Karen Read Mistrial & SCOTUS Curbs Agency Power | Bloomberg Law

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 22. 08. 2024
  • Criminal law expert Daniel Medwed, a professor at Northeastern University Law School, discusses the mistrial in the case of Karen Read, who was accused of striking her Boston police officer boyfriend with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm. Administrative law expert Cary Coglianese, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, discusses the repercussions of the Supreme Court eliminating the Chevron doctrine. June Grasso hosts.
    See omnystudio.com/listener (omnystudio.com...) for privacy information.
    Host June Grasso speaks with prominent attorneys and legal scholars, analyzing major legal issues and cases in the news. The show examines all aspects of the legal profession, from intellectual property to criminal law, from bankruptcy to securities law, drawing on the deep research tools of BloombergLaw.com.
    Subscribe to Bloomberg Podcasts: bit.ly/Bloombe...
    Listen to more Bloomberg Law: • Bloomberg Law
    #Bloomberg #Podcast #Law
    Visit us: www.bloomberg....
    Follow Bloomberg Podcasts on Twitter: / podcasts
    Visit our other CZcams channels:
    Bloomberg Television: / @markets
    Bloomberg Originals: / bloomberg
    Quicktake: / @bloombergquicktake
    For coverage on news, markets and more: www.bloomberg.c...

Komentáře • 7

  • @rocketrider1405
    @rocketrider1405 Před měsícem +2

    Local/regional police were not sufficiently educated to conduct this investigation.

  • @cyndilagasse991
    @cyndilagasse991 Před měsícem

    lally spent 2 months defending against the cover up and zero days proving their case

  • @chrislim7615
    @chrislim7615 Před měsícem

    The truth will set Karen free*❤

  • @chrislim7615
    @chrislim7615 Před měsícem

    Wht abt the quick sale of the hse,with a:$50,000 discount!Then basement was renovated,pool(walls torn,carpet taken out)Dog re-homed,yeah*

  • @cyndilagasse991
    @cyndilagasse991 Před měsícem

    right wing supreme court needs replacing