Stanley Meyer High voltage hydrogen production video #3
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 11. 2013
- Working on hydrogen production by following Stanley Meyer's techniques. The best experiment showed 2kv at the cell. I can go higher but I need a higher voltage scope probe.
- Věda a technologie
Wow, I apologize for being so forthcoming, however, I must say i think you are a beautiful person and I am enamored with both youre handsomness and your interest in research and experimentation which I also have a passion for. I hope you figured out the correct protocol for this process by now. I am smitten.
best video ever !
from what ive read ya need a high frequency generator and a pwm... the idea is to bring the reaction to resonance...
I'm beginning to believe that resonance isn't required. The secret is "water capacitor" - you're just charging up a capacitor sort of like what Don Smith was doing. High frequency is required (around 20-30khz I believe) to charge the "water capacitor" to it's dielectric breakdown very quickly.
Well done David. Very good to see such intense upward spikes. Do you intend on gating your output?
Good work..
You can use voltage divider to measure higher voltages. It can be built easily by yourself.
Yeah just divide by 5 so you can get around 10000 volts. I have read stans went from 20000 to 100000 when he he needed to accelerate.
Nice post.. Thanks...
why is it you cant go 50v on your variac? I have same issue. I noticed I will burn out the bridge. now when I connect it in series the amperage drops considerable.
If I go over 50v on the variac, I start pushing to much current into the cell and I don't want to burn up the inductors. After I wind some new coils, I should be able to go higher. Connect your cells in series?
True. wire size on the inductor determines the current flow and that affects the heat. bigger wire less heat. we can further restrict amp flow connecting the cells in series, allowing the voltage to pass. it greatly reduces the current. have you tried connecting in series?
My cells are hooked up in series, this doesn't effect current much at the high voltages I am working with( 2volt drop per cell is nothing at 3000volts). The current flow in my set up is determined by inductive reactance, frequency and duty cycle. Resistance of the wire and impedance plays a much smaller role. Inductors resist changes in current by changing their magnetic field. On the on pulse, instead of passing current, they create a magnetic field. When the pulse switches off (50% duty cycle) The magnetic field collapses. So the inductor is always trying to maintain the current flow in the circuit. By switching the power on and off, current is restricted without consuming power in the form of heat like resistance or impedance.This is how current is restricted in Meyers circuits. Also, when the magnetic field collapses on off pulses, it produces a voltage spike.
David Bixler Good stuff David. I know a lot of people on a lot of forums that might actually learn something if they watch your videos. That is, If they ever put their brains in gear!
david whats your latest please supply your schematic to Pritam1@hotmail.co.uk
Dude you are a "dead ringer" for Shia Labeouf!!!
Your input power is 25Watts right (50v @ 0.5a).Your frequency at 120Hz, through an SCR circuit or what? After you pulse your cores, doesn't it give you a sine wave? How come you have gas production on AC?
its .5 amp at the cell. 120hz 50% duty cycle into the inductors. I'm getting dc spikes out of the inductors for the most part now, not ac.
David Bixler How do you manage dc out of a coil? any pulse put through a coil comes out AC at the other end? You did something right. Maybe the MUR1560 diode?
I've had that problem a lot in the past. Especially with the five coil vic. the Mur1560 never helped in my experience. it comes down to coil inductance and capacitance as well as the core material and frequency. Its definitely easier when the transformer and inductors aren't on the same core.
At least that is my experience
Remove electrons and switch off the bond. The Voltage Polarisation Process
When the gas processor ionises the air to remove electrons. This air is mixed with water to make water fuel. When this water fuel is ionised. The processed air with missing electrons gives the oxygen a very strong electron gravity and is used to remove electrons from the water molecule. Causing a polarity flip and so splitting the molecule.. It’s a triggering process! He said, This is the voltage polarisation of the water molecule.. The covalent bond is equal to the two shared electrons and if you remove these electrons. The oxygen atom will flip back to a positive charge instantly repelling the atoms.. Processing the air in his air gas processor he removes up to 4 electrons from the oxygen in air and uses this as a tool by dissolving the processed air into the water in the way air is dissolved to keep fish alive in a fish tank.. This is what he called his water fuel.. If you don't make the water fuel first then all of his inventions will not work as described.. I hope this is helpful to you..
Is that a power supply transformer from a microwave oven? Wjy is it that everyone posts CZcams videos, doesn't explain so all people would be able to replicate it at home. Make a neat and simple version, explain it, help people achieve the goal of making hho the most efficient way,
circuit diagram please, ur apparatus details please
If you have a large hydrogen generator like that with high voltage I would imagine it could be dangerous if you have any poor connections. large volume means a large amount of highly volatile gas, why not start with a small scale experiment.
Have you heard of irondmax
i simply can't understand can u pls explain the circuit and system in an email to me pls.....
whats your email
mihirsahu99@gmail.con
1780V
Gas production
Too little
Pulse sequence +
Gate will achieve this effect
He is using 50V and the back emf voltage spikes across the capacitor is 1780
Pretty neat but 500volts at .5amps is 250 watts. It's not working at 100% efficiency so it's using more power than that. OUCH.