Ancient DNA Unravels Where the Etruscans Came From
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 08. 2024
- Delve into the captivating world of the Etruscans, an enigmatic civilization that thrived in ancient Italy. For centuries, their origins have remained shrouded in mystery, fueling endless debates among historians and archaeologists. Join us as we embark on a captivating journey to unravel this enigma, utilizing the latest advancements in genetic research to shed light on the true ancestry of the Etruscans.
Data Source:
Cosimo Posth et al., The origin and legacy of the Etruscans through a 2000-year archeogenomic time transect.Sci. Adv.7,eabi7673(2021).DOI:10.1126/sciadv.abi7673
Reference:
Margaret L. Antonio et al. ,Ancient Rome: A genetic crossroads of Europe and the Mediterranean.Science366,708-714(2019).DOI:10.1126/science.aay6826
Visit MyHeritage DNA: www.myheritage...
This is good stuff, but I wish you would tone down the background music.
yup
OMG Please!
Bro you don't know how thankful I am for you deciding to post videos again. Kindly do more of genetics of Neolithic cultures, bronze age civilizations and hunter gatherer populations of Eurasia🙏
Of the Balkans
I wonder if he can do something like Bacho Kiro or Zlaty Kun
they are RUS ( russians)...
@tatianayegovtseva9737
Among Serbs' dominant haplogroup is I2a2 Dinaric Danubian haplogroup younger European Mesolithic haplogroup usualy 67% among men from Hercegovina to men in Romania 30%. Among Serbs from Hercegovina 67% is higher conc. I2a2 and Serbs from East Serbia 40%. Serbs have 18% of R1a Slavs haplogroup and 18% E- V13 or Meditheranian haplogroup. E- V13 haplogroup is higher in Monte Negrian Serbs up to 27%.
His recent videos are blowing up in viewership, he really should take the opportunity to grow his channel and post more.
You definitely can separate genetics from language, one is biological the other cultural, one can not be changed the other is learnt
Yes, exactly. And there are interesting sociological reasons.
not in our ancient past before cities and state forced unification
pots are people and people pass on own language father to son
@@szymonbaranowski8184You forget women change their language all the time. If they come from an outside community, they have to learn a new language, i.e. change their language.
There might be a very good explanation for the Etruscan males having Steppe ancestry but not speaking Indo-European language: Steppe men raided Etruscan villages. Etruscan women got raped by Steppe men. Steppe men left. Etruscan women stayed and had sons with Steppe ancestry. These sons stayed in the community and learned to speak Etruscan as mother tongue. The same probably happened with Basques. Unpleasant but nevertheless a likely scenario.
Also, one genetic study on 82 individuals over two damn millennia doesn't necessarily provide definite results.
The conclusion of the study is that most of the Etruscan individuals were autochtonous... at least since the first millennium BCE. And then it changed when the Romans conquered Tuscany.
It doesn't mean that the ancestors of the Etruscans weren't from some other place before that. It also doesn't mean that all Etruscans were necessarily descended from the same local stock.
The archaeological evidence is much, much more helpful to identify the origins of the Etruscans than genetic studies. And it seems to show that the ancestors of the Etruscans actually came from the north (the Alpine region), where there's also the rhetic language group that is theorized to be related to etruscan.
We also know that in Roman times, the great etruscan families were still active, so it wasn't necessarily a population change in which the elite was progressively replaced. In fact, what's weird is the isolation of the Etruscans priori to Roman conquest. What happened in the Bronze age and the early Iron age that prevented the Etruscans from mixing with Mediterranean people? Everything points at a very prosperous civilization, but somehow the gene pool was still rather homogeneous. This seems to indicate a contradiction.
The genetic study didn't resolve anything, in fact it only raises more questions. How does a prosperous civilization like the Etruscans, in the melting pot of the Mediterranean see, keep the same local gene pool for centuries? Why no population exchanges? And another intriguing fact - it's only during the roman empire that the population changes. What changed between the republic and the empire?
@@Ezullof there are at least 6/7 other studies that reach the same conclusions (2-3 on mitochondrial DNA, and the rest on autosomal DNA).
The Etruscans in the picture are such handsome people.
The Greeks painted them with black hair. But in fact they are blonde-haired and have blue eyes. They were really beautiful and tall. And they still live in the Caucasus.
They were whiter than indo-europeans lol
@@MM-pk2vu That's completely incorrect.
@@yankee2666 What's wrong?
Italians are beautiful people.
I have some beautiful earrings from the British Museum shop, that are exact copies of Etruscan earrings that were unearthed by archaeologists, and on show at the British Museum. They are life size, golden oak acorns.|The workmanship of the originals is amazing.
The results aren't that surprising. They remind me of the Basques, who also received an indo-European influx, but it did not result in a corresponding language shift.
exactly
@QueenChristine826
Basc is a pre- indoeuropean genure that survived the last Würm glaciation (~ 15.000 - 8000 BC in the climatic refuge) If they had contacts with the indo-european immigrants, this did not change their identity nor their highly structurated language.
some say the basque peoples have some origin in lands now lost in the atlantic sea. (that millenia ago connected the americas with Europe). Maybe the etruscans as well. The heat map might suggest that
Same with the Iberians, Tartessians and Rhaetians. There were quite a few pre-Indo European language holdouts among Indo-European peoples, until Latin absorbed all but one of them.
@@Adsper2000 Some compelling arguments have been put forth that the romance languages do not come from Latin, but yet older ancestor. Latin is a sibling, but not the mother tongue. (Carmen Huertas, Ibelieve her name was.. Catalan) Search for her book. Very interesting. She is doing research into the Iberians scripture etc.
The DNA Examination of the Etruscans solved no mystery, because for decades archaeologists and anthropologists had argued that there was no more mystery about the origin of the Etruscans, because the Etruscans were an indigenous people. DNA testing simply confirmed what archaeologists and anthropologists had been claiming since at least the late 1980s.
Well, not all Archaeologists held this perception.
... and it is most welcomed to have Lab based Science provide validation.
The clarity of repeatable findings is the gold standard of resources. That's a value most welcomed in validation of History Stories.
Beth Bartlett
Sociologist/Behavioralist
and Historian
Well, not all Archaeologists held this perception.
... and it is most welcomed to have Lab based Science provide validation.
The clarity of repeatable findings is the gold standard of resources. That's a value most welcomed in validation of History Stories.
Beth Bartlett
Sociologist/Behavioralist
and Historian
The origins of the video's culture of "scientific" storytelling have been shrouded in mystery for centuries but now we are finally able to conclude... (strings and horns rising)...
...they're American.
I TOTALLY AGREE THIS IS A STUPID IDIOTIC CLICKBAIT VIDEO NOTHING MORE
@@hagenkleemann7309
YEAH AND BY THAT STATEMENT THIS VIDEO IS TOTALLY CLICKBAIT NOTHING MORE
When the world needed him most, he returned! 👍🏿
🙏💯
This may not help, but in N
Europe,several Finno-Ugric peoples +!own countries (mostly)
have mostly Indo Euro DNA, but
they speak several
non Indo Euro languages in their own language family,?📝BUT their many more peoples Il across N of Russia,?from Finland to Alaska also speak N Adam origin Finno Ugric languages,BUT they
have little or no Indo Euro DNA.
No 1 knows why.
The F you talking about??
@@revskull He took a break for a long time before this video came out
It could be, that the reason that they had male dna from PIE, but kept the language and customs of their indigenous European roots could be that PIE men came to the region and supplanted the local men, and taking the local women as their wives. So, while the fathers were PIE, it was the mothers, who were indigenous, raised and educated the children. And as such, the language and customs were largely retained.
They just say it's indo european and then say where it is supposed to come from, that is not proven in any way and is disproven by endless finds like this and especially by the basque who never got indo europeanized and never got their dna changed but still have tons of r1b. And the fact that the whole med had very similar DNA in ancient times even though the north was indo european and the south was semitic. Game over, it's just nonsense.
@LTPottenger southern Europe was not emeric. The European Farmers were genetically linked to the Anatolian-Levantine Farmers. The Semetic peoples came from farther south, then spread east to the Tigres-Euphrates region.
In Southern Europe, the EUROPEAN farmer group replaced almost entirely the Western Hunter Gatherers, but as you move into Northerrn Europe the European Farmers mixed with the WHG in increasing amounts the farther north you go.
The PIE dna in Europe similarly was increasingly mixed as we hent West, mostly the PIE dna introduced was on the male line, with increasing amounts of retention of EF mitochondrial dna as you go west and south. With a lot of the difference being cultural diffusion of PIE culture rather than genetic diffusion.
@@spamfilter32 You keep spewing theories as if they are fact. The DNA says it's nonsense, that's all there is to it.
@@LTPottenger my statements are based on the dna evidence.
@spamfilter32
This is a good hypothese that merits elucidation.Otherwise it is hard to believe that the Villanovians whould have learned a non indoeuropean language and display an unknown artistic and comportamental life style.
The " italianicity" of the Etruscan has been defended only by the italian linguist M.Pallotino, and was recieved with great satisfaction by most italian politicians but not all serious historians and paleoontologists.
To draw a final conclusion about their genetics,you need a lot more then ten samples in two local cemeteries..The Anatolian similarities are hard to ignore,in culture , language and political system.A famine in ancient Lydia caused their massive colonisation of these parts of Italy,with Lemnos as their first stop to this voyage,and their linguistic and genetic relatives,as Herodotus, Plutarch,Stravo and Hellanicus have all written.A great civilisation can never erase themselves and they are surely not mysterious..They were simply settlers who got eventually,many of them,returned and many also stayed and integrated with the local population.
Its actualy wishfull thinking because everyone claimed ancestry from well known myths in this case Romans from Trojans. Rest was than made up by historians. Similarily later writers found links to ancient characters in Bible for their nations when they became Christian.
@@kristijangrgic9841 But as the Troyan war aftermath,this immigration from a wrecked place to a wealthier makes perfect sense.Often in history,historians even today,prefer the mystery from the boring reality of immigration..As for the Christians,we all are descended from pagan tribes, that's the truth and we embrace it fully!😁
All Neolitic Europeans had spoken non-indo-european languges prior to the Indo-european migration ( Basque and Kartvelian languages are still remnants of that era ) , accordingly the first wave of Indo-european as a minority must have adopted the indigenous language until the subsequent massive waves of indo-european settlers outnumbered the indigenous population.
Yes. This is the most plausible explanation. Add that some Russian scholars recently discovered interesting similarities between the Etruscan language and some Kartvelian ones (Svan in particular) spoken also today in the South of Caucasus. It is possible that some ancestors of this people migrated in Europe during the Neolitic, mixing then with the previous European inhabitants and thereafter with several waves of indoeuropean invaders. Perhaps.
@@silviosposito375 That is quite a plausible theory, considering the fact that Caucasia ( Kartevalian speakers region ) used be called " Iberia " , a rather mysterious coincidence with Iberian peninsula i.e. Spain, but it makes sense if one is aware of pre-indo-european cultures across Europe .
Kartvelian are south Caucasus language not indo european, they are not even closely related to Basque people, only the name of their kingdom Iberia raises questions
@@kenwood2682 As far as their phenotype is concerned , do they look very different ?
@@majidbineshgar7156 no they don't, it doesn't mean they are related based on their unique language
This was oh, so, so interesting. My sincere thanks to you for providing this information in such a level-headed manner.
Their art is the same as Minoan civilization on Aegean sea back in the 2nd milenia BC
it's called Orientalizing and it's not specifically related to the Etruscans.
....there are no features n traits of orientalising in the minoan sir...have u seen the frescos...the jewelry the architecture...the Aegean is europes backyard from the minoans to the Cretans....thats why the minoans fought with such rage against the mongols but not against the venetians
Thanks for sharing your insights into the origins of the Etruscans. I find it fascinating.
How many individuals made up the DNA analysis?
A very small sample size could lead to erroneous results.
Imagine your whole civilization, history, everything you are reduced to the sentence: "Oh yeah, those guys the Romans ran over..."
That's basicly most of western europe summarized 😂
well the roman was a small latin tribe and they also was taken over by the italics (among them etruscan) and the greek.😉
@@horror11 The Romans literally annihilated and assimilated all the other ITALICS and CELTIC tribes in Italy so much that no one out Italy ever knew about them and their past…. (the great majority)
Vero ma molte città stato etrusche
Non sono state dominate le 2 culture si sono assimilate e i latini hanno appreso e incamerare tanto della cultura etr. Non sò se lo sai ma i primi rè di Roma erano etruschi questo ti dice tutto.
After long time❤
Do Tocharian & Yuezhi ( Kushan ) Genetics next time
Do we have DNA samples kf kanishq and other Kushans
Afanasievo + west siberian = tocharian
BMAC @@Scythian_nomad
Torkarian Just like a Perman peoples (not german its perman) or Senglish peoples (not english)
YUE Cİ / TU EZİ THİS TWO PRONUNCE MEANİNG "TURKİSH" İN THE CANTONESE AND MANDARİN DİALECT
YUE Cİ MEANİNG İS GUY WİTH BİG DİCK AT THE OLD CHİNESE LANGUAGE
TORKAR TURKER VS THOSE ALL İS BULSHİT!
KUŞ HAN = EAGLE KİNG MEANİNG İS THİS İN THE TURKİSH LANGUAGE
@@Scythian_nomad75% ANE + 25 BAIKAL EMBLA = TOCHARIAN
This is fascinating. Interesting how quite often ancestry and language don't necessarily line up with each other. I know the Celtic speaking peoples also had quite wide variation in their genetic makeup, as do pretty much all the different Indo-European speaking language branches.
It is just very simple! The time 900-800 is already too late, the Yamnaia had already spread everywhere in continental Europe. That is the reason for the mixed ancestry of the Etruscan. So before the Indo-european migration, in Europe, there were largely cultures and languages related to Anatolia! The Etruscan had managed to maintain (like other people in Southern Europe: pre-Greek Minoans, pre-Latin Sardinians, Basques, Pelasgian etc.) their ancient pre-indoeuopean language (check Minoan and Sardinian DNA ancestry for confirmation where island people maintained longer their pre-indoeuropean culture). So yes the Etruscans are autochthonous, in comparison to the newer steppe waves from NE-Europe, but linked to earlier migrations from Anatolia (before 3000 BC).
The graphics in this video are excellent and make the argument clear.
Actually the Etruscan language has been mostly deciphered and many inscriptions can be read with a high degree of confidence. We just don't have that many inscriptions so the language as a whole, and its origins are still mysterious.
Also despite the way the NBA team pronounces it "Celtic" is said with a hard C so it would sound like "Keltic" rather than the soft C way you pronounced it.
Ancient Greek word for barbarian was keltoii so yes, hard K.
It has not actually been deciphered. It can be read because it is written in Greek. But we cannot understand what the inscriptions say.
@@DemetriosKongas We can understand 70-85% of what we have. Mostly it is burial and dedicatory inscriptions. We just don't have a lot and most of what we have are only a few words, like [name] son of [name] left this offering for his father. We can read that, and we know because sometimes that was written in Etruscan and Latin. It's just some of the most interesting stuff we can't read well.
@@jillscott4029 is there a separate word for son? Or is it gauged from some ending of the patronymic?
@@DemetriosKongas So there IS a separate word for son but in the example I gave and in that context it is indeed gauged from a patronymic suffix.
Welcome back!
The word “Celt” is pronounced with a kappa, as it is from the Greek word “Keltoi”, meaning “brooch”, a characteristic pin that held their great kilts together in position. Only the Boston basketball team pronounces it as the narrator did, with a soft ‘c’.
Bollocks. Glasgow Celtic FC.
Lots of words pronounced with a K-sound in ancient Greek are pronounced with an S-sound today, such as Cyprus, Cyrus, Cyrene, citron, cycle, centre, cenotoph, centaur, encephalitis, etc. so that's not a good argument!
The killt is a modern probably holywoodian invention. No Kelt has ever used ridiculous kilts.
Yes, it originally must have been. But you missed 'Celtic', the traditionally Irish-Catholic football club of Glasgow.
@@ChrisShortyAllen A football club vs every other usage of the word, hmm. Maybe in certain sports clubs but irl, in history, in education, in archaeology, in art, in everyday language - it is with hard 'c'.
That’s my Etruria ❤
Rasena
The fact that Etruscans have descendants doesn't mean they're not extinct.
Those descendants don't speak Etruscan, do they?
He remembered channel's password😂
😂
I saw the name Myheritage on the DNA results being shown there at the end.
I was born in Germany of a German mother from an old German farm family.
My heritage says I'm 59% English, 28% Italian (mostly Greek Italian, or southern Italian), and Bulgaran and Scandinavian.
When I asked why they would say English, they said it was because of the Anglo-Saxon invasion of England.
That was 1500 years ago, and I wasn't born in England.
I don't believe they know what they are doing.
Yes, it is possible that this happens, this happens because there is shared Autosomal DNA and it is likely that your Haplogroups are associated with the invasion of the Anglo-Saxons, which gives you a bad assignment, but in genetic terms you are still very similar to these peoples. Agriculture in Europe came from a group of humans called Anatolian Farmers, these mixed with the Hunter Gatherers, giving rise to the European Farmers (more similar to the Sardinians of Italy), these European Farmers expanded throughout Europe, the Southern Germany is characterized by having higher levels of European Farmers or Anatolian DNA, some of your DNA can be assigned as "Italian".
Germans and English people share 99% genetic similarities, only 1% difference.
@@Haijwsyz51846 The English have 50% admixture with Celtic peoples native to the British Isles
@Haijwsyz51846 This may well be true, but if one is born in Germany of a German mother from an old German family, then you are German, not English.
@@user-yt3xd2jl6d English people are the so called Anglo Saxons. They are a Germanic people. Scots and Welch probably are half Celtic and half English. Look up the genetic heritage program by National Geographic.
It depends on what the primary data is. For example, the Philistines in their last centuries of existence were mostly Canaanites (as DNA). Those from the beginning had European DNA, probably Greek, and were assimilated over time, although they kept their initial cultural imprint.
Great presentation. Proud to know more about my Italian ancestry when watching this video and comparing it to my mom's family DNA results (uncle/her brother had R1B DNA, high genetic affinity match to Tuscany and Emilia-Romagna (Etruscan territory) despite her family being from Southern Italy (probably descendants of Etrucan-Italic settlers that migrated into Southern Italy during Roman expansion).
Finaly, can you please make a video on illiryan genetics
I explained Ilyrians genetics. Ilyrians started with I2 haplogroup like Novak Djokovic. He is of I2 haplogroup, a European Paleolitic haplogroup. This hapligroup still live among Serbs but in small amount. In European Mesolithe, I2a1 was developed, and it descended from I2 haplogroup. This haplogroup was spread all over Europe. These Mesolithic Europeans I2a1 were Hanter Gatherers. They lived in caves and close to forests to hunt animals. When Neolithic Farmers came to Europe, these Mesolithic Hanter Gatheres were pushed away from the forests . Neolithic Farmers used to clear the forests. Part of I2a1 left the rivers because the rivers' bad sides were invaded by Neolithic Farmers carriers of G2a haplogroup. This haplogroup was from Caucasus. and it was the haplogroup of Basques forefathers, and it is dominant in Osetians muslimised Gorgians. In some areas, like in the Brithish Islands, these two populations were cooperating, but in other areas , they didn't . Mesolithic Europeans were endangered when ancestors of today Westerners came to Europe from Yamnaya Culture. On their way from East Steps to West Europe and Atlantic Coast, they killed all Mesolithic and Neolithic men on their ways. They reduced the number of Mezolithic and Neolithic men 12 X times. I2a1 and G2a haplogroups were eradicated from west and central Europe. I2a1 moved to Dinaric and Karpathic mountain chanes. Part of I2a1 moved to the East or Panonian Plato, where they joined the R1a haplo group in Arians movement. They turned to Iranian Plato or Caspian Plato farther to North India and riched North East Asia. They mixed with Mongolian fimales and gave the rise to R1a1 Tatars' main hapligroup. So Tatars usually have read or copper or ginger beard but biased eyes. Loo for today Tatars in Rusia, in Tatarstan, in Kyrgiez and Uzbek and in Afganistan Hazars or Azars. You will see the race that d3velope burned out of Slavs men and Mongolian women. Part of I2a1 that was saved moving to the mountains range will give rise to new younger Mesolithic haplogroup I2a2 . This haplogroup is named Dinaric Danubian and grouped in Mesolithic European haplogroup. I2a1 only survived in Sardinia. 37% of men in Sardinia are of I2a1 haplogroup. 67% of men in Balkan have I2a2 haplogroup. They just appeared to confront Romans in time when Romamns attacked Ilyrians. Ilyrians were defited, and most men withdrew to Panonian Plato again.
@@ashlyirvyn2917 thank you a lot, but do you know some illyrian fisycal features like hair colour, eye colour...
@danebajrovic8021
Yes, I do. Serbs and other South Slavs men are tall, stamina, broad bult, long face, brown green eyes, light brown hair (like Aleksandar Macedonian). They are good in tenice, soccer ball, bascet ball.Famous soccer players. Zlatan Ibrahimovic, is a typical Ilyrians looking man. He is from Bosna but lives in Sweden, Novak Djokovic, which is another typical Ilirian. Bascet balls player Jokic, Doncic and more. They are typical examples of Ilyrians' men. After Ilyrians were defited in Ilyrian revolt lead by Bato(n) by Roman Empire, one part of men left Ilyricume and moved to Panonian Plato. Another part of Ilyrians stayed in the Roman Empire. Illyrians were recognized as Romans citizens. Good-looking and brave Ilyrians were a part of the Horse Riding Elit the Unit, the part of the Roman Empire Army. They were elite Horse Riding Unit in the Romans Army. 20 Romans Emperors were of Ilyrians origine(find in Google their names). One of the most recognised and accepted by locals the native people in Balkan was Constantin I the Grate, who accepted Christianity as state religion to preserve the Romans Army operability. Many Romans' army soldiers were of Christian's fathes. Example: St. Georgius the Winer was of noble origin and highly ranked Romans' Empire officer. He was behaded by Emperor Dioclecian, who was also of Ilyrians' origine.
No, he can. Despite official genetic facts displayed in European Genetic pages, Westetners continue to belittle genetic facts and continue with lies that South Slavs are of Slavic origin. South Slavs have from 10% R1a among Bulgarians to 35 % R1a among Slovenians, but generaly South Slavs are dominantly I2a2 Mesolithic Europeans. Slavic language replaced the original Mesolithic language of the Mesolitic indigenous people in Balkan. This original Mesolithic language was similar to Sanscrit . Mesolithic ancestors of today Slavs moved twice to the East, they mixed with Slavs and came back with more Slavic language. Russions take South Slavic language as hard in pronacianion, having a lot of cononsonats. 9000 BC arrived Slavs R1a on Danube River. Ther is naratives among West Slavs confirming that they have roots 8n Danubian Slavs. Slavs never attacked Mesolithic ancestors of today South Slavs dominantly of I2 haplogroup. Westerners, who came from Yamnnaya Culture to Europe 3500 yeras BC desimated old Mesolithic and Neolithic Europeans. Yamnnaya killers, genocide old Europeans. They reduced the number of Mesolithic and Neolithic men 12X.
@@kenwood2682
Neolithic farmers did not have or carry J2a haplogroup. They were and still are of G2a haplogroup dominant in Ossetian people. I admire one Ossetian song, because this song was accepted and survived in Balkan among Serbs ancestors who met Anatolian Farmers. Ancestors of Serbs, from Lepenski Vir Culture did not join Neolithic Farmers, because they have destroyed the environment along rivers by clearing forests, where ancestors of the Serbs had lived.The ancestors of Serbs had to retreat a deeper into the mountains of Dinaric and Carpathian ranges. They still were, hunters and gatherers, and depend on forests for survival. A quiet number of toponemus in Balkan are given by Neolithic Farmers, like Bosna, Una and some more. Neolithic Farmers were not from Anatolia but Caucasus. They reached Balkan going around Black lake today Black Sea. They walked along the Danube river bed, on foot and reached central Europe and spread around Europe even reaching British Islands. They were the part of Megalithic and Stonehenge Culture. They were exterminated by R1b men from Yamnaya culture who arrived in Irone Age to Europe and killed on their way all Mesolithic and Neolithic men. Only in Monte Negro and Greece still live 6% of G2a similar conc is in Italy and Iberia. This haplogroup with E- V13 Meditheranian haplogroup were the part of Ancient Greeks. Today Greeks from Anatolia have not understood the language of these really Ancient People wrongly named by British historians for political reasons Ancient Greeks. Anatolian Greeks Hellens are not descendants of ancient Greeks. Greeks Anatolians J2a declared these native people "😤barbarians". Of this haplogroup was STALJIN. He was Ossetian. Ossetians have 55% of G2a and Georgians 30%. Of this haplogroup is Erdogan the President of Turkey. Cheers!! Dtop 🛑 propaganda pushing Shqiptarete Greeks from South Italy who carry like Greeks J2a haplogroup as 🤥 Ilyrians, but Shqiptarete are fake Ilyrians.
This is like West Virginia and Kentucky arguing who's more hillbilly.
I won't be the last one to comment that "This "background" music might be okay for the tourists' dinner, but it INTERFERES with the narration, which is what people want to hear! For Heaven's sake, ignore the "RULE" that EVERY video MUST have "background music" whether it is really in the Background or really Music. It spoils the entire video, which is actually very good.
Thank you. I have sensory and had to stop watching because the music made me so anxious!
They should also try and convince the AI to pick a _single_ pronunciation for the word _Etruscan._ I know it's a content mill and they can't afford a _real_ human narrator, but come on. This is barely beyond phone menu narration quality.
Glad you're back! Also why did you took down the viking in skara video?
Hey, nice to have you back.
Can you make a video about ancient assyrians?
for elder people, like me the background music? is were distracting and troublesome , please skip , I could not follow the story.
It was annoying that music,
Three peoples gradually moved to Italy due to wars and famine.
Trojans.Turuk.Kumuk.
They all spoke the same language because they were relatives.
The Trojans became kings and Turuk and Kumuk became city builders.
The Kumyk tribe Tark are city builders; it’s in their blood from birth. They founded the second Tarquinia in the Caucasus. The most amazing thing is that they still use the Jug symbol. This symbol was used in the past by the Romans, borrowed from the Etruscans. It was not for nothing that the Huns built their capital among the Kumuk people in New Tarquinia in the Caucasus and moved to Europe.
There are many similarities in the details of some figures (eyes, beards, clothes) to the Vinca figures, some scientists also suggest similarity of written words and meanings
Exactly!!! The Vinca culture was associated with the Italic tribes who lived in the Balkans for thousands of years before migrating to Italy.
You should do a dedicated video like this on the ancient Egyptians using samples: Egyptian Old Kingdom Period Gizeh:I6409, Egyptian Old Middle Kingdom Period Dahshur:I10020 and JK2134. I'll leave it up to you if you'd add Djehuty-Nakht I6130 and Nakht-Ankh as I hear that Djehuty may have contamination.
Those samples haven't been published yet.
@@ario2264 I thought if G25 coordinates were produced for a given sample then the sample would be published.
In resume: Etruscans are italian
No!!
Etruscan are kazakhs
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisboratthey dont even care 1% east asian blood, how can they be turkic?
@@postachamdi6286 kazakh aren't Turkic.
They are Mongols by origin and by Haplotype.
But Etruscan are kazakh
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat No, Etruscans were Amazigh, North African!!!
@@izemrasenchenini No sir.
They were Mongoloid kazakhs.
Possible scythian connection in regard to the 1/3 steppe ancestry?
No, the Etruscans had completely different uniparental markers than the Scythians. The Etruscans were mostly R1b U152. like the Latins.
No the eastern Celtic people were there at the behest of a ruler who needed warriors and so gave them land in the modern Turkey. They caused a problem there ultimately
Steppe ancestry in Italy was actually brought by Proto-Italic speakers
They found the best piece of land in all of southern Europe
Kelts. „K“ / at 6:38 starts the conclusion
Can you re upload Hittite genetics?
My interest in them began when I saw funeralary objects. They seemed to have a really good sense of humor, even about death.
Very much like the Greeks, in their political structure.
The Etruscans came from Lemnos islands in modern Greece
@@kenwood2682 {Very interesting. Thanks.
@@kenwood2682 scholars actually think the opposite, that in Lemnos they came there from Italy. The DNA tests of the Etruscans support this; the Etruscans have uniparental markers more similar to European populations in the Alps than to those in the Aegean.
Thanks for coming back, your content is awesome 👍🏼
We missed your videos
In Bulgaria we have runi before linear 1and 2 and Varna culture 7 thousand years
The Basques also have predominantly R1b. The hypothesis that R1b is Indo-European is doubtful.
In human genetics, haplogroup I (M170) is a haplogroup of the Y chromosome. It is characteristic of the hunter-gatherer populations of the Upper Paleolithic and the European Mesolithic, before the arrival on the continent of Neolithic farmers, then of Indo-Europeans. .
But I can't seem to find any information about mitochondrial DNA. Because everywhere the invading soldiers are men who massacre men and marry women. The Basques, for example, are almost 100% Indo-European on the men's side and 10% pre-Indo-European on the women's side.
In the Canary Islands 20% of Guanche mitochondrial DNA has been transmitted.
@@chatonmignon8724 As far as I know you can’t find fossilized Y haplogroup I (I 1 and I 2;) in Europe before the arrival of agriculture. My guess is haplogroup I came from the Balkans through Hungary to the north (with continental farmers) and R1b came with the migration of farmers around the Atlantic coast (Atlantic farmers). Really Indo-European is only R1a.
Bashkir dominant y DNA is R1b with the main subclade u152, which is found in Latin and Etruscans, the Bashkir are not indo european but turkic people
You obviously did not do well at school.
Basque may very well be indoeuropean. Jackson Crawford has something interesting about this on his channel.
Celts is pronounced Kelts not Selts. Anyone making a video about ancient times should take care with pronunciation. Having said that I was impressed with this video's presentation.
We have a football team called Celtic pronounced with a soft C
@@carolmarr6607 Yes, the Celtic football team in Glasgow and other teams around the world us the soft C. The Iron Age Celts had a hard C. I think it was the Ancient Greeks who gave them their name and they used the hard pronunciation.
So they were just Italian in the end 😵
Italians are part etruscans not the other way around
@@Jondoe297.. Sure
Etruscans are slavic people form the Balkans, their language is slavic and genetics,
@@bijelimedved2983 slavic people didn´t exist yet for a looooong time
@@bavariancarenthusiast2722 that is wester propagannda….. slavs are the original europions
It is compelling that there is a connection to ancient Iberian people of Spain. Another non-Indo-European culture with written languages that defy translation.
Archaeologist think different. They say may Etruscans come from Lesbos and Anatolia.Their alphabet is similar to the Greek as they took it from the Greek colonies of.Southern Italy.The truth is we don't know a lot about the Etruscans
Most probably they got their language from Anatolian Neolithic farmers, most probably the g2 haplogroup paternal Ancestry which bocome less prominent after arrival of Steppe herders was responsible for it , the headers was unable to assimilate them ...
That seems crazy, italic peoples a branch of invading indo europeans take on italy various tribes settle, all of them except the Etruscans keep on an Indo-European language, usually invaders impose their language, i guess if one thinks about it, not that insane, the major one i am thinking of is the Anglo-Saxon invasion imposing their language on the native britons, or the aryans in india.... Smaller invaders usually end up adopting the native language, think normans and the english, but the dna suggests here that the etruscans a large similar invading group to other italic tribes adopted some autochthonous language
it is not crazy at all, there are numerous examples of non-Indo-European languages in Europe attested with Iron Age inscription: besides Etruscan, there is Rhaetic, Camunian, the language of the Novilara stele, perhaps the Sican language, the Basque language, the Aquitan language, the Iberian language...
@@anonimoantropomorfo5710 I am completely aware of non Indo-European languages in Europe, just how they remained there is somewhat shocking I'm trying to articulate, like I said usually the dominating people/culture, for example the Anglo-Saxons impose their language on the natives, Britons, but the Etruscans, an italic tribe, adopted apparently a native language instead of keeping their own, I guess like as if the Norman invasion was quite larger in terms of populace settling in Anglo-Saxon Britain, but also eventually adopting English entirely.... That happened for them but they were a much smaller populace than I would guess the italic tribe that the Etruscans originated from....
@@AlexanderEBott the Etruscans are like the case of the Basques, from a linguistic point of view (this is a parallel that does not imply that the Etruscan and Basque languages were related), and the Etruscans were genetically quite similar to the Latins. The Etruscans did not adopt any new language, as in the case of the Basques, a much older language survived in the Etruscans, spoken since at least the Chalcolithic period, despite the fact that the Etruscans (as well as the Basques) received Indo-European language migrations in the same quantities as those received by the Latins (the DNA says this). Thus, in the Etruscans there was no language shift as occurred in the Latins. it is very likely that both Etruscan and an Indo-European language coexisted in Etruria during the Prehistory (as will also have happened in the prehistory of the Latins), only that in Etruria the older language will survive into the Iron Age.
The Normans are a different kind of example that has nothing to do with Etruscans or Basques. There are no examples in British history to help you understand. Also because they are all examples from medieval times. While the Etruscans are a people between Protohistory and the beginning of History.
I agree! The studies have shown no trace of admixture with non Indo Europeans especially from Anatolia/Aegean islands
65% similar to mine results , welcome back Decimali
I wonder how many people in Tuscany today have Etruscan ancestors?
the Etruscans were not only settled in Tuscany but in an area much larger than present-day Tuscany that ranged from the southernmost areas of Lombardy and Veneto, included large parts of Emilia-Romagna, Umbria, and more than half of Latium.
Okay. So they are from the areas where we found their remains and artifacts. What incredible genetic insight. This inspired me to do some genetic testing on the bread in my pantry and I was shocked to discover it is made out of various grains. This changes everything we know about bread.
they came from the Balkan Peninsula and were Pelasgians by origin
Keep uploading regulary my friend
The word "Celt" is always pronounced with a hard C - as were all Latin words. So we say 'KELT' today, never 'SELT'... Unless perhaps for branding. We do use the soft C for modernised Latin names like Caesar and Cicero (Which would have sounded more like 'KEEZAR' and 'KIKERO'). Also, philologists really do not know that the Etruscans did not speak an Indo-European language. They couldn't possibly know! All we do know is that at some point the Etruscans adapted the ancient Greek alphabet to represent and record something, and that is simply not enough info to conclude anything. For all we know Latin itself is just a Creole of Greek and Etruscan. And who needed those DNA results to find out that early Etruscan genes would be spread across Gaul, Spain, Italia, and Corsica. Gee, what a shock!
They were all Illyrian, Dardan, Hittites, Phrygs , Lydians, Tokarians, Ligurians, Messapians, Umbrians, Venetians etc.
Etruscan language has been included into indoeuropian languages from Norbert Jokl before World War Two.
Finaly you are back❤
So you start saying that Etruscans came from north of Black Sea (Slavs) and then proceeded to list Spanish, French, Latin similarities. Are you whitewashing the history? Why in their name is Rus (Russian)? Are you erasing the Russian / Slavic connection? You did not say anything about the words they used, just a little Cyrillic letters, which are not only Greek but Russian too. Ah well. another fairy tail with an artificial voice. Why not include Russian genes for comparison, or is this like the 2024 Olympics excluding an entire ethnic group??
He's back!
Cyprus.
Interesting and thanks. Did not guess about the Iceman connection. I've heard that the Roman "Games" were derived from the Etruscan's religious beliefs, the same might be said about the BCE Roman views of their afterlife. PBS, inference, and gossip? Sort of. Thanks again, a lot of effort in this clip.
If the Etruscans were a small population, the majority Italian genes presently could just be a process of merging with Etruscans.
The Turkish origins theory with the steppe genetics of 30% needs to be investigated more.
Etruscans moved to Toscana N Italy from Southern Albanian region Tosca, there they adapted their own rare subdialect.
Gibberish
Tipica ipotesi pan-illirica senza fondamento storico.
Please make itil bulgarian DNA analysis. Welcome back
Many ancient dna from Bulgaria are deleted on Gedmatch, I don't know the reason. You can find lots of ancient dna from Romania or Hungary. I guess ancient inhabitants of Bulgaria was very close to autochthonous people in Hungary before the uralic people settled down to Hungary. Nowadays the mixture of modern Bulgarians and Hungarians are different. Also the genetic and language influence of Proto Bulgarians to the autochthonous people in Bulgaria was very few. I think because of Proto Bulgarians the slavic language becomes more dominant and the one of the oldest inhabitants of Bulgaria the thracian people getting assimilated from slavic speakers. Maybe the slavic speakers was important to expand the Proto Bulgarian army to split from the Byzantine empire, because it was Byzantine territory before.
@@aktayturan9272 Are today's Bulgarians a combination of all these tribes? I am also curious about the origin of Pomaks. I would appreciate it if you could give an explanation on this subject.
Türküm :) Türkce kullansanız benim için daha kolay olur
@@lotuslumuhallebi Tabi. Bulgaristan hakkında neden meraklısın? Sen oradan mı geliyorsun?
@@aktayturan9272 Evet. Ailemin bir kısmı oradan göç etmiş. (Yukarı Cuma ve Dobruca Bölgesinden). Ailemde Pomak olanlar da varmıs.
It is said that the Etruscan alphabet more closly resembles Coelbren and if you read the 'white goddess' by Robert Graves he unearthed ancient texts that showed the ancient Greeks ventured to Britain and asked the Druids if they can use some of the Coelbren alphabet for their own alphabet they were developing.
Etruscan alphabet has greek letters like sigma and omega, it's clear they came for Aegean Isla
@@kenwood2682 I suppose thats why no one can translate Etruscan... because it has greek letters... lol
Lemnian men were migrating there to escape from the Amazons btw.
Etruscans had similar civilisation with Greeks and came to Italy from the east of Italy
Before the Bronze Age, Europeans were the descendants of hunter-gatherers and farmers who arrived in the Neolithic. They spoke their own language. In the Bronze Age, Indo-Europeans from the Eastern European steppe became the majority in Northern Europe. In the north, the Indo-European language was spread. In southern Europe, the Latins, who were also Indo-European, spread the Latin language among the indigenous Europeans. Basque, Etruscan, Hungarian, Finnish are not Indo-European languages, but ancient languages.
Before Romans Celts went around and they were also Indo European. From Spain to Anatolia Celts were everywhere
@@kristijangrgic9841 The R1b haplogroup is the gene marker of Yamnaya shepherds and the main gene of later Celts. It is the most common in Western Europe today. In Central and Southern Europe, descendants of Neolithic farmers are more typical.
@@jozsefvadon3086 Sono Italiano e sono R1b U-152 (l’aplogruppo più dominante in Italia)
@@Ajemone Gallia Cisalpiná, spread of Hallstatt and La Tène cultures. And in the Roman period, Celtic slaves, and later Celtic immigration. Southern Italy has more Neolithic ancestors.
They forgot the other half of the population! matriarchal DNA is different! He is not Indo-European. The men invaded the territory, killed the men and married the women. This is what happened in the Canary Islands. The conquistadors killed the Guanche men or sent them as slaves to America and married the women. The DNA is Indo-European on the male side but Berber on the female side.
Very interesting content. But...
The "background" music is far too loud.
It's very distracting and makes it difficult to follow the content.
Theodore Mommsen's History of Rome is worth reading.
You didn't really show where etruscans came from you showed how they spread through Roman influence.
They were indigenous Italians with an infusion of Steppe peoples who spoke a non Indo-European language, whose modern descendants still live in northern Italy, parts of Spain, Corsica, etc.; and despite the language difference, they were closely related (cousins) you the ancient Romans, who did speak an Indo-European language.
It's all pretty clear.
@@tripwire8457 not quite. The video fails to mention that the Etruscans' one of the main ancestral components, namely the Early European Farmers, migrated from Anatolia 2000 years before the Indo-Europeans arrived in Europe. They were as indigenous to Europe as the Romans and Celtics were. Herodotus' theory is correct.
@@gwynbleidd_doethbleidd nope, Herodotus was certainly not talking about the Early European Farmers, about whom he knew nothing. Herodotus was wrong, for many reasons, because all modern and ancient Europeans have among their ancestors the Early European Farmers, not just the Etruscans, because the EEF values found in the Etruscans are similar to those found in the Latins, Celto-Iberians, and other southern European populations, and because the DNA of the Early European Farmers decreased in Anatolia before the rise of Anatolian people. The Lydians and the Anatolian peoples of the Iron Age were different genetically from Neolithic populations, coming from a completely different branch of the Indo-Europian languages, which had not arisen from Yamnaya, and the Lydians and the rest of the Anatolian peoples have in their genetic make-up influences typical of the eastern Mediterranean, something also found in the Minoans and Mycenaeans, but which was completely absent in the Etruscans who were instead entirely similar genetically to the Latins. Those who show affinity with the Lydians, Lycians, Carians, and Luvians... are the Greeks themselves instead.
@@anonimoantropomorfo5710 but you disregard the fact:
1) that the Lycians, Luvians and other Bronze Age Anatolians are for the most part Neolithic Anatolians genetically and linguistically assimilated by the Indo-Anatolians - who are themselves Indo-Europeans. They wouldn't show identical genetic affinity with the Minoans, of course. The Mycenaeans were also Indo-European-related.
2) that the Etruscans had lived hundreds of years alongside the Italic-speaking people. It is only natural they influenced each others' genetic makeup over time.
Take the Indo-European DNA component from the Etruscans and you just get the Early European Farmers. It doesn't make sense that they would be related to other ethnicities when you don't see any other DNA components in their genetics.
@@gwynbleidd_doethbleidd Lycians, Luvians and other Bronze Age Anatolians have had nothing to do with the Etruscans. Indo-Europeans means nothing, because Indo-Euro languages in Anatolia did not come from Yamnaya culture. The idea of the Etruscan mystery and origin from the Lydians are myths that survive at the popular level, fed into social media by people with no training in these topics. By now there is maximum consensus that the one reported by Herodotus was a completely invented tradition.
Great Stuff! Please follow up with the people of the Po Valley (5,000 BC) and the Steppe people migrations, eg the Beaker people.
Ancient astronaut theorists contend that the Etruscans...
👽
Music is too loud. Distracting.
Etruscan history is just like Turkish history. 1000 years ago Original Turks came from Central Asia to today's Turkey. Turks were warriors and they established many states. Turkish people's population was less than other people who were living in those lands. But because of being the leading ethnic group, Turks assimilated others and the modern Turkish nation of Turkey born. Despite the fact that the original Turks came from Central Asia, Central Asian Turkish dna is minor in the genes of today's modern Turks. Long story short : The founders of the Etruscans were steppe people just like the Turks, they came to ancient Italy as conquerors. They ruled over the local people and by the time they assimilated them, taught their language to the locals and created the Etruscan nation.
Τhe Etruscans were GREEKS. Their alphabet is Greek. The Anatolians & Limnians were and are GREEKS.
You can make one from Bachi Kiro Cro-magnon?
The same thing happen to the modern humans. We’d expect that turks have Central Asian DNA 🧬 but after testing them the results are that they are just local people, resembling their greek neighbors. It is believed that Etruscans came in Italian peninsula from other areas of Europe or even from Western Asia. It is a known fact that they spoke a foreign language to their italic and celtic neighbors but it turns out that just like modern hungarians and turks they are just locals that spoke the language of those who conquered their ancestors.
What are you talking about ?
Turks have 15 to 20% asian DNA
The seljuks did assimilate some people and rape others
Why it is not even mentioned what language they spoke? They spoke an aggultinative language just like all people we know of predating the Indo-European invasion. The Basques, the Saami, the Finns, the Hungarians, Turkic peoples and the Minoans, basically these people cover the entire European continent.
Finally the R1b is NOT Indo-European but Scythian and Scythians were also of mixed ethnicitiy.
Yes indeed, Indo-Europeans weren't steppe people at this time, nor later, hahaha! If they were, they were just fleeing from the Scythians, later Huns, and Hungarians. They didn't conquer anything.
,,the Finns, the Hungarians and Turkic peoples'' ..they
have nothing to do with Etruscans (or even Europe)
@@geluurs8235 The so-called "indo-europeans" even less. LMAO their language isn't even European, as it was pointed out in the video and many comments. They're just invaders who stole the culture of Etruscans and Minoans. But of course they all use a version of the nomadic suit and boots and shoes, not the Greek tunica or Roman toga.
@@geluurs8235 Since my original comment was deleted by some 1984 "fan", lets try again: Quite the opposite. As the OP pointed out, agglutinative languages are the European ones. The so-called "indo-europeans" who invaded Europe MUCH later, don't even speak a European language.
@@tomigun5180 Don't be so sure. Please research the Asena legend. (the legend of the origin of the Turks)
It is incredibly similar to the myth of the origin of the Etruscans. Their language has not yet been fully deciphered. I carry Anatolian DNA. But I'm Turkish. There are dozens of documents proving that the people who came from the conquest of Istanbul by Fatih the Conqueror are the grandchildren of the Trojans. and the famous words of the conqueror: I have avenged the Trojans. It just takes a little more time
I nearly passed by this video because I thought you were going to argue Etruscans were Africans, as “scholars” now argue the African-origins theory for the British (Chedder man), Ptolemies (Cleopatra), Samurai, and Central Americans (Olmec stone heads). I’m glad I watched.
Scholars dont actualy argue this, internet trolls do. Ancient European Hunter Gatherers are considered to be swarthy but had blue eyes.
So basically you're saying that you are a racist bigot.
Unfortunately, the background music interferes with hearing the commentary. It's amazingly silly to use this overlaying music.
More DNA manipulation to achieve a preconceived conclusion 🤷♂️
We waz Etruscans 😅.lurking
Sumerian
Khazar
Macedonian (Hellenistic Period)
Vizigot
Andalus (Islamic Spain)
Byzantine Anatolia
Ottoman Turk
Turkic languages have nothing to do with Europe and western Asia
@@majidbineshgar7156I think those are suggestions for future videos.
@@bossschmutzfink9865 OK , thank you for your kind clarification.
@@majidbineshgar7156Really? Why does Etruscan have the same grammar system as Hungarian, Finnish and the Turkic languages? They’re all agglutinative
@@julesD0222 The languages of primitive Amazonian indigenous tribes and many Sub-Saharan African languages are also agglutinative , but they have no connection to Finnish, Hungarian, Sumerian ... at all, your argument is more of a Syllogistic fallacy as "Andamanese peoples speak agglutinative languages , Finnish people speak agglutinative language too , Andamanese peoples are black , therefore Finish people must be black too " , just check the list of agglutinative languages you will see that most primitive peoples used to speak or still speak agglutinative languages without having been racially related .
Interesting video but the background music was so loud and irritating that I had to mute the sound and read the subtitles.
Etruscan lived together Hun scytian and Celtic in middle Europe. This is fact way you ignore this history.
I believe the Bashkir ancestors also lived in central Europe as they carry R1b-u152 just like the Etruscans
R1B 💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
İndo-Europeans 🗿
@@polatism1
R1b это не только индоевропейцы, это также много других групп
I’m Italian and R1b U-152
@@Scythian_nomad indo europeans spread it the most.
R1B is inferior haplogroup
the indiginous ppl of italy which originated the original Roman culture = with turkic dna ❤
Ummm, the individual and other sample information carry nothing related to Turkic DNA, but ok
@@izemrasenchenini no dna just does match with anatolia and the caucasus
@@izemrasenchenini also a north american indian tribe with a gene only they and turks have, you know that indian headgear with feathers and the shamanic faith, word similarities, tent making all identical with preislam turks, but some things are just not talked about
@@ZionistWorldOrder DNA matches with Anatolia and Caucasus literally means they are not Turkic lol, you just debunked yourself, and as you can infer from the video, they never had a modicum of Turkic admixture.
there are no genes that only Turkic and American tribes have in common, there are plenty of Siberian tribes that ain't of Turkic origin have those genes as well, such as Ngassans and Chukchis. Same goes for the tents, non-Turkic East Siberians have those tents as well, feather thing also used among Mongol and Tungusic peoples, shamanic faith exclusive to ain't nobody, every animistic faith ended up as shamanic, lots of people have and had that belief.
They had been present in America even before the Turkic peoples originated. They have a common ancestor, but no, they ain't the same.
@@izemrasenchenini my lengthy amswer got lost, not all indians just one tribe, with too many similarities, religion to linguistic to weaving patterns etc the tribe itself denies us but the turkish gov have been sending researchers and delegations for decades.. its is the same turks in siberia to korea that crossed over. We all call ourselves turk and speak the same language, i can go from bosnia to the chinese wall greeting people with the same turkic hello. Kazakh Kirgiz Turkmen Ozbek all turk.
Thanks, AI narrator!
Do you think that somebody can analyze DNA with a microscope as shown in your video?
They were Turkic! Their called itself "Asena" not rasenna! Asena name of Mother Wolf feeding to two Baby Brothers who "OnOgur and Oğuz" What a similar with Romus Romulus story huh?!
ALL EUROPEAN WRONG HISTORICAL BOOKS WILL BE CHANGE SOMEDAY!
also the name of the Etruscan Goddess of Love is Turan!1!1111!!!!!!!
bro the video literally proves that they ain't no Turkic, what the hell on earth you on about💀cultures can show similarities, A LOT of cultures do. that ain't adequately enough to prove your point.
and as for the name, they referred themselves as "rasenna", nothing to do with "asena", that word didn't even exist back then lmao xD
I concur with this conclusion, etruscans were from the steppe, from caucasus, indo european, just every word meaning turkic but cant say it outright.. ❤ the wolfmother Romus Romulus it all adds up. Roman culture originated with these small indiginous people in Italy.
@@ZionistWorldOrder Darling we have thousand of thousand con ettion with Turchi Peoples. We also Turkish. Lol
@@izemrasenchenini Hey Bro thank you for repllying and sharing your informations.
İ agree with you But in this case little bit different.
There are hundreds of words that are common between the Turski language and Kok-Turkish.
Moreover, DNA analysis revealed genetic matching with Turkic people in dozens of Turkic remains that share the same haplogroup with Chuvash and Tatar Turks and Shekeli Hungarians.
It's not just about "She-Wolf Asena". Turskis called the god Tengri-Tengir-tingir. Likewise, the fact that the "Kurgan", that is, Tumulus style monumental tombs prepared for the afterlife in Turkish belief, and the remains inside them are exactly the same is the most important indicator of their belonging to a culture.
In the "Codex Cumanicum", written in the Middle Ages and mentioning the Cuman Turks, it is written that the Turskis are a common ancestry of the Cuman Turks. Cumans are a people who ruled in the Middle Ages and constitute an important part of today's Hungarians. A significant part of Türkiye's population is descended from the Cumans. Kuman means "Blonde" in Root-Turkish. I am also a Cuman Turk. I am blonde, blue-eyed and almost 2 meters tall.
I am a senior student in Archeology and my field of expertise is Turkish Kurgans and the Alphabets used by the Turks. The Runic alphabet in the Kültikin Inscription and Orkhon Inscriptions, dated to the 4th century, was actually an alphabet developed by the Proto-Turks and used in their Turks.
Likewise, the Normans used this alphabet. If you look at the Norwegian Runic letters, you can see that they all have Turkish names.
You returned good man :D hope to see if it is possible a video about Mountain Caucasian Jews sample, Earlier Kurds, Lurs, Earlier Korean Peninsula people, Avar people (from Dagestan), Tat people (north Iran), Laz people (Turkiye), Khazars (Turkic people), Yayoi people (Japan)
Laz people are Georgians.
@@anakacharava4159 I already know it, but also there are a big community in Turkiye, that is what I mean
Mountain Jews from Dagestan are probably descendants of the khazars
I remember today's Tuscany region is a real hot spot (5%) of Neanderthal DNA.
It's is an old and outdated thesis; all Europeans have Neanderthal DNA.
Albanian language is language etruscian.Dhe një shqiptar i thjeshtë di të lexojë dhe kuptojë gjuhën etruske .mësoni gjuhën shqipe dhe do ngeleni të mahnitur .arvaniti/arbaniti
Albanian gibberish
Mohenzo Daro people of Indus valley migrated to Sumer of the Persian gulf and Etruscana of the Med sea.
It would be interesting to do the DNA on the earliest Romans and if you could find the grave of Romulas, it would be very interesting to see what his DNA was