Was Willy Wonka a Cannibal? Fan Theory Explained.
Vložit
- čas přidán 23. 11. 2017
- Willy Wonka is seen by many as an eccentric but good natured and friendly hero. But is there more than meets the eye? Is he a murderous madman? Let's explore this wild fan theory.
Spotty Powder: fictioncircus.com/news.php?id=283
FACEBOOK: / generationfilms
What we're reading and watching: www.amazon.com/shop/generatio...
FOLLOW OUR HOSTS:
American Ben: / @americanbenjamin
Allen Xie: / thebeardedasianman
Ben Hedges: / benhedgesntd - Zábava
An actual quote from the book:
"Everything in this room is edible. Why, even I am, but that is called cannibalism which is looked down on in most societies."
Thats in the weird ass remake
Yep
@@reflex2406
Its in both actually
Fun Fact:
The 2005 Movie is also much more closer to the Book then the old Movie
“Everything in this room is eatable. Even I’m eatable! But that is called _cannibalism,_ my dear children, and is in fact frowned upon in most societies.”
.. *Yes teach them at a young age, that's it.*
My favorite line!😄
So he acknowledged the cannibalism?! If he's for some reason aware of it than that means he might be guilty of it, because that's how psychology works. If someone is guilty of something he mightt express it to seem that he's not guilty of the sin
Dumb or what?
exactly. i *can* eat the rock. it'll just be excruciatingly painful, and i'd probably break a few of my teeth before choking on the pieces of them (as well as choking on stone). but, *i can eat a rock.*
This movie took a hard turn with that boat ride.
Ikr....still creeps me out even today.....Gene Wilder played it pure perfection!
Lol no it didn’t
Lmao!! It Really does! Marilyn Manson did a very creepy version of the poem Wanka recites during the boat ride on his Portrait of an American Family album.
Jennifer Brewer yep yep
One of my favorite movie scenes of all time.
“He doesn’t really look that appetising compared to the other children on the tour”
I’m sorry what?
Me: *Backs away slowly* 😳😰
"If you ask me he doesn't look that appetising" ....backs away slowly.
Exactly what I was thinking
If the other Ben dies, we’ll know why.
😂😂😂
Exactly this is damn creepy
*Coughs uncomfortably*
‘He doesn’t really look that appetising’
SliptOnAChip kinda disturbing..love it
Yeah that line sounded like a pedophile
I saw this as soon as he
said it
SliptOnAChip Chris Hanson appears
Bruh he said that when I read this comment
I have a different theory. So I think that although in the book, Willy Wonka actually told Charlie it was a test to see who would win the factory, it was actually a trap. Willy Wonka didn't want to EAT the kids, but rather get them hurt or dead to show his competeters how dangerous the factory was. However, Charlie found the ticket 1 DAY before the tour. This means Wonka didn't know much about what would get him hurt or killed. This is supported when he implies at the beginning that he thinks Charlies ticket is a fake, when really, he was nervous about Charlie and tried to hide it.
It's a lot darker than you realize. The voyage info the chocolate river, and all the insane psychedelic confusion associated with it, ending in sudden calmness actually depicted the ritual violating and murdering of a child victim.
yeah.... and MORE
“Even I’m eat-able. But that is called cannibalism, my dear children, and that is frowned upon in most societies.”
Great start off with the scene scared the carp out of me.
I highly trout that it scared adults who first watched this though.
Highly trout>
Monroville It scared me, and I'm 19...
But did it scare the carp or any other aquatic creatures out of you?
Monroville Absolutely.
it was a trap for the spoiled kids, he was finding a replacement
He’s not a cannibal
He’s a bloody genius!
He shifted through them buy killing or disfiguring them.
Lol “bloody” genius
in the ‘creepy’ tunnel scene...how did he know the exact number of people were gonna be on the boat (amount of seats) after some children had met their faith...it was clearly planned
I agree
Yes *bloody* indeed
When he said "My chocolate! My beautiful chocolate!" I laughed my head off.
Me too, we have more in common with the monster than we do with final girl
Same here. But i was like: "The poor chocolate." 🍫
“He doesn’t really look that appetizing”
New theory: Generation Films is the real cannibal here lol
Possibly.
There should be a distinction made, that the factory is not a carefully constructed death-trap for children, but a carefully constructed death-trap for (bad) children. Even though Charlie broke the rules and even stole from the factory, (but showing remorse, returned the stolen Gobstopper), Wonka knew that Charlie was in essence a good and virtuous child, and duly rewarded him, having known it all along.
Personally, I believe that Wonka isn't a murderer as in one of the films, I remember seeing the other children despite the obvious bad state that they were in. In my opinion, Wonka doesn't attempt to rescue the other children because his outlook on dealing with disobedient kids is to let them suffer the consequences thereby causing the disobedient kids to learn from there foolish ways.
Stephen H exactly! For the exception of Charlie, these children are beyond spoiled, disobedient, etc. They’re monsters. Charlie is the only child that shows compassion and kindness for others. Wonka was no fool.
Stephen H "In my opinion, Wonka doesn't attempt to rescue the other children because his outlook on dealing with disobedient kids is to let them suffer the consequences thereby causing the disobedient kids to learn from *their foolish ways." You're welcome
It shows alot
@ yeah but they did die
@@aWERFRGT6545BGFG they didn't die. What happened was when Charlie asked Mr. Wonka on what's to become of the other kids Wonka tells Charlie that when the other children leave the factory they will be restored to their terrible old selves. And a little bit wiser.
This guys had so many lines that made me laugh:
"Why did the Umpaloompas sing a song about drowning and why did they have something like that prepared?"
"Then the psychotic midgets sang a song about being teleported and zapped through the TV"
"Then then pokemon little dudes sang another song"
"Along with the factory Charlie can inherit all the dead bodies below"
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I really wish they did more of these types of videos on their channel. I really like this one and the pinocchio one.
Yes! That Pinocchio one was amazing! I discovered it today and I've been watching everything that looks interesting!
@@EpicKate pinnochio got pulled down i wish I could show my friend
*Ben: "And remember, it doesn't matter whether you choose to eat people or not, it's how you do it that counts..."*
Me: [Nervous laughter] Sure mate, sure...I just gunna go and...uh...[leaps out window].
😄
Adrenalchrome junkie
"The Management cannot be Held responsible for any accidents incidents. Loss of property or life or limb'' 😮 WTF
It's a joke dumb one
i wouldn't of signed it and if i did id of said I didn't know id fall in a river or blow up like a balloon or be attacked by a squirrel or fall in a tv
2:43 I always thought he was stress eating😂
that makes sense. I actually do tend to do that.
Jason Voorhees 😟don’t kill me pls 😭😭
@@alexanderhopkins917 stolen oh shiitake mushrooms profile picture unless you are a fan
“If you ask me, he doesn’t really look that appetizing compared to the other children…”
*POLICE WE HAVE YOU SURROUNDED*
You do realize that Wonka assures Charley at the end that all the other kids will be fine and in the book they are actually seen leaving, though somewhat worse for wear.
We must also consider that "Slugworth" was in exactly the right place at exactly the right time and Wonka knew Charley would win. This indicates he not only knew who got the tickets beforehand, but had a fair idea of what would make them fail. And is it really psychotic behavior to not be overly concerned about apparent danger when you know that it will all be fine and maybe the kid will learn something in the process?
+
I was going to say that as well... Literacy beats paranoia every time!
He could have been lying. And also they don't show the kids leaving in the original.
SushiLover Puff In the original book, Charlie sees the kids for himself as they were leaving. I believe Varuka Salt was covered in garbage, I don't remember verbatim. But for certain, according to the book, Charlie saw them all leaving alive.
Or _MAYbe_ ... they were candy clones of the original kids, to go out to the world like Junji Ito creations and hype up Wonka candies, while having to live off of them for the rest of their candy bred lives.
so my music teacher actually scared some of the popular kids in my grade with some of his theories that at the end of the first movie, the elevator goes up and never comes down. basically he was saying willy wonka could actually me god or the devil or maybe both. like the room with all edibles was the garden of eden from the bible. bc u can eat anything in there except the fountain. which in the bible, god said u can eat all fruits but from that tree. and the kids who were in my friend group were so intrigued while the rest were absolutely terrified. another thing my teacher noticed was the signing of the paper in case something happened to the kids willy wonka wouldnt be responsible. he said that sounded a lot like them signing a deal with the devil and the whole idea of that was just off putting for him. he also described that a lot of wonkas methods to fix the kids sounded like medieval torture methods. which tbh the way wonka described them, he sounds pretty accurate with his guess. this is just what my teacher thinks though so there is a possibility it can be wrong!
This film is all about pedophilia, cannibalism, bestiality etc, just like he described Pinocchio, same here the demons don't care they know how to mix truth w lies to make us all accomplices of their sins and evil ways,
If you look at the background when Violet takes the gum and walks off a bit, Willy Wonka is smirking like he knows and wants this to happen.
If you start at 8:38 you sound like a Cannibal
Hey stop being rude
@@supermariomya6775 i wasnt plus it was 2 years ago
@@rusticbb8 ok sorry
"Charlie is just a poor boy" from a poor family spare him his life from this monstrosity
"it happens every time. they all become blueberries" Who else has he been experimenting on? Oompa Loompas?
Now that I know about children and adrenochrome this takes on a whole different meaning.
Yes right?! I thought of the movie randomly today and how it probably is about how they eat children
Katy perry bon Appetit, yummy justin bieber, for a better Day avicii.......they are exposing it they try to normalize their sich evil Rituals........Hollywood and Politics are all inside child abuse and caniba.
@@elizabethbaron7904 💯
Your camera seemed a little off, it may just be delayed or maybe just its out of focus.
It's more than just the camera.
Ethan Rose Yeah kinda laggy
I have a theory on top of this Theory. it is perhaps that since every kid except for Charlie Bucket was televised about finding the golden ticket, but not Charlie Bucket it is possible to theorize that Willy Wonka researched all for kids before letting them enter his Factory therefore having tricks and traps for those children in particular that he knew they would quickly fall for but since Charlie Bucket wasn't televised he didn't have an endgame for Charlie except to try and kick him out. But then when he gives him the Gobstopper and they go into the elevator made of glass it's possible that Willy Wonka wanted a death wish to kill himself with Charlie.
Verucca wasn't televised either, dumbass. Therefore your point is invalid.
Also, Charlie was in the newspaper in the first film and Wonka even mentions this, so again, you are wrong.
Thirdly, wonka says he had to find a sweet child, so he seeked out Charlie, so that's yet another thing you are wrong about. Did you even watch the film?
@@MrParkerman6 bruh why are you being so rude about it? I actually agree with the theory
I just noticed u kinda look like charlie when he’s older.
🤣
Yaaaaahhhh🤤🤤👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽
Lmaoo
Haha.
The more they reveal, the more I see him as a maniac
Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad you should check out that SCP-001:O5. I think you are gonna like it
Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad the more you know eh
If you've ever read the sequel book, Charlie and The Great Glass Elevator, you know he's going crazy in some way. Wonka convinces the US government that he and the others are aliens, only to encounter real aliens on the space station with them. It's equal or more wild than the first book.
Well he does wear the purple, like all the characters in fantasy that's supposed to represent the devil's assistant like the Joker, or the Clown from Spawn
I liked Johnny Depp version better, he didn't act creepy, he was in fact kinda afraid of the children, which was funny
It's commonly said that Roald Dahl absolutely loathed the Gene Wilder film version, but I've read that in fact, Dahl only hated the musical numbers -- particularly the Oompa-Loompa songs. But he was thrilled by the set designs, and supposedly thought that the screenplay improved on his book in a couple of subtle, important ways.
(For instance, making Charlie's mom a widow -- both his parents were alive in the book -- added a poignant "boy's search for a surrogate father-figure" element to the story. Also Charlie's decision to give the Everlasting Gobstopper back to Wonka -- "So shines a good deed in a weary world" -- was a creation of the screenwriters, not Dahl.)
I’ve been saying for years that willie was a child murderer
Well, looks like him and Freddy Krueger would be drinking buddies
That boat scene never scared me but when that girl turning into a big balloon
"I don’t think he looks delicious at all
Me: are you a cannibal?
I suspect the original book was intended to suggest Wonka was a mad killer, but the movie makers realized that they were making a kid's movie, and at that time a serial killer of kids and their family to make snacks was too far to go, so the spotted powder scene was cut, and the upbeat ending was added, to sell the idea Wonka was just eccentric.
Jonathan Brooks The opposite, the book says that Charlie saw them all leave alive but worse-for-wear.
Yes in the book we DO see all the kids come out of the factory and Mike is so tall Wonka makes a joke how every school will want him to play basketball!
Plus The New Movie with Johnny Depp Keeps The Book's Original Ending When The Kids' Go Home With Their Parents :)
He didn't kill anyone in the book. You see them leave pretty alive if you ask me.
The original book was a goofy kids book, by a famouse children's book author so no, he probably wasn't intended to be a mad killer and just off topic, the book also got a sequel called willy wonka and the great glass elevator where willy wonka, charlie, and his whole family went to space in the glass elevator, and I think I remember that they encountered some alliens
This feels like film theory, but I like it
he meant LIKE film theory the channel
Hey i like film theroy
I haven't seen this movie, only CZcams videos about it. But it seems to me like the makers of this movie wanted to change the story and make Willy Wonka evil, while the newer movie with Johnny Depp as Willy Wonka is more true to the book.
No One That's exactly what I thought.
Gene Wilder insisted on starting his first scene with the cane so no one would know if you could trust Wonka or not.
I think the newer version of the story does stay closer to the book but fails miserably in comparison to the original film in every other way. Just my opinion of course.
Gene Wilder's Will Wonka>Johnny Depp's Willy Wonka.
The newer version does NOT stay closer to the book. The book doesn't have the father subplot, and much of the dialouge is directly lifted from the first film.
Oompa Loompa, Doompa Dee-Do / Oompa Loompa, Doompa Da-Dee
(Translation)
We're trapped, Wonka's a madman help us, save us. Wonka's a madman help us, save us. Wonka's a madman help us, save us.
Aldon Blackreyne dont we love spy kids
How the hell did you figure that out
We're trapped will the commander help us, save us.
Has anyone noticed how he doesn’t effing blink throughout the whole movie, just looking down, but never a real blink!!!!!!
"there's a missing chapter..."
oh boy.
Just read it and it’s fucked up to be honest.
"Everything in this room is edible, children. Even I am edible! Although, children, that is what we call 'cannibalism', and it is frowned upon in most of society."
- Willy Wonka, 2005
Honestly, this makes a lot of sense. Observe his behavior, it truly doesn't look like he gives no f*ck and is just smiling playefully about it
You ruined my childhood.
Zayne Rodgers :'))
Willy wonky kind of looks like American Ben
More Like Gene Wilder
I would throw up If American Ben runs a chocolate factory.
“He doesn’t look appetizing to me”
0_0 Uhm what do you mean
Very interesting
+HoboJoe2016 i got blasted in the heart bro
Little
Orange
Pokémon
Dudes
Charmander in a nutshell
That’s why Johnny Depp’s Wonka is the one I love, because he is cute and not creepy. lol.
Edit: he is also my spirit animal.
"And guess what, your weird uncle might be too." Got me dieing.
I think that Wonka isn't a murderer or cannibal because when the mishaps happened to the children Wonka told the Ommpa Loompas to hurry the child's parent to where the children were going to end up.
There's a part in the book that talks about how Charlie and Wanka watch the kids and parents leaving the factory. Dont get me wrong though, This is still a very entertaining video. I love Gene Wilder as Wonka and an Actor.
“...Candy and little orange slave men” 🤣😂🤣🤣🤣
8:38 ummm... is there something you need to tell us, Charlie? How would you know how humans will taste based upon appearance?
Awesome video! I didn’t even think this theory was very believable, but it was presented very well and honestly I’m intrigued to learn more
This movie scared me when I was young
I wouldn't waste a second to run away from Wonka's presence!!!
He is the most terrifying person I've ever seen!!!
I imagine the boat not having enough seats was an oversight, because they didn’t need to make a seat for someone they knew wouldn’t be in that scene, but they didn’t think of the implications, but it was so perfectly subtle that people created the idea that it was planned.
I think he IS evil because:
1.When the children get in trouble, he just stares and does'nt care
2.When Augustus Gloop fell into the chocolate pool,he smiled an icey smile as if to say "oh yes,he is gonna be in big trouble."Then when he saw the glass tubes,he smiled an EVIL smile
You know the remake made wonka less creepy and made me feel like he wouldn't put on a hockey mask and get a machete or a knife.
Brian Bozeman Johnny Depp is muuuch better, and i didn't think he was creepy in any scene. But the blonde guy is the creepiest thing in the movie
No way. The remake makes Wonka a lot creepier and makes it feel like he cares about kids a lot less. How do you explain: "Hi, I'm Violet Beauregarde." "Uh, I don't care."
The Johnny Depp Wonka was a terrible terrible villain because of the way he treated people when he was leading them around his factory. He was not a good host at all, and said a lot of inappropriate things.
Gene Wilder-amazing actor all around, but really owned this part.
Wonka book and both movies: **reference cannibalism**
Epic movie: “write that down!! Write that down!!”
I never took it so literally, rather having the factory as a representation of chance, circumstance and the world coming back around to punish those who live immorally, refuse to grow up and take what's not theirs without hesitation. Wonka himself is according to this interpretation just an avatar of the chaos, capriciousness and cruelty innate to the world, no more evil than fire, but just as dangerous.
Dat intro 😂
This is pretty Twisted Theory but it makes a lot of sense😈.
Well, Wonka must've had many times someone went into the river, so he wasn't phased by it due to seeing it so many times. He also could've watched the news, due to it telling the names of the Golden Ticket Winners. He could've used the news to make up a song about him, he could've also guessed he was a glutton, due to him eating so much chocolate a day.
Like last time, He knew Violet would've grabbed the gum without asking. It's a contest after all to get the factory. He knew the Oompa Loompas can do the same thing without popping her, they've done it to every other Oompa Loompa. Of course he would have a song ready for her because he knew how much she loved gum.
Wonka didn't know if he could've sent a human through the TV. It's used to shrink chocolate so people can taste his chocolate for free and buy more. Greed would've obviously been the song because he was greedy to be in Television.
Veruca wanted a golden goose. Thus making the spoiled song. She couldn't get that goose and started throwing a tantrum, making her not fit for the factory. If you would let someone own the biggest factory selling chocolate you wouldn't want it to be someone irresponsible. Of course, Wonka knew Oompa Loompas would be down there, they had to watch the fire so the place doesn't burn down, the fire starts to go out, ETC.
Charlie most likely didn't ever have Soda. So his Grandpa went to give Charlie a taste. The fan could be for popping bubbles if they exit the factory. Wonka gets mad because they disobeyed a rule, using one of his inventions. He didn't want his inventions tested and that explains the Gobstoppers and other candies.
Ok what I’m really worried about is where the juice came out of when they juiced that little girl, and if they’ll actually re-use the juice.
Why is it when we are kids we see Willy Wonka for what he is a magic candy maker, when we get older he becomes a kid hating cannibal sounds to me some people grow up looking for the worst in life, I hope you get happy, if you want cannibals check out texas chainsaw and hills have eyes there is no guessing there.
Fun fact: that beginning scene never scared me, even as a kid
This is the second video I watch on your channel... I enjoy the tongue in cheek comments more. LOL!
I just subscribed... looking forward to more.
I gotta say that the idea he is more Jigsaw and less Hannibal Lechter makes more sense. Especially being as it is based on a book and if everybody there over comes their own nature they can escape.
The first part was my favorite, it just made me feel comfortable. But, he isn't a cannibal, he's just a odd person. ^^
When I was a kid I was always scared of this movie because he screams at Charlie at the end🤣😂
If this is true, Willy Wonka is like a more colorful incarnation of H.H Holmes. For those who don’t know, Holmes was America’s first serial killer in the late 1800’s. He built a building in Chicago, later on called the murder castle, which had many rooms and chambers designed to trap people (which sounds a lot like Wonka’s factory). Holmes was a former doctor and was obsessed with killing and dissecting humans. Look him up online for more information.
Whenever he says he didn’t eat him cause he didn’t look appetizing maybe wonka didn’t eat him cause he wanted to sell the factory to Charlie and not to the other kids cause they would end up paying the fines that he couldn’t but since Charlie was poor he couldn’t, and he didn’t want to give it to someone who could eventually own the place because then he’d be giving his work to someone else, Charlie couldn’t pay so he wouldn’t last as the owner ... this is my theory of why he gave it to Charlie (watched flim theory to come up with this)
In the remake they came back after Charlie wins
christopher kein but thats the remake
It's in the original book too, which was made before any of the movie versions, so we can assume it was offscreen in the old movie because deleted scenes are canon in my opinion.
christopher kein in the remake it’s called ‘Charlie and the Chocolate factory’
In the movie they come back too. He says that they were all returned to their old terrible selves...
Saying isn't showing. Wonka was lying, and deleted scenes do NOT count as canon, and there aren't even deleted scenes showing the kids. In the FIRST film he killed them! Period!
I thought the chocolate river looked like BLOOD!
You’re beautiful and talented 🙏🏾
8:43 "if you ask me he really doesnt look as appetizing as the other children on the tour " ...uhhh what
I got here from the Pinocchio vid, these classic film theory vids with Ben are a rare gem on CZcams!
Chill everybody we gotta remember this is still a movie
MatPat: But that's just a theory, a film theory!
This scared me because I loved this movie but I was scared by this plz my childhood was ruined plz pay for my therapy guys
It’s only 1 like per lesson
Natsuki Doki Doki literature club Not Monika
no therapy for ya you will have too deal with it
Just Monika
Well, considering the theory falls flat all over the place, your childhood should be okay.
I was always scared of this movie...
its 4 am and i am watching willy wonka cannibal fan theories....
Oompa Loompas sing Pre prepared songs?...
BISH THIS IS A MUSICAL!
I think he really only did all of this to teach them a lesson, he’s a genius- not a murderer
Also, in the book, the geese are replaced by squirrels which tap verrucsas head, declare her a "bad nut" and throw her in an incinerator. These squirrels were clearly too smart to confuse a person with a fucking walnut, since they seemingly morally assessed verruca just by tapping her head, so it seems like they were trained to not only break nuts open, but throw "bad" children into a literal furnace.
I would say that Augustus is at the very least, gray. He doesn't get warned until after he's already drinking from the Chocolate River. Before then, when the kids enter the candy room, Wonka encourages all the children and their parents to eat to their heart's content, explaining that EVERYTHING in the room is editable. Sure, after being warned, Augustus still takes one more gulp from the river before he falls in, which is why I'll say gray, because he technically DID disobey. But it's not like Wonka warned them all going in that the Chocolate in the river can't be touch by human hands, and that there was a possibility of being sucked into the pumps, so it DOES seem very much like entrapment.
Also, pretty crappy for a Chocolate maker to promise the kids a lifetime supply of candy, then scold them for being greedy and gluttonous. Kind of like a drug dealer lecturing his customers about addiction.
I read that "spotty powder"
That was very interesting and thank u for letting us know...
The Gallifreyan Lord i never really cared about that scene, the person looked like they had a snake on there face. The older version is very confusing to me
8:43 what do you mean he doesn’t look that appetising Ben is there something you’re not telling us?
Maybe just overthinking it? Many fairy tales for children were pretty grim when you think about it. My thinking has always been that it was a children's cautionary tale about bad behavior such as greed, narcissism, gluttony, etc. And maybe Wonka was himself about personality defects resulting from isolation.
And were the various vehicles "right sized" because Wonka had some predetermined sinister plan to off the kids or just because the production department constructed the vehicles for the cast members they would carry at that point in the story?
An adult man luring a bunch of children into his property with the promise of candy... Well, nothing suspicious about that!
Rip Gene Wilder
New Theory: Generation Films Is A Cannibal. Explanation : 8:44
British story telling tradition of "cautionary tales" - was an old fashioned way of teaching children values
Australian Centre For Voice Dialogue Roald Dahl wrote this. Yes, he was British..also married for a while to Patricia Neal, Best actress Oscar for her role in Hud.
Jack Albertson who portrayed Grandpa Joe also lent his voice to Amos Slade in The Fox and the Hound.
Never take candy from strangers because what happened to them will happen to you 😈
There’s a hair in my candy
In the ORIGINAL British edition of the book, the Oompa-Loompas were described -- and illustrated -- as African pygmies with nappy hair, full lips, and skin such a dark shade of brown that one of the kids thinks they're chocolate statues magically brought to life by Wonka!
Needless to say, the concept of UNPAID black Africans happy to be removed from Loompaland and work in the White Man's factory turned out to be controversial -- for the American edition, and subsequent British editions, the "negro" Oompa-Loompas basically became three-foot-tall California surfer dudes, with tanned skin, blue eyes, and blond hair. (There was still a weird Benevolent Colonialist vibe, but without the racial angle.)
Love your annalists! Would like to see more on family movies like this, as I’m not the biggest sci fi fan