@@vcv5021 , thank you kindly. So I guess I have to take that number and take that other number and / that number??? And then I get the years! Would you do me one more favor and tell me how many years it would take in comparison to light?
@@VeryUsefulGadgets edit: for all confusing people there, I’m rewording it, so if we say that we freeze world that much that in 6 seconds for our perception would pass 50 picoseconds for surrounding world, the ratio per second would be 8.33 picoseconds of surrounding world per 1 second of our perception, now we take 1 real second and divide it by 8.33 picoseconds which would be 0.12 seconds that would be difference between speed of our perception and time that would go, so it would be in picoseconds 120000000000 which for us would be like seconds, now if we convert it into a years it would be 3805 years for our perception, so yeah technically its cap but practically if you would be in freezing time you will go insane and loose count.
What I love about laboratory buildings is that you'll have this astounding, mind blowing technology that's just behind a boring grey door labelled "CUP".
This is mind blowing. When I graduated with my physics degree I never imagined I would live to see the day humanity could accomplish this! I would recommend doing a double slit experiment with this camera, it should be awesome!
@Bowhuntertexas I wouldn’t normally wade in, but this is a frustrating comment. Just because you can’t conceive how something works doesn’t automatically mean it’s fake. Physics isn’t the limitation here - your depth of understanding is.
Wouldn't you only be able to see a photon as a particle? If you're observing it from the gun all the way to the screen, it would have to behave like a particle the entire way, and it would only pass through one slit.
@@jeffn9952I doubt you would be able to see a “particle”, as a photon isn’t really a particle in the macroscopic sense of the word. But I’d definitely love to see this experiment.
Mines only 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 but I wanted 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 fps :(
Idk if I’m just a science nerd or what, but seeing with my own eyes the speed of light felt incredibly profound. Like seeing something I wasn’t meant to see. You know that feeling in your stomach when an elevator takes off kinda fast? Don’t laugh at me, but I actually felt that for a second!
But what if we were meant to see it…that’s our power as humans..we can take any raw material from this planet and turn it into a device..or extension of ourselves in order to see and do things no other species can. We are the true alchemists
@@flodgey Hawking doesn't have much to do with it, mate, apart from being a physicist. Plus, he's seen it. He passed away recently, not 60 years ago. Einstein would've cried tears of joy because he discovered the Photoelectric effect (for which he was awarded his Nobel prize), which shows that light consists of particles (refered to as quanta or photons). This can be seen here especially well in the trapped photon experiment where it bounced like pong.
It's almost hard to comprehend what a huge step this was in terms of technological development. The speed of light is the speed limit of the universe itself, there is now nothing in the universe that we know of that's too fast for us to see. That's genuinely mind blowing.
Uh, no, not the speed of light, but the speed of light in a vacuum. That's not what we see here. And when not in a vacuum, the speed of light is not the limit any longer, see the Cherenkov radiation.
@@sergeyromanov2116 isn’t speed of light in vacuo basically impossible tho, since nowhere in the universe is really a true vacuum? Obviously we can’t observe that, it doesn’t really exist in practical sense
@@brandonhughes4076 how does it matter whether it is possible in the real world? It's still the limit that cannot be beaten (whereas the speed of light in a medium can be both reached and beaten, as happens all the time, I gave you an example). So your response is a non sequitur, since it does not address my criticism of your comment.
@@saitoh5424 theoretically yes, but our models of special relativity and general relativity break down at speeds faster than the speed of light. General consensus among physicists is that it may be possible for something to be faster than the speed of light, but because the speed of light itself is impossible, nothing that’s slower than light will ever go faster and nothing that’s faster than light will ever go slower
I think it was, because how would the pulse stay collimated after bouncing off a curved surface a dozen times? Unless they cheated and just put flat sections of mirror where they calculated the ideal beam would hit...
@Dd Jim if you literally search on Google "what is the highest FPS your eyes can see" it will say 1000 FPS. So even more than what I said, and definitely more than your "PhD" friend
I just came across from the video of Verisatium, saying that this kind of experiment is a two-way measurement (like the light that travel from A to B and the light going to lenses of the camera). He added that no one really measure one-way (hence, no one exactly knows the exact speed of light). I find it so fascinating. My mind blown.
I’m trying to figure out how it is posible too. I’ve watched Versatium’s video and he said clearly that doing this way the measurement, the real speed of light can’t be measured, my mind is blowing now.
@@haroldy.estrada9391 That's why they are shooting the beam of light through water bottles and dairy milk. Light slows down depending on what it's traveling through, so they slow light down just a fraction in order for it to show up on camera. You couldn't film light going it's true speed because cameras need to absorb that light in order to create the picture, so the camera would be taking pics faster than light can move.
I don't know if i'm missing something here. But isn't it the basic principle of seeing?..light reflects from something and falls on your eye or camera lense and it sees.. How can you catch something that is allowing you to see in the first place.
@@someonenoone6653 exactly. That's why no one really measures the exact speed. When we try to measure the speed of the light, we are going to use our eyes or camera and in order to measure that, we use our eyes or camera lens, light also travels to our eyes/camera lens while measuring (that will affect how we measure the speed of the light). Isn't it fascinating? Lol
Seems clear to me that you CAN measure the one-way speed of light. The light travels along a linear path with distance markers. Count the frames, measure how far the light travelled, and do the math. If the tiny variation in distance from the light to the camera (or in the lens, etc) would slightly stretch the timing, then adjust for it with the math - these are known variables! It's true that by the time the first few frames of light movement actually gets to the camera, the experiment might already be over. But that just means all frames are equally delayed (no matter what the speed is from experiment to camera). In my view, how can we say this is not an accurate way to measure the one-way speed of light? If the key factor is EXACT speed, then forget about it. Nothing can ever be measured EXACTLY.
@@tarmoheinonen4645 nothing in the universe can cross the speed of light. But in order to capture the speed of light you need a camera whose lens can capture photoes otherwise open and close faster than speed of light. So its impossible
The idea is based on a "streak camera", but extended in to 2D instead of 1D. They take a single image which captures some tiny duration of light propagation, but its time domain is spread across a spatial domain, so they essentially turn time into space, so it does not require an ultrafast processor. The resulting video is produced after the fact, based on the data captured.
@@bladepanthera Since we can't actually measure the speed of light atm that is the closest thing we can do, guestimate. Still mighty impressive what a gigabrain thought that up.
When they said that if you fired a bullet through the same frame it would take years to get to the other side, I think that finally put the speed of light into a proper perspective for me
I don’t think many people realise how fast 10 trillion frames per second really is. Let me give you some perspective- In 1 second the camera will capture 10,000,000,000,000 frames. Doing the math, (at regular speed 30fps) that amounts to an almost incomprehensible 10,570 YEARS worth of footage! And that is just in 1 second.
@Andy your phone does, the backlight of your display sends out photons through the piece of glass of your phone(or monitor) that you rely on to view your content.
Absolutely brilliant fellas cheers, the young fella showing you the procedure is very smart & switched on and it does my heart well to see the next generation of scientists working.
This experiment is good for the study of Light and Lazers. Thank you so much. I'm sure you have gone in depth to eloborate extensively, scientific points.
11:37 "On this scale of time, if we fired a bullet through this frame, it would take a years to go from one side to the other". The best part of this video 😮
Let’s see. Based on the legend that’s about 17mm across; 50 light-picoseconds is about 15mm. So call it 16mm, which is 0.05 ft. A bullet traveling at 2500 ft/sec could thus travel that distance in 0.00002 seconds. Which is 20 microseconds, 20,000 nanoseconds, or 20,000,000 picoseconds. This video is slowed down to about 10 picoseconds per second so it would take about 2,000,000 seconds for the bullet to go by, which is “only” a bit over 23 days.
It gets even more mind-blowing when you think about the fact that the observable universe is 93 billion light years across. Keep in mind that it's only the observable part.
@@swanihilator6748 yep, i personally believe that matter goes on forever. Considering it would be scientifically impossible for matter itself to have an end.
@@zxckon It goes on forever. But, then there's not enough heat displacement throughout the universe, and all life that relies on heat in some way ceases to exist.
@@swanihilator6748 And to think there are billions upon billions of 'Earth-like' planets that are within observable galaxies. I mean, the universe is so massive it can take several decades to reach one point to another, even while traveling at light speed. Yet, there are still imbeciles who 'refute' the existence of extraterrestrial species.
Seems like most people think that the universe is like the size of our solar system times a million 🤣 Yeah...MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH BIGGER.. And then that times 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. And then A LOOOOOOT more. The Earth is so small, it almost doesn't even exist.
Kind of mind blowing to see how fast light is moving and to realize we are so far from the sun that it takes 8 minutes for the light to get here. I don’t think my brain can fully grasp that kind of distance.
@douglas wahid The guy with the anime shirt that the sjws bullied till NASA forced him to give a public apology? That alone shows why sjws are the scum of the Earth and should be thrown out of an airplane.
Incredible frames! I wish I could see somehow what happens at normal speed first, then appreciate the slow mode to better understand the dynamics of the tiny beam of light. Maybe was just impossible to do. Thank you Slow Mo’s!!
At normal speed it just looked like a beam of light directed at the object because we couldn't see it pulsing at hundreds of millions of times a second (or whatever the rate was) without the camera.
@@irigm6132 I'm pretty sure it's not just one lens, it's at least 5-6 to a ton more synchronized so perfectly against a mirror it looks like one camera. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong
@@clashmastr9895 when light pass through liquid it effect it's speed but still very much faster than anything in the world. If they had used multiple lenses and liquid many more transparent material still camera system is not fast enough to catch it, camera internal system which create frame works on electronic devices and speed of electron are too slow compare to light. This is a joke
Windows 7 is the best OS Microsoft has made, it's been downhill for them ever since. Be glad it wasn't a windows 8 which is by far the worst OS to exist.
@@Ketoswammy That is because Macs are made by Apple and Apple keep their products extremely minimalistic. There is literary nothing worth copying as doing so would be a downgrade due to removing features to fit the Apple theme.
I remember the 70s and 80s. Black holes were purely theoretical, everyone knew we would never, ever ne able to see one. Atoms were far too small to ever be seen, controlled nuclear fusion was pure silliness and the idea that one day we would be able to take a video of a beam of light as it travels along didn't even enter the minds of anyone except a few crazy people who had taken some exceptional acid or shrooms. Yes we didn't get flying cars or bacofoil suits, but the future we're living in has some really cool stuff in it that I'm really enjoying.
I think you're right that the light has to bounce off the milk and scatter towards the camera which takes additional time, but that's happening continuously as the beam travels from left to right so although there is an additional delay, I don't think it changes the overall *rate*. Therefore I disagree, I think we are actually seeing "the speed of light".
Keep in mind that it's the reflection that arrive to the camera. Due light nature, we cant see it if a fraction doesnt reflect to the camera. That is the reason for the 'strange shape'.
I would argue that if it ain't broke, it don't need fixing. Windows Vista is unoptimized and was buggy, but from what I've heard, after 4 service packs it's miles better than its initial release, which everyone thinks it still is today.
There are still places out in the wild using pre windows 95 Operating Systems. Generally for very specialised uses the software that does what they want doing is working just fine with the older hardware and they don't need a better OS so going to the hassle of re-writing and bug hunting what they're actually running o the hardware is unnecessary in the extreme. There are even hardware manufacturers that specialize in supply custom hardware thats compatible with ancient operating systems.
darthkarl99 adding on to that, a large portion of the us military (getting this all from infographics show) uses very old versions of windows. And upgrading would be dangerous. (Not directly quoted btw)
![[Vowel]물고기는 물에서 살아야 해🐟🤣Fish have to live in the water #funny](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3G9MH063Cx4/mqdefault.jpg)
"A picosecond is to a second as one second is to approximately 31,689 years." That's so wild
I want to know how long it would take a bullet to travel 1mm at that slow rate.
@@joefox9765 for a bullet with the velocity of 700 meters per second, it would reach 1mm after 1428500 picoseconds
@@vcv5021 , thank you kindly. So I guess I have to take that number and take that other number and / that number??? And then I get the years! Would you do me one more favor and tell me how many years it would take in comparison to light?
@@joefox9765 Dividing it by their roughly-10 femtoseconds per second playback speed it only seems to amount to ~40 hours per millimeter.
@@hk0O7 now I'm more confused 🤯 I just want to know how long a bullet would take
The world's fastest camera is connected to a *WINDOWS 7 COMPUTER* .
The slower the better
I just noticed XD
@@soodless4159 underrated
Dirt Block HAHAHA
@@soodless4159 Lmao.
11:01 If it was a 1 second (realtime) recording, watching it at this speed would take around 4000 years.
Cap
КАК ТЫ ,ЭТО ПОСЧИТАЛ?????
@@VeryUsefulGadgets edit: for all confusing people there, I’m rewording it, so if we say that we freeze world that much that in 6 seconds for our perception would pass 50 picoseconds for surrounding world, the ratio per second would be 8.33 picoseconds of surrounding world per 1 second of our perception, now we take 1 real second and divide it by 8.33 picoseconds which would be 0.12 seconds that would be difference between speed of our perception and time that would go, so it would be in picoseconds 120000000000 which for us would be like seconds, now if we convert it into a years it would be 3805 years for our perception, so yeah technically its cap but practically if you would be in freezing time you will go insane and loose count.
@@rafael9221 ik
Something’s off with ur calculation
What I love about laboratory buildings is that you'll have this astounding, mind blowing technology that's just behind a boring grey door labelled "CUP".
I'm totally with the idea of building labs that looks like cathedrals and temples
This is a reasonable FPS for gaming.
Mário Souto finally some quality Minecraft gameplay maybe?
A little low, but it’ll do
Ye but you have to download some more ram to operate it and of course you need the brand new 2073924749283ti ztx titan omega pro graphics card
tyrannus is that even a thing
@Ajgleskorv r/whooosh
**records for less than 0.1 seconds**
“We’re out of memory”
The Mandalorian 😂😂
I’m just surprised that the thing that captured light travel didn’t explode.
@@Pain-xw1rj why would it?
@@ok6694 what??
I want to know how many GB/TB of storage this would use for one second of recording
This is mind blowing. When I graduated with my physics degree I never imagined I would live to see the day humanity could accomplish this! I would recommend doing a double slit experiment with this camera, it should be awesome!
Ooh yeah! That is an excellent suggestion!
Absolutely this!!
Humanity didn’t accomplish anything. This is fake. As a physics major you should know that a camera shutter can’t move faster than the speed of light.
@@Bowhuntertexas What an amazing observation! You'll be happy to know that high speed cameras dont use a shutter!
@Bowhuntertexas I wouldn’t normally wade in, but this is a frustrating comment. Just because you can’t conceive how something works doesn’t automatically mean it’s fake. Physics isn’t the limitation here - your depth of understanding is.
I really want to see the famed double-slit experiment filmed through this camera! To actually witness the dual particle-wave behavior at this speed.
That would have been unreal
That would be insane!!
Wouldn't you only be able to see a photon as a particle? If you're observing it from the gun all the way to the screen, it would have to behave like a particle the entire way, and it would only pass through one slit.
Measuring it with the camera would only allow you to see one result of the wave function
@@jeffn9952I doubt you would be able to see a “particle”, as a photon isn’t really a particle in the macroscopic sense of the word. But I’d definitely love to see this experiment.
Me in 2050 complaining that my phone only records 90,000,000,000,000 fps
Pathetic, I complain that my phone only records 134,792,501,927,581,735,798,992,001 fps
oof my phone records at only 12000000000000000fps
My super low end phone has only 261836gb ram and records at 2737383693738fps 😔
Mines only 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 but I wanted 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 fps :(
While iphons will still record a 200fps and people will call it "revolutionary"
*300 000 km/s*
Americans: ???
*A million times faster than a bullet*
Americans: Ahhh!
merica
“A trillion times faster than a drop of oil falling from a bomber”
Underrated
hello 'murica
Murrica
To think we’d have to travel this fast for 4 years straight just to reach the nearest star. That’s how big space is and it’s mind blowing.
Cos, or as some say, Cosm
@@KaminariHouse
Pulls bowblade out.
From our point of view though. The light itself experiences zero travel time and arrives instantly from its point of view.
Idk if I’m just a science nerd or what, but seeing with my own eyes the speed of light felt incredibly profound. Like seeing something I wasn’t meant to see. You know that feeling in your stomach when an elevator takes off kinda fast? Don’t laugh at me, but I actually felt that for a second!
Yeah, I had the same feeling as Gavin in the video... "This is something humans weren't meant to see."
But what if we were meant to see it…that’s our power as humans..we can take any raw material from this planet and turn it into a device..or extension of ourselves in order to see and do things no other species can. We are the true alchemists
You mean for a Pico sec..
What the heck!!! The movement of your stomach might be controlled by your medulla! Or your stomach might be grumbling bcz you were hungry.
I feel you brotha
For the "worlds fastest camera" it looks pretty stationary
Кенп
It's so fast you don't see it moving lol
It’s the fastest filming camera duh 🙄 it can’t move
Squidy 252 r/woooosh
Nicolas Mir I was joking 😂
I think Einstein would cry tears of joy if he saw this
we can't forget about Stephen Hawking
He probably built it when he lived there at CalTech
@@flodgey Hawking doesn't have much to do with it, mate, apart from being a physicist. Plus, he's seen it. He passed away recently, not 60 years ago.
Einstein would've cried tears of joy because he discovered the Photoelectric effect (for which he was awarded his Nobel prize), which shows that light consists of particles (refered to as quanta or photons). This can be seen here especially well in the trapped photon experiment where it bounced like pong.
@@lucifer2133 still moves like a wave too :D as seen in the last shot
Nope... He wouldn't!!!
It's almost hard to comprehend what a huge step this was in terms of technological development. The speed of light is the speed limit of the universe itself, there is now nothing in the universe that we know of that's too fast for us to see. That's genuinely mind blowing.
Uh, no, not the speed of light, but the speed of light in a vacuum. That's not what we see here. And when not in a vacuum, the speed of light is not the limit any longer, see the Cherenkov radiation.
@@sergeyromanov2116 isn’t speed of light in vacuo basically impossible tho, since nowhere in the universe is really a true vacuum? Obviously we can’t observe that, it doesn’t really exist in practical sense
@@brandonhughes4076 how does it matter whether it is possible in the real world? It's still the limit that cannot be beaten (whereas the speed of light in a medium can be both reached and beaten, as happens all the time, I gave you an example). So your response is a non sequitur, since it does not address my criticism of your comment.
You said it right, not that we know, but there can be things way faster
@@saitoh5424 theoretically yes, but our models of special relativity and general relativity break down at speeds faster than the speed of light. General consensus among physicists is that it may be possible for something to be faster than the speed of light, but because the speed of light itself is impossible, nothing that’s slower than light will ever go faster and nothing that’s faster than light will ever go slower
that chaotic light trap was crazy - thought it was an animation for a sec.
I think it was, because how would the pulse stay collimated after bouncing off a curved surface a dozen times? Unless they cheated and just put flat sections of mirror where they calculated the ideal beam would hit...
World's fastest camera: 10 trillion frames per second
Internet Explorer when it's loading: 10 trillion seconds per frame
UNDERRATED 😂
10T+ years later: **windows shutting down**
And that is why we use google
Harris Holding google isn’t a browser
@@asdf14051 yes it he meant chrome
PC gamers:
"We need 10 trillion FPS! We know the tech exists!"
@Dd Jim 600-700fps*
@Dd Jim if you literally search on Google "what is the highest FPS your eyes can see" it will say 1000 FPS. So even more than what I said, and definitely more than your "PhD" friend
@@benjyyy4168 you can’t see 1000 frames but you can see 1000 hrtz
@@sirtheodorethelll633 that's what I meant my bad
Is PhD means Pizza Hut Delivery
I came here to see light moving in slow motion. But found myself slowing down this video to see how the shoe cover machine worked too. Bonus.
FYI that thing breaks easily. We introduced that in our factory a few years ago but quickly abandoned because of the high maintenance…
I just came across from the video of Verisatium, saying that this kind of experiment is a two-way measurement (like the light that travel from A to B and the light going to lenses of the camera). He added that no one really measure one-way (hence, no one exactly knows the exact speed of light). I find it so fascinating. My mind blown.
I’m trying to figure out how it is posible too. I’ve watched Versatium’s video and he said clearly that doing this way the measurement, the real speed of light can’t be measured, my mind is blowing now.
@@haroldy.estrada9391 That's why they are shooting the beam of light through water bottles and dairy milk. Light slows down depending on what it's traveling through, so they slow light down just a fraction in order for it to show up on camera. You couldn't film light going it's true speed because cameras need to absorb that light in order to create the picture, so the camera would be taking pics faster than light can move.
I don't know if i'm missing something here.
But isn't it the basic principle of seeing?..light reflects from something and falls on your eye or camera lense and it sees..
How can you catch something that is allowing you to see in the first place.
@@someonenoone6653 exactly. That's why no one really measures the exact speed. When we try to measure the speed of the light, we are going to use our eyes or camera and in order to measure that, we use our eyes or camera lens, light also travels to our eyes/camera lens while measuring (that will affect how we measure the speed of the light). Isn't it fascinating? Lol
Seems clear to me that you CAN measure the one-way speed of light. The light travels along a linear path with distance markers. Count the frames, measure how far the light travelled, and do the math. If the tiny variation in distance from the light to the camera (or in the lens, etc) would slightly stretch the timing, then adjust for it with the math - these are known variables! It's true that by the time the first few frames of light movement actually gets to the camera, the experiment might already be over. But that just means all frames are equally delayed (no matter what the speed is from experiment to camera). In my view, how can we say this is not an accurate way to measure the one-way speed of light? If the key factor is EXACT speed, then forget about it. Nothing can ever be measured EXACTLY.
10:54 the final footage. You’re welcome
Edit: Thanks for the likes
You're*
@@m4271_ thanks
Our savior
Thank you so much
Ty
World's fastest camera : 10 trillion fps
Also World's fastest camera : *runs on Windows 7*
So happy someone else caught this!
Matthew Chu I saw it too! How funny!
Windows 7 is just that awesome.
Windows 7 is fast, so I don't see the issue here ;)
Lol. American military uses Windows Xp
Dan and Gav’s stunned silence after watching the 10 trillion frame shot says a lot
This has to be the coolest thing I have ever seen in my entire life.
Too bad it's fake lol
@@AndrewWhite6969 No it's not. Why would you think it's fake?
@@tarmoheinonen4645 nothing in the universe can cross the speed of light.
But in order to capture the speed of light you need a camera whose lens can capture photoes otherwise open and close faster than speed of light.
So its impossible
Them: this is the slowest we’ll get to the speed of light
Me, with big brain: *video at 0.25*
Recording the 0.25x version
And playing it in 0.25x
@@eduardispas8846 recording your 1/16 speed version and playing it in 0.25
Eduard Ispas just do this for a couple times
@@modle4108 recording your version and playing it at 0.25... *huge brain*
-
czcams.com/video/WCqJiGTM_54/video.html
For reference: if you film one second with this camera, playback in 30FPS will give you more than 10,000 years of footage
A real oof right there
Cool frame of reference. thanks
TRAS̸H DØVE legit?
5,000 years at 60fps?
sk0sH pretty sure game fps is different, if you play uncapped at 600fps your game wouldn’t be slow mo..
Really curious how they actually measure it, this is way faster than any existing microprocessor clock cycle.
The idea is based on a "streak camera", but extended in to 2D instead of 1D. They take a single image which captures some tiny duration of light propagation, but its time domain is spread across a spatial domain, so they essentially turn time into space, so it does not require an ultrafast processor. The resulting video is produced after the fact, based on the data captured.
@@BrianPeirisif this is correct, this is incredible. I need to go and look this up. I'm constantly amazed at the creativity of inventions.
@@bladepanthera Since we can't actually measure the speed of light atm that is the closest thing we can do, guestimate. Still mighty impressive what a gigabrain thought that up.
Crazy to think this is 4 years old. I remember my mind being blown watching this. Good ol dorm days.
Watch this in 0.25 speed
You are now faster than light
Way to beat the system
So at .25 speed, plus traveling in my car at 88 mph, then throw my phone at my windshield.... 💥💥💥
I went back in time and did it again. Now I'm stuck in a loop. Help/
@@blueshit199 didn't i saw this comment before? OH HELP I'M IN LOOP
Wouldn’t that be slower than light?
Ok now u will wonder what the comment was and the replies don’t make any sense
Good one
You ain’t wrong
Not as fast as my weiner dog can pee on the carpet.
Yeah, I hate it then they're *droping.*
Still not as fast as tha weekend pass
When they said that if you fired a bullet through the same frame it would take years to get to the other side, I think that finally put the speed of light into a proper perspective for me
When you did the bullet comparison, really put the speed into perspective. Cheers guys 👍👍
People in 3020 "mom, I can't even play, my pc makes only 10 trillion fps"
Gameplay faster than your control 😂
By that time there won’t be women
DaDolphin 69 more probable that there won‘t be any men
Pfft the human eye can only detect 500 billion fps anyway
Robert Price
Where did you get this info?
Guys they did it. They reached maximum slow mo.
I played the video at .25 speed so I actually reached max slow mo
In theory
Nope the max slo mo is stopping time itself.
Very true I was wrong
Impossible
Light bouncing around that chaos chamber was amazing.
That's not no computer simulation. That is our universe. Doing that.
It would have been nice to hear what physicists are hoping to discover or what new understanding they're seeking from these experiments.
Exactly my thought! They could not have built all that just for taking these videos.
Slomo Guys: We filmed the speed of light
VSauce: but can you film the speed of dark?
Dunnnn dun dunnn
DUN DUN DUNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
@@alessandrowda Yes.
The speed of dark is the speed of light going backwards.
No
Vsauce: Or did we.
Dun dun dunnn
Can we just take a second to realize how truly insane this technology is
That would take approximately 31,000 years
@@djaypop1 lolll
No. I am far too busy.
Sorry for everyone too busy I understand
I’ll give you a picosecond
We need a slow-mo of the shoe cover bins working
Crazy that's how the Flash experiences time while running the speed of light. He must be millions of mental years old.
11:01 content you came for
-------------------
edit: thanks for 5k likes.
Thank
You
Thanks
Spasibo!
Thx
Bless your soul
At this speed, playing back a clock changing 1 second, at 30 fps, would take 10570 years!
Now that is an under rated comment. I feel ya.
wow
crazy perspective, thanks for doing the math 🙏
Wow
Oh, great
This is Four years old and i discovered it just today. Shame on me. Its so amazing!
These videos are getting crazier every time I watch one
Watching light at such a low speed but then realising that it's still coming out of my screen at the actual speed of light.
Light one up, toke it down, contemplate the meaning of life and the universe :D
😂😂😂
Woah bro
You're hurting my brain
Theory of Relativity. No matter how you look at it, lights always at lightspeed, no faster, no slower.
I don’t think many people realise how fast 10 trillion frames per second really is.
Let me give you some perspective-
In 1 second the camera will capture 10,000,000,000,000 frames. Doing the math, (at regular speed 30fps) that amounts to an almost incomprehensible
10,570 YEARS worth of footage!
And that is just in 1 second.
Nerd. Jk that's really cool
Quick maths
I know it’s an old meme
@Andy your phone does, the backlight of your display sends out photons through the piece of glass of your phone(or monitor) that you rely on to view your content.
Andy God creates this. Only God could, humans could never.
@@mishxalhey7319 don't let god get in to my phone 😡
Absolutely brilliant fellas cheers, the young fella showing you the procedure is very smart & switched on and it does my heart well to see the next generation of scientists working.
Thank you
That's really mindblowing that we came all the way from the caves to seeing light slow motion with mechanical eyes.
11:00 is when it really happens
Thank you :)
Thanks
Messiah
You deserve more 👍🏻
Omg thank you~
2011: Popping A giant Red Water Balloon in slow Motion
2019: *Filming the speed of light at 10 trillion Fps*
P-progress
Stonks for sure
what a long way
Yea
thats what video i came from
Veritassium: we can't measure the speed of light.
Slomo guys: we just did
That was incredible. Super cool. Thanks for being this to the public.
Light: I am the fastest in the universe
Slow-mo guys: We are about to end this photon’s whole career
Digvijay Bhandari career*
aside from his spelling mistake, this should be on the top comment.
Carrier? Thats a vehicle right?
Cool personification.
NeroArrow PL Thanks! I am not good at english.
Finally I've seen the speed of light through my own eyes, That's one thing crossed on my to do list
If you want to drain your credit card go right ahead
Don’t you see how the speed of light everyday
donald wilson yeah - this is literally not the actual speed of light
@Junky DIY guy
r/iamverystupid
@@adamfra64 r/ihavereddit
This experiment is good for the study of Light and Lazers. Thank you so much. I'm sure you have gone in depth to eloborate extensively, scientific points.
11:37 "On this scale of time, if we fired a bullet through this frame, it would take a years to go from one side to the other". The best part of this video 😮
EMK that part blew my mind
Got me too
to be exactly accurate 317,098 calendar years
Is flash that faster?
Let’s see. Based on the legend that’s about 17mm across; 50 light-picoseconds is about 15mm. So call it 16mm, which is 0.05 ft. A bullet traveling at 2500 ft/sec could thus travel that distance in 0.00002 seconds. Which is 20 microseconds, 20,000 nanoseconds, or 20,000,000 picoseconds. This video is slowed down to about 10 picoseconds per second so it would take about 2,000,000 seconds for the bullet to go by, which is “only” a bit over 23 days.
and to think we have to measure the universe in a scale called “light years”, makes you really think about how enormous the universe actually is.
It gets even more mind-blowing when you think about the fact that the observable universe is 93 billion light years across. Keep in mind that it's only the observable part.
@@swanihilator6748 yep, i personally believe that matter goes on forever. Considering it would be scientifically impossible for matter itself to have an end.
@@zxckon It goes on forever. But, then there's not enough heat displacement throughout the universe, and all life that relies on heat in some way ceases to exist.
@@swanihilator6748 And to think there are billions upon billions of 'Earth-like' planets that are within observable galaxies. I mean, the universe is so massive it can take several decades to reach one point to another, even while traveling at light speed. Yet, there are still imbeciles who 'refute' the existence of extraterrestrial species.
Seems like most people think that the universe is like the size of our solar system times a million 🤣
Yeah...MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH BIGGER..
And then that times 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. And then A LOOOOOOT more. The Earth is so small, it almost doesn't even exist.
Kind of mind blowing to see how fast light is moving and to realize we are so far from the sun that it takes 8 minutes for the light to get here. I don’t think my brain can fully grasp that kind of distance.
He’s had you over here lads. You’ve gone off and he’s done an 8 hour 8-Bit programme and packaged as capturing the speed of light
"woman found her lost wedding dress"
gets to the news.
"we filmed the speed of light"
...
r/iam14andthisisdeep
@douglas wahid The guy with the anime shirt that the sjws bullied till NASA forced him to give a public apology? That alone shows why sjws are the scum of the Earth and should be thrown out of an airplane.
How is THIS not in the news!?!?!?
douglas wahid source?
Your Gouvernment and The Press: keeping everyone stupid for another thousand years! You can count on us...
You guys always take it one step further don't you.
That was a slow step
Thats what success is made of
Well, MIT did it 7 years ago. czcams.com/video/EtsXgODHMWk/video.html
Good luck trying to find something faster
2 years from now they'll be filming the inside of a black hole in slow mo.
Incredible frames!
I wish I could see somehow what happens at normal speed first, then appreciate the slow mode to better understand the dynamics of the tiny beam of light.
Maybe was just impossible to do.
Thank you Slow Mo’s!!
At normal speed it just looked like a beam of light directed at the object because we couldn't see it pulsing at hundreds of millions of times a second (or whatever the rate was) without the camera.
My mind is blown... I can't even comprehend that
Them: 10 000 000 000 000 FPS
CZcams: 360p take it or leave it
Ye I know I just thought this kind of comment would be a little funny
@M 42 Stop ruining the fun.We aren't that stupid to differentiate between a joke and a true fact.
More like: 60 FPS
If thats true than
You: too poor to afford good internet
Me: 1080p easy bcs im not poor
@@leno7492 watch in 1440p on mobile its better
This camera just might be able to capture my ex jumping to conclusions
bwhahahahahah!
😂💀
Lmao
🤣🤣🤣🤣
😆
Seeing the way light behaves on the smallest scale we can conceive of really does feel like forbidden knowledge
Tell me we have finally measured speed of light, without any flaws.
1:09 what a legend, running windows 7.
Windows 7 is very stable tho?
@@Rohxx420 did I say that it is unstable?
@@rework3097 your implying that there's a reason he's a legend for using that OS, plenty of people use it so whys he a legend?
@@Rohxx420 well all those people are legends :)
@@Rohxx420 cuz I love win 7
The fact that nowadays i can just casually sit in my kitchen and watch how LIGHT MOVES blows my mind and makes me thankful to live in this era
and yet with all the science that we know , no one has discovered a solution to trafic jam !!!!
@@actesaadl8052 i think the solution is good and available public transportation and discouraging people from owning cars.
Or nuclear weapons 😂
@@justsomerandomname2067 both solutions are good only in North Kores
@@actesaadl8052 why? (Obviously only asking about the first solution)
can't imagine life without a car, "here fuel is ~0.6 $/ Gallon "
We are looking into the eyes of God. Humans weren’t supposed to see this.
LOVE YOU GUYS! But 11:50, that segment, dudes....that was AMAZING!!! I wouldn't have been able to act quite as calm as you guys
Came for the light-speed camera, stayed for the shoe covering technology.
They should have filmed that in SlowMo, its one frame from bare show to covered one!
Its fake if you know how camera works its impossible, if its true then world fastest thing is right is this camera not light anymore.
@@irigm6132 I'm pretty sure it's not just one lens, it's at least 5-6 to a ton more synchronized so perfectly against a mirror it looks like one camera. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong
@@clashmastr9895 when light pass through liquid it effect it's speed but still very much faster than anything in the world. If they had used multiple lenses and liquid many more transparent material still camera system is not fast enough to catch it, camera internal system which create frame works on electronic devices and speed of electron are too slow compare to light. This is a joke
A friend of mine *insists* on taking your shoes off when walking on his living room rug - one of those should shut him up.
Gav: Is this camera capable of filming the speed of light?
guy: no
video ends
*bad ending 1*
*YOU DIED*
yes
Please insert more quarters and try again.
LMFAO
If you told me this was an april fools joke I'd believe you. The universe never ceases to bewilder me.
Coolest thing I've seen on CZcams in a long time no pun intended. I need Brian Green's comments on this relative to time dilation
Top 10 craziest video titles that aren't clickbait
right?! i was ready for the rick roll...
Yes
I hope they'll publish something like this on 1st of April and people will think it's joke
Mmmm *luna* mmmmm
Suddenly everyone in the comments has a PhD in Physics and simply can't enjoy a video.
Brandon how about you ignore it and enjoy it
Like you?
Lmfao your my favorite person Brandon
Idk what I’m looking at I just wanted to see how fast the speed of light looked like
Welcome to the internet in current year.
You really walked the Planck to show us this otherworldly and surreal footage!
honestly this is just insane!!! Thank you - it's magic.
Fastest camera in the world truly a grand accomplishment for humans
Windows 7 running it
I bet that only us knew that
Windows 7 is the best OS Microsoft has made, it's been downhill for them ever since. Be glad it wasn't a windows 8 which is by far the worst OS to exist.
Obviously, the crude Mac rip off had nothing whatsoever to do with it, or could have been done just as well with a Vic-20.
TheZombiesAreComing - Best Windows OS isn’t saying much. They never bothered ripping off the best parts of the Mac.
@@Ketoswammy
That is because Macs are made by Apple and Apple keep their products extremely minimalistic. There is literary nothing worth copying as doing so would be a downgrade due to removing features to fit the Apple theme.
This is by far the best CZcams originals and is free to watch
Awesome content
i agree
I also agree
don't give em' ideas rak :D i like free stuff
rakhi mondal How much did CZcams pay you to say that?
and God can move faster than that, how can the created be faster than the creator
Seeing these clips of light bouncing around somehow reminds me how much time I'm wasting in my life.
epic ending...
gav:i'm sold
dan:yup
dan n' gav in unison:we'll take two.
Supereons
Eons
Megaannums
Myriaannums
Millennia
Centuries
Decades
Years
Months
Weeks
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
Milliseconds
Microseconds
Nanoseconds
Picoseconds
Femtoseconds
Attoseconds
Zeptoseconds
Yoctoseconds
Planck time.
Cool!
Jesus
When would u use yoctoseconds😂
It is the shortest lifetime ever recorded.
Too much little time
"I feel like no human should have seen this." Me sitting here being the 20 millionth viewer*
Śpectrę_A-259 you can do it on the 25 millionth viewer
Lol
Haha that's what i thought.
Juju
I’m the 22,168,389 viewer and I approve
I remember the 70s and 80s.
Black holes were purely theoretical, everyone knew we would never, ever ne able to see one. Atoms were far too small to ever be seen, controlled nuclear fusion was pure silliness and the idea that one day we would be able to take a video of a beam of light as it travels along didn't even enter the minds of anyone except a few crazy people who had taken some exceptional acid or shrooms.
Yes we didn't get flying cars or bacofoil suits, but the future we're living in has some really cool stuff in it that I'm really enjoying.
Maybe I can use this to film the impatient driver's reaction time behind me when the green light turns on
the craziest thing is, this isn’t the speed of light. it’s the speed of light hitting the object and then reaching the camera.
I think you're right that the light has to bounce off the milk and scatter towards the camera which takes additional time, but that's happening continuously as the beam travels from left to right so although there is an additional delay, I don't think it changes the overall *rate*. Therefore I disagree, I think we are actually seeing "the speed of light".
its simple just divide by 2
My mind is now rattling!
*bam , in the face !*
No, watch the video
The FASTEST thing recorded at SLOWEST speed is the GREATEST thing ever....
I think you’re overreacting
Screenshot this and post it to r/im14andthisisdeep to get 7 upvotes.
Project Entertainment Why it’s dope
"Ackshually" it's the fastest thing at the fastest recording speed...THEN it's slowed down when played back.
I think this is the best video I've ever watched on youtube. But then, I am a star trek fan.
Keep in mind that it's the reflection that arrive to the camera. Due light nature, we cant see it if a fraction doesnt reflect to the camera. That is the reason for the 'strange shape'.
I'd like to see a double-slit experiment filmed at 10 trillion FPS :-)
>Has World's fastest camera
>Uses Windows Vista
Priorities
Upgrading from Vista should be the top priority.
Vista and windows 7 are basically more optimised to perform more demanding tasks than their successors.
I would argue that if it ain't broke, it don't need fixing. Windows Vista is unoptimized and was buggy, but from what I've heard, after 4 service packs it's miles better than its initial release, which everyone thinks it still is today.
There are still places out in the wild using pre windows 95 Operating Systems. Generally for very specialised uses the software that does what they want doing is working just fine with the older hardware and they don't need a better OS so going to the hassle of re-writing and bug hunting what they're actually running o the hardware is unnecessary in the extreme. There are even hardware manufacturers that specialize in supply custom hardware thats compatible with ancient operating systems.
darthkarl99 adding on to that, a large portion of the us military (getting this all from infographics show) uses very old versions of windows. And upgrading would be dangerous. (Not directly quoted btw)
Gav: This is something no human should have seen.
Also Gav: Let's put it on CZcams!
6.4 million humans later...
The bullet comparison was nuts!👍🏽
Stunning - And such a nice chap to entertain your interest
I wanna see that shoe cover technology in slowmo
What"shoe cover texhnology"?
@@Bluemansonic 00:47
literally what i did when i saw it, set it to .25 speed just to see heh
@@greenmist3182 still to fast
I want to see Gav and Dan walk out of the building still wearing those shoe coverings.
Expert: Oh, this is the worlds fastest camera
Me being the intellectual that i am: *Looks pretty still to me*
Don’t ever use the word smart with me
@@NatesFilmTutorials ok
😂😂
@@NatesFilmTutorials that's smart
HAH 💀😂
Dan was left hanging at the beginning with that handshake with the professor and I can’t stop thinking about it
I believe we are all light and energy. I would focus the 10 Trillion FPS "camera" on people as they are dying to see what it captures.
My dad left in the blink of an eye. I'd like to see that in slow-mo.
Just like karen and the kids
Plz come back
@@Artur_without_the_H maybe your this persons dad xD
Bad childhood. Good life.
TFW you can't get the milk
In that frame of the slow-mo, you can see your dad slowly raise both his middle fingers before he vanishes in the blink of an eye.