Natufian DNA Ethnicity Estimate
Vložit
- čas přidán 10. 05. 2023
- Data Source: Lazaridis et al. 2022, The genetic history of the Southern Arc: A bridge between West Asia and Europe. Science377,eabm4247(2022). doi.org/10.1126/science.abm4247
Visit MyHeritage DNA: www.myheritage.com/dna
Can you tell me of other samples tested from the Natufian site in the Raqefet Cave? I had my mitochondrial DNA tested and it tied my direct female line to that site. But my mt haplogroup is N1a1a1a3.
one of the first farmers in history
Fantastic video. DNA analysis shows the people with the closest genetic links to those Natufians are the people of Yemen and Saudi Arabia, with North Africans and the Levant extremely close as well. Those people are the best representative of the ancient Natufian populations.
Garbage. Natufians are E1b1b. Same as the Horn and Some North Africa.
@@aa-gr2jh The only garbage here is your nonsense.
@@aa-gr2jhThe genetic analysis of the Natufian samples, and the spread of e1b1b show that even in the horn, it is mostly the result of ancient back migration of West Eurasians into North Africa. The genetic distance PCA analysis shows Yemenites and Saudi Arabians are the best representative of the Natufian population -- and that the ancient Egyptian population shares that ancestral component. Unlike those populations in the Horn, the "Khemites" lack the East African forager, Dinka and later Bantu components. Nice try at a straw man to run away from the data. I am sorry your Hotep fantasies have been destroyed.
No, not North Africans after the Yemenis & Saudis it’s horn of Africans. Ethiopans/ Somalis & Eritreans score 40%-55% but y’all conveniently overlook that fact because it doesn’t suit your agendas.
@@JamzYamz7 Wrong, as usual. Here is the actual autosomal PCA analysis showing the modern populations with the closest genetic affinity to the Natufians. Not an "Ethiopian" (who get 'Natufian' alleles from West Eurasian back migration) in site:
Distance to: Levant Natufians
* 0.09625471 Yemenite Mahra
* 0.10230838 BedouinB
* 0.10601159 Yemenite Al Jawf
* 0.10677567 Yemeite Ma’rib
* 0.10728016 Yemenite Al Bayda
* 0.10777985 Saudi
* 0.11268040 Yemenite Jew
* 0.12034008 Yemenite Amran
* 0.14084465 Berber Tunisia Sen
* 0.14091794 Egyptian
* 0.14155244 Libyan
* 0.14694403 BedouinA
* 0.15179403 Tunisian
* 0.15282649 Berber Tunisia Chen
* 0.15618300 Moroccan North
* 0.15954829 Palestine
* 0.16516262 Jordanian
* 0.16647889 Samaritan
* 0.17036458 Tunisian Jew
* 0.170572231 Mozabite
* 0.17085131 Algerian
* 0.17181797 Libyan Jew
* 0.17483096 Moroccan
* 0.17762681 Saharawi
See "Genomic insights into the origin of farming in the ancient Near East 2016" - Lazarisis et al (Nature Journal)
It would be awesome to have a myheritage analysis for ancient Egyptians.
From what I've seen they are genetically closest to Egyptian Copts, followed by Egyptians in general. Makes sense
Ancient Egyptians had around 50% Natufian ancestry, the rest was Anatolian Neolithic ancestry + Iran_N.
@@PaleolithicTimes Interesting. They were so brilliant.
@@GreatRaphael Fr
@@PaleolithicTimes Is Iran N similar to CHG? I read somewhere that Ancient Egyptians lacked the CHG component modern Middle Easterners have.
3:09 Wow there is even sample from England belonging to a Roman with Near Eastern genetic profile
Outlier too
How did you get there raw DNA data ????
He steals some bones from museum skeletons and make DNA expertise on it 💯
@@barguttobed 😂😂😂😂
Pretty much as expected.
Can't read white letters on white background
Pleas show us more studies of north african genome. As you knew that the oldest homosapian was descoverd in Morrocco. And the oldest. Also the oldest workshop for the manufacture of leather clothing and jewelry discovered in Morocco.
This is my paterna ancestor. Y DNA E1b1b1b2-Z830 is the shorthand nomenclature to The CTS102 nomenclature, but its the same SNP mutation
Nice results!
-Natufians were one of the first agriculturalist cultural groups in the Middle-East and the world! They lived in the Levant region during the Early Neolithic Age and were a mix of Basal-Eurasians and the Aurignacians (one of the first groups who entered Europe 45.000 years ago), they had around 5%-10% sub-saharan ancestry therefore they mostly carry E1b1b Y-DNA.
-Modern populations who score high Natufian ancestry are the Mehri people in Southern Yemen (60%) and the Bedouin Arabs (Nomadic Arabs 55%).
the real Arabs people
i'm european 42% natufian maboy
@@robertolang9684 Some Arabs (an ethnic) carry some Natufians DNA mixture. But ancient Natufians were not Arabs. They were originated from North-East Africa.
While ancient Arabs were from West Eurasian origin.
Except if the context of "Arab" refers to a region (Arabian Peninsula (and Levant)), Natufians were one of Arabian peoples.
@@aestheticterritory the arabs like the jews are , originary of the same admixed peoples ones pure natufians , from E1B line others adopted with natufian and J1 J2 LINE caucasoids , laurence of arabia born english , married with 7 ladies become arab now he must be a lot o arab descendants too
@@aestheticterritory everybody know that arabs rised , around or after the birth of the christians , they are from the same mixed populations
Can you do Zagrosians next ??
Cool results! All of his ethnicities were expected! True Natufian!
I got 20% Natufian ancestry on my dna results, why dont the Afro centrists take their dna tests and prove they are Natufian? They will score African hunter gatherer types mostly and no Natufian 😂
😂😂
Im an African man from kenya,mandera town and score 51 % natufian.what about that
@@bisharGellowMahad thats normal for cushitic Horner's they are a mix of natufian with indigenous eastern african groups hes talking about western africans
@@chakir348I’m from Somalia I scored about 40% Natufian and 7% iberomaurusian
@@bisharGellowMahadwhat test did you use
Can you maybe make a video about any Cnaanite group like the Phonecians, Israelites, Judeans, Ammonites, Moabites or the Edomites? That would be so interesting to see how much they're related to modern day Jews and/or Palestinians and other Levantine groups.
Well, their dna certainly very similar. But, modern Israel mostly Europeans, not semit.
czcams.com/video/xH7ypqWIpCo/video.html
Israelites are not Canaanites. Jews are; but not Israelites.
cannanite is a proliferation of so many people , today i don't carry cannanite dna , but i'm conected to them in the past , the palestinians and people in the area got plenty of cannanite
@@ndorobei4391About 50 percent of the Israeli Jewish population are Mizrahi Jews who have lived in the Levant for thousands of years.
Closest to modern Yemeni or Saudi results no doubt. Very nice 👌👍 Besides Natufian man reminds a lot of Ameridinians.
czcams.com/video/xH7ypqWIpCo/video.html
So Natufians are why negative canthal tilt is so common in Levant…
Also big Semitic bug eyes
Can you do oghuz?
@wratch The MA2195 is even purer and half Mongoloid one closest to modern Nogai. Just for interest i put Mongolian and Turkish groups to see who were closer and it seems Mongols were closer to this Ottoman than all other Turkish regional groups
The current high Yemeni and Saudi Natufian ancestry is derived from MtDna not Y chromosome, i.e. mother inheritance. The true Natufians are those who has Y dna derived from E-Z830. Someone who want to understand the changes that took place in Arabia has to separate descendants from E-Z830 from those J1 and run the calculation.
a lot of Horn Africans North Africans and Middle Easterns have Natufian DNA it peaks in Yemen and Saudi
No, lol North africans don't have a lot of natufian.
@@FireGodSlayer Egyptians have a lot of natufian and Libyans and Sudan 🇸🇩
@@NebyouSolomon-ek7fy libyans average 9%. They're more iberomaurusians
Looks like Natufians weren't kangz after all.
Lol only idiots thought that. xD
They indeed were "kangs"!! But the white man would NEVER lie or cover that up would he? 😂😂.. U mfs do know the oldest known mathematical artifact was found in Kenya.. Dates back to 30,000 b.c.. When that information gets too popular it won't be long before u people say they weren't "kangs" either😂.. DNA doesn't lie but u Flour Rangers damn sure do!
But they were nose, even worse
@@ANFWHGPIE23they weren’t yudes, modern udes are just an admixture of everything
The video precisely says that they were kangz. Not Western kangz though. Northeast, inhabitants around the Red Sea.
Iraqi Arabs gets 35% Natufian.
Lmao no. Yemeni are the closest descendants followed by Saudi, Egyptian, Tunisan, Libyan, Palestinian, Jordanians and then morrocans.
@@shafsteryellow
DNA tests shows that Iraqi Arabs have 35% Natufian.
@@salamyaya162 source
Iraqi Arabs Are More Than 80% Natufians. Purest Arabs After Yemen...
👏👏👏👏👏
Actually Y DNA E3b-Z830. Or E1b1b1b2.
What is Whg ?
Western Hunter Gatherer.
Western Hunter Gatherers, and the population he mentioned that is related to WHG's are the Aurignacians.
@@AnthropoTube
Thank you
@@massinissaziriamazigh8122 You're welcome.
Highest Natufian ancestry is the Yemenis and Desert Bedouins (~70%).
Yemeni mehri
What about The Palestines...Lebanese...Syrians n Iraqis?Dont they score high on Natufians?
@@cariocabassa Nope, Levantines are like ~35-40% as they mixed with Anatolian and Iranian Neolithic farmers.
@@gamalnassertv But I thought that Natufians were "Levantines" actually...weren't they?
@@cariocabassa Yeah, but very early ones, not the now people.
My ancestor. I am E-Z36113.
So he's the original canaanite
no, they pre-date the canaanites
although Arabs still are the closest living group to Canaanites as well as being the closest genetically to stone age Natufian culture
@@someone-wi4xlCanaanites Are Arabs...
@@someone-wi4xlThe closest living group to cannanites are Samaritans
My dna matches with Natufians and I’m 87% African.
Natufians migrated to Africa and spread agriculture
@@720babylonthat’s their original homeland they came from there
They are Mexican
@@720babylonmigrated from where?
@@twilajohnson2313 migrated from the levant to Africa, Arabian peninsula, Iran and Europe
As Arab I can see we are the real kingiz 😂
Bon et bah voilà enfin un truc un peu différent
Oee ta vu enfin ptn! Et mtn c’est reparti sur les steppes pour les 6 prochaines videos😂
@@barguttobed ahahaha tes un tueur
The original Lazaridis 2016 stated that Natufians don't have any Sub Saharan African dna. Nevertheless your results say that they also have East Asian ancestry which is mind boggling.
Natufians are Africans. E1b1b is African. You asiatics need to stop trying to steal our history. It's pathetic.
@@aa-gr2jhNapolean and Einstein were e1b1b lol -- very "African"😅
Forget about it bro. Natufians are washed out Subsaharans (Omotic). We know our people lol
@@lto4827 Then you don't know science.
Ancient groups of people were not that compartmentalized.. they got around.. they fought. Traded, raided, inter married, took others as slaves etc.. just bcuz they didn't have cars and planes and trains like we do today doesn't mean that they were completely sedentary... they have found even further back, homosapien and Neanderthal mixed bones, way before these peoples were on the scene..
There cannot be any 100% accurate account of any.people, with a non writing or written culture from pre historical era..
What we have unearthed so far pales in comparison of the things that are lost in the darkness of time.. besides, non of these ancient groups would have ever defined themselves among such racial lines as today..
The Shemites line of Abraham Issac Ishmael Jacob Esau Lot etc. yhg E1b1
Semite were E1b line.
but today Arab are J1 more Anatolian Caucasian line
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat yup thanks to the the Hurrians and Neo Caananites
Abraham, Issac, Ishmael, Jacob, Esau, Lot etc. never existed. They are only characters from an old myth. Most scholars and biblical archeologists view the patriarchal age, along with the Exodus and the period of the biblical judges, as a late literary construct that does not relate to any particular historical era, and after a century of exhaustive archaeological investigation, no evidence has been found for a historical Abraham.
E1B is greco-Ethiopians
@@azizyigido greco-Ethiopians is a interesting terminology never heard that before. But the Natufians are Proto Semetic, and the line of Akkadian’s and Ebla and such ancient Shem. Alot of Ethiopians are semites now the older ethiopians are nile valley people
so basically your average arab from any of the well known large arabian tribes
jordanian arab here from solaim tribe in origin and I got identical results
0:05 ok 💀
Never read natufian was half "basal eurasian" and half relaTed "whg" but mainly Dzudzuana like+ Ancient North African like or mainly basal eurasian (proto natufian)+ some africans component (northwest african IBM+ ancient SSAs pops).
It is from original Lazaridis 2016 article. I know, he then contradicted himself in the Dzudzuana article which btw is still not published. Natufians don't have SSA ancestry according to Lazaridis.
Cope
They dont have ssa
@@s66s46hell yes they did stop playing dumb, how do you think haplogroup E made it to the Middle East?
The Natufians _split_ from the Iberomaurusians - not the other way around. Iberomaurusian culture existed as early as 25,000 YBP, according to radio-carbon dating of organic matter that was found at the archeological site of Tamar Hat - Algeria; Tamar Hat was inhabited by Iberomaurusians.
However, the Natufian culture existed as early as only 15,000 YBP, so it was 10,000 years younger.
This implies that the Iberomaurusians preceded the Natufians.
However, the paternal haplogroup of the Iberomaurusians of Taforalt was E-M78, which poses a problem.
E-M78 did not exist when the Iberomaurusian culture began 25,000 YBP; according to YFull, E-M78 formed 19,100 YBP.
The same applies to the Natufians' paternal haplogroup, E-Z830; it did not exist 25,000 YBP, because it formed 23,500 YBP (according to YFull).
The most downstream paternal haplogroup that preceded both E-M78 and E-Z830 - and that existed 25,000 YBP - is E-M35. According to YFull, E-M35 formed 34,700 YBP. Therefore, E-M35 was the paternal haplogroup of the first Iberomaurusians.
Both the later Iberomaurusians' E-M78 and the Natufians' E-Z830 are downstream from E-M35:
E-M35 -> E-L539 -> E-M78 (E1b1b1a1)
E-M35 -> E-Z827 -> E-Z830
E-M35 originated in East Africa / Ethiopia, according to a peer-reviewed scientific article.
*Source:* "Origin, Diffusion, and Differentiation of Y-Chromosome Haplogroups E and J: Inferences on the Neolithization of Europe and Later Migratory Events in the Mediterranean Area" (2004):
*Quote:* _Both phylogeography and microsatellite variance suggest that E-P2 and its derivative, E-M35, probably originated in eastern Africa. This inference is further supported by the presence of additional Hg E lineal diversification and by the highest frequency of E-P2* and E-M35* in the same region. The distribution of E-P2* appears limited to eastern African peoples. The E-M35* lineage shows its highest frequency (19.2%) in the Ethiopian Oromo but with a wider distribution range than E-P2*._
East Africans / Ethiopians who existed when E-M35 formed - 34,700 YBP - did not have any Eurasian admixture; the Eurasian back-migration into East Africa occurred only 3000 YBP.
Therefore, the first East Africans / Ethiopians who possessed E-M35 would have had zero Eurasian admixture; they would have been indigenous, sub-Saharan Africans. This explains why the Iberomaurusians are modelled as inheriting 54% of their ancestry from the same source as modern sub-Saharan Africans in the peer-reviewed scientific article, "Ancient West African Foragers in the Context of African Population History." See Figure 5 in the main part of that article, and Figure S3.17 in its supplementary materials.
Therefore, sub-Saharan Africans migrated to North Africa sometime before 25,000 YBP and interbred with Eurasian women who carried U6 and M1 haplogroups, thus creating the Iberomaurusians. This is why the Iberomaurusians were part sub-Saharan African and part Eurasian.
The paternal haplogroup of the Natufians formed 23,500 YBP, which indicates that their specific ancestors within the Iberomaurusian population may have branched off from other Iberomaurusians that early. However, if they did so, they probably still practiced Iberomaurusian culture, since Natufian culture formed much later.
By the way, the Natufians did have sub-Saharan African ancestry; part of it is hidden in their Northern African ancestry.
*Source:* "Re-analysis of Whole Genome Sequence Data From 279 Ancient Eurasians Reveals Substantial Ancestral Heterogeneity” (2018):
_“The Natufian sample consisted of 61.2% Arabian, _*_21.2% NORTHERN AFRICAN,_*_ 10.9% Western Asian, and _*_6.8% OMOTIC [sub-Saharan African]_*_ ancestry. The transition in the Levant from the Epipaleolithic to the Neolithic period involved an increase of Arabian ancestry at the expense of Northern African and Omotic ancestries.”_
*Source:* “Genomic Ancestry of North Africans Supports Back-to-Africa Migrations” (2012)
“At k = 6 through 8, all North African populations except for Tunisians have sub-Saharan ancestry, present in most individuals, though this ancestry varies between 1%-55%.”
Therefore, the sub-Saharan African ancestry within the Northern African component could be as much as 11.66% of the Natufians’ overall genome.
21.2% of 55% = 11.66%
Adding this percentage to the 6.8% that the Omotic component comprises yields the following:
6.8% + 11.66% = 18.46%
So, the Natufians were as much as 18.46% sub-Saharan African.
Given that the Natufians had much less sub-Saharan African ancestry than the Iberomaurusians - but kept their sub-Saharan African paternal haplogroup - they must have been the descendants of Iberomaurusian males who intermixed with Eurasian females, generation after generation. This makes sense, because after the Natufians' Iberomaurusian ancestors moved into the Levant, they would have had to intermix with the locals in order to maintain enough genetic diversity to survive; so, they began exchanging women with the tribes around them, which must have been Eurasian. Note that humans are naturally patriarchal, which is why the Natufians would have maintained their paternal haplogroup despite diluting its source, which was their sub-Saharan African ancestry.
The above quote states that their Northern African and Omotic ancestries - the former of which contains hidden sub-Saharan African ancestry - was diluted with Arabian ancestry. Here it is again:
_"The transition in the Levant from the Epipaleolithic to the Neolithic period involved an increase of Arabian ancestry at the expense of Northern African and Omotic ancestries.”_
natufians being 20% east african would make sense condering they were about 50% whg derived. This males a lot more sense to me overall compared to the whole basal eurasian theory southern euros look so distinct when only this small part of their dna is different. Think of like patrick mahomes or other part black part white people the resemblance is uncanny
@@Datacorrupter234???
You again? No, natufians didnt have any subsaharan dna, that study you used with omotic as reference group isnt viable, it also said european hunter gatherers for example had percentages of oceanian, makes no sense. We cant use modern groups as reference for ancient groups. Natufians had no affinity to subsaharans in laziridiz et al 2016. Subsaharans do have eurasian dna, all have, proven by neanderthal dna in them and eurasian back migrations. It is likely that E originated among a basal eurasian like indigenous north african population, ancestral to both eurasians and subsaharans.
76% Natufian here
If J Y DN A, you aint Natufian. Only E1b1b MEN are Natufians, or are related to them. Stop begging us!
@@aa-gr2jh that's a du..mb comment haplagroups make only 1 % or less than your dna the saudis and yemenites have the highest natufian autosomal dna and are the closest to them genetically regardless of haplagroups
@@chakir348Except that the 20-30% Anatolian Farmer DNA has altered more than just Saudi and Yemenis’ haplogroup. North Africans, Egyptians, and Horners aren’t as hairy as Peninsula Arabs are
@@aa-gr2jh😂 autosomal dna begs to differ, there paternal line died out but the maternal line survived, woman matter too😂
Not really. Accordingly to the 2016 Lazaridis, et, al paper, Natufians belonged mostly to Y DNA E3b-Z830. Or E1b1b1b2. Some of their downstream subclade descendants also have the markers M123, M34 and M84. About 10-20% of modern Jews belong to it.@@kothar6159. Men bearing those markers also exist among the Near Eastern populations
I'm E1B1A from my dad and L0a1a from my mom and related to Ramsse the 3rd. Crazy 🤪 😜
Intef of Egypt is Natufa.
The original Modern Human population was in East Africa and consisted of Y-Haplogroups A0-T and BT, and Mitochondrial Haplogroup L.
1. Khoi and San peoples split from the original population in East Africa 150K years ago: Y-Haplogroups A0-T & B-M60 [BT -> B-M60]; Mt. Haplogroup L0 [L -> L0].
2. Pygmies split from the remaining population in East Africa 70K to 100K years ago: Y-Haplogroup B-M60 [BT -> B-M60]; Mt. Haplogroups L1 [L -> L1-6 -> L1].
3. West-African-Eurasians split from the remaining population in East Africa 70K to 100K years ago: Y-Haplogroups CT [BT -> CT] and DE [BT -> CT -> DE]; Mt. Haplogroups L1, L2, L3 [L -> L1, L2, L3].
4. East Africans: the remaining, indigenous populations of East Africa belong to Y-Haplogroups A0-T and B-M60 and to Mt. Haplogroups L0, L2, and L3.
5. Australian Aboriginals (and other Oceanians) split from West-African-Eurasians 60K to 65K years ago: Y-Haplogroups C, K, and S via BT; Mt. Haplogroups P, S, M via L3.
6. West-African-Eurasians split into West Africans and Eurasians 55K years ago: West African Y-Haplogroups and Mt. Haplogroups: D0 and E [CT -> DE -> D0, E], and L1 and L2; Eurasian Y-Haplogroups and Mt. Haplogroups: D, C and F [CT -> DE -> D; CT -> CF -> C, F], and L3 (as well as their derivatives).
7. Eurasians split into West Eurasians and East Eurasians 41K years ago: West Eurasian Haplogroups: F and its derivatives (e.g. F, G, H, I, J ... Q, R [R1a, R1b]), as well as derivatives of L3 (N, R, T, U, W, etc ); East Eurasian Haplogroups: C, D, N, O, as well as derivatives of L3 (N, M, C, Z, G, etc).
Australians were part of the Eurasians btw and they're considered that they were desnceded of the Basal east asians.
@석진김 I am aware that is a common opinion of the scientific community. However, others in the scientific community posit that Australian Aboriginals have been in Australia for 60,000 to 65,000 years, which is earlier than the estimated time at which proper Eurasians split from Africans (55K years ago). So, there is reason to believe that they split earlier. Additionally, I think the earlier split should apply to all Oceanians rather than just Australian Aboriginals.
@@AnthropoTube I am G2a-M406 my origin is from northern Anatolia.
@@es8994 You derive from the most recent major split in the list, which was between West Eurasians and East Eurasians.
Your Y-haplogroup: F -> GHIJK -> G -> G-M406 (G2a-M406).
where would e1b1b fit into all of this?
I’m an Uzbek Jew with 25% natufian dna
31% from Somalia
Didn’t scored 100% Middle Eastern cause Middle Eastern in my heritage is already Zagrossian/Anatolian farmer admixed
yeah, the north african dna is js confused basal eurasian ancestry
Zagrossian-Anatolian farmer mix is called West Asian and it peaks in Kurds.
@@alsima7742 he meant middle eastern there = natufian+anatolian farmer mix
Middle East Is Not A Race. Natufians Are Arabs...
After the Yemenis & certain Saudi tribes it’s horn of Africans. Ethiopans/ Somalis & Eritreans that score 40%-55% natufian but y’all conveniently overlook that fact because it doesn’t suit your agendas. We have more natufian than the average “Arab” Palestinian, Iraqi, Syrian, Lebanese.
You're saying "Ethiopians" have more Western Asian ancestry than the average "Arab"? lol. Here is the actual PCA genetic analysis showing the closest genetic population to the Natufians. Not an "Ethiopian" (whose 'Natufian' ancestry is from ancient Western Asian back migration) in sight:
Distance to: Levant Natufians
* 0.09625471 Yemenite Mahra
* 0.10230838 BedouinB
* 0.10601159 Yemenite Al Jawf
* 0.10677567 Yemeite Ma’rib
* 0.10728016 Yemenite Al Bayda
* 0.10777985 Saudi
* 0.11268040 Yemenite Jew
* 0.12034008 Yemenite Amran
* 0.14084465 Berber Tunisia Sen
* 0.14091794 Egyptian
* 0.14155244 Libyan
* 0.14694403 BedouinA
* 0.15179403 Tunisian
* 0.15282649 Berber Tunisia Chen
* 0.15618300 Moroccan North
* 0.15954829 Palestine
* 0.16516262 Jordanian
* 0.16647889 Samaritan
* 0.17036458 Tunisian Jew
* 0.170572231 Mozabite
* 0.17085131 Algerian
* 0.17181797 Libyan Jew
* 0.17483096 Moroccan
* 0.17762681 Saharawi
See. "Genomic insights into the origin of farming in the ancient Near East" - Lazarisis et al (Nature Journal 2016).
I have 44% natufian ancestry, the paternal line died out in Arabia, meanwhile it survived in the Horn and North/Northeast Africa.
@@kothar6159 what’s your ethnicity
@@dareal05Your point ?
Eastern africans other component's are nilotic and omotic like its very diverged from what made the natufians mostly was whg like and basal eurasian the anatolian farmers and iberomaurusian component in north africans and levantines put them closer to natufians compared to eastern africans
Haplogroup E-M35
Possible time of origin: 34,800 BP[1]
Coalescence age: 23,900 BP[1]
Possible place of origin :East Africa[2]
Ancestor: E-M215
Descendants: E-V68, E-Z827
Defining mutations: M35
EM35 originated in North africa
@@FireGodSlayerbullshit, haplogroup E is an East African (Omotic) haplogroup stop playing dumb
@@lto4827 We're talking about e-m35 not e-m215
Surprising that the natufian man doesnt have a hooked nose
The Aguilera nose comes from Iranian Farmers and Anatolian Farmers. Anatolian Hunter-Gatherers , Iranian Hunter-Gatherers and Caucasian Hunter-Gatherers all derive their DNA from Dudzuana or a very similar population.
@@user-yt3xd2jl6d the natufians themselves drive lot of ancestry from the dzudzuana like population
E1b
All I say is that we got around in ancient times. WOW
Aucune précision dans votre étude
La démarche est à rebours de la réalisation Nord Est Centre Est
Ne diffusez pas n'importe quoi
Please
LMAO you just had to ruin it at the end by saying N. African and Jewish, didn't you. Not a chance. The Natufians were A EURASIAN population that *might* have come from the ARABIAN PENINSULA. And WESTERN HUNTER GATHERERS, who were European. You had it right at the beginning before garnishing it with lies. Don't lie to your viewers. Anyone reading this can refer to the actual paper by LAZARIDIS et al to get the facts. NOT AFRICAN, NOT JEWISH.
Western Hunter Gatherers were not just Europeans, they were ancient West Eurasians inhabiting Europe and Western Asia, the Middle East is inhabited by Basal Eurasians, the Natufians arose from the mixing of these two groups, influenced the genetics of modern populations of the Levant and North Africans, Jews arose in the Levant and were genetically influenced by Natufians, Haplogroup E of modern Jews is of Natufin origin and strongly related to modern North Africans
@tsa3b"The vast majority of *"*hair samples discovered at the site were cynotrichous Caucasian in type as opposed to heliotrichous Negroid, a feature which is standard through dynastic times*"* .. Although most of the hair found is the natural dark brown color, natural red hair was also discovered ... samples were examined microscopically"
Joan Fletcher, PhD EXCAVATION REPORT AT BURIAL SITE - PRE-DYNASTIC SOUTHERN EGYPT (circa 3600 BC)
Sorry, still not African. A half-Caucasian people who would go on to become the Early European farmers, one of the three major genetic population of Europeansand you want to claim *them* as African? Get real, get a life.
7000 years ago, all of the inhabitants of Southern europe were black. Look up, Cheddar man. It makes sense that the natufians were african like.
@@forgive.them. I'm Lebanese. Natufians were part of my ancestors. None of us are black. Not even close. Most of us are white, many of us with blonde hair or blue eyes. Cheddar Man wasn't black either. He was darker skinned than modern Europeans (like Natufians were). But not black or African. The genes for light skin entered our dna long before 7,000 years ago. You can look that up.
I know people with similar faces.
They look Indian to me
They are closest genetically to the people of Yemen snd Saudi Arabia today.
Everyone who is E-m84 is a Natufian descendant.
E-v12
@@shafsteryellow E-V12 is from horn of Africa
E-M84 is Natufian and still mostly in Levant and Arabia (especially some tribes like Harb)
Ancient DNA
Natufian remains were found to have carried haplogroup E1b1 (1/5; 20%).[4] Mitochondrial DNA only specifies the mothers lineage and does not contain any of the Father with contain the Y-chromosome. (African)
One of the first brown people
@@mr.savage2586 Indian ancestors were Dark as Africans
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat They contributed a little bit to Uzbek genepool too so they are your ancestors as well
@@barguttobed Sorry, i have no their genes, I'm glad that my country is clear not dirty 😁
And I'm pale White remnant of Indo Iranic population in Central Asia, tha already exist, only me
@@barguttobed uzbek have some of their blood it's oke.
but North indians have high past Central Asian ancestry.
No he is wight
Ha
Background on the E1b1a Haplogroup:Remains found in modern day Israel were analysed and confirmed to carry
this haplogroup, dating as far back as the Natufian culture - a peoples living in the Levant (Eastern Mediterranean area of Western Asia) some 14000 years ago.Haplogroup E1b1a, also known as E-V38, is a major Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup that is primarily found in Africa. It is most common in present-day sub-Saharan Africans and African Americans, and is associated with the spread of Bantu-speaking populations in West Africa.
E1b1a isnt in natufians, its e1b1b
@@s66s46 E1b1a beeb in that region over 20k years
Goiko Mitich😂😂😂
They're Arabs. No Need To Fight In The Comments...
Lol arabs are j1 not e-m35
@@shafsteryellowHaplomemes Are Irrelevant...
They aren’t. They are very much relevant.
@@JonahOfCanaan172They Are Arabs. Cry Louder...🥰
@@shafsteryellowIrrelevant. They're Arabs. Haplogroup Mean Nothing...
Pure Turk
Wtf
Yes it’s Somali Aziz Yigido Neolithic ancestor👍🏼
Oh yes,the best Dna in the world,Adam and Eve were both turks❤🔥🧞♀🧚♀🧞♂🧚♂🍎🏇
@@ver_idem Weareallturks
pure persian
Youd think since so much of southern Europe especially is decended from the natufians theyd at least come up in the results
No they arent, natufian is non existent in most of them
@@s66s46 weren't eef and natufians the same stock?
@@TheLasTBreHoN they mostly descend from the same dna but not fully
Natufians Are Arabs Of The Arab Race...❤
People can say what they want about how Natufians were this and that but I guarantee you can't prove that the first man looked like that. We have tribes all over the world today that have wooly haired people having straight hair people never the other way around.
The first human is irrelevant to Natufians hundreds of thousands of years later and the consensus is they most likely resembled Australoid people with "Negroid" traits such as dry, tightly curled hair developing later.
Ancient arabs people
🐫🌵🦎🏜
@@Alghi451 think us for your Brad you are savages lolllll
@@Alghi451 🪳🇹🇷ancer
@@desfighter yeah araps are
@@desfighter 🦎🏜🌵🐫
WISHFUL THINKING.
Please upload Canaanite DNA test? I'm sure it's black
ha ha ha that guy is funny
Th edible states that origami cannanites were Hamitic ?
@@beast9125 ya you not complete wrong , Hamitic women , iranic man , some hamitic man and women they were a mix
@@robertolang9684 no, they were black
just like ancient egypt
@@AhmedAl-Sudani-kv6ct how you can explain haplogroup j1 a caucasoid haplo in most of cannanites do you know anything og genetics or just follow others and say balala la ?
Look like typical inhabitant south Europe!
Nobody in southern europe looks like that
More like the western hunter gatherers of Europe before farming
@@chakir348 Exectly like east mediateraen people. Like Greek people, Armenian people, Iranina people. Probably something armeno-orientalid phenotype.
black but with 98% caucasoid admixture
No? They had no subsaharan dna at all
@@s66s46Recent studies show Natufians had Omotic ancestry, deal with it.
They were prototype population of Jews and Arabs. J2a2 haplogroup is very common among Jews. The land of Israel is Israel. They were brothers. And the fighting continues to this day.
The Jews have only small amount of Natufian admixture. They are mostly Anatolian.
@@salamyaya162 not true but believe whatever you want
The Natufians were black people, they mixed their seed and that why see the image shown in this video... I've come clarify this disingenuous propaganda in this video... The Ancient Nuttufians were a black civilization coming from Africa and built the civilizations in the middle east/Asian world ...
Yes that's correct
Cry more.
@@MrA-ir3me Cry about what ?
@@MrA-ir3me Why should I be crying about Europeans and modern-day Arabs lying 🤥 about the Natufians...
@@MrA-ir3mecry about what? I’m Somali & have 50% natufian. He’s right.
Yemenite Jewish Dna 🤓
Sus la
Yemany Jews are Arab by there DNA they don't have any similarty with other jews
Yemenite Jews have nothing to do with other Jews. They are Arabs from Yemen who converted to Judaism Yemeni Jews and Yemeni Arabs cannot be distinguished from each other by DNA type
They look Indian
Na you just can’t get past skin
real palestine natives are natufian looking people (black hebrew israelites) and some arabs
We don’t look like Bantus
Isralites were not black.
Nope
What Do Mean "some Arabs"? Natufians ARE Arabs...
Palestine not Israel, that's what i was waiting for Natufians!
israel^*
@@alvaro6943 palestine**
Why not Palestine?
why Israel?
czcams.com/video/xH7ypqWIpCo/video.html
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat because of women they still living in stone age fighting for women all the time they like to have 7 so not enough for everyone
He looks like South Indians
Not At All...
They were black
Yemenis and Saudis are black ?
E1b1 not African and not black E This haplogroup is particularly present in the Middle East, North Africa, Caucasus, as well as in Southern Europe.25% to 30% are in haplogroup E1b1b (or E-M35). Using Y-chromosome DNA from male Jews, a study sought to trace the patrilineal lineage of Jewish priests
(Cohanim).
Yeah black...........you are trying way to hard to proof they are not black, thats how I know they are black@@user-ln9ib2kf1x
@@a1-m.g.s556COPE DUDE
@@a1-m.g.s556 ok so as a Saudi i'll say "whatsup nigga" you will be Ok with that? since i'm black you know...
i have 81% Natufian ancestry and closest modern population genetically to said ancient culture
They originated out of Africa bro. Don’t fall for the Jedi mind tricks
No, They're Arabs...
😂
@@s66s46haplogroups never lie, now go back to worshipping your stone
Natufians didn’t share Neanderthal dna unlike modern eurasians , the only other group of people to lack Neanderthal dna are black Africans , the natifuans were from the E haplogroup and migrated from east Africa ,
Southern Arabia is home to a land of people with austronesian and African dna and we’re the originators of the Arab language and not the Indo European populations that later filled up the Arabian land , and not to mention the modern European look wasn’t even around 10k years ago
Natufians are the original Arabs came from the Middle East. They are a brown race. They mixed with pale Turkish people and made the modern day “Arab” which is really just watered down Arabs
The original Arabs were nomadic africans.
The E haplogroup not from Africa its from middle east countries , update ur information.
@@user-ln9ib2kf1x I am correct. Google, "dna haplogroup map" and look around. Also, the "Middle East" used to be considered North africa.
@ari-jv5oi I never seen a pale Turkish that is not of Balkan or native Caucasian (like Cherkes) descent. And I lived in Turkiye for 12 years. Turkish people are generally tend to be olive skinned, some are brown skinned, some are tanned, and some are light skinned (not so pale).
Akkoyunlu Turkish State Can you share the DNA test result?
persian
Turk🔞
Natufians Are Arabs...
Natufians were African not neanderthal and Africa babies smmh
😂
This is Fiction 😂😂😂 the Natufians weren't neanderthal
Ha