusing what Fiveable says…? @ 20:53
can i introduce one last contender, one whose claim would predate the claims of any of the five listed in the video? i havent got a name for them, but the most senior heir of Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, the King of Rome until 509 BC when the republic was founded?
Let's be real. King Felipe is the only one that looks good with a traditional roman toga
Hahaha
He looks exactly like a Roman sculpture
Jean-Christophe looks æons more classically ‘Roman’ than the eh’Spaneesh guy. No competition.
@@Floral_Green He Kinda resembles Constantine
@Timothy Callanan Naww
Jean-Christophe Napoléon married a Habsburg today, he really wants that Roman Emperor title lol.
Did he? Haha
Yes, it is true, the countess Olympia von und zu Arco-Zinneberg, daughter of archduchess Maria-Beatrix von Habsburg and great-granddaughter of Karl I Habsburg, last emperor of Austria-Hungary
Jorge Vargas Caporali 😵😵😵
@@willmosse3684 Yes, he did so at the Invalides, where Napoléon is burried aha
The Brazilian Imperial House has Habsburg blood from D. Leopoldina, what means that IF every claimer of the Roman Emperor Title die then the claimer of the Brazilian Throne would be also the claimer of the Roman Throne
Btw it will never happen
Good, I'm glad you had the good sense to look at it from the legal Roman view. I 100% agree
0:37 Lumber tycoon 2 caught me off guard
Definitely King Felipe of Spain has the best claim. Can't beat a legal document that says: 'I'm leaving the Empire to you, have fun and best wishes'.
He also is a bourbon of the legitamist line, giving him another claim though as the French crown is derived from East Francia, itself splintered from Charlemagne's empire, as well as also being given the titles from Andreas Palailogos, fusing the titles of Roman Emperor to Phillipe VI, or Augustus Philippus Iohannes Paullus Alphonsus, or Felipe III and VIII in English.
His name is not on that paper
Obviously. We're talking about his lineage, not him as an individual.
@@marcmoris3590 But those titles are on the papers that left him as King of Spain, which also (surprise) also contains titles his lineage has, who knew that when you inherit something you can also give it to someone else to inherit?
no joke I seen him just a few days ago in Cordoba while I was drinking no idea what was hapenning until someone said that is the king of spain. Amazing how they rocked up like that with very little organisation. Guess it means I seen my first Roman emperor lol.
When you're so early that Romolus Augustus is still emperor
When you're so early that he is called Gaius Octavianus
..the last true emperor of Rome...Romulus..
When Romulus Augustus was deposed and retired, his insignia was sent to the Eastern Empire so technically the Empire was reunited. The Goths ruled Italy in the Eastern Empire's name, if not so much in actuality....
@@fluffytom82 I read Augustus and my mind jumped the gap 🤦♂️
@@fluffytom82 He's confusing the last Augustus for the first
Another interesting fact, the brother of the last byzantine emperor technically inherited his brothers title, and when he died he left his title to the "Monarch of Spain"
I also vote for the handsome king Felipe
If Crusader Kings II has taught me anything, neither of them has pressed their claims appropriately by war, hence none of them have inherited anything. Now, somebody will have to hold 80% of the de jure territory, have two kingdom-level titles, be really pious and pay 600 bucks to somebody not specified in order to create the title. Then again, since the Roman Empire is now merely a titular empire with no de jure demesne, he would have to make use of the corresponding decision to found it, which requires massive prestige and tons of duchies to be controlled. I'd be curious if they'd choose to mend the schism or restore hellenism, though.
If I am right, turkish culture changes the name of country so Ottoman Empire could have been in fact Byzantine Empire, but claim of any title lasts only to grandchildren of current ruler, so the head of Ottoman dynasty have no claim to it. We can only wait for another crusade which could restore the Latin Empire.
Well, King Felipe has 26 kingdom level titles, holds 8 duchies and 1 arcduchy and probably has tons of prestige (although his marriage to a commoner would have cost him a buttload of prestige), so he is the best candidate!
that game. . .is amazing lmao omg, I once caught myself saying " crap I'm my wife now " lmao that games makes you say the craziest shit " how do I kill my son, I need him dead " XD good times. . . good times
@@jakubbezimienia6449 The turks conqured byzantine so no not fit for rome emperor title if were enemies of it
glitterhoof is the best candidate
Friend: "Want to go to a bar tonight?"
Me: "Sorry, busy"
*binge watches videos on claims to former empires*
How cool, you have no social life and neglect your friends because you'd rather watch videos alone
@@dominikweber4305 you’re watching the video so you obviously think it’s interesting💀
@@nickweimer2118 yes but they're commenting on the weird attempt at a brag that just comes across as arrogant and sad, not the act of watching the video.
Thats literally what i did just now lmfao
@N Gaming Romulus wasn’t chosen by the senate?
Thanks, very fun😂
Watch on 1.5x speed to listen to a normal person talking.
I think the Spanish claim is the most legit: blood was not that important for Romans as the emperor often adopted their chosen next emperor
wrong, pride and blood are two most important things for romans, from all heirs spain is the one that deserves the least, if anyone should be emperor of rome although it is impossible because once something is dead you can revive it ever, it would be Italy or Great Britain.
@@paranoidman15 actually as I said adoption was a method largely used to choose your own heir in Rome, so blood wasn’t that important. If you look at the golden age of the empire, most of the emperors weren’t their predecessors sons.
@@giulia480 that's true, but the heirs are still chosen based on spiritual bond which is close to blood, and Spanish King was chosen to heir to Rome because of desperate attempt to gain their attention so that they would fight the Ottomans.
@@paranoidman15 Great britain more than spain? haha
Seriously? Spain inherited more from Rome than it is, and as far as I know there was never a Breton emperor, nor is a Latin language spoken there, I'm sure you are English x "d
even france would be a better candidate lol
I was rooting for Spain the entire time and was getting a little disappointed when no one was showing Spain love, glad you were big brain there.
Same fam... same.
... and he would look best in the crown and robes.
Same here.
I know right !!!
Roman Emperors chose their successors so imo Spain makes most sense.
THANK YOU, I was sitting here shivering as people went against the law, advocating for unlawful emperors, I was thinking all this time, when will they support Phillipe, someone must support Phillipe, have they forgotten Phillipe. THANK YOU for recognizing Philippe's claim on the roman empire even if it has no bearing on real life
In 476 Odoacer deposed emperor Augustulus and re-recognized the previous emperor, Julios Nepos (474-475), as emperor of the W.R.E., the E.R.E. also recognized Nepos as emperor again.
Odoacer then ruled under emperor Nepos as "King of Italy" until Nepos death in 480.
Odoacer sent to Zeno, emperor of the east, the title of Emperor of the West as well.
Thus the Byzantine road is the correct one.
The king of Spain being proclaimed emperor looks the more promising one since it was officially proclaimed so by the man who inherted both the WRE and ERE titles from Zeno.
I'm honestly shocked that none of those CZcamsrs brought up the Spanish Claim. I was ready to start yelling at my computer screen until you finally came in and spit some facts.
x2
Exactly
Hum CONQUERED BY NAPOLEON hum
Jack Rackham at least acknowledged the Spanish claim and said there's a pretty good argument for it, but dismissed it on the grounds that they never really pressed the claim.
i'd say it was the hapsburgs or maybe napoleon over the spanish claim but imo the spanish claim to the byzantine throne is the most legit one. i think that the byzantine empire was a bit too different from the roman empire to call it the roman empire. i also like the fact that the holy roman empire and spain are the two places that are actually roman catholcis
The King of Spain
1) Has legal claim
2) Already a head of state
3) Member of Capetian family, oldest still royal line in Europe
4) Theodoric was given western imperial regalia from Eastern Emperor and Spain is the successor state of the Visigothic Kingdom meaning both titles east and west can be claimed by the Spanish crown
5) A Latin speaker
You forgot that what makes him more legitimate is that monarchs inherited it without force just given by the Nephew of the Emperor somehow inherited his uncle's title
Don't forget the beard. 😜
Romans never had Kings, Capet are French - French are regarded as completely foreign people in Europe whom Justinian wanted to exterminate
@@WizavPRO As if you never heard the Roman kingdom
@@WizavPROSpanish you mean he dint said the french
I was about to comment a bunch of lines in favor of the greatest ignored despite the legal claims, Spain. Until I got to the end of the video, to be surprised. The answer is very clear and unquestionable: Felipe VI has a beard. Point.
WOW!! This was a fantastic and fascinating video! I can't believe I disagreed with every historian....until the very end. Everytime they made a point I kept saying "What! What about Roman law?" So, yeah, it would totally be the King of Spain!
And also is the King of Jerusalem 😂
If we are going with the Spanish Claim it’s also important to remember that Spanish Kings also descended from Karl V of Austria/HRE , linking the two empires together in Felipe’s Claim
I think "Roman Empire" is something we couldn't really go with, I think you would have to differentiate between western and eastern roman Empire.
The HRE existed besides the Byzantine (eastern roman empire) so if we accept their claim to the roman empire title it would only be that of west Rome
Following the arguments for the Spanish those would be the Eastern Roman Empire
So I think we would have a eastern roman empire in Spain and a western roman empire in Austria for maximum confusion.
Whatever I say will turn into heated debate full of anger and hate - but truth is, Spaniards are Visigoths who settled from North to South - Favila, Pelayo, Mauregato are Visigoths and modern Spaniards are completely unrelated to Roman world just like French or Italians (who are also French). Keep in mind that any relation to Germanic peoples and race makes you automatically disqualified
@@WizavPRO nonsense. Many of the late western roman emperors had germanic or otherwise "non-roman" descent. Even earlier in fact, Aurelian (restitutor orbis) for example wasn't even born in roman territory.
Carlos 5 was also spanish king
Nope, if the last byzantine emperor had a will to pass the throne to Isabella and Ferdinand of Aragon. their grandson Charles 5 Hapsburg's line is the better one. so, it should pass to Karl Hapsburg. because it was the French who set up a king in Spain after wars of Spanish succession. and he is of the bourbon dynasty. The current king of Spain is also of the bourbon clan. and coming to Russia the blood line of Byzantines has already faded away. As many times the throne was passed to others other than the dynastic rulers hereditary line. it is not a good idea. Through the imperial families it should be a Hapsburg.
I feel the Spanish have a pretty good claim. It often happened throughout Roman history that the heir was adopted or chosen. And since the Spanish monarchy are the only ones to survive to today, I feel they have spirit of the Romans.
Also they are descended from Charlemagne, albeit through a female line, so they have a claim even if you think the HRE was the successor to Rome, because the mother of the first count of hapsburg was a direct descendant of Charlamagne and a hapsburg married into the Bourbon family, which still rules Spain.
They've also still got decently roman looking architecture.
Yeah no thanks they tried with France and they failed miserably go for Bonaparte
@@crframe738 most Europeans are descended from Charlemagne
Also one of the best Roman Emperors, Trajan, was born in a city called Italica close to modern day Seville, so it wouldn't be that strange to have a spanish roman emperor
That one explanation of the Habsburgs, convinced me that those make the most sense to be the Roman Emperor since they reunited East and West ontop of being crowned multiple times by the Pope
Turkish guy: *picks Ottoman claimant*
French guy: *picks Bonaparte claimant*
Really the first guy was onto something when he proposed Imperator Dwayne, of the House Rock
Think of it....Dwane The Scorpion Emperor!
Added bonus: if the Rock becomes the Roman Emperor, we get Wrestlemania at the Colosseum
Would that mean that any school sponsored by the Imperator would be... a School of Rock?
@@skoshman1 Yes. In fact he would employ Jack Black as whatever the Roman equivalent of Education Secretary was
Go forth Dwayne, son of John, Head of your house of Rock, and claim your throne.
King Felipe VI of Spain actually has two claims to be Emperor of Rome. The first one is the line discussed in the video and the second is so obvious I am amazed the guy rocking an awesome beard did not mentioned it. Felipe VI's last name is Borbon. A noble house directly related to the French House of Bourbon. Prince Philippe, Duke Of Anjou in 1700 became Rey Felipe V de España. Since the Bourbons were the last Kings of France before the revolution that makes Felipe of Spain in line to be Roman emperor through the Charlemagne line.
That was my two cents.
You missed the fact that before the spanish throne was habsburg. And there were several wars between bourbone and habsurgs. War of succession in 1700 and the carlist wars during the 19th century.
So the spanish have claims to both sides following the logic that they have habsburg heritage and legal claim through heritage in the will of the last eastern emperor.
Also via the Bourbon’s parent family the Capets the Bourbons can trace their lineage to the Rurikids who did marry at least one member of a Byzantine ruling family and via the Habsburgs they can also trace their lineage to another Byzantine royal family. So technically the Bourbons and the Habsburgs have strong claims to the Roman throne. However the Russians can also trace their lineage to the Rurikids, like I mentioned above, who had married at least one Byzantine princess meaning that if a blood connection was required these three houses would have possibly the strongest claims to the defunct Roman throne. But a fair number of Roman emperors weren’t necessarily related to one another so if we base it on merit then the Bonapartes would be strong claimants to the throne.
@@herrlizuain70 The bourbons reigning in spain already had claims for the Habsburg titles of the spanish crown. I know it's confusing as hell but if I rememeber correctly Felipe V was related to the spanish crown by his grandma. So technically both claims could be valid.
But the Ottomans are no more.
House of Bourbon has no lineage to Charlemagne and the Carolingian dynasty. The French branch died out with Charles, Duke of Lower Lorraine.
Who intermarried with Carolingians were the saxon Liudolfings, with Otto I. being crowned first Holy Roman Emperor. After the death of the Lidudolfings came the Salian dynasty which had actual frankish origins like Charlemagne. The last dukes of Franconia were also vying for control of the HRE crown.
It could also be argued that you or I have just as much of a claim to the title of Roman Emperor, since the successful transfer of power, from a Roman Emperor to a chosen heir, was very few and far between.
19:38 Man what the hell is that tie?? That's so cool! You can read his tie if he bores you with what he is talking about lmao.
What people are forgetting is that a Roman emperor could name their heir and it didn't have to be a genetic descendent... This goes to the Spanish King.
Edit: we agree nvm lol
@John Smith i know you are joking, but dont put Caesar in the same sentence as this soy boy called trump.
@John Smith Trump only commands the puny colonial legions, he doesn't count.
A.J. Bensinger I don’t think the Romans would like a Non Roman to lead them. Just saying.
@John Smith the consuls controlled the legions.
@@Mardek775 happened all the time...
Out of all these guys, Dwayne from the House of Rock makes the most sense
@Emperor Louis The Retard no he is samoan
@Emperor Louis The Retard He has the best claim to Samoas Cocoa and Coconut exports limited. He'll have the biggest fale in Samoa.
Emperor Dwayne the Rock of Johnson
“It doesn’t matter who the emperor is!”
or Tom Hanks!
Let’s get all five of them in one room to fight to the death. Only one can truly be the heir to the glory of Rome!
I think personally it heavily depends on the context of why someone is being named emperor and when
for example if we are declaring someone emperor now to lead rome, I would choose the spanish line because they are actual monarchs and have the skills to lead.
if we are just declaring someone the title for titles sake I would give it to napoleon or the russians,
but personaly I would choose somone based on ethier the republican or imperical ideoligies
if we are talking empire, then napoleon as he defeated italy and had a large portion of the empires terrirtory under his control and has many of the symbols of power
if we are talking the republicans, then philip of spain as the romans of the republic took the law more seriously
overall all of these ideoligies can be used to theroireticaly argue for any of the 5 to be emperor
Roman emperor: hey spanish dude, you are now the heir to the roman empire
Spanish dude: cool
Historians: this means nothing
I wanted to like, but you were at 69 likes.
Sorry little one
John Levin not anymore you can like now
Historians: "this means nothing"
Spanish dude's father: "Why won't you shut up?" =]
King Juan Carlos was the Holy Roman Emperor. Who has succeeded him?
Juan Carlos is the sperm donor of Prince William.
He's not the roman emperor, he's a very naughty boy!
Spain also makes sense because they went and did the Roman thing. Conquer the New World!
yes, the Spanish basically brought the roman law to America, and did what Rome did, they brought and funded institutions based on Rome to the new world.
Spain also followed in with many other traditions:
* Exploited the valuable minerals from their conquered lands, just like the Romans did to Spain
* Built an extravagant multicultural empire, THE superpower of their respective era, with a very self-serving mindset
* Had a long decline until a rising great power dealt the final blow (for Spain: Spanish-American War)
* Theocratic rule (Christian Rome, Christian Spain)
* Spain built up on the old Roman saying NON PLVS VLTRA (nothing beyond [the Pillars of Hercules/ Strait of Gibraltar]) and really had quite the extravagant PLVS VLTRA (their New World conquests)
@@LucarioBoricua El imperio Español fue el último imperio clásico, digno heredero del Romano en lo colonial como en lo militar y a mi parecer hicieron mas bien que mal en América. Dudo mucho que la palabra "Boricua" hubiese llegado hasta nuestros días bajo otros imperios coloniales de la época
@@OverthinkerYT PLUS ULTRA el sol no se ponia en el imperio español
@@LucarioBoricua
Stay mad
I think that the ottomans, since they were given the imperial symbols of Rome (just like when the western romans sent them to the eastern romans) hold the best claim, also considering that they held the lands of the eastern romans
Are the brits the heirs of the native « empire » or grand chief just because they conquered it ?
They are the only actual direct successor state from Rome in here
@@jpb2366 Not even one territory conquered by the brits gave them the symbols of their people and culture
I agree that the Spanish King has the best claim. However, the 2nd best claim would be the Frenchman. Because the original Napoleon Bonaparte conquered Egypt and for a time provided stability to the region. Sure the Russians also ventured to Egypt but they mainly just looted it without maintaining stability.
Neither the Ottomans or Habsburgs did the same thing, but Egypt was part of the Greek Empire and established the Ptolemaic Line of Pharaohs. Then when Rome conquered the Greek Empire and Egypt they established themselves there until their empire fell. So since the French Empire was the only one to ever successfully claim that region of the Former Roman Empire that gives them a little bit more of a claim then any others on this list.
Technically speaking, the title has to go to Spain. Russia is no longer ruled by the Romanovs, nor is Turkey ruled by the Osmans or Germany by the Martels. But Spain is ruled by the same ancestry that inherited the Byzantine title.
Technically, if I'm reading well, that was the Hasburg dinasty the ones that inheritage the Holy Roman Empire, but they died by f*cking with cousins so now Spain have a French dinasty called Burbon
@Frx bx01 you didn't watch the video then. @usefulcharts already said there was a direct line from Philipe VI to the original transfer of the imperial title.
This means the king of spain inherits that title despite being a bourbon not a trastamara.
@Frx bx01 you do not understand what you are saying and I feel sorry for you.
@Frx bx01 It seems someone skipped the 2:25 mark here...
Technically it’s be Trump since the only country on earth closest to the absolute domination culturally, economically and militarily as Rome was in the ancient era is the United States in the modern era, therefore the most powerful person in Rome would be akin to the most powerful person in the USA...Trump so all Hail Trump Emperor of the USA
Let's be real the only one there that looks like an actual emperor is the King of Spain. He be lookin' like 2020s Trajan
Maybe because trajan was from Spain
@@danielrojas-db9nq and Hadrian too.
i look almost exactly like Caracalla
Rather Hadrian or Marcus Aurelius. Trajan didn't wear beard. Ask to Mary Beard.
Did actual emperors look like actual emperors, though?
I will go for the " will", the Spaniards King & Queen and the heir is King Felipe VI of Spain.
In previous times, it is usually the will of the King that decides who is next in line.
Same with land inheritance. Who inherits the land? If you are the King or Emperor, you need the land under your name.
sometimes. but its also the conquerors who decide. ottomans conquered Eastern Rome and even made their capital into the new capital, renamed istanbul.
no one cares if you claim you're the next in line if you can't do anything with that and are nothing more than a rival claimant.
Given the Emperor often just took power by force, it's odd to talk about legitimate lines of descent
The King of Spain Is not only heir of The Catholic Kings but he is also descendant of the Royal Family of Greece and also descendant of Charlemagne an of the French Monarchy, Felipe VI is the one with more claims to the Empire
Philip Arvanitidis the Hapsburgs, Osmans, Napoleons, and Romanovs have nothing to do with Rome either? They all just took on the name because of its great history. If anything being a descendant of Charlemagne has by far the best claim as he and his successors were crowned by the still very Roman Pope when the Catholic Church was still the official religion of the actual intact Roman Empire. All the others claims were either manufactured later or rely on the title of Holy Roman Empire. The only better claim would be a direct heir of the Byzantines or old Roman Empire.
@Philip Arvanitidis That quote which is so often spoken by the masses was created by Voltaire, an opponent to monarchy in general. He looked at the Holy Roman Empire of his time, and saw that it was, at his time, neither Holy, Roman, nor an empire. What he neglected to inform the masses of, was that in it's creation, it held the city of Rome, it had inflated borders, ruling what many would consider areas which would certainly constitute it being known as an empire, and its original leader was crowned by the pope himself, quite holy if I do say so myself.
Yes the late "Holy Roman Empire" was neither Holy, Roman nor an Empire. But the original entity Ruled by Charlemagne, which later became what we know as the "Holy Roman Empire" was in fact in possession of Rome, of Empirical statute, and granted its titles by the greatest Holy authority on earth at the time (if we're roman catholic). Which I would consider to makes it Holy, Roman and an Empire. If king Felipe VI of Spain has a direct succession from a legal standpoint, and is descended from BOTH Charlemagne and the Byzantine Emperors, how could you possibly try to argue that any line has any more of a claim to the title of Roman emperor than he does?
@Philip Arvanitidis--the Holy Roman Empire was neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire.
He's also descended from Hugh Capet, Louis XIV,Charles V,Queen Victoria,even William the Conqueror,
@Philip Arvanitidis yes u are right.
fun fact though : there was a Roman (Gallo-Roman) senator named Tonantius Ferreolus who is a patrilineal ancestor of Charlemagne.
Therefore Felipe is descended from him as well,not an Emperor but a Roman indeed.
Hes probably linked to a Roman emperor somehow probably but is highly likely we will never know
Thousands of years later and rome is still relevant. Even just the title has some meaning
You don't have to look at who should hold the title to find ways Rome is still relevant. From the language we speak to the religion that whether we like it or not shaped much of our culture, the legacy of Rome is baked into a lot of our lives.
@@86soup 2 is plural
@@86soup Yes Rome has has existed for thousands of years....
600 years* considering the Eastern Empire
Simeon II of Bulgaria is the last person to hold the title caesar. The bulgarian tsardom was abolished in 1946, making him the last monarch to hold a title derived from "Caesar".
I came back to this for about the third time because of a really pedantic argument with a friend, but I'd like to point out that a Spaniard is as Roman as Emperor Trajan, so we have that going for us as well.
I agree with Spain. Besides that Felipe is the only one looking like an Emporer.
His first cousin Pavlos of Greece; looks very kingly to me as well.
The argument that when ottomans conquered, Thomas went into exile and took the empire within him has merit
I'm not gay but I'd totally blow Jean Christophe
@@vmaldia good claim, however weaker than the ones here.
ALSO APART FROM THE UK SPAIN HAD THE BIGGER EMPIRE EVER.
oh man, I went through this whole video thinking "I think it should be the spanish, legally, but NO ONE seems to agree with me" but THEN! vindication!
My exact feeling throughout the video.
Agreed. If Julius can name Augustus his adopted son and heir in his will and Augustus adopt his heir Tiberius, then Spain has all the legitimacy it needs. Blood doesn't matter; the will of the emperor matters.
I was feeling the same! LMAO
me 4
Pretty sure Charles III of England has the best claim, he is the direct heir of Charlemagne as you pointed out in one of your other videos.
16:54 that's not about William 2, the title of Tsar(King) of Poland was added to Russia's Emperor (Empress at that time). Which is one of the reasons Napoleon never tried to mess around Poland's independence and titles
Ok the fact that Felipe actually is a current ruling Monarch makes all other "claims" obsolete. All hail to our caesar!
Caesar Philippi
Is he even worthy though for real?
I mean... not really.
Viva el Rey de España !!
VIVA FELIPE!
I'm sure someone mentions it somewhere, but just in case since it wasn't explicit in the video:
King Felipe of Spain is also technically distantly related to the Hapsburgs. In the 1500s the King of Spain Charles V was not just also the Holy Roman Emperor but the Head of the Hapsburg House as well. But at this time the Hapsburgs split into the Spanish Hapsburgs (with Charles V's son Phillip II being in charge as well as King of Spain) and the Austrian Hapsburgs (Charles V's brother became head as well as Holy Roman Emperor, which is where the Hapsburg line in this video comes in).
But Charles V's great great grandson Charles II (Ik ik ignore the number weirdness) died with no children, so the Kingdom of Spain passed on to the grandson of Charles II's sister. And it's at this point the Spanish Hapsburgs are considered no more. But that's just due to male inheritence rules, Charles II's sister was as much of a Hapsburg as he was, and it's only because she wasn't male that her offspring weren't considered Hapsburgs. Anyways if you follow this line down a bunch of generations you get right back to King Felipe.
(I think so anyways, i kinda just worked through it on wikipedia, that's why this chart format works so well! Much clearer!)
But point being Karl von Hapsburg and King Felipe are like, geneologically just as much Hapsburgs as the other, although perhaps Karl's line has been subject to a few more inmarriages. But like assuming i didnt miss anything, Charles V's father should be a common ancestor for them. It's just that King Felipe's ancestors didn't get the name itself passed down. (And there might be a marriage or two that gives him a few more links to the Hapsburgs)
So as many commenters have pointed out, being Roman Emperor has never really been about familial inheritence (and Holy Roman Emperor and Roman Emperor aren't exactly the same), but if you wanted to know who gets the most 'points' for being valid as a choice, King Felipe of Spain has a legal validation for being the Eastern Emperor, a familial tie to being the Western Emperor, and is the only actual Royal Head of State of all of these people.
you dont have to go that far. Philip's great-grandfather's Mother (Maria therese of Austria, mother of Alfonso XIII ) Was an habsburg too. But its not simple a matter of finding links among each other. Every european royal house in europe is really quite connected)
The Ottoman Emperors did marry Byzantine princesses.
I would also add that Isabel of Castile and Fernando of Aragon are also his ancestors. So he's part of the Trastámara dinasty as well (that's a Spanish/Castilian dinasty). This doesn't have much to do with the Roman Empire, but just wanted to add it because some people don't know this.
Ariana M So technically,if Felipe were to drop dead,karl would be the legitimate heir to his throne?
@@hisstatus No bc Felipe has two daughters that would inherit everything (I think Spanish laws allow for female succession but I'm not sure). Unless I'm misunderstanding your point
Russia wasn't even close to touching Core Roman Lands but has a ethnic connection through the Romanovs who married the last East Roman monarch. But the Romanov's aren't in power..
France has Napoleon who just claimed it after stealing the Crown.. And the Bonaparte family isn't ruling France.
Austria has the Habsburgs who are people with the Title of the HRE crowned by the Pope and held Rome the city when the Title were given. But Rome by then wasn't really seen as the Roman Empire as the Eastern Empire in Constantinople (Still Existing) was basically the legit descendance everyone saw as Rome, and Rome Rome just being a relic. Also yeah uh that Title died in 1912 so..
Spain's got it's titles directly from the last Roman Emperor (Byzantine). But they bought it so.. but again they're related to the Habsburgs adding the old title of the HRE to the legitimisy and is actually a Royal Family ruling in a country unlike every other contender. A special note is that they now have the (Dead) Habsburg Titles, Official Eastern Roman Titles (Bought), and are in charge of an actual state.
Turkey.. Ottomans also just claiming to be the new Roman Empire after taking Constantinople in 1453 while the actual title was already officially owned by the Habsburgs (If you wanted to look at it as if the Habsburg HRE Title were Official from the crowning in 800). On top of the Habsburgs, Russia was now ethnically tied to the last Eastern Roman bloodline, giving it the appearance of the Eastern Roman Empire (Large Eastern Orthodox country being a major power and holding blood connections to the fallen Byzantium) not really fading but shifting into a new Orthodox Russia. So just like Napoleon not only was it just claimed and the Ottoman family isn't in control of any country today, but claiming the Title while 2 other valid-ish claims existing was strange to begin with. (That's forgetting the fact that Constantinople was seen as the true Eastern Roman Empire Capital and centre of Roman/Greek Culture for the past 1000 years and the Ottomans took it and made it their Capital for 500 years transforming the Culture and people entirely..).
So ah yes.. Ottoman's don't exist anymore but I'd say them and the Spanish claim are the closest. Changed my mind a bit there with the Ottomans.. But yes I'd say those two are the best to the Claim.
I agree with your opinion following your arguments as well as the fact that each emperor git less roman. So the next emperor should have been approved by the former or by the former prefered king
Amazing how impartial these historians are, picking their own countries
EXACLTY my thought
LOL, it's just a thought exercise!
*All statements from historians should be taken with a grain of salt*
Very true, upsets me to see it but I think worldview plays a bigger role than cultural bias when making this opinion, both of which (influences) are backed by the same decision.
@@rashidsabri7319 due to it's nature, history is always biased towards someone .
This debate would have resulted in a massive war of succession back in the day.
Why not today
@@matheustroan7224 Because there is no roman empire anymore?
@@juanausensi499 But there could be if we really tried
@@Omar-wr2vk I don't think we really want it...
@@juanausensi499
:)
U sure ?
So to sum it up
The Ottomans via conquest of Constantinople.
Spain via legal Will of the last Byzantine emperor.
Russia via a Czar's marriage with Byzantine nobility and the Orthodox Church
Austrian/Habsburg via successor to the Holy Roman Empire United under Charlemagne with a nod from the Pope.
Napoleon via conquering what was the holy Roman empire/Austrian empire. Also with a nod from the Pope.
I'm sure I missed things but it really depends on what you value more to be considered qualified to be a successor. Marriage/bloodline, legality, holding a capital city or military conquest of Roman lands.
Ok I never considered the aspect of the Legal document and the aspect of law but this makes a lot of sense
Also Romans: "Stop quoting laws to those of us with swords"
(Alledgedly) spoken by Pompey during the siege of a fortress loyal to cesar in the civil war. Those were the words of a terroristic rebel/freedom fighter (depending on perspective).
Most romans were quite the opposite, they took pride in their legalism.
Patrician Romans , Like any othr corrupt aristocratic group through-out hstory , quotd Laws and ruLes whn-evr suitd thm, but wr fast quik to dsmis Laws ruLes whn-evr convnient
@@mikeottawa8158 did you overdose on stupid pills?
@@mikeottawa8158 Why do you hate vowels so much?
My heart wants to believe King Felipe is the rightful heir. But my head tells me it's Dundar ali Osman. After all, legalism is all well and good, but even in Roman law, possession is 9/10ths of the law. If a man murdered the previous emperor and was proclaimed the new emperor by the religious leaders and the military... he was emperor. There are many examples from Roman history of such usurpers.
"and as we all know the best roman emperors were the one's with beards"
*Laughs in Trajan*
Trajan born in...
Nero....
*Laughs in Augustus*
Caracalla
Who was one of the Hispanic (as in, comming from the province of Hispania) emperors. Checkmate.
Oh hey it's Stephan Milo! A welcome surprise
I also would say King Felipe has the best claim, made the same conclusion like you, the law!