2 Khilafah of Yazīd : Karbalāʾ 1
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 01. 2020
- 2 Khilafah of Yazīd : Karbalāʾ 1 [كربلاء]
Send us a message! We are happy to address any questions or concerns you may have. Please be as detailed as possible so that we may better assist you. Or you can call us at 619-741-1955
Hope you will be benificail with this!
👉 If you love this video, please like and share it.
👉 Don't forget to subscribe to this channel for more update.
👉 Subscribe now: bit.ly/2vWqOaZ
💢💢 Watch our other video:
💟 Is The Bible The Word Of God?: • Is The Bible The Word ...
💟 Jummah Khutbah: What is the purpose of life?: • What is the purpose of...
💟 Fiqh of Fasting 1: • 38 Sharh Akhsar al-Muk...
💢💢 Stay with us:
💟 Facebook: / masjidribat
💟 Google Plus: plus.google.com/1114869460949...
💟 Personal Website: www.masjidribat.com/
💟 Email: info@fiqhlessons.com
#UthmanIbnFarooq #Islamicclasses #MasjidRibat
Thank you for watching this video, click the "SUBSCRIBE" button for stay connected with this channel.
Subscription Link: bit.ly/2vWqOaZ
Bayah to yezid was never valid since many senior Sahabis rejected him. Fighting yezid was the right thing to do. Ijtihad of Imam Hussein to resist the start of monarchy was the right thing.
Could you name some senior sahaba who rejected? I only know Husayn RA and Ibn Zubair RA didn't give allegiance
Most people had alrdy given bayah to yazid, there was no need to start a rebellion after 4 months. Hussain (Ra) didn't start any war, he was invited to kufa and he wanted to give bayyah directly to yazid. It was kufa people responsible for his death who invited him and turned against him making him look like a rebellion.
@@aldenpadilla1773 Hussein RA said NO to yezid making him incompetent. Majority vote does not legitimise a wrong decision to start a monarchy. Btw, Kufians rose up against the Omayyad dynasty as they had committed. They r known as the Tawwabeen.
You r right. Hussein didn't start any war. He was innocent. Kufa had every right to invite the great leader al Hussein to their city. Why? To enjoin the right and forbid the evil.
Who said that Hussein wanted to give Bayah? He asked to be taken to yezid,s palace. He was denied. But his sister Zainab filled in for her martyred brother when she put the omayyad royal to shame for their bloody deeds.
Watch a vid on the omayyad mosque asr azan.
@@ArifIKhan-gg6rx
Lmao 🤣. Nobody wants to watch kufian fantasy stories on CZcams.
Hussain (Ra) did say YES to yazid and wanted to give bayyah directly to him. His brother is the brother-in law to yazid and Muwaiya ra is a brother in-law to prohet. Yazid didn't start any monarchy just like Ali ra didn't start any monarchy after putting Hasan ra in power. Resisting Ali dynasty was the right thing to do by your logic (especially when Ali ra came to power after by rebels who assassinated uthman Ra)
We follow sahaba and scholars not fitnamakers. None of the scholars deemed yazid rule as illegitimate after Karbala incident, in fact scholars of all scholars made it very clear that going against yazid is the ultimate faithless thing you can do.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 9, Book 88, Number 227:
Narrated Nafi’:
When the people of Medina dethroned Yazeed bin Muawiya, Ibn ‘Umar gathered his special friends and children and said, “I heard the Prophet saying, ‘A flag will be fixed for every betrayer on the Day of Resurrection,’ and we have given the oath of allegiance to this person (Yazeed) in accordance with the conditions enjoined by Allah and His Apostle and I do not know of anything more faithless than fighting a person who has been given the oath of allegiance in accordance with the conditions enjoined by Allah and His Apostle , and if ever I learn that any person among you has agreed to dethrone Yazeed, by giving the oath of allegiance (to somebody else) then there will be separation between him and me.”
@@aldenpadilla1773 what is Lmao?
What's your evidence Hussein said Yes? If he had said yes, then yezid is guilty on 2 counts, according to your logic.
If Ali started a dynasty like muwayoyah, then it would be the right thing to resist him. History records what Ali said, "I don't advise you to appoint him or not appoint him as Caliph after me".
Alhamdulillah, Ali is to Nabi, like Haroon is to Musa.
Alhamdulillah, the Hassnain are Chiefs of All the youth in jannah.
May Allah have mercy on all the Sahabas, including those who were brutally butchered in Medina, by the psychopath.
We should certainly protest fitna makers. As you said, Hussein didn't start any war. So, obviously killer yezid was the fitna maker.
In the Damascus Omayyad mosque, at asr, 7 to 9 muazins make azan. Why? It was done by yezid after karbala. The blessed family of the Prophet gave a speech that put the "caliph" in his place. He wanted to create noise to distract audience. So he ordered a mixed up azan by several muazzins.
It's not a "stupid fairy story" like you rudely said. It's a sad story of the blessed family of the beloved Prophet OF ALLAH. PBUH. Hope you will at least respect that.
May Allah bless the entire Ummah in every place around the world, including Kufa and other than Kufa.
your speech goes to the hart directly , jazak allah khair
heart**
Had Iman Hussein not set out for Kufa, history would have accepted yezid and umayyad monarchy as legitimate. Thank Allah for the bravery of Imam Hussein and his family who gave their young lives to send a message of courage against wrong doing.
@Ex - Engineer Mirza Follower Umayyad was never meant to be a monarchy, thus it is invalid
So you Mr rafidha are happy that the kuffar of kufa betrayed and killed Hussain (r.a) as expected from a rafidha spamming nonsense.
1 one of the most authentic bayyan on a very fragile issue in Islamic History. Thank you sir.
how do you know its authentic? He didn't give any references
@sheikhmd.salman9692 because unlike your shia scholars everything sheikh uthman says is not from his own heart but he actually has knowledge
Jazakallah Sheikh ❤
Much respect for Sheikh Uthman.
Protests communicate the disagreement of the people with the policies of the government, who face periodic elections to remain in power. This is the system in our times. It gives leaders cause for thought when people feel strongly enough about something to protest. It is a practical measure in a time when political leadership is a career choice, and when people need to send a message. By discouraging protests we are encouraging people to quietly go about their daily lives instead.
JAZAKALLAH KHAIR
Please have this recorded in Urdu for benefit to the Info Pakistani community. جزاك الله خيرا وأحسن الجزاء
By the way i love these lectures about hussayn RA because i didnt know much about this at all
Historically Imam Hussein didn't make a mistake. He did the right thing to oppose yezid. It depends on your intention how you view Imam Hussein and his movement.
He was right to oppose yazid many people oppose yazid he was not right to trust kufans. By the time he find out what people were warning him about it was too late. Because kufans emotions was with husain a.s. and kufans wordly interest and sword was with yazid.
@@zmirac7652 yes, it was tragic. However, Kufans repented. The Tawwabeen movement proves that. Followed by the revolt of al Mukhtar al Thaqafi. I am not defending Kufans, because they repeated the same tragic betrayal during the revolt of Imam Zayd al shaheed.
Unbelievable this channel has so little subscribers and views. Lots of gems and wisdom in this channel. While other channels who promote faahishah have millions of views and subscribers. May Allaah subhaanahu wa ta'aala reward all of you brothers behind the scenes and our beloved shaykh. جزاك الله خيرا وسلام عليكم و رحمت الله و بركاته
Ya sheikh i love you for the good works you do. I know we do not criticize the Sahabih. Yazid was not a sahabi, The title of this should be the Mumliqat of Yazeed.
The Prophet pbuh said
The khilaafah after me in my Ummah will last for thirty years. Then there will be kingship after that.
Reported in the Musnad Imaam Ahmad, by at-Tirmidhi, Musnad Abi Ya'laa, and Ibn Hibbaan. Saheeh al-Jaami' as-Sagheer (no. 3341) declared Saheeh by Imaam al-Albaani (rahimahullaah).
He is a wahhabi brother
Dear Sheikh i have a few problems with your narration of the events.. each time you say Yazid didn't want bloodshed in the Ummah or He didn't want to kill members of Ahlul Bayt and the same for Ibn Ziyad.. but how do we know that their actions were intented to keep peace in the ummah and not to keep their dynasty Banu Ummayah in power. You make it look like both Yazid and Ibn Ziyad didn't want bloodshed and wanted unity in the ummah and yet don't question their intentions. What if all they wanted was to remain in power like every monarch does. And maybe that's what motivated their actions.
Also regarding Yazid having recieved bay'ah by most of the Ummah should be put under proper scrutiny. Muawiyah r.a was a King and not a Khalifa as he took the Khilafa from Hassan r.a. Khilafa never belongs to someone who craves for it. Anyway, so how do we know that the people who gave Bay'ah to Yazid in the time of Muawiyah r.a himself were not either coerced or simply didnt have any other choice. That would mean only Hussain r.a was on haqq. The logic that Yazid being the khalifa and so anyone else stirring up revolution would be a rebel including Hussain is flawed. Because the khilafah of Yazid itself is questionable.
I as a sunni do not care about Yazid. Hussain matters to me. No, Hussain wasnt starting a Fitna, he was trying to purify something that had been made impure.. the political system of Islam. He stood up to establish Khilafah on the lines of the Prophet's teachings. The same Khilafah whose restoration muslims are crying for today. Hussain r.a stood for haqq.
In Islaam, we do not assume people's intentions, as intentions are known to Allaah only. We only judge by what is apparent, having 'Husn udh dhann' meaning thinking good of people
@@abrarshahriarhossain5653 the quran says to literally call out tyrants. This whole charade of not doing anything is influence upon the deen by the deviants of bani israil and has nothing to do with sunnah
I agree. I respect Br. Uthman & have learned from him in the past, but disagree with a few of his points on his analysis here.
@@kataangsucksthe Quran calls out tyrants the way it does because Allah knows actions and inner intentions. We can only know actions and the sheikh did expose Yazeed’s crimes so what this person is asking, to call out his intentions, is beyond the prerogative of any human being and solely Allah’s right. W’Allahu A’lam
@@ahmedreads1794 wrong. He tried to make yazid look innocent and that muawiya and abu sufyan had zero planning involved.
Your reference is wrong. Hussain Ibn Ali would never give an option of giving Bayah to Yazid. If he was ready to give Bayah why would they kill him?
That's the thing right. Why would he do that. This means that we have been lied to. The wives of the prophet were under Yazeeds protection and they never protested his authority. Even in Shia books the relatives of Hussain actually never point a finger at yazeed, they solely blame the people of Kufa for Hussains shahadah.
May peace and blessing be upon Our beloved prophet Muhammad (s.a.w) and his beloved companions Hazrat Abu Baker Siddique (r.a), Hazrat Umar bin Khattab (r.a), Hazrat Usman bin Affan (r.a), Hazrat Ali ibn Talib(r.a) and all of Ahle Baith.. may Allah rabb ul Alameen bless whole of Ummat e Mohammadia.
Zero reference, loads of bullshit
May Allah grant them forgiveness to all of them
Jazakallohu khairan from Indonesia
Hussain Bin Ali Alai Hassalam gave his and hid fellow Muslim lives to show the ugly face of tyrant rulers.
Sheikh Abdallah S. Farsi says, on page 41, that one year after the invasion of Madina, Macca, too, was invaded. “Yazid’s army massacred many people and demolished Al Kaaba...” Here, too, Sheikh Abdallah’s narration is understated, though others have been more forthright. For instance, the same Ibn Kathir, on page 225, says that Yazid’s army “pelted Al Kaba with stones through the use of catapults and attacked it even with fire balls till its walls were set ablaze.” In Shadharaatudh Dhahab, Chapter Three, page 72, Ibnul Imaad Al Hanbali says that so much fire was used that “the entire building (Al Kaba) collapsed.”
This is what was meted out to “The House of Allah” which, according to the Holy Quran (Ch. 3: v 97), is a place where security is guaranteed to any one entering there, seeking refuge. This security was eliminated by Yazid. And this Yazid is the Amirul Mu’minin of the Wahabis who advocate that all Muslims, too, must view him as such! Subhaanallah!
In a nutshell, these are the evil deeds of Yazid. Let alone Amirul Mu’minin, would even a common Muslim dare commit such actions? Certainly not; then how come Yazid did so?
To address this question, it is essential to know what kind of a person Yazid was. Allah willing, we shall do that in our next chapter by quoting from the books of various Muslim scholars of high repute (none of whom is a Shia).
This Yazid is the same you’re calling RADI ALLAHOU ANHU (RA) he goes an blows up and attacks god’s house and god is going to be pleased with him? You better be kidding me 🤣
We as Ahlu sunnah doesn't praise him and doesn't speak ill about him(yazid ibn mu'awiyah)
@@khalilullah2911 shouldn't speak ill of anyone who is dead their case is with allah
When did you ever hear radi Allahu anhu being used for a non companion by a Sunni 😂😂 please stop
@@hamzakhairi4765according to Imam Hambal Yazeed is a Kaafir!!!
Brother Assalmoalaikum
Can you give the sources by which u r explaining the history of khilafat till these lectures.
jazakallah... it will be helpful....
Please give all the sources.. It will be kind of you..
he will never give it to you!!caz he got a thief in the heart
he is trying to say Hussain AS rebelled against Islam nauzubillah!
@MOHAMMAD jatoi he rebelled against the caliphate he fought for what he thought was right but at the end of the day Husayn was taking the caravan to kufa for active armed insurrection. Thats just the truth. Doesn't make him wrong imam Zayd also rebelled against the umayyads in his time
جزاك الله خيرا شيخ عثمان احبك في الله
احبك الله الذي احببتني فيه
Please also explain about the bayyah that was given to abdullah ibn al-zubair in makkah where as bayyah is for only khaleefah as mentioned @ 21:59.
Amazing story who are the Ravi of this narration .
Zakariya bin Yahya zareer and Khalid bin Abdullah AL khasri there is no other source for this story that you have narrated.
Unfortunately does not look like you have seen the books on ravis and what has been stated about these two narrators
Name of this Sheikh ? and where is he from ?
shaykh Uthman bin Faruk , he is a pashto raised in the US, Now he does a lotta da'ee works, i think u already know by now
When you say “it would have been better if they turned back” even though i myself say things like this sometimes. In the end we all should know that what ever happened was qadr Allah and it happened the way it was supposed to happen and that is the best and only way.
None the less i fully understand what u are trying to say but i also think we should avoid saying these things “if they did it this way then it would have been better”
Brother did a good lecture of falacies .!! Exactly as he wanted the audience to hear .
Why didn't this second bayah was to be stopped applied on muawwiyah then .....double standards
بارك الله فيك ❤
How come you called it "khilafah" of yazeed? Who Choose yazeed as a khalifah?
Sahabis
Don't idealize things, this is the problem here. Despite having a lot of good people, you will always have the viles as well. The rize of Imam Husein must be an example for any muslim, both shia and sunni.
You never agreed on Bayah and how it must be taken. Abubakr was chosen with one criteria, Umar with other, Uthman with other and Ali absolutely other way, and then people changed their Bayah. So, when it benefited people they would find criteria, if not, than they will just insist blindly stick to their own choice.
This khutbah has so many mistakes.. let me point out a few:
1. More than just "a few people" opposed the rule of Yazid, it was actually thousands
2. Not all the sahabah were good pious people that we can't question, stop making that assumption
3. Mukhtar al-thaqafi was a good person, stop using fabricated hadiths to make him look bad
4. Muawiyah was a horrible horrible person.. I don't even need to elaborate
I can go on and on, but wow, you really need to do your research lol..
you defiantly need to do research.
are you a Shia??
@@nasirabdiwahid2942 Try spelling definitely right first and I'll consider replying to you. Yikes buddy.
1. The vast majority accepted yazid to the point that Ibn Umar felt to reject him but decided not to as doing so would cause fitnah
2. Yes, but that does not make them kafir unless they explicitly say, then they wouldn't be considered sahaba
3. I don't know about this guy, I only know Ibn Hajar said in his biography that he became a madman and a liar. Allah a'lam
4. The prophet pbuh prayed for Mu'awiyah and made him a scribe to write down the Quran. If you truly believe this man was a hypocrite or kafir, you are saying the Quran is corrupted or the Prophet pbuh wasn't smart enough to notice his disbelief Authubillah. He has mistakes but that doesn't mean you should do takfir. He also had some good qualities and didn't want war and kept the land stable
mad shia lol
@@sy6553
Late to the reply, but
1- So Imam Hussain (as) was wrong not to give Baya to the Illegimate drunkard Yazid, who wasn't not even a caliph, but a Tyrant King.
2- They are not kaffirs, but It doesn't mean they were all noble people, as testified, in the Quran, in Surat Al Munafiqun.
3- Mukhtar may have had political interests, and he may have taken some things too far, but he avenged on what happened in Karbala, did he not? Even some of our Imams tak highly of him.
4- Muawiyah rebelled against the rightful Khalifa (as) did he not?
He had Abu Bakrs son, Muhammad ibn Abu Bakr (ra), who Imam Ali (as) appointed as governor of Egypt, murdered, as part of campaign to seize control of Egypt.
He launched raids into the rightful Islamic state, massacring innocent people, muslims and zimmis.
He usurped power from Imam Hasan (as) by force.
Tell me, what right had he to rebel against Imam Ali (as) and Imam Hasan (as)?
On one hand you claim to love Ali (as) and call him a rightly guided Khalifa. One the other you refuse to condemn his enemy, an open rebel.
How can you be so apologetic towards someone who fought and conspired to take the khalifate away from Imam Hasan (as), your own Prophet's (pbuh) grandson?
He was a traitor and a murderer of muslims, sahabis and tabaeen.
He ordered the cursing of Imam Ali (as), which shows us what kind of bile he had inside him.
This ignorant stooge is calling the the presence of Hussain Inbe Ali in Kofa as fitna.
Seriously the mental gymnastics he does in defending Yazid is pathetic. Questioning Imam Hussein's intentions is laughable as he was the grandson of the prophet 😂
Don't lie. He said quoting the opposing party.
The whole useless effort of this guy is to save Yazeed skin. Yazeed was not the lawful ruler. His govt was established by sword, even in the life of Ameer Muawiyah while he himself was a caliph. This guy is ignoring so many Sahi Ahadees.
Ziyad became tyrant during the time of Muawiya. He used to cut the hands of the Muawiya opponents and throw them in the market to teach the lesson to the other people. HIs Son Ubaidullah Ibne Ziyad was much worse than that.
You know better than the Sahaba? They pledged their allegiances to him.
@@j0kez708I know better then you youuseless twit go bugger off. All Sahabas weren’t created equal and they did not agree with each other. It’s like all brains aren’t created equal - yours is clearly less than mine and non existent useless idiot
@@j0kez708even your name is a joke
@@zehash So is your life. Oh wait, you don't have one....
@@j0kez708mate your mom didn’t say that
How is sheikh enjoying the death of Muslim at 47:50 mocking them and praising ubaydallah
45:12-47:31
"Real gems"
Alas, had muslims understood? ☹️😢
Slm
Please be honest in the site of the Almighty ALLAH.
When S Aisha R ask muawiya why he gave the ghilafat to his son yazied after he promised he wont give it to his family before he became the ghalifa.
Muawiya responce to S Aisha R was that it was an instruction of the Almighty ALLAH to him in a dream.
Astagafierullah
Yaa Allah.
On this alone i ask the question in the name of the Almighty ALLAH how truthful was Muawiya.
Listen to this dude at your peril , he creates his history .The Prophet clearly stated love Ali as Mawla and follow the Ahlulbayy , was this done , the sahabad were never mentioned , and Mawiya Yazid as sahabas as excellent ,wow . ..yazid , as amir ulmomini .this talibgivwill hoodwink you , watch Ammar Nakswsni for your better enlightenment
Yani imam saheb yani you can yani try not to say yani too much yani I hope you understand yani
He literally manipulated history in his own way
Maybe you don't know, but you are FED's.
You had to stop at the best part lol
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
Next week إن شاء الله
Jazak’Allah’Khair
@@fj1914 وإياكم
Where’s the next part!!!???
Wow. How he goes out of his way to whitewash the actions of the filthy Yazid. I'm not sure how to put this in a subtle manner... but it must be said. You really should go question your mother on her actions that have resulted in your heart and mind being so distorted and far from the truth and Haqq. May you be raised with Yazid when the hour comes...
Now he is mocking a Mufti for wearing sikver chains in the previous vdo he himself said that clothes or stuff doesn't matter..what matters is taqwa ...double standards
Ya Ali , Ya Hussein is not Shirk ,..invoking the blessed names of Ahlulbayt is asking Allah that with the Wasila of these blessed and most loved family of the Prophet , please make my request for your(Allah) forgiveness ,guidance, protection and blessings easier !
I guarantee this dude has not been to Karbala to understand the historical historical background and concepts , he is brainwashing his audience and creating his falcies .
Zero references - Lots of Bullshit
@Ex - Engineer Mirza Follower so funny … what a reply. Your kind of name reminds me of the CZcamsrs with the name “Ex-Muslim”.
@Ex - Engineer Mirza Follower Yazid ne waqia e harra par Madina k logo k sath jo kiya uske loye Rasulluah (pbuh) ki Lanat hain uss pe… To jo bhi bol raha hain Yazid k upar lanat karne wala Kafir hain wo Rasulluah(pbuh) ki kafir bol raha hain
@Ex - Engineer Mirza Follower Jo Rasullullah(sm) ko kaafir bole woh Kafir hain … main kafir o k moo nahi lagta
@Ex - Engineer Mirza Follower tere channel se kya ukhar liya tune 😂… 100 subscribers 😂 😂 😂… Tu hain wo miya wala… Maulana walo ki Lund moo mein lene wala
@Ex - Engineer Mirza Follower ye hi sochte reh ... Allah tujhe Yazeed k saath uthaye Akhirat mein .. or tune jo Rasulullah(sm) par kufar ka fatwa lagaya hain uske liye alag se hisab dena hoga ...
This clown has the numbers wrong!
It was Imam Al Hussain (a.s.) and his 72 companions which includes his family members.