1.000.000.000.000 (1 Billion/Trillion) FPS!!! "Ultra High-Speed Camera" HD

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 13. 02. 2012
  • Full movie!
    1000000000000 (1 Billion/Trillion) FPS!!! Ultra High-Speed Camera (Licht/Light) HD 720p!
    1 Frame = 1.71 picoseconds
    More Informations:
    web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2011/tr... (EN)
    web.media.mit.edu/~raskar/ (EN)
    web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2011/tr... (EN)
    www.golem.de/1112/88379.html (DE)
    Source/Credit:
    1. web.media.mit.edu/~raskar//tri
    2. web.media.mit.edu/~raskar/
    Video: Melanie Gonick
    ...
    My Facebook page:
    / l.h.visualarts
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 4,1K

  • @boxxer221
    @boxxer221 Před 9 lety +690

    With this camera we will be able to see the exact point someone knows they fucked up.

    • @boxxer221
      @boxxer221 Před 8 lety

      ***** heh

    • @marble25
      @marble25 Před 8 lety +1

      +Marc0175 you ruined the joke

    • @akasynergy5504
      @akasynergy5504 Před 8 lety +1

      +boxxer221 XD

    • @harith1794
      @harith1794 Před 8 lety

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @sandrosixarulidze398
      @sandrosixarulidze398 Před 8 lety +6

      +boxxer221 people do not move/react with the speed of light, so to see a facial expression of "shit i fucked up" few thousands of fps will be more than enough.

  • @WilkerAzevedo
    @WilkerAzevedo Před 8 lety +841

    wow!!!! Now we can see Bruce Lee punching!

    • @WilkerAzevedo
      @WilkerAzevedo Před 8 lety +39

      Yes! It is just kidding.

    • @MegaCreamy
      @MegaCreamy Před 8 lety +54

      +Brayan Carmona The fact you made that long ass comment to a joke is troubling.

    • @LOSS444
      @LOSS444 Před 8 lety +19

      +Wilker Acevedo Still wouldn't be fast enough to see Chuck Norris though.

    • @Kabodanki
      @Kabodanki Před 8 lety +8

      +LOSS444 bruce ass raped chuck

    • @ladamyre1
      @ladamyre1 Před 8 lety +1

      +sapher974 ...and he liked it so much he became a Texas Ranger!

  • @smileytattoos1
    @smileytattoos1 Před 9 lety +436

    They should be focused on real science like inventing an invisible sandwich.. so when you eat it everyone thinks you're crazy...

    • @samhouston4326
      @samhouston4326 Před 9 lety +14

      Have you not contacted the US Government? This Administration is handing out money hand over fist for stellar ideas like yours.

    • @samhouston4326
      @samhouston4326 Před 9 lety +10

      Adrian M What? Now you don't be such a Jack's Ass. I am all for invisible sandwiches. I was making a slight towards this irreverent Administration that has bankrupted this Nation and still doling out that dough for stuff that we really don't need to be focusing on. Have you not seen the worthless studies that they have been funding just so some University can make some money? Our Institutions of Higher Learning have become nothing more than businesses that have become idea boxes on how to make money of the next biggest idea.
      Hence the reason that the Fed is demanding that everyone be college educated. The more kids that go to college, the more money colleges make and the more chances that they have at finding the next Thneed. That is not learning. That is not advancing mankind. That is profiteering. Investment in trade schools would serve this Nation much better with skilled labor and provide the People good careers. Somehow, I don't think there is going to be much work at the invisible sandwich factory.

    • @samhouston4326
      @samhouston4326 Před 9 lety +6

      Adrian M You sure are a likable person.

    • @ZoeTheCat
      @ZoeTheCat Před 9 lety

      Yeah, but when they eat those samiches exclusively for a year and still be alive...bitches start believin

    • @socaialschism_works
      @socaialschism_works Před 9 lety +6

      Big Hero 6

  • @Hariboking727
    @Hariboking727 Před 9 lety +254

    We can have a camera that than observe light moving at 186,000 mps, but the police still can't get a clear photo of a criminal at a shopping centre.

    • @NishHammer
      @NishHammer Před 6 lety +9

      Seriously your just trying to be a joker. I mean you don't actually think that way right?

    • @fibergran9
      @fibergran9 Před 6 lety +15

      That's because it's the shopping mall who buys the cameras, not the police

    • @Jt-oj8mk
      @Jt-oj8mk Před 6 lety

      william cann how dumb are you it’s obviously bait and it was from 3 years ago

    • @yamateginga9564
      @yamateginga9564 Před 5 lety

      LOL exposted

    • @sylent7812
      @sylent7812 Před 5 lety +1

      *186,282 mps*

  • @sonofhendrix1618
    @sonofhendrix1618 Před 9 lety +389

    Now film the double slit experiment with that camera. But when nobody's looking.

  • @BenHutchinson321
    @BenHutchinson321 Před 9 lety +11

    That is THE MOST IMPRESSIVE device I've ever seen. It literally lets you see light as it moves! I hope those depictions of what this camera is doing aren't just simulations showing what it will be able to do when it is fully developed, but rather actual video footage taken from the camera. Just curious, HOW do you even make electronics that work fast enough for this, since electric current is limited to moving at the speed of light?

  • @williamarthurfenton1496
    @williamarthurfenton1496 Před 8 lety +39

    Playstation 4 gamers will come here thinking that's the FPS on their next big game.

    • @mvenezian9705
      @mvenezian9705 Před 8 lety +3

      +William Fenton underrated comment

    • @M1RoHigh
      @M1RoHigh Před 8 lety +1

      +William Fenton
      These xbox wouane traumatized players with their limited console at 30fps.
      I'm hurt for you.

    • @adamwatson9112
      @adamwatson9112 Před 8 lety

      That's an understatement.

    • @FluorescentGreen5
      @FluorescentGreen5 Před 8 lety +1

      +John Doe #PCMasterRaceUnite lol

  • @OGSontar
    @OGSontar Před 8 lety +2

    That is so hypnotic. The bottle displays the duality of the pulse so well. It's obviously a point source in the clear portion, but as it enters the label its wave front becomes clear, only to coalesce back into a point again.

  • @pollin1337
    @pollin1337 Před 9 lety +7

    amazing... 8:30 best shot IMO. the delayed reflection in the mirror. reminder that light is physical matter. you never see the light beam directly, only the light that is reflected back to the camera. awe and wonder.

  • @espinoth9913
    @espinoth9913 Před 8 lety +56

    Its so weird to see waves of light. The effect is so disorienting; and it makes everything look like low-poly 3D computer models.

    • @0422Juls
      @0422Juls Před 7 lety +1

      Ażula Arktändr lol yea. wonder why that is. The curiosities of life

    • @quantumdude836
      @quantumdude836 Před 7 lety +1

      welcome to the world of quantum physics!

    • @isaacbitme
      @isaacbitme Před 7 lety +4

      They didn't use camera's, they used sensors. It more than likely was a 3d computer model that reacted in relation to the data that was collected. The only way to reach 1,000,000,000,000fps realistically.

    • @isaacbitme
      @isaacbitme Před 7 lety +5

      +Paintball mag You really add to a conversation and make all the other bulbs in the box shine brighter. I'm sure your mother is proud. Keep up the good work that you're doing to make the world a better place.

    • @gorillaump5869
      @gorillaump5869 Před 6 lety

      Ażula Arktändr , well at least in not the only one who noticed that.

  • @Cyrvs71
    @Cyrvs71 Před 5 lety +2

    That camera set-up may just be able to capture the entire length of my attention span.

  • @exapsy
    @exapsy Před 9 lety +97

    Fake ... CZcams has only 30-60fps available ...

    • @exapsy
      @exapsy Před 9 lety

      ***** I don't know if there is code in the CZcams back-end for that ... but none of the videos use 120 fps ... :P And currently DSL can't catch 1080p with 120 fps probably .. I am too bored to make calculations to see if they can download so many frames in a sec .

    • @emperusDS
      @emperusDS Před 9 lety

      ***** +1

    • @exapsy
      @exapsy Před 9 lety +5

      ***** Yeah ... because "trolling" and "bad jokes" are too extreme for you mate ... don't you have something better to do instead of insulting people for unknown reason ? You too little idiot ? *****

    • @exapsy
      @exapsy Před 9 lety +2

      ***** Yep I am ... what's your arguments about that ?
      You're stupid because you don't have something better to do than just insulting someone ...
      I'm stupid because I have better things to do than videos for "How to play BF4" videos and insulting people without reason and arguments ...
      so your level of stupidity may be much higher than mine, isnt it ?

    • @exapsy
      @exapsy Před 9 lety +5

      ***** And that's why you're stupid, thank you for finally saying some arguments ... but I told you before that it was a bad joke and nothing more man ... the fuck ? I thought everyone on the comments would be like "Wow such good joke" ... and you take it serious ? I study IT since I was 12 ... I don't need your explanation over the topic for this shit ...

  • @simtan2418
    @simtan2418 Před 8 lety +108

    now slow mo light travelling to a mirror

  • @alagorrogala1174
    @alagorrogala1174 Před 9 lety +8

    a spaceship one day will use this technology to scan the surface of unknown planets with nothing but flashes of light.
    science you are truly awesome.

  • @wbenedet
    @wbenedet Před 9 lety +24

    Can you use this on the double slits experiment with 1 photon shot through it?

    • @telemachin
      @telemachin Před 9 lety +16

      curiosity killed the cat.....

    • @JimboWizbo
      @JimboWizbo Před 9 lety +9

      If you fire one photon you won't see it, because it won't hit the lens, it will hit the plate behind the slits!

    • @telemachin
      @telemachin Před 9 lety

      i have been fixing computers all days, i am not on youtube to think, i will cook that damn cat and make a " cat cooking video" on youtube.

    • @telemachin
      @telemachin Před 9 lety +4

      not really, but dealing with users......

    • @alex10791
      @alex10791 Před 9 lety

      Walter Benedette Junior I'm pretty sure that would force the photon/universe to chose a state so there shouldn't be any more information into that other than what we already have. But it would be cool to watch

  • @stoneybaloney5514
    @stoneybaloney5514 Před 8 lety +5

    the slow mo guys need this

  • @hithummah
    @hithummah Před 8 lety +88

    why the white guy also sounds indian?

    • @pv7523
      @pv7523 Před 8 lety +4

      +hithummah cause he is Indian, Ramesh raskar.

    • @andrescaceres2974
      @andrescaceres2974 Před 8 lety +2

      He's greek his name is Andreas

    • @MegaSheep0
      @MegaSheep0 Před 8 lety +5

      +Andres Caceres The name Andreas is really common on northern europe and germany. So I would guess he is German

    • @andrescaceres2974
      @andrescaceres2974 Před 8 lety

      Illya Chabarov www.behindthename.com/name/andreas

    • @andrescaceres2974
      @andrescaceres2974 Před 8 lety

      Illya Chabarov There is a variation of the name Andreas in German but I'm not sure how to spell it. Although you are right in some ways, Andreas comes from Ancient Greek and Latin

  • @chairmanofrussia
    @chairmanofrussia Před 9 lety +7

    3:20 so this is what they mean when they say everything we see is just light reflecting off of stuff! Wow!!!

  • @highvoltagefeathers
    @highvoltagefeathers Před 10 lety +1

    At this frame rate, watching a bullet cross the screen would take several years.

  • @TheTrumanZoo
    @TheTrumanZoo Před 9 lety +1

    this demonstrates the particle wave duality... it moves along a path... so it is a particle... that radiates in all sides from the origin point.... so the wave calc applies on this part of the effect that consists of two

  • @ashrafalsharafi7674
    @ashrafalsharafi7674 Před 7 lety +10

    this just simulation.

  • @robertshaver4432
    @robertshaver4432 Před 9 lety +19

    is it a particle or is it a wave? what is the wave? Affected space time?
    How the hell?...Way Cool!!!

    • @213SEMPERFI
      @213SEMPERFI Před 9 lety +5

      It's an electromagnetic wave with wave/particle properties.

  • @Ruggedystim
    @Ruggedystim Před rokem

    I have always wanted to see this, thank you

  • @chrishydahl4580
    @chrishydahl4580 Před 10 lety +2

    The people who comment things like "it would take two years with that framerate". Well, that's on a basis that the actual "tape" is one second long. Which it is not. It is the length of fotons traveling through a short distance. Which again is waaaaaaaaay shorter than 1 second :-)

  • @0TylerDurden0
    @0TylerDurden0 Před 8 lety +4

    Maybe you guys should use this camera to study sonoluminescence.

  • @christopherveld6555
    @christopherveld6555 Před 9 lety +6

    ok, so you are viewing light passing over objects, but here is a catch... If you need light to interact with the camera in order to view anything, what are we actually seeing here?

    • @christopherveld6555
      @christopherveld6555 Před 9 lety

      Id really like to see light travel over a high speed moving object in contrast to a stationary object.

    • @MsHojat
      @MsHojat Před 7 lety +3

      Light is way too fast for there to be any noticeable difference (at least for any sort of current machine we have, or that will even be likely to exist ever). Both would look like light moving pas a stationary object.
      That said, what you're describing could not even be done properly. The method being used here uses the same technique as "stop motion", so if a moving object was to be used, it would need to have absurdly precise activation times and trajectories such that it would be in a consistent position for each stop motion frame taken. If one was to use a gun, this process would require shooting the gun thousands of times at the same spot with femtosecond-level actuation timing accuracy which I suspect might be impossible with current tech, although in theory it's at least possible (if not already possible).
      Like I already said though, it would be completely pointless though because a speeding bullet is just like a stationary object to light, and you could get the same effect by just suspending a bullet in the air with a string.

  • @Anonarchist
    @Anonarchist Před 8 lety +2

    In 30 years this camera will be in $50 phones, but no one's going to waste a gallon of gas on obsolete smartphone technology.

    • @SOLACEISHERE
      @SOLACEISHERE Před 8 lety

      Hopefully we'll find another fuel source

  • @kithekennaz
    @kithekennaz Před 10 lety +1

    Beautiful. I never imagined that i might see a photonic wave front outside of my imagination. I'd be thrilled to see some of the experiments suggested in the comments. Double points for cleverness with this gizmo. Keep up the good work.

  • @lemon4538
    @lemon4538 Před 7 lety +5

    so the camera shutters faster than the speed of light? ok...

    • @ParanoidMaster
      @ParanoidMaster Před 4 lety

      rewatch the video, actually listen to what the scientist explains, then double check if your question has any logic...

  • @VikingPotatoes
    @VikingPotatoes Před 10 lety +14

    now all we need is a monitor that is 1 billion Hz and a youtube player that displays more than 30 fps.

    • @TheKittenish
      @TheKittenish Před 10 lety +1

      Maybe there should be an option to upload or display a video with more FPS, but for 95% of CZcams videos 30FPS is perfect and in fact better than 60FPS because 60FPS would buffer 2x slower, it would suck.

    • @rakenguitars
      @rakenguitars Před 10 lety +1

      And technically even on a 30 FPS if you were to watch a 1 billion fps picture you are seeing it in 1 billion fps...

    • @BoeingAirbusGuy
      @BoeingAirbusGuy Před 9 lety

      TheKittenish well now you can play some videos at 60FPS

    • @VikingPotatoes
      @VikingPotatoes Před 9 lety

      boeingairbusguy Only newer videos. If they choose to render at 60fps

  • @oatlord
    @oatlord Před 8 lety

    Nice to see Dr. House's friend is getting work after leaving the hospital.

  • @shawn.spencer
    @shawn.spencer Před 8 lety

    Why would anyone dislike this? Like, it's science, not an opinion.

  • @jasonortiz9981
    @jasonortiz9981 Před 9 lety +6

    That is indeed a VERY fast camera. But not really capturing MOVING light cause that would be impossible as photons have to hit the cameras sensors in the first place. so this is the best you can get. more like a scan

    • @samirasaad9972
      @samirasaad9972 Před 6 lety

      Jason Ortiz the photons already hit the cameras sensors before they actually flew past the front of the camera

    • @petterlarsson7257
      @petterlarsson7257 Před 3 lety

      They shot a laser not a photon
      Laser emit photon

  • @Harsh-uk7om
    @Harsh-uk7om Před 5 lety +4

    Dammm..I played another video of light moving x0.25 speed and got a better experience than this...lol😂😂😂

  • @previ26
    @previ26 Před 6 lety

    This is so fascinating, so beautiful... I could watch this for hours...

  • @orionsswords
    @orionsswords Před 10 lety +2

    I was wondering the same thing. The higher the FPS the faster the shutter has to move. Which means that the exposure time is much less. I had the opportunity to use a high speed camera for some testing for a robotics team I'm on. We were running tests at

  • @67tall
    @67tall Před 4 lety +6

    2:23 looks like a fake…How cam see these scattering cloud of photons around scene, if this cloud of photons does not arriving in to cam yet? WTF he explaned it?

    • @petterlarsson7257
      @petterlarsson7257 Před 3 lety +1

      He litteraly shot Photons right next to the camera idiot

  • @donaldkjenstad1129
    @donaldkjenstad1129 Před 8 lety +28

    Can this be done for the double slit experiment? I would love to see that.

    • @tradestone100
      @tradestone100 Před 8 lety

      +Donald Kjenstad (DonK) I don't think so. Look that: watch?v=TkJ_WgruM2g at 54:15

    • @nathansmith3608
      @nathansmith3608 Před 8 lety +2

      you could maybe work this into some version of the double slit experiment comma but it wouldn't affect the results or anything. the issue in the double slit experiment is the Observer Paradox - basically that you can't make precise measurements of a given particle at the quantum scale, partly because the particles seem to exist as slightly amorphous probability clouds until we cause something measurable to interact w/ them
      it doesn't relate to how quick our measuring devices are, far as I can tell, b/c if we watched the particle, that would still be the observed condition & collapse the wave (plus, I think the electrons or other particles you could use are so light that the laser would risk knocking them right off the table)

    • @donaldkjenstad1129
      @donaldkjenstad1129 Před 8 lety +1

      +Brent Yeah, I know that intellectually, It's so hard to understand it. This duality of particles(wave and particle) is such a hard concept to get your head around. The collapse of the wave function is totally strange. I think someone said that if you think you understand quantum physics, you really don't understand QP.

    • @Hunne2303
      @Hunne2303 Před 8 lety

      what if there is nothing to actually understand?

    • @ffs55
      @ffs55 Před 8 lety

      My understanding is that we COULD, but it would be entirely unrevealing. We would see the illumination of the pulse from the light source slowly "move" along the video, where you see the 1 cm pulse width momentarily light up the backdrop in the familiar harmonic visual pattern that you're familiar with. Remember, this isn't a conventional movie camera with just some impossibly high FPS. It *simulates* an ultra-high FPS bc the scene is (a) static and (b) has lighting effect that is precisely repeated via precise illumination burst (i.e. there's a presumption that the same time-space lighting effect unfoldment is reproduced each time -- thus the video capture process is possible only if it captures a reality that happens to be de-multiplex-able in space-time). The tip off is that it requires its "slowly rotating" mirror for the process to werk.

  • @mrbluenun
    @mrbluenun Před 9 lety

    Hi,
    And thanks for your upload.
    Can you tell me if you are viewing single ‘flecks’ of light, what is all around that particular light? Or is it the machine focusing one that array and if the focus is moved the tiniest fraction it would show the light rays either above or below the ones seen in the first picture?

  • @tuberyou1149
    @tuberyou1149 Před 7 lety

    This is what I was thinking. Thanks.

  • @Aaron.Reichert
    @Aaron.Reichert Před 9 lety +7

    SmarterEveryDay high speed camera

  • @hawkboy1792
    @hawkboy1792 Před 8 lety +4

    send one of these to the slomoguys

  • @navneetsingh6824
    @navneetsingh6824 Před 4 lety

    Oh i am watching it 7 years after posted.OP

  • @sanjeevarjungaur
    @sanjeevarjungaur Před 9 lety

    Guys super excellent work! Greetings to people who understand!

  • @ERiCDrAyViN
    @ERiCDrAyViN Před 7 lety +4

    Don't under stand this at all. How can you see a photon that is moving 'across' your line of vision? The photon has to go into the camera lens for the camera to see it.

  • @Naytowl
    @Naytowl Před 9 lety +19

    slow mo guys wouldnt like that...

  • @anthonyvolkman2338
    @anthonyvolkman2338 Před 6 lety +1

    I can't like it enough! So amazing!!

  • @robertbruce1386
    @robertbruce1386 Před 6 lety

    Gotta love good science...
    Thanks for this !

  • @NuanDaa
    @NuanDaa Před 7 lety +17

    They still can't see my fart.

  • @TheSuperslajsaren
    @TheSuperslajsaren Před 8 lety +10

    WHY YOU NO UPLOUD IN 60 FPS ohh the video is from 2012... ok sry

  • @JIMJAMSC
    @JIMJAMSC Před 8 lety

    Oh great. Now you have to sit and wait a few decades while the customer picks their favorite pictures.

  • @ChileThailandtravel
    @ChileThailandtravel Před 5 lety

    Thanks for sharing and I have subscribed

  • @ashir555
    @ashir555 Před 9 lety +7

    I'm the only one wich didn't understand squat and only saw light moving in slow motion???

  • @Josh-le6lu
    @Josh-le6lu Před 8 lety +7

    0:14 Oh, he said photons! I was just about to say "There's no way in hell a football can go that fast!". That accent is so awesome! Sounds like a text to speech machine.

  • @cosmosliger
    @cosmosliger Před 9 lety

    This is really cool. Notice on the Coke bottle one how the parts of the image farther away from the camera show the band of light farther back along the bottle, because it takes longer to get to the lens from there.
    _However_, we're not looking at individual photons. We're looking at an individual laser light pulse composed of a whole bunch of them (the thing about photons that you only observe them in one place so you need a whole bunch of them to make an image)
    Still, fascinating.

  • @alienlabs
    @alienlabs Před 10 lety

    There is a big misunderstanding about this, the title doesn't help.
    There isn't a cam THIS fast, it'd be impossible.
    This movie is done by simply taking photos with a precisely timed delay.
    Imagine a car passing by in front of your house every 5 minutes: you take a picture of it when it's distant, then 5 minutes later you take a picture of it when it's a bit closer, then 5 minutes later you again take a photo when it's even closer and so on.
    Put all pictures in sequence and there you have it.

  • @NovemberBegin
    @NovemberBegin Před 7 lety +16

    but can it run crysis?

  • @billorights1596
    @billorights1596 Před 8 lety +29

    it really quickly filmed the most boring 13 mins ever in the universe

  • @TheTrumanZoo
    @TheTrumanZoo Před 9 lety

    ohhhhh the burn effect comes after the position of the small particle it seems... there is a small air sream in front of the effect comming of the even smaller emitting particle it seems to me... this might be because of friction in air... this effect would look different in a vacumm i think the distance between particle and effect woiuld be shorter or longer.. visible thrue the longer or shorter front tail...
    i frooze the video on 5:51

  • @ronallen2200
    @ronallen2200 Před 5 lety

    Wow I think I saw to tomato quiver just a bit there guys. Awesome job

  • @albertsitoe7340
    @albertsitoe7340 Před 8 lety +3

    They cheated

  • @tilligetbig
    @tilligetbig Před 9 lety +8

    this is great but where are the sharks with lasers on their heads!!

  • @AlxM96
    @AlxM96 Před 10 lety

    The best i can do is writing what the MIT scientists say on their own site: " We use a pico-second accurate detector. We use a special imager called a "STREAK TUBE" (or "s. camera") that behaves like an oscilloscope with corresponding trigger and deflection of beams. A light pulse [...] is then deflected in the perpendicular direction so that photons that arrive first hit the detector at a different position compared to photons that arrive later. The resulting image forms a "streak" of light."

  • @flintwestwood5920
    @flintwestwood5920 Před 6 lety

    The proof is really at 8:30. You can actually see the object illuminated, but not its reflection, and then the reflection illuminated, but not the object, thus demonstrating light captured in "mid flight". That's awesome!

  • @jst1man
    @jst1man Před 9 lety +27

    Yawn... How much money wasted.

    • @davidrahrer
      @davidrahrer Před 9 lety +68

      The ability to actually view a photon wave could be incredibly useful for medical diagnostics, along with things we haven't even thought of yet. How did you came to your "money wasted" position, especially considering the relatively small expenditure in question?

    • @NavanBethrax
      @NavanBethrax Před 9 lety +22

      You just dont get the possibilitys that we get with this invention.

    • @sethrobey3676
      @sethrobey3676 Před 9 lety +34

      Yeah, we could have better spent the money on salaries for professional sports athletes.

    • @cmdrdrdeath6624
      @cmdrdrdeath6624 Před 9 lety +3

      This opens up the possibility to use improved light scatter instead of ultra sound for tissue imaging in the medical field. Hardly a waste of money. One day you'll be glad that the new imaging technologies caught a disease early.

    • @camlind12
      @camlind12 Před 9 lety

      Not everybody wants to work on the cure for cancer or some other of the "noble" causes.

  • @gingyburticus6805
    @gingyburticus6805 Před 9 lety +15

    No of this matters. The human eye cant see past 24 FPS anyway

    • @willoughbykrenzteinburg
      @willoughbykrenzteinburg Před 8 lety +24

      Cameron Burticus You aren't WATCHING it at a trillion frames per second. You are WATCHING it at 30 fps. It was CAPTURED at a trillion frames per second - - and slowed WAY DOWN to 30 fps.
      By the way, the human eye can see far more than 24 fps. Where did you get this number? There are videos right here on youtube that playback at either 30 fps or 60 fps - and you can tell the difference. 60 fps looks all soap-opera-y. The human eye can differentiate between frame rates up to about 150 fps.

    • @gingyburticus6805
      @gingyburticus6805 Před 8 lety +2

      Willoughby Krenzteinburg Dude. All of the movies are in 24 FPS cause the human eye cant see past that.

    • @gate3929
      @gate3929 Před 8 lety +10

      Cameron Burticus 24 FPS? Dude, we can see 60 fps.
      Well, if you can't then you need an eye test or some shit.

    • @gingyburticus6805
      @gingyburticus6805 Před 8 lety +2

      Jude's guide to games No dude I promise my xbox does 30 and its is smooth because I cant see 30

    • @gate3929
      @gate3929 Před 8 lety +12

      Cameron Burticus
      Yeah, somethings wrong with your eyes. 30 is laggy as hell for me.

  • @martijnwarren9779
    @martijnwarren9779 Před 8 lety

    Can you add some more specifications on the Laser source in terms of Frequency. It appears to be around the 500nm. is that correct?

  • @TheTrumanZoo
    @TheTrumanZoo Před 9 lety

    and it also seems the speed of the particle has less refracting influence than i suspected... the refraction happens but keeps moving along the same path as the origin most ahead particle after it widdens it keeps moving along with it..

  • @803brando
    @803brando Před 9 lety +2

    10:28 is an amazing example. light source if coming from the left, hits a surface on the right, you can see the photons change directions! they should try using odd non-everyday objects like cylindrical cones of different degrees.

  • @RomeoTudose
    @RomeoTudose Před 10 lety

    The amount of light you need to iluminate a subject in order to record at over 500K fps is extremely huge.

  • @senseofnickels
    @senseofnickels Před 10 lety

    Not surprisingly, what you described is the very definition of a video.
    Back in the day, when "motion pictures" were first described (see Muybridge), this is exactly what they did. They took timed-delay pictures from separate cameras. Now we have sensors that can take multiple pictures in a row. Doesn't make this any less of a video. Both are still a sequence of images at a specified delay.

  • @psychedeliccarrie5921
    @psychedeliccarrie5921 Před 5 lety +1

    But can it see why kids love the taste of Cinnamon Toast Crunch?

  • @leaderauto9300
    @leaderauto9300 Před 3 lety

    The thought did cross my mind that some of these images may be what the big bang may have looked like

  • @tuberyou1149
    @tuberyou1149 Před 7 lety +2

    After all, it's a 'virtual' camera so anything they have done with it has produced 'virtual' results.

  • @2lovejune
    @2lovejune Před 9 lety

    Amazing!
    But where did the guy get this music from? And what is the name of the music playing during the 1 trillion FPS demonstration?

  • @spaghettiandmeatballs6471

    I am legitimately in awe.

  • @omerfaruksaglam8270
    @omerfaruksaglam8270 Před 7 lety +1

    I 'm sure that Einstein want to see this.

  • @lilybogusz3576
    @lilybogusz3576 Před 10 lety

    This is absolutely amazing! +1 for science!!

  • @donnabrahamworsley5857
    @donnabrahamworsley5857 Před 4 lety +1

    So if it can capture the speed of light how exactly did you manage to make the light that was on the objects go in small waves like that? Did you take a flashlight and turn it on and off at the litteral speed of light?

  • @marabundo
    @marabundo Před 7 lety

    finaly now you can record double-slit experiment

  • @DJWaffleston
    @DJWaffleston Před 10 lety

    No one's forcing you to stay and watch, genius.

  • @iamazdavids
    @iamazdavids Před 6 lety

    Finally a camera that can catch a full Chuck Norris kick.

  • @xSabretoothx15
    @xSabretoothx15 Před 10 lety

    None of you are even close. Assuming only 3 seconds of the explosion is recorded and the video is played back at 30 fps, the slow-motion video would last over 3,000 years. Light's faster than you think.

  • @notcyndi
    @notcyndi Před 9 lety

    Hey, it's back! Why did you make this a private video for a year?

  • @James-wd9ib
    @James-wd9ib Před 7 lety

    Not sure if you noticed this, but after the expanding "bubble" of light hits the tomato thing, the tomato thing stays glowing well after the "light bubble" continues toward the wall. Photons bouncing around inside opaque matter? Food for thought. Wait, wtf was that rainbow afterwards

  • @SuperZarrabal
    @SuperZarrabal Před 8 lety +1

    I am stoned, and I have found the answer to the question of How would a room look like when I shut down lights at slowmo

  • @renereiche
    @renereiche Před 10 lety +1

    Yeah, double slit experiment with chalk powder please! Also one with materials in which light travels at very different speeds in.

  • @patrickmccormack1928
    @patrickmccormack1928 Před 8 lety

    Howdy, where did you source the music?

  • @gravitomagneticpower
    @gravitomagneticpower Před 10 měsíci

    After few repeats I finally understood how this works. The high speed camera is really fast but can capture only one row of the video. But since the every pulse looks the same, the entire 2d image can be composed from many takes row by row. Every take has to look the same which is possible with the light.
    Interesting idea but not useful for a shot that does not look each time the same (explosions etc...). I understand now why it is called "virtual" camera. But yeah, nice! With one row today, once it will be possible to take the entire shot with one try.

  • @busybillyb33
    @busybillyb33 Před 5 lety

    Great. With this camera, I can finally see how a tortoise moves.

  • @MisledTrick
    @MisledTrick Před 9 lety

    What would be the size of the raw video file of something that was recorded at 1 trillion frames per second? Would it be large?

  • @somethingtojenga
    @somethingtojenga Před 8 lety +1

    One trillion. Just think about that. Counting up to 1,000,000,000,000 in a single second. You could count every dollar Bill Gates has 12 times a second with this camera.

  • @DanielDTUBWeinberger
    @DanielDTUBWeinberger Před 10 lety

    Fascinating, two questions, how many gigabytes does one second of video take and 2, how long did it take to render (I'm presuming you used a 3970X or 2 xeons

  • @oldsouthsteve
    @oldsouthsteve Před 9 lety

    And then, my brain exploded.

  • @peoplez129
    @peoplez129 Před 3 lety

    People need to realize that this is all computer generated. The reason being is that light would also need to travel to the camera, and by the time that happened, the light in the bottle would have already traversed the entire bottle.

  • @SkillUpMobileGaming
    @SkillUpMobileGaming Před 7 lety

    I came here by typing "1000000000000000fps" into CZcams...

  • @johnpublic7872
    @johnpublic7872 Před 9 lety

    Interesting that with this technology we have all the tool we need to build a militarily effective photon cannon.

  • @delcox4477
    @delcox4477 Před 10 lety

    People keep overlooking the "virtual" part of "virtual slow motion camera". This setup isn't showing the same photons moving through the target. It's taking hundreds of pictures, each of a different set of photons, each at a different point in the target. Then they just slap the pictures together in an order that gives the illusion of progression. The only thing that's really amazing is the shutter speed.

  • @pielovingp
    @pielovingp Před 10 lety

    Now they have managed to capture light. They have made something awesome. CZcams should try to do something like that too. By bringing back old CZcams :)

  • @lucasleivia
    @lucasleivia Před 9 lety

    amazing. but in a few years we'll have them on smart phones and teenagers will be using them to take selfies