James May still isn't convinced by electric cars
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 03. 2024
- James May has owned numerous EVs of different kinds, including two Teslas and a couple of hydrogen fuel cell Toyotas, but he still has major reservations about them.
The former Top Gear host turned Grand Tour presenter explains why battery-electric cars don't work for everybody, why the charging infrastructure is so far behind where we need it to be and why he still uses a diesel VW Polo for longer journeys.
You can watch our full 90-minute podcast with James May (episode 200) on our CZcams channel, or listen wherever you get your podcasts.
#jamesmay #topgear #cars
The best writers, the finest stories and no ads, all on The Intercooler’s beautiful online car magazine. Visit www.the-intercooler.com and start your 30-day free trial today. - Auta a dopravní prostředky
That has to be by far the most balanced commentary on EVs vs ICEs I've come across in quite some time. James May is just so fair-minded, eloquent, and comprehensive in his thinking. I find this topic uneccessaily fraught and littered with ideologues on both sides of the 'debate'. This really is the most sensible discussion I've heard on the topic for quite some time.
Agree 100%. So much modern discourse is dominated by small groups of people stood at the extremes screaming abuse at each other. We need more James Mays.
Agreed. I recently bought an EV and absolutely love it. However I recognise it fits an extremely niche lifestyle- and I have a Diesel Van as a backup. It's laughable the amount of "Won't it explode?" "Don't you need to rewire your house to charge it?" "Aren't you destroying the planet driving that?" nonsense I was presented by from people who don't drive them though. It's a good bit of kit- in many ways superior to my previous petrol car. But then the comparison is a bit like an electric drill vs a screwdriver. In a city- makes sense. On a desert Island, it doesn't. Which is better? Depends.
@@hamsterminatoragree 100% what you said, but James's comment, if the tech says the same is just plain stupid, why do they say that in there argument about EV's. Of course it will keep improving, look at the last 5 or 10 years.
Completely agree.
Clicked on this dreading a daft one-sided argument, because that's how most EV commentary goes. But it's James May, so I shouldn't have been worried. As an EV "evangelist" - I love my car, and I preach that (some) EVs are brilliant to drive - my position is the same as May's. Even in a Tesla, charging is nowhere near ideal. And outside of Tesla, it's rubbish.
I'm an optimist, and I think we'll get there. But today it, undeniably, only works if you can charge at home, and if you're willing to put up with a bit of extra planning and hassle on longer trips. For many people today, they're suitable, and I hate that some of those people are put off by the FUD spread by petro-sexuals and certain parts of our "media". But EV evangelists will all too frequently gloss over the problems.
James is spot on. I’ve had 3 EV’s and own both EV and Gas/Petrol cars. When we drive around town the EV is great. When we take a trip we take a gas car. Very common sense talk.
Let me guess, company cars right?
No one is silly enough to buy 3 EV's out of their own pocket, correct?
id rather road trip in an electric, teslas chargin infrastructure is common enough and its way cheaper than gas. id rather save a few hundred bucks than an hour of extra charge time.
@@odisy64 The nonsense that we would need millions of chargers :D I have anti EV rhetoric wrapped up in pretend pro EV comments. This video is a shocker.
@@cannavaras He's actually being rather optimistic considering the electrical grid is decades away and there just arent enough raw materials available atm.
@@odisy64 for the moment but for anyone without a Tesla they are planning to over triple charging rates.
Very well-reasoned comments. I’ve owned an EV for almost 5 years now and if anyone ever asks me if they should get one I always say, “It depends what you need it for.” I’m fortunate enough to have a driveway and 99% of my journeys are shorter than my car’s range. An EV makes sense for me but not for everyone of course.
Very sensible perspective, as I'd expect from a super-intelligent shade of the colour blue.
Kind of you to say so; you’re clearly a highly-evolved person, Dude!
He barely touched how the infrastructure can’t support even 50% of people using EV.
Not to mention, the horrible strip mining for cobalt.
"I’m fortunate enough to have a driveway..."
Exactly and that is the issue for the vast majority of future drivers who don't.
I agree 100%
Former CTO of an EV charging company here: James hit it on the head. Most people would be happy to own a quieter, more responsive vehicle that is cheaper to run. However, it's only cheaper for people with home charging who don't have to rely on public charging. There are some real elitist 'fanboys' when it comes to EVs, they don't seem to understand that spending up to 2 hours in a queue for a public charger because you aren't lucky enough to have charging at home and at work just isn't a practical way to live. Try telling your boss, your customers or your patients that you will be anywhere from 30 minutes to 3 hours depending if you can charge your car.
"However, it's only cheaper for people with home charging who don't have to rely on public charging. There are some real elitist 'fanboys' when it comes to EVs, they don't seem to understand that spending up to 2 hours in a queue for a public charger because you aren't lucky enough to have charging at home and at work just isn't a practical way to live"
👆That should be in the brochures of all BEV's...
Great point.
I often think that governments who are pushing for ev ownership would be better off working on making solar power systems and batteries cheaper for their people. Encouraging evs and pushing out internal combustion vehicles without a proper charging infrastructure is putting the cart before the horse a bit.
@@Fitaroy Or installing more hydrogen infrastructure so people will actually buy the cars...
@@Johny40Se7en people should decide whether ev is right for them. Not the government
@@Fitaroy "people should decide whether ev is right for them. Not the government"
And why you telling me that?...
very real and balanced talk. May was always the most honest and sensible one.
I think the only part I was surprised he didn't bring up is the charging is dependent on the charger working (an increasing and significant number of chargers are broken and you can't tell on the app). Also, there's other videos about charging EVs and the chargers "work" but their fast charging doesn't work and you have to switch to one of the other chargers to get true fast charging. There's also some problems with people just parking in the EV charging spots (worst offenders in New York are city and county owned vehicles).
I think though that if we keep going, even though it's not a consumer friendly tech today, (and push hard enough via government regulation) the gas stations are going to have to read the writing on the wall and convert some of their space to EV chargers or risk seeing an erosion in their business. The average EV customer could even be more profitable than the average ICE customer for them since gas stations have tiny margins on gas and large margins on their convenience store and I can see EV customers spending more in the convenience store because they have to kill more time. Albeit it may still be less profitable at the end of the day because of the slow turnover rate. Ideally, we could use an app like AirBnB to maybe rent someone else's home charger to charge up your EV on road trips. But unfortunately most homes do not have fast chargers, so there are still major problems with this if they can't improve charging speeds.
only thing more real would be admitting that electric engines are not really that low maintenance. In teslas they seem to be doing about the same as small capacity petrol engines - about 100k miles or less. There is a known case of the guy that did over 2 Million km on his tesla model s. he had electric engine replaced 14 times. no joke.
That is if you opt to change the electric motor. You could just have it rebuilt. I'm sure now that the first 2 years of the model 3s are out of warranty that will become a more popular route.
@@arsss233latvietis Im pretty sure those windings are all in resin and tesla does not provide any data on those. Or the spare parts for that matter. I guess its possible to rebuild it but i wonder would it be any cheaper.
@@hagestad I'm sure once they get to eastern europe people will figure it out. At the end of the day it is a lot simpler than an internal combustion engine. Only problem is with right to repair and if people will be allowed to work on what they own. I want to see a world where a 2017 model 3 is treated like a beater e46 in 10 years. Model s is already getting in to the 7 series depreciation range.
It is so rare to hear an intelligent discussion on both the strengths and current weaknesses of EV’s. Bravo.
That was a very unintelligent discussion, try and work out why.
@@Renegade040 and I suspect suitably edited.
We already have more charging stations than petrol stations here in the UK. James is talking rubbish saying "we need a million EV charging stations". Electricity storage is NOT a problem now with current EV technology. The Lucid Air can do up to 520 miles on a single charge and the average daily commute is 20 - 30 miles. You can charge an electric car "ANYWHERE" where there is electricity - and you CANNOT charge a ICE vehicle "anywhere" - you have to find a fuel station (whereas in an EV you only need to find an electrical outlet eg., the nearest house). Electricity is more prolific than dirty fuel stations. I charge my Tesla Model Y at home and every day I have a full state of charge ready for up to 331 miles (WLPT) range. Cost to fill up at a supercharger is around £25 compared to £100 for my old dirty diesel. Cost to charge at home is a lot less - and when I get my solar panels this year it will be free. I used to be a "petrol head" but now I own an EV I will never go back to an ICE vehicle. They are faster, cheaper to run, low maintenance, more reliable, and better for the planet.
@@SmartMart1658YOU have a home where you can charge your EV, not everyone lives in a home. A lot of people live in rental apartments that don’t have chargers, where are they supposed to charge their cars? Sit at a charging station for 30 minutes before going home from work?
To be fair James did say "Anywhere" when referring to refueling an ICE vehicle which is similar to saying you can charge your EV "Anywhere" There is a wider availability of electrical sockets than fuel stations for sure. When a lot of those sockets are above ground level or not close enough to put your ev next to it no longer is anywhere. Of course once fuel stations close the gap will shrink. I have an ebike and I can take my battery out and charge it indoors that's closer to Anywhere there is a socket.@@SmartMart1658
That was both extremely sensible and enjoyable! Thanks James.
Very well said.. He sums it up so well... "the ambition is way ahead of the technology"
A lot of common sense there as ever from James May.
Certainly more than can be said for many of the comments here!
It does sound sensible but I struggle to relate the charging issues to my own lived experience. I have had only BEV cars since 2017 and fairly regularly do six or seven hour journeys and I don't seem to find myself being inconvenienced by charging. In fact I'd say I spend far less time waiting for my car to fill up than I did when running petrol cars. Charging at home helps of course.
No, it's that stupid statement, he lost me when he said, if the current tech stays the same, of course it wont. And that millions of charging stations, total rubbish.
Really?
@@Renegade040 Why is millions of charging stations rubbish? If you count the at home charging stations it is about what you would need for a country the size of UK. And to charge all the cars you would still need at least a 50% increase in power generation, and at least double the grid capacity. Total ev adoption makes sense for a country like Norway where there is an energy excess, but for the rest of the world you would need accompanying colossal infrastructure projects even with any tech advancements in battery tech.
He’s such a well-spoken, well-reasoned human. What a legend. Always with mindful and pertinent insight. I especially love listening to him discuss history. He’s got a passion for learning and teaching. In another life, he’d have made a brilliant Professor.
I am glad that he isn't a professor, because he wouldn't be reaching as many people if he were.
He is a teacher, he has tough as all lots. Just not from a school class room
Consequently, he must be taken off air immediately!
?
Also, the colbot mines and children and disadvantage people mining them. Soon it will be a ethical issue.
Finally, a logical and unbiased take on the power sources for cars. The only thing James didn’t bring up was the fact some people physically couldn’t own an EV. My parents live in a terrace house with no driveway or garage and they can’t legally run a charging cable over a public footpath for safety reasons. There’s many properties like that in the UK as well as highrise flats and apartments with no private garages. People who live in these places couldn’t run any kind of chargeable electric car even if they wanted to.
Due to the density of housing in the UK I argue that the vast majority of current car drivers can not charge at home or work. There is going to be a major issue when the ban on new ICE car sales comes into effect. We know how poor the UK is at major infrastructure projects.
@@zed351 They rush ahead with approving major projects and schemes and watch it inevitably fall flat on its face when it either goes millions over budget or problems develop that weren’t even considered. Been like it for years in this country.
@@zed351 The vast majority can obviously charge at home. All that's needed is the infrastructure and laws to support it.
@logitech4873 a small thing
Not to mention cost, I mean I'm not from a POOR family by any global standards (middle-class would be the word, by Scandinavian standards anyway) and there's just no way anyone in my family could realistically afford an EV. Or at least, it's not such an advantage that it's worth taking out a massive loan over. I'm from the countryside, the house I was raised in cost about half that of a modern Tesla (in 1995 mind you, but still) and 40-50-60 thousand pounds (at a minimum, usually plenty more) for a car is just fantasy given that my dad has never spent more than a couple grand on a car. Sure, that's because he's a bit cheap and doesn't really care what he drives, not because he couldn't actually afford something for a bit more, but the point remains even "sensible" EVs usually cost more than homes where I'm from. Given all the downsides of an EV, especially in rural areas in a very cold country like mine with long distances, to a lot of people EVs really are just a fantasy
Will never ever ever own an appliance that doesn't fit in my kitchen. Never the garage
Very sensible conversation from a person that knows what there talking about
He knows all about gin.
He thinks electricity is a mystery though
@@mablesfatalfable6021 You never heard of battery recycling apparentely.
Nor the new battery chemisteries like LFP that doesn't require cobalt or nickel.
You are not an expert too!
@@pxidr Battery recycling is not economical. It's expensive and very energy intensive to breakdown an EV battery. So much so, it's just easier to mine for more materials.
The same is true in general for recycling. So much stuff we toss into the recycling bin just ends up being shipped away where is then dumped, like e-waste and plastics. It's too costly to recycle, but we create NIMBY programs to give us the illusion of renewal.
He knows what he's talking about, but he's on his 6th EV 🤔
Toyota was heavily criticized for sticking with hybrids for so long, and now everyone is realizing that hybrids are very sensible.
At least here in the northeast US, some dealers are struggling to sell their electric cars now.
They’re soul crushing to drive, usually underpowered with their CVTs. The only exception is the hybrid max, in the Lexus RX500h.
@@mervinproneToyotas are perfect commute tools
Ive always liked the Prius you can even follow a youtube video to replace the NiMH battery pack and it costs about £1500 for a diy owner to buy one brilliant. a used Prius with a flat battery is worth buying if you easily follow a youtube video and puit in a new battery yourself. more cars should be like this.
Sticking with Hybrids because they lack most of the fundamental technologies to compete in the BEV sector. I mean, just look at the BEVs Toyota/Lexus released so far -- horrible horrible range, last-gen software, outdated battery tech, and grossly overpriced because they had to source tech and components from external vendors thus can't keep the cost down
@@mtx1212 they’re developing a solid state battery so that’s their focus at the moment. Time will tell if it pays off.
Very reasonable and well reasoned description of the state of play at the moment. But I would add that battery technology is developing faster than has been previously assumed, which may point to a brighter/nearer future for BEVs.
...Though infrastructure (generation/distribution and recharging points) is lagging behind - so the large-battery requirement will persist for a while...
Brilliant James! I could listen to this guy for hours on any subject
A very balanced consideration, I thought. I agree with Mr May pretty much 100%. I'm off to fuel up my V8 now though...
LOL. I really have just done that. In 3 minutes.
Faced with uninspiring EVs and Jaguar (my long preference) dropping ICE I have just bought a 17 year old 5.4 V8 Merc SLK as my backup fun car and cannot see why it would go, barring total mechanical failure. Nothing sounds like it. I feel sorry for generations who won't experience such things.
A good balanced view from May here.
@@Bader1940 Funnily enough, the V8 I just filled up was a Jaguar. It turns dead dinosaurs in lovely noises.
Filled up my 70 series TDV8 GXL LandCruiser ute this morning... Cost me nearly two hundred and fifty Australian dollaydoos.
And she wasn't quite empty 😭
Lucky I can write the tax off or it would hurt like hell. I don't understand people who use a vehicle like that as their daily wheels. I only have it because literally nothing else can do what I expect that beast to get done.
@@GeordieAmanda those Jag V8s make a dirty, dirty noise... They should be sold as an aphrodisiac, guaranteed to excite testosterone and drop panties.
@@GeordieAmanda Those Jag V8s make a dirty, dirty noise. I get too excited whenever I hear one
Love listenening to James and he's always quite sensible. One other significant con that James may not have mentiond because he's rich: it's currently difficult or impossible for people who live in aparment buildings in large cities and park on the street to charge their vehicles (and not pay the significantly higher cost of using public chargers).
I'm not sure if this is relevant to the discussion but one other con at least in the US is the cost of insurance for EVs. Ordinary shops cannot repair them so only the manufacturer can get parts and work on them. Maintenance and repair tends to be much more expensive than the equivalent ICE automobile so insurance rates are much higher.
He did mention it at 4:55 quite specifically. He even pointed out it isn't a concern for him because he is rich.
And if they do manage to charge their car in the city some lowlife will just steal their charging cable for the copper or to resell it on eBay.
This is also why once cars become fully-automated, the majority of people will simply use a subscription service and the cars will live in giant carparks.
Not to mention, there is pretty much no "banger" second hand market for EV's since the battery packs are the most expensive part of them. Once they go out the car is basically worthless.
So anyone with a low income could never afford one since the value of the batteries alone is way higher than any cheap ICE car is.
I respect Mr May’s point about the need for MUCH more available charging. Much of that infrastructure needs to go where there is significant “dwell time”, i.e. places where people are spending significant time like restaurants, hotels, workplaces, and shopping centers. This can serve to reduce the demand on DC fast chargers and free them up for those who are traveling longer distances.
EVs are already an order of magnitude better than they were even a decade ago. Range, charging speed, and cost have all improved considerably. There’s no reason to think this progress is going to halt now that there’s a valid market out there.
God, how I miss hearing people have an intelligent conversation about something interesting. Great segment!
James May is such a smart man. Refreshing to hear someone speak rationally about the pros and cons of EVs.
The recharge anxiety is so true, I was recently given a Tesla Model Y rental as I was in a couple different cities for work. Holy damn it was genuinely frightening trying to find a charger, let alone a fast one, that was actually working with less than 10% charge left in the battery. I must say I really enjoyed driving it and really would consider owning one, but if/when you’re on a tight schedule and need a quick and reliable way of “topping up” the car in a pinch, at the moment it’s not a good way to go
Where were you? The outer Hebrides?
.
Tesla alone has over 160 *supercharger* locations in the UK (plus destination chargers) and when you navigate to "a destination" will tell you where they are en-route, which one to use, how long to get there, how much charge (and range) you will have when you arrive, how long you will need to charge, and when you hit "navigate" will warm the pack to improve speed, plus it will indicate the facilities available.
.
As for "A couple of different cities", presumably you were in the area for "a while"? In which case the trick is to graze charge on a "slow" unit and top up while you "do something else".
Then, assuming you were in "a couple of different (unspecified) cities in 1 day(?) they weren't going to be *too* far apart to allow actually making the appointments? Since you have about 300 miles in a Y, which equates to 5 hours average UK driving you would be "going some" to use that in a day without encountering somewhere to charge?
I mean, did you stop for lunch?
.
I speak as a mobile service technician who may travel "between a couple of different cities" in a day, but always finds time for a 30 minute (or more) break at some point.
It's "difficult" to do more than 200 miles in a day if you're actually being productive, spending time "on site".
.
Oh... As for finding one "working"... Tesla chargers have an "up time" of 99+% and your chances of finding a complete 8-24 charger site down are virtually zero. (Did I mention *they indicate the state of the chargers on the map* ?)
I had range anxiety for at most two weeks after buying my Tesla you soon realise there's no such thing. The nav computer is very good at estimating real range. If it says you can make you can make it. In any case superchargers are everywhere now
@@rogerstarkey5390Not everyone must live and think like you. Stop being an authoritarian.
@@rogerstarkey5390yeah um I'm in New Zealand haha. The number of charging stations are increasing, but the problem here is there are a lot of third party charging stations (hence the "not working" comment). And there were a couple stations the car directed me to simply didn't exist, which was not fun especially as I was not a local.
And no, I wasn't in each city for "a while", I work in TV. Not sure how much you know about that industry but deadlines are not lenient, work days can get upwards of 15 hours depending on the project, and distances traveled can wildly vary on each job. On this particular occasion it happened to be a very long day with a lot of ground covered.
So the combination of being in a unfamiliar place with unreliable charging stations that either didn't work or didn't exist, coupled with working in a full-throttle industry where the deadline was two hours ago is the reasoning to my original comment. Have a good day :)
@@AdrianMeredithtotally agree, and with a good plan there shouldn't be a reason to run out of charge and be stranded. Having said that I live in New Zealand where superchargers aren't as common - we're still catching up down here!
I think changing the term from range anxiety to charging anxiety is the perfect description of what's going on. It's the uncertainty of so many things when you need to recharge that's the real issue.
1: You have to hope that the charging stations are perfectly lined up for your trip. If they aren't then you are needlessly charging too often and wasting time.
2: Every charging session can be a wildly different experience because there are many factors at play. EVs charge at different rates depending on the current state of charge so you often don't receive the maximum charging speeds that are quoted by manufacturers. The charging curve is also heavily dependent upon the temperature of your battery which is negatively affected by both hot and cold temperatures. You really need to live in a California like climate to have the goldilocks conditions required to charge at maximum efficiency. Even still, most EV buyers don't know anything about charging curves and will pull into a 350kw charger in a vehicle that can only accept 50kw and effectively block up the station.
3: You are also dependent on the reliability of the charging station itself which varies wildly depending on who operates it. Non-supercharger networks are notorious for being having problems with even being able to start a charging session. Constant payment failures, handshake failures with the car, and full-on outages are not uncommon at all. It would be ridiculous to an ICE driver to be required to have an app to fill up at a Shell station or whetever but that is often required at EV charging stations. Even the Tesla supercharger network, which is by far the best in the world, is unable to provide the full power that the car is able to accept if the station is full because the chargers share power and only have so much that can be provided in total at one time.
4: Home charging alleviates much of this, but you are then dealing with charging that takes many hours to complete. What happens when you get home from work and with a relatively low battery that you plug into your level 2 charger that will finish charging 8 hours from now and you suddenly have an emergency of any kind that requires more range than is currently available? Are you supposed to drive to the nearest fast charger and hope it works and still sit there for 15 minutes to be able to reach your destination?
5: Fast charging continues to get more and more expensive. It is not uncommon for fast charging to be an insignificant savings over gas and yet you don't get the benefit of a 4-minute fill up.
I'm an early adopter type that understands the cons of this and might be willing to deal with it for the pros of an EV, but there is no way that any of this is ready for the mainstream yet. As James mentioned, the adoption rate of EVs far exceeds the buildout of the infrastructure necessary to service it. This is a market that needs to be allowed to mature naturally, but emissions standards and tax credits are creating a problem that is going to hit hard in the near future.
Glad to hear a balanced voice. On my third EV now. Yes, range is still an issue. I feel batteries need to improve to store about 50% more for the same price.
I don’t mind the charging time, but yes more charging stations would be nice in some areas.
Batteries are now £50 or less per kwh. That means you can get 100kwh, good for over 400 miles in summer, for £5k. vThat will be less than the cost of an ICE with its attendant gubbins.
This was a very intelligent discussion about EV's.
Yes, it was respectful, but I fail to see intelligence here.
Really?
Neither do you apparently@@mablesfatalfable6021
We already have more charging stations than petrol stations here in the UK. James is talking rubbish saying "we need a million EV charging stations". Electricity storage is NOT a problem now with current EV technology. The Lucid Air can do up to 520 miles on a single charge and the average daily commute is 20 - 30 miles. You can charge an electric car "ANYWHERE" where there is electricity - and you CANNOT charge a ICE vehicle "anywhere" - you have to find a fuel station (whereas in an EV you only need to find an electrical outlet eg., the nearest house). Electricity is more prolific than dirty fuel stations. I charge my Tesla Model Y at home and every day I have a full state of charge ready for up to 331 miles (WLPT) range. Cost to fill up at a supercharger is around £25 compared to £100 for my old dirty diesel. Cost to charge at home is a lot less - and when I get my solar panels this year it will be free. I used to be a "petrol head" but now I own an EV I will never go back to an ICE vehicle. They are faster, cheaper to run, low maintenance, more reliable, and better for the planet.
@@SmartMart1658You’re the reason people hate EVs. They don’t actually hate EVs, they hate people like you who demand everyone to think…just like you do.
Good to see you James!
Miss you and your crew from back in the Top Gear days.
Cheers!
Totally agree. I drive a 2023 Model Y LR in rural US, love it. The real challenge is grid issues in the near future.
From another EV + ICE owner, great commentary, thank you as ever, James May. I also understood this as a plea for our governments to move much of the subsidy funding over to chargers and the electricity infrastructure we need to electrify society. Companies like Octopus UK already exist with a mission to build the energy storage and Demand Management infrastructure out of millions of our BEVs sitting at chargers across the country.
"charge anxiety" is spot on. Imagine a scenario where you can only "practically" charge your phone at home...this would be a pain to say the least. The EV industry definitely needs some catching up but I I think it's heading in the right direction.
But I do only charge my phone at home?
I charge my phone at home
Keeping you at home is all part of the plan !!
@simont53 No, that's why we don't have "charge anxiety" with our phones.
Imagine 170,000 trouble free miles and being told by people with 0 or close to 0 telling me how it is. I’ve never had a dead battery.
His opinion is more positive, and more nuanced, than the title would suggest IMO.
Quite so. His trouble wasn't with the EV battery or design flaws, it was with lack of charging stations for the most part lol.
Classic click bait title 😊
@@Sarevok_Winsthey are all connected though. It blew my mind how many electrics were selling in places like South East Asia where the grid is shoddily built, charging station is non-existent and electricity is still produced mostly through burning coals or unreliable hydropower. This is all not bringing in the point he made about EVs that they are large and bulky because of the charging infrastructure which is caused by battery technology not being mature enough to charge fast or hold onto enough power etc… EVs are awesome but we are all not quite there yet, yet there’s a push to transition to them “no matter the cost”. Which seems a little too premature in my opinion. I would rather have more electrified vehicle in the form of public transport.
@@Sarevok_Wins But given current battery tech, you would require an obscene amount of charging stations.
I am living on the South coast of England and I am from North Manchester, so it stands to reason this is generally my journey a few times of the year. I am about to take delivery of an EV. My journey North will not change, I have my favourite stopover generally half way which is around 125 miles and takes on average 2.15 minutes each leg of a good day. After two hours of driving my legs are killing me am in need to a leg stretch. My EV will charge in 18 minutes from 0 to 80% in the right conditions, which means that I complete my journey in the exact same way as my ICE car. The big way it changes everything is that my daily commute to work which is 98 miles. My EV should be able to do this in two drives between charging at home, meaning that the cost of my Journey is around £2.50 per day. Whereas my Polo 1ltr is £13 per day. My fuel budget is £320 per month, so If I have need to top up on a public charger at £0.75p Per KWH then this is something that still sits in my budget, so for me it is a no brainer. What you do, what suits you is something that will need to weigh up.
What could change soon is the advent of the Solid State Battery from what I have seen that would be a game changer because they would be cheaper to produce, safer in the event of a collision and are far more efficient in delivery of the power so they would double the range of EVs overnight and on the right charger would charge in 5 minutes.
My brother on the other hand has listened to all the crap about electric cars and is absolutely against them despite his daily commute of 6 miles.
£13 for a 95 journey in a 1L polo? Does that include tolls??? Electric isn’t the answer for most people. Unless you want the inconvenience of charging for the long trip (work conference, the airport, a wedding, holiday etc.) electric needs thinking about and planning. Most people don’t want to do that, or need to with petrol. What’s the answer two cars??? The tech isn’t there yet. The benefit of electric isn’t there for the consumer and the emissions benefit is a fallacy.
@@jimthompson9370 Most people? I think you mean YOU. Of course the tech is there, just the investment from the UK government isn't. Emissions a fallacy, come and stand behind my EV and I will move so it actually runs the motor. The I will switch on your ICE engine and see how long you can stand behind it before you have to move, are physically sick or die. Of course if you tolerate a government that supports coal fired power stations it will take longer to catch up with the co2 usage but don't forget all that carcinogenic crap you get from burning petrol and diesel every time you start your ICE car.
Also given that our power grids are already being pushed to the breaking point on a mildly warm day when everyone's AC kicks on, how is it going to have enough capacity to handle a pretty large chunk of the energy currently being provided by gasoline being used as fuel in a combustion engine? Our power grid is barely able to keep up with population growth, let alone supplanting one of the worlds largest energy industries.
I am just awaiting arrival of my first EV, and have found it quite the minefield researching to see if it would work ok for me. It is eally nice to see a conversation without entrenched views from each side or another.
The only reason I'm getting an EV, is that the majority of my miles are done within a ~30m radius, and I am able to have a charger fitted at home.
Were my travel habits as they were prior to 2018, involving the majority of them being done on the motorway. I'd be getting another ICE.
I've waited in line 15-20 minutes to refill the tank on my car before.
Imagine how long the wait would be if everybody had EVs even with 30 minute charge times.
Only 24 hours in a day.
Dont have to. there was a video recently of a cold snap causing 24 hr lines at a charger. I think it was in chicago. EVs dont do well in cold weather. They can even discharge themselves.
It's a chicken and egg thing. If everyone had EV's there would be more charging stations. It's not as if the first ICE cars appeared and there were immediately fueling stations on every corner.
@@dizzy_derps But there are fueling stations on every corner and I've still had to wait 20 minutes before.
The problem is that the goverment are expecting the private sector to pick up the bill for millions of EV chrgers, there is no local council funding because they are all bankrupt or skint , the infrastructure is just not going to be there in time.
@@twjackson94 which all would have been avoided if most of them just put the charger into the nav so it can preheat
I remember having severe range anxiety in the past , late on a Sunday afternoon in rural Wales, there were no open petrol stations to be found. It was perhaps my fault for not planning ahead. An advantage of EV chargers is that the majority are available 24/7, and easily found.
Things change all of the time.
I guess the best way to solve this, in my view, is this:
Everyone who can already make the BEV work in their everyday life should. Everyone who is stuck in a town with no public infrastructure and so on - wait a bit longer.
The former group is probably about 50 % of the nation. The latter will continuously shrink.
Hope so.
Unsurprisingly, a very balanced and accurate discussion about the advantages and drawbacks of both. I've owned an EV, Tesla Model 3 and it was as an interesting experience. I enjoyed it in a lot of ways, was frustrated by many things covered here. Comically enough, when I let go of the EV, I purchased a full size truck with a V8.
Imagine logic and reasoning taking center stage. Well done boys. If only politicians could come to anything close to this 🏛️😯🏛️🏛️
We already have more charging stations than petrol stations here in the UK. James is talking rubbish saying "we need a million EV charging stations". Electricity storage is NOT a problem now with current EV technology. The Lucid Air can do up to 520 miles on a single charge and the average daily commute is 20 - 30 miles. You can charge an electric car "ANYWHERE" where there is electricity - and you CANNOT charge a ICE vehicle "anywhere" - you have to find a fuel station (whereas in an EV you only need to find an electrical outlet eg., the nearest house). Electricity is more prolific than dirty fuel stations. I charge my Tesla Model Y at home and every day I have a full state of charge ready for up to 331 miles (WLPT) range. Cost to fill up at a supercharger is around £25 compared to £100 for my old dirty diesel. Cost to charge at home is a lot less - and when I get my solar panels this year it will be free. I used to be a "petrol head" but now I own an EV I will never go back to an ICE vehicle. They are faster, cheaper to run, low maintenance, more reliable, and better for the planet.
@@SmartMart1658 Classic EV evangelist ignorance.
First off, there may be more charging stations if you count home charging, but if you compare that to how many people are catered to by charging points vs petrol stations, that's a HUGE gap.
I have a driveway, I think EV's are great, I could charge one at home, wouldn't be a problem, I will likely buy an EV in the next decade or so (though, it'll be parked next to my Mustang GT, because being a petrolhead is a passion, not something that just vanishes when convenient.)
Does everyone share my fortunate situation? No. Many people can't even park on the road directly in front of their house, the infrastructure required to bring home charging to everyone is insanely expensive and would indeed require millions of charging ports, unless you're ignorant to the situation of people who aren't as privileged as yourself. Many people have cheap hatchbacks, often used, and refuel them in minutes. Electric cars are barely as affordable, although I like some options such as the Fiat 500e, that's still a car many in this country can't afford.
Currently, EV charging stations are not perfect, and they're growing increasingly expensive too, for many people working two jobs, the time is not workable.
The fact is, for millions of people in this country, your situation is alien to them, and wouldn't work for them. They DO need to charge away from home, they DO lack time, they WOULD struggle with charging stations that grow increasingly busy.
They are faster if you buy expensive, although I have yet to see Top Fuel drag racing become Top Battery racing.
They are cheaper to run if you're wealthier and can afford one, which many can't.
They're better for the environment (if you ignore the effects of lithium mining, and the way electricity is made), but so is a Bus, yet you don't take that, do you?
You've done nothing but prove what we already know, for some they're ideal and can work, but for those some - they think everyone shares their situation with the ignorance we've grown used to in EV evangelists.
More investment in public transport would be better, not shoving everyone into an EV.
James is spot on.
@@SmartMart1658 You're talking cost, while getting subsidies and tax breaks. Once your EV is charged per mile and by weight you'll be crying for your proper car back
@@bigglyguy8429 Lol if you actually paid the fully unsubsidized price for gasoline, you'd be paying $12-$15 a gallon
@@iamsuperflush Pay by weight... by mile or km... ready for that? Is ya? Is ya?
Ev's are horrendous for the environment, the damage done mining the materials for the battery is the equivalent of driving 80000 miles in an ice vehicle
Britain has, like in so many other things, fallen badly behind with its charging network.
Worst thing about this is not infrastructure or time to charge, it is idiocracy of having to download an app and register and do all kind of fiddling for each charging point, and the pain in the ass of not being able to download the app if you’re using the car abroad (ex. Rent a car) because your phone’s app store is in different country than the one you’re in. It only, and only, makes sense if you’re using the car in the city and you have your own charger at home connected to a residential battery storage which is connected to solar panels, which all together costs more than the car and you just can’t justify the price. It literally nothing makes sense.
I think that EU already put a regulation that each newly published charging point should be able to accept a normal bank card as payment.
@@darekmistrz4364 I just want to pay cash.
Sadly that is the beauty of the Tesla Supercharging system. You rock up in any country, plug in and drive away. Tesla charge your payment card based on the ID of the car you plugged in. I presume this is the same for non Tesla's at superchargers but I don't know.
And someone always has a dam answer to try n prove you wrong, so full of hope, so full of themselves thinking they are smarter, its always a frustration conversation as we all have different needs., I truly dont have a cell phone so that's another expense for me, Huhhhh.
@@notverygoodguy unfortunately non-Tesla experience on SC is exactly the same like any other on non-SC.
In Norway, having an EV is a boon. Especially if you have a home charger (or can charge at office). On a long trip, you just have a 30-min break every 2-3 hours which I'd do with an ICE anyway. Plus, I need long range only 3-4 times in a year.
Fairly good points. I personally feel like the bit of inconvenience of waiting for charging occasionally is worth the ability to vastly reduce fossil fuel burning. The savings really add up over the hundreds of thousands of small journeys. I save about $500 per year running my EV vs a gas car. Over a driving career (age 20 to 75), at a 7% return that's $236,000 of savings. Times that by two for a couple. That really adds up.
You are not looking at the entire picture. Your ‘savings’ (and more) are simply the money you need to spend for EV premium (battery maintenance and purchase price vs ICE cars). At present, EVs make financial sense only for a small minority of households with very specific needs and , most importantly, with abundant means.
Try charging outside of the Tesla network. Utilisation has increased so much that you often find 20 minute waiting times to charge your car for 20 minutes to do 200 miles. (If you have something that charges at over 200kwh)
The biggest evidence of this sh*tshow was Car Expert's latest video on how awful the charging experience in the US. They were trying to charge their Rivian for a video on charging but queues upon queues on hours on end just makes it not feasible, some people had to resort to sleep on their car, some people deliberately park their car & not put the charging cable fully just to get that parking space, and so on.
At the end, they just switch the Rivian with the RAV4 Prime (Plug-In Hybrid) to do the video instead.
Correct. We have a Tesla Model 3 and a Volvo C40 recharge. On the few occasions we have driven the Volvo beyond its 210 mile range finding a fast, working charger without a queue has been a shitshow. We don’t bother doing journeys of more than 150 miles in it now. Having said that Tesla superchargers are getting busier and busier as they haven’t built them fast enough to keep up with Model Y sales. We queued at a French service station for the superchargers and observed two guys almost come to blows when one them felt the other had jumped the queue. Who needs that hassle on top of a 14 hour drive across France? That’s why we are going back to hybrid when the EV leases finish.
Still far too long. I can literally go to a fuel station, fill up my entire tank, go for a piss, browse the drinks aisle for a bottled drink, go and pay in and have done all that in 5 minutes or less.
Imagine standing around waiting for 20 minutes for someone to pick you up, or waiting 20 minutes for your food to cook - it's a long time when you want it now. Now imagine waiting 20 minutes sat in your car waiting for it to charge, and that's only a partial charge, and that's if you even get to the charger before someone else does.
What puts me off is the initial cost and silly depreciation. The fact that the batteries are terribly expensive so buying a car out of warranty seems risky. And the fact you need to wait for ages if someone is already on a charger you need. Luckily I have a drive so I could have a charger fitted, but not everyone has a drive.
If my ICE car needs work, I can do it on the drive and get parts pretty cheap.
I'm not brilliant with electronics though and I have little knowledge of electric motors, so fixing an EV would certainly be more of a challenge to me
There's plenty of Tesla chargers and if you are able to charge up at home with a 300 mile range on mine only needs to get charged at a public charger only 4 times per year. It also tells you how many chargers are free in real time.
To charge 50kw battery in 3 mins would take 740amps at 600v, which would necessitate a cable about the size of your leg, multiplied by the number of charging points at any one site, times by the number of sites within range of one transformer i.e. not possible currently
Let's imagine that 99% of cars turned electric tomorrow, do we really think the UK power network is capable of supporting that?
The 350kW charging cables are liquidcooled to be sensible in diameter. And CCS2 goes up to 700 kW with reasonable thickness cables
And where is the electricity coming from? Imagine every carowner charging his car at 18.00PM....
Why would you need to charge in 3 minutes ? At home you have all the night, and on a trip after more than 2 hours of driving a 15 minutes break is just safe.
@@calj2405 I cannot speak for the UK, but in France according to the grid regulator (RTE) the answers is definitively yes. Just because a car is parked most of the time, so the charge can take place when electricity production is higher from demand, and it is already the case because electricity is cheaper when demand is low.
I have recently purchased a tesla, I could finally afford one after approximately ten years after test driving one. Mine is a 2015 model s and I did not buy it for vacation travel or long-range travel, I have two Camaros for that. I bought it strictly for a city car and for a city car it seems far more advanced than anything else!!!!!! I agree with James May that for longer distance it is not fun to sit in a car for 20 to 50 minutes!!!!! I see some places becoming creative with supercharging locations, such as having drive in films, and different stores along with unique coffee shops and it seems that will be the way of the future until the battery situation is improved!!!!! The batteries have come a long way since the 70s, but they still have a long ways to go and in the mean time you might see routes where there are actually tourist attractions about every 100 miles with supercharging available!!!!!!!! I really liked watching your video, it was fantastic!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am on my fourth plug in car.
98% of my charging is at home. We’re putting 40k+ miles on our model 3 per year without issue.
🙄
It comes to something when listening to a few minutes of carefully considered conversation is a rare and wonderful thing. Excellent interview.
listen very carefully to what he said. This has been edited.
We already have more charging stations than petrol stations here in the UK. James is talking rubbish saying "we need a million EV charging stations". Electricity storage is NOT a problem now with current EV technology. The Lucid Air can do up to 520 miles on a single charge and the average daily commute is 20 - 30 miles. You can charge an electric car "ANYWHERE" where there is electricity - and you CANNOT charge a ICE vehicle "anywhere" - you have to find a fuel station (whereas in an EV you only need to find an electrical outlet eg., the nearest house). Electricity is more prolific than dirty fuel stations. I charge my Tesla Model Y at home and every day I have a full state of charge ready for up to 331 miles (WLPT) range. Cost to fill up at a supercharger is around £25 compared to £100 for my old dirty diesel. Cost to charge at home is a lot less - and when I get my solar panels this year it will be free. I used to be a "petrol head" but now I own an EV I will never go back to an ICE vehicle. They are faster, cheaper to run, low maintenance, more reliable, and better for the planet. If I couldn't charge at home eg., if I lived in a flat then I would drive to my local Tesla supercharger and fill up there - same process as filling up at a petrol station. Anyone leaving a charging cable across a public footpath will be liable for any accidents as a result of such stupidity. There are however simple solutions to this problem - you may be able to apply to the council to have a charging cable channel cut into the pavement - see Fully Charged episode titled "A shareable, beginners guide to electric cars with Maddie Moate | Fully Charged" and wwwDOTchargegullyDOTcom
@@SmartMart1658 Rubbish. From your very first sentence. You've been brainwashed.
James is right that the issue is not EVs themselves, it's the battery technology right now. Electric motors make total sense.
Henry Ford said that if he's just asked people what they want, they'd have said 'faster horses'. It's the same problem.
You know what's the most cost-effective way to store energy? Liquid fuels that you can just pump into a tank...
We are about 25-50 years out from having battery technology that can handle EVs.
Im considering getting one because I live in a small island that makes sense. My commute is short, but gas prices are just so out of control. What used to be $50 a month is now $120 a month.
Something i've noticed is that rich people don't tend to talk about the cost.
I know i'm missing something because whenever i look it up i get the answer "EV batteries last around 10 years and it costs £7-9k to replace them", i've heard of battery subscription services and apparently some manufacturers have a warranty on their batteries for 7-10 years, but screw buying a 2nd hand EV if you have to replace the battery in 2 years.
I've probably spent around £2k on repairs for my 2004 Polo.
My dad (and me, to be fair) have never spent more than the rough equivalent (not being British) of 2500 pounds on a car. The house I was raised in is worth a fair bit less than most (all, really) modern EVs cost (my dad having paid the equivalent of about 30 000 pounds for it in 1995). In short, EVs are fantasy to me as well as to most ordinary people from the countryside I know. Not to mention range issues, I mean here in Scandinavia you're likely looking at half the officially stated range during winter time, if that
£7-9k for a battery replacement is not realistic. There are a couple videos on CZcams about battery replacements for the Hyundai Ioniq 5s in Canada that were very slightly damaged and the dealer quoted $60k CAD (including labor charges) to replace the batteries. $60k CAD is about £34,593. I've also seen battery replacements for Teslas here in the U.S. and the quoted prices including labor start in the low $20k range USD. $22k USD is about £17,119.
@@CarShopping101 You are talking about new vehicles. It's the same estimate like new engine for a BMW that you bought off the salon floor last year, it will be about the same price (20k for low power one, and 60k for high power one)
@@CarShopping101 I remember that couple in Scotland whose battery was destroyed by "rain damage" and that was £30k or something, no idea what that was about.
On Point.@@CarShopping101
If the majority of your journeys are within the range of an electric car then they make sense - however if you do a lot of long distances or cannot charge at home then they are almost impossible to justify currently. Why not let people make their own mind up what suits them and then let the technology catch up over time.
The thing is the majority of journeys are well within electric car range. 18 miles per day is the average distance driven, if you can install a homecharger or plug in at work it makes total sense. No ability to charge at home/work then Tesla is next best bet if near a Supercharger. If not then it makes little sense as other charging networks are way more expensive.
'Why not let people make their own mind up what suits them and then let the technology catch up over time.'
Because people in positions of power (I.e. Politicians, scientists, experts etc) are telling the public that we're in a climate emergency, the world is going to burst into flames very soon and the end is nigh unless we all switch to clean energy and electric cars. Although I agree with what you're saying though, let the individual decide what is best for them in the meantime until the technology is more viable!
Problem is that EV evangilists won't let you "Make up your own mind", they demand that they are correct, and you must buy an EV now!@@HammerHeart3229
have you ever heard of the tragedy of the commons? Individuals are inherently selfish and relying on individuals to make decisions in the public interest for everyone else wont happen. That's why we need wider intervention on individual decisions.@@HammerHeart3229
For the govt. to get involved and mandate economic change has never worked in history. It will be a fiasco and cause more damage than it cures.
Toyota knows the industry, I think everyone would agree with that. If you look at what they’re doing, they have gone the hybrid route. It’s the best of both worlds. Excellent economy, and excellent range. My 2013 Lexus es300h has a range of 575 miles on the highway, and gets 40mpg - all while being 11 years old with 114k miles on the clock.
Also a lot of people don’t know this but quick charging, whether it be a phone or a car, causing MUCH more wear on a battery.
90+% of trips made by everyday individuals are under 250m. I’ve had a Tesla for almost a year and only charged at a super charger 2x. While he has a great point, there doesn’t need to be equal amounts of charge stations as gas stations, as everyday someone wakes up to get in their car it’s full. Therefore, every home in a way is a gas pump. But definitely need more charging stations in remote areas for those on long distance trips
the point is that not every home has a charger. not every home has a driveway. millions of people living in flats or in cities like London where parking in front of their home is not guaranteed, and a charger would go across the pavement which is not acceptable.
I miss these guys shows! They were great, especially all the trips.
He touched on an important point, EVs are OK as a second car for rich people.
They're also great as an only car for not rich people.
@@OneWheelManno they aren’t. They are inconvenient at best.
Basicllay a toy
@@OneWheelMan No, they aren't. EV are extremely expensive and they only make sense if your have the luxury of home charging. For many people who are lower income, they have no access to private home charging because they live in apartments or have shared arrangements.
@@OneWheelManif the hypothetical tiny electric car with a 100 mile range actually existed in western countries then yes, they would be great
but so far these tiny people movers are exclusively sold in small pockets in various different markets spread across the globe. the english speaking world is left with the expensive bevs that just don't make sense to own as a daily driver
james speaking like an engineer. i think hes right on target about this.
Interesting fun fact: the lithium mine in Arizona, one of the most efficient lithium minds in the world,used 4,000,000,000 gallons of water in 2022 to produce 2% of the worlds lithium.
In the ev evangelists' minds, there are no negative environmental impacts from their godly green planet-saver status symbols...
@@michaelwarenycia7588EVs don't need to be made of fairydust, but simply having less than half the lifetime environmental impact of ICEs is a start. People really like to ignore the status quo of the externalities of fossil fuel drilling/processing/refining/transportation.
@@zeugundso ..you do realize that they have to drill for, refine and transport the materials involved in making EVs, correct? Also , this lifetime impact figure you give doesn't seem very credible, given reports of how EVs batteries essential become unusable decades before an ice engine would normally need replacement. It's further not credible because there simply aren't enough EVs on the road from 20, 30 or 40 years ago to make a viable comparison.
@@michaelwarenycia7588Theres lots of data if you search "degradation tesla" the mean remaining capacity at 250k km is ~93% of the original capacity. If this is "essentially unusable" I don't know... And yeah batteries are resource intensive, but its all relative and to me the sheer magnitude of the fossil fuel resources ICE cars need are in no comparison to the average EV. Not now and way less in the future.
As there's never going to be (on current rate of progress) Practical EV Farm/Plant/HGV's (Practical in Farm terms is 3-400hp CONSTANT Load, that can work harvest hours (18 hours min) and recharge in a field)
what's going to power them?
A cable. There are already farms that use electric equipment and many of these devices/vechicles are simply powered by a long cable. Farming is pretty easy because it's done in one specific location where infrastructure can be prepared. There are orchards where a cable infrastructure is set up and electric fruit gathering vehicles are powered by cables.
A cable? Hahahahahahaha! This is by far the most ignorant, or possibly insane, comment I have read in 2024.
This seems like a weirdly specific, fringe use case. I suggest we would be better off concentrating on the millions of cars on the road first where we can have the biggest impact. As the technology improves we can start applying it to additional use-cases. That said there are already some options available from the likes of JCB and John Deere that may suit SOME use-cases.
@kevinpeters5000 cars and freight trucks only account for 9-10% of yearly emissions depending on the country. It's insane to focus on that and not the other 90%. 40-50% comes from energy production.
If we greened the Sahara, we would have global net zero emissions without changing anything.
@@solrubrum That would be crazy. But, cars and trucks are not the only thing they're focusing on. There has been massive investment in wind and solar, to the point that solar is now the cheapest form of new bulk power generation there is. There's also been lots of investment in energy storage, including batteries, where there's a lot of overlap with EVs.
Like James May we have both. We have a Tesla Model 3, a Volvo C40 electric and a little petrol Hyundai i10. The real world range of the three cars is 270 miles, 210 miles and 430 miles respectively. This makes the little Hyundai much more relaxing to drive as you simply don’t have to “think” about range. We do drive the Tesla to the Alps a few times a year and at best I would describe that experience as “OK” but at worst a “massive ballache”. When the French farmers recently blockaded the highways we were stuck in solid traffic through back roads and nearly ran out of battery in the Tesla. We limped into a supercharger station on 1% battery remaining. Anxiety levels were through the roof. So much so that we have decided to replace the Tesla with a diesel or a hybrid when its lease ends.
According to EV fans, such emergency will never arise. I had an EV, and I think they are great but it has many limitations and freedom of traveling really depends on your charge and charger availability.
I got stuck in the French blockades turning a 4 hour journey into an 8 hour trek and had no problem with my Telsa. It automatically rerouted me at each obstacle and I charged each time with no trouble. The thing about electric cars is that you can be stuck for hours in traffic and you don't use any energy. If you don't move then you don't lose "fuel" like a normal car stuck in traffic.
btw when you hit 0% you still have a 40km reserve. My last range anxiety was coming back from a ski resort where there are no chargers and in theory I wouldn't be able to make it back on the charge I would have. I trusted my Tesla and because of it being downhill the regen braking meant I got to the charger on the way back with 25% battery still left!
Phillip.
How many people do you think will drive "to the alps a few times a year" - from the UK? This is an irrelevant use case for 99.99% of the people. Just get a Diesel for those trips if you really have to do them by car and have range anxiety. For me, such trips would just be a pain in the ass in any kind of car.
@@JumpinJackF I can do cross country with my EV no problem but then I don't live in the UK any more. I've heard about how catastrophically bad things are there and yes you are better off with a diesel. With Sunak cancelling the push towards EV I cannot see things getting any better there this decade.
Phillip.
The duranged pro ev culists insist to me to tell you that you running out of battery simply is indeed not a problem. 🤡💩
I agree with much of what he's said. I just purchased a 2016 Tesla S 90D. Stole it, really, but the range & charge times are a thing. What will make things so much better is when I get a charger in my home. That should solve most everything, as I think it does for most Tesla owners.
I’m on my second Tesla and I agree with James on chargers. The cars themselves are fantastic and I do most charging at home, but for longer journeys charging used to be fine but there are more and more on the roads. A few weeks ago I have to queue for 40 mins at a service station, very early on a Sunday morning. I dread to think how busy they are at peak times. I plan to get a 911 when the lease goes back
Now imagine when there are millions of drivers who have no home charging, all hunting for a Sunday morning charger.
A very sensible interview. Clear explanation where the pain “sits”. As an EV driver, privately owned, I recognize the long loading times but then again I have all the time in the world so I don’t mind. On the other hand is driving an EV very comfortable and very economical. The Tesla Supercharger network is quit dense here on the mainland so not a problem at all. Charging at home with solarpanels is ofcourse free.
Are you god having all the time in the world?
aaand you completely missed the point. it may be fine for YOU, but YOU have a privileged position of not giving a sh*t about loading times, and charging at home with solar panels. but the problem is you are a single person (or household) whereas the EV is being pushed to everyone when there's a very small demographic in your position compared to rest of the populace. Would you be thinking the same if you were living in a crappy apartment complex having to work 2 or 3 jobs just to make ends meet? The ICE has evolved across more than 100 years but greedy lawmakers and car manufacturers scared shitless on Tesla's growth on the stock market are now trying to push a paradigm shift in a fraction of the ICE's development time while the tech is simply not there.
@@MrPrajitura So? What seems to be the problem? Most propably the people living as discribed by yourself can’t afford a car anyhow.
@@jjZ41962Every time I see someone talk about how it works perfectly for them and then someone explains how it wouldn't work for them the original person replies that they're probably too poor for one anyways. Get a better argument. You can buy used Teslas for $25k now. They aren't the fancy luxury items you think they are.
@@hacob2004 Life is a bitch..
Totally agree with James, the real problem with EVs is the time it takes to recharge them rather than their range or lack of.
The lack of range gets in the way when once a year you want to make a longer journey or you occasionally want to tow a trailer. When you are well off and subscribe to the 15 minute city then EVs are perfect.
@@jackmorganfiftyfiveMmm... Not quite sure what you are saying there. My main point is wholly about the time it takes to recharge, EVs themselves I have no problem with apart from the weight of them :) I was sitting at a supermarket petrol station the otherday, it was busy and they had card payment on the pump so a pretty slick operation with fast turnaround of probably 4 mins a sale so one 'refuling station' was servicing 15 customers per hour as opposed to 2/3 per hour for EVs. I don't know the number of petrol stations/pumps that exist but whatever it is we need x5 or x7 the number of working chargers for EVs and that doesn't make economic sense.
But that’s only a problem on long road trips. Daily use you have a full battery every single time you leave your house.
@@TheCreamRisesToTheTop Yes if you have a drive and can plug it in every night but where we need EVs most is in the city where for perhaps over 50% of people don't have that luxury. No problem in the 'burbs' :)
@@johnhaynes9910 You are aware most ev's are charged at home overnight at very cheap rates.
The 'it's totally silent' thing is a bit silly when 90% of car noise is from tyres.
James being balanced and insightful is always a pleasure, and of course he is spot on. It is all about the batteries. They are, in no particular order:
Too expensive
Too bulky
Too heavy
Too temperature-sensitive
Too non-linear in their charging behaviour
(This list only considers the driving/owning experience, and not the issues around the environmental impact of mass-scale battery production and subsequent disposal.)
I’ve owned a Tesla Model S for 6 years now after several decades as a petrol head, and the benefits of electric motors over ICE are simply undeniable, the only real downside being the lack of any discernible ‘character’. During that time, there have been incremental steps to deal with the battery issues, but the big breakthrough remains elusive, despite periodic announcements that viable solid-state batteries are just around the corner.
A lightweight, fast-charging, temperature-insensitive, affordable BEV would be the ICE killer that the world needs. It will surely come, but meanwhile the net-zero carbon dream is not aligned with the available solutions.
The recharging issue remains though for people who live in urban areas and ahve to park on streets or live in flats. They wouldn't be able to charge at home and would therefore pay a higher price to charge their EVs.
Guy i work with has an electric Peugeot, he only lives two miles from work and has a charging point at home so works well for him, it's a 2020 (i think ?), recently the equivalent of the engine management light came on, said "charging system error", took it to the dealer, fault was some kind of charging module, bill for repair was £3000, and it was just out of warranty (or the warranty didn't cover the part/repair ?), he kicked off as the car had done less that 8000 miles, after a bit of arguing Peugeot agreed to repair it as "good will", apparently though it's becoming a common issue. As these cars are becoming a bit older the massive repair bills will start to come in.
And the bills will be Big, electronics are not cheap even for ICE Vehicles.
Two miles to work? I would walk or cycle! I draw the line taking the bus because nobody wants to be a bus wanker
2 miles from work? A bicycle would work for him!
@@peanuts2105 I would walk too TBH, to be fair he did have a bike crash years ago so i think he has bother with his leg. My point was though if he lived 40 miles from work and only had street parking the electric car probably wouldn't be practical.
That's what happens when you buy an EV, and a French one at that.
The biggest issue with EVs is charging them at home if you live in flats or a row of terraces and you have to park the car in the road. I nearly tripped over a cable that had been left across the path at night.
You don’t get it. These are not for poor people. They are for the elites. A way to control who gets to move around freely and who doesn’t.
Exactly. If that were me, the little charmers round my way would nick the cable and flog the copper.
Yes, terrace housing and flats without access fo an EV charger will become less valuable property in the future. Homes with charging (and solar) will have a much better resale potential.
I live in a flat and there are charging points right outside my window. It's a simple and relatively cheap technology so I don't see why it shouldn't become available everywhere.
You are the exception. I live on the edge of London... almost NONE of the newly built flats where I live even in a 10 mile radius have fast chargers outside of them.
Most building developers spend a fortune building the flats, they don't then go and plant 5 EV chargers outside at tremendous cost to them in the vain hope that anyone who can afford the price of the flat might also then have a spare £30k to waste on an electric car. @@Elgsdyr
Easy to see why this man was a successful car show host.
Great points by May.
I have carpooled in EVs several times and those were weird and inconvenient experiences. I love the nonchalance of petrol/diesel.
Hybrid EVs make sense though. As May says, electric drivetrain, with energy storage in petrol. Like most locomotives, diesel-electric.
James said his diesel Polo will easily 450 miles on a tank. I've hired a diesel Skoda Fabia which had a 1450 engine that was about 6/7 years old from a local firm that rents out older cars and that easily did roughly 650 miles on a tank. I've got a heavy right foot and the first time I hired one it covered 850+ miles in six days, around the West country, hardly any on a motorway and averaged 69 mpg! When my present lease is finished on my Skoda Kamiq 1.0, nice as it is, I'm going for an older diesel car.
I can get close to 1000 mile with my Volvo V60 diesel 2 litre.
@@foppo101 That is just too emotive. The children I see are all vaping like crazy so don't tell me my high mpg is damaging their lungs. The evidence for that is very weak indeed.
You do realize good mpg means lower emissions right...?@@foppo101
It doesn't matter. My tank is full every morning. For medium trips I supercharge less than 10 times a year and for very long trips I take the plane.
@@foppo101 Are these children who seem to be vaping themselves to an early grave?
Mr May forgets a little detail called poisoning others with his exhaust for a ounce of his perceived convenience during a journey. The society generally accepted these externalities as a price of progress when there was no other way. But now there is, and no one should bear the health and well-being consequences of others' decisions when there are better alternatives.
By the same logic, one could declare you guilty of enslaving African children to mine minerals for your ev, but I'm sure you're fine with that, because you've decided your own pet causes make you morally superior.
I could listen to james talk about anything for hours tbh ill watch the full episode :) he is so poignant, articulated and fascinated :)
Totally relate to this as a motor-loving EV owner. Amazing cars, not for everyone, not yet at least. Well said, Mr May.
In Switzerland they are putting chargers in village car parks and rest stops on freeways, not just fuel stations but the ones with just toilets so you are never more than a few kilometres from a charger.
It sounds as though Britain is wedded to the old fashioned fuel station model but chargers don’t need large underground tanks which need refilling, all you need is to be near a power line.
"It sounds as though Britain is wedded to the old fashioned fuel station model". No, it's not. Chargers are situated in a large variety of places.
I have watched this and several other videos about EV’s in Britain and they constantly moan about the difficulty of finding a charging station, having to go out of their way, broken chargers etc. and having to use an app of charging locations to plan their journey.
One guy made a big deal of driving from John O’Groats to Lands End in his EV.
@@glennet9613 that's because the people who just go to an EV charger and charge don't make videos
It sounds simple. All you need is to be near a power line? The electrical power grid is designed to deliver certain voltages to a particular area. Industrial areas tend to have large substations situated nearby, so they can deliver high voltages to site, to be transformed, to say, 440v 3-phase. Village car parks and the like don't have the need to draw that much power, so infrastructure was installed to suit. So, to provide a few high speed chargers, say at 200-350kwh means infrastructure must first be upgraded, from the charger, all the way back to at least the nearest substation, which itself may need upgrades.
I live in rural Switzerland and I notice that a couple of chargers have been installed in the car parks in most villages, including ours. I don’t believe two chargers in even a small village will be putting a significant extra load on the village supply.
When I drive along the freeway most of the parking area signs, every forty km or so show that there are chargers, usually four, and if I stop for a pee they are usually empty.
Great commentary by James May as usual. The state of battery technology in combination with charging infrastructure is most people's gripe with EVs. On the other hand it should be pointed out how insanely fast it's been developing in the last 10 years. Remember that we've pushed combustion engines and their infrastructure to perfection for over a century. So while I agree with James at this specific point in time, I think that in decade or so we might be looking back at these discussions with amusement.
A very thoughtful and intelligent on EVs. It's pretty clear to me that we are still in the early stages of EV/battery development. While many of the current limitations surrounding EVs (range, reliable/available charging & EV cost) are indisputable the conversation 10 years from now will look very different. Twenty years of EV know-how can't possibly compare to 100 years of ICE development. Over the years I've switched from gas powered outdoor equipment (blowers, chain saws, trimmers & snowblowers) and from corded to cordless electric powered tools. I see the same migration with cars. I believe someday EV/battery technology will progress to the point that EV batteries will be the size of a airline carry-on and 1-3 of these will power an EV. Charging will be accomplished either by swapping out used batteries for fresh ones or be rechargeable if so desired. I may not be around to see this come to fruition but I'm sure EV not ICE will be the technology of the future - government mandate or not.
To my understanding most people want a much larger range than they will likely use. Same as having a watch rated to 5000m so you can wear it in the bath. That is where as James says smaller lighter evs with faster charging maybe a good answer for many people. A good example of that is older people who just drive to the shops twice a week.
In the Netherlands the power grid can't handle people charging their cars when they come home from work at the end of the day 😅
That what I said once there's to many people charging overnight ,it won't be off peak anymore ,ipso facto it's gonna get expensive.
This is a silly concern - one of the (many) reasons EVs are great is because we don't need to charge them immediately upon arriving home. Dynamic charging will have huge benefits for the energy system - spreading demand over the evening, soaking up power when it's cheap and dynamically responding to grid dynamics as required.
@@Deanonroof Please, have you not spent any time around other humans? of course we don't need to charge them immediately upon arriving home, but that is exactly what they will do, with an expectation that it starts charging.
I bet the Dutch power grid is far superior to our worn out antiquated shit grid in the U.S. we could have a brand new grid years ago, but we wasted our $$$ on useless wars. Iraq and Afghanistan would have paid for it easily
The grid can't handle it because power companies have been scalping the grid and the people for decades now.
Isn't privatization just swell?
I love James May "down to earth" opinions, he's so RIGHT ......
👏👏👏
Hello from Romania !!!
We could all still drive petrol/lpg powered vehicles as long as fossil fuels were eliminated from every other area of life. Transport only generates a quarter of greenhouse gas emissions.
We have a Tesla Model Y and a Toyota CHR Petrol, we always take the Model Y on long trips, not the CHR. The only time we have waited around for charging to finish was on an 1,100 mile trip and this totaled around 25 minutes when we weren't otherwise occupied. At the same time we never have to go to a charging station when at home as we have a charger on the driveway so we have probably wasted less time mile for mile charging and waiting around vs going to petrol stations. There is also the added benefit of just watching some Netflix on the car screen if you get bored.
I really don't see charging as being an issue, yes when the entire fleet is electric we will need a lot more chargers, the expansion is already underway. The bigger issue is people having electric cars with no driveway to charge on, I would never suggest anyone to get one without a driveway.
My issues with the Model Y are limited to: wiper rain detection is terrible (I have to switch speed manually) and no parking sensors with dangerous visualisations when reversing. Everything else is amazing, best car I've ever owned, no regrets.
2:00 This is assuming no technological progress is made on charging. And this will probably happen as it already is, happening. But James has a fair point and it will probably take a while (understatement) before we get to a complete charge in 3 minutes.
But what James forgets is that we are seeing a paradigm shift in when we provide our cars with energy. What I mean is, we're now slowly having more and more chargers at home, work, parking spots, etc. Basically anywhere where you will park a car. So if you charge your car regularly a bit, you don't need those 30 minute charging sessions. This obviously does not work on big trips, but those few big trips should not be an argument against EVs.
You forget one thing. You go to petrol stations all the time. You charge mostly at home. So you go to charge when you need to go more than 250 -300 miles. How often do you do that? Most people 3-4 times a year. The problem is not there for home chargers. So what we need is home chargers for those who live in apartment buildings.
Yep, for anyone who has owned an electric car this is such an obvious counterpoint. It’s amazing more people don’t appreciate it. We do over 100 miles/day on our model 3 including all winter long. Almost all charging is done in the garage.
Being able to charge at home is wonderful - no more time wasting trips to the petrol/gas station, no more petrol or diesel dribbled down the side of the car, or on my hands... A relative lives in an apartment and he has been able to install a charger in the underground car park. Still I appreciate that not every one who lives in an apartment can do this.
Given that many jurisdictions are restricting or banning EVs from apartment parking facilities, due to the fire risk posed by lithium ion batteries, this will probably not be feasible
Recharging anxiety is a great concept, it really shifts the focus in infrastructure vs battery tech.
It's rear and refreshing to actually hear someone speak with intelligence on the internet. Thank you Sir
This sort of balanced, well reasoned discussion about BEVs makes me sick. I much prefer we just all pick a side and then selectively choose anecdotes and data to support our cause and stick to it at all costs.
Exactly. And the fact is the data does not look good on EV's. Indeed it looks absolutely terrible no matter how hard people try to justify EV's
@@brunorivademar5356 Right on brother! You've obviously already picked a side and are going to stick to it. Now, tell us what data you're going to selectively choose in order to prove your point!
We barely scrape through most winters on our powergrid , there's no way the extra transmission infrastructure and electricity generation will be in place for 20 to 30 million EV cars! In a 100 years let alone 10 to 15 years time.
Are you talking about the UK? Look at the information that comes from the people who run the national grid in terms of generation. Don't make assumptions without checking some real numbers. Actually generation, though challenging, is the somewhat easier part. The bigger challenge is localised infrastructure. It would be helped by a pro-active government but don't hold your breath on that one. Ironically it is often red tape rather than costs which is holding things up.
I own a Honda Accord hybrid which utilizes gasoline and a battery in a seamless manner. Close to 50 mph in a full size sedan with ample power. This is the way to go
My thoughts exactly on range.
If we had cheap small cars with a small battery BUT they could be fast charged coupled with better charging facilities it would be almost as now with fuel pumps.
Putting just a few chargers on motorway services is not enough it needs a charger on EVERY parking space and it wouldn't matter if an ice car parked on it as it would just be a space as now.
This is especially important during this so called transition stage.
There is no actual ban on petrol cars it's the emissions. It's very possible that an alternative fuel might be found.
My other thoughts are that instead of an arbtrary cut off date the modern hybrids can run on battery alone for quite a few miles so if hybrids continued and more ULEZ restrictions came in a hybrid could switch off the engine in those zones but would be able to still have a very good range with the ice engine and take away that range anxiety and possibly do away with the need for chargers everywhere if it also charged the traction battery in engine mode.
After all it's usually the cities where the pollution gathers. BMW had the right idea with the i3.
I cannot speak for the UK or the US, but in France and all adjacent countries I have been driving very long distances (more than 1000 km) since 2018 with my model 3 without any inconvenience. A 15 or 20 minutes charge after more than 2 hours of high speed driving is just a 15 to 20 minutes welcomed break. And 95% of my charges are at home, so no waiting. So sure we need more home charging and more fast charging, but it is not a challenge at all compared to the benefits especially the reduction in CO2. Fighting climate change will be *far more difficult* in other domains, ground transportation is definitely the easy part of the job since we have alternatives. Finally, the end of ICE does not mean all ICE vehicles will be replaced by EVs. In cities, public transportation, bicycles, or even just walking are far better solutions. And between cities trains are just perfect. So from now to 2035 (probable ICE ban) and 2050 (net zero goal to meet the Paris agreement) we need more charge points (from 3 kW to 300 kW) but also more public transportation, more bike lanes, more walkable cities, more proximity shops and services, etc. Cars will be part of the equation, perfect for low density places, and they will all be electric with batteries, just because there is no zero emission alternative.
All good points except for the reduction of CO2
@@zakr1187 You don't think using EVs reduce CO2 emission or you don't think our children need a livable continent ? Just as a reminder, the Paris agreement to keep global warming under 1,5 degrees already implies a local warming of 4 degrees in Europe. And we will very probably fail to reach the Paris agreement, so now the best scenario is probably +2 globally and +6 in Europe. Rich people will adapt, normal people will endure, but vegetation and most animals will just die, so just bad news for our children.
I would argue that they are useful at cleaning up the air in cities (if widely adopted, which isn't a viability at the moment, or in the foreseeable future), but will do nothing for "climate change" and potentially could be worse overall.
Cleaning up city air is a desirable goal, but in my opinion CO2 emissions don't represent the most dire environmental issues at hand.
I think that has to be the problems our oceans face, plastics and the sheer amounts of toxic chemicals that have permeated basically every ecosystem there is. Altering them, potentially irreparably.
I think CO2 is a distraction from tackling the real issues at hand and giving ill informed rich people a source of righteous indignation to virtue signal on.
Just a personal opinion
Not saying emissions aren't a massive problem, just that they're not even in the top ten most pressing environmental emergencies we face.
The science is also dodgy as all hell, I'm pretty scientifically illiterate (compared to the pros) and even I can see it's being leveraged for underhanded agendas.
I'm not anti EV, just being realistic here.
@@didierpuzenat7280 The Paris agreement is a farce... It's dogmatic and places the responsibility in the wrong hands
I want to see a future for my children too, but the way we're going about it is almost certainly making things worse.
Plus, as I said above, I just don't believe CO2 is the biggest challenge at hand. The climate science doesn't stand up to scrutiny and neither do EVs even if the reduction of emissions is the goal.
We should be doing everything in our power to reduce pollution, but we're going backwards and looking in the wrong places. I think
@@C.Fecteau-AU-MJ13 No, there is absolutely *NO DOUBT* that the CO2 produced my humans is causing global warming. We are in 2024, the science is clear on that. But you can believe want you want, Earth is flat, God had created Earth 6000 years ago, etc. It does not matter because people in charge are educated and ICE vehicles will be banned, even if corruption from some automakers postpones the ban of a few years to maximize immediate benefits at the expense of your children.
4:40 - I cannot fill up my gas tank at home though... Unless I have a barrel...
A liquid is not a gas mate
Why can't you fill up at home? Someone can bring you a 5 gallon fuel jug and you can pour it into the tank. Or you could fill one up and leave it in your garage for emergencies.
How about those of us who don't have a garage or a drive way to plug our cars into where we live?
I always keep a gas tank just in case at home. It's the smart thing to do.
Would not want to do that again its a mess
But that’s a different point. The issue is range limiting the potential of the car. If you want to travel 500 miles how do you overcome the need to recharge? You can’t.
You have to objectively compare cars irrespective of what power them along. In many ways EVs are inferior due to the reasons James lists.
Great commentary. In my opinion, an electric car only makes sense is if your a homeowner with a garage and have a fast charger wired in so you can charge anytime your at home and your daily driving habits are within 50% the range of your car.
I wonder how many people saying this actually used an EV on toad trips. We have a diesel Mercedes and a Tesla model 3. I take the Tesla for road-trips whenever I can. I’ve been to Paris, Prag, regularly between Hamburg and Munich. 0 problems
My friend has a model s 2016. And they have many times been stressed on it having low battery. If you forget to plug it in at nigh it can really cause an issue. The closest super charger is 40 to an hour from their house depending on traffic.
Teslas are for well off people who own their own home, have solar on the roof and a charger in their garage. When you don't have all that, you're too poor and you can forget about Teslas.
@@jackmorganfiftyfive oh they have a house, but the 220 volt chargers aren’t as fast as the super chargers. So if you forget to plug in your car at night you could be screwed.
I like the idea of electric cars. It will take some getting used to. I don't like government forcing transition numbers and dates on industry and society. The transition from horse to gasoline automobiles involved finding the way amongst diesel, steam and electric. It involved the development of technology and harvesting resources like steel, lumber, oil, and rubber. Very little of that was done by government dictates. It was driven by people saying "We want this", AND business saying "This is what we can do." Furthermore it all took decades to develop.
Ever heard of climate warming ? Anyway, no government is "forcing" you to buy an EV. But sure, buying a *new* ICE car will probably be banned in 2035, because a car in on the road for at least 15 years and we need net zero by 2050.
Batteries are an inherently unstable resource though. Unstable as in, the materials used to create them come from appallingly exploited workers in Africa, and as in they are fantastically unreliable in cold climates like the one I am used to. Good luck getting half the official range of a Tesla where I'm from
Yup, best would be if governments just stopped forcing anyone and just let you choose for yourself.
@@TheLastCrusader22 That is rubbish, LFP batteries which are used by Tesla in their RWD models, BYD in all models, and increasingly by other manufacturers use no cobalt. Australia is the biggest supplier of Lithium, Africa doesn't feature in Lithium, Copper, Nickel or Phosphate production which makes up the main ingredients. Not sure how cold it is where you come from but Bjorn Nyland does comprehensive range testing in Norway at highway speeds, the Model 3 was recently tested at around -4 degrees and he got around 72% of range under open road driving, the least efficient type. He advised in summer this would go from 440km to 600km range.
@@100xasd Are governments forcing anyone?
That's a good summary, the technology just isn't quite there yet, and the issue is that nobody is really making a step forward to change it. But what boggles my mind the most is that the electricity you need to charge these cars is often produced by coal, gas, etc. so there's absolutely no environmental benefit at all. When we take a look at hybrids though, they are the machines that at least limit the pollution, and to me that's the future for now.
People have to remember that this year, for the first time since the invention of the modern 400+ km EV you can actually buy a used car for reasonably less than the cost of a new car and nothing is constricted by availability. Many car buyers never buy new cars. This is the first time we've had the EV car market close to balanced, so they can now work for most people.
Still have to look at where the the battery material comes from. There is no where " clean"
EV's don't eliminate pollution, they just push it down the line.
lol What's this false premise that EVs are about reducing all types of pollution? What a silly gotcha notion. 😂
That's not why they're being mandated by a date certain. They're being mandated to reduce specific kinds of pollution, the greenhouse gas emissions that ice vehicles produce, which contributes significantly to climate change.
The pollution that remains, the emissions from mining, and pollution that is produced to mine the minerals, and any pollution produced in the manufacturing of the batteries etc is localized and more easily managed. While ice vehicles are emitting and leaking different types of pollution everywhere they go by the time they're old enough to be scrapped. Every parking lot you pull into, every single space is stained with oil. oil runoff from rainwater and irrigation pollutes everywhere. Where as the pollution that electric vehicles produce is in the mining and manufacturing of it, and recycling of it at the end of its life. During the life of the vehicle it's a much cleaner vehicle, it doesn't directly emit greenhouse gas emissions, all types of electrical generation produce far less greenhouse gas emissions, it doesn't leak oil all over the place, they don't require millions of oil changes annually and all that waste oil to be recycled and dealt with and it's pollution and leakage and spillage, and they don't require hundreds of thousands of gas stations across the nation with tanks in the ground that are all leaking and polluting etc.
They may not be a clean vehicle there certainly a hell of a lot cleaner than what's on the road today. The pollution being highly concentrated in specific moments in their life cycle, mining, manufacturing, recycling, where it's localized and can be contained.
Unlike ice vehicles that just shit all over the environment everywhere they go for their entire life cycle. Like my 22-year-old Honda does.
@@ButterfatFarms 2 points. 80% of evs are powered by coal. Plus the methane released from mining coal. Also they have just said that tyre wear is far more dangerous than CO2. ICE is cleaner than EV and that is a fact you can't get away from.
@@ButterfatFarms It doesn't matter if CO2 emissions are localized. It all end up as greenhouse gas that theoretically impacts the entire planet.
Also, it's not much cleaner. A typical 80 kWh produces as much as 16,000 metric tons of CO2. 16,000 metric tons is the equivalent of driving a 4 cylinder car 6 years. 6 years is already the majority of an EV batteries expected life. That doesn't even include end of life emissions or the emissions from charging. That doesn't even include the rest of the car, it's just the battery.
@@thehairygolfer lol get real, in the United States the single largest source of electricity production is clean burning natural gas that we have such an overabundance of its priced as a waste product. Unlike the rest of the world. Thus resulting in cheap electricity too. The breakdown on electric production in the United States is 39.8% Natural Gas, 19.5% Coal, 18.2 Nuclear, 21.5% Renewables (total), 6.9% of Renewables being hydroelectric, the other 15.3% non-hydro sources like solar and wind. While 0.9% of electricity is produced from petroleum or other sources. Of the coal fired power plants in the United States 88% of them were built between 1950 and 1990 with far fewer since and it's unlikely that any new coal power plants will ever come online in the United states. Instead we're adding natural gas capacity, solar, and wind.
Meaning the current 19.5% of capacity that is coal today will do nothing but conrinue to dwindle as those plants go off online. Their capacity replaced with more natural gas power plants, solar and wind installations. Perhaps some nuclear not likely Hydro as its time has sort of passed considering the vast alterations that are required to natural landscapes and rivers to make it happen at any scale.