'You Won't Be Frank With The Committee About Your Past': Hawley Presses Biden Judicial Nominee

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 13. 07. 2021
  • In today's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) grilled Myrna Pérez, nominee to be United States Circuit Judge for the Second Circuit, on her past remarks and her refusal to answer questions about her opinion on Supreme Court decisions.
    Stay Connected
    Forbes on Facebook: forbes
    Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
    Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
    More From Forbes: forbes.com

Komentáře • 4,1K

  • @andrewolearnick5739
    @andrewolearnick5739 Před 2 lety +807

    Any Republican who approves this lying advocate needs to be removed. This woman has no place in a judges position.

    • @Bro-bi3in
      @Bro-bi3in Před 2 lety +16

      Well said

    • @paulcolburn3855
      @paulcolburn3855 Před 2 lety +5

      Agreed but it is irrelevant. All 50 democrat senators will vote to appoint and VP Harris will cast the deciding vote. She'll be in. The GOP can't stop her.

    • @sierraguru6942
      @sierraguru6942 Před 2 lety +2

      Its like watching Amy Coney Barrett not answer questions. Not as rushed or as important but there are similarities.

    • @ICU-mw7su
      @ICU-mw7su Před 2 lety +3

      @@paulcolburn3855 Wish they'd all just go hang out at the bar with their Texan lackeys this week!!

    • @freddavis5788
      @freddavis5788 Před 2 lety +2

      Agreed

  • @williamowens7269
    @williamowens7269 Před 2 lety +744

    Don't appoint her, anybody can see she's lying

    • @robinbanks895
      @robinbanks895 Před 2 lety +14

      Of course she’s lying.

    • @ninaappelt9001
      @ninaappelt9001 Před 2 lety +13

      You can bet the Democrats are falling all over each to confirm her.

    • @boom8250
      @boom8250 Před 2 lety +9

      All liberals lie like this

    • @r.m.5548
      @r.m.5548 Před 2 lety +6

      She's answering these questions as if someone told her she's getting in no matter what. So she doesn't answer anything properly.

    • @robinbanks895
      @robinbanks895 Před 2 lety +3

      @@r.m.5548 Exactly.

  • @69spanks
    @69spanks Před 2 lety +270

    She is full of it. She’ll fit just fine in this never ending sh*tshow…
    I’m an activist, but once I’m approved I promise I won’t be one anymore…lol

    • @Mister8224
      @Mister8224 Před 2 lety +4

      Senator, that's correct, I'm an axe murderer, but if confirmed i promise not to cut anybodys head off--- at least not right now!

    • @janishart5128
      @janishart5128 Před 2 lety +2

      Well said - THANK YOU!!!! She's a dirty, lying, amoral khhawwmeee, and danger to society and needs to be LOCKED UP!!!!

    • @curts.5669
      @curts.5669 Před 2 lety +1

      This person radiates arrogance. I'm so thankful Jeremy and probably most others can see through her manipulative, deceitful tactics.

    • @user-cd6yl4uc2q
      @user-cd6yl4uc2q Před 2 lety

      A zebra doesn’t change. Their stripes. This woman is just your average low IQ activist.

  • @josephroberts6027
    @josephroberts6027 Před 2 lety +60

    This woman does not belong as a judge! Anyone can see that she WILL not be impartial!

    • @petergunn153
      @petergunn153 Před 2 lety

      She can become a dog catcher. She has the talent for that! And you don't have to answer questions as dog catcher. However she needs to hope she don't run into an attack dog which might confirm her to heaven!

  • @digggerrjones7345
    @digggerrjones7345 Před 2 lety +644

    If a nominee will not answer questions, eliminate them and move on to the next.

    • @rw9573
      @rw9573 Před 2 lety +8

      All his nominees have not answered questions and have still been installed

    • @venusreena2532
      @venusreena2532 Před 2 lety +5

      Republicans are too weak to do that

    • @miamibeach9552
      @miamibeach9552 Před 2 lety +8

      It would take the whole 4 years of the administration because NOT one single nominee has answered the questions

    • @healingbuddy
      @healingbuddy Před 2 lety +2

      They didn't do that during the Trump administration. Same thing happened and more. Give me a break.

    • @markd8508
      @markd8508 Před 2 lety +6

      Unfortunately, the next one will be a stonewalling activist too. Dodge, dive, dip, duck and dodge,

  • @patrickshannon2536
    @patrickshannon2536 Před 2 lety +328

    This woman should not be a federal judge she's evasive about certain questions

    • @WyattRyeSway
      @WyattRyeSway Před 2 lety +12

      She should not be a local dog catcher, let alone a judge.

    • @trishbrumfield8507
      @trishbrumfield8507 Před 2 lety +13

      she's evasive about EVERY question

    • @TheAngryal
      @TheAngryal Před 2 lety +4

      Evasive on ALL questions. She should never become a member of the DOJ. She's as slippery as snake. A typical lefty, expert at looking into your eyes and lying through her teeth.

    • @Christopher_Bachm
      @Christopher_Bachm Před 2 lety +1

      She was clear and direct to the point. Republican nonsense continues unabated.

    • @Christopher_Bachm
      @Christopher_Bachm Před 2 lety

      @@donnaayala60 I did and I see now why you think badgering someone with false assertions and nonsense is the strategy.. Good Luck...

  • @csinvegas4196
    @csinvegas4196 Před 2 lety +114

    She’s dancing around every question asked to her about her record

    • @lindaselander9602
      @lindaselander9602 Před 2 lety +2

      Spin n deflect, bt she gt caught!😳

    • @janishart5128
      @janishart5128 Před 2 lety

      @@lindaselander9602: That's the problem with dirty, evil, amoral, county-destroying, kawwmeee DemoCROOKS - they assume everyone else is as STOOOOPID (several levels below regular 'stupid'!) as they are!!!

    • @petergunn153
      @petergunn153 Před 2 lety

      She knows she has an Activist record and as such reminds the Senators that she will NOT uphold the law as it need be! Therefore, she doesn't get confirmed! Serves her right for being an Activist judge!

  • @HjbProductions
    @HjbProductions Před 2 lety +69

    When you answer a Yes or No question with something else your typically hiding something.

    • @janishart5128
      @janishart5128 Před 2 lety

      EXACTLY!!!

    • @petergunn153
      @petergunn153 Před 2 lety

      She wouldn't even give a yes or no answer. As you say, she is hiding her true self in front of the Senators This makes her suspicious of not telling the truth under oath! How could she be confirmed when after everything is said and done, you remain in the blind as to who MS Perez really is. The apple doesn't fall far away from the tree. If she is BRANDON'S pick , how can she be confirmed?

  • @mariefremlin7536
    @mariefremlin7536 Před 2 lety +907

    We don't need activist judges. We need justice for all, not just for some.

    • @bertmc4442
      @bertmc4442 Před 2 lety +11

      it will be rare when you have F democrats in congress and senate. as I believe those in judiciary are mostly corrupted by soros org

    • @jbarton1541
      @jbarton1541 Před 2 lety +10

      Well, I find it funny to see Josh Hawley, Insurrectionist, asking anyone else questions about what is good for this country. That POS should not have his seat and should be awaiting trial for SEDITION. Josh Hawley advocated for the violet overthrow of our DULY ELECTED government just to gain favor with a LYING RACIST CON MAN.

    • @saltpro5603
      @saltpro5603 Před 2 lety +14

      @@jbarton1541 the big lie is the democrats calling Jan 6th an insurrection or claiming that it’s the worst tax since 9/11....... not a single person who has been arrested for Jan 6th has a charge of insurrection. Calling it as such is a huge lie, not to mention that IF that’s actually what it was, then it would not have looked anything like what it did. Trust me, you’ll know it if the right side of this country attempts an insurrection 😉

    • @MsGroyal
      @MsGroyal Před 2 lety +12

      J Barton Been been drinking that Fake news/Democrat kook aid again haven’t you?

    • @mariefremlin7536
      @mariefremlin7536 Před 2 lety +13

      @@jbarton1541 What I find funny is Democrat activists did the exact same thing in 2016 when Trump got elected but nobody called it an "Insurrection" or "overthrowing our Democracy" then. You watch too much CNN and believe the mainstream CIA news too much.

  • @pirongia5168
    @pirongia5168 Před 2 lety +457

    This "forked tongue" woman would be dangerous on the federal bench.

    • @1Maccabee
      @1Maccabee Před 2 lety +14

      if you mean "bad for the freedoms of the American people", then yes, I agree with you

    • @timmythecat7478
      @timmythecat7478 Před 2 lety +13

      Yes, she is guided by HER beliefs and NOT by the US Constitution and the BOR. She would inject her opinion into all of HER decisions and forgo the US Constitution and the BOR. Do not trust her.

    • @elavke5441
      @elavke5441 Před 2 lety +4

      Yes indeed

    • @elavke5441
      @elavke5441 Před 2 lety +1

      @@timmythecat7478 what is the BOR

    • @williamfranx3422
      @williamfranx3422 Před 2 lety +3

      Worthless

  • @boss290bafalcon
    @boss290bafalcon Před 2 lety +38

    Can’t give a straight answer. Wouldn’t it be great if every politician or judge would be jailed if they change their promise and not keep their word to the people

    • @gregh7400
      @gregh7400 Před 2 lety

      It's ridiculous to demand an appointee to say how they would vote in advance. No 2 cases are ever the same because of the variables in each case are always going to be different. Lawyers who work for clients make arguments in court that they don't necessarily agree with all the time because they are trying to win a case for their client. That's their job. To come along years later and use that to pin them down on an issue is retarded. These morons in the senate always ask questions they know appointees cannot answer. It makes them look stupid except to uninformed stupid people. And judges take oaths to the constitution, not to people.

    • @pattyoneill6724
      @pattyoneill6724 Před 2 lety

      If she says Senator one more time she should be smothered ! What a slimy witch !

    • @petergunn153
      @petergunn153 Před 2 lety

      That would be great. People like her must think that the Senators are stupid! When they don't confirm her, we will see who has the last laugh! She will be declared stupid for losing the confirmation, a product of her own doing!

  • @shepherdgroup2487
    @shepherdgroup2487 Před 2 lety +33

    If an attorney answer questions in this manner in her court....she would have their head.

  • @stealth9tn
    @stealth9tn Před 2 lety +626

    This woman surely doesn't need to have any power to judge others.

  • @tammyjohnson8161
    @tammyjohnson8161 Před 2 lety +1048

    Judges are NOT supposed to be ACTIVIST!!!! They are to be neutral and fair and follow the laws!!!

    • @kevinm3751
      @kevinm3751 Před 2 lety +21

      Unfortunately that professional rule does not apply to democrat socialist!

    • @alyceknowlton-jablonski7427
      @alyceknowlton-jablonski7427 Před 2 lety +8

      She is currently an attorney and activist, not a judge. As a judge, an oath is taken to be neutral and fair when listening to testimony and ruling based on PRECIDENT developed under upper court rulings. All current judges, even SCOTUS, began as attorneys, with their own opinions and beliefs. Hawley, Cruz and company all know this to be true and are purely playing theatrics.

    • @tivmego
      @tivmego Před 2 lety +25

      @@alyceknowlton-jablonski7427
      When you are this deluded to think now that she is a judge, she will just give up her opinion about rules.
      How old are you?

    • @alyceknowlton-jablonski7427
      @alyceknowlton-jablonski7427 Před 2 lety +4

      @@tivmego She didn't have to give up her opinions. A judge doesn't RULE on a case with their opinions. We expect conservative judges to rule using evidence and presidence, not their opinion and that is what they do. She is no different.

    • @nathanmichaels14
      @nathanmichaels14 Před 2 lety +13

      @@alyceknowlton-jablonski7427 wow really! She will not answer any questions at all!

  • @pauliewaitemore6324
    @pauliewaitemore6324 Před 2 lety +5

    Honesty / Transparency / integrity = JOSH HAWLEY. Thank you for letting the voters know where you stand. BRAVO!

  • @joankain6193
    @joankain6193 Před 2 lety +10

    In Just a Few of Many Positive Words to Describe Him, Hawley is Honorable - Intact - Amazing - - -

  • @pizzafrenzyman
    @pizzafrenzyman Před 2 lety +349

    He tripped her up, and she fell in to his trap. Busted.

    • @christopherclark5604
      @christopherclark5604 Před 2 lety +3

      @Christopher Riveraaround 3.30-4.00 minute mark. She admits one was decided correctly but wouldn't admit to the others.

    • @pizzafrenzyman
      @pizzafrenzyman Před 2 lety +4

      @Christopher Rivera At 2:14 she admits that the Supreme Court correctly decided a case, but would not agree to the Supreme Court's decisions on the other cases where she publicly stated that the Supreme Court decided incorrectly. In other words, her inability to remain impartial on case law is being called in to question as a jurist.
      The setup was giving Perez several questions where Hawley knows her past public comments regarding the Supreme Court decisions, then Hawley throws Perez a layup that he knew she would accept as correctly decided. The structure of the questioning was designed to get her to admit that she can't remain impartial to case law. She took a full bite from the poo sandwich and didn't even have a good out for it.

    • @pizzafrenzyman
      @pizzafrenzyman Před 2 lety +1

      @Christopher Rivera This has nothing to do with conservatives and liberals. It has to do with impartial jurists. Your spin is deceptive, and shows your true political colors. Judges must be impartial and decide cases based on clear eyes and existing case law. The fact that she is second guessing the Supreme Court is embarrassing to her nomination.

  • @Livefreeordi
    @Livefreeordi Před 2 lety +367

    She’s a judge, omg! Not the standard I would expect.

    • @HeavyK.
      @HeavyK. Před 2 lety +8

      I would rather have a hundred Judge Judys.

    • @ScarletBrimstone
      @ScarletBrimstone Před 2 lety +7

      @@HeavyK. at least she gets it right most of the time. Hell, why not? Let's appoint Judge Judy.

    • @jonathanwilliams1065
      @jonathanwilliams1065 Před 2 lety +2

      She’s not a judge yet

    • @ruthwidlund6429
      @ruthwidlund6429 Před 2 lety

      People like her are the reason child molesters have gotten a two months or three and left out on bail, and one or two as I recall,j just got bail.

    • @nathanieljohnson8073
      @nathanieljohnson8073 Před 2 lety

      Why she say before God but can't answer questions.

  • @amy3458
    @amy3458 Před 2 lety +6

    LOVE MY SENATOR HAWKEY!
    You represent the heart of Missouri.
    Thank you, Sir, for your tireless work.

    • @petergunn153
      @petergunn153 Před 2 lety

      ONE OF MY FAVORITE SENATORS in the congress today. If she thinks she can con him she certainly is stupid. Senator Hawley read right through her and got her number loud and clear!

  • @SuperBigblue19
    @SuperBigblue19 Před 2 lety +15

    She's so full of it. If she wasn't intending to be an activist judge she wouldn't have been so invested in complaining about high court rulings. This Zebra ain't changing her stripes . Just own what you believe & let the chips fall where they may. All this dancing around the bush is just pathetic .

  • @adolfsniffler7564
    @adolfsniffler7564 Před 2 lety +1300

    If she had integrity she would stand by her words, but she lies.

    • @33flutterbykisses
      @33flutterbykisses Před 2 lety +17

      Nice name! LMAO! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Glad I’m not smelling what he is! 🤮🤣🤣🤣

    • @twothreefour234
      @twothreefour234 Před 2 lety +28

      you can get over an opposing opinion but refusing to answer . scrap pile. get rid of it.

    • @johnlerner5346
      @johnlerner5346 Před 2 lety +10

      Criminal Evidence on Bidens illegal China Connections with proof.
      www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2020-11-18%20HSGAC%20-%20Finance%20Joint%20Report%20Supplemental.pdf

    • @deantait8326
      @deantait8326 Před 2 lety +16

      Lying by Omission.

    • @Rita-yi4vv
      @Rita-yi4vv Před 2 lety +6

      Did you listen to Amy Camry Barret's confirmations hearings? Maybe Brett Kavanaugh's? How about Sonia Sotomayor or John Roberts.. ? This is pretty much how they answer all their questions. 🙄

  • @veroniquel7492
    @veroniquel7492 Před 2 lety +261

    She couldn’t stop blinking when she responds. That’s a clear sign she’s not being frank and truthful

    • @alyceknowlton-jablonski7427
      @alyceknowlton-jablonski7427 Před 2 lety

      Ever heard of contact lenses???

    • @monkeyman193
      @monkeyman193 Před 2 lety +4

      I bet you were blinking while you were typing this.

    • @Henry.58
      @Henry.58 Před 2 lety +5

      @@alyceknowlton-jablonski7427 Ever heard of lying ?

    • @Henry.58
      @Henry.58 Před 2 lety

      @@monkeyman193 😂

    • @randybobandy9828
      @randybobandy9828 Před 2 lety +5

      @@alyceknowlton-jablonski7427 ya I have contact lenses and I don't blink anymore than a regular person. What a shitty excuse.

  • @sunlite9759
    @sunlite9759 Před 2 lety +7

    She refused to disavow that she will judge by her activism cases before her.
    "The definitions of insanity is voting for Democrats over and over and expecting different results!"

  • @Hankola
    @Hankola Před 2 lety +10

    Basically, she's throwing out her own opinion of the case and going with the SCOTUS. She won't answer those types of questions no matter how pressed.

  • @Jo-ys5le
    @Jo-ys5le Před 2 lety +295

    I don't like Perez - She is too sneaky in her statements! DO NOT APPOINT HER!

    • @ninaappelt9001
      @ninaappelt9001 Před 2 lety +10

      And quite condescending.

    • @barrelbum1016
      @barrelbum1016 Před 2 lety +7

      Appoint her to Alcatraz

    • @boom8250
      @boom8250 Před 2 lety +2

      All liberals lie like this

    • @ms_understood630
      @ms_understood630 Před 2 lety

      @imam omar look no further than to your response here. This is what is wrong with our country.

    • @petergunn153
      @petergunn153 Před 2 lety

      NOT to fear! She will be confirmed to dog catcher ONLY, NEVER as a federal judge especially when she is an activist judge!

  • @lockheedskunkworks5687
    @lockheedskunkworks5687 Před 2 lety +80

    She’ll have to circle back after talking in circles

  • @shawnalleman7535
    @shawnalleman7535 Před 2 lety +10

    Exactly Senator, her decisions of her past record will reflect how she'll rule! Jim Crowe, wow! Keep her from the bench!

  • @lostinpa-dadenduro7555
    @lostinpa-dadenduro7555 Před 2 lety +6

    Senator if I get this job I will have this job. Thank you for your question. They are so evasive.

  • @lizzieb6311
    @lizzieb6311 Před 2 lety +306

    Perez: “Senator, I refuse to answer any questions because to do so would reveal my true radical Leftist nature “

    • @Krucifus
      @Krucifus Před 2 lety +21

      That's what I heard as well.

    • @DeadPresidents408
      @DeadPresidents408 Před 2 lety +3

      I heard the same last year when ACB was hand picked last year for Supreme Court. She has some far right beliefs and look at her now

    • @lindaselander9602
      @lindaselander9602 Před 2 lety +3

      Ooh well put!😋

    • @sethjohnson1590
      @sethjohnson1590 Před 2 lety +3

      Dam right! Sicko!

    • @benjamintickle1476
      @benjamintickle1476 Před 2 lety +2

      That was the other voice in my head and that voice is on the reservation.

  • @kathrynswift2524
    @kathrynswift2524 Před 2 lety +55

    She is speaking in circles, and lies through her teeth.

    • @jannanijland5336
      @jannanijland5336 Před 2 lety

      hawley is asking her gotcha questions, at least he's trying to. But she does not fall for it.

  • @ppheanix
    @ppheanix Před 2 lety +8

    Starting each reply with "Senator..." is like someone on Judge Judy who starts each reply with "Your Honour..." because they don't have an honest answer or they don't want to answer the question truthfully.

    • @petergunn153
      @petergunn153 Před 2 lety

      Lets cut to the chase: If she is a BRANDON appointee, she is a loser! There is no room on the Federal bench for losers! She did an excellent job of convincing the Senators they all she is is an ACTIVIST LOSER not worthy of confirmation. The Senators will now act accordingly by NOT giving her a confirmation! This is how her movie will end!

  • @jj.harvey4067
    @jj.harvey4067 Před 2 lety +9

    “Honorable?” Myrna Perez: I’m testifying, because I’ve been nominated for a Federal Judgeship, but all my past personal Judicial Views (which I made public), are now completely immaterial…and I swear to God, that I will faithfully discharge my duties, and apply laws both fairly & impartially based upon legal precedence….ALL 100% TOTAL BS……………….

  • @JJawsyW
    @JJawsyW Před 2 lety +70

    Vote her a no go. Anyone that will not answer a question has something to hide.

  • @kermitkroll5332
    @kermitkroll5332 Před 2 lety +83

    She is a true democrat a compulsive liar.

    • @scruffy281
      @scruffy281 Před 2 lety +2

      compulsive and repulsive.........

    • @kimberlymac4ever
      @kimberlymac4ever Před 2 lety

      Go away little boy, no one cares what you have to say. When you become a man, open your mouth and speak.

    • @ICU-mw7su
      @ICU-mw7su Před 2 lety

      That's redundant! 😅

  • @SreeramReddyB
    @SreeramReddyB Před 2 lety +2

    That guy straight up said I won’t be able to support your nomination. Well said.

    • @petergunn153
      @petergunn153 Před 2 lety

      He was honest with her and told her in no uncertain terms that she doesn't qualify to sit on the appellate judge bench ever!

  • @AlucardRo
    @AlucardRo Před 2 lety +4

    I love how every time when a yes or no question is asked they never answer with yes or no.

  • @BruceNicholas
    @BruceNicholas Před 2 lety +136

    The country she loves is the one they want to make in the ashes of this one.

  • @brockrumley6167
    @brockrumley6167 Před 2 lety +75

    Look how easy she can look right in his eyes and lie

    • @nickglenister3832
      @nickglenister3832 Před 2 lety +1

      it's easy for them, and she's a woman.

    • @randybobandy9828
      @randybobandy9828 Před 2 lety +4

      It's alot like breathing for democrats...if they don't lie they simply can't breathe.

    • @kathyflorcruz552
      @kathyflorcruz552 Před 2 lety +2

      They're psychotic. Just like on the MSM & in Hollywood.

    • @ICU-mw7su
      @ICU-mw7su Před 2 lety +1

      She is a Liberal, after all.

  • @NOREMACG1
    @NOREMACG1 Před 2 lety +4

    "For some reason I can't explain,
    Never an honest word but that was when I ruled the world"

  • @seanoliver1980
    @seanoliver1980 Před 2 lety +2

    Go Senator Hawley! Thank you for representing our great state of Missouri. Go fight for the Constitution! God Bless you sir for all your hard work you have done to protect our Country this year! We are watching and supporting you back home!

  • @rlb4592
    @rlb4592 Před 2 lety +52

    "Senator I will Gut every conservative I can"

  • @mr.invisible3770
    @mr.invisible3770 Před 2 lety +31

    Any politician who refuses to answer questions needs to be kicked out of the room immediately

    • @sociopathicnarcissist8810
      @sociopathicnarcissist8810 Před 2 lety

      um, she's nominating to be a Judge, not a Politician...

    • @mr.invisible3770
      @mr.invisible3770 Před 2 lety

      @@sociopathicnarcissist8810 whatever, she’s still a rotten hunt with a capitol C. And my point remains for all politicians. It’s okay to think ahead of your self.

    • @bish0p2004
      @bish0p2004 Před 2 lety

      @@sociopathicnarcissist8810 you're both wrong...she's an activist

  • @stclair4eva
    @stclair4eva Před 2 lety +6

    New drinking game.
    Every time she says "Uhhhhh, Senator"....
    Take a shot. How long until you're on the floor?

  • @CombatMonkey11B
    @CombatMonkey11B Před 2 lety +3

    The senators aren’t asking the questions right. They should say, “Just yes or no, nothing else because you’re eating my time.” When you dictate yes or no, then they can’t dance around the question.

    • @opinionated4219
      @opinionated4219 Před 2 lety

      OTOH, allowing her to ramble and dissemble gives us a good opportunity to see and hear just how awful she would be in the position.

  • @normapaulino2368
    @normapaulino2368 Před 2 lety +123

    Gosh, she keeps ducking his questions. I don't believe her.

    • @bobhager41
      @bobhager41 Před 2 lety +5

      These people will say whatever gets them confirmed. Once confirmed everything changes and the law is secondary over their activism

    • @timmythecat7478
      @timmythecat7478 Před 2 lety +3

      Exactly. INCONSISTENT AND UNCLEAR.

    • @shawnb1774
      @shawnb1774 Před 2 lety +1

      Using the lords name in vain.She is a godless socialist

  • @jedd.5407
    @jedd.5407 Před 2 lety +143

    “When someone lies to you, it’s because they don’t respect you enough to be honest, and they think you’re too stupid to know the difference.”

    • @scasny
      @scasny Před 2 lety +8

      this is how democrats talk under oath. If this talk have no legal consequences they will say the meanest thing a treat that hearing as a PR stunt.

  • @paulettecole9482
    @paulettecole9482 Před rokem +1

    First of all I would never vote for anyone that can't answer a yes or no question, period! I've been listening to these hearings and I don't know if any of these people have ever just said yes or no!

  • @rasalghul9331
    @rasalghul9331 Před 2 lety +1

    If she is this unwilling to be transparent about her position BEFORE she gets the gig, can you imagine how much she will do whatever the hell she wants AFTER she gets the gig as judge.

  • @basedcoins
    @basedcoins Před 2 lety +98

    Is there no other judge qualified that doesnt have a decade of partisan activism?
    Of course there are. Probably hundreds.

    • @twothreefour234
      @twothreefour234 Před 2 lety +8

      not what demonrats want. they want their crimes hidden byjudges.

    • @kathypriest95
      @kathypriest95 Před 2 lety

      It's sad, right? All I wanted in January was the truth. I don't ask a lot from the government and that's the problem. We didn't whine too long. We said eff th

  • @bgone4265
    @bgone4265 Před 2 lety +23

    ANY person who says they would quit their activism to become a Judge should NEVER be allowed on the bench.

  • @shawnmercercrain9727
    @shawnmercercrain9727 Před 2 lety +4

    Call your senators & representatives and tell them to vote NO on Perez!

  • @johnmartarello564
    @johnmartarello564 Před 2 lety +1

    excellent job sen. hawley, glad to see there still is people in politics with integrity.

  • @humilitysavestheworld118
    @humilitysavestheworld118 Před 2 lety +105

    The woman is HILARIOUS

    • @susang.6670
      @susang.6670 Před 2 lety +3

      I have to disagree. I think she's HORRIFIC!

  • @chanie8846
    @chanie8846 Před 2 lety +93

    I'm glad she is there so people can see what Biden and Harris are doing to out country

  • @remrocket2885
    @remrocket2885 Před 2 lety +2

    Awesome job Mr. Hawley!
    Once an activist, ALWAYS an activist. We all should vote our conscience and she has; the records show this! Thank the Lord that we can “fact check” her stances and voting records” Next nominee!!

  • @seaskimmer9071
    @seaskimmer9071 Před 2 lety +1

    How in hell does a person who has NEVER SERVED AS A JUDGE get nominated to the U.S. Court of Appeals??? If her utter lack of experience doesn't disqualify her, then her absolute refusal to answer questions absolutely should.

  • @snowbird4532
    @snowbird4532 Před 2 lety +37

    By her saying I am an academic is enough to say she thinks she is above everyone else and she is no good to be a judge. Good call hawley

  • @danielneece6404
    @danielneece6404 Před 2 lety +37

    If you watch her eyes you can tell when she’s lying.

    • @ricsmith2185
      @ricsmith2185 Před 2 lety +1

      If you watch her mouth you can tell when she is lying ...
      .. It's whenever her mouth is moving!!

  • @lilliankrajenka8713
    @lilliankrajenka8713 Před 2 lety +3

    Josh Hawley, you ROCK ❣️

  • @tminus1019
    @tminus1019 Před 2 lety

    Busted! That was pretty slick of Hawley. She walked right into it.

  • @lward9675
    @lward9675 Před 2 lety +43

    If they refuse to answer just don't let them in!

    • @geraldjosserand4321
      @geraldjosserand4321 Před 2 lety

      Amy Barrett was elected to the supreme Court she too refusing answer questions but said she must apply it according to the law every judge on the supreme Court or just a normal judge has opinions but when it comes to the law they must apply it according by law the verse in the Bible oh that's Bible again obedient is better than sacrifice a obedience is not based on how I feel is right our or wrong I must obey stop signs are part of the law you must stop before you go policeman see you go by he can't say it's okay you didn't want to stop he has to pull you over and give you a ticket you might have to get to the hospital I guarantee you that cop would understand but he still required by law to give you a ticket quit looking at them being Democrats are Republicans there are human beings making decisions on how they see the law is to be applied because when you go before a judge you don't know if Democrat or Republican even you know the policeman is Democratic Republic or do you even know the lawyer was defending you is Democrat or Republican the only thing you can tell is there a man or woman

  • @cliffart7398
    @cliffart7398 Před 2 lety +485

    so she basically is a horrible lawyer who lands on the wrong side of legal issues on a regular basis. Why do we want her on the appellate bench?

    • @miraclelove991
      @miraclelove991 Před 2 lety +12

      President Soro want her to further push their agenda for open border non citizens. They will voting without citizenship, let alone voter id.

    • @debraann8412
      @debraann8412 Před 2 lety +7

      “We” don’t, but those who hate out Constitution do.

    • @AlexA-ss4te
      @AlexA-ss4te Před 2 lety +8

      We don't. Obama does.

    • @bigsparky8888
      @bigsparky8888 Před 2 lety +6

      BIDEN AND ALL CRONIES DO...PATRIOT FREEDOM LOVING AMERICANS DO N O T !!!!

    • @chookgoo77
      @chookgoo77 Před 2 lety +6

      Most of us don't but radical left liberal democrat administration and followers do...

  • @JXS63J
    @JXS63J Před 2 lety +1

    You see, this is why I am best NOT a member of Congress. By the time I was through with Ms Perez, she would be in tears, and most likely suing me.

  • @classicrock9262
    @classicrock9262 Před 2 lety

    The questions are crystal clear, ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!!!!!

  • @larrystone9474
    @larrystone9474 Před 2 lety +68

    There is only one reason for a nominee to give evasive, non responsive 'answers' to questions. They realize if they are open and honest they will not be confirmed.
    This nominee has consistently applied that 'strategy with every republican member of congress that has questioned her.

  • @gailmorra
    @gailmorra Před 2 lety +134

    She obviously has money and ties to even be sitting there.

    • @WyattRyeSway
      @WyattRyeSway Před 2 lety +5

      She worked for an activist firm that helped Dick Durbin write a bill he proposed. Yes, she’s very well connected.

  • @yukyukyuk1335
    @yukyukyuk1335 Před 2 lety +10

    All praise to Josh Hawley. He has integrity.

  • @micheletuddles8018
    @micheletuddles8018 Před 2 lety +66

    She will be totally unfair and change the laws

  • @yeascentdiep7987
    @yeascentdiep7987 Před 2 lety +71

    🤔 Yes, We The People have to carefully choose the right people who are constitutionally correct, not partisan to bully the people. Thanks, Sen. Josh Hawley! 😘🇺🇸🐘✊

  • @str8up598
    @str8up598 Před 2 lety +1

    She is not going to be honest about any question.

  • @BrownInfantry385
    @BrownInfantry385 Před 2 lety +1

    That’s a big NO !

  • @colinhalliley111
    @colinhalliley111 Před 2 lety +33

    Hawley doesn't suffer fools lightly . And Senator Kennedy, he is a no nonsense man.

  • @tomadams4973
    @tomadams4973 Před 2 lety +109

    a broken record, “senator, i would apply without reservation”.

  • @Muggins1dog
    @Muggins1dog Před 2 lety +4

    Every statement starts with "senator". She skirts every issue. She doesn't answer anything that is relevant. She is awfUL

  • @switchtalent123
    @switchtalent123 Před 2 lety +1

    Can I be a federal judge if I can answer simple questions?

  • @monicavanopdurp9853
    @monicavanopdurp9853 Před 2 lety +209

    She'll "apply the law" according to her activism. She straight face lies!!!!!

    • @MrSamialbeik
      @MrSamialbeik Před 2 lety

      Then you must love her … i know another straight Face liar that you love: Donald j. Trump

    • @JdoubleU1222
      @JdoubleU1222 Před 2 lety +4

      @@MrSamialbeik Sadly for you, you were lied to about President Trump and conservatives for years but you're too stupid to realize it. Good luck with your ignorance.

    • @JdoubleU1222
      @JdoubleU1222 Před 2 lety +5

      She'll apply the law of the land but when the chance comes along to change that law to fit her liberal agenda, she'll work toward that goal.

    • @r.m.5548
      @r.m.5548 Před 2 lety

      @@MrSamialbeik unfortunately you're too stupid to see you were lied to about Trump. It's very sad that you believed the lies.

    • @beno.9958
      @beno.9958 Před 2 lety +2

      @@MrSamialbeik The purported lies of President Trump are coming back to haunt the left it seems. Looks like they were the ones lying about the virus, the Russian collusion, the Biden's, pretty much everything. CNN, MSNBC, and the NYT are having to eat their words.

  • @evadudova7684
    @evadudova7684 Před 2 lety +82

    This woman is an emotionless robot.

    • @robertbrowne4049
      @robertbrowne4049 Před 2 lety +4

      Are you kidding she is seething underneath that “calm” demeanor. She is a zealot. Serial killers are really nice when you meet them they are charming I mean they only want to kill you.

  • @chottozumi
    @chottozumi Před 2 lety

    🤣 🤣 🤣 This "thing" again! Damn, she is good! CONFIRMED! 👍👍👍🤣🤣🤣

  • @computeracharya1419
    @computeracharya1419 Před 2 lety

    I need to see the face of her when he say I will not support u.

  • @beckymccormic
    @beckymccormic Před 2 lety +54

    No way she talks out of both sides of her mouth, common among liars.

  • @lagayames9034
    @lagayames9034 Před 2 lety +31

    She states "senator..." In a demeaning manner

  • @dominickmas2133
    @dominickmas2133 Před 2 lety

    The Truth, the whole Truth and nothing besides the Truth

  • @noteminemsburneraccount324
    @noteminemsburneraccount324 Před 10 měsíci

    Here we have somebody who wants to be a judge who would be upset if you openly refused to answer meanwhile doing that exact thing 🤷

  • @danielrose7536
    @danielrose7536 Před 2 lety +294

    We need judges to follow the constitution. Not their feelings.

    • @ME-xe4sk
      @ME-xe4sk Před 2 lety +3

      Sad to say those days are long gone.

    • @petergunn153
      @petergunn153 Před 2 lety

      She certainly doesn't think so! She is an activist who by in large NEVER follow the constitution and truly has no business in getting confirmed. Ms Perez couldn't even be confirmed as DOG CATCHER! There was no need for Senator Hawley to have to ask Ms Perez the very same question many times simply because she knows that she is an activist who would never follow the constitution. What she is I would call a disgrace to American law and jurisprudence! I concur with Senator Hawley's decision not to confirm her!

  • @roam4fun853
    @roam4fun853 Před 2 lety +99

    She’ll make a perfect addition to all the swamp monsters.

    • @petergunn153
      @petergunn153 Před 2 lety

      Indeed. Why? Because she is one of them. She would be with her own kind and rule against the rule of law! When you refuse to answer simple questions put forth to you, your hiding your judicial philosophy which spells Activism. Constitution be damned!

  • @starrpendergraft5420
    @starrpendergraft5420 Před 2 lety

    THANK YOU, Rep. Hawley.... GREAT JOB........I sincerely hope that Ms. Perez does not get any judgeship !

  • @sir.shmugly2921
    @sir.shmugly2921 Před 2 lety

    They always FAIL in directly answering any questions.

  • @gloriastanley2156
    @gloriastanley2156 Před 2 lety +70

    Traitor to America DO NOT ALLOW THIS PERSON IN OUR COURTS

  • @kathynoel9693
    @kathynoel9693 Před 2 lety +18

    She has her responses memorized!

  • @meagan6864
    @meagan6864 Před 2 lety +1

    Take a shot each time she says, 'apply without reservation.' 😄

  • @benkeel2966
    @benkeel2966 Před 2 lety

    There is absolutely no way this lady will enforce the "laws of the land" given her remarks.

  • @floaty02
    @floaty02 Před 2 lety +25

    Every time she lies she double-blinks. She’s an easy read. Watch her eyes.

  • @joywatkins4760
    @joywatkins4760 Před 2 lety +77

    SHE MUST HAVE BEEN A LAWYER FOR CRIMINALS DEFENSE.

    • @eleanormoran2168
      @eleanormoran2168 Před 2 lety +2

      She sounds programed !! Make them stick to answering the question. Sen., Kennedy is awesome at that. Dancing around thes serious questions just makes them look stupid !! ( I use the word stupid lightly) way beyound that.

    • @wesman7837
      @wesman7837 Před 2 lety +2

      Every single judicial nomination they have made were ALL CRIMINAL defense attorneys, and radical leftist Marxist SJW activist's!

  • @caenterprisellc6922
    @caenterprisellc6922 Před 2 lety

    Heartbeat on the words aside and constitution.

  • @thomasjackson7785
    @thomasjackson7785 Před 2 lety +1

    Answer the damn question!
    How hard is it?
    Representatives in many countries don't understand the basics of question and answer time.
    She should be sacked without delay.

  • @pastelblue426
    @pastelblue426 Před 2 lety +11

    Nope, nope, nope. Don’t trust her…..!

  • @funkytexan247
    @funkytexan247 Před 2 lety +29

    Ms. Perez claims to be an “advocate.” 😝

    • @kathyflorcruz552
      @kathyflorcruz552 Před 2 lety +1

      THEN she actually said if she gets the appointment she'll just stop all that.😂😂😂

    • @funkytexan247
      @funkytexan247 Před 2 lety

      @@kathyflorcruz552 yeah she did! _”Promises made. Promises broken.”_

  • @joefearnow2641
    @joefearnow2641 Před 2 lety

    No better example of "Evil comes with a smile"

  • @omni-archon4444
    @omni-archon4444 Před 2 lety +2

    Did she said "before my God " lol are you kidding me

  • @leslieackerman4189
    @leslieackerman4189 Před 2 lety +120

    “Under God?” What a hypocrite. And what people do to advance their careers.

    • @michaelantoniotti2738
      @michaelantoniotti2738 Před 2 lety +8

      I would have asked who her "god" is....the only one I would believe is Baal or Baphomet.

    • @justagurlsmith9902
      @justagurlsmith9902 Před 2 lety +1

      Yes. Josh Hawley is a hypocrite.

    • @idrathernotsay7823
      @idrathernotsay7823 Před 2 lety +8

      @@justagurlsmith9902 crawl back under

    • @jman1957
      @jman1957 Před 2 lety +2

      @@justagurlsmith9902 troll...

    • @sixpackbinky
      @sixpackbinky Před 2 lety +5

      These people don’t have the sense to fear the Lord. So being under oath means Nothing to them.