NATO allies loosening restrictions on weapons for Ukraine? | DW News
Vložit
- čas přidán 31. 05. 2024
- Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy has canceled all of his planned foreign trips as Russia intensifies its attacks on the eastern Kharkiv region. This new offensive began last week, taking advantage of Ukraine's shortages of weapons, following delays in Western supplies. But Ukraine says the Russian side is suffering record numbers of casualties and the Ukrainian army has been aiming to disrupt Russia's supply lines by striking inside Russia itself.
00:00 Background
03:47 George Barros, Institute for the Study of War
Subscribe: czcams.com/users/deutsche...
For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
Follow DW on social media:
►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
►Twitter: / dwnews
►Instagram: / dwnews
►Twitch: / dwnews_hangout
Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch
#ukraine #russia #ukrainewar
Hat's off for UK;- allowing Ukraine to use their weapons in Russia!
The UK has a real leader, we have a real-world JOKE in the US.
Russia attacking using Iranian drones, N Korea weapons WHY Ukraine can do the same? NO case!
Because Ukraine has already been doing it?
@@Gman3.0 Nope, Ukraine only used his own drones to blast Russian oil refineries, oil depots, ammo depots. bridges, tunnels, train stations, railways hub, power stations, etc
@@AlexanderKorshinsky they used nato drones to blast Russia Russia is using their allies drones to blast them back same thing
Ukraine could try. Let's see what Putin would do.
@@springsummer7138 Try what exactly ? Are you talking about allies missiles. They did yesterday in Crimea and Russia (Novosibirks) and a refinery down the same region among four of the location.
One of the most ridiculous war engagement in history like during a fist fight, you're not allowed to hits opponent's face, neck and abdomen
The problem is that the opponent has a gun.
@@f.5233which they are using to threaten, but not to kill
They will for sure. But they want other gunmen there. Russia wanted the boses and wanted to bleed the victim to death. @zwillinge3116
@@zwillinge3116 unless they're cornered. Why would you own a guy and not use it if you're at the risk of perishing?
Ukraine is supposed to fight with one hand tied behind their back.
Should have never been restricted...
These restrictions are just silly, like putting handcuffs on a boxer and expecting him to fight
This is absolutely ridiculous, so many lives were waisted . And still, it continues . This is insanity.
There's no rules in war...
Would you want to live under Putin?
Putin can end the war he started any day - the question is will he?
Tell Putin that! 😅
No restriction should be
when you fight for your own survival
Funny, that’s Russia’s point of view as well.
@@jonathanjacob5453 That means Russia will understand why they are striked
@@seselis1 Exactly and the countries doing the striking (Britain) will understand that Russia is not Iraq. They can expect to get something in return.
No one should do any crying. Take your action and accept the consequences.
@@jonathanjacob5453 Russia fighting for its survival? Get real. Little Ukraine sends over a few drones and you think you are fighting for survival. If NATO actually joined in, even that would be only to liberate Ukraine. No one wants Russia. You've been fed lies.
exactly
So i hope they don't cry afterwards!
Zelensky digging own grave..
The British will be crying afterwards and their state media will be reporting that it was an unprovoked attack.
@@jonathanjacob5453 Putin is crying now and his state media is reporting that it is an unprovoked support.
@@jonathanjacob5453🤣 Russia won't dare, would stand no chance against NATO
@@Tom-ct6rp 🤣🤣🤣
the guest deliberately failed to mention Russia's threat that it will retaliate against British assets in Ukraine and beyond if British weapons are used against peaceful Russian cities, which led Britain to take a step back from its warmongering!
The stash on that guy, my God! That must have been some bet he lost. How does the other guy keep serious?
You look more funny let's be honest.
@@acajoom my man, the sexy squirrel!
@@shuycg haha
It is different. But he looks the way he looks, his choice
That’s my boy from college, man. Chill
Blinking man needs to tour around the Ukrainian border with his concerts to boost morale
I'm there now. Looks fine to me.
Morale and capabilities are GO!
😂😂😂
He shows up with $2 billion and you want him to also put himself in danger for a dirt poor country that only Putler wants. We have given more than Ukraine is worth already.
That's your opinion
"Blinking man" made me chuckle 😄
That man’s mustache identifies as a woman’s favorite mustache for hitting the 1930’s formal wear theme night at the ladies who love ladies bar
Spot on! :D
The rich (Politician kids) are benefiting from this war while the poor suffers.
The history of humanity in a nutshell. During peace we are ground up and poisoned for profits, in war our young die for profits.
Orcssia started.
Orcssia pays.
@@simonthekindcutthroat6324 Not quite. It used to be that you stood no chance of becoming the leader without having stood the test of war borne personally. Nowadays, the politicians never work in any real world job let alone fight.
A couple of rich orcs in london should get a visit.
This has nothing to do with the information in this vid.
No rich kid or rich person on the Ukraine side started this war.
You're speaking in generic phrases
Western weapon striking inside Russian territory makes it legitimate for Russian weapon strike inside NATO territory.
Sure, if Russia can find a country that is fighting Nato, it has every right to supply this country with weapons.
If on the other hand you are talking about direct Russian strikes against Nato territory, then of course Nato has the right to directly strike Russian territory. (not just by giving Ukraine 1% of its weapons, but by using the other 99%)
Why is it that Putin fans constantly act as if Nato could not strike back in case Russia would directly attack them? And why don´t Putin fans understand that Nato can always answer any Russian attack with ten times as much force.
Nato is A LOT stronger than Russia. Get over it!
russia is using Iranian and north Korean weapons to strike inside Ukraine. What is the difference?
@thegreatdane3627 difference is ukraine has no muscles to hit ukraine or to start a war wit ukraine...russia remember is a superpower doing that it will make them retalliate
@@emazjassam2452 make sense please?
@@thegreatdane3627is that a Swiss flag? So the Swiss can’t read?😂
If Iran drones and North Korea's weapons were fired to Ukrainians, what stops Ukraine to also fire to the Russians, either the weapons come from Europe or wherever...
Because Russia is a world power who no one wants to poke
Ukraine is not an ally of nato or eu officially just on words while NK and Iran is officially Russian supporters etc
@@leto2582 NO! utterly meaningless distinction between the very important Iranian cooperation (with actual ppl on the ground training on Ru & maybe Ukr lands) & western support for Ukr, albeit, yes, western support has almost no ppl on ground in Ukr. But the real question is why? Imho there is now nothing stopping a slow rise of western help and western expertise working closely with Ukr, including on the ground if necessary, which is probably is. As an american liberal, i am hoping that we are already on the ground. In any case, within a decade, RU will be contained, or there will be no success on earth of any type, whatsoever, and we will all descend into what 'conservatives' worldwide want, a nationalistic antogonistic hellscape where the most basic things cannot be done any longer! (let alone climate mitigation! lol)
Its like fighting with one hand tie behind you back and your fans expecting you to win!
While the other fighter uses his two hands.SMH
4:44 in the same video it is claiming that Belgarod is getting hit also that military assets in Belgarod are not getting hit.
Where are the long touted F16s? Will they make a significant difference?
Supposedly going to be there in a month or so, and the one thing Ukraine lacks is a significant airforce. Having the amount of Jets that were promised will make a heck of a difference. The F-16 is a fantastic platform.
@@jacobnewcombe5367it was a typo. The writer of the article wrote “month” instead of “months”
They quickly apologized but by then it was too late and everyone thinks next month!
Greg terry a pro Ukraine CZcamsr who has many connections in Ukraine and visits frequently guesses September!
I believe someone who’s experienced the war for themselves and not just the thousands of armchair generals on social media who repost articles
No
Norway also gave a few recently with the implicit wish that Ukraine would use them deep into Russia.
Probably to take out the military factories.
They are coming... there has been delays, and they´ve focused on best possible training, and might have updated some stuff in the F-16´s.
While they WILL help, it´s hard to say how big difference they make.
F-16 is an OLD plane, and it´s no Raptor 22, or F-35 ... it will help deliver bombs to the front, and it will increase the possibility to shoot down some missiles and drones.... but with Russian S-300 and S-400 you can´t simply get air superiority like that.
Ukraine's border regions can only be defended by striking inside Russia from where an attack is mounted, that's elementary logic.
All we have to do is wait for what out of pocket response the will be delivered by the Kremlin
agree 100%
It's elementary logic that this will escalate the war, Gefreiter Pauli ! 🙃
more common sense elementary logic is such things will result in furthur escalation and furthur creation of buffer zone in ukraine side desperate west is using mad man logic committing same mistake again and again last 2.5 yrs gone in astray try more
@@eddastrohmayer251
Bring it on, orkz.
They should not cry when Russia hit back harder.
Does Russia cry? Does Russia make empty nuclear threats? They do. We have seen it with our own eyes.
@@willthecat3861you would rather the nuclear threats aren’t empty?😂bc me too
I don't think that all can start with nuclear weapon. Conventional missiles will do.
@@pavelslutsky3114 Russian media doesn't put it like that. Russian media talks about nuking everyone that opposes the Kremlin viewpoint. And many Russians appear to agree. Russian media/radio/tv doesn't explain what will happen to Russia, and Russians if Kremlin uses nuclear weapons on the West. Is it an epidemic of simple mindedness, or just BS?
Don't you prefer empty nuclear threats im..e@@willthecat3861
yeah those restrictions need to be removed yesterday.
What else is left really? Russia is jamming everything.
We collected all of EU flags already😂makes no difference now
Norwegians in Mariupol, French in Avdeevka, Americans everywhere, British at home behind the computer😂
@@lettheflamestakeover7374 Buying EU flags from Ebay isn't impressive, vatnik
No, don't risk an escalation!
so Russia is complaining about losing "dozens" after 2 years and the guy in command at bucha was made a hero? why are we playing softball with these tools? they arent going to stop unless we stop them.
🙌
You're playing? You're sitting on your couch and shitpossting .If you guys are so bloodthirsty and brave - go on , Ukraine needs volunteers,new land was just recently converted to host another 1.5 millions kia
you will stop someone!! hahahaha.,,,so go to Ukraine and fight,,,not that you are a keyboard warrior
@@predraze_vrazevv9945 that's right, you go fight for mother russia an see how valued you are by your beautiful russia😂
@@ronin7531why going to Ukraine,my country IS full with orcs and their Family....No need to Go elsewhere,the war IS here
You can smell the desperation of the trollskis here
You need to specify which trolls you can smell
you gonna get it in your territory soon
Europeans understand better? But they are way behind in allowing Ukraine uses their weapons in Russia. Except the British who came out clearly. At least the USA came out unofficially and subtly allowing Ukraine to decide by itself to use American weapons inside Russia. No EU country has done that yet for this guy Europeans understand the situation better. Comical
There is no war between NATO and Russia because Ukraine is not a member of NATO. Ukraine cannot become a member while the war is ongoing. Even if the war ends, the approval of 32 Nato members is required for membership.
riiiight proxy wars are not a thing in your little world
@@rhetorical1488 Yeah Russia is familiar with proxy wars by itself too.
That is such a pathetic argument. Like Antifa does not exist and is only an idea. The only thing that Ukraine supplies in this war is human bodies. Everything else - everything - is Nato and a very few select allies.
@@rhetorical1488, just like your little green men were not a real thing in Crimea.
@@rhetorical1488 If Russia cannot even fully defeat Ukraine, how do they ever expect to stand a chance in the Baltics with NATO 😂😂😂😂😂
Nice segment!
The restrictions imposed on Ukraine have resulted in many lives lost.
Nuclear threats are empty threats? That's what an "expert: is saying. Yeah... we're doomed...
nothing but empty threats...
@@thegreatdane3627"Great" dane thinks to be a heroe... 🙃
So yeah it’s scary. But what can you do. If the west caves, that will teach the world that all that you need is the threat of a nuclear attack to get anything you want. That’s the thing with blackmail once you give in your going to be on the hook forever.
So the reason why expert believes is an empty threat is ..who in his right mind would like his country to turn into ashes, who will he govern wen it turns nuclear, Russia knows damn well that nuclear war will erase Russia so where will the people be to be governed???????
@@thegreatdane3627you’re “barking” 🐕 up the wrong tree 🌲
If we are all related, why do we kill each other?
Because we are not all related. It’s survival of the fittest.
Because some folks are more related than others.
All things are violent, from the cells in your body to the galaxies in the cosmos
Because we are a dumb species. There is this dumb misconception that without war then technology wouldn't advance.
Firstly, there would be more total available resources at our disposal. Wars destroy infrastructure that has to be replaced. It takes resources to build weapons and equipment. It takes resources to extract the needed resources to replace, repair, and rebuild.
Secondly, we would not lose as much knowledge from entire people being wiped out (having to relearn/rediscover it). Between the people that had specific knowledge dying and literally libraries being burned down, I'm surprised we made it this far.
Lastly, the people themselves. How many have died that had the capability and capacity to further our species? Doesn't matter if it's small contributions in their town (helping the poor) or are a genius and cures cancer. So long as you aren't hurting others, everyone has a place. We are stronger together than we ever are apart.
This American wants No Restrictions on where weapons are used in Russia.
George Dali we understand !! 😂😂😂
Man heard he'd be talking to DW and thought "time to break out the Kaiser 'stache.'"
2 patriot batteries with missles is over 2 billion USD. That's a big ask
and you just don't learn how to operate it overnight i was a army 14t patriot launcher operator my school was 14 week and thats just one part of the patriot system
There is a bully at the door , let Ukraine push back !
Ukrain should not limit themselves the way Russia attacking them Ukrain should use the same tactics.
My experience in the MidEast and Afghanistan: The absolute last thing mothers want is for their side to ‘hit the enemy’. Unlike in the movies, the stronger enemy can hit back ten times harder. Latest example is Gaza,. People are gung ho until they face reality of the moment when their families are in imminent danger.
Gaza is a poor example!
@@4411825 You mean Germany will become a better one ...
hmm. Russian moms seem to be ok with it
Scholz is such a wimp. Disgraceful.
They’re biggest problem is air defence…this is so crazy
Ukraine should get its nuclear weapons back. Russia has not adhered to the non-aggression pact.
All of western arms use aginest russia.
God bless Ukraine !
Then how are ukraine striking oil refineries and airfields with restrictions?
Ukrainian made weapons. No one has said they can’t attack inside Russia…many nations simply didn’t want the weapons they sent Ukraine to be used inside of Russia. I think the EU is now coming to terms with the fact that if they don’t step up and send a message to ol’ Poot…then NATO may be attacked next. This is all a copy and paste job from WWII….and poor Ukraine gets screwed again.
George Barros, we don't need your opinion about how you feel about this situation. Just give us the facts.
You cannot fight a war with gloves on, you need to go all out to achieve an objective!
1:49 don’t worry boys. Keep on rocking.
❤❤❤Viva Ukraine ❤😊
The summer of weaponization is looming, this is the decisive point of tempo which will set the next winter stance
We Europeans must get over our fear of a Russian collapse.
exactly
I hear Ukraine is talking volunteer, don't let fear stop you
@@Meeko2689👏👏
There is no point in fearing the impossible.
Ha Ha ha ha! Koja Evropa to je Američka kolonija! Amerikanci su postavili "predsjednike" u Evropi koje drže na povodcu i komanduju! Na globalu Evropa je postala nebitna! Novi Svjetski poredak je u toku glavnu riječ vode Rusija i Kina kao najveće vojne i ekonomske sile! Amerikanci su prezaduženi, nemaju vojsku i oni su u slobodnom padu ali grčevito se bore da ostanu na površini!!!!!
What could go wrong.
If Europeans understood it better, they wouldn't have cut military spending & downsized their military for decades.
Leopards, F16 and the like are now not so useful, we were told they are game changers. These guys know how to fight by mouth.
They are game changers. But they were given really small amounts of them. I think they only got half the tanks they wanted.
@@williamwayne4043 I believe 'lEoPaRd' has been displayed in Moscow, guess russian destroyed them with magical shaval 🤣
@@williamwayne4043 They are game changer agains Iraq but not against Russia.
@@rs1357learn English if you're going to try and troll
LOL!
3:47 lmfao! You bring a guy on looking like that, all credibility is instantly gone. Good job😂🤣😂
This smells of PANIC!
If you're panicking no need to project that onto others
Why have the EU members of NATO not sat down and coordinate the short term and long term supply of armaments. They must have a geographic diversity in their supply and the production capacity to manufacture their requirements in the event of a war. It appears to me that EU is like the United Nations - lots of talk without any action or results.
If Russia is saying the same thing, all of our pants would be wet.
Either that or all of our money would be going into a war economy like what's happening in Russia, and their pants would be wet
"But my lord there is no such force." " But there is! They are called Ukrainians"
So the moustache dude was giving NAFO the cope news for the last 2 years?
NAFO?
NAFO?
Russia better get ready because it’s going to be like Freddy Mercury’s We will rock you”!
(7:20) If the US and the Allies, understand that Putin does nothing more than nuclear saber-rattling....then what are we waiting for? The bureaucratic rhetoric is getting old. Did we learn nothing from the 1930s?
that guy with the funny facial hair, my goodness, i cannot concentrate on his statement without lol!
they didn't accept mig-29 from romania (less 4000 hours of flight )
MiGs are Russian tech. Altho I would personally accept, i can kinda see a few reasons for declining. I'm not saying it's the right decision, I'm just saying 😅
shame on putler
Returns rise and soldiers fall 😪
shame on russia
salvador dali is on it 4:19
are those military targets ukraine attacks or just terrorattacks?
It's just terror attacks... They want to put fear in the hearts of ordinary Russian citizens
Both.
They are military targets. You are confused with Russia.
Even if they are they'd totally be justified. Russia has been doing it the entire WAR
@@natalieturko4808 ok.
Great to have Salvador Dali on the show!
Ukraine must try to analyze the situation... Russia wants them to put all it's reserves and armaments,, because Russia wants to finish right in Donetsk and Kharkov area... Zaporozhye and Kherson... Ukraine is now on its checkmate move...
The claim of Ukraine --
In return of lost lands to Russia.
idk, it seems to me some of DW's reporting is a bit "off".. "Russia is attacking Kharkiv to create a buffer zone, to push Ukrainian artillery further"..? not sure how that would help Russia in any way when Ukrainian drones are bombing oil refineries over a thousand kilometers inside Russia.. I mean Russia could do everyone a favor and create a "special" buffer zone from European half of its own territory, resettling all Russians on the Asian side.. that would create all the "buffer zone" Russia could ever dream off.. AND it would no longer need Ukrainian territory to "defend against NATO" 🙂
The reason why Russia attacked is not delay of weapon deliveries. Ukraine spent a lot of our taxpayer money for fortifications, but the money was laundered by Ukraine's high officials and shell companies, which took the money despite not building the fortifications they were paid to build.
Ok, source? If the source is "trust me, I'm a professional anonymous CZcams whoever" just be open with it, don't be shy.
@@Cloud-dq1mr BBC: Ukraine's security service says it has uncovered corruption in an arms purchase by the military worth about $40m (£31m). The SBU said five senior people in the defence ministry and at an arms supplier were being investigated. It said the defence officials signed a contract for 100,000 mortar shells in August 2022.
@@Cloud-dq1mr Yahoo news: According to Mezha's findings based on open-source data, contracts were signed with companies that appear to be fictitious. Tens of millions of hryvnias were transferred to a private entrepreneur whose owner, Ihor Chaus, has a criminal record for stealing a bottle of whiskey from a supermarket and was sentenced to 100 hours of community service, said the anti-graft activist.
A sign of Taurus?
Sad
Making Putin want a deeper buffer zone. Zelensky’s logic.
Ukraine should have mobilized new troops months ago
Shame on the Republicans for not supporting another Democracy. As an American I apologize to all of Ukraine for their treachery and willingness to help Putin. Long may Ukraine be strong. When you fall, NATO has failed! 🌹❣️🇺🇦
What happened to Ukraine's "bio weapons"? Release the mosquitoes!
No kidding! How did you wake up after 2 years and 3 months. Is it not a shame for you all. How many mistake and how many time in history needs to be repeated those mistakes to dam learn from them.
Suppose things gets worse for Ukraine,even with this latest supplies from the US and the EEU.What could be the end result if Ukraine begin striking military targets inside Russia?
Do we expect the situation to drive this world to a better ending of this war?
Can someone help me understand this.
moustache could win any war
Hey DW, Don't expect Germany to even supply any long range munitions like the Taurus Cruise missile. Imagine Scholz agreeing to allow anything supplied to be used against Russian land assets. Maybe DW should stay clear about the US allowing weapons to hit Russian sites, when Scholz refuses to send anything long range AT All.
Guy is wrong. His mustache is only thing correct here.
Russia is allowed to destroy Ukraine but Ukraine isn't allowed to destroy Russia. China is allowed to occupy South-East Asian waters but those nations in the region weren't allowed to act with armed response. Russia & China should be forced to follow the rule of law based on the UN Charter & UN Law of Seas. We just have to apply common sense here
Next thay well be asking the American people to go
Ukraine short of manpower, not weapons 😂
What's the good of an aid package if there's no left to utilise it?
Ukraine men are lhaving fun in western countries like a girl. I cannot understand why do Ukrainian men between the ages of 20 and 25 not have to join the army and can live and have fun in other countries like girls?
@@unsalbulentbecause girls just want to have fun?
This war is now between Russia and Natto.
Yes, Natto ... 😂
It always was.
Since 2004.
Blinken is a great salesman for the arms manufacturers
That moustache is ridiculous. Can't take him seriously
Lets be honest, we both know you look way more funny than him. Just judging from your silly comment.
Ukraine has every right to use the weapons in to Russia. Vladimir Putin is using irans and north Korea weapons.
To say trump is like putin is totally wrong and not really something you would expect from expert .
Оккупированные народы Европы не голосовали за помощь Украине, а деньги выгребают из жителей Европы.
5:50 Even taking time out in the middle of fighting a desperate war to help an elderly lady with her groceries. They are true heroes, the Ukrainian soldiers. Sacrificing their lifes and wellbeing on the frontline to save their country and still have the will to act as the pillars of society in a time when such pillars are the difference between civil society collapsing or not.
The propoganda is rotting your brain.
Big news for DW
Big news for ruSSia,
So, Russia can use Iranian and North Korean weappns to hit civilian targets in Ukraine, but Ukraine can't use foreign aid to hit military targets in Russia? Make it make sense.
Iran and NK are out of range of Ukrainian strikes, and NATo bases aren’t for Russia. Should be fairly simple to understand…
to late...
If everything has changed now, and NATO weapons can hit targets on Russian territory, then why can’t Russian weapons hit targets on NATO territory?
russia could do that, but it would be a declaration of war against NATO...
@@thegreatdane3627 No, it won't, because this is only a mirror answer. If you follow your logic, then NATO has already declared war on Russia, lifting the ban on attacks on Russian territory. NATO is not capable of defeating Russia on its territory.
@@Jimmy1972no - because you are talking about RUSSIANS using Russian weapons on NATO territory. NATO is giving western weapons to UKRAINE to use (hypothetically) on Russian territory. So the comparable inverse scenario would be Russia giving their weapons to some third country to use on NATO territory. Which would probably result in that third country being annihilated but not result in NATO declaring war on Russia.
Alternatively, if Russia did directly attack a NATO country - then yes, NATO would declare war on it. This is not that hard to understand, and it makes me think you are arguing in bad faith.
@@Jimmy1972 go on and do it then.
@@LegatusGaius Scholz did not give Ukraine the Taurus because a missile strike on Russian territory would be a declaration of war, and he is right. If NATO declared war on Russia, then we must fight.
America needs to understand if we do not do what it takes to save ukriane Russia will want more and it’s very obvious it’s important that are government keeps sending them the aid would not like Russia any closer to NATO
Why did you surrendered nukes....u never disarm urself
Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh (2024, May 17): "American weapons provided by the US as part of military aid are intended for use within Ukrainian territory. The US has not changed its position on the use of the weapons it provides to Ukraine."
Makes sense, bc US always said they want Russia only to be seriously weakened (and not defended). Collapse of Russia is not in US interest bc that would automatically strengthen China. And they neither want WW3. Obviously Blinken was once again, similarly as all his doings in Israel, "confused"...
good thing this only applies to US supplied weapons then
@@icu17siberiaWhy? Do you think Pentagon can speak for all NATO countries ? 🙃
@eddastrohmayer251 Of course the Pentagon is the master of NATO!!!! The Pentagon decides to which country and what kind of weapons it should send and how many it should send, it's obvious!!!!