'Made In China 2025': Examining the scorecard of Beijing's controversial industrial policy

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 1. 06. 2024
  • With only eight months left until 2025, how much progress has China made towards achieving its 'Made in China 2025' goal. CNA's East Asia Tonight examines the scorecard of the controversial industrial policy.

Komentáře • 218

  • @Tampin111
    @Tampin111 Před 23 dny +53

    Why is it controversial
    You mean China is not allowed to industrialise but the G7 countries can
    What a BS news

    • @alessioskomneos655
      @alessioskomneos655 Před 18 dny

      SG is American dog evident by USA military bases there, ofc they are barking the same narrative as their master

  • @huangzb8060
    @huangzb8060 Před 23 dny +37

    CNA, please get the real experts and not someone who will just propagate the western narratives.....

  • @888YangJi
    @888YangJi Před 23 dny +50

    how is some guy living in Japan an expert for China? Has he even been to China?

  • @believeingood5875
    @believeingood5875 Před 23 dny +36

    There is an old saying in China that if no one is jealous and criticizes you, you are not doing well enough.

  • @leondee918
    @leondee918 Před 23 dny +41

    As far as we can see, China hasn't given a damn whether it is on parr with the US economically, militarily or technologically. China has been planning and working extremely hard to improve its people wellbeing, and the result has been astonishing. If this leads China to surpass the US in the future, so be it. Live and let live

  • @kennyskwong
    @kennyskwong Před 23 dny +62

    Why get an anti-China expert to tell China stories?

    • @BLBJ7
      @BLBJ7 Před 20 dny +6

      Well, don't you know this is CNA channel.

    • @whitemoon5752
      @whitemoon5752 Před 19 dny +1

      That’s because CNA gets funding from US senate.

    • @kennyng2289
      @kennyng2289 Před 17 dny

      US Congress allocated $500 million to media to spread propaganda on China.
      czcams.com/video/VfJKC46L660/video.htmlsi=WN73eCaIZLubL_kV

  • @vlhc4642
    @vlhc4642 Před 23 dny +37

    America's continued occupation of stolen land is controversial.

    • @chopinmack5418
      @chopinmack5418 Před 19 dny

      The US is building a port in Gaza at the moment , preparing to extract Oil from the shore of Gaza !

  • @taiwanstillisntacountry
    @taiwanstillisntacountry Před 24 dny +45

    Never knew CNA was a clone of BBC😂😂😂.
    Gordon Chang is your daddy?
    China is collapsing?
    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    Or CNA' s sources are Bollywood movies?

  • @Intudesia8792
    @Intudesia8792 Před 23 dny +65

    Why did CNA ask a Japanese expert on China?, just like we were to ask a Malaysian expert on Singapore. The CNA's view on China is mostly misleading and not accurate since the source they get are coming mainly from the western countries.

    • @happymelon7129
      @happymelon7129 Před 23 dny +9

      they knew, but need to follow agenda😅

    • @Userkzb20253
      @Userkzb20253 Před 20 dny +1

      Nothing wrong with that if their analysis is factual, good and not biased.

    • @lanlantulan
      @lanlantulan Před 19 dny +1

      @hieveryone2003 you are a propaganda.. lol

    • @kennyng2289
      @kennyng2289 Před 17 dny

      ​czcams.com/video/VfJKC46L660/video.htmlsi=WN73eCaIZLubL_kV

  • @AlreadyHere-
    @AlreadyHere- Před 23 dny +35

    CNA getting more funding for CIA for this biased reporting ?

  • @YongLi-np3wg
    @YongLi-np3wg Před 24 dny +132

    controversial=not approved by the USA

    • @katong1953
      @katong1953 Před 23 dny +21

      CNA is talking US empire bullcrap. What's so controversial about China's industrial policy? Singapore has its own industrial policy. Even India has its "Make In India" industrial policy. CNA, behave yourself.

    • @katong1953
      @katong1953 Před 22 dny +10

      Actually, "Made In China 2025" wasn't controversial at all even to Americans -- until Trump became president. I still remember rreading and watching a video of Trump saying he was angered by "Made In China 2025". That was a fine example of Trump's narcissism, and I posted about it at that time.
      I could understand if Americans are concerned about it (although they shouldn't, at least not to the point of lashing out at China). But angered by it? Only a narcissist would be angered by it.
      .
      I have read a lot on the fascinating medical condition known as Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) because I have dealt with people suffering from NPD, and I wanted to understand the condition.
      When we hear "narcissism", an image of a person holding up and looking at a mirror comes to mind. But the medical condition of NPD is much more than that. Traits of NPD include constantly seeking validation (oh, your work is great, this is so well done, fantastic, you look so good, etc), overly ambitious (even on minor matters), lying, and getting offended by almost everything and anything. The last trait is like a person who perceives he has a physical defect or a former sports person who is now fat and unfit, and the person becomes very sensitive about his condition, and very easily takes offence over people laughing or whispering nearby, even though those people may not be talking about him at all.
      Trump suffers from NPD. Americans may fear "Made In China 2025", but anger is logically out of place. But not so for a person, especially a president, suffering from NPD.

    • @YongLi-np3wg
      @YongLi-np3wg Před 22 dny +4

      @@katong1953 Trump is just a symbol. The real problem is that American fears comoetition. This is sad.

    • @hokroeger
      @hokroeger Před 22 dny +3

      'Made In USA 2025': Examining the scorecard of Washington's controversial warmonger industrial policy

    • @saingowhow9822
      @saingowhow9822 Před 21 dnem +1

      台湾人!

  • @happymelon7129
    @happymelon7129 Před 24 dny +58

    Why not tell the truth ? what the West concern about?
    The West has set up Asia as a labor camp, and the labor camp must stay as labor camp, not allow to develop.
    But China escaped and developed.
    😝They feel angry/worried that other countries will follow.

    • @happymelon7129
      @happymelon7129 Před 24 dny +1

      We all knew It is written in U$ Foreign Policy document, to keep Asia poor and divided .

    • @happymelon7129
      @happymelon7129 Před 24 dny +14

      The US Foreign Policy to keep Asia poor and divided as stated in a top-secret U.S. Foreign Policy document written 76 years ago is still in force.
      February 24, 1948, Declassified U.S. Foreign Policy:
      Furthermore, we have about 50% of the world’s wealth but only 6.3% of its population. This disparity is particularly great as between ourselves and the peoples of Asia. In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. ... that Japan and the Philippines will be found to be the corner-stones of such a Pacific security system and that if we can contrive to retain effective control over these areas there can be no serious threat to our security from the East within our time.
      Taiwan was added to the Pacific security system after Chiang's army retreated to the island of Taiwan in 1949. South Korea was added after the Korean War in 1953. The attempt with Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia was abandoned in 1975.

    • @HawkishMerlion1965
      @HawkishMerlion1965 Před 23 dny +3

      a lesson for India, India should stay as big cheap labour if not USA and west will conquer India 😢

  • @GASIA-cw8iw
    @GASIA-cw8iw Před 23 dny +18

    They used a Japanese from Japan to tell you "facts" about China.
    Lee 阿斗 thinks Singaporeans are very easy to hoodwink.
    Ha ha ha!

  • @L-K-K
    @L-K-K Před 24 dny +24

    It's amazingly immoral that the West expect other nations with bigger population to stay impoverished & view attempts to achieve same level of prosperity as the West as an act of aggression - a desire to "overtake" "surpass" "dominate" etc. Seems like there's a 2-prong attack on others' right to a decent modern life: 1 cherry pick stats, eg measure aggregates in absolute figures rather than per person prosperity & purchasing power & use those aggregates to fabricate a narrative of foreign aggressions or unfair play. 2 instigate unrest to break up bigger foreign countries so they can never surpass the US collectively. Bonus of this is the US military industrial complex makes a killing & with US-led dominance they can raid any other country's resources as well as wholesale land theft like in Palestine.

  • @happymelon7129
    @happymelon7129 Před 24 dny +88

    😅This channel almost become microphone for the west.
    Singapore getting so low ?

    • @EasternKalogeros
      @EasternKalogeros Před 24 dny +20

      Almost??? It is a mini BBC..please don't drag Singapore into this.... Is the ppl in CNA.

    • @ekleong8
      @ekleong8 Před 23 dny +15

      @@EasternKalogerosThe people’s getting more more Ang Mo sai!

    • @EarthyLee
      @EarthyLee Před 23 dny

      Singaporeans are descendants of the Great Britain! Or so they thinks. Ask they young Singaporeans and they will tell you their bloodline are not from China but from the UK.

    • @kennyskwong
      @kennyskwong Před 23 dny +12

      Singapore wants to show allegiance to the US master.

    • @EasternKalogeros
      @EasternKalogeros Před 23 dny

      @kennyskwong nope... only those WOKE ppl working within CNA. They don't have Singapore at heart. Always trying to drag us into conflict.

  • @HeatherHaymeer
    @HeatherHaymeer Před 23 dny +22

    I wish CNA would have better understanding and more knowledgeable so called expert to “Made in China” 2025 strategy and it’s achievements. After all, CNA should differentiate itself from CNN and BBC etc.

  • @AlreadyHere-
    @AlreadyHere- Před 23 dny +17

    The expert can't pull 2 sentences coercively ,.

  • @davidlee9493
    @davidlee9493 Před 24 dny +76

    Must be doing well. That's why the U.S. and E.U. accuses it of overcapacity.

    • @johnsmith-cw3wo
      @johnsmith-cw3wo Před 18 dny

      China is producing too much... but also China is collapsing...
      Russia's army is very weak... but also it the biggest threat to the west.

  • @htahtoo8851
    @htahtoo8851 Před 24 dny +50

    Some American companies received govt subsidies as well.

  • @johntwohy8337
    @johntwohy8337 Před 24 dny +62

    The experts are so often wrong......about China.

    • @AhmetTekin101
      @AhmetTekin101 Před 23 dny +1

      They have been all correct about China 🇨🇳, but the Chinese regime can't learn new things.

    • @pounlak4768
      @pounlak4768 Před 23 dny

      Not always

    • @katong1953
      @katong1953 Před 22 dny

      CNA's "experts" are more often wrong than right about China.

    • @ShhhHhhhz
      @ShhhHhhhz Před 22 dny +2

      lookie here we got ourselves an expert on experts

    • @thecomment9489
      @thecomment9489 Před 22 dny

      Yes because the so-called experts are much of the time also act as part-time propagandists of the Western imperialist countires.

  • @haiyangfan7568
    @haiyangfan7568 Před 24 dny +74

    ??? Controversial??? To the US?😅😅😅😅😅😅😅??

  • @FemboyLegendGD
    @FemboyLegendGD Před 24 dny +23

    I support China

  • @cityofgardenerssg318
    @cityofgardenerssg318 Před 23 dny +13

    Well, the US/EU are all company-owned states. I prefer the system state-owned companies

  • @Sky-8646
    @Sky-8646 Před 24 dny +54

    America playing the wrong game.. check mate..

  • @horridohobbies
    @horridohobbies Před 24 dny +19

    Whether or not China achieves the vaguely-stated goals of "Made in China 2025," the important thing is that China will be *_largely_* self-sufficient. We are seeing this with China's remarkable comeback from US semiconductor sanctions. We are seeing this in China's overwhelming dominance in batteries, NEVs, and solar panels.

  • @jamesho8820
    @jamesho8820 Před 24 dny +34

    Actually this has been a phenomenal aspiration which has, for the most, been quite successful by any measure. This campaign has been focused on Chinese self reliance not on world domination irrespective of the Western narrative. It would appear that Western paranoia is driving the opposition.

  • @secretfountainofyouth9765
    @secretfountainofyouth9765 Před 24 dny +16

    Does it mean US and EU are privileged to be industrial leaders and rest of the world can't.

    • @thecomment9489
      @thecomment9489 Před 22 dny +3

      Yep that's pretty much the Western thinking.

  • @waynegore5291
    @waynegore5291 Před 24 dny +20

    KY Lee: " if we are not doing well, will other people still care about us?"

  • @theodore935
    @theodore935 Před 24 dny +39

    how is it controversial?

    • @happymelon7129
      @happymelon7129 Před 24 dny +7

      This channel almost become microphone for the west.
      Singapore getting so low ?

  • @AhmetTekin101
    @AhmetTekin101 Před 23 dny +14

    Not so long ago, China's 🇨🇳 economy was known on Wall Street as the Madoff economy.
    It only worked for so long.

  • @henry-pj9zo
    @henry-pj9zo Před 24 dny +16

    they have no idea about China at all.

  • @jrkr7357
    @jrkr7357 Před 24 dny +45

    China ..... China.....China ..... China....as if this planet has no other countries.......
    Please be informed this planet has about 195 countries......

    • @josdesouza
      @josdesouza Před 24 dny +2

      Argentina, anyone?

    • @tristanx3508
      @tristanx3508 Před 24 dny

      Why of course since China is the last hope of humankind to stop Weston continuing hegemonic domination of the global poor through colonialism, imperialism, genocide, slavery, globalization for dirt cheap labor, loot, steal, rob, bully, and sanction.

    • @Amy-we4ij
      @Amy-we4ij Před 24 dny

      Propaganda to make them sound big and threatening but not Covid or Jack Ma which were swept under the carpets.

    • @noneone3310
      @noneone3310 Před 23 dny

      they talk about china all day because that fundamentally they see china as the only country that could change their whole "rule based order", stop china, others by themselves won't have the ability and means to break free even if they want to, and no matter how much they want to, even russia. that's the core of their "strategy".
      it's about how they see the world.

    • @thecomment9489
      @thecomment9489 Před 22 dny

      @@josdesouza Argentina is a country of no significance. Or in other words it gained some significance when it's clown fascist president criticised China and Brazil.

  • @kongwee1978
    @kongwee1978 Před 23 dny +10

    CNA are so lack behind, now they are talking about new quality productivity.

  • @happymelon7129
    @happymelon7129 Před 24 dny +26

    😝West is very concern Asian overtake Ang Moe

    • @happymelon7129
      @happymelon7129 Před 23 dny +5

      @hieveryone2003 U r Ang Moe Gao ?

    • @happymelon7129
      @happymelon7129 Před 23 dny +4

      @hieveryone2003 Singapore use ”Ang Moe Gao “ .
      You better go "Holland" 😂 fly kite

  • @longcimb
    @longcimb Před 23 dny +8

    Agreed that China has never seek to dominate the global position like the US but allowing another player to break US dominance of which is clearly unhappy cos the bloodline is hegemonic

  • @markchiu1716
    @markchiu1716 Před 24 dny +18

    The host is so funny, I guess China can say it will be Number 2 in 2049 to comfort you

  • @cityofgardenerssg318
    @cityofgardenerssg318 Před 23 dny +6

    Both they US/EU/Japan have state subsidies for semiconductors and batteries, specifically to threaten China and they said so.

  • @jogo798
    @jogo798 Před 24 dny +22

    How is it controversial

  • @adolft_official
    @adolft_official Před 24 dny +14

    Many Inddian PoohJEETS are comparing MAKE IN ENDDIA with Made in CHINA 2025 while eating curry with hands

  • @yojimbo3681
    @yojimbo3681 Před 23 dny +12

    How many western "China Experts" actually live in China?

    • @AhmetTekin101
      @AhmetTekin101 Před 23 dny +4

      Actually you know more about China by living outside China.

    • @yojimbo3681
      @yojimbo3681 Před 23 dny

      @@AhmetTekin101 I lived both in and outside China, trust me, these experts have no clue, they're just collecting a paycheck.

    • @yojimbo3681
      @yojimbo3681 Před 23 dny +4

      @@AhmetTekin101 No, I've lived both in and outside of China. You develop assumptions about China when you live outside of it. You don't actually see the impact of the changes until you live in China.

    • @thecomment9489
      @thecomment9489 Před 22 dny

      @@AhmetTekin101 No you don't.

    • @johnsmith-cw3wo
      @johnsmith-cw3wo Před 18 dny +1

      @@yojimbo3681 ''China should spend less on industrial development and focus more social programs'' 😆
      I guess China could be more like USA, and spend less on industrial development and focus more on endless wars.

  • @L-K-K
    @L-K-K Před 24 dny +8

    Other govs also subsidise and enact protective measures. Eg the research that developed the internet was partly funded by the US gov, and everyone levies tariffs in import. The question is who will ultimately benefit from these subsidies & protective measures - the people or a select few "captain of industries" & other capitalist-shareholders. As long as Chinese gov ensures their investments benefit the people in China as well as humanity in general, then that's a good thing. Problem with the West is the hyper-capitalism & economic autocracy, where profit for the few trumps the lives of the rest. Socialsm & communism is merely economic democracy. How can anyone supporting democracy be against democracy in more spheres of life?

    • @L-K-K
      @L-K-K Před 24 dny +1

      South Korean tech giants also benefited from gov subsidies & undemocratic policies.

  • @avil8686
    @avil8686 Před 24 dny +17

    Controversial.... hehehehe

  • @liuantony638
    @liuantony638 Před 23 dny +3

    The made in china 2025 was actually a Chinese version of "German Industrie 4.0". " In German Industrie 4.0, smart factories use information and communications technologies to digitize their processes, leading to significant benefits such as improved quality, lower costs, and increased efficiency". When these concepts spred to China, Chinese industris were shocked by the advanced ideas. and China felt the emergency to catch up. Hence proposed Made in China 2025, to follow the steps of advanced German. hard to understand what is the probelm

  • @PutraMing
    @PutraMing Před 23 dny +7

    CIA propaganda channel 😂😂😂

  • @deschan2246
    @deschan2246 Před 23 dny +5

    Low end products manufacturing provided the most employment for 1.4 billions China Chinese. Number of jobs lost in low end products manufacturing cannot be replaced by China high end production which generally hire lesser staffs. Expect high unemployment rate in China to increase.

  • @gloucesterjet1
    @gloucesterjet1 Před 21 dnem +3

    Otelli Edwards line of questions are bias towards the Western narrative. This is clear from the clip. A big boo to CNA!

  • @user-rb9js9ox1j
    @user-rb9js9ox1j Před 19 dny +3

    The lady is always trying to mis lead the discussion to something negative for China

  • @ICEMAN_GT
    @ICEMAN_GT Před 23 dny +4

    Move to Mars if this is a concern.

  • @ivaoh9425
    @ivaoh9425 Před 24 dny +8

    Every country has the right to do whatever is the best for them, china could attempt the dominance ans usa has the right to not help them and restict its technology

  • @josdesouza
    @josdesouza Před 24 dny +5

    Already accomplished in 2024.

  • @apfchuancheong
    @apfchuancheong Před 23 dny +2

    Ultimately, is the government can afford the seed funding to grow the industry...

  • @gaobili
    @gaobili Před 24 dny +7

    dog whistle report

  • @tedchandran
    @tedchandran Před 24 dny +6

    Jai Hind. China now has Made in China 2025. However we Indians have a bigger Vision with our Made in India 2040.

    • @joekerr8037
      @joekerr8037 Před 23 dny +4

      More toilets in 2040 ?

    • @tanc.h8675
      @tanc.h8675 Před 23 dny +3

      Go make your chapatti

    • @wowokingxoxo
      @wowokingxoxo Před 23 dny +3

      India has lots of potential. But first some basics have to be sorted out like the exam cheating culture. You cant really hire the right people unless you make them pass a proper exam. They are 30 years behind .

    • @thecomment9489
      @thecomment9489 Před 22 dny +1

      @@joekerr8037 😂😂😂😂

  • @MarcoPolo-hn8or
    @MarcoPolo-hn8or Před 19 dny +2

    What is that guy talking about. USA subsidizes a lot of their companies 😂

  • @AutonomousSystem---19
    @AutonomousSystem---19 Před 22 dny +2

    Singapore's top priorities are still on National Development Desmond's plan on marine eco parks will attract many investors n gov should carefully select foreign banks n INDIAN companies ie HSBC , CIMB , Citi , Standchart etc if they are not hiring Singaporeans then it is time to ask them to relocate elsewhere to make way for many other bigger investors who are willing to hire n expand in SG. Once again CECA should be abolished immediately.🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 Big giants are hungry to building growth in SG.

  • @michaelyeo4808
    @michaelyeo4808 Před 22 dny +1

    If we look at China's progress in accordance with the West's model, everything in China seems unsustainable. Whether China development will have to go along with the model of the West? Not sure.

  • @johntwohy8337
    @johntwohy8337 Před 24 dny +2

    Let's wait a few more years and see.

  • @harrypothead4575
    @harrypothead4575 Před 21 dnem +1

    Controversial industrial policy?

  • @steventan2550
    @steventan2550 Před 17 dny

    If China has not made headways in telecommunication, solar panels, electric vehicles, etc the US would not have gone ballistic.

  • @lifefun1987
    @lifefun1987 Před 21 dnem +1

    byd EV now no. 1 car in sg market. 16% market share. more than toyota.

  • @lvjinbin28
    @lvjinbin28 Před 18 dny

    WHY MEDIA DOESN'T INTERVIEW CHINESE ABOUT CHINESE ISSUE??? DO YOU INTERVIEW CHINESE ABOUT AMERICAN ISSUE??

  • @philipwong895
    @philipwong895 Před 19 dny

    Following the September 11, 2001 attack, the U.S. shifted attention from China to the Middle East, easing China's entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in December 2001. As China emerged as the "world's factory," producing inexpensive goods that lowered global inflation, central banks, including the U.S. Federal Reserve, maintained low-interest rates, fostering excessive leveraging in the U.S. and Europe. This, coupled with risky financial practices and the housing market's collapse, led to the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. Despite feeling unsettled by China's economic growth, the United States actively pursued financial support from China, for China to continue purchasing U.S. Treasury bills.
    In 2011, Obama proposed the "Pivot to Asia" strategy, which shifted the focus of US foreign policy from the Middle East to Asia. This, along with the wargaming of a sea blockade of Chinese commercial ships on a global scale, the formation of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which deliberately excluded China, the establishment of a 2500-strong US marine air-ground task force in Darwin, and an increase in the rotation of both US Air Force planes and US Navy vessels through Australian bases, alarmed the Chinese leadership.
    Unable to remain passive, hide their strength, and bide their time, Xi Jinping was selected as the leader of China in 2013 to make China more secure. These included the establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, the Belt and Road initiative, and the building of artificial islands in the South China Sea. In 2015 the "Made in China 2025" initiative was announced. These policies directly responded to the perceived threat posed by the "Pivot to Asia" strategy. No country is excluded from joining the AIIB or the Belt and Road Initiative. Obama's intentions were clarified when he responded to Xi Jinping's proposal on September 25, 2015, to make the South China Sea (SCS) a non-militarized zone by initiating freedom of navigation operations in the SCS on October 27, 2015.
    It was more cost-effective for China to purchase reliable Western chips, benefiting both sides. China spends more on chip imports than on oil. The US sanctions forced China to develop its domestic supply chain. When self-sufficient, China can provide the world with more affordable chips.
    The US and its allies are developing their own supply chain, but it cannot be competitive without access to a large market. The US is sparing no effort in its Tonya Harding competition strategy. The Chinese are very grateful to the US for pushing them towards self-sufficiency. Thanks to the US, China now has its own GPS system and space program. The US chips sanction is converting its biggest chips customer to be its biggest competitor. More sanctions, please.

  • @AutonomousSystem---19
    @AutonomousSystem---19 Před 22 dny

    Curious why so many countries love to have very big celebrations in Singapore.

  • @chanoliverkumyun9123
    @chanoliverkumyun9123 Před 21 dnem

    State ownership has an advantage of suppressing the ultrarich from dominance of the economy like the Big Techs.
    Private ownership has the advantage of free market competitions and efficiency.
    To overcome shortfall, state companies in China set their competition against western big leaders. So its very frightening to the west.
    However China has to take note that if ever they managed to achieve peak global dominance, they will lose their motivation and decline too. Such is the sad case of worldly pursuits with disregard of eternity.😢

  • @birdeyecloud6801
    @birdeyecloud6801 Před 24 dny +1

    Chinese is so funny they are producing many robots but they don't have much younger generations. Poor or rich doesn't matter, the world is ruled by human not by robots.

  • @sportszone9159
    @sportszone9159 Před 21 dnem +2

    Propaganda channel😂😂😂

  • @devildevil2271
    @devildevil2271 Před 23 dny +2

    Made in India vs made in China, Singapore must import everything from India

  • @glumour3081
    @glumour3081 Před 24 dny +1

    Prof. E... e.... e... e... e....

  • @nextlastChang
    @nextlastChang Před 23 dny +8

    China is declining.
    India 🇮🇳 is projected to become a developed nation in 25 years.
    - At the same time, third-world China will become a second North Korea.

    • @rockqhshi
      @rockqhshi Před 23 dny

      IQ < 0

    • @tanc.h8675
      @tanc.h8675 Před 23 dny +5

      Are you related to Gordon Chang?

    • @peterhsieh380
      @peterhsieh380 Před 23 dny

      ​@@tanc.h8675Related to all the Indiots in the world.

    • @thecomment9489
      @thecomment9489 Před 22 dny

      'India 🇮🇳 is projected to become a developed nation in 25 years"
      ROFL

    • @jacku8304
      @jacku8304 Před 22 dny

      Maybe India's present insufficient toilet facilities will finally be achieved in 25 years.
      - In 10 years time, third-world India will become a second Bangladesh.

  • @deschan2246
    @deschan2246 Před 23 dny +2

    Good analysis by Japan Professor. 👍👍👍

  • @ArabicReja973
    @ArabicReja973 Před 23 dny +7

    Chinese 🇨🇳 property sector, which accounts for 30% of GDP, is crashing.
    - Exports and imports, accounting for 37% GDP, are down.
    - Foreign investment (FDI) is falling over 90%, lowest in 3 decades.
    - Foreign visitors are down 96% compared to the pre-pandemic level in 2019.
    - Consumer prices are experiencing deflation.
    - Youth unemployment hits over 21%, a record.
    - Its fast-shrinking workforce is 10 years older than neighboring countries.
    *Still, China keeps reporting outrageous GDP numbers.* Lol
    Where does the growth come from?

    • @gelinrefira
      @gelinrefira Před 23 dny +1

      LOL your figures are not even right, or deliberately misrepresented. This is the level of thinking in the west. It is little wonder why it is in decline.

    • @skydragon23101979
      @skydragon23101979 Před 23 dny +1

      Exports and Imports are down??? Where did you get your figures?? Domestic consumption is up, Investments is up. How is that not represented in GDP growth.

    • @gelinrefira
      @gelinrefira Před 22 dny +1

      @@skydragon23101979 because lying to themselves is how they can sleep at night.

    • @user-yw5wf6kz5t
      @user-yw5wf6kz5t Před 22 dny +2

      Kumar, build some toilets and decent drinking water in your country 1st

    • @lanlantulan
      @lanlantulan Před 19 dny +2

      ya what bot babble with rubbish again.

  • @user-xk2zy3ng1o
    @user-xk2zy3ng1o Před 23 dny +4

    Can't you find a guest who can speak English fluently?

  • @ankHank-fs1zr
    @ankHank-fs1zr Před 22 dny +4

    China leading US in technology race in all but a few fields, thinktank finds - The Guardian, 2 March, 2023
    China leads in 37 of 44 technologies tracked in a year-long project by thinktank the Australian Strategic Policy Institute.

  • @ankHank-fs1zr
    @ankHank-fs1zr Před 22 dny +6

    Please pardon the stance of CNA. They just don't want to get sanctioned in USA like TikTok!