9 EASY Insider Hacks to Winning Your Case During Cross-Examination
Vložit
- čas přidán 29. 02. 2024
- If you have a domestic violence restraining order hearing or criminal case coming up, including an arrest for domestic violence (PC 273.5), you may be wondering what to expect in when questioned by the opposing attorney. In this video, I will give you 9 EASY insider hacks to winning your case when you are cross examined for your DVRO or PC 273.5 case.
----
/ californiacriminaldefense
/ lawofficesofvtb
/ veronicatbartonesq
👩🏼💼 Looking to hire an attorney? Need help with your case? Call 213-566-3784 or click here: calendly.com/d/3xh-ptg-smv
🎯 Learn how to represent yourself & win your restraining order hearing (EASY) here 👉defeatthedvro.com
🙋 Book a VIP Restraining Order Strategy Session with Veronica: calendly.com/veronicalaw/vip-...
💌 Domestic violence classes? Go here to take them online and get a certificate ASAP: tinyurl.com/domesticviolenceclass
📱 Text message evidence you want to use in your case? This is my favorite text message evidence export program for iPhones: imazing.o67m.net/DKaknj
✅ Criminal case? Start online therapy and get proof ASAP: onlinetherapy.go2cloud.org/SHDi
📃 Disclaimer: Please note that the information on this channel is for entertainment purposes only and is not legal advice. Watching this channel does not form an attorney-client relationship between us. Every case is different. Also, I'm only licensed in California, so if you're in another state, the information on this channel may not apply. Laws and procedure vary by state, so please don't rely on it. This post may contain affiliate links.
thanks for making videos - i wonder how many cases are not necessarily won or lost because the average person is ignorant to the legal process and harm themselves by not knowing how to behave in court, not following their lawyers advice, keeping their emotions in check, and realizing they should speak as little as possible and only say precisely as they are instructed. you are probably right that the plaintiffs emotions lost her case by confusing her emotional pride “your darn right I broke up with him”. vs the reality of them going through multiple break ups - and yet at that moment in time her emotions outweighed her logic and likely was an outburst against her own lawyer’s advice
The advice to answer just yes or no is tricky, because the questioner is using the Maieutic method to lead the person to a specific outcome. Saying just yes or no will help them in this technique.
Very helpful. Thx.
Thank you Veronica. Very helpful indeed.
Very helpful 🙏🏾
Exactly 20 days from now I start my murder trial in California and I’ve been stuck watching these type of videos 😭
Did you do it?
No lie. I started mine yesterday and before anyone asks it was a car accident and I was not at fault
@@Plantmom1 no self defense
@@whozurdaddyva mines got pushed back 3 months from now bro. But I’m sorry to hear that man I hope you beat it and it works out in your favor 🙏🏼🙏🏼
@@Markdaamannn nah it was a car accident and they're trying to say I was impaired by marijuana and that's what makes it (wreck less) murder. The thing is I don't even have an impairment charge wreck less driving or improper lane charge. Just the 2 murder charges and 2 assault on a family member charges because they also got injured in the crash. Shits wild. But thanks bro I hope you beat your charges too
With your last story about the text message, how are you able to get the text message entered into evidence on cross-examination?
Your awesome
I need your help
❤
Always and never
To provide men equal protection under the law (finally) it should be against the law with strict punishment for women to 'provoke domestic violence'. Domestic violence rarely occurs in a vacuum and women do this a LOT more than anyone realizes, often times causing their own injuries, then they call the cops and the guy goes to jail. This is real life.
Provoke domestic violence? How does someone provoke getting hit or choked? I'm 💯 sure whenever he wanted to take his shit out on me that nothing I did provoked nor prevented it from happening. I will say the 1st time I accepted his fake ass apology he considered it permission. Your comment is absurd. Someone who would commit violence on their domestic partner doesn't need provoked, that comment is victim back blame. Shame.