New Patriot Missile System Launcher MEADS In Detail Review Commercial 2014 Carjam TV HD
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 08. 2024
- CARJAM TV - Subscribe Here Now / carjamradio
Like Us Now On Facebook: / carjamtv
For The World's Best Car Videos
Website: www.carjamtv.com
Twitter: / carjamtv
Tumblr: / www
Facebook: / carjamtv
Pinterest: / carjam-tv
CZcams: / carjamradio
The Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS) is a ground-mobile air and missile defense system intended to replace the aging Patriot missile system through a NATO-managed development.[1] The USA, Germany, and Italy are contributing toward the project.
Under development by Germany, Italy, and the United States, MEADS is a ground-mobile air and missile defense (AMD) system intended to replace Patriot systems in the United States and Germany, and Nike Hercules systems in Italy. MEADS is designed to address the shortcomings of fielded systems and to permit full interoperability between the U.S. and allied forces. It is the only medium-range AMD system to provide full 360-degree coverage against tactical ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles, aircraft, and large-caliber rockets.
MEADS provides ground-mobile air and missile defense with expanded coverage. The system provides enhanced force protection against a broad array of third-dimension threats. Improved interoperability, mobility, and full 360-degree defense capability against the evolving threat represent are key aspects. MEADS is the first air and missile defense (AMD) system that provides continuous on-the-move protection for maneuver forces. MEADS also provides area defense, homeland defense, and weighted asset protection.[2] It also meets the requirements of Germany's "capabilities oriented" air defense concept.
MEADS incorporates the Lockheed Martin hit-to-kill PAC-3 PAC-3 Missile Segment Enhancement (MSE) missile in a system including 360-degree surveillance and fire control sensors, netted-distributed tactical operations centers, and lightweight launchers.[3]
Truck-mounted MEADS elements drive or roll on and off C-130 and A400M transport aircraft so they can quickly be deployed to a theater of operations. Compared to existing systems, MEADS can defend up to 8 times the coverage area with far fewer system assets, which also permits a substantial reduction in deployed personnel and equipment. MEADS reduces demand for airlift and gets into the theater faster, to begin defending sooner.[4]
The minimum MEADS engagement capability requires only one launcher, one battle manager, and one fire control radar to provide 360-degree defense of troops or critical assets. As more system elements arrive, they automatically and seamlessly join the MEADS network and build out capability.[5]
The prime contractor, MEADS International, is a multinational joint venture headquartered in Orlando, Florida. Its participating companies are MBDA Italia, MBDA Deutschland GmbH, and Lockheed Martin. The company initially won a competitive downselect to develop the MEADS system in 1999,[6] but the program could not be started because the losing competitor filed two successive protests. In 2001, a $216 million Risk Reduction Effort contract was awarded to incorporate a new interceptor approach.[7] In May 2005, MEADS International signed a definitized contract valued at $2 billion plus €1.4 billion for MEADS design and development. This contract is expected to be completed in 2014.[8] The United States funds 58 percent of the MEADS Design and Development program, and European partners Germany and Italy provide 25 percent and 17 percent respectively.
The German Bundeswehr completed an analysis of air defense alternatives in 2010 and strongly recommended MEADS as the basis for improving Germany's missile defense shield and as Germany's contribution to the European Phased Adaptive Approach.[9] In February 2011, the U.S. Department of Defense announced that it intended to fulfill its commitment to complete the design and development effort, but that it would not procure the MEADS system for budgetary reasons.[10] In early 2011, it was announced that Germany would only fund the system up to development. It is not yet determined if funding for procurement will follow.[11]
The MIM-104 Patriot is a surface-to-air missile (SAM) system, the primary of its kind used by the United States Army and several allied nations. It is manufactured by the U.S. defense contractor Raytheon and derives its name from the radar component of the weapon system. The AN/MPQ-53 at the heart of the system is known as the "Phased Array Tracking Radar to Intercept On Target" or the bacronym PATRIOT. The Patriot System replaced the Nike Hercules system as the U.S. Army's primary High to Medium Air Defense (HIMAD) system. en.wikipedia.or...
MEADS, THAAD, Patriot and Avenger. I really thought the USA didn't have any significant air defence systems, but this is fine.
and sm-3 and others
You forgot that the US is the strongest country in the world...you underestimated the US which many country does.
@@nesseihtgnay9419 a lot of Americans and their allies overestimate USA's capabilities. They couldn't beat Vietnam in a conventional war.
@@RR-us2kp Nah, Vietnam wasn't a conventional war. It was a guerilla tactics war.
@@Sedna063 yeah. Still, those Vietcong didn't have half the technology or the resources of USA. And still won.
Russia has about 50k aging nukes running on Windows 95.
+Henry Audey you mean Windows Trotsky all the way up to Windows Yeltsin - Vodka edition ? and let's not forget the new Windows Cyka - Blyat edition.
+Henry Audey Let's hope they upgrade to Windows Vista, and cripple their whole missile system!
It doesnt matter which system you run it on.CIA still uses floopy
Germany developed the AESA radar on it so Russia dont underestimate it completely.
All western Missile defences are crap. They can't even track the Titanic
Little mistake in the title. Don't confuse patriot and meads systems. They are completely separate systems. The only thing they have in common is the pac 3 missiles.
Apart from that, the radars, launchers, battle managers and networking principles are completely different from each other.
The title is incorrect , MEADS is not used on any part of Patriot. It does use Lockheed PAC 3 missiles but it not Patriot.
True.
This, guy has a golden voice!
Idk why it look better if the MEADS is installed in MAN SX45.
ill start worrying about russian technology when they start producing automobiles and sell it in the world's car market
Best comment :D
But unfortunately they can't even make a working car that a russian would buy.
civilian cars don't protect mother Russia
@@MirceaBv Russia made cars are bestsellers in Russia.
I can point out a few interesting facts and holes in that demo they showed, esp where 1) they had the aircraft flying in a racetrack pattern and 2) they didnt specify the distance the TBM missile was detected and killed.
In a real shooting war, the enemy wont be sitting up in the sky saying hello for long. They'd pop in and out very quickly and most likely at max detection range.
However I do understand the need to keep those details secret.
The OUT OF PLANE maneuver is a very welcome advancement though.
in case that plane would get out of the oval
would the Rockets still be able to Destroy it ?
THat´s the 1 million dollar question boy. Or maybe even the multi billion dollar question, because PATRIOT systems had only an accuray of 20-30% per rocket while the S-300 had an accuracy of 70% per rocket.
The funny thing is, that the designers of this system will first create it, waste billions for it and than "realise" they need lots of upgrades like the one you mentioned, which will cost billions again.
This is how millitary business works nowadays and I am pretty sure that this will be the case in this system, because Lockheed Martin is involved in this project.
weapon and ammunition manufacturers are the only ones winning in war
No 90° vertical launch? The hydraulic should move faster too......this system needs continous evolution .it has a Nice compact set up I must say.
***** I meant the radar tracking from the Rocket.. not the sky scanner~ground radar. Remember Interceptor rockets can be counter intercepted themselves.
Permenus nyatete or by saturating the defended area with incoming projectiles.
This is on par with S-400, or it will be once it becomes operational. MEADS is specifically designed to counter future air threats. But then again, I don't care if even S-400 was a bit better since US Air force is so much more powerful then a couple of Russian jets.
it has 360 all time so you are misinformed
robert istrate still alittle cumbersome..compared to a compact TOR system which contains all radar/command/and launcher segments on a single chassis.Vertical cold launching preserves the system better too..rather than trashing/burning it every time. I Still Love Meads all the same..its an impressive improvement from the old Patriot system.
Is US Army watching this?? Buy MEADS imidiately and replace Patriot with it. MEADS is among the world's best SAM systems available, similar to S-400 or better. But US Army is pushing and pushing Patriot upgrades claiming it costs less. But that is a lie. MEADS is cheaper then Patriot and what's important more capable by the order of magnitude. Since Army currently invest in absolutely nothing and there are no new development projects and procurement (except JLTV) ever since Future combat system fell trough, now is the time to shop and spend money. This should be procured right now, before Future vertical lift program starts sucking money from Army and Marines in a few years. Although US military doctrine always envisioned anti air warfare through achieving air superiority with superior air force (witch is still applicable since USAF still dominates the sky), they should invest in modern SAM systems that would protect US and NATO ground troops when fighter jets are not available, and Patriot won't do, especially against modern manuevering cruise missiles.
All the jealous Russians on here lol
Let them polish with propaganda their 50 years old S-300 junk re-branded again and again and presented on Russia Today as a new weapon.
Happy bankruptcy assholes :)
Why would the Russians be jealous?
Same 2 u
have water in my eyes
At that altitude at that speed no problem dont worry its safe
Ricardo Mendes it works in concert with THAAD, Patriot, Hit to kill systems
nice
So why the chemtrail planes still flying in our airspace daily.
+timez draggen Get your head out of your ass.
Would be good if scamjets were used
Erősen készülnek a békére!
That shit doesn't even work hahaha
can borrow one these sense you care so much you can park on sea grange green what the best system what about electronics EMP maybe i find a basement somewhere
Germany will get this system to 100% and just paid 25% of the development cost, while the US will be stuck with the old Patriot system.
At mach 8 at 150kms altitude it whould be ok
But at 40 kms altitude its not safe
iskander is a real test
Nah, the US prefers testing their systems on export version of Soviet rockets made in the 50s :D And still the American patriots showed awful results to old SCUD-systems xD.
We Europeans have to get rid of those American warmongers. If they wanna start a war with Russia, they can do it from California, but not from Europe. Neither Russians nor normal Europeans have an interest in war in Europe, but America has because America is in high debt and de facto bankrupt.
OEddiO
pretty much in sync - just europe shares some bad habits. The European army in the pipeline for starters.
@softair1231 butthurt?
@@OEddiO America is in a moderate level of debt compared to other nations. Neither are they bankrupt, they can meet all their due payments fine.
Ask to South Arabia if are good Aramco
سبحان الله وبحمده سبحان الله العظيم.
سبحان الله وبحمده
LOLOL, Topol-M has 10 war heads and 40 decoys, at 23 Mach, good luck intercepting that.
Look..Killer whale USS subs are patrolling nearby..no need to intercept anything..Mother Russia should be really worried.
Permenus nyatete keep in mind every new minuteman is about the same as your Topol Ms. But just real close to your territory!! Eat your Sacrament and repent everyday.Just in case.
Permenus nyatete
Cute. US has subs? Last i heard they were docked in England because of engine failure, 2014. Munite man. HAHA they are in lauch only from US territory. And topol is old we now are using YARS.
Yes the U.S. Has subs a shit ton of them they are widely known to be the most advanced subs in the world
Richard Hayhurst
Yes clearly one broke down last year and sent to England, meanwhile in a training exercise with France, one french submarine sunk the aircraft carrier and its surrounding ships. Keep dreaming about your superiority. Just like Vietnam.
Patriot missile must be improve the capability such s400 and s500 russian
Absolutely. We should design an equivalent system. MEADS is a right step forward but I think we should really throw some money and make a deadly S500 matchup
@@Sedna063 Naah
Die bundeswehr muss dieses system haben!!
Nein. Wir bräuchten eine Art S-400/500. PATRIOT, THAAD und AEGIS sind der teuerste Müll. Die können rein gar nichts im Radar erfassen und die Spielzeugraketen die sie abfeuern halten keine Interkontinentalrakete oder Kampfjets auf. Das russische System kann Ziele im Weltall bekämpfen und auch die neuen gefürchteten Hyperschallraketen von denen heute nur Russland Gebrauch macht.
@@SX41799 Solange, du ca 400km Reichweite hast und schnell bist würde es trotzdem absolut nichts bringen, wenn du nicht akkurat bist. Durch die Hit-to-kill Funktion der Pac-3 hat er genau diese Funktion und macht es perfekt beziungsweise die S-400 arbeitet immer noch mit der Splitter wolke.
Zwar ist dir S-400 in Bekämpfung gegen bemannten Flugzeugen gut jedoch was marschflugkörper und Ballistische Ziele angeht hat die Meads einen gewaltigen Vorteil.
Während die PAC-3 in einer Höhe von 45km feindliche Ziele bekämpfen kann, kann die S-400 nur in einer höher von 30km feindliche Ziele bekämpfen.
Was die Bekämpfung von cruise missiles angeht ist die S-400 absolut Müll dort ist die Meads beiweitem besser.
Yup, Meads battle tested and ready...S400 pfff
Battle tested? Where? When?
Patriot vs Iskander M Lol
Desert storm lol. Patriot can stop anything apart from absolutely everything.
Iskander is basically unstoppable.
Aster missile is better....
Os americanos deveriam fabricarem parecido com pantsir russo.
🦅🦅🦅⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
L6
Can it detect stealth fighters? lol PAK FA T-50? F-22?
Pak fa and t50 are the same thing. It was the project which turned into the su57.
Yes...it can....
No match for the Mighty S-400
no mach for the S300 let alone the S400 and S500.
00008HANK True that my friend. This is classified fireworks against the S-400
Tors Hammare yup
MEADS IS BETTER THAN S-400:
-MEADS have 8 missile launcher tubes while the S-400 only 4.
-MEADS is cheaper than expensive S-400.
***** if it has 8 tubes dosent mean 2 shits S400's have a 99% chance too hit the target.
USA 🇺🇸
الوو
kkkkk fake defense patriot kkkkkkkkkkk failed in Saud Arab kkkkkkkk
This is not PATRIOT smartass.
Aster missile is better...
Meads us n nato ground missles to air so smart can destroy any enemy incoming missles. Russian n china be careful.
russian has intercontinental ballistic missile 12 mach speed goodnight usa
jack brkic think u misconculated budy, have u see us new hi-tec right now in service, u work it out what mean budy?
jack brkic Since you are a ignorant SOB let me educate you. Russia has a Mach 22 ICBM (SS-19 Satan) just like US has Mach 20 SLBMs - Trident D5 II. So go and Google a bit next time before you post such a silly comments. Or better yet, don't bother to post on military subject, I'm sure you know a thing or two about Kim Kardashian's ass.
no one is going to go to nuclear war because we know it will be the end of the world if Russia and the USA does this
Richard Hayhurst Well it's about time we reset the planet. We've done enough shit to it. I say - let the missiles fly.
Why don't they just re-badge the early S-300 that Russians are finishing retiring right now. Better and cheaper.
yes! like that semi retired TOW missile smashing a T-90 over syria??
+Cornfed Warrior ?
shet sistem hahahahahah real sistem s 400 russian triumf!!!
Sounds convincing...
@Dejan, Russian S400 is an ICMB. This one here is a shield system. I guess US never airs it's huge rockets (ICMBs) like the Russians do on CZcams. You'll never see them easily. Ask the Putin :)
ip9991 they fownd out it was a Ukranian fighter jet they fownd 30mm cannon holes in it.
ip9991 ahaa so if i whach RT dose it matter? all individual websights Russian German US UK all say this but CNN is too pussy too admit or say enything.
ip9991 ONE THING nazis dident have 50.00 nuclear war heads.
Fuck how it looks pathetic next to the Russian S400
looking pathetic is one thing and being effective is another
@@mrseriousman100 is it effective?
Nice copy .
Lol... Copy?
+Cornfed Warrior yes , not as superior as Russian (S-400 ) Russia was always step ahead in air defence systems ... Just take a look at old Patriots . BTW Russia is working on (s-500) right now which is going to kick out any space objects from the orbit ...
Russia is broke! In order to make the S590 you need billions! Putin has no billions! Meanwhile NATO has trillions on its desposal to figure out how to shoot Avery s400 and s5000 out there..
Cornfed Warrior if Russia is broke how did we manage to resume the production ( tu-160- white swan ) and also managed to create a new 5th gen tanks platform ( armata-14, 15 ) ?
Cornfed Warrior one thing I will tell you for sure , you don't want to go war with Russia ! It might be the last war , we are a nuclear power country and we never give up.
US air defense is shit. All we have is this and stingers. Then there's Russia...
Ya ya says the Russian troll. How would you know shit about about it.
Naked Acres Im actually american and i've seen the equipment of the US air defense its literally just.
Stinger
Patriot
Avenger
Phalanx CIWS
+MC-PS-PLAYA And you know this new system is junk how? It's not even up and running and yet you know it's junk? The PAC-2 is well proven. No reason to think the PAC-3 won't be better. You did notice the mention of the new radar didn't you?
Naked Acres Ive never said this system is shit but i don't think its enough for a country thats on everyone's hit list.
+MC-PS-PLAYA Again, how would you have any idea? The US is well aware of the treats facing it. Yet they just restarted the DDG program with confidence after some upgrades. That says a lot. Also the US information is closer to acurate than what Russia and China release. So when China claims something I assume it is BS. When the US claims something I wonder if the next generation is already operational.
its like Russian system s-400
but it has 8 missiles instead of 4
@@xAlexTobiasxB s 400 has 4 medium range(120km) missiles or 1 long range(250km) missile in each canister.
Nope. The Patriot, THAAD, AEGIS and MEADS radars are trash. Russia's S-400 is 10 years more advanced than our western counterparts. The S-500 is even more powerful
russia is better !!!!
And cheaper.
Copy s400
How?
Germany developed the AESA radar on it so Russia dont underestimate it completely.
USA made the missile. So that cancels it out. Germany should've made that too.
Russia never underestimate other country.. its different from US always insult and underestimate other country.. 👍👍