Why is the Kh-22 the Real Beast in Russia's Missile Arsenal?
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 01. 2024
- Since the start of the conflict in Ukraine, the specter of Russian missile attacks has loomed large. While hypersonic missiles like the Kinzhal grab headlines, it is the Kh-22, a seemingly less glamorous behemoth, that has Ukrainian air defenses truly worried.
Back in 2000, Ukraine handed over 386 Kh-22 missiles to Russia as part of a repayment for gas debt. Throughout the full-scale invasion, Russian forces have launched approximately 300 Kh-22 missiles at Ukraine, and up until now, none of these missiles have been intercepted or brought down by Ukrainian air defense forces. The Ukrainian air force spokesperson, Yuriy Ignat, openly admitted this fact, emphasizing the serious danger posed by Kh-22 missiles to Ukraine.
In its coverage last December, Moscow's media TASS reported that Ignat highlighted the technical hurdles posed by the Kh-22 missile, underlining the need for specialized means of interception. The missile's speed and trajectory pose a significant challenge for traditional air defense systems.
Ignat specifically noted the Patriot air defense systems as potentially effective against the Kh-22, but their success in the Ukrainian context remains uncertain. Despite receiving Western support in the form of SAMP-T, Patriot, Iris-T, NASAMS, and Crotale air defense systems, Ukrainian authorities argue that the provided systems are inadequate to counter the Kh-22 threat.
What makes this missile particularly challenging to defeat, and why this cold war relic gives Ukraine more chills than the hypersonic Kinzhal?
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv - Věda a technologie
They can't shoot down a Kh-22, but can a Kinzhal. If anyone believes this, you need help.
Exactly 👍
Did the ukrops claim they shot down khinzal lol
The whole anti-Kinzhal campaign that happened in the media after the "Patriot incident" was obviously pre-planned in advanced. For a start, 2 explosions were seen on the Patriot site, they completely ignored this and continued claiming that all Kinzhals had been shot down by the Patriot.
Secondly, the intensity with which they mocked and downplayed the Kinzhal missile didn't make any sense. Defending itself, is the easiest job for any SAM system because even when facing a maneuvering hypersonic missile, in the last stage it has to fly along a predictable path in order to hit. We saw the Patriot system lob 32 interceptor in the air, seconds before the explosions occured. Even if there were no explosions and all Kinzhals were shot down, that doesn't mean the Patriot has an easy time dealing with them. The primary purpose of a SAM system is to provide a protection umbrella over high value targets and this is where the Patriot fails because the Kinzhal missile reduces its effective range significantly. Thus, when you have SAM system intercept any ballistic missiles successfully, you cannot simply draw the conclusion that the ballistic missile is useless. The whole thing was a US military industrial complex directed psychological operation created to promote the Patriot systemand and downplay Russian weapons in general.
@@Mr.Brownstain-xf2ne CNN has run several articles with AFU members showing "Kinzhal parts" and saying they shot it down. 😂😂😂
@@trevorsutherland5263
C N N ? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Can we just pause for a moment to admire just how badass the Tu-22 Backfire is 😎
Absolutely
My wife owns the flat she grew up in which used to be base housing at Dyagilevo Air Base in Ryazan, Russia which has been a bomber training base and officer academy for many years. The husband of my son's godmother (my wife's niece) just completed or has almost completed officer training their. Whenever I get to go, I sit on the balcony and in the afternoon until evening I watch the bombers fly overead. I especially like the sound of the turboprop bomber TU-95 (Bear) as occasionally one would stop by the base. I don't like war, but understand it happens, but there is something about seeing these big aircraft flying overhead and landing a half mile (from one end of strip) from your flat just gets your blood pumping. Due to health reasons I haven't been back in a few years, but hope to go next summer as flights are expensive for us and we just had an expensive roof repair done. But hopefully I can go next year and tour the museum they have next to the air base, the pics looks interesting.
Если вы говорите о самолете, в начале то это Ту-160. Хотя носитель кинжалов - это МИГ-31БМ. Но стоит согласиться, что Ту-160 (Белый лебедь) - это настоящее произведение искусства.
If you are talking about an airplane, at the beginning it is a Tu-160. Although the carrier of the kinzhal is the MIG-31BM. But we have to agree that the Tu-160 (White Swan) is a real work of art.
I'm sorry, but the Tu-22 and Tu-22M have significant differences. The Tu-22M is a bomber that can also carry the Kinzhal missile. And the Tu-22 is just a supersonic Soviet aircraft that was discontinued.
In a way they are right in saying they manged to intercept a Kinzhal with Patriot when the Kinzhall struck the Patriot battery on the ground.
Dude, you made my day :)
Infrastructural AA defence🙃
funny. Ukraine cannot shoot down significantly slower missiles, but has shot down 10 hypersonic ones)
it is indeed magical thinking by drug consumption.
They also have 1:10 kill ratio and apparently Russian soldiers are stealing UKR washing machines for the missile navigation modules...
Moreover, we steal Ukrainian toilets because we don’t have our own + we ate all the hedgehogs because our store shelves are empty@@mmazourov
@@user-xe1lx3og4n - LOL 🙂
And Putin already died 50 times of cancers and several other health issues... Oh! And the shovels, people always forget the shovels. ;-)
@@FindanDandy Magic mushrooms ;) 😂
15 out of 10 kindzals were shot down by Ghost of Kiev .
And he hasn't boarded the plane yet
😂😂😂.. who told this figure that joker 🤡 and beggar zelensky. I think he personally visited to your home to share this information😂😂😂😂😂
Are they still fighting in Ukraine? I haven't been paying attention. I'm SURE Russia is near Kiev by now.
Maybe they already called up the Avengers. 😅😊😂
Ukrainian propaganda will tell you that they are almost near victory against Russia
RU has some incredible washing machines powering these things...
For a secondary nation and gas station to the World the technological level of its arms is astonishing. May be the Russians were slightly underestimated. 😊
RIP Johnny
@@user-sd9dp7pw4z Well, wait t‘il you see the new Oldsmobile!
Can you imagine when Satan told John McCain that Russia is destroying the entire Western world, that they weren't really a gas station masquerading as a country 😅😅
Harmless responses get deleted here on YT so much on freedom of speach. Watch out!
Россию всегда недооценивают.А она живёт,и по многим параметрам превосходит страны Запада.
remember, the Khinzel flies at 11 mach. Its punch is not just its explosives; it is its kinetic energy. the faster a missile goes, the more important kinetic explosiveness is, rather than the explosive it carries. the Kinetic energy alone of a 10 Mach missile can break a ship in half.
remember, they re not hypersonic when they reach their target
@@Vrey662 That would mean less than half as slow, though.
@@Vrey662
You are hopeless
@@Vrey662Of course not, this is why their flight speed phases exist. A tungsten tipped shell would slice an aircraft carrier in half!😂
It's like Mach 3 to Msch 3.9 once it hits its target. It's a short range ballistic missile. The larger the ballistic missile, the higher and faster it comes down during terminal speed. An Icbm comes down around Mach 4-5.5
The speed and agility of the Kh-22 make it invincible in the face of the Ukrainian air defense, according to the Ukrainians themselves. The Kinzhal is agile, hypersonic, and due to the plasma layer formed by the friction around it, invisible for radar. Still, some want us to believe that the same systems that fail to down even one out of 300 Kh-22's manages to score a 10 out of 10 on the Kinzhal?
Only CNN people believe that. No serious observer believes that.
It is Ukraine. In 22, after one of the attacks, they officially announced that they shot down 110 missiles out of 100😁
nothing especial about this missile yet acording to russia, its another super hyper weapon, sure
There is nothing special about it, they have multiple hypersonic missiles and China just created a hypersonic smart shell weapon...@@Vrey662
nothing special - it’s an American tamahawk, which was never able to hit the Syrian airfield, getting lost in the desert@@Vrey662
Ukraine claims 10 out of 10m hypersonic Kinzals intercepted? If you believe that I've got a bridge to sell you. Actually all 10 Kinzals were intercepted...by their targets
May I buy that bridge? I qualify for a 30% discount. I brought down this missile last week by hand sling
😂😂😂😂The Whitehouse and pentagon are for sale. I own them.
10 out of 10 only confirms zero interception.
Make peace you fools.
Yes, like Dempsey and Makepeace.
Russia has to stop Kiev junta - an irregular army of US state "elites" under command of the Pentagon.
Господь бог вы очень умный. Иди покушай и попей.
Whit peace the military industrial complex don't make money 💰.
Nato wants to kill
From Ukrains report, Russia has already surrendered to Ukrain's forces!
Ukr liars propaganda.
The hell??
😂
It's true that Ukraine shot down 10 of 10 Kinzhal. Here the detail : 5 with slingshot, 3 with bow and 1 with hand thrown stones, the last one goes back himself because he was scared.
Intercept a kinzhal? That's simply untrue.
So a couple things about the Kinzhal, It flies it's path at high altitude during it's hypersonic phase to avoid dense air resistance. It also uses EW features that present RADAR afterimages and "decoy signitures" that can be difficult to distinguish rapidly from the real missile, and for a period of it's flight it can not easily maneuver and is covered in a RADAR absorbing plasma cloud. The fact that it closes the distance so rapidly is one of the biggest challenges to shooting it down. You need a density of air defense to have a launch in the correct placement for when you can a fire solution that will intercept it. The missile will drop from hypersonic speeds to super sonic and begin maneuvers and use satellite guidance and possibly some form of seeker. It simply isn't plausible to shoot down this missile with a small number of launchers reliably. Rumors are from supposed inside sources, that in the best case the likelihood of a successful interception is about 15% for 2 Interceptors. Ukraine may have shot down a couple when pairing the MIM-104 launchers with Israel's advanced rapid response Iron dome RADARs and telemetry systems. The true difficulty of intercepting the missiles is due to the shortness of time available for a firing solution and the current placement of launchers. You can't get around this fact. It is also confounded by the fact that the original RADAR systems paired with the Patriot systems were confounded by the decoys which is why Ukraine also got the number of missiles fired wrong. Truth be told, if it wasn't for Space based reconnaissance of Russian air fields and E-3 sentry patrols/AWACs. The on the ground RADAR units would be lit-up by their RADAR signatures and have far more limited coverage. NATO is very creative in trying to fight a "not-war" with Russia. Any bystanders can see that these are, in fact, acts off war regardless of whether Ukrainians fingers push the final button. the real problem for NATO going forward is the lack of availability of interceptors. 10/10 Kinzhals shot down is such as exaggerated joke of a claim to make anyway.
Absolutely well said.
I don't even believe that any ever was. The Ukrainian general staff lies about everything! Not even inaccurate information but outright lies. Nothing in the Ukrainian skies can achieve the speed of a kinzhal or the Maneuvering Gs to intercept it. They can't intercept a Kh-22, they can't even intercept an Iskander M just yet but they have intercepted a couple of Kinzhals already. Wow! Great feat. What's left is improving on their lying capability because this is not even good enough propaganda.
Also, the fact that the Earth is curved, these missiles could fly above the ocean and by the time any navy registers it's coming, it's coming in too fast and there is little to no time to react. USA invested all it's might into NAVY based superiority while Russians simply developed a missile to counter this. What good is a three carrier group hosting hundreds of raptors and lightnings when one missile can remove them from the playing field.
FROM THE NETHERLANDS.
PUTIN, WE LOVE YOU AND WE LOVE RUSSIA.
Maybe you should change ‘we’ in ‘I’, and just speak for yourself?
@@lolkevandewitte1713 Looking at the likes.....it is "we"....
@@seven7ns wow, all 41 of you (not necessarily all being Dutch…) on a population of 17.7 million people! Impressive!
The Russian Hypersonic Kinzhals missiles are almost impossible to being down, especially by Patriot airdefence systems, which were designed in the 70s...and periodicly updated but retained all their original limitations. This is why western airdefences can't shoot down Russian Hypersonics:
First, Hypersonics have faster speeds.
Second, Hypersonics have changing trajectories on route to targets.
Third, Hypersonics detect launched airdefence missiles, and avoid collusion with these missiles.
Forth, Hypersonics act in groups, like wolf packs, with decoys, and can change targets at anytime. Every missiles hasan assigned 'role' in the pack. This is nothing new in Russian technology. It existed since the late 70s in the Soviet Airforce. I served with it, as a radar operator and s300 missile system launcher... henceforth I saw first hand why these Soviet weapons work so well, and are very reliable. The s300 was also used as an artillery..vertually devastating all enemy sides.
From all the Zelensky Nato claims that I have seen about bringing down Russian Hypersonics, I concluded only political and propaganda value...as Zelensky tried ao hard to please US donors, and show some achievement for all the investments the west poured into his bank account.
However, in reality, everything he said was just comedy joke... from someone who has no clue about military technology... especially by the Russian Federation side.
But sooner or later, all liers get found out.
There is only one country that can shot down hypersonic cruise missiles : Russia.
Simply because they are the only one who have hypersonic cruise missiles.
Shooting down hypersonic ballistic missiles (multiple countries have them) is very difficult, close to impossible...unless it's Russia, because ballistic hypersonic missiles are far easier to down compared to hypersonic cruise missiles...and Russia already have the AD able to do it.
Nobody else have this AD systems.
Да С500 могут сбивать гиперзвуковую ракету ,но они ещё не поступили в серию
@@ViTeK9The S500 is already in production and was already deployed more than a year ago
@@ViTeK9 the s500 is already doing work. It was rumoured a couple years ago through back channels and a slip up from a russian oligarch that the s700 was being or was completed
@@rigorocks23 то что разработка новых систем ведётся нет не каких сомнений, никто не остановится на достигнутом,это вопрос времени когда они поступят на вооружение
Depends on how much time between when the missile is detected, & an AA missile can travel to it before it reaches target. the US has THAAD for ICBM which are also hypersonic (up to mach 17). But very unlike able to shoot down short range hypersonic missiles.
I thank you so much to reports you give us. The way you report , giving details leaves no stone unturned. Surely thank you . At least now we know that American weapons are not superior . Russia has more superior weapons. May God be with Putin and Russia at large
Вообще ни "патриот" ни "ириска" не одной ракеты ни сбили In general, neither the “patriot” nor the “toffee” shot down a single missile
The Patriot is a old missile system.
Most of Russian missiles and drones are destroyed by excellent air defences
@@davidrickwood5924 этой ракете х22 60 лет!!! не смогли сбить не одну!!! а новые сбивают?
@@borbouhbi8649 они модернизацию прошли
@@user-ub3wh9mb7r ну и? все проходит модернизацию, новые они как сбивают?
The U.S and NATO will come up with there own versions of the Kh-22, give it a new name, then claim they created the missile.
Sorry, but the NATO engineers and scientists are a joke. They can't even design something better then the crappy 40+ years old Tomahawk...and you believe they can do what Russians do?
Please...
or perhaps make one that actually works unlike all Russian myths so far
@@alangunningham5667
tell it to 60 French servicemen who intercepted one of such myths in Kharkov lately
@@alangunningham5667 Oh they work my friend, they certainly do work! Just because you see a pic of one "fallen off" the airplane missile, completely intact, it doesn't mean that they all like that! Usually it means that the jet that was carrying it wasn't serviced for ages or had a prob with a pylon, or the rocket itself was taken from an old ass stock which had a 1974 use by date! But most of them do pound Ukraine and hit it very precisely, so yeah, they do work and very well of that!! 😉🇷🇺👌 What, you've never heard of American JDAMS not hitting their targets due to malfunctions and stuff like that? Cmon man, it's war my friend, everything happens here!!! 😜🇷🇺👍🇷🇺💪🇷🇺👏
@@aleksandrpulnikov684 do you actually believe that ?? if the missile was as good as it is claimed this would have already happened and been publicly displayed ... funny that hasn't happened ??? lol ...as I stated it's all Russian propaganda like most of the Russian claims ... if some were truthful we might believe some of the lies, but every claim made by the Russians about equipment is proved to be fake!
An "oldie", but a "goodie"! Congratulations Comrades!😂😂😅❤❤❤
"Старый конь борозды не испортит" 😅 надеюсь гугл переводчик справится правильно с переводом
Why fix it if it ain't broken ?
The Russians have been beaten badly on air sea and ground.thwir weapons are outdated
Russia has been the the first country to give missiles capabilities for "swarm attacks". Already the Granite anti-ship missile from the 80's has this capabilty. Here one high flying Granite might track the targets, and relay the information to several other low flying Granite missiles. If the high flying missile is shot down, another Granite will take over its place. The high flying missiles might all get shot down, but they might still guide a number of the low flying missiles to hit one or more targets.
Probably because they are much cheaper, therefore a lot more of them, and while they can be shot down, you need a high end AA system to do it, MANPADs or point defense not enough. They move at supersonic speed and pack a wallop when they hit. Doesn't have the "street cred" of the Kinzhal or Iskander, but probably accounts for most of the dirty necessary work. Also, I had no idea the Kh-32 can withstand hits from 20mm shells and AA missile fragments. That is flat out incredible.
That... is not a good explanation. I'm sorry but that falls completely flat. kh-22 is also important and no one is going "the Russian bombers are coming, get the MANPADS".
yep.. it cant be shot down.. it has self defense capabilities and even 2 atomic bombs on its shell cant bring her down.. She flies mach 378 and ukraines air defense got killed in the first week because of that. it can even hack in your iphone to call you.
I'm sure a large Pac2 Gem C missile could knock it out of sky especially when 2 are fired at each missile. That's 100kgs of explosives each missile hitting near the explosive part of the kh22.
It is a huge missile, but US has been shooting these missiles in real target for 4 decades!
"Also, I had no idea the Kh-32 can withstand hits from 20mm shells and AA missile fragments."
Likely because the missiles do not fly in a predicable flight path. They alter the path of travel. AA only works if the missile follows a straight path.
Nothing is invincible. You can shoot down a hypersonic missile but you'll probably need 20 missiles with the same price as hyper one.
The math is clear. Defending this way will have you bankrupt in few months because each one costs $15 million @ least
It's another super weapon uniquely improved.
Советские дети, стали взрослыми.
Soviet relics updated. hundreds, thousands, or tens of thousands, depending on what's on hand.
С советских времён остались сотни тысяч боеприпасов,их сейчас модернизируют и отправляют на Украину
это ту 22 м3
Crude but effective
Ukraine has never shot down a kinzhal missile. They have stated they have but there is no evidence they have. It is beyond Ukraine's ability to do so. Please get your facts right before making these videos.
Not a single word coming from Ukraine can be taken seriously.
Azerbaijan has with Barak system over Baku in 2020, November 9. Kinzhal is an air-to-land version of Iskander missile.
@@plotonapolonich5513
Okay very interesting.
Even the ukrainian generals came out later and admitted they had not been able to shoot down a single Kinzhal missile.
Most important is the US, currently doesn't have active serving similar type of such missles.
But the US has a secret weapon: Adm. Rachel Levine protecting us from climate change.
That’s crazy , they pay them in 386 missiles and 24 years later they are all shot at them .
The Russians are just giving them back.
That was when the relation between the two countries was cordial. It all changed with the coup in 2014 and the Bandera worshippers came to power. Then the mass murder of Russians started and the interdictions on even the use of Russian. This led to the armed insurrection of the Russians living in the historic Russian regions annexed by the Ukraine at the independence. In 2022, Russia interfered in this civil war as guarantor of the Russian population in accordance with the Minsk agreements. Now the missiles are flying.
all year 22 and even now Ukraine is fighting with Soviet weapons, which it received along with the secession, huge reserves of weapons that were never dreamed of by all NATO supplies in 2 years
Khinzal renders Carrier Battle Groups obsolete. US Colonel Douglas McGregor.
Surprisingly the Patriot has not shot down the KH22 but has shot down the Kinzhals???
Thats a good looking plane
If you are talking about an airplane, at the beginning it is a Tu-160. Although the carrier of the kinzhal is the MIG-31BM. But we have to agree that the Tu-160 (White Swan) is a real work of art.
Ukrainian dictionary 2022: WORDS are louder than ACTIONS. 😂😂 self satisfaction of ukranian forces. Poor guys.
Complimenti alla grande federazione Russa
Complimenti al grande Esercito Rosso Z
Complimenti alla grande Marina Russa
Complimenti al grande Presidente Putin il numero uno su questa terra il Dio del mondo intero
Imagine that UA say: we cant intercept Kinzhal...ofc they gonna say we got them all...
Ukraine has shot down 20 out of 12 missiles 😂
Wrong,they shot down 100 of the 10 launched😮
🤣🤣🤣🤝🇷🇺
Advert war but even then people can see through thei lies!
Oh gawd! Ukraine shot down 10 out of 10 Kinzhal’s. With what???? Patriots???? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Ukraine was able to shot down all 10 KH47 Kinsall missiles... All 10, of the 8 (eight) Russia launched! The levels of efficiency are always trough the roof. LOL 🙂
Next is Ghost of Kiev, again!
And the shovels, jeez the damned shovels!!
That's my Russia
When it comes to Russian Missiles...there is absolutely no match for them, these missiles have the speed of bullet...
The modern periodic table arranged a Russian scientist
Too bad this site quotes western news reports, which have a 2% probability of being correct. Otherwise technical info is good.
No a single kh 22 has been brought down...but they killed the kinhzal...?
Does this mean that US aircraft carrier battle groups are obsolete?
Yes. American Colonel McGregor said that.
Мало кто знает, но еще Российская Империя вела передовые разработки ракетного вооружения.
И противники этого были.. собственные генералы..😢
For sure these missiles are not cheap.
Russian hardware stand up and effective against the Western Hatdware...One Nation against many...In the war Russian material is impressive....at the start of the war Russia was using old hardware but now especially their artillery have really impressed me...any country buying Russian hardware are in good hands🥇
Великая Россиюшка я безконечно безвозмездно и безкорыстно и всецело люблю ❤😘тебя советую заговорщикам украины и сша молиться чтобы наше командование не сделало из вас Хиросиму и Нагасаки
oui la russie va milplie ces missle de missile se l´KH 32 ou KH 22
Ukraine air-defense is invincible, Patriot system destroys 110% of Kinzhals fired. Who cares if its Mach 10 or 11, big deal, its easy to shoot down. But the Kh-22 at Mach 4? That's an impossible task.
Я не сомневаюсь, что сейчас есть окно возможностей, пока нато не имеет сверхзвука, надо добивать этих разжигателей войн!
It's not a full scale invasion.
The X-22 that is in service with the Russian army is not the same as the X-22 that was introduced into service in the 1960s. The original X-22 missiles were upgraded to the X-22M variant after a few years, the original inaccurate X-22s were not produced for very long. All used in Ukraine are M variants with improved accuracy and X-32 deeply upgraded variants produced after 1990. The original X-22 could only carry the Tu-22, the Tu-22M3 could only carry the upgraded variants and the original could not.
Как противокорабельная ракета может быть не точной? Там стояла радиолокационная головка наведения.
@@user-ir5sh2kk7c It was inaccurate in that the first X-22 only recognized a ship above the surface, for attacks on land targets the circular deviation was very large. There was also a relatively large inaccuracy in ship targets. The inertial navigation system was not perfect. Radar guidance had great inaccuracies.
Inertial system (autopilot) of the APK-22 type with radio-command correction and active radar homing warhead (guidance based on the reflection of electromagnetic radiation of the homing warhead from the target)
Therefore, only X-22M variants were produced for the TU-22M2 aircraft from 1974, and all modifications were then based on this improved variant.
the inaccuracy of radar guidance given by frequency, repetition rate, signal modulation, signal processing and its delay in the autopilot apparatus. It is the same as with anti-aircraft missiles, for higher accuracy, high frequencies must be used, the lower the frequency, the higher the inaccuracy.
@@KorbenDalasCZПочему вы решили, что на этих ракетах не ставят новые системы наведения, также как на ФАБ-500 с умпк.
@@user-ir5sh2kk7c all current x-22s are better than the original variant.
It's impressive how cold War Era weapons are sufficient for today's battle
I don't get it why Russia do not use tochka-u missiles? I know they are retired, but they have it in large numbers.
i think they are short range.
Tochka-u are outdated 2019 from the Russian army and replaced with Iskander Models.
Украина било по мирным точкой - у. Если бы мы ее использовали, то нас бы обвинили и в атаке кассетным боеприпасом донецка и вокзала краматорска
Wonderful weapon
Can withstand hits from SAMs? I'd like to see proof of that.
You won't, that video is 5 years in a Ukrainian prison or a trip to the meatgrinder
@@Awaken2067833758 Surely Russia can provide proof of this obtained during testing.
and yet another Russian wonder weapon is about to be launched. But you don't see any of them on the battlefield.
of course they can shoot down the Kinzhal. in fact out of three that was launched they've managed to shoot down seven! - and they did it without igniting the booster of the Patriot.
Long time we have been hearing stories, we have this, we have developed this e t c, from the same people, so they thought their friends were sleeping, praising them
But...But, Ukraine is winning...
Ukraine is advancing...To the Polak border, that is 🤣🤣🤣
Remember in March - April 2022 ? Our Western Propaganda Outlets ( M S M ) plastered all over the news, " Russia is running out of missiles " 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.......Do you also remember in the early - to mid 2023, Russia wascusing shovels to defeat the Ukronazis ? Apparently those shovels went hypersonic 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
We used up all the washing machines on these rockets, simultaneously eating the last of the hedgehogs😂
But but but…. It did take Putin’s special operation only three days to reach Kiev! Or didn’t it….🤔
@lolkevandewitte1713
Putin said that " 3 days "
Dude that was the western propaganda outlets ( M S M ) that splattered that worldwide
Do some research research, get educated...
Do you know when this Senseless Bloodshed in Ukraine began
Not necessarily, they they employ those missiles on critical targets they believe will endanger their forces
Kinzhal ist niemals abgeschossen wurden.
The missile is manufacutred for a compex WW III scenario,so there is a need for more sofisticated anti missile ,systems.
EVERY DAY I LOVE RUSSIA EVEN MORE!
Civilian apartment buildings beware!
But it doesn't have a big enough warhead. It looks like a strategic weapon being used with a small conventional warhead.
I am sure it can accept a nuclear warhead if needed just like the Kinzhal missile.
может быть ядерной это точно
The kh-32 conventional warhead is the same size as the one in the tomahawk, the one in the kh-22 is two times that
In the 90ies US Intel was shocked to find out just how big it's warhead really was when they finally managed to get solid information on it, it's over 1,000kg, a single one could cripple or sink a supercarrier.
Song/theme?
Those Airdefence sytems are NOT Ukrainian, but US systems. And there is plenty doubt that they are aissting in their operation too.
Ukraine will send satellite to Mars soon with the help of Poland.
I've red somewhere long time ago, that those rockets start to behave wildly,or they start to maneuver like crazy, when they are close to the target!
I honestly don't know,if that's true! 😅
They don't travel in a straight path in order to avoid AA systems & AA missile systems.
Kh22/32 was created for attack fighter carriers. So they was created for penetrating SAM systems
so KH32 is a flying tank that can eat up anti air hits but its still a rocket itself :D WOW Russians
I bet Putin has the best washing machines on earth 😅😊
Then how to defeat that missile if it enablles to communicate with other missiles, that would be braking nerves of defence operators to counter the treat..make Peace is the way to stop the missile
I am no expert in any military subject, but I heard that Ukrainian alleged downing Kinzal, were none other than the much older versions of kinzel I.e Eskandar Rockets. Which naturally Russia would use it a lot. But who knows ?
This guy is on Ukrainian weed.
kh-22 able to withstand hit from air defenses? is this an armored missile?
of course they will
Why Russia constantly launches cruise and ballistic missiles over the Caspian sea aiming western Ukraine and Kiev?
The Patriot never worked
🇷🇺🇧🇾🇵🇱❤
To know if they are lying or not you have to ask the Ghost from Kiev, she will surely tell you the truth🤣🤣🤣.
Evergreen Soviet technology
Stoltenberg and zelensclown
Just soiled their shorts
😂
Those Ukrainian shopping malls better watch out!
Very simple , because it is relatively cheap it an be mass produced.
Ukrainian military can lie as their Western countries backers 😂😂😂😂😂😂
unlike putin and russia.. they took kiev in 2 days.
so much power.. and still, they cant get another few settlements.. hmm.
We need lasers!
only 300? this is pathetic
They are going to make it better.
Now zircon
You better believe Russia will continue to use their missiles to maximum capacity!!
Shovels wins
The only problem is that western air defense systems as soon as they apply mig 31 or TU 22 immediately know what to expect. But the more planes there are enough to carry these missiles, the more difficult it will be.
If you are talking about an airplane, at the beginning it is a Tu-160. Although the carrier of the kinzhal is the MIG-31BM. But we have to agree that the Tu-160 (White Swan) is a real work of art. ту-22.. ты уже второй кто спутал ))))
I'm sorry, but the Tu-22 and Tu-22M have significant differences. The Tu-22M is a bomber that can also carry the Kinzhal missile. And the Tu-22 is just a supersonic Soviet aircraft that was discontinued.
@@RU_Aleks Many thanks for the explanation but it's really not necessary, whether I added one letter or a number that you omitted absolutely does not matter for what I wanted to say! Kinđal can carry both TU 160 and SU 34 and some versions of SU 35, what is most important is exactly what I said, the more Russian aircraft can be a carrier not only for Kindjal but also for other cruise missiles, the greater the West will have to shoot them down, in essence it is much better To launch missiles from the air than from the ground, which is logical given that the missile has a greater range and speed, it would be best for Russia if it managed to produce a number of MiG-35s that could carry cruise missiles because it is the cheapest and fastest solution for Russia.
@@velimirkolundzija4451 Нет, только два самолета являются носителями ракеты "кинжал", это бомбардировщики миг-31 и ту-22м так как эти два самолета имеют наибольшую скорость палета 2800км/ч и 2300км/ч
@@velimirkolundzija4451 No, the Kinzhal missile is carried by only two aircraft, these are Mig-31 and Tu-22m bombers, since these two aircraft have a maximum flight speed of 2800 km/h and 2300 km/h.
KH-22 is highy inaccurate and has landed on many civilian targets in Ukraine.