Deobandis On Trial: Misquoting Ibn Taymiyyah (AlIslam Productions, Hanafi Fiqh Channel)
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 07. 2024
- 0:42 - Sitting on the throne and leaving a space of 4 fingers empty
2:58 - Sitting on the throne and leaving a space for the Prophet ﷺ
4:12 - Ibn al-Qayyim’s poetry affirming sitting for Allāh?
6:19 - Ibn al-Qayyim misquoted al-Ṭabarī?
12:01 - Misquoting Bayān Talbīs al-Jahmīyyah regarding “direction” jihah and ”body” (jism)
15:59 - Six directions and limits
19:57 - Did Ibn Taymīyyah say Allāh is heavy?
22:18 - Does Ibn Taymīyyah affirm Allāh touching impurities?
23:46 - Ibn Taymīyyah quoting the Bible
25:55 - Does Ibn Taymīyyah affirm Allāh sitting on the Kursī?
A collection of Deobandīs misquoting Ibn Taymīyyah and Ibn al-Qayyim.
#hanafifiqhchannel
#ibntaymiyyah
#aqeedah
#deobandi
0:42 - Sitting on the throne and leaving a space of 4 fingers empty
2:58 - Sitting on the throne and leaving a space for the Prophet ﷺ
4:12 - Ibn al-Qayyim’s poetry affirming sitting for Allāh?
6:19 - Ibn al-Qayyim misquoted al-Ṭabarī?
12:01 - Misquoting Bayān Talbīs al-Jahmīyyah regarding “direction” jihah and ”body” (jism)
15:59 - Six directions and limits
19:57 - Did Ibn Taymīyyah say Allāh is heavy?
22:18 - Does Ibn Taymīyyah affirm Allāh touching impurities?
23:46 - Ibn Taymīyyah quoting the Bible
25:55 - Does Ibn Taymīyyah affirm Allāh sitting on the Kursī?
This is why I left the Deobandis two years ago and became Salafi in Aqidah....Wallahi they are Liars..Liars!!!!
There are many of us like this alhumdulillah. May Allah grant you success.
@@ExtremeShezsalam brothers, I go to a tableegh jama’at mosque because its the closest one to my house. I have met many pious brothers there and I wish to help them. Some of them are very old but I still wish to guide them towards better scholars may Allah guide us all. They are proudly deobandi and think salafis have problems. But I feel like its ignorance and not malicious intent as they are much more practising then the average in this country. Anyway any general tips for this case? Any Urdu videos that explain to them the truth?
@@mohamada2177 same here in India bro😢
@@mohamada2177 Why do you call them pious? Can you define piety in regards to the Shari'ah?
I don't know Urdu, my bother. May Allah grant you success.
Google Salafi Research Institute, they have a number of refutations on Deobandis you can translate. May Allah grant you success.
For example;
A concerning issue that have been found in Tablighi Nisāb / Fazaail-e-Aamaal.
From Fazaail-e-Aamaal (Virtues of Charity): A virtuous man once *sat down near the grave of a generous person and related that he needed some Deenaars (money) to help a beggar. In the night, he saw the man of the grave in his dream*, who directed the virtuous man to go to his house where in a corner lay buried five hundred Deenaars, which he should give it to the beggar. Next morning, the man visited the house of the man in the grave, spoke to the family members and thus, the Deenaars were found. The man told the family members to keep the wealth for they were legal successors of the wealth. But they refused saying that it was shameful for them that *their ancestor could be generous even after his death and they could not be during their life.* The Deenars were thus, given to the beggar but the beggar only took half a Deenar.
*Reference:* Fazaail-e-Aamaal, (Eng. Trans.), Virtues of Charity, Chapter.7, story no.24, p.195-196 (New Edition 1982, Published by Dini Book Depot -Delhi).
There is no clarification, before or after this story that such-and such belief is not true, and that this story is only meant to encourage charity. Instead, what is found is the *following , comment by Moulana Zakariyyah* “The thing to be _noted and considered in the above story is as to who was most generous The deceased or his family or the beggar?_
_In our view, the beggar was most generous as in spite of his needs, he did not take more than half of a Deenar.” [end quote]_
Can a just person, after reading this comment, honestly say that a commoner to whom such stories are read, will only take encouragement for righteous actions from it, and not form a misguided opinion about the ability of the dead righteous to perform righteous acts and benefit the living? *Rather, this story helps formulate the belief, and Moulana Zakariyyah’s comment re-enforce it!*
*The idea that benefits may be received from the grave is the basic premise for grave worship.* And we have seen already the dangers of attachment to graves, and the severe warning by Allah's Messenger (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wassallam) against taking graves as places of worship.
As for the intent of Moulana Zakariyyah, none can argue, after reading his comment, that such stories are not meant to teach a particular Aqeedah, especially since he himself approves, *“The same benefit which was received from the Faqir's physical life will be acquired from his grave.”* _Mashaikh-e-Chist (Eng. Trans.) p.211_
Above was taken from the following research: *Advice to those who participate in dawah along with the Tableeghi Jamaat* by Sajid A. Kayum
@@mohamada2177 Yes brother, May Allah help us to correct thier aqeedas.
Subhanallah a laymen like me would’ve been fooled this is why the ulema told us to abandon and boycott ahlul bid’ah because they spread these type of doubts which our filled with lies jazallahu khair
Assalamu alaikum young brother, welcome back, may Allah reward you for your efforts in spreading the truth ameen
SubhanAllah. He accused Imam Ibnul Qayyim of Misquoting while he*s misquoting himself multiple times ibnul qayyim and ibn taymiyyah
I’ve notice yasir al hanafi is always slandering the salafi dawah and scholars. what’s his problem subhanallah
Same problem as other ahlul biddah.
#AllFitnaProduction
1:47 😭😭😭😭😭😭do these asharis even try in their lies anymore... its like they stopped putting effort in making it believable. maulana didnt even erase the "fi qawlih" he literally just left it there for everyone to see😭😭😭😭😭
Been waiting for this one for a minute. BarakAllahfeekum big bro.
Ibrāhīm brother
May Allah bless you so much and increase you in knowledge
Ibn Taymiyyah is writing to refute the Jahmiyah and this deobandi is taking offense lol comedy 😂
Because the likes of him are the ones being refuted
@@mustafao477 I know right
الله يبارك فيكم شيخنا
Excellent video, may Allah reward you.
Ma sha Allah excellent, keep up the good and beneficial work carry on exposing these Deobandi liars may Allah the Most High bless you akhi
Barakallahu feeek akhi 💓💓💓
جزاك الله كل خير في الدنياء والآخرة
hasbuna llah wa nemal wakil jazaka llahu kheir for refuting them
I simply can't stand these lies against scholars . I think deobandis gone crazy now to prove their misguidance 😂
These people are such disgusting liars, they have no shame
Barakallahu feekum
The reason for lying against Ibn Taymiyya (RA) is his refutation of jahamees. These deobandis are actually jahamees so they are bound to defend their forefather, jahm ibn safwaan.
you will see them saying so many praise worthy statements for Imam Abu Hanifa (RA) but they out rightly reject his aqeedah.
#AllBatilProductions, May Allah guide them
Honestly, I respect imam ibn taymiyyah even more than before now, it's as if he's written this book to refute the maulana sahib himself. The moulana sahib simply sounds like the people who are being refuted here
Jazkallahukhair
He is back! Deobandis, Asharis and all other Mubtada's beware
BaarakAllahu feek
May Allah reward you akhi
JazakAllahKhair excellent video. I have a request for your upcoming videos.
Can you make a video on the Actions of Allah (Subhanahu wa ta’ala) and what the Salaf had to say about them.
I hear people say and give quotes from the Salaf that the actions of Allah (Subhanahu wa ta’ala) are not Muhadth (reoccurring) and that the meaning of muhadth is created.
Also on the topic of Ibn Taymiyyah rahimahullah I’ve heard people say that he attributes size to Allah (Subhanahu wa ta’ala) Ik you somewhat touched on that in this video but I’d like to know if this is true or where this notion came from.
*Allāh’s actions*
Shaykh Sulṭān al-ʿUmayrī has good explanations of this topic in his explanation of al-Wāsiṭīyyah, as well as Shaykh ʿAbdullāh al-ʿUjayrī in his explanation of al-Tadmurīyyah. Allāh’s speech is the most discussed and differed upon attribute where ṣifāt al-ikhtīyārīyyah are discussed, so I’d recommend watching Shaykh Sulṭān al-ʿUmayrī’s videos on Allāh’s speech if you know Arabic.
*The word “size” and it’s attribution to Ibn Taymīyyah:*
As is the habit of today’s Ashʾarī-wannabes of the English speaking world, they utilise words by which they intend to reject what Allāh affirms for Himself - like the word “size”, and they deceive the ignorant and gullible through this word and make them imagine this means Allāh is a body, because only bodies have sizes.
With regard to this word “size”, then the reality is that there is nothing that exists except that it must be “dhū qadr” and “dhū ṣifah” which means it must have a true and real existence - instead of a mere imagined conceptual one - that is characterised with attributes. And the Jahmīyyah denied this for Allāh, because they claim this necessitates a size and therefore a body (jism), and this means that they do not in reality, affirm a “dhāt” for Allāh.
But since attributes cannot exist on their own (separate from an essence), Allāh must have a “dhāt”, and this “dhāt” must have a true and real existence, beyond just a concept in the mind. And so “dhū qadr” means that this dhāt of Allāh (His Essence) has a real and true existence, and “dhū ṣifah” means that this dhāt (Essence) is described with Attributes.
Such ridiculous attributions come from Ashʾarī-wannabes due to their ignorance of theological terminology when discussing Allāh’s characteristics, especially regarding Ibn Taymīyyah, which is why they make such rookie mistakes.
@@ibmsulaymani JazakAllahKhair now I understand the bit about “size”. I actually got that from the orientalist Jon Hoover (since I’m limited in my access to english content on Ibn Taymiyyah’s works).
As for Allah’s actions JazakAllahKhair for the references I’ll check them out, I might have a harder time listening to shaykh Abdullah Al Ujayri since I’m not good with ‘Amiyyah or accents but if shaykh Sultan Al ‘Umayri speaks mainly in Fus7a then It will be easier for me to understand.
But on that note do you have any particular videos or playlists for me to check out by those people? since I don’t know what to search up especially if I have to search for their content in Arabic.
JazakAllahKhair / BarakAllahuFeek for your efforts and response.
czcams.com/play/PLv9apNNDOatwDQFW2vxOzuX89GnH7SjEW.html&feature=shared
czcams.com/video/4iMKIE5TkmM/video.htmlfeature=shared
czcams.com/video/SxX3ZbokmQc/video.htmlfeature=shared
czcams.com/video/CxSyKd3ayaU/video.htmlfeature=shared
@@ibmsulaymani JazakAllahKhair / BarakAllahFeek
alhamdulillah
barakaAllahufeek
Deobandits are the biggest fitnah in subcontinent and it's spreading throughout the world through another bidah of Tableeghi Jamaah ,,the spread of kufriya ideology wahdatul wajood is now widespread among the masses. May Allah azzawajal protect us all from every fitnah out there..
prove that wahadul wajood is belief of deobandis
@@zulqarnainmehmoodhanbli1016 aren't your akaabeer is maturidi in beleif
@@Striker_242 yes but matrudi never believed in wahatal wajood
@@zulqarnainmehmoodhanbli1016 read your scholar books 🤡
@@zulqarnainmehmoodhanbli1016
Lmao ask your scholars. If they agree that the founder of deoband, Emdatullah Muhazir Maqqi used to believe in Wahdatul Wujud
Genuinely puzzled as to why somebody would lie about such issues. Sunk cost fallacy lol
I am ex deobandi keep exposing these people.
Assalamualaikum wa rahmatullah akhi, if you need anyone with good English to help with subtitle voices I'd be more than happy to help. Since you're using the robotic voice now.
See too many Salafis cozying up to Deobandi's because they oppose Barelvi's in the subcontinent. Their aqeedah is Maturidi, they follow Sufi turuq, their founders whom they revere, were staunch Sufis, such as Anwar Shah Kashmiri, who approved of taking benefits from the people of the graves and Ashraf Ali Thanawi who in his poems did istigatha with Nabi alayhi salat wa'salam. Do not be deceived by their "moderate" approach, if you are consistent in your manhaj then you will know they are people of innovation to the bone. BarakAllah Feek, Ustadh Ibrahim.
حَدَّثَنِي زُهَيْرُ بْنُ حَرْبٍ، حَدَّثَنَا يَعْقُوبُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبِي، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، عَنْ عَطَاءِ بْنِ يَزِيدَ اللَّيْثِيِّ، أَنَّ أَبَا هُرَيْرَةَ،
أَخْبَرَهُ أَنَّ نَاسًا قَالُوا لِرَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ هَلْ نَرَى رَبَّنَا يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ” هَلْ تُضَارُّونَ فِي رُؤْيَةِ الْقَمَرِ لَيْلَةَ الْبَدْرِ ” . قَالُوا لاَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ . قَالَ
” هَلْ تُضَارُّونَ فِي الشَّمْسِ لَيْسَ دُونَهَا سَحَابٌ ” . قَالُوا لاَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ . قَالَ ” فَإِنَّكُمْ تَرَوْنَهُ كَذَلِكَ يَجْمَعُ اللَّهُ النَّاسَ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ فَيَقُولُ مَنْ كَانَ يَعْبُدُ شَيْئًا فَلْيَتَّبِعْهُ
Abu Hurairah reported: The people said to the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ): “Messenger of Allah, shall we see our Lord on the Day of Resurrection?”
The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: “Do you feel any trouble in seeing the moon on the night when it is full?”
They said: “O Messenger of Allah, no.”
The Messenger further said: “Do you feel any trouble in seeing the sun, when there is no cloud over it?”
They said: “O Messenger of Allah. no.”
So he said: “Verily you will see Him like this (as you see the sun and the moon). Allah will gather people on the Day of Resurrection and say: Let every person follow what they worshipped.”
[Saheeh Muslim, Kitāb al-Imān, no. 182. See also At-Tirmidhi, no. 3248]
JazakAllah Khair for your efforts in defending the truth and exposing these liars. Absolute Deobandi clown show.
Imagine being raised on Yaum Al Qiyamah and to your name, you have the flesh of Ibn Taymiya رحمه الله that you've consumed by lying against him.
Yasir anti hanafi is up for a rude awakening.
there are many deobandis who praise and defend ibne thaymiyyah not all are like them like abul hassan ali nadwi,molana sajid khan naqashbandi, mufti yasir nadeem al wajidi praise and defend ibne taymiyyah ra
Jazakallahu khairan
Mawlanas are back!
I remember watching a video of knowledge north of them lying about Abu Hanifa
This attribute of Allāh’s Face is affirmed in the Book of the Almighty in a few verses:
كُلُّ مَنْ عَلَيْهَا فَانٍ
وَيَبْقَىٰ وَجْهُ رَبِّكَ ذُو الْجَلَالِ وَالْإِكْرَامِ
“Everyone upon the earth will perish, and the Face of your Lord full of Majesty and Honour will abide forever.”
[Ar-Rahmān: 26-27]
وَلَا تَدْعُ مَعَ اللَّهِ إِلَٰهًا آخَرَ ۘ لَا إِلَٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ ۚ كُلُّ شَيْءٍ هَالِكٌ إِلَّا وَجْهَهُ ۚ لَهُ الْحُكْمُ وَإِلَيْهِ تُرْجَعُونَ - 28:88
“And do not invoke with Allah another deity. There is no deity except Him. Everything will be destroyed except His Face. His is the judgement, and to Him you will be returned.”
[Al-Qasas: 88]
Shameless innovator this guy is
Alhumdulliah, this is not the first time they have been refuted. Sheikh abudal Rahman refuted them on this matter with multiple videos, sheikh demashik also made videos on CZcams , and sheikh challenged him on debating . There are many other videos by other brothers! Allah will keep exposing these lyers! Till they apologise openly . Ma Allah guide them
They don't fear Allah that they lie about great scholars
Likewise there are other ahādeeth which prove that Allāh has a Face:
حَدَّثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْعَزِيزِ بْنُ عَبْدِ الصَّمَدِ، عَنْ أَبِي عِمْرَانَ، عَنْ أَبِي بَكْرِ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ قَيْسٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ
“ جَنَّتَانِ مِنْ فِضَّةٍ آنِيَتُهُمَا وَمَا فِيهِمَا، وَجَنَّتَانِ مِنْ ذَهَبٍ آنِيَتُهُمَا وَمَا فِيهِمَا، وَمَا بَيْنَ الْقَوْمِ وَبَيْنَ أَنْ يَنْظُرُوا إِلَى رَبِّهِمْ إِلاَّ رِدَاءُ الْكِبْرِ عَلَى وَجْهِهِ فِي جَنَّةِ عَدْنٍ ”.
Narrated `Abdullah bin Qais narrated that the Prophet (ﷺ) said: “There will be two gardens of silver and all the utensils and whatever is therein will be of silver. And two gardens of gold, and its utensils and whatever therein will be of gold. There will be nothing to prevent the people from seeing their Lord except the cover of Majesty over His Face in the Paradise of Eden (eternal bliss).” [Saheeh Al-Bukhāri in Kitāb at-Tawheed, no. 7444. Saheeh Muslim, Kitāb al-Imān, no. 296]
This why you don't take knowledge from those who aren't qualified to teach. Learn under a known scholar and don't rely on youtube and books alone.
This people (callers towards blindness/ misguidance & their clueless followers from ignorant Muslims ) made their mazhabs as new religion.... Besides religion of ALLAH and his prophet saw !
La'nat on these deobandits... Their entire creed is based on taqiyya
Despite the differences you have against your opponents it’s sick and disgusting to lie.
However opposed I am to Razi, Baqillani, Fawrak etc for their Ashari aqeedah, I wouldn’t ever lie against them.
The whole earth will be in His grip on the Day of Resurrection, and the heavens will be rolled up in His right hand” (Q. 39:67). Ibn Taymiyya explains that the whole world in the hand of God is smaller than a chick pea in one of our hands. With such an image in mind, it is not difficult to imagine God located above a spherical earth from any point on its surface because God completely surrounds it.
Ibn Taymiyya believes Allah is a body.
We see Ibn Taymīyyah’s position clearly explained in all of his well known books and his position is that the use of the word body (jism) in both affirmation and negation is a reprehensible bidʾah (innovation) in the religion. I can bring only a small sample of quotes here.
• Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymīyyah said:
*❝As for the word body (jism), it is an innovation (bidʾah) in both negation or affirmation, there is not in the Book or the Sunnah and nor the saying of any of the Salaf of the Ummah and it's leading Imāms who applied the word jism with respect to Allāh’s attributes, neither in negation nor in affirmation.❞*
وأمّا اللَّفْظُ فَبِدْعَةٌ نَفْيًا وإثْباتًا، فَلَيْسَ فِي الكِتابِ ولا السُّنَّةِ ولا قَوْلِ أحَدٍ مِن سَلَفِ الأُمَّةِ وأئِمَّتِها إطْلاقُ لَفْظِ «الجِسْمِ» فِي صِفاتِ اللَّهِ تَعالى، لا نَفْيًا ولا إثْباتًا.
📚 (Minhāj al-Sunnah an-Nabawīyyah 2/135)
• Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymīyyah said:
*❝And those who said that He is a body (jism) are of two types: The first: And this is the saying of their scholars - that He is a body but not like the [created] bodies, just like it is said, a dhāt (essence, self) but not like the [created] essences, and mawsoof (described) but not like the [created entities that are] subject to description, and a thing but not like the created things. So these people say that He, in His reality, is not like those besides Him from any angle at all, however this affirmation [of jism] is merely [to indicate that He has a real existence by which He is distinguished [from whatever is besides Him]. Like when we say “mawṣūf” (something being subject to description), then this is an affirmation of a reality that [a thing] can be distinguished by.*
والذين قالوا إنه جسم نوعان: أحدهما: - وهو قول علمائهم - إنه جسم لا كالأجسام، كما يقال ذات لا كالذوات، وموصوف لا كالموصوفات، وقائم بنفسه لا كالقائمات، وشيء لا كالأشياء، فهؤلاء يقولون هو في حقيقته ليس مماثلًا لغيره بوجه من الوجوه، لكن هذا إثبات أن له قدرًا يتميز به، كما إذا قلنا موصوف، فهو إثبات حقيقة يتميز بها
*And as for the second type, they are the majority, those about whom it is narrated that they said: “He is flesh and bones” and similar things to this. This saying of theirs which is the most obvious corruption, if He had been flesh and bones - as it is understood - then what is permissible upon [the created types of] flesh and bone would be permissible upon Him, and this leads to the tamthīl (resemblance to the creation) that Allāh has negated from Himself.*
أما النوع الثاني: وهم الغالبية الذين يحكى عنهم أنهم قالوا: هو لحم وعظم ونحو ذلك. فهؤلاء وإن كان قولهم فاسدًا ظاهر الفساد: إذ لو كان لحمًا وعظمًا، كمل يعقل لجاز عليه ما يجوز على اللحوم والعظام، وهذا من تحصيل التمثيل الذي نفاه الله عن نفسه
*So whoever speaks with this tashbīh (resemblance), which comprises such anthropomorphism (tajsīm), then he has made Him like the [created] bodies which are other than Him, [considering] Him to be greater in status [in this tajsīm], and this is clear and manifest falsehood from both a rational and sharīʾah point of view. And such people are the anthropomorphists (mushabbihah) whom the Salaf have criticised. And they (the Salaf) said: “The mushabbih is the one who says: Seeing like my seeing, and Hand like my hand and Foot like my foot.” And so this is making resemblance in the genus [of a thing], even if that being attributed with resemblance is greater in status than that to which it is being resembled.❞*
فمن قال بالتشبيه المتضمن هذا التجسيم فإنه يجعله من جنس غيره من الأجسام، لكنه أكبر مقدارًا، وهذا باطل ظاهر البطلان شرعًا وعقلًا. وهؤلاء هم «المشبهة» الذين ذمهم السلف، وقالوا: المشبه الذي يقول: بصر كبصري، ويد كيدي، وقدم كقدمي، فإن هذا التشبيه هو في الجنس، وإن كان المشبه أكبر مقدارًا من المشبه به
📚 (Bayān Talbīs al-Jahmīyyah 1/283-285)
• Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymīyyah said:
*❝The leading Imāms of the Sunnah and Ḥadīth never differed in anything of the foundations of their religion. For this reason, not a single one of them said: “Allāh is a body (jism),” and nor “Allāh is not a jism,” rather they rejected the negation when the Jahmites from the Muʾtazilah and others innovated it, and they also rejected the negation of the Jahmites of the attributes, alongside their rejection of those who resembled His attributes with those of His creation. In fact, their rejection of the Jahmīyyah Muʾaṭṭilah was greater than their rejection against the mushabbihah, because the disease of taʾṭīl is greater than the disease of tashbīh.❞*
فإن أئمة السنة والحديث لم يختلفوا في شيء من أصول دينهم. ولهذا لم يقل أحد منهم: إن الله جسم، ولا قال: إن الله ليس بجسم، بل أنكروا النفي لما ابتدعته الجهمية، من المعتزلة وغيرهم، وأنكروا ما نفته الجهمية من الصفات، مع إنكارهم على من شبه صفاته بصفات خلقه، مع أن إنكارهم كان على الجهمية المعطلة أعظم منه على المشبهة، لأن مرض التعطيل أعظم من مرض التشبيه.
📚 (Darʾ al-Taʾāruḍ al-ʿAql wal-Naql 10/306)
• Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymīyyah said:
*❝So it is said to the one who asked about the word “jism” (body): What do you mean by your saying? Do you mean that He is of the genus [of things] found in the creation? If you mean that, then Allāh, the Exalted, has explained in His Book that there is no likeness or equal or rival for Him, and He said: {Is one who creates like one who does not?}. [**16:17**] Hence, the Qurʾān indicates that nothing is like Allāh, neither in His essence nor in His attributes and nor in His actions. So if you mean by the word “jism” that which comprises likeness to anything from the creation, then Allāh is purified of that, and your answer is in the Qurʾān and Sunnah, and when Allāh (in His essence) is not like of the genus of water, or air, and nor the soul that is blown into us, and nor from the genus of Angels, or the celestial orbits, then that He should not be from the genus of the body of man, his flesh, his bones, nerves, flesh, hand, foot, face and other such organs and limbs is even more the case and more befitting. And this type of [affirmation] and its likes which is referred to as tashbīh and tajsīm, all of it is denied in the Book and the Sunnah, and there is not in the Qurʾān, a single ayah which indicates, neither textually, nor apparently, the affirmation of any of that for Allāh.❞*
فيقال لمن سأل بلفظ الجسم: ما تعني بقولك؟ أتعني بذلك أنه من جنس شيء من المخلوقات؟ فإن عنيت ذلك فالله تعالى قد بين في كتابه أنه لا مثل له، ولا كفو له، ولا ند له، وقال: ﴿أفمن يخلق كمن لا يخلق﴾ [النحل ١٧]. فالقرآن يدل على أن الله لا يماثله شيء: لا في ذاته ولا في صفاته ولا في أفعاله: فإن كنت تريد بلفظ الجسم ما يتضمن مماثلة الله لشيء من المخلوقات، فالله منزه عن ذلك، وجوابك في القرآن والسنة. وإذا كان الله ليس من جنس الماء والهواء، ولا الروح المنفوخة فينا، ولا من جنس الملائكة، ولا الأفلاك، فلأن لا يكون من جنس بدن الإنسان ولحمه وعصبه وعظامه، ويده ورجله ووجهه، وغير ذلك من أعضائه وأبعاضه، أولى وأحرى. فهذا الضرب ونحوه، مما قد يسمى تشبيهًا وتجسيمًا، كله منتف في كتاب الله، وليس في كتاب الله آية واحد تدل، لا نصًا ولا ظاهرًا، على إثبات شيء من ذلك لله
📚 (Darʾ al-Taʾāruḍ al-ʿAql wal-Naql 10/307-308)
مجھے نہیں پتا کہ کیا انگلش بول رہے ہیں مگر اک بات پکی پتہ ہے کہ یہ اک گروپ ہے جو دیوبند کو اپنیتشریح کیمطابق بنانا چاہتا ہے اپنی خواہش کیمطابق پاکستان اور ہندوستان کے بعد اب انگلینڈ میں بھی کہ ہمارے پاس دیوبند کی سند ہے ہم جس کو دیوبندی مانیں گے وہ دیو بند ہے ورنہ نہٕں امت کے حال پر رحمکرو اب
Most of deobandi are ashari and Mutazila aqeedah....like Shia rafidahi.....
Nope they are maturidi in creed