SCOTUS Ruled on Presidential Immunity. What Does That Mean for Trump? | 538 Politics Podcast
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 07. 2024
- Since Thursday, the only story in American politics has been President Joe Biden's poor debate performance and what on earth Democrats are going to do about it. That was until the Supreme Court ruled that American presidents have legal immunity for official acts. In this installment of the 538 Politics podcast, Galen Druke speaks with Jessica Roth, a law professor and former federal prosecutor, about the details of the Supreme Court's ruling. Then 538's Nathaniel Rakich and Tia Yang discuss the continued fallout from the presidential debate.
Download the full audio podcast episode: itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/f...
Website: fivethirtyeight.com/
Merch: fivethirtyeight.com/store
Twitter: / fivethirtyeight
Facebook: / fivethirtyeight
Podcast: itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/f...
There have been different rules for the folks. Just ask the Native Americans and the Freedman People . Know your history
Bring back full video podcasts!
They said the presidential debate didn't make any difference what they done
Under this decision, Nixon could be thrown in jail.
“Total and complete immunity.”
Give me a break.
"...for acts that can be characterized within the core of their functions under the constitution"
Too many braincells required to type the full quote?
@@meijiishin5650 that can mean anything
@@Riley095 Oh, my bad I misread. I actually agree witb you lol.
@@meijiishin5650yea
It means he won. It means he won.
Trump 2024
Libs discuss every minor thing about trump in so much detail but millions of illegals entering seems to be ok
The fact that the "Libs" signed off on the bipartisan border bill and Trump ordered that bill killed for campaign purposes should tell you who actually cares about that issue.
Unless you're native American, you have at least one relative that was an immigrant
@@riaz8783 hmm, stop parroting that nonsense, this is not 1600’s or 1700’s anymore, Native American also came here through bering strait. Today’s world has borders and nation states, when you take an oath, you agree to protect your country’s border from illegal immigrants
As the US workforce ages, how do you think we should address the workforce needs in the US? Already, we are seeing more and more people retired, with fewer people of working age available to support the overall economy. The non-working age population in the US is growing 4 times as fast as the working age population. With relatively fewer people of working age, those fewer people will need to pay more and more taxes to support the roads, bridges, schools, and retired people. And inflation is inevitable as businesses chase not enough workers. How do we keep businesses in the US without enough workers? How do you suggest we do this if we don't have immigrants (and make them legal)?
Greece, facing a similar aging population, has instituted a 6 day workweek to make up for the labor shortage. Japan is using government funds to pay people to have more kids.
Are you for these policies (with uncertain results)? Or do you have some other policy to address the labor needs of an aging workforce?
Immigrants have always been a cornerstone of modern American. Skilled workers coming legally are welcome. So many Modern young folks can’t put their gameboy down long enough to be productive members of this world