@@alessiogiovannoli1913 Also important to remember that the Monaco GP is driven on a track surface that is, for the majority of the year, used as public roads. You can see an obvious difference with regards to the quality of the road surface between different years, especially after repavement. On top of that, there has been alterations to the layout of the track, which probably includes many subtle ones that would be very difficult to spot!
What's definitely not "Sublime stuff"; is hearing the engine noise of a proper racecar, gradually deteriorating into something that sounds more like a lawnmower than an F1 car...
Ricciardo 2016 too! If you watch his pole lap you'd think he'll crash but he didn't. His whole lap had so many turns where he was inches away from the side of the wall..
Of all the corners of all the tracks you've picked one of the best places to see the evolution of Formula 1 cars over the years with the high speed direction changes with precision. Awesome video
That's because the camera is basically stationary, which gives you a lot of context in how the cars actually move in space I get that moving cameras make it easier to follow the action, but I wish there were more stationary shots in motorsport
The only thing I have against the sound thing is that it only serves to entertain. No F1 team is going to go backwards in engine tech just to achieve a certain sound. It's just not ethical
@@jacobhanekamp2534 it's not about tech, it's about regulations forcing teams to use smaller, slower revving engines. In 2014 they changed it from 2.4L 19,000 RPM to 1.6L 15,000 RPM. They also allowed turbochargers, which change the sound too.
Qualifying times may be different, but the fastest lap in 2004 is a 1:14 and the fastest lap in 2019 was a 1:14 too, not much of a difference, the track is also slightly shorter today. If you want to see a speed difference check the 2003 Monza GP Vs the 2023 Monza GP, fastest lap of 2003 1:21 Michael Schumacher, fastest lap 2023 1:25 Gasly.
They weren't sublime, they were slow. It may look "flashy" but F1 cars aren't designed to go sideways. It's not rally! It may have worked out in the 80s and earlier when they had very little downforce but in the more modern era it is just shows the driver lacks control and speed.
@@123manny321 You try doing it then if it's so easy, to be able to get a fairly modern aerodynamic car and control a slide when you're right on the edge of speed is nothing short of sensational in my view.
@@Ghost_Lap tf are you talking about? All I said is it wasn't sublime, it was slow. The sublime line is the railed line, not the sliding one. Just goes to show how much you don't know. You're one of those "it looks flashy so it must be good" kinda person.
@@123manny321 And of course you know it all right? You've actually driven one of those things at the highest level of competition right? No, we're both just arm chair experts, it's just that I can recognize something amazing when I see it.
@@Ghost_Lap I mean it does look cool no arguments but the guy is right, less sliding = more speed, Kubica and Kimi were probably the quickest by far in those clips.
Dam, I really miss those V10s, and V8s too. That sound, the small cars, the visually light weight nature of them dancing around. I wish we could bring them back.
It's just not ethical, it's a massive step back for a sport all about innovation and discovering new technology. No team is going to go backwards and sacrifice seconds a lap for a sound.
@@jacobhanekamp2534 to be fair with some modern aero and slicks and what not the older cars would be quicker. The power to weight ratio plus just weight for cornering would give them a good advantage. The old R25 was pretty close to pace back when Alonso drove in 2020.
@@jacobhanekamp2534 its not about the sound its part of the show. You want to go watch a car race and you want to see and hear the race show. ignoring sound its like ignoring an important aspect that gives that wow factor F1 always had
@@Drewbyy but there's still safety equipment and more reasons about the old engines are just not that good (reliability: they would disintegrate after 3 races), so the cars would be heavier nonetheless
The TV doesn't do these machines justice. When you see them live on track it's unbelievable how quick they corner and how late they brake. The skill level it takes to drive these F1 cars is frightening.
I still don't get the appeal of those extremely high reving sounds I mean, I guess compared to current cars they sound more impressive, but as far as engine sounds go, they're far far from my favourite
@@sanny8716 I guess it's different folks different strokes but those V10 and V12s are what got me hooked to F1. It sounds so mean like a racecar should! In my opinion anyway.
@@DillandShaj See, that's what I mean. I don't really understand how people can perceive it as mean or aggressive. A lot of people describe it as "roar" but to me it just sounds like very loud mosquitoes. Compare to something like a Mazda 787B or Group B cars, now that's some angry sounding race cars.
@@sanny8716 Yeah those cars sound epic! Maybe it's just how people perceive it. I loved the downshifts of F1 cars when they had the double diffuser as well.
@@DillandShaj Yeah, I don't know, maybe it's just me. It is a nostalgic sound, I remember seeing F1 races on TV as a kid, back when the name Schumacher was synonymous with a quick racing driver. Maybe I'm too used to the sound to hear it as something extraordinary?
This illustrates just how much more exciting the cars were when they were smaller, had less tyre, and were high revving NA machines. So much more dynamic and interesting to watch.
Presumably (without looking in to it), it's some of the AI upscaled stuff Cause the original would have been like DVD quality back then (640x480 ?) But someone spent very many hours upscaling it to ~1080p, which is pretty neat
@@Stevo_1998 From 2003 the F1 broadcast was in 1080i, whether individual TV channels could broadcast it or not was another story, but that was the highest resolution Bernie made available. I don't know exactly when it went from 1080i to 1080p (some time around 2008-10) and it went up to 2160p (4k) for 2017.
@@fix0the0spade fr fr? Cause someone sent me a clip from F1 TV Pro or whatever (it was something they captured) from ~2004 iirc and it looked like standard broadcast quality (aka, DVD lol) Unless F1TV just doesn't show old races at the 1080i quality some channels got, then idk lol
@@Stevo_1998 well theres an entire process, first of all starting with what you filmed the footage on, in 2004 a 480p camera, would've been completely normal, a 720p would've been extremely high end, and only found by bigger broadcasting companies and w.e, and then 1080p which at the time would've been considered revolutionary, and at this point, still experimental, considering stable 1080p resolution wasn't until around 2009. then after that processing of said video, which depending on the software, can greatly hamper the image, after that, the process of sending it out around the world, which in 2004 would've been done through cable, which if you're too young to remember, cable was horrible, not as bad as antennas, but cable had its fair share of moments, usually the second it started to rain, you were out for the next 3 hours.
I know the cars have gotten wider over the years, but this video does a really good job of showing it. Especially how nimble the early 2000's cars were
yeah it's due to regulation changes, early it was about making street narrow cars, but there was the dirty air issue that they tried to solve with making the cars wider to have more contact with the air coming from behind another car (it made the problem worse), but then they reached the current cars that are supposed to give clean air to the other for more competition. The size is probably heritage of the past regulations but we have to take in consideration the safety equipment, because the cars are heavy because of them too
Montoya's Monza record from 2004 stood until 2018...the V10s were ridiculous. About as much power and they only weighed 605kg (they weigh 900kg+ today). Schumacher's Monaco lap from 2004 wasn't beaten until 2016 and the circuit was shortened a tiny bit in 2015 with Tabac reprofiled so it's a faster circuit now.
For me it's one of the few images that give a real speed sensation in F1, seen from television: the linked pool corners in Monaco. It's the problem that circuits have, not only in F1, in any competition that is held on tracks. Which is problem that I see in the circuits? For obvious safety reasons, traced cannot have obstacles near the track, which is what visually tells you how fast they are going, and then there's distance (very long) at which the images are taken, which also greatly influences that missed speed sensation, and going to circuit yourself as a spectator should not be spectacular enough either, unless you are in heavy braking areas, and always in lateral views. For me the greatest feeling is to see the World Rally Championship live, on road border (dangerous too, everything must be said, but with easy solution, stay in security zones, established by organizers). I always shall remember, for example, some images that are on youtube of Rally of Catalonia in 2019 of a of linked corners that are made practically at full throttle where the real speed at which they go is appreciated and it's hair-raising to see how fast they go on a mountain road (and filmed, not seen live). And all this for free (usually) without having to pay. Another aspect to consider in rallies is driftings. Another example, in Rally Portugal, as in other rallies, there are dirt stages with small pieces of asphalt where seeing them drift with wheels and dirt suspensions is a spectacle worth telling the grandchildren. On border of road
it so sad the contrast between 2005 and 2006 and then again between 2013 and 2014. it goes from roaring high pitched screams and blown diffusers into the camera's mic capturing the sound of the wind going over the cars.
Totally agree. That chicane shot really shows the speed and the edge drivers deal with in Monaco for the entire lap. Curiously, the slowest circuit on the calendar is the one that demonstrates the speed the best. For instance; onboard footage of Monaco gives us the notion of speed a lot more than onboard shots of Monza, even though the difference in speed is enormous. It's like wingsuit proximity flying that is infinitely more dramatic than when pilots fly away from the mountain.
They should create a classic F1 category. It would feature cars from 2000 to 2006 with V10s so people who like F1 that way could watch it and people who likes vaccum cleaners could watch modern F1 And everybody is happy.
What is crazy is that the 2003 cars were so much quicker than they are today. The fastest lap at Monza in 2003 is a whole 5 seconds faster than last years.
Me meanwhile looking at the evolution of the position graphics on the corner... The most nostalgic graphic style for me is 2010-2013. Those were the races I usted to watch as a kid
like many people i'm not a fan of the v6t, but, i think we can all agree about the 2016 ricciardo's red bull sound, coming a bit like a rocket with the sound of the turbo
Yes I try to find some footages but it's harder than Monaco. There is not one camera angle that come back each year like here. When you talk about eau rouge which camera angle do you think about ? (before the corner or after ?)
@@KingFishF1 before, when you can see the cars 'climbing' the corner. such a shame that we don't have a traditional angle like Monaco has, they even got more than one! anyways, thanks for your research and hope to see more great videos from you
I did some research: Temperature is a factor that I'm not considering, but I compared the FP2 times for both Spain and Monaco between this year and last. 2022 cars were 1.5 seconds slower in Spain, but only 1 second slower in Monaco. I'm surprised that Monaco has the closer gap, personally.
A bunch of things have changed over the years. Obviously the sound dropped in 2014. But the sense of speed is lower with modern camera stabilization and higher resolution. I also think that the tires were incredibly sticky in the 2000s; I'm happy to be corrected.
This corner combo with camera angle surpremly shows the speed and more so, control improvement of the cars over the last two decades. Sublime stuff.
Slick tyres
@@alessiogiovannoli1913 Also important to remember that the Monaco GP is driven on a track surface that is, for the majority of the year, used as public roads. You can see an obvious difference with regards to the quality of the road surface between different years, especially after repavement. On top of that, there has been alterations to the layout of the track, which probably includes many subtle ones that would be very difficult to spot!
What's definitely not "Sublime stuff"; is hearing the engine noise of a proper racecar, gradually deteriorating into something that sounds more like a lawnmower than an F1 car...
@@TecraX2 Perfect statement!
Id actually say the v10s looked the fastest going through, despite not being on slicks. Imagine how much faster they'd be on modern tires
Lewis 2007 and Seb 2011 looked crazy.
Ricciardo 2016 too! If you watch his pole lap you'd think he'll crash but he didn't. His whole lap had so many turns where he was inches away from the side of the wall..
Crazy but slow. The man to watch is kubica. Unbelievable speed and dangerous line that he pulled off
Fernando in 2007 as well
Right
Those felt slow
0:21 that rotation was scary
He was listening to that eurobeat
@@omaroma6081 takumi hamilton
@@infinity-yi1yj Hamilton Fujiwara
@@asharfirdaus4147 *deja vu by Dave Rodgers (not Olivia Rodrigo cuz she bad) in the background**
slip angle
The most noticeable thing is how great the engines sounded before 2014.
🥱
Eh, not really. I always found those high pitched engines annoying more than enjoyable.
@@shogun2215 well that's an opinion, but an unpopular one :D nothing beats the V12 or V10 back in the days..
@@shogun2215 🤡
@@shogun2215 Tf...here u can clearly see an f1 fan who's not a car guy 🤣🤣
Of all the corners of all the tracks you've picked one of the best places to see the evolution of Formula 1 cars over the years with the high speed direction changes with precision. Awesome video
Thanks, to be honest with you Im mad because a lot of people steal my video. Someone even made nearly 2 million views with the exact same footage…
@@KingFishF1 are you serious?
That is sad that someone does that
is your channel monetized?
i get it, even i want to make a million views to retire confortably for the rest of my life.
@@11hitmanDagenius a million views on a single video might pay for a meal
@@KingFishF1 isnt it possible to copyright claim the videos?
That's because the camera is basically stationary, which gives you a lot of context in how the cars actually move in space
I get that moving cameras make it easier to follow the action, but I wish there were more stationary shots in motorsport
We need more stationary cameras
agreed
You really get to see what modern Formula 1 is missing, and I know everyone says it every 2 seconds, but the sound makes such a big difference.
no
@@lucasng4712 yea
The only thing I have against the sound thing is that it only serves to entertain. No F1 team is going to go backwards in engine tech just to achieve a certain sound. It's just not ethical
@@jacobhanekamp2534 it's not about tech, it's about regulations forcing teams to use smaller, slower revving engines. In 2014 they changed it from 2.4L 19,000 RPM to 1.6L 15,000 RPM. They also allowed turbochargers, which change the sound too.
I think weight and size is a bigger issue.
0:45 The Moment you Realise F1 Now Sounds like a Vacuum Cleaner
The 2014 cars did sound awful but the 2019-2021 sound pretty good imo
Not as good as the V8s but close enough
MGU-H kicked in yo
2014 was shocking. Only got better since then though
Bad microphone placement also affected the sound, thankfully from 2015 onwards they nailed it
No F1 video without the obligatory crying kid
That 2010 Renault taking the corner is just something different
Yeah, Kubica really knew how to give a 100% out of a car that was supposed to "only" score points!
Especially when Kubica is behind the wheel
@@QF_Dan72 hell yeah
Thats the power of GIGAKUBICA™️
Great livery too!
its crazy how fast the 2019 cars were. every car was doing 57-52s on that sector. the 2019 car did 51.3
The W11 would be insane here.
qualifying speeds have improved a lot, but a regular race pace hasn’t
@@darchandarchan7036 100 kg of fuel onboard will do that
Qualifying times may be different, but the fastest lap in 2004 is a 1:14 and the fastest lap in 2019 was a 1:14 too, not much of a difference, the track is also slightly shorter today. If you want to see a speed difference check the 2003 Monza GP Vs the 2023 Monza GP, fastest lap of 2003 1:21 Michael Schumacher, fastest lap 2023 1:25 Gasly.
They changed Talbec in 2015 and reprofiled the pool.
Lewis 2007 and Seb 2011 were sublime, right on the edge👏👏
They weren't sublime, they were slow. It may look "flashy" but F1 cars aren't designed to go sideways. It's not rally!
It may have worked out in the 80s and earlier when they had very little downforce but in the more modern era it is just shows the driver lacks control and speed.
@@123manny321 You try doing it then if it's so easy, to be able to get a fairly modern aerodynamic car and control a slide when you're right on the edge of speed is nothing short of sensational in my view.
@@Ghost_Lap tf are you talking about? All I said is it wasn't sublime, it was slow. The sublime line is the railed line, not the sliding one. Just goes to show how much you don't know. You're one of those "it looks flashy so it must be good" kinda person.
@@123manny321 And of course you know it all right? You've actually driven one of those things at the highest level of competition right? No, we're both just arm chair experts, it's just that I can recognize something amazing when I see it.
@@Ghost_Lap I mean it does look cool no arguments but the guy is right, less sliding = more speed, Kubica and Kimi were probably the quickest by far in those clips.
Gotta love how that Nissan Patrol has always been a constant mainstay there throughout all these years
😂
HAHAHA I DIDN'T EVEN NOTICE
V10s just sounded menacing. Fisi bouncing through although not the fastest was just awesome.
finally someone who has a nice, expressive and respectful opinion that doesn't take crap on V6s
That noise switch from 0:42 to 0:46 😔😔😔
its easy the forget how much better they were unless directly compared like this. mind blowingly bad sound.
A disgrace.
And size growth every year. They wont fit anymore in 2030 if it continues.
@@mionellessi3086 2022 cars are slightly smaller. i dearly hope this trend continues from now on. leave the era of mammoth cars in the past please.
@@test-tl8dt They are as big as they were in 2021, but even heavier.
The 2010 Kubica looked fast on that one
Yes, R30 was brilliant car and Kubica in Monaco was a goat in every occasion
Dam, I really miss those V10s, and V8s too. That sound, the small cars, the visually light weight nature of them dancing around. I wish we could bring them back.
It's just not ethical, it's a massive step back for a sport all about innovation and discovering new technology. No team is going to go backwards and sacrifice seconds a lap for a sound.
@@jacobhanekamp2534 to be fair with some modern aero and slicks and what not the older cars would be quicker. The power to weight ratio plus just weight for cornering would give them a good advantage. The old R25 was pretty close to pace back when Alonso drove in 2020.
@@jacobhanekamp2534 "all about innovation and discovering new technology" Yet they cant even drive on a wet track.
@@jacobhanekamp2534 its not about the sound its part of the show. You want to go watch a car race and you want to see and hear the race show.
ignoring sound its like ignoring an important aspect that gives that wow factor F1 always had
@@Drewbyy but there's still safety equipment and more reasons about the old engines are just not that good (reliability: they would disintegrate after 3 races), so the cars would be heavier nonetheless
Love him or hate him, Lewis Hamilton is honestly a joy to watch if you’re a fan of Motorsport. 0:21 is incredible.
Yeah, exceptional commitment and car control!
I kinda miss this Hamilton, he was much more entertaining back then, as well as more likable (imo).
2019 too
Hamilton at McLaren, hate his Merc version
@@dragivasilev3636 blink and you'll miss it
A little bit of opposite lock going into that corner is actually crazy at those speeds. Thats as much of a banzai corner as youll ever see
The TV doesn't do these machines justice. When you see them live on track it's unbelievable how quick they corner and how late they brake. The skill level it takes to drive these F1 cars is frightening.
Any normal person trying to do once what these guys do 100 times a weekend would end terribly, the skill and precision is insane.
Man the cars sound soooooooooooo good before the hybrid era
I still don't get the appeal of those extremely high reving sounds
I mean, I guess compared to current cars they sound more impressive, but as far as engine sounds go, they're far far from my favourite
@@sanny8716 I guess it's different folks different strokes but those V10 and V12s are what got me hooked to F1. It sounds so mean like a racecar should! In my opinion anyway.
@@DillandShaj See, that's what I mean. I don't really understand how people can perceive it as mean or aggressive.
A lot of people describe it as "roar" but to me it just sounds like very loud mosquitoes.
Compare to something like a Mazda 787B or Group B cars, now that's some angry sounding race cars.
@@sanny8716 Yeah those cars sound epic! Maybe it's just how people perceive it. I loved the downshifts of F1 cars when they had the double diffuser as well.
@@DillandShaj Yeah, I don't know, maybe it's just me.
It is a nostalgic sound, I remember seeing F1 races on TV as a kid, back when the name Schumacher was synonymous with a quick racing driver.
Maybe I'm too used to the sound to hear it as something extraordinary?
This illustrates just how much more exciting the cars were when they were smaller, had less tyre, and were high revving NA machines. So much more dynamic and interesting to watch.
the 2003 footage is high quality, it almost looked like it was taken just yesterday.
Presumably (without looking in to it), it's some of the AI upscaled stuff
Cause the original would have been like DVD quality back then (640x480 ?)
But someone spent very many hours upscaling it to ~1080p, which is pretty neat
@@Stevo_1998 From 2003 the F1 broadcast was in 1080i, whether individual TV channels could broadcast it or not was another story, but that was the highest resolution Bernie made available. I don't know exactly when it went from 1080i to 1080p (some time around 2008-10) and it went up to 2160p (4k) for 2017.
@@fix0the0spade fr fr?
Cause someone sent me a clip from F1 TV Pro or whatever (it was something they captured) from ~2004 iirc and it looked like standard broadcast quality (aka, DVD lol)
Unless F1TV just doesn't show old races at the 1080i quality some channels got, then idk lol
@@Stevo_1998 well theres an entire process, first of all starting with what you filmed the footage on, in 2004 a 480p camera, would've been completely normal, a 720p would've been extremely high end, and only found by bigger broadcasting companies and w.e, and then 1080p which at the time would've been considered revolutionary, and at this point, still experimental, considering stable 1080p resolution wasn't until around 2009.
then after that processing of said video, which depending on the software, can greatly hamper the image, after that, the process of sending it out around the world, which in 2004 would've been done through cable, which if you're too young to remember, cable was horrible, not as bad as antennas, but cable had its fair share of moments, usually the second it started to rain, you were out for the next 3 hours.
@@devonesq.7533 1080p and higher existed in the 90's
I know the cars have gotten wider over the years, but this video does a really good job of showing it. Especially how nimble the early 2000's cars were
yeah it's due to regulation changes, early it was about making street narrow cars, but there was the dirty air issue that they tried to solve with making the cars wider to have more contact with the air coming from behind another car (it made the problem worse), but then they reached the current cars that are supposed to give clean air to the other for more competition. The size is probably heritage of the past regulations but we have to take in consideration the safety equipment, because the cars are heavy because of them too
Watching the first clip and last brings tears to my eyes ...
We miss the iconic sound of F1
Lewis Drifting and Fisi bouncing with that v10 🔥
Lewis never drove a v10
@@moi2036 i was referring to the drifting only
@@jason14444 my bad
@@moi2036 all good, should be an exciting quali
@@moi2036 I think he has driven v10 cars while testing for McLaren
0:05 The dust coming up behind Ralf's Williams looks so cool, reminds me of a vapor cone around a jet fighter
that pace has improved season by season
Especially Lewis 2008
2009 regs onwards
@@alsa4real u mean 2007
Montoya's Monza record from 2004 stood until 2018...the V10s were ridiculous. About as much power and they only weighed 605kg (they weigh 900kg+ today). Schumacher's Monaco lap from 2004 wasn't beaten until 2016 and the circuit was shortened a tiny bit in 2015 with Tabac reprofiled so it's a faster circuit now.
The older cars were a lot quicker, if you look at the 2003 Monza GP fastest lap it's a 1:20, 2023, 1:25.
if only the current cars sounded like what they had in 2004.
2014...what a disaster
For me it's one of the few images that give a real speed sensation in F1, seen from television: the linked pool corners in Monaco.
It's the problem that circuits have, not only in F1, in any competition that is held on tracks.
Which is problem that I see in the circuits?
For obvious safety reasons, traced cannot have obstacles near the track, which is what visually tells you how fast they are going, and then there's distance (very long) at which the images are taken, which also greatly influences that missed speed sensation, and going to circuit yourself as a spectator should not be spectacular enough either, unless you are in heavy braking areas, and always in lateral views.
For me the greatest feeling is to see the World Rally Championship live, on road border (dangerous too, everything must be said, but with easy solution, stay in security zones, established by organizers).
I always shall remember, for example, some images that are on youtube of Rally of Catalonia in 2019 of a of linked corners that are made practically at full throttle where the real speed at which they go is appreciated and it's hair-raising to see how fast they go on a mountain road (and filmed, not seen live). And all this for free (usually) without having to pay.
Another aspect to consider in rallies is driftings. Another example, in Rally Portugal, as in other rallies, there are dirt stages with small pieces of asphalt where seeing them drift with wheels and dirt suspensions is a spectacle worth telling the grandchildren.
On border of road
you can see that with every year the video quality is getting better
and the engine sounds getting worse
Bro I want to see old F1 races again
Man, beautiful engine notes all the way up until 2014.
Those engines tho 😩😩 And that Kubica lap 🥲🥲
That switch to the hybrid engines killed me.
Both Hamilton ones are absolutely crazy.
You can feel the G's from those camera angles. Never gets old seeing these cars appearing to be glued to the pavement .
That stability.. Amazing
I miss that V10/8 sound soooo much 🥺
It is now an end of an era (2002-2022) as this year (2023) has completely different camera angles as Formula 1 has taken over Tele Monaco.
it so sad the contrast between 2005 and 2006 and then again between 2013 and 2014. it goes from roaring high pitched screams and blown diffusers into the camera's mic capturing the sound of the wind going over the cars.
That speed and control lmao Pure madness!!!
Everything was good until the vacuum cleaners came...
Vacuum cleaners that make 1000HP. I'm completely fine with that.
Look at the difference between 2014 and 2015
2014 was specially awful
@@kingayvazand still slower than the V8s before them
that 2019, what the hell, so quick!
Totally agree. That chicane shot really shows the speed and the edge drivers deal with in Monaco for the entire lap. Curiously, the slowest circuit on the calendar is the one that demonstrates the speed the best. For instance; onboard footage of Monaco gives us the notion of speed a lot more than onboard shots of Monza, even though the difference in speed is enormous. It's like wingsuit proximity flying that is infinitely more dramatic than when pilots fly away from the mountain.
like slotcars...nailed to the asphalt...unbelievable
The sudden silence from 2014 on ☹️ miss the good old days when F1 cars were so loud, they could make your organs implode just driving by
Not only cars sounded better before 2013, they also more nimble and quick looking
Exactly 👌
Yes!! Great take with a great video, but as I see it, I also get reminded how much cooler the cars looked and sounded before 2016/17 and onwards
Yes!! I've been looking for a montage of nothing but these shots for YEARS now, but nothing was ever uploaded to CZcams. Thank you!!!
That Nissan patrol in the back has a better life than me
That this sport does not get boring to many people boggles my mind sometimes.
The level of concentration an F1 driver must have is out of this world.
The speed is crazy
Brilliant video! It's such a great camera angle. Maybe not for all out speed but it's the change in direction that's mind boggling!
When the wall was moved foward, right behind the entry kerb, it ruined some of the joy of this corner!!
the speed in 2019 was mad
2017 onwards is just wow
You can notice the grip difference of the tyres when they went from grooved to slicks, imagine the V10 cars with modern slicks
And that's a whole pool width they are avoiding.
It really put into perspective how batshit crazy fast these cars are.
Props to the camera operator and the zoom out skills.
Best F1 camera takes are these WITHOUT zooming in and out. If you keep the finger off the zoom button, you get a sense of the speed of these beasts.
For some reason, partway through watching this, my brain decided that all the F1 cars are tiny and remote-controlled, and I can't unsee it.
They should create a classic F1 category.
It would feature cars from 2000 to 2006 with V10s so people who like F1 that way could watch it and people who likes vaccum cleaners could watch modern F1
And everybody is happy.
The sound is amazing. That scream!!
After 2013 F1 was told to, "keep the noise down"
That 2010 clip with kubica was FAST dayum, 2010 and 2019 looked the best imo
What is crazy is that the 2003 cars were so much quicker than they are today. The fastest lap at Monza in 2003 is a whole 5 seconds faster than last years.
I always cry a little when I hear the difference between real engines and tuned leafblowers
2014 sounds like someone muted their audio
The first 35 seconds are pure love, after that, it sounds like my mum's hoover waking me up...
Those V10 era ones look 1000% faster than what we see nowadays on TV
0:09 holy shit that sounds cool
the image quality of 2003 is impressive
You can tell how heavy and less alive the hybrid cars look
So true. The older cars were so much smaller and lighter. I like how they were twitchy, like you could turn them on a dime.
@@nickporter574 I think the 2026 regulations are taking a step back in that aspect, they want to make the cars smaller and lighter again
Me meanwhile looking at the evolution of the position graphics on the corner...
The most nostalgic graphic style for me is 2010-2013. Those were the races I usted to watch as a kid
shoutout to Johnnie Walker for the consistency in ad-space over the years
like many people i'm not a fan of the v6t, but, i think we can all agree about the 2016 ricciardo's red bull sound, coming a bit like a rocket with the sound of the turbo
The cars look so much more stable now than they did a bit more than a decade ago...
seing that angle on alonso's renault in yellow and blue omg it aged so well and i am so nostalgic
Monaco and Belgium, au Rouge corner is also really sick when they use the camera they build in the curb
The 2018+ car's are so fucking fast and stable in that corner, wow
Lewis 2007, 2015 and 2019 🔥
the amount of faith lewis must have had in the car to just completely full send it like that
That 2019 Merc was visibly so much faster through the swimming pool it's quite insane.
2019 cars were fastest ones to race in Monaco. And ofc, Mercedes was the fastest car that weekend.
They carry so much speed there, its insane
great job! an eau-rouge version maybe?
Yes I try to find some footages but it's harder than Monaco.
There is not one camera angle that come back each year like here.
When you talk about eau rouge which camera angle do you think about ? (before the corner or after ?)
@@KingFishF1 before, when you can see the cars 'climbing' the corner. such a shame that we don't have a traditional angle like Monaco has, they even got more than one! anyways, thanks for your research and hope to see more great videos from you
This is the best visual representation of the cars getting heavier and heavier
(2014 --> Now) RIP F1
lewis hamilton around monaco is the single best part of the F1 season
Lmao last year wasnt great for him lol
P8 is the best part of the season?
I love how that nissan patrol stayed for 20 years
That ferrari is on absolute rails
the old engines just sounded so violent, only way i can think to describe it
Cars have become so big!
This weekend looking forward to another set of bangers. Let's see how these ground effect cars take this corner 💪
I did some research: Temperature is a factor that I'm not considering, but I compared the FP2 times for both Spain and Monaco between this year and last. 2022 cars were 1.5 seconds slower in Spain, but only 1 second slower in Monaco. I'm surprised that Monaco has the closer gap, personally.
Back in the days when F1 was fast and exciting…
Man, the modern cars just stick to the ground so much more easily!
The way they bounce in the corner is so aggressive and satisfying
A bunch of things have changed over the years. Obviously the sound dropped in 2014. But the sense of speed is lower with modern camera stabilization and higher resolution. I also think that the tires were incredibly sticky in the 2000s; I'm happy to be corrected.
Adding to that, the size of the cars has changed. When the cars are 20% bigger, I feel like they look 20% slower.
The cars may change, but that Nissan Patrol fire truck in the corner stays the same ;)