'Blueprint on how to end the rule of law': Neal Katyal slams Supreme Court's ruling

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 30. 06. 2024
  • Former Acting U.S. Solicitor General Neal Katyal, former FBI General Counsel Andrew Weissmann, former U.S. attorney Chuck Rosenberg and NYU law professor Melissa Murray join Katy Tur to discuss the Supreme Court's ruling that presidents are only immune from criminal prosecution for official acts while in office.
    » Subscribe to MSNBC: / msnbc
    Download our new MSNBC app for the latest breaking news and daily headlines at a glance: www.msnbc.com/information/dow...
    Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
    MaddowBlog: www.msnbc.com/maddowblog
    ReidOut Blog: www.msnbc.com/reidoutblog
    MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.
    Connect with MSNBC Online
    Visit msnbc.com: www.msnbc.com/
    Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: link.msnbc.com/join/5ck/msnbc...
    Find MSNBC on Facebook: / msnbc
    Follow MSNBC on Twitter: / msnbc
    Follow MSNBC on Instagram: / msnbc
    #Trump #SupremeCourt #Immunity

Komentáře • 4,9K

  • @thomassawicki2065
    @thomassawicki2065 Před 2 dny +1236

    I served a year in Federal prison for 2 ounces of marijuana.
    The courts call this justice
    Now we have a King who can break the law with impunity.
    The courts call this justice
    How can a poor man stand such times and live ?

    • @JonathanJames-kk7fv
      @JonathanJames-kk7fv Před 2 dny +103

      GREAT example of the abuse of the courts and the law.

    • @tejanoj3017
      @tejanoj3017 Před 2 dny +109

      Privilege is invisible to those who have it.

    • @eriv
      @eriv Před 2 dny

      Go back to prison you didn’t learn enough yet

    • @AbeFroman-zx5hs
      @AbeFroman-zx5hs Před 2 dny

      @@JonathanJames-kk7fv life isn’t fair skippy. Problem with you lefties is you’d rather cry about it than do something about it.

    • @AbeFroman-zx5hs
      @AbeFroman-zx5hs Před 2 dny +5

      @@tejanoj3017 another cry baby.

  • @aralynnaralynn5548
    @aralynnaralynn5548 Před 2 dny +235

    Presidents should not be above the law!

    • @josephgriffin2388
      @josephgriffin2388 Před dnem

      AND THE GOVERNMENT SHOULDN'T BE WEAPONIZED AGAINST HALF THE VOTING POPULACE EITHER!!

    • @LahainaStrong444
      @LahainaStrong444 Před 11 hodinami

      that's what the SCOTUS said before they were bribed. now they are saying something else, and that something else is wicked.

    •  Před 6 hodinami +5

      Neither should SCOTUS'.

    • @RichTheEngineer
      @RichTheEngineer Před 5 hodinami

      Neither are above the law. If you people would just bother to read the Constitution, but no, babbling Marxist idiots can't read.

  • @AudraGibson
    @AudraGibson Před dnem +246

    I’m disgusted by this decision and what it means for our democracy.

    • @James-gq4tb
      @James-gq4tb Před dnem

      the justices on the Supreme Court quite literally just made stuff up to help their king. no where in the constitution does it support their ruling, and this was pointed out by the dissent

    • @toddyancy6249
      @toddyancy6249 Před dnem

      BIDEN SHOULD DECLAIRE A STATE OF EMERGENCY ACTIVATE THE MILATARY POLL ALL AMERICA VOTERS TO SEE WHAT THE ACTUAL COUNTRY WANTS . AND DO IT AS KING of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA

    • @wanderlusttv4382
      @wanderlusttv4382 Před dnem +3

      We are a constitutional republic. Check into it

    • @stevenmitchell1
      @stevenmitchell1 Před dnem +1

      @@wanderlusttv4382 like the Soviet Union was?

    • @stevenmitchell1
      @stevenmitchell1 Před dnem

      @@wanderlusttv4382 I guess that you've never read the US Constitution?

  • @SL-ig7db
    @SL-ig7db Před dnem +203

    Supremely Corrupt Court. What a disappointing/shocking/sad day.

    • @brycedery9596
      @brycedery9596 Před dnem

      *Supremely Corrupt Coup Court.

    • @James-gq4tb
      @James-gq4tb Před dnem

      the justices on the Supreme Court quite literally just made stuff up to help their king. no where in the constitution does it support their ruling, and this was pointed out by the dissent

    • @MR-sq8ez
      @MR-sq8ez Před dnem

      Not if the decision were favorable to the Democrats. They were super and praised by Biden til yesterday, right?

    • @user-cz5lj2vx1f
      @user-cz5lj2vx1f Před dnem

      The MAGA-GOP 6 justices made this ruling turning presidents into KINGS. The 3 LIBERAL justices DISSENTED. Read dissent by Justice SONYA SOTOMAYER--she defends democracy!

    • @toddyancy6249
      @toddyancy6249 Před dnem

      BIDEN SHOULD DECLAIRE A STATE OF EMERGENCY ACTIVATE THE MILATARY POLL ALL AMERICA VOTERS TO SEE WHAT THE ACTUAL COUNTRY WANTS . AND DO IT AS KING of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA

  • @nightrider9904
    @nightrider9904 Před 2 dny +728

    Take $100,000 bribe while doing an official act like signing some into law is not able to be prosecuted because it was done during an official act. Not only absurd but more dangerous than anything we have ever seen in government.

    • @joemama5181
      @joemama5181 Před 2 dny

      Like Joe Biden saying Ukraine wouldn't get the money unless the prosecutor investigating Hunter and Burisma got fired?

    • @jameswheeler-gr8wd
      @jameswheeler-gr8wd Před 2 dny

      Yeah but it seems there is complete total corruption now in our government but that doesn't matter anymore... Including the supreme Court

    • @RichTheEngineer
      @RichTheEngineer Před 2 dny +12

      Congress still has power to impeach and remove President for misdeeds.

    • @simonham7792
      @simonham7792 Před 2 dny +17

      Alms for the king

    • @ytyehyeh
      @ytyehyeh Před 2 dny

      ​​@@RichTheEngineera smart criminal president would do the criming while a lame duck and then resign before he could be impeached and convicted by Congress. Heck, that part doesn't even matter anymore since scotus went beyond what John Sauer argued for at the appellate court, i.e ex-potus is now potentially immune even if impeached and convicted.

  • @jim2376
    @jim2376 Před 2 dny +608

    What the Dred Scott decision was to the 19th century, this decision is to the 21st century. The Roberts Court is one of the worst courts in American history.

    • @pattykelly6621
      @pattykelly6621 Před 2 dny

      We don't need to tread lightly. The Roberts court is THE WORST COURT in American history.

    • @eternalskeptic
      @eternalskeptic Před 2 dny

      Just wait until they repeal the Emancipation Proclamation...

    • @carolbulmer8253
      @carolbulmer8253 Před 2 dny +24

      This SCOTUS decision is very sad😔

    • @BrooklynLilly
      @BrooklynLilly Před dnem +12

      🎯🤦🏼‍♀️

    • @simonham7792
      @simonham7792 Před dnem +21

      If the law applies to some and not others then why do what you are told.?

  • @emanuelmota7217
    @emanuelmota7217 Před dnem +48

    HOw is it possible to say the prosecution can't use actual evidence of a crimes as evidence in court??

    • @JohnWerner-te5zy
      @JohnWerner-te5zy Před dnem +9

      Because that would make life difficult for the King-in-Waiting, Donald I, in the view of the majority of the Supreme Court justices.

    • @RichTheEngineer
      @RichTheEngineer Před 5 hodinami

      If only there were actual presentable evidence. Instead all we have is lies and deceptions by those politically opposed to him.

  • @kv7654
    @kv7654 Před dnem +51

    I’m not even American. I’m Canadian and I’m so unbelievably upset about this that I’m beyond words. How can this be real !!??!

    • @alanalee9437
      @alanalee9437 Před 19 hodinami

      I’m an Australian and I’m stunned at the cunning of whoever is responsible for Trump. Watching it all play out over the past few years has actually knocked any sense of good prevailing out of me now. I simply can’t believe your people cannot see him for the despicable human he is. He is dangerous for the planet.

    • @DwynRoberts
      @DwynRoberts Před 10 hodinami +2

      I'm Canadian too and we need to be very vigilant withPP and the CONS

    • @anthon33
      @anthon33 Před 5 hodinami +1

      Our gov has been taken over ,get help !!

    • @RandyWinn42
      @RandyWinn42 Před 3 hodinami

      The fascist movement has been patiently creeping along since the Rehnquist Court installed George W Bush. A lot of their wealth depends on this.

    • @TheBorgrR
      @TheBorgrR Před 3 hodinami

      As is the rest of the world. These American judges are a threat to the world and democracy and should be held accountable before a international court for crimes against humanity.

  • @richardoracin2655
    @richardoracin2655 Před dnem +113

    I don't care if they have too wheelchair President Biden around. I'm voting Blue. Fix the Supreme Court and our country.

    • @SoniSada-lm8xz
      @SoniSada-lm8xz Před 7 hodinami +6

      yeah we have had a President in a wheelchair before....

    • @RichTheEngineer
      @RichTheEngineer Před 5 hodinami

      By "fix", I take it you mean to let Marxist Criminals enslave and impoverish us?

    • @AkweliParker
      @AkweliParker Před 4 hodinami

      I don’t care if Biden’s head is in a jar and he communicates haltingly through a spiritual medium. Literally ANYTHING is better than letting Trump back into the Oval Office. The only thing worse than Trump’s incompetence is his malevolence.

    • @bzb2932
      @bzb2932 Před 3 hodinami

      @@SoniSada-lm8xz FDR's legs didn't work. His brain worked just fine. There IS a difference.

    • @johnvaughn2590
      @johnvaughn2590 Před 3 hodinami

      Well, the problem isn't getting you and me to vote for Biden, we're not insane fascists. The problem is we are headed (again) to defeat. Swapping out our dear President for Harris or wishfully, Gov. Newsom, seems the only logical way forward, but we are Democrats so that's a problem.

  • @markdonnelly394
    @markdonnelly394 Před 2 dny +458

    I’m not sure we the American people understand exactly what this decision means to undermine our rule of law and democracy. I’m just in shock and sick to my stomach.

  • @dw8182
    @dw8182 Před dnem +21

    Biden should put his justice department to work.....save America again

  • @TheRasiani
    @TheRasiani Před dnem +25

    And remember - as of 48 hours ago, its OK to tip your SCOTUS justice. Its not a bribe after the fact - its a tip. Just the tip.

    • @dennisball4699
      @dennisball4699 Před 7 hodinami

      SCOTUS says it's ok for SCOTUS members to accept bribes. What could go wrong?

  • @JR-pr8jb
    @JR-pr8jb Před 2 dny +716

    Having been born in the last years of our fight against Hitler, I never dreamed I'd live out my final years under a fascist dictatorship.

  • @mitchellsmith4601
    @mitchellsmith4601 Před 2 dny +291

    We cannot survive as a country if we have to trust the president not to engage in crimes.

    • @besmartvoteblue2702
      @besmartvoteblue2702 Před dnem

      We have not had a criminal president before Trump.

    • @ardentynekent2099
      @ardentynekent2099 Před dnem +2

      "I was officially hitting the golf ball because I said so. I don't expect you to make a decision within the next year. JOE! We love and thank you. 💙

    • @emanuelmota7217
      @emanuelmota7217 Před dnem +7

      Especially a president like Trump.

    • @xU7fr1cx
      @xU7fr1cx Před dnem +2

      ask the clintons about the harddrives they were frying ;-)

    • @jgcalc
      @jgcalc Před dnem

      What did trump do? U ok with obama drone striking like a mad man? Bush starting wars? ​@@emanuelmota7217

  • @OB17358
    @OB17358 Před dnem +35

    These six justices are in step with the Federalist Society.

  • @Professa301
    @Professa301 Před dnem +32

    Imagine having “impeached supreme court justice” on your résumé

    • @BulDurham
      @BulDurham Před dnem

      Keep on weaponizing the institutions against your political opponents and you will surely see the end of democracy, and that won't end in your favor or in mine.

    • @jamesjones-wv9ik
      @jamesjones-wv9ik Před dnem +2

      Or "arrested for Obstruction of Justice"?

    • @RichTheEngineer
      @RichTheEngineer Před 5 hodinami

      Sounds better than anything you could possibly put on yours.

  • @A-Pa-s-Plainjane
    @A-Pa-s-Plainjane Před 2 dny +424

    Neal Katyal is right. The day America died.

    • @MediaSlayerONE
      @MediaSlayerONE Před 2 dny

      The day the Democrats got their feelings hurt...again.

    • @albertomacias7159
      @albertomacias7159 Před 2 dny +6

      You wish the day America became whole again. Trump 2024 !!

    • @TL-di3mw
      @TL-di3mw Před 2 dny

      ​@@albertomacias7159
      A fascist America.

    • @brendansparks1511
      @brendansparks1511 Před 2 dny +23

      @@albertomacias7159 Mussolini 1922. Stalin 1923. Hitler 1933. Franco 1938. Mao Zedong 1948. Pol Pot 1974. Putin 1999. Trump 2024. Keep up the good work albertomacias.

    • @gabrieln3613
      @gabrieln3613 Před 2 dny

      @@brendansparks1511 You placed Trump (including Stephen Miller) in the right group. Doubtful it will register with @albertomacias7159 though.

  • @karenkunz1152
    @karenkunz1152 Před dnem +131

    This is a kangaroo court now. It’s despicable

    • @adinahirschmann3112
      @adinahirschmann3112 Před dnem +5

      This is an insult to kangaroos.

    • @deborahpitcher7723
      @deborahpitcher7723 Před 20 hodinami

      Absolutely the Supreme Court is rogue. It is garbage and they need to be removed and if Biden has ultimate power, then he can remove them.

    • @deborahpitcher7723
      @deborahpitcher7723 Před 20 hodinami +1

      Unless you have ultimate power as a president to do whatever you want to do think about that

    • @deborahpitcher7723
      @deborahpitcher7723 Před 20 hodinami

      When the Supreme Court Justice tries to take our constitution away from the we the people, then they also are going against the president and if you have total immunity, you take care of the Supreme Court justices so they can’t destroy America

    • @michaelstancato6057
      @michaelstancato6057 Před 13 hodinami

      Biden will run a Top Gun ad to recruit the right stuff. Trump is a showman, and this defensive showmanship must be used to protect democracy.

  • @kradwonders
    @kradwonders Před dnem +24

    This court just stuck a knife in the heart of the upcoming Independence Day. We celebrate our independence on July 4th this court just told us that George Washington and the Continental Army wasted their time and that the country should be ruled by a King. A King with unlimited powers to control the lives of the citizens and imprison all those who disobey his rule. A King who can control the movement of the citizens without his permission such as going to another city for vacation. A King who will require all citizens to carry I.D. papers.

    • @JohnWerner-te5zy
      @JohnWerner-te5zy Před dnem

      Are you looking forward to the coronation of His Royal Highness King Donald I of Mar-A-Lago on the Capitol Steps by Chief Justice John Roberts as much as I am? Will be wild! Expect wall-to-wall coverage of the event on Trump Media and X. Nobody will have seen anything like it!

    • @joannerowan6320
      @joannerowan6320 Před dnem

      If frumpo gets elected again, God help us, I fully expect it will be just like Germany was under hitler. Troops patrolling the streets in every single neighborhood. You won't be able to go anywhere unless you have papers to show and tell them why you're going there. All the benefits we may all enjoy now will be gone. Healthcare, child care, housing, SSA, Medicare, Medicaid ... All gone so they can save money to give tax breaks to their RICH FRIENDS AND DISCOUNTS TO THEIR CAMPAIGN DONATORS. It's not a dream or a nightmare. It's reality and it's coming sooner than you think. Enjoy the upcoming July 4 INDEPENDENCE holiday. If frumpo gets back in the WH ... it's the LAST ONE YOU'LL CELEBRATE.

    • @pruecook5064
      @pruecook5064 Před 11 hodinami

      Surely Independence Day will be cancelled if the Fat King is on the throne next year.

  • @markwaldie3000
    @markwaldie3000 Před dnem +18

    Absolutely disgusting decision, can't believe it, goodbye Democracy in the US. From Australia, hopefully we can learn something from your mistakes. It comes down to the vote of the people, the way this is heading, Jamie Raskin was right, The Handmaid's Tale is getting very close.

    • @RichTheEngineer
      @RichTheEngineer Před 5 hodinami

      Australia is already a dictatorship, you fools just don't understand yet.

  • @blusurf9964
    @blusurf9964 Před 2 dny +360

    The week fascism took a strong hold in America. SCOTUS was our downfall. Too much power in too few hands. I feel so sad and disheartened at how broken we are.

    • @interstellar618
      @interstellar618 Před 2 dny

      The people in power now are the fascists, chief..not scotus.

    • @AnthonyMitchell-kc3ji
      @AnthonyMitchell-kc3ji Před 2 dny +16

      I Totally Agree With You 😢

    • @titusmaximus7278
      @titusmaximus7278 Před 2 dny

      No we aren't bound that tightly yet.

    • @albertomacias7159
      @albertomacias7159 Před 2 dny +2

      Trump all day baby !!

    • @e-spy
      @e-spy Před 2 dny

      @@albertomacias7159 so you admit he is a fascist. And you support that. Will that make you feel more at home?

  • @Sathias_
    @Sathias_ Před 2 dny +392

    What happens if a President determines that members of the supreme court are a threat to democracy?

    • @briley2177
      @briley2177 Před 2 dny

      That President (of any party) declares them enemies of the state, suspends their due process rights the way we do to terrorists, undertakes an official act through a military order (commander-in-chief core power) and does something heinously criminal with ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY so long as they control at least one house of Congress and can avoid impeachment.

    • @Krispy1011
      @Krispy1011 Před 2 dny

      maybe you are a threat to democracy, should something be done?

    • @MsBerries25
      @MsBerries25 Před 2 dny +34

      Great point.

    • @emjay2045
      @emjay2045 Před 2 dny +45

      Yup. Like all 6 of them

    • @bjornlangoren3002
      @bjornlangoren3002 Před 2 dny +75

      Well, he could sign a executive order to have them intermed at gitmo as agents for a foreign government. A very official act, and from this day subject to immunity.

  • @kathleenjeffrey8467
    @kathleenjeffrey8467 Před dnem +14

    This is on Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy and all those Republicans who stood by trump after Jan 6. If they would have stood by the comments they made after certifying the election we wouldn't be here in this mess today. Vote blue! Remember all who gave their lives fighting for our right to be a democratic society, thank God my dad isnt here to see the rights he fought for taken away from his granddaughters and great granddaughters!

    • @pruecook5064
      @pruecook5064 Před 11 hodinami

      This is the absolute shame of it !

  • @daizalsamad946
    @daizalsamad946 Před dnem +14

    This is truly awful, and mot only for the US.

  • @shawnmeloy9798
    @shawnmeloy9798 Před 2 dny +412

    Remember when Mitch McConnell refused to impeach trump because he said trump was still subject to prosecution?
    I mean, this is all Mitch McConnell, from that vote and speech to his personal effort to get fascist justices on the bench.

    • @joshuamoore3394
      @joshuamoore3394 Před 2 dny

      He also refused to confirm Obamas appointment of Garland, then confirms trumps under the exact same circumstances. The obama administration refused to fight for the seat. Then they put up Clinton, knowing she was a weak candidate. She predictably lost and now we’re here.

    • @ighdesigns
      @ighdesigns Před 2 dny

      McConnell is a *******. Fill in the blank.

    • @lavernewiley2198
      @lavernewiley2198 Před 2 dny

      Yep I said it then and I say it now Moscow Mitch is ruining the country when he refuses to put attorney General Garland forward for President Obama nomination for the Supreme Court and now it’s has come to pass

    • @sandrawilson9211
      @sandrawilson9211 Před 2 dny +44

      Let's not forget about Mitch McConnell who wouldn't hold a hearing when Obama nominated Merrick Garland for the supreme court. The fix was in then.

    • @scoobydoo3928
      @scoobydoo3928 Před 2 dny

      Yes. Drumpf is not intelligent enough to make this happen on his own.

  • @j.b.macadam6516
    @j.b.macadam6516 Před 2 dny +449

    History will record that on July 1, 2024, the United States ceased to be a Constitutional Republic when the Supreme Court decided that the office of the President was no longer subject to the Law! It is indeed, a sad day for our Nation!

    • @mattt5006
      @mattt5006 Před 2 dny +8

      Wrong Boris.

    • @walterhoenig6569
      @walterhoenig6569 Před 2 dny +15

      Yes, it is.

    • @eriv
      @eriv Před 2 dny

      Obama would have went to prison for his seat sale with blagovich if it weren’t for that same immunity

    • @j.b.macadam6516
      @j.b.macadam6516 Před 2 dny

      @@mattt5006 Up yours, numb nuts!

    • @interstellar618
      @interstellar618 Před 2 dny

      Yeah we cease to be a constitutional republic every time it's expedient for you hypocrites. Guess what? The law isnt your feelings.

  • @WriterRachel
    @WriterRachel Před dnem +15

    How can they not consider motive in determining if something is an official act? The test should be, who benefits from the questionable act, the country or the president?

    • @judithmcdonald9001
      @judithmcdonald9001 Před dnem

      Yes. Trump's expression when told about COVID said it all to me. He was calculating how he could get something out of it. That was the most criminal thing he ever did. We had a pandemic procedures book written by experts in the medical/social world that was used to thwart SARS and he threw that out and did not follow it. He'll never be prosecuted for that crime.

  • @patcomerford5596
    @patcomerford5596 Před dnem +12

    This is a deplorable day for American Democracy

  • @user-ch3se5yx9k
    @user-ch3se5yx9k Před dnem +100

    SHAME SHAME SHAME on the Supreme Court! Sickening, disgusting!

    • @moabman6803
      @moabman6803 Před dnem

      Bot

    • @toddyancy6249
      @toddyancy6249 Před dnem

      BIDEN SHOULD DECLAIRE A STATE OF EMERGENCY ACTIVATE THE MILATARY POLL ALL AMERICA VOTERS TO SEE WHAT THE ACTUAL COUNTRY WANTS . AND DO IT AS KING of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA

    • @wanderlusttv4382
      @wanderlusttv4382 Před dnem

      If you sick go to the doctor

    • @QueenAnitaSoul1
      @QueenAnitaSoul1 Před 13 hodinami

      ​@@wanderlusttv4382
      Knock It off

    • @theresasantiago1788
      @theresasantiago1788 Před 5 hodinami

      Who sang That ?🎉 0000h Shame Shame 🫠 Shame on U 🎉

  • @donnalynne6016
    @donnalynne6016 Před 2 dny +341

    Totally have lost respect for our Supreme Court . This ruling is outrageous.

    • @BrooklynLilly
      @BrooklynLilly Před dnem +4

      🎯🤦🏼‍♀️

    • @jimd4609
      @jimd4609 Před dnem +4

      Tell me, what law changed, they didnt, they jus clarified it

    • @redstarchrille
      @redstarchrille Před dnem

      @@jimd4609 Cant wait for Biden to order in the military on the supreme court, because why not, he have absolute immunity as a President.

    • @dervideominister
      @dervideominister Před dnem

      @@jimd4609 you are right - there is no ruling in the constitution about the immunity - like in other democratic countries.
      And guess what - most democratic leaders have no more immunity than any member of congress. The German constitution i.e. explicitly states that parliamentary immunity is not meant to protect members of parliament from prosecution, but only to ensure the functioning of the parliament.
      So - the SCOTUS filled in this empty space with an absolute immunity for the president!
      Think about it! Even if Trump doesn't take advantage of this - the next president will!!

    • @FazzaFazza-g7n
      @FazzaFazza-g7n Před dnem +2

      Hello greetings from the royal house of Dubai it's me prince hamdan

  • @paulschweizer7696
    @paulschweizer7696 Před dnem +10

    Could one argue that it would be an "official order", to protect the Constitutional and legal integrity of the Supreme Court, for the President to have certain judges arrested and prosecuted for bribery? Just asking....

    • @sgm7013
      @sgm7013 Před 3 hodinami

      Yes. That's why Russia is like it is now. None of their justices speak up for fear of Putin. We need our President, now also King, to speak up and get Congress to impeach these justices that have proven their contempt of the Constitution. They took an oath to the Constitution that they have now shredded. They themselves are the threat to the Constitution. President Putin wanted that power no matter what, democracy be damned. We have to have a President who still believes in our Constitution, not the power of the position. I don't know where this country is headed, but right now it doesn't look good. 💙 We the People need a protector like we've never needed one before.

  • @davidriggle7825
    @davidriggle7825 Před dnem +8

    Illegal acts ≠ Official acts
    The supreme court ruling is non sequitur. The constitution does not direct the president to commit illegal acts.
    Tanya Chutkan, should proceed with the case just as before.

    • @JohnWerner-te5zy
      @JohnWerner-te5zy Před dnem

      The supreme court conservative justices are doing some pruning with their political secateurs to ensure the State protection of the future King of All the Americas - and Mexico will pay for the coronation.

  • @RPerez-cf9pl
    @RPerez-cf9pl Před 2 dny +250

    Totally true. As long as it's an "official" act, Trump can do what he wants. This is truly horrible. One of many bad decisions from the Supreme Court lately.

    • @tuanseattle
      @tuanseattle Před dnem +9

      Unbelievable

    • @emilyfeagin2673
      @emilyfeagin2673 Před dnem

      They are being well paid to sell out the country

    • @ednaaldridge4416
      @ednaaldridge4416 Před dnem +11

      And no matter what he does, it will be considered "official. "

    • @redstarchrille
      @redstarchrille Před dnem

      @@ednaaldridge4416 Cant wait for Biden to order in the military on the supreme court, because why not, he have absolute immunity as a President.

    • @bobfoltyn322
      @bobfoltyn322 Před dnem

      Judge canon might be in trouble

  • @min2oly
    @min2oly Před 2 dny +163

    Trumps wife & kids can't stand to be in the same room with trump, do not let him back in the White House.

  • @ameliawoodard3015
    @ameliawoodard3015 Před dnem +8

    Mr. Neal K. Thank you for speaking up. Only in America can this happen. What an UNFAIR ruling. So, people vote BLUE 💙💙💙💙

  • @galeroyster1522
    @galeroyster1522 Před dnem +12

    If the sitting President can appoint a Justice, he should be able to fire a Justice with cause.

  • @ChristineJSmith16
    @ChristineJSmith16 Před 2 dny +173

    Somebody make that thing go away. We need America back.

    • @eugenemason1808
      @eugenemason1808 Před dnem +6

      Vote! And make we expand the court

    • @andreacassidy4100
      @andreacassidy4100 Před dnem +9

      This is only the beginning.... Vote BLUE

    • @dodgygoose3054
      @dodgygoose3054 Před dnem +5

      This is why you have to vote ... why you have to get your friends & family to vote, your literally need to fight for your America.

    • @uniquelylily1166
      @uniquelylily1166 Před dnem +5

      President Biden, "have Seal Team Six get rid of that thing running against you". From We the People😁💙🇺🇸

    • @HeSheTheyThem
      @HeSheTheyThem Před dnem

      Right...MAGA

  • @mnn1265
    @mnn1265 Před 2 dny +285

    I think the rule of law ended with Citizen's United and this SCOTUS. Let's just hope we can get it back someday...

    • @ld3511
      @ld3511 Před 2 dny

      It ended before that when the heritage terrorist organization bought the right wing scouts justices. No to tRump, NO to "christain" nationalist, No to fascism, NO to project 2025.

    • @RandomJane104
      @RandomJane104 Před dnem +20

      It all started there and has been downhill since. This is the nail in the coffin.
      If we don't vote for Biden and take the House and keep the Senate. There is no way to fix it.

    • @iandresari726
      @iandresari726 Před dnem +2

      says the russian trollbot LOL

    • @mnn1265
      @mnn1265 Před dnem +14

      @@iandresari726 I'm a veteran that fought for this country and for freedom... so you're absolutely wrong comrade.

    • @JoTracy
      @JoTracy Před dnem +7

      VOTE BLUE! all the way through

  • @relaxlibrary4249
    @relaxlibrary4249 Před 21 hodinou +6

    This whole "I don't think that would happen" mindset is what got us here. It's time to wake up!

  • @mikeb5664
    @mikeb5664 Před dnem +5

    Justice Thomas has received $4 million, while serving on the court. How is that even possible?

  • @LeftCoastStephen
    @LeftCoastStephen Před 2 dny +209

    Justice delayed is justice denied.

    • @mattt5006
      @mattt5006 Před 2 dny +2

      You commies are desperate.

    • @interstellar618
      @interstellar618 Před 2 dny +2

      Justice doesn't include your feelings.

    • @mile_high_topher
      @mile_high_topher Před 2 dny +12

      @@mattt5006 You couldn't define communism even if your life depended on it.

    • @nonya.bizness
      @nonya.bizness Před 2 dny +10

      except this decision IS justice denied. pretty much justice ended, actually.

    • @blackrocks8413
      @blackrocks8413 Před 2 dny +1

      like with hunter?

  • @reezagibbons465
    @reezagibbons465 Před 2 dny +256

    This is what happened in Germany in 1932

    • @ld3511
      @ld3511 Před 2 dny

      💯 and sadly it seems too many ignorant Americans are okay with this.

    • @sadiegirl
      @sadiegirl Před 2 dny +32

      True. Bought and paid for Supreme Court. Shame on them.

    • @BrooklynLilly
      @BrooklynLilly Před dnem +6

      @@sadiegirl🎯🤦🏼‍♀️

    • @user-kv2tj4du8p
      @user-kv2tj4du8p Před dnem +33

      yes. we are here now. so many don't want to believe it, and are doing every thing they can to not believe it, but the evil is here. it is at the door knocking. we are in real trouble right now.

    • @cathyrobinson6284
      @cathyrobinson6284 Před dnem +25

      @@sadiegirlAlito’s wife seems to love Germany. I’m not surprised they’re repeating history.

  • @videohistorysnippets8963

    We in Australia the people of this land wouldn’t put up with this nonsense.

  • @TCOLE-tc7vs
    @TCOLE-tc7vs Před dnem +9

    Neal always so brilliant and thorough! 100%

  • @shermantincher3417
    @shermantincher3417 Před 2 dny +185

    Who would have ever thought that letting supreme court justices caught accepting BRIBES from billionaires get away with it. While everyone who should be holding them accountable said oh my they failed to report gifts would end badly? How does a lifetime appointment make you immune from bribery charges?

    • @mglez2517
      @mglez2517 Před 2 dny

      The Supreme Court is eroding our democracy with its corruption. If these judges are not stopped, it will end American democracy.

    • @Kate-nr3fx3fi9o
      @Kate-nr3fx3fi9o Před 2 dny

      Biden and his drug-addict kid have taken $millions in bribes from Ukraine and China

    • @wyskass861
      @wyskass861 Před 2 dny

      Well, Congress can impeach justices. So technically "oversight", but when both parties act together, and Senate is incapable of any impeachment, the system is broken and there is literally no accountability for Scotus. They "self police"

    • @BrianS-ny9yd
      @BrianS-ny9yd Před 2 dny

      The only way to save America is for Dems to win everything and expand the court.

    • @iafarm2304
      @iafarm2304 Před 2 dny +8

      Or Impeachment and Removal from Office

  • @bgregg55
    @bgregg55 Před 2 dny +156

    The oligarchs that really run this country just got the last piece of the puzzle.

    • @StanHasselback
      @StanHasselback Před 2 dny +14

      No, but they did get a big piece of it. We will see if Americans' understand what just happened and if they care.

    • @lesliecurran1704
      @lesliecurran1704 Před 2 dny

      Keep in mind they're all building bunkers. I think this is completely orchestrated the deregulation of things that keep people safe the dismantling of the pandemic task force, The control of reproductive Rights. The criminalization of poor people and the building of camps for immigrants which is all part of project 2025. The expansion of the powers of the president and his immunity. It's all there. This is the groundwork for it. I think we're all just a bunch of leaves going over a cliff and most of them are supporting it. It includes the dismantling of the FCC that means control of the media . That too is part of the plan.

    • @craigthibault8568
      @craigthibault8568 Před 2 dny +4

      The next president after Trump will be Don Jr.

    • @oceanblue2024
      @oceanblue2024 Před 2 dny

      Welcome to China, Russia and N. Korea rule of laws.

    • @ld3511
      @ld3511 Před 2 dny

      @@craigthibault8568 OMG the horror. He's a total nepo baby with zero intelligence!

  • @marilynrowland5197
    @marilynrowland5197 Před dnem +7

    How did we get here? HOW? Let's look at CITIZENS UNITED! This was the pathway!

  • @donaldacoey1436
    @donaldacoey1436 Před dnem +6

    This is why the people of the land must be educated because obviously they're all a bunch of nuts on the Supreme Court

  • @cfrazier2013
    @cfrazier2013 Před 2 dny +179

    This was a ridiculous decision by the Supreme Court. Now what? Term limits is needed and vote!

    • @Eddie-ud4bb
      @Eddie-ud4bb Před dnem +5

      They's disgusting...well. 6 of the 9 are.

    • @aquatoneman
      @aquatoneman Před dnem +5

      There once existed in our fair land, a quote so dear to all; it kept us safe knowing that NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW! End of story, simple, full stop. So easy to understand. And yet...

    • @iandresari726
      @iandresari726 Před dnem

      comments like this are the reason why everyone thinks democrats are stupid....

    • @barrymoore4470
      @barrymoore4470 Před dnem +4

      The Biden administration should play hardball and stack the Court.

    • @trisha4797
      @trisha4797 Před dnem

      To late.

  • @uduodjenima8903
    @uduodjenima8903 Před 2 dny +111

    This is just dumb on the part of SCOTUS. Official acts are meant to be conducted legally, not criminally. So, what is the meaning of IMMUNITY from CRIMINAL OFFICIAL CONDUCT!! This is a convulated ruling. LUDICROUS!!

    • @JonathanSterlingUSA
      @JonathanSterlingUSA Před dnem

      And what sort of conduct can one man do that would be so incredibly harmful?

    • @santyclause8034
      @santyclause8034 Před dnem

      Are you alive? G'dang gpt-4 bot.

    • @JonathanSterlingUSA
      @JonathanSterlingUSA Před dnem

      @@santyclause8034
      Are you talking to me?

    • @user-lb3gw4qf5g
      @user-lb3gw4qf5g Před dnem

      If Joe Biden is healthy enough to run for president then he should have to stand trial for the felonies he has committed just like Donald Trump…

    • @artgreen6915
      @artgreen6915 Před dnem +4

      ​​@@JonathanSterlingUSA read the conclusion to Sotomayor's dissent.
      Edit: it's well reported, you shouldn't have to look far.

  • @huubvelthuis8988
    @huubvelthuis8988 Před dnem +8

    Why would a president need to break the law to carry out their official acts?

    • @BunnyLang
      @BunnyLang Před dnem +2

      Exactly, they wouldn't, but now they can.

    • @dmann1115
      @dmann1115 Před 12 hodinami

      They wouldn't and they shouldn't, and they've always managed without immunity, even those who did break the law (see Bush II, Obama, et al).

  • @gloriasharkey1118
    @gloriasharkey1118 Před dnem +6

    supreme court term limits! the president could make this ruling??!!

  • @walterhoenig6569
    @walterhoenig6569 Před 2 dny +222

    So Watergate could have been construed as an official act.

    • @Axolotl_Mischief
      @Axolotl_Mischief Před 2 dny +1

      Exactly. Now American Presidents are on the level of dictators with absolute power.
      The Right is really leaning hard into that 1930s Germany fantasy...

    • @oldbeatpete
      @oldbeatpete Před 2 dny +4

      BUT! Nixon & T.'s behavior is so political and not pertaining to their job as President, any jury would convict!

    • @Paul-mg8fz
      @Paul-mg8fz Před 2 dny +2

      It was a nothing case.

    • @monochromaticspider
      @monochromaticspider Před 2 dny +26

      @@oldbeatpete Doesn't matter of a jury would convict, the proseuction couldn't charge Nixon with anything.

    • @walterhoenig6569
      @walterhoenig6569 Před 2 dny

      @@oldbeatpeteit would never make it to a jury. And if it did,, the jury would hear none of the real evidence.

  • @kh23797
    @kh23797 Před dnem +68

    Those who value our democracy must unite now in protest, to demand that this be reversed. It will take a massive show of righteous disgust at this utter lunacy to restore America's core values.

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef Před dnem

      I'm calling for a Million Man March. AT SCOTUS.

    • @toddyancy6249
      @toddyancy6249 Před dnem

      BIDEN SHOULD DECLAIRE A STATE OF EMERGENCY ACTIVATE THE MILATARY POLL ALL AMERICA VOTERS TO SEE WHAT THE ACTUAL COUNTRY WANTS . AND DO IT AS KING of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA

    • @katfrog98
      @katfrog98 Před 20 hodinami +3

      Yell all you want, your demands are empty cries in the face of a predator.

  • @johnr9896
    @johnr9896 Před dnem +6

    In an official act disband and close the extreme court .

    • @JohnWerner-te5zy
      @JohnWerner-te5zy Před dnem

      This scenario is now made possible by the unwitting conservative majority on the Supreme Court provided the President is acting in his official capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the Department of Justice and doesn't take no for answer.

  • @Stud_muffin
    @Stud_muffin Před dnem +9

    So there were no term limits for presidents in 1776, Washington and later FDR held 4 terms. What is keeping this court from voiding term limits for Trump?

    • @kimberlyevans9160
      @kimberlyevans9160 Před dnem +3

      What's keeping Biden from doing it today?

    • @commscan314
      @commscan314 Před 10 hodinami

      The twenty-second amendment is much too explicit to permit that.

    • @Stud_muffin
      @Stud_muffin Před 5 hodinami

      You missed my point. SCOTUS wants to only use wording and laws from the Constitution era, you know, when slavery existed and women had zero rights. Amendments, are post-Constitution. Now there is one caveat; Amendments are ratified by legislatures in 38 states which are elected officials, so they may stand. On the other hand, could SCOTUS rule that it needs to be unanimous?

  • @jacklavinder8459
    @jacklavinder8459 Před 2 dny +273

    current president needs to push the limits of this decision to win

    • @MarkSmithhhh
      @MarkSmithhhh Před 2 dny +4

      O the hypocrisy

    • @joemama5181
      @joemama5181 Před 2 dny

      The current president has Alzheimer's.

    • @Trump2PrisonOn34Counts
      @Trump2PrisonOn34Counts Před 2 dny

      @@MarkSmithhhh And who made it possible for Biden to send Seal Team 6 after every Trump supporter?

    • @jameswheeler-gr8wd
      @jameswheeler-gr8wd Před 2 dny +47

      ​@@MarkSmithhhhoh yeah the hypocrisy.... Funny how we've had numerous presidents and not until Trump has immunity even come up..... That should tell you something Wise Guy....

    • @HeatherRider
      @HeatherRider Před 2 dny

      ​@@jameswheeler-gr8wd This right here is no cap 🧢👆

  • @FriedChairs
    @FriedChairs Před dnem +100

    So unlike all of the rest of us, motive doesn’t factor into what they do? That is extremely dangerous.

    • @JohnWerner-te5zy
      @JohnWerner-te5zy Před dnem

      Motive does factor into it. The motive for this decision by the supreme court majority has been long in the baking by the conservative elements in American society and their billionaire sponsors. These recent decisions of the Supreme Court come from seeds long-planted with the aim of subverting justice in the nation as a prelude to the ascension of King Donald I to the throne in Washington. I wonder if Trump supporters had any idea that this was the long-term goal when casting their ballots. Probably not. Ignorance is bliss.

    • @James-gq4tb
      @James-gq4tb Před dnem

      the justices on the Supreme Court quite literally just made stuff up to help their king. no where in the constitution does it support their ruling, and this was pointed out by the dissent

    • @bobcox6518
      @bobcox6518 Před dnem

      We are not even allowed to ask about motive! DANGEROUS!

  • @edwardj.7007
    @edwardj.7007 Před dnem +6

    The Supreme Court is supposed to follow 3 main paths to reach a ruling. 1). The Constitution. 2). Congressional legislation and/or precedent. 3). The intent of the Founders based on the writings and the clues they left behind. (In that order).
    In other words...if there is nothing to apply from the Constitution...they move to option 2 - Congress and any relevant legislation. They can also look at precedent. When none of these things apply because they don't exist, then they are supposed to base rulings on the intent of the Founders, based on evidence from the time period.
    That being said....there is nothing in the Constitution granting the President these sweeping powers of immunity. It doesn't exist. There is also no legislation giving this kind of sweeping power to the President. There is no historical precedent for this. This egregious ruling means that Richard Nixon's crimes would have been just fine. He would have been immune.
    The 6 member majority on the court are not legitimate justices. They are 6 corrupt politicians in robes...nothing more. They need to be referred to as such from this point forward until they are gone.
    What these 6 politicians did was create constitutional law and an interpretation of law out of thin air. They did it with no legal basis. They literally just made it up to satisfy their own personal ideological and political biases and to help their political ally. An absolutely disgraceful move.
    What they were supposed to do in the absence of text addressing this issue in the Constitution, and in the absence of Congressional legislation....was make a finding based on the intent of the Founders. While the Founders didn't really address immunity in the Constitution, they very clearly made it known that a President must follow laws and is subject to the law. They clearly stated that a President is answerable to high crimes and misdemeanors. If The Founding Father's thought a President has the sweeping immunity that these 6 Supreme politicians came up with out of thin air, then they would not have put that clause in the Constitution.
    Secondly, we know that the Founders were very leery of giving an executive too much power. In fact, we know that The Founders themselves were vehemently opposed to this, because they were dealing with an oppressive and intrusive King of England who tried to impose his will on the Colonies. Does anyone really believe that the Founders would have wanted to create a King? This is obvious. So if these 6 Supreme corrupt politicians would have followed normal protocols for reaching a ruling, they would have had to look at the intent of the authors of the Constitution and would have had to come to the conclusion that a President shouldn't have this kind of sweeping immunity. They could have only come up with a narrow scope (that wouldn't apply to Trump) that a President is immune from prosecution for orders or mistakes during a time of grave national emergency, like a war on American soil. Something of that sort that would very narrow in scope could be seen as legitimate. But not the lunacy that we saw today on July 1st, 2024.

    • @71suns
      @71suns Před 18 hodinami +1

      Thank you for sharing this.

  • @janebishop5885
    @janebishop5885 Před dnem +8

    Leonard Leo and the Republican corporate machine that created him are partying non stop tonight.

  • @velmaallen4822
    @velmaallen4822 Před 2 dny +60

    I agree, this is not Democracy.

  • @marciahenry3893
    @marciahenry3893 Před 2 dny +122

    Thank you, Neal Katyal. You are brave enough to speak out on this decision.

  • @deviritter5232
    @deviritter5232 Před dnem +6

    So sad.
    These traders need to be removed from the court. Is Senator Durbin is your senator, please call him and tell him to get on it and start proceedings against these guys and get them removed. Get them impeached. Get them out of there and replaced with people who respect our democracy.

  • @alleycatpat
    @alleycatpat Před dnem +5

    So much for no one is above the law 😢

  • @KipArmadillo
    @KipArmadillo Před dnem +63

    Would it be an official act to immediately remove Thomas and Alito from the Court under suspicion of treason?

    • @toddyancy6249
      @toddyancy6249 Před dnem

      BIDEN SHOULD DECLAIRE A STATE OF EMERGENCY ACTIVATE THE MILATARY POLL ALL AMERICA VOTERS TO SEE WHAT THE ACTUAL COUNTRY WANTS . AND DO IT AS KING of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA

    • @user-zb7uh2ob1r
      @user-zb7uh2ob1r Před 20 hodinami +16

      Good idea. Apparently the president can get rid of a threat to democracy with immunity. Several of those SCOTUS judges are a threat to democracy, for sure. Also a fair number of people sitting in Congress. Go for it, Joe!

    • @alancoe1002
      @alancoe1002 Před 16 hodinami

      Quite, as Joe is still President. Dumbasses showed their treasonous hand too soon.

    • @patriciajones9987
      @patriciajones9987 Před 15 hodinami

      If only it was possible the court would not be as corrupt as it has become. There is nothing Supreme about those two money grubbing, arrogant, lawless, hateful men who should never have been allowed to sit on the Supreme Court.

    • @alancoe1002
      @alancoe1002 Před 15 hodinami +12

      Short. Legal. Answer. Yes. And they did it to themselves. Let's get busy.

  • @paularchibald7734
    @paularchibald7734 Před 2 dny +70

    Maybe we should ask our current president to perform some official acts. I could come up with several suggestions without trying!

  • @BeardyBaldyBob
    @BeardyBaldyBob Před dnem +4

    Will no one rid me of these meddlesome 'justices"?!

  • @jannmutube
    @jannmutube Před dnem +14

    ----- < According to 3 U.S.C. 301 (1) & (2) Article II duties/ official acts are defined by law. To my knowledge, there are not statutory provisions for the privileges the SCOTUS is legislating.
    ..... "A Law repugnant to the Constitution is void.” Marbury v Madison (1803). Marbury's statement should apply to SCOTUS rulings as well.

    • @71suns
      @71suns Před 18 hodinami +1

      Thank you. But WHO is going to hold them to account?

    • @jannmutube
      @jannmutube Před 18 hodinami

      @@71suns ---- < Voters will have to make sure Trump is NOT re-elected. Then, there's the possibility that the trials will still go forward.

  • @domainadmin6352
    @domainadmin6352 Před 2 dny +40

    This is not just the end of the rule of law - it is the end of separation of powers. Unfortunately, not enough Americans understand WHY the "rule of law" and the "separation of powers" are ESSENTIAL to their personal freedom.

    • @user-ry3tz4bw5h
      @user-ry3tz4bw5h Před dnem

      @@domainadmin6352 yes I agree so the media should get law scholars on their channels to EXPLAIN It to the people ..problem is are they bothered to listen

    • @dday9433
      @dday9433 Před dnem

      It's actually both. But yes.

    • @domainadmin6352
      @domainadmin6352 Před dnem +1

      @@user-ry3tz4bw5h It doesn't require a scholar - it does require someone who can communicate in clear everyday language. The "rule of law" in the United States legal system relies above all, on due process to protect individual' rights and freedoms. No precedent, no rules of legal analysis, no common sense on the Supreme Court, then no due process and bye-bye individual rights.

  • @honestbusiness1371
    @honestbusiness1371 Před 2 dny +148

    Green light Joe. Save the country’s democracy and send seal team six.

  • @wudangmtn
    @wudangmtn Před dnem +3

    Huge respect and admiration for Neal; however, I would like to hear his opinion on why he does not advocate expanding the court.

  • @dbeckerdbecker8812
    @dbeckerdbecker8812 Před dnem +5

    Biden throw trump in jail they gave you the power!!!!!

  • @beachbum6781
    @beachbum6781 Před 2 dny +58

    Adding Justices is the ONLY Solution and Joe MUST do it!!

    • @TheMangoMussolini
      @TheMangoMussolini Před 18 hodinami

      Can't be done. Needs a majority vote in the House to approve a law changing the number of justices. Should have done this in 2022 while we still had the clout.

    • @ceceliabockenstedt786
      @ceceliabockenstedt786 Před 13 hodinami

      The only solution is to elect Democrats as president and turn Congress decidedly blue--blue enough to change the ridiculous filibuster rule, blue enough to begin impeachment proceedings against certain SC justices, blue enough to overturn Dobbs, blue enough to allow the changes that have happen under Biden's to be securely attributed to him, blue enough to ensure that the litigation continues regarding this traitor and all of his acolytes.

    • @steviewonderland2630
      @steviewonderland2630 Před 7 hodinami

      ​@@TheMangoMussolini Choose your battles wisely. First win reelection. Then win majorities in both houses. Then proceed with the expansion of the court. Prioritize actions.

    • @RichTheEngineer
      @RichTheEngineer Před 5 hodinami

      It's hilarious how you keep calling DJT a potential dictator and yet you want Biden to be a dictator.

    • @TheMangoMussolini
      @TheMangoMussolini Před 4 hodinami

      @@steviewonderland2630 Sage words, I suppose. However, it's kinda Captain Obvious. It goes without saying that the Dems must control both houses, otherwise a bill expanding the court can't get through.

  • @nicolehowe1742
    @nicolehowe1742 Před 2 dny +87

    They could have said this months ago.🤬🤬🤬

    • @suehowie152
      @suehowie152 Před 2 dny +5

      Six months to make a half of a decision 🤦‍♀️

    • @wyskass861
      @wyskass861 Před 2 dny +12

      They wanted to delay DC trial. Duh

    • @Doodelz02
      @Doodelz02 Před dnem +4

      Waited 'til last possible day -- to allow them to get out of Dodge!

    • @wyskass861
      @wyskass861 Před dnem +4

      @@Doodelz02 And of course delay any and all Rump trials as a bonus

  • @reason3581
    @reason3581 Před 11 hodinami +3

    Expansion of the court and term limits. ASAP.

  • @user-mt1xc1em4s
    @user-mt1xc1em4s Před 12 hodinami +3

    We the American People need to push back !! No no no one is above the law , not even the president, impeach the supreme justices NOW !!😮😮

  • @meganwatson4479
    @meganwatson4479 Před 2 dny +74

    I think I'm gonna puke...this sickens me

  • @paulgoudfrooij6561
    @paulgoudfrooij6561 Před 2 dny +103

    Well, perhaps Biden should now perform some "official acts".

    • @emilyfeagin2673
      @emilyfeagin2673 Před dnem +6

      I would vote for him no matter what he does.
      He will let his conscience be his guide

    • @scottsammons7747
      @scottsammons7747 Před dnem +2

      Harsh Interrogation in Cuba for some Justices? It is important for the Administration to have a full understanding about the thought process of recent decisions. The process shouldn't take more than several months.

    • @JonathanJames-kk7fv
      @JonathanJames-kk7fv Před dnem +7

      Like jail the Supreme Court to protect our democracy?

    • @tstaff5524
      @tstaff5524 Před dnem

      Well if you follow this kangaroo court's logic, Biden could declare Trump to be an imminent threat to the US and order the military to eliminate the threat and have it be an official act

    • @redstarchrille
      @redstarchrille Před dnem +1

      @@JonathanJames-kk7fv I need some human test subjects they will be perfect if Biden allow me and he's having absulute immunity.

  • @Arational
    @Arational Před dnem +3

    Add Justices to the Court including Neal Katyal.

  • @diomedesrodriguez52
    @diomedesrodriguez52 Před dnem +3

    The American voters who believe in the Constitution, Democracy, and the Rule of Law can put a stop to all these madness. Vote wisely...!

  • @herbertaponte8431
    @herbertaponte8431 Před dnem +35

    A 'Get out of jail,' card has always been the Republican motive!

    • @danyboy1477
      @danyboy1477 Před dnem +1

      Laws for thee, not for me.

    • @moabman6803
      @moabman6803 Před dnem +2

      Bot

    • @Marty_Wanlass
      @Marty_Wanlass Před dnem

      We still have a Democratic President for 6 months. In his purview, can he use this to take the life of a person who is a threat to our Democracy? Just asking for a friend.

    • @jgcalc
      @jgcalc Před dnem

      U ok with everything the dems do?

  • @Soylntgrnisppl
    @Soylntgrnisppl Před 2 dny +49

    Justice Thomas made sure to include in his concurring opinion that he specifically believes that SC Smith was unconstitutionally appointed to that position. Thomas did this, so Judge Cannon in Florida, who just happens to be holding a hearing regarding this same issue, now has specific direction and "support" and "Legal Cover", based upon the SC's decision today, to rule that Smith should not have been appointed. She can dismiss the entire case, if she chooses to, which, obviously is what Thomas and the other Conservatives on the High Court teed up for her to do.

    • @MrBENTON78
      @MrBENTON78 Před 2 dny +4

      True. But that won't be the end. Appeals and more BS SC.

    • @AGLondon2312
      @AGLondon2312 Před 2 dny

      Yes. The MAGA justices are a part of the coup.

    • @matthewmarquisee238
      @matthewmarquisee238 Před dnem +4

      Your comment concerning Thomas' "belief" about SC Smith. Thomas is trying to game the decision. A belief is not a "ruling" and Smith can use that against Cannon, should she try something.

    • @aaronb9630
      @aaronb9630 Před dnem

      This insanely partisan act may just be enough to get him impeached. Nothing in this case had anything to do with this and it's obvious to everyone what it really is.

  • @scottparkin4439
    @scottparkin4439 Před dnem +2

    Mr. Garland needs to take up Mr. Smith's prosecutions immediately before they're dismissed by judicial caveat. Like >that< will ever happen...

  • @donnyriggz
    @donnyriggz Před dnem +2

    Here's the real question that I've not heard anybody ask, if a president is now above the law, can they still be impeached (if what they did is an official act?) If impeachment is possible, could a president then simply, as an official act, dissolve congress thereby removing their power to impeach, because he believes the country is better off with him as president? We've already heard the argument for political assassinations, which could also be used to prevent Congress from having enough votes to impeach.
    "Absolute power corrupts absolutely." - The Supreme Court just gave absolute power to the President of the United States and we have a massively authoritarian candidate campaigning to take over the job.

  • @HeatherRider
    @HeatherRider Před 2 dny +140

    I just woke up to this ruling, and my day is ruined. There is no word in the entire dictionary that can describe how disappointed I am in my own country.

    • @artemisfowl2820
      @artemisfowl2820 Před 2 dny +10

      Don't despair. Vote BLUE this Roevember! ❤️🤍💙

    • @brandilyn6720
      @brandilyn6720 Před 2 dny +1

      You should be disappointed in your own gullibility.

    • @user-lb3gm1vk3m
      @user-lb3gm1vk3m Před 2 dny

      Well go back to sleep like you have been all along

    • @suehowie152
      @suehowie152 Před 2 dny

      ​@@brandilyn6720Why?

    • @user-lb3gm1vk3m
      @user-lb3gm1vk3m Před 2 dny

      Any blue vote is the destruction of America

  • @C.M.30337
    @C.M.30337 Před dnem +43

    What ever happened to Equal Justice Under Law and Nobody is Above The Law?

    • @samstewart9249
      @samstewart9249 Před dnem +3

      What happened? Trump!

    • @moabman6803
      @moabman6803 Před dnem

      Bot?

    • @C.M.30337
      @C.M.30337 Před dnem

      @@samstewart9249 yes, he's Putin's puppet and taking orders from him to destroy our democracy.

    • @JohnWerner-te5zy
      @JohnWerner-te5zy Před dnem

      Those old concepts were thrown out by the Supreme Court justices hand-picked by right-wing elements empowered by conservative justices in "Citizens United".

    • @xU7fr1cx
      @xU7fr1cx Před dnem

      ask your democrat career politician millionaires ;-)

  • @huubvelthuis8988
    @huubvelthuis8988 Před dnem +4

    partial immunity always leads to full immunity.

  • @harolynattar9904
    @harolynattar9904 Před 2 dny +83

    I can't process this at all. We have to vote in numbers that rebuke this and fight for our Country and the future of our families to live in a real democracy!!!!

    • @albertomacias7159
      @albertomacias7159 Před 2 dny

      Trump will win baby stop complaining. Trump is inevitable!!

    • @Bob-bb3ur
      @Bob-bb3ur Před dnem

      Go hug Mommy, you will be ok 😅

    • @lesliecurran1704
      @lesliecurran1704 Před dnem +2

      I feel like I am in mourning. Those people who are celebrating this decision... All I can say to them is be careful what you wish for.

    • @Bob-bb3ur
      @Bob-bb3ur Před dnem

      @@lesliecurran1704 go hug Mommy, you will be ok

    • @lesliecurran1704
      @lesliecurran1704 Před dnem +2

      @@Bob-bb3ur what a trite response to something. It is so important to everybody. You are an example of why we need better education in this country.

  • @fado792
    @fado792 Před 2 dny +45

    Official is what you are sworn in for: to respect the law. To prepare a coup is not where you are sworn in for and thereby unofficial.

    • @BrooklynLilly
      @BrooklynLilly Před dnem +4

      🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯

    • @fishkeeper50
      @fishkeeper50 Před dnem

      The problem in this ruling is the SCOTUS also gave the president the right to deem that a coup is an official act if he and he alone determines that it is necessary to hold on to power. They also made it so any acts he dose can not be used as evidence against him in a court of law. They have gone out of their way to bestow these powers to him and strip away any accountability for any bad acts he chooses to do. Essentially they are trying to make him KING of the United States.

    • @user-pb7ig4sv2l
      @user-pb7ig4sv2l Před dnem +1

      True, but if you can use “official acts” excuse to make it all inadmissible in a court of law, who judges you? Ballot box? Better hope no “official acts “ occur there

    • @DK-zu6tt
      @DK-zu6tt Před dnem

      NO, Presidents give an oath to the Constitution.

  • @davidbeare730
    @davidbeare730 Před dnem +2

    SCOTUS wrote this ruling to give trump a way out. The decision to ignore intent is too antithetical the way laws are applied and punishment is determined. If someone is killed, it's vital to know if it's an accident, an act of hatred, or the result of a violent robbery...etc.

  • @TheGrahamFactor
    @TheGrahamFactor Před 18 hodinami +3

    Joe Biden needs to get SEAL Team Six to get those six conservative judges to the White House and ask them if they'd like to resign and go home tonight

  • @balagan98
    @balagan98 Před 2 dny +33

    BREAKING NEWS: President Biden awarded ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for official acts. Do what you gotta do, Joe!

  • @erinlee7216
    @erinlee7216 Před 2 dny +35

    I don’t recognize the great nation I grew up in. The past few years ...I wish we were a nightmare that I’d wake up from.

    • @user-pb7ig4sv2l
      @user-pb7ig4sv2l Před dnem +3

      Elect a joke president with a gerrymandered system, but I never thought T could cause this much trouble

    • @jaycorby
      @jaycorby Před dnem +3

      I'm almost 79, and could not agree more.

  • @vitadelicatus
    @vitadelicatus Před 15 hodinami +2

    Nobody is safe anymore. What a decision from a corrupt court.

  • @iammaverick4026
    @iammaverick4026 Před dnem +2

    Suddenly Roe v Wade just felt 2nd in the order of priority of decision to be taken care of

  • @reezagibbons465
    @reezagibbons465 Před 2 dny +29

    So Biden can ask as an official act to get the Congress out of office and the justices .

    • @redstarchrille
      @redstarchrille Před dnem +1

      He have the power now to go clean the house :D

    • @tnbrfller
      @tnbrfller Před dnem

      stinky was standing near an open window "official act".

  • @lawandacontreras767
    @lawandacontreras767 Před dnem +25

    The president needs to speak to the people or scotus and explain these details! 💯💯💯 immediately! This affects all American citizens from this day forward! 🤬🤬🤬

    • @wallalalulla
      @wallalalulla Před dnem +4

      He did speak on it today from the White House.

    • @tamararoberson8060
      @tamararoberson8060 Před dnem

      Biden said that he personally would not use the new absolute powers. Considering how much Trump openly adores dictators and kept being blocked during his presidency from becoming one, I don't think Trump will be so restrained.

  • @lisaober731
    @lisaober731 Před 2 dny +28

    I just didn’t believe this could happen. I had so much hope.

    • @marywallace4086
      @marywallace4086 Před dnem

      All sane people hoped it would never happen. Vote for Biden/Harris and then blue down the ballot. Vote for or against amendments also.

  • @Lauracita1980
    @Lauracita1980 Před 2 dny +156

    Why do we talk about rules now? Biden should "officially act" to fix this King-making ruling. He could officially put two more justices on the court right now and officially act to bring this case back to the docket. Dems its time to use the sword they gave us, to fix this. If we hand this over in November we are literally talking King Trump.

    • @RichTheEngineer
      @RichTheEngineer Před 2 dny +1

      No, he can't. U.S. Constitution is clear.

    • @Axolotl_Mischief
      @Axolotl_Mischief Před 2 dny

      Exactly. Giving a President absolute power is going to backfire on them, and they aren't going to like it.

    • @inevitable178
      @inevitable178 Před 2 dny

      HAHA you realize the supreme court is fixing your extreme left democrat ideology of using the chevron doctrine and the justice system to attack there opponents???? your left wing ideology is why were in this position to begin with lol, and your idea now is to change the supreme court cuz you dont like there verdicts?? then sit there and say your for democracy?? i bet you were so proud of the justtice system when all these ridiculous cases against republicans came out, but now you hate the same system that overturned most of it?? your hypocrisy is ridiculous

    • @peacenow4456
      @peacenow4456 Před 2 dny +1

      Four more Justices, to cover all circuits, which are 13, win the House and Win 60 Senate seats, then bring the four new Justices foreward and IMPEACH Alito and Thomas.... they see themselves as demigods now, they will retire regardless in 2025, not 2030 when they are 81-2. They've got billi-$$$$ to spend.

    • @Paul-mg8fz
      @Paul-mg8fz Před 2 dny

      See how you communists react! Trump is immune from fake cases…deal with it. The Supreme Court saw through Judge Chutkan’s idiotic, corrupt ruling.

  • @DavidLiebowitz
    @DavidLiebowitz Před dnem +1

    Bad news on the doorstep - I couldn't take one more step - I can't remember if I cried - When I read about his widowed bride - But something touched me deep inside - The day democracy died😢