Accused slain cop's girlfriend maintains innocence | Nightline
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 08. 2023
- Karen Read, the woman charged with killing Officer John O'Keefe in January 2022, speaks with "Nightline" and maintains she had no part in his death.
WATCH NIGHTLINE EPISODES:
abc.go.com/shows/nightline
ALSO AVAILABLE ON HULU: hulu.tv/2wSmSrZ
#nightline #murdermystery #crime #police #investigation #abcnews
I was Karen Read's hairdresser for several years. I can not believe that she is capable of hurting anyone. She's a sweet, kind, thoughtful, and generous woman. I am shocked to find out she's going through this. Karen, I'm praying for you! Maureen ❤
This is beautiful to hear ❤️ praying that John gets Justice somehow in all this mess that has been made
Have they asked you to be a character witness for her ? You should be. She needs all the help she can get. This case is so incredibly frustrating how important evidence was mishandled, thrown into red solo cups you drink in, put into stop and shop bags, and not into evidence marked bags. Someone could spend the rest of their life in jail for something they didn’t do. It’s just insane and sad that this is how they did their “investigation”
Lol she only decided she didn't hit him a year later...she did it and she's knows she did....
@@Tuesdaysdeadna Bang Bang Colin did.
💜💫 FREE KAREN READ 💫💜
Can we just take a moment to acknowledge how heartbreaking this is for his niece and nephew. Not only did they lose both parents ,now their uncle,who was their legal guardian 😢
Yes...por kids. Seems like there's a curse in their lives
And now also their uncle's girlfriend in jail and she was also a parental figure to the kids
@@m.g.7828she’s not in jail she’s been out on bond
@@Tammy_26Irwin accused of murdering their uncle, just as traumatic
Wow! She opened up the worms in her drunken life and Jealousy including her having slept with his friend!!
Nice to know the feds are investigating this whole case. That speaks volumes.
But the feds are dirty too!
If they had anything that would exonerate her, she wouldn't be on trial.
@@ElleJ-kx4hu there’s lots of exculpatory evidence that’s been hidden! The DA is in cahoots with the crooked cops. This is not new and blatantly obvious.
@@ElleJ-kx4huthey’re still investigating. The last twitter update from FBI agent that I saw on twitter said as much. I’ve heard that they had an initial hearing where they made clear their experts opinions on both self phone data (google search) as well as manner of death. Judge ruled that the FBI trial and findings cannot be used in this trial.
The MA state police are investigating. The FBI helped in certain areas.
The local prosecutor in this case sounds more like a defense attorney for other parties involved that night. Totally inappropriate.
How so? Because he’s doing his job arguing the evidence does not support Karen Reads creative defense stories?
@@cateellington4081 he hasnt done that at all. are you handicapped
He's also trying to shield them with office Victim's Advocate. They are witnessess.
Witnesses to what though?
@@cateellington4081 His "unprecedented" statement had no less than 5 outright lies and 3 completely inappropriate statements.
Imagine finding your boyfriend on the lawn of another Boston Policeman’s and no one from inside the home comes outside to see what’s going on. No one leaving that party hours earlier noticed him either, over 6 foot tall man on top of maybe an inch or two of snow at that point.
Exactly.
They were invited in the house for drinks!
People are too quick to judge! They have to know the whole story to make a judgement.
She is bold and carefully presenting herself; while her body language is not coordinating with her words.
She already said, she dated him in the past. He called her / message her as blast from the past.
What if he wanted to leave her again? there wasn't anything substantial he found in her; she is all over him in those pictures. She took care of his niece and nephew. Those things can give her entitlement issues. she went on and blamed the entire police department for it.
There is a simple rule when you go to party or dinner together, you leave together. In her madness, she may have hit him in the snow and left him there to die; later fabricated a plan to blame entire police department.
That is suspicious
@@MineMeMineMeMineMe I agree with your statement. She 'allegedly' took care of the children. If this in fact happened - there's been (most likely) a mutually beneficial arrangement between both parties. From my pov, her body language describes her as a very attention hungry, domineering, vengeful individual. He seemed to be more of a subdued individual.
I don’t believe in body language to the extent that a couple of you seemingly do. There’s certain times it can be helpful, and many times is interesting. But I will tell you that there’s been times, For example, that I have shook my head no when I verbally said yes, or vice versa. And I was literally just talking out loud to myself. I do that a lot. If I saw someone do that I would be suspicious they were lying. But my case I was answering questions along with some video or some thing, and I thought they were going to ask the question in the opposite way which would’ve made my answer yes, but they ask the differently which meant to be truthful I had to say no. But if you all were watching my body language you would be convinced I would lying.
I also think that people usually are mostly projecting confirmation bias when they look at body language. Maybe you’ve already made up your mind with other information you know about this case and so when you get new information it still doesn’t change your mind. I’ve done the same thing. That’s why they tell members of the jury not to State their opinion, because once you state your opinion it’s harder to change your mind later. Or maybe you know a woman or man, or the situation at hand, they remind you of some thing that happened in your past, so you’re more likely to be on one side or the other. And then subconsciously you look for ways to validate how you already felt either about this woman or the situation from your past. But people don’t realize they are doing it.
There's no way these injuries were caused by being struck by a car in a snowy driveway. She wouldn't have been able to get enough speed
There’s no way that you could possibly know that because you don’t know anything about accident reconstruction. I really find it laughable when random people say things like this when there’s LITERALLY NO WAY you can determine that from watching a video about a case.
@@DarkAngel71180 well I am in accident reconstruction and with the amount of snow that was on the street its physically impossible to leave those kinda marks on him with nothing wrong with her car, she would have some damage. We all saw the video of when she hit John's car that she had minimal damage. Those injuries on his arm are from Chloe
@@DarkAngel71180it’s called common sense
@@tatertotter808Exactly 🎯 #FreeKarenRead 🙏 #JusticeForJohnOkeefe
See what the Feds have found out and the autopsy report will hopefully shed light. Trying to remain impartial until the end of the case
4:04 per her .. he approached the door. So why would she question if she had possibly hit him? LYING!
She did not want John going into the house with Higgins in fear of him finding out she had indeed been hitting on him. They argued in the vehicle and John got out.. she kept moving the car forward away from the home and became increasingly agitated and concerned because he was going to go in anyways. She was pissed and reversed the car to go back towards to home to continue agruing with him to not go in and hit him.
@@drmikeforcynthiasullivan1457💯💯💯👀👂👍🏽
Hit by a car yet he looks like he went 10 rounds with Mike Tyson
Skull fracture will cause that due to pressure and bleeding.
There is no way in hell those injuries came from a car. That man was beaten and thrown into the snow.
I think the prosecution must be alleging Karen Read’s car has claws and teeth…😂😂😂
And bitten by the dog the owners of the house no longer have...
@@teemyoutube2066 💨🐕💨
Especially at 5 mph. Lmao
Sloppy coverup. More like a panic alert.
The woman that got up early to "help Karen find John" (a family member of those involved that was in the house) submitted a google search to find out how long it takes for a human to die in the cold several hours BEFORE John was found dying in the cold. She also informed a friend about John's death prior to her "helping" Karen find John's body...
Yes! How did Julie Albert know at 4:55 am he died when his body wasn’t discovered until 6 am. It’s so obvious any comment on this saying she is guilty is either one of them or someone who just watched this interview and hasn’t heard of this case yet.
that would be Jenn McCabe who did that
@@StephanieL.-rs2ulshe also googled it at 2:27 am and thought deleting it would make
It go away🤦♀️
But didn't Karen call her to help her look for him around this same time? Does it not make sense that she would be google that then if they think he's out in the cold without a coat like Karen says? And why did Karen not go directly back to the house she dropped him off at? Does that make sense to you?
And why would she need a couple of people to help her look for him? Did she need a couple of witnesses for when the body was found? "Oh, I must have hit him by mistake."
@@Paul-cj1wb nope. Jen McCabe googled it at 2:27 am and Karen called her a little before 5 am. Also look at Julie Alberts police statement she told them she received a call from Jen McCabe at 4:55 am telling her that “Johnny was dying” the reason is because they did it and are framing Karen.
This is the best defence team I've ever watched, and they're winning by miles and this law enforcement office is packed full of corruption, and they need to be punished accordingly?
Watching the trial... definitely a police cover up. I think the cops got in to a fight.. something happened in the house.. and they tossed him out. you mean to tell me, not one FIRST RESPONDER in the house didn't notice him on the grass!!!????
I think you're absolutely right!
Do you seriously think they would leave him in their own yard? Give me a break!
@jane6989 YES, I absolutely think they'd leave him in their own yard. It would be way too hard to take him anywhere else, In their drunken state, they put him on the lawn. That way, they could say they had nothing to do with it. It obviously worked in their favor as no one investigated inside of the house.
Nope
No wonder you guys ended up with trump as a president..
I feel really bad for the critical thinkers in your country...
Lots missed. Autopsy photos showing it couldn't have happened by her car, the car in police custody with hardly a scratch on it and Jen McCabe googling "Hos long to die in cold" 4 hours before John's body was found
Good job Karen #FreeKarenRead
Jenn McCabe is the leader of this cover up I believe.
Are you a forensic expert? Why can't Karen hire someone to do an independent autopsy on John's body?
@@dylandice4638It doesn't take an expert to research the extensive amount of evidence that proves Karen's innocence.
@@dylandice4638The prosecution has failed to release a ton of stuff to the defense. Do your research.
And from whom do you have all this evidence from? The defense? And didn't Karen call this Jen McCabe to help her look for him? Would she not be googling that if they think he's out in the cold some place? And why would Karen call a couple of people to "help her look for him," around the neighborhood rather than she herself first going directly back to the house she had dropped him off at? Did she need a couple of witnesses for when the body was found? "Oh, I must have hit him by mistake."
The injuries mentioned could have happened if a plow is out there plowing and the body is hidden by snow. A snow plow is very heavy and jagged from stones and other materials on roads and leaves scratches all over. Just look at a speed bump on a road that is regularly plowed and you can see them for yourself.
SO much is missing from this! How did John get the dog bites and scratches on his arm? NO Lexus bumper does that!!! The dog is now missing, the house sold without being processed. Those that think she did it need to see ALL the facts! FREE KAREN READ. JUSTICE FOR JOHN!
@@InLieuTubeit’s not cops and friends kill him in the house it’s a small group of friends and one happens to be a very well connected Boston Cop. From here he contacts all of his connections so the first cops to arrive to the scene are his friends. The lead detective on this case Michael Proctor is a long time family friend so he immediately went to work helping them to cover it up. The neighbor directly across the street (who just so happens to be the ex chief of canton police) had a ring camera set up which would perfectly capture Brian alberts entire front yard/ house claimed his ring camera picked nothing up. He was coincidentally also good friends with Brian Albert. It should have picked up whatever happened whether it was Canton Cover Up Crew or Karen. If they had ring footage of Karen running him over obviously they would give it up. Proctor never sought this footage. He took the guys words for it. They didn’t ask any other neighbor for their ring camera footage and they deleted 2 minutes of the library camera footage that would have coincidentally exonerated Karen by showing that her taillight was in tact driving home from dropping him off. It sounds like a drama from a lifetime movie until you dig into the facts of the case and realize the connections and how deeply deeply corrupt these people are. Go to Turtleboy Daily News. He has over 100 blogs on this all of his information is well sourced and vetted and he brings all the receipts.
@@InLieuTubealso what they can’t answer is how every single witness left the house that night and failed to see a dead body. Or how the snow plow that drove by 3 times that night also said there was no body, he was found 12 feet from the road there’s no way to miss a 215 lb body laying in the front yard near the road.
@@InLieuTube So, based on what is known in this case, the theory of a Police cover up is laid out John O"Keefe had prior issues with Colin Albert, John goes to 34 Fairview, home to BPD Sgt Brian Albert (colins uncle), Karen drops him off then pulls forward to let vehicle there to pick up Julie Nagle pull in. At some point John is involved in a fight and later dumped on the lawn in vicinity of where Karen had pulled up. John has wounds to right eye, left side of nose, gash to back of his head, missing a sneaker. Inside the home was an ATF agent who works at Canton PD, another Albert also works at Canton PD. Investigating Officers never checked for ring camera footage from houses facing the way Karen drove, instead they looked in other direction. Footage from Canton Library ( 2 min worth) mysteriously missing. High ranking Canton cop lives across street yet his ring picked up nothing. A drunk ATF agent leaves the house and punches in at Canton PD , everyone named in reports are all related or life long friends! the Alberts make the dog disappear, rip up and replace cellar floor, and sold the house for below market value. oh, and how does a Police Sgt or any of his family NOT go outside to see wtf is going on???
@@InLieuTubeother people addressed the ring camera footage. As for your point of why he was dumped on the front lawn. O'Keefe was killed in a fight, it wasn't planned or premeditated. Now if they make the body disappear, that house is the last place O'Keefe was scene. That house will be inspected for DNA and blood. So instead they dumped the body outside and used connections with the mass police to steer the investigation in another direction.
@@InLieuTube correct. To make it even worse, the eyewitnesses told Proctor which direction she left in and he interviewed several neighbors going in the opposite direction only to ensure he could write in the report he spoke to neighbors, but nobody’s cameras had anything. That’s one of the maddening and telling parts of all of this. Clearly nowadays everything is captured on peoples security cameras, its utterly impossible to get away with a crime. They couldn’t find one camera that captured anything? No way. But the footage would’ve exonerated her so they couldn’t have that.
9 drinks at 98 lbs. She was drunk as a skunk.
She is very lucky to be able to afford these amazing attorneys. If she had a public defender, she would be in jail for life. So sad that in this country, an innocent person has to go broke to defend themselves in a case in which they are innocent. She needs to sue the Albert guy for wrongful death.
She is so guilty, No one could could see the Officer in the snow, logical, no fighting in the house!! Calling all those people proved nothing. Some happened from the bar to the house between the 2 of them. Can't stand mouth, she also snear. GUILTY!
@pennicochrane8886 lol wait until the defense brings in all the evidence FROM THE FBI who has been investigating the frame job by dirty cops and MSP for over 2 years.
Agree 100%
@@pennicochrane8886 Any chance we can explain how he got a black eye....from being hit on his arm by her car, at what would be less than 10 miles per hour?
@@glorygoma7182
Will leave it up to the Coroner to decide how it happened. Defense wants to blame the dog also. Defence is all over the place!!!
00:35 look at that arm and tell me a Lexus SUV did that. It didn’t. It was a German Shepherd who lived inside the house until they got rid of her afterwards.
What do you mean? I thought all Lexus’ came with teeth and claws on the back bumper 😂😂😂
@@mainejournalnews8737 that was only models produced in the 90’s. The modern day versions have elected to no longer have that commonly overlooked feature.
@@mainejournalnews8737😂😂😂
Those are gentle German shepherd bites 😳 they usually can bite straight through into bone. Was he practice for her?
@@mainejournalnews8737 😅
This video dosent even begin to touch on the corruption in this case. There is absolutely no way she could of done this by backing into him one time.
The autopsy photos ALONE prove this. There was no DNA skin blood hair found on the Lexus if she caused that much damage to him There definitely would of been DNA and blood on the back of that car. This poor women is being accused for something she obviously didn't do.
Free Karen Read!
Just because there’s broken plastic doesn’t mean it touched his skin. Plenty of documented cases where people get hit by cars and bruising, cuts and scraps under the clothing. If he was beaten his face has no broken nose, cheeks, jaw etc. Defensive wounds would be in his palms and fingers. He got hit then tumbled on pavement because of a belligerent drunk girlfriend.
He may have gotten bit by the dog first and then went outside and she hit him
I feel so bad for the O’Keefe family. The poor kids lost their parents and than their uncle. The parents lost their daughter and than their son. That is just horrible.
The truth is coming out. Hopefully, the O’Keefe family can get justice.
Ok my one question is if she saw him approaching the house why would she even question if she hit him? I don’t get it
Good question 🤔
Watch the trial.
Because she probably wondered my God was I so drunk that I like lost it last night? She was hysterical and in that moment that's why when you're hysterical you are never reasonable. The fact is the FBI has already confirmed his injuries are not from a car or an suv. His injuries are two black eyes, cut to the nose, blunt force trauma to the back of the head, and dog attack lacerations all over his arm. He went in that home and never came out alive
Remember, she saw him approaching the door and then she left. He did not go inside yet so it's possible he could have walked back out towards her and while she was backing up to leave hit him. But she didn't know I'm just saying to answer your question this is her line of thinking while in hysterics and just finding her beloved murdered
If you watch the trial, she had a texting cheating relationship with one of the men in the house, which also explains why she didn't want to enter the house, and encouraged John to also not go " why are we going there, are we welcome" etc. She likely said, I caused this, because she was in an emotional affair with a man inside of that house.
NO mention of the Google search "How Long to Die in Cold" from inside the house by Jen McCabe?????
N u wouldn't search that if your friend was missing in tge cold. Plz stop, that is tge dumbest comment I seen. N there's alot, I would, if my friend was missing n I knew w time I saw him last I would search that, any normal person would. Defense reaching at straws.
@@playarlz36lol okay that’s why the fbi just confirmed her google search
@@playarlz36genius, can you offer a reasonable justifiable reason as to why she'd think he was dead??
@pistolpete8231 did she Google search he is dead. No idiot, she searched how long so they know how long they have to find him before he dies. God think before you respond, n every good person out there would do the same.
@playarlz36 hey pea brain...take about 5 minutes to SLOWLY re-read what I wrote.
I simply asked why she'd THINK he was dead in the 1st place to get the idea to make that google search. Where did I say "she googled he was dead"? I'm not sure if it's the ketamine or meth, but you're not as smart as you think.
There are many holes in this case and all indications lead to a cover-up...keep banging that keyboard though.
This interview barely scratched the surface on the evidence that the defense has to support Karen's innocence. I can't wait to see justice served. #freekarenread
Me either, i extensively go over this case on my channel. Filings, evidence ect. Small videos like this dont really tell ppl much.
Lmao. She couldn’t get a hold of him so she went home and went to bed…😂😂😂 Needs the death penalty
So he goes inside the apartment, she tries to call on his cell phone, he doesn’t answer and she drives home and goes to bed? This seems reasonable to you?
This is so implausible as to be wholly unbelievable.
This is a very very biased interview
@@dkerr6449 first of all, what apartment are you even talking about? It’s obvious you don’t know the facts here 🤔
How is evidence of a crime on a front lawn with no motive or murder weapon NOT probable cause to search the residence? This is before Karen was even believed to be a suspect. How is a dead body on a front lawn not probable cause to search the residence?
At 9am, the crime scene was still an open and active investigation - but the house wasn't searched? What? Why? How?
Especially since the people in the house were with him the night before and were all friends.. the cops that showed up that morning knew this because they’re in the friend group! Something doesn’t sit right about it!
Interesting point. I haven't read anyone else asking this question. KR was arrested a few days later without the police doing a full investigation.
The cops went in the house and interviewed the homeowners the morning John was found.
@@dawnmills6755 please educate yourself before making a comment. The home was not searched. A conversation in the foyer with good boy Officer Lank lifelong friend is not due diligence in a murder investigation. The entire property was a crime scene, and was NOT treated as such.
Witnesses were not separated, the scene was not secured, evidence was not preserved, interviews were not recorded, the house was not searched, the camera used to take the photos of the front lawn was lost, witnesses names were intentionally spelled wrong/left out of the police report, red solo cups were used to collect blood, a leaf blower was used to blow snow around…
Not saying she did it. But she is not being totally honest. Definitely lying about the amount of alcohol she consumed and who would leave their boyfriend/girlfriend , Aftee waiting ten minutes. Then go home and call them repeatedly. Would've just stayed there. And probably walked up to the house and said tell my boyfriend he better hurry up.
Four strong drinks is a lot for a 120 pound woman….
I think she knew she hit him and went home in a panic waited a few hours then called friends to help her “ find” him. She took them straight to the body! Otherwise she would have just gone home and passed out from all the alcohol. I think she’s very clever
@@StephSilva-qw1lm that would be a good conclusion to reach if it was for the evidence that shows that the injuries to his body are in no way consistent with getting hit by a car. In the trial right now the defense has an expert medical examiner who has done thousands of autopsies and he is going to testify that his injuries are in no way consistent with a car accident. We can speculate all we want but that is kind of a huge plot hole. Even before this I thought, if he was hit by a car you would expect he abdomen to be bruised, ribs broken, pelvis broken, legs broken or injuries, basically places where a bumper (which is the first point of contact when a car backs into something) would hit someone. Instead we see no injuries on his lower body or abdomen and an injury on his arm and head.
She didn’t “leave him”, the agreement was that he would text her when he got inside, he never texted her so she just left. Kind of different than straight up leaving someone. She didn’t go home and just start calling either, she called once the early hours of the morning came and she figured he should be back by then. She might be lying about the alchohol she drunk but why wouldn’t she? The alcohol is the only thing that causes some doubt in this situation but that’s only excluding all of the evidence that works in her favor and the medical examiner testifying that his injuries in no way correlate to a car accident.
I guess we will see when ME takes the stand
If you're not going to tell the whole story, why bother. State is wasting their time trying to convince the court of Karen's guilt, meanwhile the real murderer is off living life. I pray Karen gets her life back soon and that justice will be served for those actually responsible.
It was a weak interview by ABC.
The cop already sold jis house , hus his assets, ready to go ""ON THE LAMB WITH ALL HIS BAGS OF DOPE HE GOT 4 FREE ,RAIDING GANG DEALERS.. THE SISTER IN LAW FRAMED HER WITH THE TAILIGHT AND GLASS EVIDENCE.. TJATS Y SHE WENT OVER TO HIS HOUSR.. KAREN WAS AT HIS JOUSE BCUZ HE DIDNT RESPOND TO Baby SITTER, so karen went ovrr there to relieve the sitter with the kids... after she hot thrm ready and off yo school, thoseb2 lying beatches showed up.. to frame her with evudense and tell cops that she said/ did things, to get the story rolling... tjst womanvwas protecting her husband and brother in law... karen said they r all family..
I agree they did a 9 minute show on this. So many more important things to bring up.
She’s the killer. Lol.
@@stevenprice6957Tabloid reporter. Sensational news. 🙄
Look at autopsy photos before making a judgement. Tells entire story. Also, left out the fact Albert’s and protors are close family friends
And Brian Albert is a dirty cop🤷🏾
No way those injuries were caused by Karen's car!!!
Don’t believe your lying eyes and ears 😜
@@superjuls69 100% injuries not caused by any car.
@@wishboneman right, don’t believe your lying eyes and ears
Oh yes they were. Guilty.
@@AmandaPanda-nq1do very convincing. As much as that mirrored video.
If she saw John walk inside Brian’s home, why would she wonder if she hit him or not? If Brian killed John, why would he dump his body right outside his house? What was his plan exactly?
@@RationalNon-conformistyeah but wouldn’t they try to move his body further from the house then? Like closer to the road? It doesn’t make sense to just leave his body basically at their own lawn
Because she has drunk, hit him, and drove off.
@@realresident1890you an officer for canton PD?
Because she didn’t want to harm him in anyway. It’s a concern by a person that loves him.
I would have to have the same questions as you but at the same time I feel this lady Jen helped her idk somethings seems off about them but i have no doubt Karen participated because she just lied and said she had 4 drinks but it was proven from footage it was 7-9. Also why say did i hit him ? The fact you have to ask yourself that is scary
This video misses the most important piece of evidence. One of the people in the house that night googled “hos long to die in cold?” at 2:27am. Long before they should have been aware that anything was wrong. Also, the plow driver that night reports that he saw no body on the lawn that night and would have noticed if one was there. The prosecution’s case only sounds reasonable until you start digging into the details.
Or the multiple people who left the party around 1:30am or Matt McCabe looking out the window to see tire tracks but not a 200lb dying man
czcams.com/video/XzRRNcStm4k/video.htmlsi=lKIza03kHjDXJM2c
Why can’t anyone spell how anymore ????? It’s a lost art I guess
@@THEBIGLIE20forgive me for my ignorance, my English is not the best. But may I ask what you are talking about? Or what you mean by your comment?
@@THEBIGLIE20 they do this because that is how Jen McCabe typed “How long to die in cold” to do her Google search at 227am several hours before John O’Keefe was found dead outside on Boston cop, Brian Albert’s front lawn. It was obviously a typo at the time but I think we all know exactly what she meant and that she was searching for this answer during the making of the plan to cover up the murder.
Every interview should begin with showing his autopsy photos & the Cellebrite data of a search by a “witness” of “Hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am.
Why is the data from cellphone forensics NOT reliable in this case but is 100% in the Brian Walshe case?
The data shows it was searched at the time the body was found. That will be shown in court. The defence are making it up as they go. They are doing a trial by media.
She is very believable, relatable. Her accusers, not so much.
“Tell them that guy never came inside the house”
Yes those autopsy photos say it all there was a brawl in that home!
no coroner or expert would ever attribute the injuries to a slow moving car in a winter storm unless they are also corrupt
@@tkx7 slow moving? you got the exact speed or youre just making evidences?
EXACTLY! My knuckles would look the same after I got into fights in high school!
@@enzoinfinity1 24
@@enzoinfinity1well isnt the commonwealth saying she was going 24 mph in reverse when she hit him?
The fact that the defense is the one fighting for all the evidence to be on the table speaks volumes. I knew Karen was innocent as soon as I saw that someone in the house Googled " how long to die in cold" at 227 am. John wasn't found until 6 am
And prosecutors requested a gag order on the defense. Never happens that way - usually the other was around. Super shady
Where are you getting this info that someone googled that at 227am? Where is that an actual fact. I would love to know so I can see it. Not from an internet conspiracy theorist, but from actual phone or google record that can be admitted into evidence.
@@Paul-cj1wb celebrite data extraction from McCabes phone. There is a report submitted in the court docs
@@Paul-cj1wbDude you need to keep up. If you haven't seen that then you're not paying attention.
It isn’t a fact that she did it at 2:27. You are just parroting what Turtleboy says. What the prosecution believes is that the browser session was opened at 2:27 and never closed until after she searched it at around 6am.
if she saw him going up the driveway while dropping him off and then left, why would she ever have to say "Did I hit him?"
Because she's a liar?
Its nervous mutterings of someone that just found their loved one dead and she was also drunk. The evidence speaks for itself and if you can't see that then you are just as horrible as the ones covering his unfortunate murder.
Because Jen put an earworm in her mind, and Karen was in shock and desperately trying to make sense of how it happened. Most people don't immediately jump to "his friends murdered him and dumped his body"; they think it must have been a horrible accident first even if it doesn't make sense.
People say all sorts of things when they're in shock. Use your brain, man.
Thank you
4:14 I honestly don’t understand why she would get up in the pitch dark during a blizzard to drive around looking for John… as far as she knew he was at Brian Albert’s house, probably got totally shitfaced and passed out on a couch… why would she think anything else? Why would she be driving around looking for him in a blizzard? That doesn’t make any sense. She knew she had dropped him off at a party with a fellow police officer that John greatly admired - she should have assumed John had the night of his life hanging out with his hero getting drunk and passing out…..
She got up because she knew she hit him with the vehicle.
Because she called him and he didn’t answer. She was worried. Moreover she dropped him off around 12am, late but acceptable for an after party. She woke up having not heard from him at all around 3am, excessively late to still be at someone’s house-these are 40+ year olds not frat kids.
How did she expect him to get home? She said that she waited while he walked up to a side door and because he didn’t call her she burn off and went home. They were supposed to be going over there together that doesn’t make sense. You can get all scuffed up from falling down on the ground, I have scars to prove it. If you hit with a car, you can get scratched up by the ground, depending on how it hits you yeah you can mess up your face. I have seen it. Her whole story doesn’t make sense and I just started following the trial.
@@TwistedTalesofTrueCrimethey live less than 3miles from the house. He’s a grownup, I’m sure she assumed he’d Uber or get a ride. I’d never expect my grown ass man to spend the night at another persons house when we live right down the street. Also he was found on the grass. She drives a huge Lexus SUV, he had no mid body damage, his eyes were blacked, swollen, knuckles bruised, a gash in the top of his head and his arm had not abrasions but deep cuts/marks…have you seen the scene? No way she hit him and caused those injuries on a man over 6ft tall with that car in that location…impossible
@@DamnitDana I was unaware of all those bruises. Especially on his knuckles this strange. I would expect bruises maybe on one side and if he kind of rolled over or something like that. I can see someone being hit and then crawling to the side, but those bruises are questionable. Especially the location. I’m going to continue to observe the trial. I’m glad that I had no real exposure before this. That way I can assess it from fresh eyes. Thank you for sharing.
NO ONE should make an assumption based on this ten minute segment. #FreeKarenRead
They say “a picture is worth a thousand words”. NO WORDS NEEDED AFTER VIEWING THESE PHOTOS.
Possibly was drunk and pissed off.
May have simply run over him accidentally….. or not.
Sounds hard to prove either way.
If she's lying, she's a psycho. If she's telling the truth then the real culprits are idiots. Why dump the body of your murder victim outside your home?
Where else would they put his body?? That’s actually a good way to get away with murder by saying he got hit by a car.
@@RationalNon-conformist- well not ten feet from the house they were partying in!! But being it was a house full of cops you would think they could come up with a better conspiracy than that!
wats her relationship with the attorney, all this “lateral” stuff is makin my head hurt
Lol I know!!
Why gather evidence in a used grocery bag and red solo cups? The real culprits ARE idiots.
Also ur plow truck driver didn’t see his body there when he 1st plowed the St. John had bite marks on his arm from their dog, his cell phone pinged in the house going upstairs and down stairs and at 230am someone from inside the house googled- how long does it take to die in the snow
Dog bites are puncture wounds not straight lacerations
@@StephSilva-qw1lm and there are no less than 20 puncture wounds on his right arm
Additionally the prosecution will not hand over any evidence the defense is asking for! Where is the library video? Where are John’s clothes? Their unwillingness to give these things over assures they are hiding something! #freekarenread
They gave the library video and guess what was missing? Two minutes of the video somehow disappeared. The two minute time frame that Karen would have been driving by with a tail light that wasn’t broken yet and would prove her innocence. Absolutely absurd case. They are all going down though the Feds are was too involved now.
@@Alienspecies635how did the feds get involved? It seems like they’re all trying to protect their own
Please explain what the library video is? I need to catch up.
@@slaws2279it would show it being towed with brake light intact, which another video did but John Procter apparently broke tail light and scattered this at the scene because then poof it was discovered.
@@keli449ohhh interesting. Thanks.
"Patron saint" eh....that ain't what you texted him that night
She has the shiftiest eyes, they're darting all over the place.
How are people like actually not believing that she didn't back into him or hit him? I don't know why people are so gung-ho for this lady. Maybe there's something I'm missing but it doesn't seem like it
Have you followed anything with this case? Literally every facet of the investigation was done improperly. no chain of custody of evidence, holes in police video, video deleted in police custody, multiple state witnesses deleting phone records, destroying their phones. The state's theory of the case is that she hit him going 20 miles an hour, and he was thrown 30 feet. Victim only has injuries in his head area. And on and on. The lead investigator declared Read guilty less than a day on the case. He's also personal friends with family memebers of the house the body was found at. Which was never searched. A body was found on the fornt lawn of a house, and it was NEVER searched! They also replaced the basement flooring right after this. I could go on and on and on about everything wrong with this case. It's quite literally the most insane trial I've ever seen. It has nothing to do with her at all, it's the state's actions that are making this a story.
This was a great interview but so many important details were missed! The people inside the house googled “hos long to die on cold”, the missing library footage, the location of his body…so many things!
The whole thing about the Google search may be a technical glitch based on what I saw on court TV.b
@@iMatti00yep
@@iMatti00 “May be a technical glitch”. Lemme guess….Coffinduper?
@@estrella5935ding, ding, ding. JC has been proven to be a mouthpiece for the prosecution. If the state has a poor enough case to enlist her, they should be charged!!!!
Why did Jen McCabe Google "How long to die in cold" at 2:27AM when no one knew John was missing (supposedly), and he (supposedly) never went into the house?
Let’s wait for the proof of when that was googled and by whom - at least if the time is not accurate, it could have been googled to work out how long he’d been lying there before being ‘found’ ….
Why you ask. ? Good question. Many witnesses have stated that Karen Read said to them, someone search how long does it take etc. this is while she is on top of the body. You’ll actually see that this is the fact of the matter. There’s a lot of made up garbage coming from her team. They have support so they are going with it. She admits to hitting him twice in the early stages. She admits after that to not remembering anything because she was too drunk. Now she remembers everything haha. Yeah right. Psycho woman
I want to believe her, but why did she leave him there? If you go into a house and disappear I’m not stepping foot off of that property until I find my loved one.
Exactly
That’s the part I don’t get and find hard to believe.
It was her boyfriend, not her husband or a child.
He wanted to go to the party, she didn't. She dropped him off there and went home.
@@pistolpete8231 He was 46 years old and he was invited in a bar to come over to Brian Alberts house but they didn't ask her explicitly, so Karen was not sure it was an extended invitation so that was the reason she drove off .. still hoping he called her to say he you are invited too so she was a bit frustrated about this too.. It's not nice to have to go home alone after an evening out!
Question: So this house was a cop’s house. Not just any cop. A local hero. No security cameras? I mean his job was to bust drug gang members. No security cameras on his house?
Honestly this interview makes it seem like Karen Read did it. However, they are leaving out A LOT of important information that show that she is indeed being used in a cover up.
You don’t know that.
My son was killed by a drunk driver. Since when did we start supporting and cheering for people who delibrately get behind the wheel of a car, drunk off their ass, without a care in the world. So drunk she didn't know what the hell she'd done. If she is going to lie about how many drinks she had... what else is she lying about. Drunks always lie about how much they have had to drink. God! It just makes me so mad! I miss my son. 💔
I think that drink limit on Read is here say. There was no blood test on Karen Read. Your perception is on information that was never confirmed. You’re ok with that? Was your son’s killer checked for this? If so, that is why you know. Don’t take your personal incident and plaster it on this one. You have no idea what the truth is here.
BTW, my brother died from alcohol poisoning at 27. I kinda of have an idea what alcohol can do to a family.
You haven’t looked at all at the facts of this case. This couldn’t be further from the truth and is completely inaccurate…I suggest you watch the trial…
I agree about the drunk driving…it is so irresponsible and can endanger others lives as well as their own. Nothing good happens with excessive drinking. I’m so sorry about your son. Drunk driving is horrible!
Agreed on drunk driving but doesn't make her a murderer. I am so sorry about your son. But please don't let that be a veil to let you not see the truth of this obvious cover up.
She starts off the interview with 'I saw him go in the side door of the house' then later wonders if she had capacitated him 🤷🏼♀️
She was frantic. Questioning herself! Couldn’t imagine what happened. She was brainstorming. You never said to yiurself “did I lock the door?” “Where’s my phone?” Did I put clothes in dryer!??
she seems excessively focused and shes putting her finger above her lip like that. i say shes guilty idk
@@amybeth9416💯✅
Why would she ask if she hit him if she saw him go into the house? Sorry, go up to the house, not in. B’cuz she was looking at her phone. Why would she leave him after waiting for 10 minutes? They must’ve killed him immediately. Her story doesn’t make any sense.
She hit him so hard that he ended up in the yard and the only damage was a broken BACK tail light? He had scratches on one arm, two black eyes , and a fractured skull. All from a woman backing up and a broken tail light? The prosecution is never going to get past the house not being searched.
Boom!
This story left out so many details. Anyone who has been following it knows she is 1 million percent innocent.
Funny, because her body language says she is a liar.
I think she did it 😅
@@billythekidder7182body language is pseudo science clown
@@billythekidder7182 No it doesn't. Where's you get this, one of the CZcams resident "Body Language Expert" channels? One of the biggest content scams going. Event the self proclaimed 'experts' can't say for sure that their made-up signs actually mean someone is lying or being deceptive. Get a grip on reality.
She did it and ya'll are stupid
If everyone that thinks she is guilty just looked at the evidence, you would realize she is INNOCENT #freekarenread
YOU HAVE NOT SEEN THE EVIDENCE IN CONTEXT.
The trial is still happening. I have not seen all of the evidence yet.
def 1000% NG
Why so many people saying not guilty??
evidence says NG
I don’t know. Evidence seems to point to her. I need to see the trial.
His cell pinged in the house 3 times
Why is the entire story not being told here??? Left out so many details.
Corruption all around!!!
Have doubts? Just google the autopsy pics. Anyone can see from the autopsy pics that an SUV did not cause the injuries to John''s body. He has dog bites and scratches to his arm! Karen is 100% Innocent!!
it was probably an accident, probably arguing and by accident hit him, and didn't realize till they got back to the house she had dropped him at
She didn't deny having 9 drinks at the bar.
Yes, she did. She told the interviewer in this video she had four drinks.
The injuries don’t match. No blood on her car!
The prosecution’s case is incoherent. It’s time for them to give it up and be prosecuted themselves. Everyone knows Karen is innocent. Anyone saying otherwise hasn’t been paying attention or is complicit. His injuries don’t match the prosecutions lie that he was hit by a car. Innocent people don’t replace their basement floors, abruptly sell their family home for $50k less than value during a sellers market, get rid of their dog and try to retire early. Innocent people come outside their house to see what’s going on when there is a dead body on their lawn. It is inexcusable that house wasn’t secured and investigated- IT WAS THE CRIME SCENE. Heads need to roll, and 💯 not Karen’s!!
not everyone
What was the motive for the Albert's to kill John? Your theory is absurd.
@@dawnmills6755 if you have to ask then you haven’t done any research into this case. What’s absurd is commenting things that are actually established facts are absurd theories. Do some research lady. Hope you and your loved ones never get framed for a murder you didn’t commit and have uninformed people celebrate it bc they can’t be bothered to learn.
@@StephanieL.-rs2ulI feel the same
@@dawnmills6755 Who said it was the Albert's? It could have been Higgins. Why do half the witnesses not remember his jeep there, but when questioned remember every little detail about Karen Reads vehicle. It could have been an unfortunate accident where a drunken fight ended up in a death, by anyone in the house. It could of been Colin also. Why did nobody mention that he was in the house until many months after? Why did they not interview half the people at the house that night until the FBI started investigating the investigation?
If the prosecution has so much evidence against her where is it?? 4 things out of 50 have been turned over to the defense.
Because the FBI has stepped in to assist Canton and State Police in the investigation and they are analyzing the evidence before it’s turned over to Read’s defense.
@@Q-ZOO this is 💯 not true. They haven’t stepped in to “help” them investigate. The FBI stepped in to investigate them and their corruption. Why would the FBI be investigating the same crime the MA state police is already investigating? Even if Karen Read did hit John with her car- and she didn’t- this wouldn’t be in FBI jurisdiction. But police and government corruption would be! 💡
Is that what the defence have said ? Lol. She’s a killer. She admitted to hitting him at the start then changed her story once she as charged.
1 of the 4 things they turned in was altered as well. A video with 2 minutes randomly deleted midway through. They are pulling fingernails to make her look guilty.
@@stevenprice6957nope. why do you lie?
Def set up.i think he was hurt in that house and placed outside,was the house ever searched or sprayed for blood splatter.poor kids have been through hell
The entire town, state police, a multitude of friends and relatives, are ALL in cahoots! Are you all crazy?
Never searched.
@@barbaramay1866 This is the 2nd time this has happened. As soon as this is over they're gonna move onto the next case where that young pregnant girl that hung herself on a door knob was a minor having sex with the 2 cop brothers.
Another theory floating around (armchair detectives only, that I know of) is that there may have been a fight in the house, & that John was trying to leave on his own & simply didn't make it very far. Meaning, someone broke it up- possibly saying he ought to just go now or whatever- so John took off injured on foot, possibly passed out/fell down on the spot at corner of yard. If only a couple people inside knew what happened- such as a fight in the basement, for instance- then it would have been easy to keep it quiet, whether they knew he had fallen down outside, or even if they thought he was trying to walk home from there. They were all admittedly intoxicated, which skews people's judgement, actions, recollection, etc. Would also potentially explain the 2:27 am google search for how long it takes to die in the cold, & why nobody else (supposedly) saw him out there, or claims not to have. Just another theory, not my opinion~ too many missing connections & details to weigh in on it, personally.
Really bizarre & scary~ most of all for the innocent children involved. My heart hurts terribly for his neice & nephew, they were just getting comfortable again after losing their mom & dad. They have suffered a whole lot of loss~ three parents basically, four if we count Karen, who had also become close to them at that point. They also have no clear accounting of what happened to their Uncle John that night, & they deserve justice as much as John O'Keefe does. Praying for all of the above, praying for Karen regardless of her involvement or not, and for all family members affected. Please Lord~ shine light on the entire, actual truth and cover the hurting with Your peace. They need You, we all need You.
Especially since her went in. She wasn't sure they were invited and didn't know them.
Funny in court a women at the bar said Jen McCabe said "You are coming with us" that sounds like a invite to the house on 34th
Why we're the marks on his arms not mentioned more? And then insinuated the glass theory again & brought up? Where is Chloe the dog? Why was the house sold so quickly? Why were so many of these questions not asked? And why was Proctor not mentioned making up lies? We need to know!!!
Why is all evidence pointing to her and people are ignoring it. Trying to find reasons of other instead of looking at the facts. Not fairy stories from a defence team. She said twice she hit him. She asked can someone google how long it takes someone to die in cold weather. That is why the search is there. The defence aren’t going to tell you that now are they. She changed her story multiple times. She’s full on with lies.
TB Daily News has complete and exclusive coverage of the case. This was a quick recap and doesn’t cover the most incriminating details of the coverup.
🐢🐢
First time i am seeing this case . This man was beaten, those injury is not indicative of a hit from a vehicle.
Karen: "I had told them I cracked my taillight" also Karen "I hit something with my car but I didn't look at the damage."
Karen: "I saw John at the door."
Also Karen: "I thought I might have unwittingly incapacitated him."
Karen: **Has 9 vodkas and lime, knows she is on video doing so, knows the Commonwealth has her BAC level from the next morning**
Also Karen: "I had four (drinks.)"
Karen: "I thought I could have unwittingly incapacitated him."
Interviewer: "Is it possible you hit him?:
Also Karen" "No not possible."
Apparently you haven't been paying attention to the case. She hit John's car backing out of the driveway. There's video that proves it. She never said she had 9 drinks and they absolutely do not have her on video drinking nine drinks you just made that up 😂 BAC level of .13 % is like 4 drinks if that
If you think she's guilty you are either ignorant or related to them.
Where is the dog!!!!
A dog attack would leave more injuries than that - the tyre of a heavy vehicle driven over his arm could make such creases of the skin.
Coincidentally they got a youth nothing next day. Their officers they know exactly how to get rid of evidence
and there’s conveniently missing library footage from their camera, his found hat has only been photographed, but never added into evidence, the Canton PD initial reports written on the very same day, had the initial crime scene pic replaced with the pic AFTER the taillight piece was planted on top of snow, and Brian Albert’s phone number was replaced/changed from the first report to the second altered report. Let’s not forget Jen McCabe’s 2:27 am search…”hos long to die in cold” either.
She’s guilty
Naw!!!!
Guilty of slumming it dating cops maybe. nothing more.
@@madprophetus nah she killed him
@@billd3060 nah no way. guilty looks like patton oswalt. dude killed his wife.
After reading all of the case material presented so far, there is no chance this goes to trial.
All of the prosecution's witnesses (LEO and otherwise) will be pleading the 5th.
You have NO IDEA what you're talking about.
This is completely irrational - A cover-up with multiple law enforcement agencies involved and dozens of officers involved? Seriously? The officers investigating the case didn't know John or the people inside that house. But somehow in the few hours after he was killed, they were able to persuade unknown investigatirs to cover this up???
And how did she go from him not being home to looking around in the snow? I don't think that I would jump to that conclusion - I would assume he's with someone somewhere in their house sleeping it off. You would think of who he can be with or whose house and how he got there. She knows she hit him - she knew and that's why she knew to look for him outside in the snow, otherwise she ou would call everyone and go to everyone homes, you wouldn't think of searching outside until later. And...why would the people inside the house have confronted him as soon as he entered the home? This defense is one of the most ridiculous I've heard. She hit him, she even even admitted to women she was with when she allegedly wondered out loud if she hit him. Again...why would she even think of saying she hit him if she hadn't hit him. That wouldn't have been a question in her mind
Dozens of officers involved? There was less than a half dozen that processed the scene, and they all knew who's house it was, and many of them knew who the victim was. As for actually processing the crime scene they did a completely despicable job. Also worth noting the only evidence they found after all the officers searched the area that day was a peice of a clear pint glass. It wasn't until days later an officer happened to be driving by and saw his missing shoe, his missing hat, and over 40 pieces of red taillight. How do 6 police officers search an area and come up with just a piece of glass, but not all the other things which would be easily seen in contrast with the snow?
@@JoexWalsh Because everything was covered in a blizzard of snow and things were revealed as the snow melted. Don't you get it?
The officer's knew each other
@@dawnmills6755 Don't you wish all murders had such a competent, professional, and non-biased investigators?! Can't see over 40 pieces of red tail light in white snow, but can find it in the grass days later, under where his body would have been. She must of hit him so hard that the tail light fragments when right through him without causing any exit wounds! Incredible! You are awfully dense my friend 🤣
Proctor is a family friend of the people in the house what are you talking about!?
She says she had “probably” 4 drinks . Translation: 8
When I say I've only had 4 drinks I'm usually 10 drinks in tbh
Vehicle did not cause those injuries.
This whole crowd are heavy drinkers. She stuttered in the interview and said she had about 4 drinks. And her response did appear to be based on drinks at the Waterfall. Prior to there, she was at another nearby bar and several people testified that she bought in a cocktail glass from the other bar. You don't do a move like that with only 1 drink in you; that's something someone would do after a couple of drinks. So in the course of say 4 hours of being out at bars, it's very possible she had a total of 8 to 9 drinks. So definitely not sober and not thinking totally straight.
JUST GOOGLE THE AUTOPSY PICTURES! Those Knuckle wounds were the Exact Same as mines whenever I got into a fight from 16-25 yrs old…Those are Defense Wounds!
I agree.. and the black eyes, he looks like he was beat up.
Right! His injuries were to his head and arm only. He didn't have any injuries on his chest, stomach, hips, thighs, lower legs, or on his feet. No way he was hit by a vehicle!
@@KayInMaine FBI already said %100 he wasn’t hit by a car
@TheShahofBaltimore yup and they're correct
She says it's "impossible" that she hit him with the car...
so why did she ask..if she hit him with the car? which she admits to asking "Did I hit him?"
So she certainly didn't think or believe it was impossible then, so why is it impossible now??
oh it's very possible to hit someone with a car when someone is over the legal limit that's the whole reason why it's illegal because people do hit people and other vehicles while driving under the influence.
She was intoxicated enough to hit his car in the driveway but not him???.. what are the odds that she hits her car on the very same night her boyfriend is killed and found in a situation that fits with how someone would be found after being struck by a car...
You would expect to find them on a road or just to the side of the road and that's exactly where he was found with his glass and straw.
Agree with your points, but I also wonder how he got a black eye, and nobody saw a human lying down in 1 or 2 inches of snow, and testimonies from other guests of no tail light damages from her car. How about cops at the scene who found "only few pieces of tail light glass", saw her car and never looked for other pieces until the snow melted later on? I will the investigation looks very shaky and leaves plenty of doubts. Let's not mention deleted messages and search from JEN's phone.
FBI confirmed just that..........car didn't hit him and he didn't hit the car.........case closed
@@bobbyswain7049 no they didn't if that had happened in a place called reality and not just in your fantasy world then the trial wouldn't have happened..Karen hit him.....case closed.
Karen is Innocent!!!! Something stinks in Canton.
Stinke...
The stink is Albers and McCabe.
She was 100% intoxicated and definitely shouldn't have been driving but she didn't kill him...
This is a lie. They never found taillight on the day of his death. 4 plus officers looking for them. This false reporting by the Da/Ada.
Why would she go out looking for him if she thought he was at his friends house? That doesn’t make any sense, she drove over there to see if she really did kill him, then had to play the “omg what happened”? Game
Would you go look for your boyfriend if he had not returned yet.
Ide be passed out from all the drinking
She woke up at 5 call her friends looking for John who does that ? He’s not a kid he could crush at the friends house, why she was so worried about him ? Because She’s left him to die after hitting him and she knows it!!!
I’m watching the trial now, and John Okeefe was not actually friends with the Alberts. Which is why Karen was confused about going to their house after leaving the bar
Because he wasn’t returning her texts and didn’t come home.
I want to believe her since cops are known to do this kind of stuff time and time again, but I can’t shake the fact that the simplest answer is the correct one in this case: they were both drunk, she hit him unwittingly and once she realized what she had done she panicked and constructed this theory to try and avoid owning up to what she did and also trying to avoid prison.
Exactly!
autopsy photos and the FBI disagree with your theory
Have you seen any of the evidence? Also, by your own admission you are saying she is not guilty of her most serious charge against. She is being charged with intentionally killing him, not unintentionally.
Ur the only one that thinks ur innocent. The evidence points right at you.
Do you still think this?
Nope wrong
Karen Read is clearly being framed. Thank you for taking the time to interview her & her attorneys, but there is so much more about this case to cover. Please continue to cover this story!!
@555KR • Framed by who? For what reasons? On what grounds? Nah she just thinks she can outsmart the system. 👎
She will be charged
6:02 sure... free kArEn lol. So much wrong with this presentation of the circumstances.
@@DEUTSCHLAND.007 Framed by the police officers who killed him. You should look into the case some more. There was A LOT of exonerating evidence that was left out of this video.
@@korbendallas7181 The is 0% chance she'll be convicted if it goes to trial.
WOW so his sister, and her husband passed away. The children had both parents die. So he steps up and becomes their adopted father... and then he dies. Those poor kids. Both of my parents died in my late teens, could not imagine dealing with that as a child.
She needs to soften up a little, rather than be angry and attack…currently the way she communicates is scary…and gives the impression that if you mess with her she’ll kill you.
Does not work in her favor
Wouldn't you be pissed if the entire police force is against you and you know that you didn't do anything it's an injustice I'm upset about it I'm not even her
Couldn’t disagree more. You must be a cop lol.
If you and your family had to live in hell for 27 months, I bet you’d be furious! How frustrating this must be for her, not to mention her losses. Karen never uses it as an excuse & rarely mention it, but she has MS which could affect her speech, facial expressions, gait, etc. Have some compassion!
Disagree. This is how people on the East coast talk.
It’s the accent. A lot of people talk that way
Clearly he looks like he was beaten to death. How the heck is medical examiner saying there is no evidence of him being beaten
When will the prosecution stop stalling and turn over and allow defense to test the 50+ pieces of evidence?
Why doesn’t the defense have the original (not amended) death certificate? His hat?
Photos of the scene at 6am?(None taken?)
Why was the ONLY first responder to be interviewed a family friend of the Alberts?
How did the 2-3 minutes of the Canton Library’s video that would show Karen driving home without a cracked taillight be the only portion deleted?
Why weren’t neighbors in the other direction asked for ring camera footage?
I’m glad this story is finally getting national attention since locally it is getting nothing from anybody but turtle boy. I do think they left the key points like what appears to be dog scratches and bites on John’s arm. How Brian Albert lost the dog soon after, sold his house at a $50,000 loss right after & how Jennifer McCabe googled how long to die in the cold. Hopefully more to come on a later show,
She hit him with her vehicle and left him to die and all this nonsense from Turtle Boy isn't going to get her off..
Who is Turtleboy? This "non sense" is coming from EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO THE COURT...Why is Brian Alberts AUNT THE JUDGE IN THE CASE?
But how did he get two black eyes and dog bites?
@@Justrelaxx101right? And why did Jenn McCabe, at 2:27 in the am, google how long it takes to die in the snow. And all the butt dials? While people were asleep? And answered those calls?
You're right.....the evidence will get her off!
@@deirdrecorey3876The judge is not his Aunt. Lmfao 😂 🙄
Why wouldn't she just assume that he stayed there, rather than instantly thinking he's out in the storm and why did she recruit 2 witnesses before just going back to the drop off point and knocking on their door?
She thought he was fooling around on her. And she did go out driving alone at first but went home after contacting McCabe who said she would meet her at John’s.
Because he had custody of his niece and nephew and had never stayed out all night before.
Idk I know I’m being judgemental but she does not come off as being genuine and sincere. I think she had at least some small part in it if not the entire thing
For anyone that needs more information on this case, turtleboy daily news has done a complete analysis of this case! Karen Read was set up by a clique of very influential people in a small town.
TB is the only media source who had investigated this case on depth! In fact, even more so than the authorities!
@@michelec1962 well, the authorities investigated themselves & found no wrong doing lol
This whole story reeks of corruption and retaliation!!
TB is also psychotic
So she did have 9 drinks god damn….
Stop being silly.
6:33 she says “ No! Not possible!” When asked if she could have hit him… but yet had just said she asked that herself! She had clearly asked “ Did I hit him?” So why the emphatic no when Matt asked her?
Jen has her hands EVERYWHERE in this case. Jen is the one who told Fire Figters Karen.
She doesn’t seem sad at all……she probably doesn’t even remember that night. 9 drinks for someone that size!
You kind of made a contradiction, if she was drunk and doesn’t remember, she definitely is filled with regret! Because she is sober now! She’s pissed! She cannot even grieve properly! I’d be pissed! And normally you don’t have defendants speak to the public. Also, we don’t know how many drinks she has had, pure speculation, they were also bar hopping, it wasn’t like the bartender at one bar counted the drinks, because she was BAR HOPPING. She is making sure Justice is served.
I've suffer a lot of lost in my life. It still makes me very sad at times. But I can tell people the stories without getting emotional or visibly sad.
@@JAJJABLOG No, it's you who are making contradictory statements. She "is filled with regret" and "she is pissed!" If she was BAR HOPPING, she had A LOT OF DRINKS! Probably to avoid being cut off.
@@priscillamichel4797very true. My some died in 2017. For years I couldn’t even talk about him without falling apart. Now, I’ve trained myself to block out all thoughts and emotions. People are so ridiculous judging other based only on their reactions. We are all different!!
This is an eye opener of how cops can look like the good guys but be corrupt. The wounds on him speak volumes. It screams beat up not hit by a car. The sister in law googled “how long does it take to die in the snow” Brian lied on stand and was caught in lies. He wasn’t making sense. An innocent person at first feels guilty that’s why she thought she hit him with her car while drunk. But realized that wasn’t the case. After the fight got out of hand and he was beaten to death, They knew she was drunk so they made it look like she hit him with her car. She was framed. And I know she’ll be set free.
They were all friends!!! There is absolutely no reason for them to kill him! The defence is doing a good job of convincing you and others. She is Shrewd and a tough cookie! He has nothing rlse
He has nothing else to use
Except the calls.
🚩🚩🚩 I just caught a HUGE hole in her story. “She then started canvassing the neighborhood.” Why wouldn’t she just go to the cop’s door, knock, and ask where he is?
She drove to the house and saw him in the snow
@@007bboxshe knew exactly where he was lol
I think because she called Jen, who was at the party and a friend of John’s, who stated he never showed up. Double check though. I listen to the trial every time they are in court and yet still seem to zone out and miss parts🤣
@@QueenofKings-mh7zn I just feel, the red flags from the start are, if you were dropping someone off at the get together, you’d either go in with them (unless there was an argument), or, you’d set up a time to pick them back up since he didn’t have a car to go home with. Plus, she knew where he was. You’d not wake up screaming that he wasn’t home yet. (Again) how would he get home without a car or a ride home? If I wasn’t getting him on his phone, I’d assume he was passed out on their sofa and wasn’t hearing it. I sure wouldn’t be calling Jen screaming bloody murder, I’d call her to get their phone number, or have Jen call them and ask them to have him call. After that, and then finding out he wasn’t there and he never came in, THAT is the time to panic, not before. She obviously knew she ran over him by stating (or even assuming) it. She went straight to him in the snow. He was so covered up (3-4 inches of snow), and being dark outside, there is no way she’d initially see him. I simply can’t believe alllllll of those people would be taking up for a teenager that supposedly hit him, or something. There’s just no way THAT many of them would. Maybe a few (the owners of the house and the brother), but not all. Maybe she didn’t hit him intentionally, but she 100% did. People say there’s no way he could have black eyes and scratches, but he could have been bending over by the taillight and bumper or wheel, or already fallen and was stumbling back up and hit because he was drunk and it was slick from the weather. Or, being mad and wanting out of the relationship, she could have intentionally hit him, people do all of the time. The courts are full of them. I think she realized he was using her to take care of his children as a babysitter, and she was already moving on to the new guy she was texting. She left him there to die, then headed home to come up with an excuse and a timeline to say she ‘happened’ to be looking down at her phone the very second he was supposedly at the door, so she assumed he went in. So ridiculous.
@@holylandfan3275 I’ve been trying to watch the trial. Like I said, I zone out and miss some. I’ve always felt that she’s guilty. That is one of the points that stood out to me. It’s possible that she was so drunk, hit him, fell asleep not aware that she hurt him so badly, woke up and vaguely recalled what she had done, immediately freaked out. I also believe her reaction to him not being home was over the top. The snow was not bad that morning. If you watch the dash cam video it wasn’t bad at all. The two things I’m waiting to hear about from the experts are: Jens search and if the time stamp can be explained and the information from Karen’s car. I do believe she will be found not guilty though. Not because she’s innocent but because the way the evidence was handled. I’ve never been a fan of trial by media. It’s an easy way to control the masses that wouldn’t know critical thinking if it slapped them in the face. We shall see! Glad I’m not totally alone!
Despite the fact that alot of detailed pieces are missing, I think it's a good interview for her. Reality is.... it's not going to matter. The driveway footage paired with prosecution statements exonerates her and proves police corruption.
You guys are acting like theres no way she was involved. She might not have killed him herself but she could've very well been involved.
yeah, those wounds on his wrist are far too distructive for someone like her but she couldve hit him with a rock or glass. so it is unknown
if you are watching the trial you know better