Vedic 'Brahman' Vs 'God' & 'Allah'-God Of Consciousness Vs God(s) Of Intellect| Sanjay Dixit | Tanya
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 03. 2021
- Anthropomorphic, vengeful & fearful sky-dwelling male 'Allah' of Islam & 'God' of Christianity have a single agenda of dividing the world into 'Believers'/'Non-Believers' & reward/punish them respectively. However, the Vedic 'Brahman' meaning 'that which grows' is the creator & maintainer, infinite, eternal, genderless, transcendent, omniscient, omnipresent Absolute/Supreme Consciousness, formless(Nirgun) & with form(Sargun) & is inseparable from the 'Atman' in every creation, thus non-dual. All this & more in this talk.
About the Speaker:
Sanjay Dixit is an IAS (Retd.), ex-Prez of Rajasthan Cricket Association & Marine Engineering graduate who introduced a revolutionary technology for large-scale date-palm production in Rajasthan & is the author of several best-selling books. Prolific columnist on Indian culture, history & philosophy & Chairman of ‘The Jaipur Dialogues’ (India-centric think-tank), he also hosts a CZcams series by the same name.
1) Sanjay Dixit ji's and C.K. Raju ji's article link: / all-religions-are-not-...
2) Subhash Kak ji's article link: / the-secret-of-the-veda
3) Jaipur dialogues 3 part series on 'All religions are not the same' by Sanjay Dixit ji:
• All Religions Are Not ...
• All Religions Are Not ...
• Part 3 | All Religions...
4) 'Understanding Muhammad' book by Ali Sina - archive.org/details/Understan...
5) 'Calcutta Quran Petition' Talk on Sangam Talks - • The Calcutta Quran Pet...
6) Jaipur Dialogues on Ex-Muslims and Atheists on CZcams: • Ex-Muslim Atheists - A...
Interviewer:
Tanya
Follow on Twitter: / tanyabrahmvadni
Sub-Topics:
2:38 The first war between Sanatanis/Monists and Monotheists in the RgVed 'The Ten Kings War'
5:50 Abrahamic Gods are 'Niraakaar' or formless but not 'Nirgun'. They are full of attributes.
6:14 The Sanatan 'Eeshwar'
8:00 'Nirgun' and 'Sargun'
9:46 Concept of 'Brahmn' Vs Abrahamic 'Gods'
17:35 Concept of fear of 'God' and 'Allah' in Abrahamic religions not present in Sanatan Dharma
22:52 Dharmic traditions are scientific
32:55 Counter to Christian conversion tactics of Advaita philosophy and Bible is one
39:50 Question and Answer session
Subscribe to our CZcams channels:
CZcams English: / sangamtalks
CZcams Hindi: / sangamhindi
Follow Sangam Talk on social media :
Telegram : t.me/sangamtalks
Twitter: / sangamtalks
Facebook: / sangamtalks
Instagram: / sangamtalks
Website: www.sangamtalks.org
Donate: www.sangamtalks.org/donate
I am an Ex Christian from India, who discovered the beauty of Advita and meditation 50 years back, via my Guru Osho.
All 3 Abrahamic religions are kindergarten stuff.
Advita leads you from ignorance to bliss.
Unfortunately most of my Hindu friends have confined themselves to rituals, and have forgotten to discover what lies within.
Jai Guru Deva.🕉️
Which state you belongs to bro
Early Christianity was almost identical to the concept of "Hinduism", encapsulating these sorts of philosophies and teachings. The greeks referred to this as Gnosticism. However, the Christian Church persecuted, tortured and killed many gnostics. However, we can still access a lot of their writings.
But, I agree. I also think that judgement comes in many shapes and forms. One who looks downward on Abrahamic faith will judge those who follow it. We cannot escape the dichotomy without becoming truly agnostic.
I hope that you will advance further and let go of these teachings for the final eternal teaching: that all subscriptions and preferences come from the Ego, and to kill the Ego is to obtain true bliss and freedom.
I totally agree
DaasRajnya war czcams.com/video/Xexi6JiRepk/video.html 👈👈
Kaliyuga czcams.com/video/A51VO_X0qh4/video.html 👈
Shiva temples are usually situated in isolated places away from society and people as Shiva is thought to be gyan vairagya embodied.
If Mecca was not existing prior to 700ad but had one isolated temple it would in all probability would be a Shiva abode.
Mecca is a pre-Islamic pagan temple. Local Moon god was the primary deity.
This is important for our MacSikhs who have cut their roots and gotten confused about one god of Vedanta Kaivalya onlyness and that of the Middle East.
Its a must needed discourse for many hindus who don't even understand the essence and core of sanatana dharma , out of gross ignorance ,western education and poor research in own scriptures, thereby make a common blunder of equating God with that of Brahman(paramatma /parabrahma/nirguna brahman) ....Brahman is sath chit aananda ,sathyam gnanam anantham , akhandam,akhiladhaaram, nirvikalpa ,nirguna , adweetheyam ,swayam prakasham ,paranjyothi , nithyam ,sashwatham ,sakshi ....impersonal ,both transcendent and immanent ,ultimate reality ,beyond words /mind/ comprehension/ senses ,true SELF ...brahman is absolute truth ,illumines all that exists, one without a second, (ekam yeva adveetheyam brahman) non -dual , only reality , pure consciousness, pure SUBJECT ,pure existence, pure knowledge ,infinite , without any division/qualities ,unchanging ,not subject to time,space, causation, no doership ,not an experiencer , not subject to maya..many upanishads/vedanta ,vedas and mahavakyas extoll the principle of brahman which is source and destination of vedas ...the same brahman (nirguna) appear as ishwara (saguna brahman viz shiva/vishnu / mother goddess) who wield maya and avidya (ignorance) and through which the creation has come into play which is governed by rules of karma ..seeing creation and its creator ishwara as separate is a lower truth born out of ignorance and due to being subjected to maya...once u transcend maya or ignorance, wat remains is brahman which is our true nature (knowledge of SELF) and this is wat is called moksha or mukthi...GOD is very different concept where it is more a personality and who is seen as creator ,,but Brahman is beyond God and Godless , beyond creator and creation and is the only reality which appears(due to ignorance) with many forms, names ,transactions, relationships pluralities ,dualities or God or creation....one more difference of God of abrahamics is that he is distinct, separate from creation but in sanatana dharma except for small shades of dwaita dharshana, ishwara is all pervasive , all knowledge and dwells in creation and beyond and not separate from creation..MAHAVAKYAS ..Sarvam khalvidam brahman...all is indeed brahman ,,aham brahmasmi..I m brahman (true nature) , tat twam asi (you are that brahman) ayam atma brahman( this self is indeed brahman) ,pragnanam brahman( consciousness/chaitanyam is brahman) ...""Brahman "" should not be confused with brahmin( a varna) and brahma( chaturmukha brahma /one of the trinities)..also ishwara and brahman are non-different (abhedam ),hence Lord shiva though worshipped as various forms but in highest essence "Shiva" is described as advaitha brahman,, same with mother goddess or VIshnu ,,hope it helps your understanding, hari om tat sat 🕉.. Regarding link between creation and brahman/ishwara as per advaita ,,brahman is material ,final ,efficient cause of universe and brahman is abhinna nimitta upadana karanam..
Brahman is the ,,Holy Spirit,,residing in every Jivatma awaken or in sleep...that is the ,,Bhakti Latta,,that carries Sanatandharma Knowledge.. Brahman is all prevaiding Conciesness.,,Aham Brahmasmi..Tat tvam Asi..,, i am a Spirit Soul that also are You! but never forget:Ishwara Parama Krsna,SatCid Ananda Vigraha,Anadir Adir Govinda,Sarva Karana Karanam! ,,Brahma Samhita,,
@@danielpetrovski6662 this holy spirit , soul of christian theology has a different connotation altogether and can even distort meaning of brahman grossly..better the non -transalatables of sanskrit words be understood in its own context , worldview...brahman ,atman , ishwara ,jivatma ,paramatma ,sacchinanada etc all are such non-translatables ...brahman can't be said its residing inside or outside bcoz it alone exists (pure existence sath) and there is no other thing that exists apart from it (non_dual , non-separate), so the question of inside or outside doesnt arise and it will only arise in ignorance, hari om 🕉
The Sanskrit Non-Translatables list is brilliant. Thanks!
@@danielpetrovski6662 ... First of all soul a concept does not exist in the Indian context of spirituality we have the five sheets of the human system the pancha kosha ... Which comprises of the the human system and the difference between holy spirit and the Brahmin if something which would not be even talked about because it is very ludicrous that our Christian mind interprets everything through the lens of Christianity and even use parallels this that everything to forward the narrative the holy Spirit has nothing to do with Brahman.......because the context that everyone has Brahmin within than is absolutely Ludacris gramin is behind everything that is within and without it does not play by the rules of duality Discovery present omniscient but not in the context of the Ibrahim thought it is omnipresent a nomination because it cannot be looked upon by account test which sees itself as a presence because the presence is within the universe this is the underlying factor behind the universe it is that which always escapes you you cannot really conceive and tell what is Brahman here only 10 what it is not it is not the mind it is not the body it's not The subtle body which you can interpreter soul because that is the only vocabulary that is available to you but it is not it is not god as an entity it is notyou cannot have a dialogue with Brahman because Brahman cannot talk there is no concept of talking to bhraman because there is not a concept of 'to' in the first place.....bramh....is that universal consciousness which has nothing to do with the divisibility altogether.... It is that consciousness which develops the rules of the universe known as Yama and niyama..... It injects the context of karma it is that which is ever United with the Shakti.. .. and Brahman is looked into different context the saguna Brahman and the nirguna Brahman the nirguna Brahman cannot be money created by any dualist DT worshipping system of the Indian thought the vaishnav see Brahman as saguna only,the non dualist are only interested in the nirguna and Kashmir shaivism accepts both.....so don't mention two three Indian scriptures here and drop false equivalences and try to prove any similarity of Christianity with the Indian thought there is none...... Brahmin is not a god that can talk to human brains Brahman is not a god which can write something which can be comprehended by the human brain..... Because of the fact that our levels of understanding are in four different levels no Christian in the world is beyond the two levels of vaikari and madhyam vak, the understanding of the spoken word and subtle thoughts, and only Yogi is of the highest dimension has access to the other two levels of perception and understanding one is prashyanti, one is para vak...... And even normal Hindus do not have by definition access to the last two because for that sadhana is required...... So nirguna Brahman cannot be equated with a God who writes a book and tell this is the final word.. because the nature of Shakti of the Brahman is ever creative ever progressive ever evolutionary and cyclical and if you know a cycle moves at each point in the cycle has a different direction than the previous of the next point So you cannot draw any two valances with it....... There is a context why Shri ram and shri Krishna vasudeva are different in thier Leela...... And it is also advocated that even that those specific forms come to earth in repetition......the biggest fallacy that one can make is they can select the the holy ghost which is neither Christ not God according to their grammer context and post it as Brahmin because Brahman cannot be divided Brahman does not mean that it is within you or you are within it it is behind within without and conceptualization all together so you cannot talk about it you can only talk about what it is not but never what it is that is why the philosophy of neti neti comes into place...... Alan Wattsspoke about the difference between the abrahamic God and Brahmin in meticulous details that too even decades ago......now you think that you can't rebel eyes and please things out of context and get away it is not going to happen you can do that with people who do not know their tradition but you can never do with Hindu who tradition as you cannot do that with the Buddhist.......
@@DattaMusics im sorry ,i have created a monster in your concept neti-neti ,sankhya,smarta philosophy..
Dixitji is so patient with this Ravi, certainly commendable!
ಎನ್
This is the dharmic culture of vivad where there's complete exchanges of ideas which criticize mutually acceptable universal ideas
This topic is very intriguing and interesting.
I will love to watch it.
This is phenomenonal lecture -- thank you. 🙏
czcams.com/video/Cuc04Og5UAo/video.html
Excellent. Please do repeat telecast of the entire content in JD also.
संजय दिक्षितजी,
आपका कहना बहुत सही है की, सनातनीयों को हिंदू फिलॅासॅाफी समझाने की आवश्यकता है और साथ मे ही इब्राहिमीक धर्मो का भी तुलनात्मक अध्ययन बचपन से विविध स्तर पर कराना जरूरी है।
Excellent talk! Rudrashtakam beautifully explained.
Sanjay ji is very logical and true in answering ........
I'm also having a similar dp lmao
I am looking forward to this talk, thank you.
I have problems with 'abrahamic' 'gods' - for they are personalised, judgemental, punish, and sanction killing, and then reward discriminately in return for worship and sacrifices, in a very low-level of control.
But the 'Creator' (Brahman?) has no opinion other than to give life, enlightenment through evolution, and something we define as 'love', because that is without any favour or prejudice.
A lack of 'love' and 'life' and 'light' manifests as hateful and heartless cruelty, which we define as 'evil'.
In other words, the Divine Creator is evolution of Life itself, on all levels of creation and, in the human experience, the becoming 'conscious' of all this, or en-Lightened, to find a Higher Peaceful Love in the Soul.
The God of the Bible is the creator, infinite Spirit, Life Himself, who created man in His image by breathing His Spirit into man to make Him a living soul. It’s His Spirit dwelling in our spirit that gives one eternal life. But when man chose to walk away from God, His Spirit severed from us and mortality ensued. Man tries to survive from the life from plants and animals and even goes to manipulate his breathe to extend his life by a few years. He thinks he can exit mortality and merge with the divine /immortality by his good works. Unfortunately civilizations have taught us that it doesn’t work, as it needs life to destroy death . Jesus Life Himself came to destroy our death and breathe His Spirit into us to return us to immortality
I only disagree in as much Brahman /permatma is not creator, it is only cause of creation.
@Devvrat Mishra Abrahamic religions are religio= glued meaning thereby followers of some man. i.e. They are Cults/ Panths only, not Dharma. As we see that all panthis are very adament to their views. These Panths i.e Cults grew somehow, out of proportion (see historical evidences mainly political) and since then are misleading the world. We must enlghten the world i.e. idealogy of 'Live and let live' is the real expression of ever expanding Brahma. This is Sanatan eternal concept and hence only Santana concept qualify to be defined as Dharma. Then only Peace will last long.
@@dewendrapratapsingh2803 I understand
In abrahamics,God is a personality and a creator who is distinct from creation..while in sanatana dharma , the ultimate reality(paramarthika satta) ,absolute truth i.e brahman/paramatma /nirguna brahman is impersonal (not a personality ) ,sath chit aananda and without qualities , beyond attributes , yet is the ground of all that exists ...the same brahman appear as ishwara (saguna brahman - vishnu/shiva/mother goddess) as long as we experience jagath (universe) as reality ...this stage of reality is called vyavaharika satta(transactional reality) where ishwara is sarvagna(all knowledge), sarveshwara, sarvashakthimaan, sarva vyapakam ( all pervading) and through maya (mayashakthi) creates,sustains ,control and destroy the jagath (universe) endlessly with rules of karma ...Ishwara is different from God bcoz ishwara is both principle and personality,,,also ishwara is non-different from jagath as ishwara is in and through and beyond jagath.."brahma sathyam jagath mithya jivo brahmaiva naparah" !! Brahman is only reality and this universe is an apparent reality ,there is no difference between individual self and universal self ...essence of advaita vedanta..as long as we experience universe we are been subjected to maya /avidya /ignorance thats why we feel limited, mortal , suffering , less knowledge etc and undergo cycle of birth , rebirth through principle of karma till we transcend maya /avidya through atma vidya (knowledge of true SELF) by grace of ishwara who wields mayashakthi and this is called moksha /mukthi/nirvana/kaivalya and no more limitedness, suffering, birth rebirth occurs and ur true nature of brahman is discovered..MAHAVAKYAS viz.aham brahmasmi ,tat twam asi ,ayam atma brahman, pragnanam brahma mean the same essence..hari om 🕉
Yaay ! Mr Sanjay Dixit sir and such an enlightening topic 🙏 simply wow ...🔥
मनुस्मृती ये वाह्याद गंदी कीताब है ..जी में मानव जातीको डिवाईड कीया है...
सब मानव एक है >>फिर ये बकवास ब्राह्मन क्षत्रीय वैश्य शुद्र >> गलत है...
*भगवान पोथी पुराण ब्राह्मणोके दिमाग की उपज है*
खुदका पेट भरनेके लिये सब पुराणोकी उत्पत्ती की, अंधविश्वास बढाया लोगो मे so-called Man made God's भगवान के बारेमे..पुजा पाठ होमहवन शांती पाठ सत्यनारायण करो और दक्षिणा दो....साले ये हरामी मादरचो आदमी मरनेके बाद भी नहीं छोडते: पिंडदान करो श्राद करो *लेकीन इन भडवोको दक्षिणा दो*
नालायक मनुको इन ब्राह्मणोने पैदा किया ४ वर्ण बनाये और खुद को श्रेष्ठ बताया. भगवतगीता भी इन कपटी ब्राह्मणोने लीखी(अध्याय ४ श्लोक १३ पढो, ४ वर्ण बताये हैं:सब गलत).
हिंदू वोके १००% दुष्मन ये ब्राह्मण ही है.
अत्याचार सदीयोसे ये पाखंडी ब्राह्मण लोगो पर कर रहे है,, महाभारत में एकलव्य का अंगुठा ब्राह्मण द्रोणाचार्य ने ही कटवाया था > ता की आदिवासी एकलव्य १नंबर धनुर्धर ना बने..
भारत में आरक्षण इन पापी ब्राह्मणोकी देन है, जुल्म कीये , छुवाछुत की, उच नीच भेदभाव कीया, मंदिरोमे आने नहीं दीया,....
@@Timakiwala पहली बात : यहां ब्राह्मण की नहीं ब्रह्म की बातें किया गया है।
और दुसरी : मनु को नालायक कहने से पहले कम से कम एकबार मनुस्मृति पड़ा होता ⁉
विनम्रतापूर्वक कहना चाहुँगा, बिना पड़े आधा अधुरा ज्ञान के भरोसे मन्तव्य न किया करें।
@@Timakiwala ये शादी, संतान, जीवन, मरण के कर्मकांड, दान, दक्षिणा, यह सब तो हर ही मजहब में होता है बल्कि हिंदुओं से ज्यादा होता है, फिर केवल ब्राह्मणों को काहे कोस रहे हो? क्या कोई मुल्ला या पादरी किसी मुर्दे को बिना जमीन का पैसा खाये अपने कब्रिस्तान में गड़ने देगा?? हर पण्डित यजमान की हैसियत देखकर ही दक्षिणा मांगता है, कोई छुरा दिखाकर तो नहीं वसूलता है जकात के 2.5% की तरह। और चर्च को जो कर देना पड़ता है उसका क्या?? अब तुम बोलो कि श्मशान का पंडा कुछ भी न ले तो भाई वह भी इंसान है दिन भर मुफ्त में ही काम करेगा तो खायेगा क्या? कभी ऐसे भी सोच लिया करो।
Let's support all the Sanatani youbtubers
Yes
🙏🕉️ कृपया "मंदीर" और "temple" में क्या अंतर है वह भी बताएं।🕉️🙏
Just English pronounce
@@abhayprasad9580 That's a general understanding by most. But I am not asking for it. 🙏
Temple is a 'place of worship' in general, WHEREAS Mandir is the 'place of residence' of diety as well as 'place of worship' of that diety.
@@abhayprasad9580 incorrect. All Mandirs are Temples, but all Temples are not Mandirs.
@@vikramrazdan5680 🕉️ धन्यवाद। मतलब जहां देव या देवी स्थापित हो उसे कोई भी भाषा में "मंदिर" ही संबोधित करना चाहिए।🕉️🙏
Wonderful explanations by Sanjai Dixit Ji. 🔥👍🙏✌️
Beautiful topic for discussion
🙏🕉️ Thank you. I believe each word especially Sanskrut word has meaning. If we try to follow Sanatan Dharm then we have to use words in right way with right meaning. Which will help us to regain strength in our belief of Sanatan Dharm.🕉️🙏
Sanjay jee, of all topics and videos, this was the one which gave ans to many questions that I always had. Dhanyawaad
Dear all
Please try to contact Dr Gururaj Karjagi.
He knows Advaita and Dwita both very well. He is one of the best available in India.
People will get know.
Please please please 🙏 try.
Yes my family knows him personally 🙏🏼
37:40 enlightened beings are awake in sleep. They do not sleep. They feel absolute freedom but have no desire to fulfil.
मनःवुद्ध्यहंकारः चित्तानि नाहं
न च श्रोत्रःजिह्वे न च घ्राण नेत्रे
न आपः न भुमी न तेजः न वायु
चिदानंद रूपः शिवोहं शिवोहम।
हर हर महादेव ❤️
always seeking/always learning.
awesome talk.
Very learned speaker and audience!
Sanjay sir, German language too has a neutral form, apart from masculine & feminine. Strangely, a girl is called Das Mädchen but a woman is called Die Frau!
Not having "Shirk" concept is overexploited as - Baba + Chamatkaar -> Guru is like god -> Guru becomes God with exclusive temples.
Excellent and enlightening session.
Excellent! As always.
Allah is trancendental anthropomorphic deity who sits in a physical place called seventh heaven.
Brahman is both transcendental and immanent who is beyond all categories of human thought.
There is not a place where Brahman is not. There is not a thing that Brahman is not. There is not a time when Brahman is not. He in the time before and after Time where no time exists.
Brahman can only be indicated and not ever be fully described. All human descriptions of Brahman are incomplete at best.
Brahman is impersonal but can both assume and endow personality.
Allah is theistic. Brahman is empirical.
Allah has a theology . Brahman has an ontology.
Even Allah is a subset of Brahman since Brahman is entirety.
Would I be incorrect if I say that everything that exists, all forms of existence, including man, is sanatan?
Thank you Sanjay Ji🙏🏼
Thank you for your good work regards
Satogun (Sentient force) A sound is root sound of Satogun (Sentient force)
Rajogun (Mutative force) U sound is the root sound of Rajogun (Mutative force)
Tamogun (Static force) M sound is the root sound of Tamogun (Static force)
AUM = Sagun Brahm the Generator, Operator and Destroyer = GOD
The Satogun (Sentient force or Generating force) the force that which is cause of creation
The Rajogun (Mutative force or Operative force) the force that which is the cause of operation
The Tamogun (Static force or Destructive force) the force that which is the cause of detraction
AUM means Sagun Brahma that who generate, operate and destroy everything = GOD - G from Generator, O from Operator, and D from Destroyer so it is GOD word has come.
Hello Sanjay Sir, You said that even if it is Sagun Ishwar, it is transcendent and therefore does not distinguish. But in temples, the idols are manifestations of the divine that have attributes that distinguish based on the rules of the temple (as the temple is the abode of the deity). So how can you reconcile both these concepts?
Guruji Namaskar and Dhanyawad 🙏🏻🌈
Thank you Sanjay Ji ! 🕉🕉🕉
its a fact that Vedic Knowledge is the ,,blue print,,of every knowlege, ,,gnosis-gyana,and is Superior to every other knowledge especially the ,,Abrahamic,..second : the best defence that India has to tribute Christianity is St,Thomas the younger ,disciple of ravi ,,Yeheshua Hanozri,,{aramaic} ,that lived in India as an architect after the ,,resurection,, of His Spritual master..enough spoilers ,search for youre selves..
Is Dashraaj yuddh same as Devasur sangram mentioned in Ramayan and Purans? Another thing is to be noted about the Dashraaj yuddh is that it is mentioned in Rig-Veda, and Vedas are not the historical texts, They are Scientific or Spiritual knowledge texts , so to interpret History from a book of science may not be a good idea, Our traditional History books are Puraans, Ramayan and Mahabharat.
Wow, What an explanation… 🙏🏻
54:53 Regarding Monotheism and Monism, Monism is the everythingness, you can not have two everythings. The number ‘one’ is symbolic of limitation. If you have one, you can have two and you can have its opposite. Which is why Shankara uses the term Advaita ‘Not two’. Alain Daniélou wrote a beautiful book, ‘The Myths and Gods of India’ I highly recommend this book for all Hindus. The introduction looks at this Monism and the problems with the word ‘one’. My father was a Sikh, his point was this, we don’t use the term ‘one’ it’s a term for limitation.
Sir I strongly believe that Dharma is the basis of modern virtues ethics morals and protection of the environment health and safety can you suggest somes literature which can help me prove it
Shouldn’t dharma, if Truth ,be objective, a person, else it’s subjective and leads to manipulation
In your description you have said the agenda of Allah is to divide and punish. May I ask you what did Sri krishna did with Pandavas and Kauravas??? Did he not allow Pandavas to attack Kauravas and he asked Arjun to forget that his close relatives are on the other side as enemies and stand tall in the sight of God.
You mean Hinduism did not divide human beings into Caste system and punished them even before God Punishing them???
You are people of Hell Fire.
Too good Sanjayji. You should talk more about indian philosophy or shaddarshan. Brilliant. May Mahadev bless you. 🙏
unsubscribe all channels on which Haaris Sultan appears and watch other ex-Muslim channels with extreme caution.
Sanjay Sir is Awesome
God Is One And Many In Devine Manifestations Of All Creations! Many Parts Makes Up "One" Body!
If there is One God, He wouldn’t confuse man with different manifestations . It’s mankind after the fall, has gone his own way and made God of things, people , self, addiction etc
@@seekthetruthandthetruthwil2388 After Man Leaves His Father's House Of Many God's, He Went Seeking His Own God, From Which Came The Fall Of Humanity! And Worldwide Division For Kingdom Purposes! 🕉
@@winstonbachan3921 man left His Creator to seek his own way of good/bad leading to subjective decisions which harm mankind. God as Father has been calling His lost children back home, so to enjoy His presence for eternity. I too believed like you did, but as I searched for Truth, I realized Truth is a person who desires to indwell in me to help me walk in righteousness.
@@seekthetruthandthetruthwil2388 Why Are Religious Zeluts So Desperate To Convert Man For Kingdom Purposes? For Tithes And Offerings?
Again is CONSCIOUSNESS the correct translation of Brahman?
Infact there is no suitable word in English to refer to that principle of brahman unlike sanskrit where the words chith, turiyam , pragnanam, bhaathi , chaitanyam describe the nature(swaroopa) of brahman ...which means pure awareness or consciousness which goes beyond mind or body consciousness as seen in psychology or medical or western viewpoint..
So it is the nearest word available...
Wonderful explanations. Unfortunately, fools still will say my God and your God is different. Bhagavad Gita Chapter 12, discusses about form & formless worships of God too. Please include those things in your lectures to open the eyes of those Rajasic & Tamasiki people. Short minded people don't like to hear facts and ask questions. There will be no enlightenment if there is no curiosity and questions. Hinduism open for questions and findings yet it is multifaced . Dattataraya said, even a prostitute has her knowledge, therefore do not look down of them. Such is the way of Sanathana Dharma religion.
Best thing that Sanatan Dharm has is _'Psychology of Karma',_ *...No God ever gets in anybodies way,* but it's the _Karma_ according to which you'll prosper or suffer, ...God nor Loves neither Hates, just _Assists in a forms of Conscious Energy._
I may goo a little wrong cuz English is like the most damned n Limited language. 😅
God is universe 🙂🙂👍🏻
@Tanishq Desai yes
If a thinking being comes to the conclusion, either subjective or objective, that there is a Creator, a Supreme power, An almighty, commonly known as "God ", that person has no choice but to come to Islam. Islam is defined as the attainment of peace through surrender to the will of the divine.Period.It is the "deen e fitrat ".The natural way. Into which all humans are created. Most humans have a natural compass that recognizes one creator, one supreme power, in other words, One God. For even if there were two gods, they would have to be different from each other to be counted as two. So the smaller of the two, cannot be God, for by intuition we know that God is superlative in all ways to be qualified as God. An inferior God is no God. That's why the concept of trinity or multiple Gods is rejected by the Qur'an.
Here I have a small clarification to make. Here I am talking about the universal concept of God/ Allah (Allah is the common noun of God in Arabic language. You can call him by any good name) and not the narrow exclusionary Islam of the mullahs.
Islam is the natural way. Humankind is expected to use its intellect (that which makes us different from animals) and its emotions to ask the right questions, remove the hubris and find your way to realise the One,True Universal God (The Quran describes it as Rabbul Alamin,the God of the Universe, not Rabbul Muslimeen,the God of Muslims).
The criticism of the Islamic concept of God by the learned speaker was trivial (calling God vengeful),and his inability to provide a lucid concept of God in the sanatan dharmic viewpoint is to be noted. How can a universal consciousness be God?What is the meaning of universal consciousness. It's such an abstract concept that no amount of word salad can stick it up
God is Life and breathed Life into man. Islam teaches that death was default system for mankind which is against the very nature of God.
गुरु जी को दंडवत प्रणाम 🙏
Another Q: Brahma Kumaris explain four yugas (Satyug, Tretayug, Dwapuryug, Kaliyug) of 1250 years and total of 5000 years Kalpa: how this incorporates in your thoughts/concepts?
Do listen to Nilesh oak ji on yugas.
The shiva lingam actually represents the atomic energy
Zoroastrian Ahura Mazda is Sanskrit Asura Medha, Divine light.
Yes they are the same
It’s about indiaGod vs Foriegn born gods
Indian culture vs foreign culture let india 🇮🇳 decide
Hindu Gods married each other, exchange each others wives, killed each other, married their own children, abandoned their children, slayed their heads off, the goddesses drank blood of the demons..
When Shiva called parvatti deep black n blue, she didn't like it..she transformed into gauri.. the golden one. Or kausiki the kali manifestation.
Shiva removes one head of Brahma or kills him. Then..brahma jumps in fire.
Dunno what happens to his multiple wives .
Shiva marries again n again.
Sage Brigu curses him
Vishnu marries again and again.
our rivers are so polluted. Ganga was recently cleaned. Otherwise all waste is thrown in including idols. Garlands.. plastics...diyas. some peoples under wear.
2. Hindus have paap and puniya are there. But also judge is there. Shiva has 3rd eye. Naraka is also there. Yamraj is boss of Naraka.
3.no doubt our sages were great. But Mahabharata Ramayana are stories. BG is just 18 verses of Mahabharata.
4. If Krishna told Arjun when they were small then mahabharata wouldnt have happened. 1billion 660 million people wouldnt die.
5. Yes a good Christian is god fearing. Even hindus are God fearing. Dumb lady.
6. The hindu books are so much that people cannot read it. Olden days sanskrit wasnt even taught. Jesus is mentioned in the Vedas. Hindus don't even know that.
7. Mam the hindu Gods n Christian God is different. No use comparing the religion or the books.
According to Veda Saaram, “Mruth shila dhathu darwadi moortha vishwamavidyaya klishyanthi thapasa moodha paraam shaanthim nayaanthithe”, means, “A fool who is worshipping an idol gathers nothing but pain and he never attains salvation”.
Watch testimony of pandit Dharam Prakash Sharma , sadhu chellapa, and youtube hindu brahman accepts Christ. U will find so many testimonies of why the Bible is correct.
I now understand perhaps Brahman is what develops as cosmic potential is experienced, so i will continue to find questions. Very wise Sanjay Dixit. Interested in the afrocentric racial caste system of ancient Egypt which became judism, christianity and islam, seems to have had a destructive influence on earth so far. How can vedic wisdom develop more political strength in the west?
Egyptians didn’t birth the biblical religions. They had their own deities for different aspects of nature.
@@seekthetruthandthetruthwil2388 do some research
@@xoaddearth8028 yes I did, when searching for the truth.
Check the 10deities they worshipped for the 10 aspects of nature which were destroyed at the time of Moses that the pharaoh them leave Egypt.
@@seekthetruthandthetruthwil2388 the deities of which you speak were at one time common to all humanity and in fact were relic of pre dynastic Egypt.
Egypt is the story of how monotheism was created to and imposed upon humanity.
57:01 Jay Lakhani sir is no more. Om Shanti. 🙏🏼
Yes😭😭😭 I had many many questions to ask him perhaps my I was unlucky that I discovered him very late
How did Jay Lakhani die?
He was one of my Gurus.
Very sad to hear this.
@@laika5757 It is not known. He passwd away on the 4th Dec 2020 at his home.
Simply WOW ❤️
interesting explanation.. however if you want to understand Sanatan Dharma (for the layman) one should look into the shabads of the Sikh Gurus.
Here is Ang 437 by Guru Nanak ..It starts as
ਕਰਿ ਮਜਨੋ ਸਪਤ ਸਰੇ ਮਨ ਨਿਰਮਲ ਮੇਰੇ ਰਾਮ ॥
Kar Majano Sapath Sarae Man Niramal Maerae Raam ||
Take your bath in the seven seas, O my mind, and become pure.
The question is What are the 7seas? For this you can reference Vishnu Purana. Nanak then summarises the 7 oceans as
Niramal Jal Nhaaeae Jaa Prabh Bhaaeae Panch Milae Veechaarae ||
One bathes in the water of purity when it is pleasing to God, and obtains the five virtues by reflective meditation.
Kaam Karodhh Kapatt Bikhiaa Thaj Sach Naam Our Dhhaarae ||
Renouncing sexual desire, anger, deceit and corruption, he enshrines the True Name in his heart.
Houmai Lobh Lehar Lab Thhaakae Paaeae Dheen Dhaeiaalaa ||
When the waves of ego, greed and avarice subside, he finds the Lord Master, Merciful to the meek.
Naanak Gur Samaan Theerathh Nehee Koee Saachae Gur Gopaalaa ||3||
O Nanak, there is no place of pilgrimage comparable to the Guru; the True Guru is the Lord of the world. ||3||
Ho Ban Bano Dhaekh Rehee Thrin Dhaekh Sabaaeiaa Raam ||
I have searched the jungles and forests, and looked upon all the fields.
Thribhavano Thujhehi Keeaa Sabh Jagath Sabaaeiaa Raam ||
You created the three worlds, the entire universe, everything.
Thaeraa Sabh Keeaa Thoon Thhir Thheeaa Thudhh Samaan Ko Naahee ||
You created everything; You alone are permanent. Nothing is equal to You.
Thoon Dhaathaa Sabh Jaachik Thaerae Thudhh Bin Kis Saalaahee ||
You are the Giver - all are Your beggars; without You, who should we praise?
Anamangiaa Dhaan Dheejai Dhaathae Thaeree Bhagath Bharae Bhanddaaraa ||
You bestow Your gifts, even when we do not ask for them, O Great Giver; devotion to You is a treasure over-flowing.
Raam Naam Bin Mukath N Hoee Naanak Kehai Veechaaraa ||4||2||
Without the Lord's Name, there is no liberation; so says Nanak, the meek. ||4||2||
the translation is not very good but passes the general message
Psychoanalysis of the most famous and perfect psychopath must be an eye-opener. I will down load it and read soon!
Namaste
If God is a Fair and Just, wouldn’t He stand for righteousness and expect us to do the same. If God doesn’t punish evil and wickedness why then are we seeking justice on earth . It’s because He has given His sense of righteous in us
Yes God is formless , infinite, yet takes on a form when He fellowships with mankind. He is a personal God and uses attributes to describe Himself because we finite beings will not understand Him if He uses infinite terms.
Unlike Brahman who is an impersonal force/consciousness, without attributes.
Bhagwat Gita prescribe Karma which is critical force. The Karma is primal force as Krishna says.
Sanjay Dixit follows the Advaita Darshan, which means that all material things in this world are the perception and Brahman is the ultimate reality or Universal Consciousness. There are 6 Darshans (philosophies or conceptual design) in Hindu Sanatan Dharma, which differ based on logic, proof, and reasoning. I follow Kashmir Shaivism, which is sort of offshoot of Advaita but considers material things as real and the Brahman also to be real, with both part of Purusha (the Shiva).
God is Just full and Fair: like Lady Liberty is blindfolded has two sides balance in Love and Justice. All children (every human in every religion) is his child (receives Love and Justice)
That Brahman is ‘Nirgun’ or “Without Attributes” can also mean that it is “neutral”. In other words, Brahman is both good and evil which cancel out each other; or both Male and Female in equal proportion, etc...and this is how cosmic order is maintained.
@@gooddayok - That’s an incorrect argument. Love is a positive emotion whose opposite is Sadness, not Justice.
Justice is a positive whose opposite is Injustice.
Therefore, Love & Justice are on one side of the balance, whereas Sadness & Injustice are on the other side.
Also means that Lady Liberty represents only 50% of the total, and God cannot be 50%. Therefore, this Christian concept is incorrect.
the most genius and conceptually clear #sanjay_dixit, related to DHARMA in all aspects. Love you sir.
Please prepare a think tank and an army of great thinkers like yourself to combat antinationalist thank you sir
You missed the baha'i faith. There are many stepping stones on this journey each with different lessons.
There are 4200 religions on earth, what is the lesson?
To learn to co-exist. Certainly anything that harms another should be rejected.
Watch "the gate" documentary, you WILL be surprised
The idea that God has enemies, and needs human help in order to identify and dispose of them, is a little difficult to assimilate. It is not, however, all that alien. The concept of the enemies of God is familiar in preclassical and classical antiquity, and in both the Old and New Testaments, as well as in the Koran. Bernard
Understanding Muhammad by Ali Sinha, OK will try to find it and post link here
Download soft copy .
@@drute20 Thanks for reminding me!
Best bhagwat geeta in Hindi please suggest me
🙏🙏🙏🙏
Om Shanti Jay Lakhani ji
It's the same thing in different languages, times and under many misunderstandings. Having passed through floods, invasions, and any kind of catastrophe you may think. However, #Vedas persisted and carry humanity's truth. If you look closely at all ancient cultures, you will see the threads there still today.
In any case, the source of creation is universal, eternal, unknowable and patently present. Namaskaram.
व्रह्मः आसीत्
" यतो वाचः निवर्त्तन्ते अप्राप्य मनसा सह ``
Wherefrom the power of expression return without being able to proceed further is the point of presence of the Almighty relatively to the seeker.
In book Vimana Madengga Allahda with her girl friend and 9 ambasador with book Vimana, that time 23.000 BCE.- whos the Wisnu/Brahman/Siwa and Ruhudra- ????
🙏🏻🌈
Sir समझते सभी है पर अब हिंदी में सुनना पसंद है,
is it god of intellect or manas=emotions?
56:55 [Comparing the one to it’s manifestations]. Another analogy could be like the comparison of one tree,Yahweh, to the branches, devas, of another tree. The levels of comparison would be wrong. Of course the first tree, Yahweh/Allah, has no branches of manifestation. it therefore would be far better to be represented as just a pole like a Telegraph pole. So the comparison now should be a comparison of the pole, ie Yahweh, to the tree trunk, ie Brahman, not to it’s branches, Devas, which is what is being done.
We could and need to now play with to develop this idea a bit further, and consider instead the comparison of a single individual branch of a tree representing Yahweh/Allah, to a whole tree, Brahman with all its various Devata manifestation branches etc and see if the analogy fits a bit better.
Bearing in mind that Yahweh is described as ‘The God of Zion’ and Zion being a hillock outside of and overlooking Jerusalem. Therefore, Yahweh would be categorized as a Gram devata. Village deity.
Since he is also described as ‘The God of Israel’, ie another name for Jacob, that also makes him into a Kula Devata. Family deity.
Allah is the god of Kaaba. Ie also a Gramdevata. So to return to our analogy, the case would now be that of comparing a branch of a tree, Yahweh/Allah to an entire tree Brahman, including Devata branches and thinking your branch or twig, as representative of the entirety.
My question now is, Is the problem we face with Christianity in fact a result of what happens when minor deities become projected as universal deities? Because then god playing and demonstrating partisanship with his chosen people and prophets would make total sense. Personal deities look after their particular families /tribes regardless of what they get up to.
Hope that was helpful.
This is a new and logical explanation. It makes the entire picture clear. Thank you for the post.
@@ocs748 Thank You for your comment. Modelling is an important method of getting to grips with abstract ideas as you can play with them, you can further develop, refine, add to or modify these as I did above. i just typed out my thoughts as they emerged and played with them.
'What if .....?'
What if instead of xyz we used mnp?,
What if I looked at it this way?
What might make this easier?
What might make this easier to understand?
What might make this easier to explain?
Is there an easier way to do this?
Are all useful questions for one to pose to oneself and play with,
@@ivarhakuse8572 It does require your analytical ability, to ultimately transpose the Grama Devata and Kula Devata onto the Jewish/Christian scene in the former and Islam in the latter. Even though I personally have a Grama Devata and also a Kula Devata, it never occured to me to apply this concept to the Abrahamic religions, which was so apt and fitted like a T. Your post was an eureka moment for me when the hazy picture suddenly clicked into sharp focus. Thank you once again for responding.
@@ocs748 Thank you for your response! Of course, there is nothing wrong with Grama and Kula Devatas, however, we appreciate them for the personal functions and relevances to our lives and would never think of using them for imperialist political agendas. Please do look at some other comments here and see if useful.
@@ocs748 Have made a comment here, please see what you think please:
czcams.com/video/VvcOfUrHS5U/video.html&lc=z23aurbjxtfrx1f2gacdp430kemt0h1qh14cdjacxxpw03c010c
It was listening Rishi vaani....
Big fan of Jay lakhani 😊
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
ब्रह्म,गॉड, अल्लाह, की आंतरिक व्याख्या सुंदर से किया,इसका हिंदी रूपांतरण करें।सम्मान धन्यवाद
Aryan Invasion Theory Myth by Shiv Sastry
( Amazon Kindle )
Please this lecture translate in Hindi
Iswar nirakar h
Sanjay Dixit ji is a learned person, It is great to see watch listen him, watch his Jaipur Dialogues show, follow him in Twitter,
Is it true that Zeus had sent Poseidon the God of seas to go to India and stop the people there from worshiping Gods with elephant heads and mad women with bulging eyes and such things that could not have been more than Titans, or plagueds
Zeus has nothing to do with abrahamic religions Greek civilization and beliefs was different and abrahamic belief is different
@@shubhamdubey9561 The Hindu religion in its current state is not even Vedic religious ideology let alone Abrahamic religion. Widely accepted Abrahamic religious are three Judaism, Christianity And Islam , because they carry more or less the same thread.
The Vedic religion that the Arya brought into subcontinent, is deemed much closer to the one god concept and no moorthi puja of Abrahamic religions. Later the indigenous mythology of kathas, like Ramayana and Mahabharata got part of it and changed it slowly with more additional works.
Sanatan dharm religion says that you can worship God in form manner or in formless manner. There is nothing wrong in that. Everybody has its own way of worship.
And Hinduism religions also worship One God but the difference is that God has taken various forms.
It's more what you do, than what you believe. Hindus believe in a universal soul or God called Brahman. Brahman takes on many forms that some Hindus worship as gods or goddesses in their own right. Hindus believe that there is a part of Brahman in everyone and this is called the Atman. If you don't believe then search Hinduism One God you will get your information.
Quranic(words of Allah) verse 18:86 says that sun sets in muddy water lake at the time of evening.....lol I really amazed by depth of knowledge of so called all knowing Islamic God😂
There are thousands of scientific errors exists in Quran.....
Biblically animals too have a soul ( the seat of wisdom, emotions, will etc) . They don’t have the spirit tho as only mankind is created in God’s image when He breathed His Spirit into us to make us creative, righteousness justice mercy, agape love , Holiness , truth etc.
@Vlad Tepes that’s why Jesus told us to follow no man, rather to follow Him, because most men will teach what people want to hear. , and not the Truth
@Namo Namah dharma has to be a person, else it’s subjective and can be manipulated for selfish reasons.
Jesus was beyond a guru. He came to set us free from mortality and eternal separation from God, and return us to immortality by regenerating our spirit ,
@Namo Namah God Himself
Created Adam and Eve and the generations followed. After the flood, every civilization came out of either one of the 3 sons of Noah. Genesis10 shows that they were separated into 70 nations with their own languages.
In short, man walked away from God, his Creator, which leads to mortality and eternal separation. God enters creation manifested in the flesh as Jesus Christ to redeem mankind , regenerate our Spirit to return us to immortality.
@Namo Namah God exists. None creates Him. He created everything. The original scriptures were written in Hebrew but now translated to several languages
An assuming its the language that God used to communicate with Adam Eve.
@Namo Namah all I know is there was one original language in which god Himself spoke to people. Who thereafter passed it in to their generations. At the Tower of Babel the people separated into civilizations with their own language
Which would mean every language has the same base , with different dialects etc.
also since the Hebrews were scattered all over the world, their language would have been used in the nations that they went to.
Really surprised that Mr Dixit doesn’t know the biblical God. He is infinite yet breathed His Spirit into man at creation. When Adam walked away from God, His Spirit severed from man leading to mortality and eternal separation from God. He enters creation to breathe His Spirit back into man to return us to immortality.
That’s the basic concept because God, being Spirit is Life , and we have mortality and eternal separation when His Spirit is absent in us.
In short the indwelling of His Spirit determines immortality or not.
Another misinterpretation about the Word being God as the Book.
The Word of God means Logos, the Divine expression, the very source of creation. Genesis says, God created
everything with His Word. That creative power , Divine expression is the Word, who manifested in the flesh as Jesus Christ our salvation.
@Vlad Tepes just as a child has only one father and it’s a dishonor for the father and mother if he goes around calling the neighborhood men”father” likewise we have our being in One God , our Father our creator. But unfortunately because of the fall, each of us have gone our own way and worship creation or people or objects bringing dishonor to the one who created us.
Hum khud sirdi mai hai
So this is atheism..
The Rigveda
HYMN LXXXI. Visvakarman.
1. HE who sate down as Hotar-priest, the Rsi, our Father, offering up all
things existing,-
He, seeking through his wish a great possession, came among men on earth
as archetypal.
2 What was the place whereon he took his station? What was it that
supported him? How was it?
Whence Visvakarman, seeing all, producing the earth, with mighty power
disclosed the heavens.
3 He who hath eyes on all sides round about him, a mouth on all sides, arms
and feet on all sides,
He, the Sole God, producing earth and heaven, weldeth them, with his arms
as wings, together.
4 What was the tree, what wood in sooth produced it, from which they
fashioned out the earth and heaven?
Ye thoughtful men inquire within your spirit whereon he stood when he
established all things.
5 Nine highest, lowest, sacrificial natures, and these thy mid-most here, O
Visvakarman,
Teach thou thy friends at sacrifice, O Blessed, and come thyself, exalted, to
our worship.
6 Bring thou thyself, exalted with oblation, O Visvakarman, Earth and
Heaven to worship.
Let other men around us live in folly here let us have a rich and liberal
patron.
7 Let us invoke to-day, to aid our labour, the Lord of Speech, the thoughtswift Visvakarman.
May he hear kindly all our invocations who gives all bliss for aid, whose
works are righteous.
HYMN LXXXII. Visvakarman.
1. THE Father of the eye, the Wise in spirit, created both these worlds
submerged in fatness.
Then when the eastern ends were firmly fastened, the heavens and the
earth were far extended.
2 Mighty in mind and power is Visvakarman, Maker, Disposer, and most lofty
Presence.
Their offerings joy in rich juice where they value One, only One, beyond the
Seven Rsis.
3 Father who made us, he who, as Disposer, knoweth all races and all things
existing,
Even he alone, the Deities' narne-giver,him other beings seek for
information.
4 To him in sacrifice they offered treasures,-Rsis of old, in numerous troops,
as singers,
Who, in the distant, near, and lower region, made ready all these things
that have existence.
5 That which is earlier than this earth and heaven, before the Asuras and
Gods had being,-
What was the germ primeval which the waters received where all the Gods
were seen together?
6 The waters, they received that germ primeval wherein the Gods were
gathefed all together.
It rested set upon the Unborn's navel, that One wherein abide all things
existing.
7 Ye will not find him who produced these creatures: another thing hath
risen up among you.
Enwrapt in misty cloud, with lips that stammer, hymn-chanters wander and
are discontented.
There were some good questions, but it was surprising to find one from Ravi who seems to be completely influenced by Christian dogma and Monotheism; both of which are alien to Hindu Sanatan Dharma
Infact he understands the deeper truth, that the Vedas and Zoroastrians believed in the “I AM” God, who is beyond time and dwelt within man. And says that the Bible copied this “I AM” from them.
He doesn’t understand the biblical truth, hence assumes that the I AM God is not the biblical God.
The God of the Bible is Spirit and Life and dwelt in Adam and Eve. At the fall in the garden, His Spirit severed from man leading to mortality and eternal separation. Man tries to return toHim through good works, but unable as it takes Life to destroy death . That’s why Jesus came to breathe his Spirit/Life into man to return us to immortality.
@@seekthetruthandthetruthwil2388 Your assertion on Biblical God is fraught with errors and illogical reasoning.
1) Firstly, Adam and Eve are fictional characters since genetic evidence refutes any such 1st man and woman created by rapid prototyping;.
2) Secondly, if God was the Spirit which dwells in Human beings, why doesn’t the same Spirit dwell in Animals and Birds. Shows that this so called Godly Spirit is restricted to Humans only, an illogical argument.
3) Thirdly, if Jesus came as God in the form of Human and then died (crucified) then that Godly spirit went back after his death. Also means that Jesus’ role on Earth ended with his death. He did not even write anything, even his death is a mystery.
Too many loose ends in Christian God concept, which means that the Biblical God is false.
@@vikramrazdan5680 everyone knows that we are born of a set of parents, each born of a set of parents who can be traced to a set of first parents. All of us were in seed form in the first forefather. That’s why science traces genealogy on paternity basis.
2. His Spirit is His essence /Character of agape love, mercy , justice, righteousness, protection , provision etc which He put into man and made us a living soul. He loves each of His animals and will restore back everything at the end of the millennium reign.
3. Jesus is God in the flesh, He is the life giving Spirit breathed into us, when we receive His atonement. Mortality had power over mankind because of the sin nature. Jesus being without sin, took our mortality upon Himself, but because He is sinless, couldn’t be bound to the grave, thus His resurrection and promise of immortality / eternal life to us.
@@seekthetruthandthetruthwil2388 - Once again you are making wrong assumptions.
1. If we go by science, then Adam has to have a biological parent just like Jesus. Strangely, the Biblical God created Adam from dust by rapid prototyping and then Eve from Adam's rib; but chose not to do the same with Jesus....Science has universality, there are no exceptions. Stop talking about Science when you don't even know what Science is.
2. This is a nice Children's story above love, mercy, blah blah blah written by human beings. Anyone can also make a fictional God and write such a story. In fact, there are much better SciFi movies than this fictional Biblical concept of God and Jesus. Your argument still doesn't show why Spirit of God does not exist in Animals and Birds. You are just peddling blind faith without a semblance of any logic.
3. Jesus was in flesh until he was crucified, not any longer. It is stupid to argue that Jesus died but is still in flesh. This is illogical. Bogus.
@@vikramrazdan5680 if science can extend life , or devising néw ways to cut the mortality gene to bring about immortality, Why wouldn’t the Creator be able to breathe His Spirit into the dust, to make man a living soul. Life begets life, that’s why He being the Source of Life gives us life through His indwelling Spirit. But when Adam and Eve walked away from him, His Spirit severed from them , leading them to get life from plants animals and creative ways of manipulating the breath to extend life which doesn’t help beyond a few years. Jesus, would have to be born of Adam as we were in him in seed form, but He being God in the flesh, skipped Adam of mortal nature and was brought forth through the Spirit (like Adam) that’s why He is called the last Adam.
Even yudhisthir born without male intervention. How according to you, were people created.
Animals have a soul. They don’t have the Spirit which guides them to make righteous decisions. As to why they were created. Same as the way God created flowers for beauty.
Sin resulted in mortality of the body, that’s why Jesus had to take our mortality upon Him, so
He can restore our body into an immortal glorified resurrected body.
In short , it’s His Spirit that gives us life/immortality, and He desires to indwell our Spirit to enable us to live for eternity .
🕉️🔱🚩
I believe monotheism came into Abrahamic religions through the teaching of Moses. He lived in the time of remisis of Egypt. The Egyptians and Sumerians had polytheism. What I believe is during the decline of Roman empire the European society was very found and fired of priest (oracles). They were driven close to faith. So new politics of faith is framed with the help of existing knowledge all around the world. Especially the knowledge brought by Arabs, Greek etc. Then formed Christianity based gospels and genisis. From genisis from Moses, they Got the monotheistic single God. Islaam too took from it from a different point of view as the followers from ignored son ismayil. ***I don't know how moses pick monotheism, sometimes it's from free thinking or from some old sources.
I also like as a question Is the real name of Jesus is exactly Jesus? It is Yeshua in Hebrew and Isa somewhere else. There's a malayalam movie pranchiyettan of actor mammootty where he's asking above question unknowing that it is more correct in malayalam.
Monotheism is the One God who created Adam and Eve, long long before Moses
@@arunao3611 yeshua means salvation YHWH saves. Transliterated to Greek it was ioseus which then transliterated to Jesus . Isa is Islamic Jesus which has no root word and is not the same as the biblical Jesus.
Hindusims. is. the. Greatest
@Tanishq Desai - Almighty has several connotations, it can mean the Abrahamic God or one of the 'manifestation of Ishwar'. In terms of modern day religions (Blind faith based or Dharmic), Hindu Sanatan Dharma is the Greatest, no doubt. The sad part is that Hindus have been living under the influence of islamic rule and British Christian philosophies for 1000 years, and as a result of which Abhahamism effect can be seen with Hindus unable to differentiate between Hindu Mandir and and Islamic Dargah in particular.
Is it Bramhan or Brahman?
Brahman or actually said Brahm in sanskrit
Quran says all the universe and Earth created by Allah in just 6 days and out of 6 Allah take 2 days to create Earth....lol 😂
But scientists says that according to study currently universe age is 13,80,00,00,000(13.8billion) years and that of Earth's age is about 4,50,00,00,000(4.5billion) years..but this is not the only problem in this quranic verse, expansion of universe is a continuous process, mountains nonetheless continue to rise and erode to this day. Similarly, living things and their sustenance continue to evolve. So to say universe or Earth created in just some days is totally wrong...