Jodha Akbar Was Incorrect - Medha Bhaskaran Explains Why Akbar Wasn't That Great

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 18. 10. 2022
  • Watch The Full Episode Here: • Aurangzeb & Shivaji Ma...
    Listen To The Full Episode On Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/1GMb...
    🎧 Listen To #TheRanveerShow On Spotify:
    open.spotify.com/show/6ZcvVBP...
    Check out my Meditation app: Level SuperMind
    Get Android - bit.ly/AndroidApp_Link
    Get iOS - apple.co/3SyiPcE
    Know more about Level :
    bit.ly/levellinktree
    Follow Medha Bhaskaran's Social Media Handles:-
    Instagram: / medha.deshmukh.bhaskaran
    Facebook: / medha.bhaskaran
    Twitter: / medhadb
    LinkedIn: / medha-bhaskaran-467ba2139
    ✅ Subscribe To Our Other CZcams Channels:-
    BeerBiceps (English Channel):
    / beerbicepsofficial
    Ranveer Allahbadia (Hindi Channel):
    / ranveerallahbadia
    TRS Clips हिंदी (Hindi Podcast Highlights):
    / @theranveershowhindi
    BeerBiceps Shorts (English Shorts):
    / @bestoftrs
    Ranveer Allahbadia Shorts (Hindi Shorts):
    / @bestoftrshindi
    BigBrainco. :
    / @raaazofficial
    BigBrainco. Shorts :
    / @raaazclips
    Welcome to the 3-part special on the story of Shivaji Maharaj, always waited to present this to the audience. Our guest today is Medha Bhaskaran, a microbiologist, an author, and another all-star of The Ranveer Show. The wealth of knowledge she has is truly incredible, honoured to host Medha ma'am at our space for such fantastic episodes we created with her. In this episode, we go into the depths of the Mughal empire, before the Shivaji Maharaj era, and what was the country's socio-economic status back then, what was the reality of the kings and the emperors who ruled our land mass. REAL Stories Of Indian History Uncovered - Watch out.
    Medha Bhaskaran, from the year 2000 onwards, started studying Mughal Maratha history as she felt passionate about it. More than a hundred books were referred to, forts visited, and discussions with historians, weapon experts and other people involved in the subjects continued. She is the author of Shivaji's bestselling biography, Challenging Destiny. Amazon Link: www.amazon.in/Challenging-Des...
    This episode is a 3-part conversation starting from the rule of the Mughal Empire, before the Shivaji Maharaj era, then part 2 where we talk about the times when India saw the rise of Shivaji Maharaj, and then comes part 3 where we talk about his final vision. Stay Tuned as Part 2 and Part 3 of this series will be released in the following two Tuesdays of the Month of October.
    #akbar #1633
    INSTAGRAM : @beerbiceps
    / beerbiceps
    FACEBOOK : @beerbiceps
    / beerbiceps
    TWITTER : @beerbicepsguy
    / beerbicepsguy
    LINKEDIN : @beerbiceps
    / beerbiceps
    TELEGRAM: @beerbicepsguy
    t.me/beerbicepsguy
    SNAPCHAT: @beerbicepsguy
    ----------------------------------------------
    About :
    TRS Clips is a collection of SHORT CLIPS from The Ranveer Show podcast. Enjoy our latest knowledge-fueled videos from the BeerBiceps team. Every conversation on #TheRanveerShow is intellectual, deep & progressive. We cover everyone from entrepreneurs to Bollywood film stars to even athletes.
    Today, The Ranveer Show or TRS - Happiness Through Curiosity. A show where we host the world's greatest success stories and try digging out their secrets to success. Every conversation is an EXTREME learning experience for the viewer.

Komentáře • 1,6K

  • @TheRanveerShowClips
    @TheRanveerShowClips  Před rokem +96

    Check out my Meditation app: Level SuperMind
    Get Android - bit.ly/AndroidApp_Link
    Get iOS - apple.co/3SyiPcE
    Know more about Level :
    bit.ly/levellinktree

    • @tradingforliving8264
      @tradingforliving8264 Před rokem +1

      he is not cruel.

    • @kalpparashar5017
      @kalpparashar5017 Před rokem

      No ranveer this is also a fiction. The truth is that except britishers and portuguese nobody from outside including the so-called islamists mongol turks crossbreed mughals has ruled us. They ruled mostly delhi . And delhi wasn't of that much importance back then . It's only later after kolkata delhi became the capital. And no muslims has ruled us it's a myth lie created by leftists distortions in service of congress.

    • @shilpisingh4844
      @shilpisingh4844 Před rokem

      Plz ye video hindi me bhi banaiye because ekta ke akabar show ke lover up state me hai

    • @poojas8269
      @poojas8269 Před rokem +1

      A 9

    • @Bullseye108
      @Bullseye108 Před měsícem

      Understanding about Akhbar from Urduwood movies like Mughale Azam and Jodha Akhbar is like understanding about Mouse from cartoon mickey mouse and Ratatouille 😂😂

  • @barkhaagarwalla
    @barkhaagarwalla Před rokem +2505

    This always made me wonder. Why Akbar was shown so empathetic and kind in modern day cinema and television. When we know reading history that he was not. Thankfully, finally, someone is speaking about it. I never understood why Bollywood liked to whitewash him as this Mr. Nice guy.

    • @adwatt357
      @adwatt357 Před rokem

      Because every jihadi criminal is their hero and its not bollywood its karachiwood run my Porkistan!!

    • @vinaytalluri
      @vinaytalluri Před rokem

      Bollywood is financed predominantly by the Underworld and BI forces

    • @tivky
      @tivky Před rokem +63

      he also looked like central asian and was very short in height.

    • @barkhaagarwalla
      @barkhaagarwalla Před rokem +54

      @@tivky Projecting certain kinds of body types as ideal has always been Bollywood's forte. It is really sad as to what Bollywood has done to the standards of Indian cinema.

    • @vickyray6042
      @vickyray6042 Před rokem +40

      That's what liberalism and too much leftist ideology does to history...

  • @cyan3692
    @cyan3692 Před rokem +3282

    The Real Dark side of Bollywood...hitting now as Karma...

    • @feniljariwala1738
      @feniljariwala1738 Před rokem +86

      Gutterwood

    • @muzungchimr3527
      @muzungchimr3527 Před rokem +30

      No need to bring Bollywood drama here. Its not twitter!!

    • @cyan3692
      @cyan3692 Před rokem +1

      @@muzungchimr3527 Jodha Akbar, a product of Bollywood is already here in this video idiot. No one is "bringing" it...

    • @RojaJaneman
      @RojaJaneman Před rokem +40

      It’s just the beginning. They won’t learn and will keep losing wealth.

    • @sergemerto256
      @sergemerto256 Před rokem +15

      Go comment on Hollywood movies also then 😂😂😂

  • @virajnaik102
    @virajnaik102 Před rokem +1792

    As per V. D. Savarkar "Akbar was kind means actually he was less cruel than other Mughal emperor"

    • @Alephbaypay
      @Alephbaypay Před rokem +75

      yeah like own local ones were any sweeter.. Shiva Bhosle killed 400K Shivites from Hyderabad - men women and children! razed temples and didn't even spare the cattle!

    • @ashutoshraut2893
      @ashutoshraut2893 Před rokem +81

      @@ritikkumar1250 correct..madrassa ka topper

    • @user-dw9hc5jh3t
      @user-dw9hc5jh3t Před rokem +13

      Not less cruel , actually in Savarkar's time it was not very well known and also Before 1920s i think Savarkar was kind of secular man. They knew about the i$lamic cruelity but not very precisely. I don't actually remember when did savarkar wrote this but yea the Akbarnama and other books became available completely in english after 1930 and so , i guess.

    • @kvarun88
      @kvarun88 Před rokem +21

      Exactly. Please put things in perspective.. there are cruel leaders in Non Mughal emperor's too..

    • @kvarun88
      @kvarun88 Před rokem +4

      She is jus delusional, like the Ranveer guy.

  • @flickhunter8900
    @flickhunter8900 Před rokem +651

    this lady is badass. I loved the way she spilled out truth

    • @binod7623
      @binod7623 Před rokem +10

      she is a microbiologist😆

    • @ifrahasim392
      @ifrahasim392 Před rokem +1

      I see, and how you know she is right?
      India is trying to mask history to feel good. She is not even historian .

    • @wasis001
      @wasis001 Před rokem +4

      😂😂 microbiologist as historian

    • @HKG432
      @HKG432 Před rokem +7

      How the hell is she spilling the truth LOL? She's just an egomaniac sounding like she knows everything

    • @tanweeransari2132
      @tanweeransari2132 Před rokem +7

      "The truth is there is no truth, anyone can be god for someone and devil for another"
      -Eren Kruger (Attack On Titan)

  • @juhichaturvedi591
    @juhichaturvedi591 Před rokem +284

    Honestly I don't think people fell for Akbar's character. Guess it was Hritik's looks and the poise with which he presented the character that people fell in love with. I was 12 year old too back when the movie was released, this brought back memories of good school days and the discussion in classrooms that how the movie and books are different

    • @rao433
      @rao433 Před rokem +21

      That's exactly what bullyweed does. Employs good looking/handsome faces to twist history and white washes the gory truth.

    • @kushagragurnani3730
      @kushagragurnani3730 Před rokem +2

      @A to Z Everything.. which history have you read bro. persian sources or left wing ones. like literally if mughals had won all wars why is it that our country is still completely hindu. forget hindu sources even english, portugese and dutch sources praise indian resistance to islam.

    • @soch1110
      @soch1110 Před rokem

      It was to support love jihad, supported by underworld of bullywood.

    • @joltheosas9565
      @joltheosas9565 Před 7 měsíci

      ​@@kushagragurnani3730because mughals were indianized pretty quickly under akbar bruh jahangir was half rajput shah jahan was 75% rajput they had rajput generals, mughal armies bulk was made up by hindus its not away a religious war like which is presented in media

  • @WarriorDeb
    @WarriorDeb Před rokem +539

    Just visit Rajasthan and you'll know how cruel was Akbar...

    • @vartikashukla4693
      @vartikashukla4693 Před rokem +4

      How??

    • @WarriorDeb
      @WarriorDeb Před rokem +126

      @@vartikashukla4693 I've visited the place where Jauhar occurred and Queen sacrificed her life with other girls just to save them from the brute cruel forces of Akbar who personally brought hell for the Hindus of Rajasthan

    • @vartikashukla4693
      @vartikashukla4693 Před rokem +30

      @@WarriorDeb okay okay....thanks for sharing.....🙏....why bollywood didn't search for these facts before romanticism of Jodha Akbar?? ..........I too believed for more than a decade that inspite of being Mughal and invader he was kind and great...🥲🥲

    • @WarriorDeb
      @WarriorDeb Před rokem +84

      @@vartikashukla4693 Bollywood is full of propaganda, but you should visit Rajasthan once to know more, I've visited almost entire India and I've seen places, have known histories which depicts the plight of the Hindus. You'll cry when you'll listen to stories of Kashmiri Hindus, One Hindu caretaker who is now converted to Islam, told us the stories, which I can't tell you here.

    • @WarriorDeb
      @WarriorDeb Před rokem +18

      @@vartikashukla4693 My present profile picture is captured by me, it's the picture of the monument of Maharana Pratap with his horse Chetak in Rajasthan...

  • @msriram9884
    @msriram9884 Před rokem +1034

    The Moghuls were outsiders to India who claimed Mongolian ancestry from Tamerlane and Genghis Khan. Not just in India, in many places when their are outside rulers, they tend to be cruel and uncaring of local indigenous cultures and peoples. The Moghuls, like most outside colonizers, ran an extractive economy that took from the local people. Contrast that to indigenous empires like Ahom, Chola or Vijayanagara where living conditions for the average person benefitted.

    • @AdityaKapur96
      @AdityaKapur96 Před rokem +25

      Obviously, when the administration is from the people and the administrators are connected with the public, it would lead to a booming economy and better living standards

    • @spectrum1548
      @spectrum1548 Před rokem +22

      Yes that's why we still have Hindu Dynasties and not even a few Mughal dynasties exist.🤣

    • @PaulAllen6304
      @PaulAllen6304 Před rokem +64

      Zahiruddin Babur is a heroic figure in Uzbekistan. In Farghana, there is a huge statue of Babur and the park is called Babur square. Uzbeks celebrate him as, "This is the guy who f**ked India hahaha"
      Irony is, even we Indians celebrate our f**ker
      We should celebrate Shershaah and Hemu if at all. Shershaah was a Bihari pathan who loved India, and Hemu was his brave general. They really gave Mughals(foreigners) hard time😂😂

    • @Dhruv_Dogra
      @Dhruv_Dogra Před rokem +6

      Excellent points...

    • @Poseiden786
      @Poseiden786 Před rokem +15

      Mughals were not the descendants of Mongols. The mongols were from today's Mongolia and north-eastern china. The Mughals were turks!

  • @giris5962
    @giris5962 Před rokem +507

    Literally i feel terrible when the history of Peshawa Bajirao Rao 's is twisted by these Bollywood insane people 😠

    • @milind8783
      @milind8783 Před rokem +35

      That intimate scenes - so embarrassing to watch our Hiro like that. 😏😏

    • @ghaniakhan1697
      @ghaniakhan1697 Před rokem +2

      @@milind8783 absolutely right

    • @mehh9364
      @mehh9364 Před rokem +3

      Can you please educate me on this please? I was wondering how accurate that movie was after getting to know the dark history or akbar!

    • @milind8783
      @milind8783 Před rokem +19

      @@mehh9364 his army attack chittorgarh - birth place of Maharana Prataap and after victory, his army killed almost 10,000 innocent Hindus. He had 3000 concubines and around 200+ boyfriend.
      Today's terrorist are nothing in front of him.

    • @mehh9364
      @mehh9364 Před rokem +5

      @@milind8783 I'm sorry but who are you talking about?

  • @dhirajheliya6090
    @dhirajheliya6090 Před rokem +782

    Thanks alot brother for this podcast. I wish someone in Bollywood makes the movie on reality

    • @spectrum1548
      @spectrum1548 Před rokem

      Yeah the same Bollywood should make a movie on Modi again and show how he paved the way to killing Thousands of muslims.

    • @abhrajitpaul6057
      @abhrajitpaul6057 Před rokem +11

      I don't think anyone will.
      People wants money now days.

    • @Hershal13
      @Hershal13 Před rokem +8

      If they do that movie will be boring and no one will be watching it.

    • @prashantkhodecha7622
      @prashantkhodecha7622 Před rokem

      can you mess with your boss? if not, how can you think that Bollywood will show reality of these Islamic Invaders when major money comes from D-wood.

    • @EvaraOnline
      @EvaraOnline Před rokem +1

      🤣🤣🤣acha joke tha

  • @rgodase
    @rgodase Před rokem +549

    This interview was needed and thank god it happened.

    • @SiyaRaama
      @SiyaRaama Před rokem +6

      Godse ji aap idar .....??? 😂

    • @rgodase
      @rgodase Před rokem +13

      @@SiyaRaama 😀 idhar to ana hi padega

    • @ashishnatraj
      @ashishnatraj Před rokem +1

      @@SiyaRaama jaha insaaf krna hota hai aur schhai ki baat ho to GODSE JI aate hi hai🙏

    • @SiyaRaama
      @SiyaRaama Před rokem

      @@ashishnatraj aanahi hai na😂

  • @chaitanyatuckley4666
    @chaitanyatuckley4666 Před rokem +157

    Thanks Ranveer for bringing these topics up.

  • @manishkarnik
    @manishkarnik Před rokem +153

    Her book Challeging Destiny was an eye opener, it also helps with building fortitude.

  • @jayakrushnasahoo4403
    @jayakrushnasahoo4403 Před rokem +163

    "Do you think all of the history's characters are great?" - that's a deeply rooted good question.. Kudos 👍👍

    • @bapparawal2457
      @bapparawal2457 Před rokem +15

      Is all human beings good?? Seriously . No . Then how can all historical figures be great?

    • @kianim8344
      @kianim8344 Před rokem +2

      Who asks this stupid question ? Of course not every character were great because they were humans and every human is not same and I mean random human not fate-selected celestial humans

    • @sarfarazjelil7080
      @sarfarazjelil7080 Před rokem +4

      That’s the stupidest question of all time.

    • @sugakookies1710
      @sugakookies1710 Před rokem +2

      Good people would never be able to raise to that level of power

    • @thetalltree2855
      @thetalltree2855 Před rokem +5

      Deeply rooted? Haha... That's so shallow and stupid. To rise to a level of power even in civilised world of today involves being downright cruel and ruthless. Back then wars, invasions annexation was the norm.

  • @akshat7055
    @akshat7055 Před rokem +221

    "Akbar-The Great" that was he title of the chapter about akbar in my 4th class history ook so not just movie but when we are taught the same in in school too both of them togeather creates that image of akbar,a kind and a gentle one which is far away from the reality

    • @gia42472
      @gia42472 Před rokem +28

      He is called the great not because he was innocent or cruel but because of his policies, warfare techniques etc. Alexander is called the great. He is considered cruelest king ever. But he conquered the world. That's why he is called great not because of him being good king. There's nothing like good king. Broaden your horizon.

    • @rggonsalves6516
      @rggonsalves6516 Před rokem +6

      It was fascinating to learn about history from a highly qualified microbiologist and entrepreneur! Absolute nonsense!

    • @Godamongmen494
      @Godamongmen494 Před rokem +4

      @@gia42472 that's foolishness, imagine conquering the world, taking so many lives, sadness pain sorrow of families, then they died :D they played an important role in teaching the world what not to do. They are not great, they were fools. Look at RAM he always thought about his people, his wife his brothers and his teaching are still remembered, this is greatness

    • @gia42472
      @gia42472 Před rokem +3

      @@Godamongmen494 bro, ram is God while these others aren't. Understand the difference.

    • @JamesBond-dj3wo
      @JamesBond-dj3wo Před rokem

      @Gia N Ya the greatness is not all about king it's about what contribution he gave to state.
      . He killed his brother like Adam Khan because he attacked malwa and misbehave queen Rupmati.

  • @summaiyaamir5709
    @summaiyaamir5709 Před rokem +11

    Strage, she mentioned multiple times that the movie was incorrect without pointing out what was incorrect in the movie. She isn't being specific and said "I would rather not talk about it".

  • @satyamvijayvargiya8616
    @satyamvijayvargiya8616 Před rokem +42

    This is y i love your Podcast Ranveer.. you show us some fact which are also dark secrets

  • @veerbhogayevasundara7720
    @veerbhogayevasundara7720 Před rokem +11

    Wrong perception of India
    1. Gandhiji father of India
    2 . Akbar was great
    3. Nehru was a greatest PM

    • @user-oe3hb6cs7o
      @user-oe3hb6cs7o Před měsícem

      Want to ask why the 1st one is wrong,, as i beleive you must have studied about this,, so , plz do explain

    • @user-oe3hb6cs7o
      @user-oe3hb6cs7o Před měsícem

      N plzz try not to give what's up answers

    • @Mr_W_9102
      @Mr_W_9102 Před 29 dny +2

      4. Savarkar was Veer or freedom fighter 😂
      5. Godse was patriot 😂
      6. Modi was Vishwa guru 😂

  • @anishakakkar6358
    @anishakakkar6358 Před rokem +48

    As history major, I definitely get what she means by " not watching historical movies or dramas" .. these movies are messed up ngl

  • @JustJuveeee
    @JustJuveeee Před rokem +41

    If Akbar was not that great. So was allahudin khilji was not cruel as shown in padmavat. He was not barbaric, Nobody really want to learn reality. Plus nobody knows the actual reality. And kings irrespective any religion, country all wanted power and kingdom. They have done some good, some evil. That's human. That's politics. Thats world.

    • @JohnWick-nm6jx
      @JohnWick-nm6jx Před rokem +2

      Akbar Wasn't Great,
      He Was Great Amongst Mughals.
      That's Why We Call Him Great .

    • @chandnisahani6289
      @chandnisahani6289 Před rokem +1

      Hey go read books and then speak not by ur small mind pr choro tum jaise log jo jahangir etc all Mughal ko apna idol mante ho vo kya bolega and jakr dekhna jo galat h unhe hm k bhi bhi apna idol nhi bolte like u people,,Galt Galat hota h chahe vo koi bhi kre yeh nhi kaha ki hmare yahan sab acha hai pr bure ko hm apna idol nhi mante kyunki vo hindu hoga to samjhe pr etc ....... Bahut kuch h chahe jitna bol lo tumhare pale nhi pr ne vala so leave it .

    • @dparamful
      @dparamful Před rokem

      The Mughals were all about violence.

  • @SKB-fv8ze
    @SKB-fv8ze Před rokem +75

    In India Ram Sethu is symbol of Love , devotion & eternal purity.
    How can Akbar be a true lover where he marries to every nine month?
    Most of His marriage happened either to fulfil his lust or political gain nothing else.

    • @Kunwar_Arjun
      @Kunwar_Arjun Před rokem +7

      It's becoz Taj Mahal was built by Shah Jahan.
      But what ur saying is correct though.

    • @jinalvaghelabts4115
      @jinalvaghelabts4115 Před rokem +5

      Tu History padh whatsApp university se gyan mat le

    • @jinalvaghelabts4115
      @jinalvaghelabts4115 Před rokem +1

      Sab workers ko paise diye the usse enhone nayi city banayi shazahanabad yani ki old delhi

    • @Growth4Mindset
      @Growth4Mindset Před rokem +3

      Mere bhai kisi bhi wokers ka haath ni kaata Gaya tha

    • @SKB-fv8ze
      @SKB-fv8ze Před rokem +11

      @@jinalvaghelabts4115 U dear historian please check the Meaning of Orat this word arise from his rule.
      Also read what he did to his 1st wife.Meena bazar was greatly promoted during his rule where women were sell off .

  • @ratnachaudhary03
    @ratnachaudhary03 Před rokem +25

    Yes , this needs to come out 💯

  • @raga5232
    @raga5232 Před rokem +6

    The lady is not a historian but wants to downplay the good things that Akbar did for all the bad things that not only him but medieval rulers did across the world.

  • @PaulAllen6304
    @PaulAllen6304 Před rokem +74

    First of all, Hrithik was a more inaccurate choice for Akbar than Priyanka was for Mary Kom.
    Akbar was short, only 5'5, fat, pale, with a thin moustache and mongolian eyes(sources claim even his wives were taller than him)
    And then there is Hrithik, 6'1 inch, tanned, green eyes, chiseled face...lol. He would have been good as Shershaah Suri or Hemu, but not Akbar

    • @millennialmind9507
      @millennialmind9507 Před rokem +5

      Not even 5.5

    • @anasqureshi644
      @anasqureshi644 Před rokem +2

      Sounds like you have more problems with shorter people than Akbar himself 😅😅😅😅

    • @PaulAllen6304
      @PaulAllen6304 Před rokem +4

      @@anasqureshi644 Nope...I have problem with the way Akbar is potrayed as this incredible handsome man...

    • @banasmitakalita7373
      @banasmitakalita7373 Před rokem

      @@anasqureshi644 can u read the comment properly again bruh?

    • @banasmitakalita7373
      @banasmitakalita7373 Před rokem +1

      @@PaulAllen6304 naur these bollywood directors love to cast good looking guys in their movies so that desperate audience would watch em lol

  • @mansi6831
    @mansi6831 Před rokem +142

    actually ranveer really todoing appreciable job by called that person on his podcast who really know values of sanatan and india .... and show the reality of our kind, merciful, intelligent (as per our textbook) mughals king ........good job ranveer ❤

  • @anonymous-uf8us
    @anonymous-uf8us Před rokem +30

    She lost her argument and her true colour when she said she only watched 15 minutes of the movie

    • @archiem654
      @archiem654 Před rokem +6

      ... these people are same like the muslim fundamentalists they criticise...

    • @nishantmishra9679
      @nishantmishra9679 Před rokem

      @@archiem654 there's no benefit in watching a movie which is 180degree opposite from the reality she knows what the reality is so why she should watch that fake portrayal of a character??? Akbar was a cruel person you should read about his conquest in Chittorgarh there he slaughtered 30000 innocent Hindus

    • @nishantmishra9679
      @nishantmishra9679 Před rokem +4

      @@archiem654 Akbar was so cruel that he even converted birwal to Islam who was Hindu Brahmin

    • @archiem654
      @archiem654 Před rokem +4

      @@nishantmishra9679 if that was true, we would know Birbal by his muslim name.

    • @mercyseeker8471
      @mercyseeker8471 Před rokem

      @@archiem654 obviously!

  • @trinacoco8047
    @trinacoco8047 Před rokem +58

    I think in this case the famous tv serial Jodhaa Akbar did some justice ,because neither it showed only the "pious" side of Akbar it was something worth watching..I feel so

    • @Yogi_The_Bitter_Truth_2408
      @Yogi_The_Bitter_Truth_2408 Před rokem

      utter nonsense. a jihadi terrorist was converted into a kind man in these 2 kaudi ke dramas. it's like saying hitler is a kind man.

    • @aashtha_21
      @aashtha_21 Před rokem +2

      Agreed 💯

    • @rd_HIND
      @rd_HIND Před rokem +1

      Akbar had a pious side only in leftist textbooks , nowhere in reality.

    • @mohanaraga6477
      @mohanaraga6477 Před rokem +19

      😂😂😂 they didn't show that he killed his subordinates to have their wives and satisfy his lust..

    • @travel.music.food.5403
      @travel.music.food.5403 Před rokem

      @@mohanaraga6477 Then why did he stop the practice of haram?

  • @srsrt6979
    @srsrt6979 Před rokem +35

    Ranveer bhaiya u r winning hearts by showing the reality

  • @vinitapannu3211
    @vinitapannu3211 Před rokem +20

    Medha Bhaskaran ji , I fully agree with you..we believed what we were taught in school and college .how distorted the truth is I am getting to know now listening to factual talks based on true knowledge from you.. there are countless like me am sure..thank you for your inputs.. 🙏🇮🇳

  • @JAXX-wm6vr
    @JAXX-wm6vr Před rokem +80

    Many people say Akbar was very great , but he was not great . He was just a self obsessed and cruel Mughal king like his ancestors. If you don't know , during Akbar's conquest on chittorgarh. He massacred about 30,000 -40, 000 innocent civilians in the fort and made a skull tower from their heads to spread fear among the peoples. He was not great in any way . It's all truth.

    • @vp98215
      @vp98215 Před rokem +7

      That's how things worked during that time. Do you think a kind hearted person can be a king during that time. Even ashoka was ruthless before he turned to Buddhism and when he turned into a kind guy his kingdom fell. It was the starting of the fall of the maurya empire.
      Kings have to be ruthless and make decisions that won't be in public interest to stay in power.

    • @JAXX-wm6vr
      @JAXX-wm6vr Před rokem

      @@vp98215 Abe logo ko maarna kaha ka public interest hai kya bakvas karraha.

    • @JAXX-wm6vr
      @JAXX-wm6vr Před rokem +2

      @@vp98215 If you think killing is the only way to become great then go search about Emperor Kanishka, may your way about seeing things get changed.

    • @vp98215
      @vp98215 Před rokem +5

      @@JAXX-wm6vr every king went to war and killed people. That's how things worked during that time. The times change and along with that the way a king rules. Even kanishka went to war. Some kings made the people of the place they conquered slaves and some didn't.

    • @JAXX-wm6vr
      @JAXX-wm6vr Před rokem +3

      @@vp98215 Are you a Historian really??

  • @aditya-ul1ro
    @aditya-ul1ro Před rokem +38

    NO ruler was perfect.
    There are great aspects to Akbar and bad aspects too.
    But painting anyone in one color is terrible.
    Mughals, marathas, sikhs, cholas, guptas, mauryas and many others had good and bad acts.
    Speaking the truth is tough because indian audience lacks the guts to take criticism.

    • @animesloversunited9069
      @animesloversunited9069 Před rokem +4

      you don't have to add marathas, sikhs, cholas, guptas, mauryas and many others. there were no good thing they gave us

    • @aloknegi5157
      @aloknegi5157 Před rokem +10

      Well well well, there's no dynasty other than Chola which ruled for more than 2000 years according to the latest archaeological evidences. And if you wanna more about which dynasty or King had more good or bad aspects just check out the legitimate sites.

    • @DanishKhan-bt5yy
      @DanishKhan-bt5yy Před rokem +2

      That's what she said later in podcast 👍

    • @RishikhantPandian
      @RishikhantPandian Před rokem +2

      You are right.

    • @bharathratnani9532
      @bharathratnani9532 Před rokem

      Haha, spoken like a TRUE Gandhi Clan brand idiot. Yes I am painting you in one color only. Justnlike your ancestors would have, but I am glad they did not and you still have a name like Aditya and not Abdul or Ahmed.

  • @beingit916
    @beingit916 Před rokem +22

    Yes I agree with you

  • @bhairavijagtap2526
    @bhairavijagtap2526 Před rokem +12

    Really enjoyed the podcast, and appreciate the honesty and capacity of medhaji to tell us the truth about our history in simple yet strong words.
    Feel blessed to be able to avail this knowledge. Will surely buy your books ma'am.. May you have best of health, to research, write books and educate us.

  • @samruddhipaiyawal5586
    @samruddhipaiyawal5586 Před rokem +13

    Wow the way she's talking the truth is really appreciable!

  • @beingcyrus6821
    @beingcyrus6821 Před rokem +105

    Defaced, broken sculptures and statues of Hindu/ Buddhist/ Jain deities show a lot about how tolerant were these Mughals towards native population. These evil worshipers left no stone unturned to destroy everything that depicted glory and magnificence of Hindu culture and traditions.

  • @mohammad-bin-dajjal
    @mohammad-bin-dajjal Před rokem +22

    Get J. Sai Deepak he is a man with a spine and doesnt mince his words, unlike the lady here who is scared of god knows what.

    • @shodhitgoyal6539
      @shodhitgoyal6539 Před rokem +4

      He won't bring the one and only liberandu killer, he might drop too kuch truth bombs. Ranveer could not handle that

  • @rkrkdjdj845
    @rkrkdjdj845 Před rokem +57

    Which ruler, conqueror or king wasn’t cruel ? Battles and wars were part of almost every king, it may be due to saving one’s kingdom or to expand it. If Alexander and Ashoka, despite butchering millions can be Great, why can’t be Akbar. Akbar was Great because of his tolerance and respect towards other religions. He even tried to unite all under one religion Deen e ilahi, which was failure. Rajputs flourished under his reign and so their religion.

    • @veerswami7175
      @veerswami7175 Před rokem +10

      He forcefully convert one raja to Islam and his new name was naibat khan

    • @rkrkdjdj845
      @rkrkdjdj845 Před rokem +12

      @@veerswami7175 brother, he was not even himself a hardcore Muslim.

    • @JohnWick-nm6jx
      @JohnWick-nm6jx Před rokem

      Akbar Wasn't Great
      He Was Great Amongst Other Mughal Rulers .
      Every King is Not Cruel ,
      They Were The Owners Of Powers & For Their People They Used To Attack , Defend Etc . Etc .
      But The Other Kings Would Win The War & Dominate Their As Their New King
      But They Didn't Took Away Womens as Tools, Didn't Humiliated Other Religions ,
      Didn't Broke Their Religious Places & Mughals Looted Us ,
      Never Think They Rule & Lived Here They
      Just Wasted Most Of Their Money In Just Maintaining Their Luxury,
      in The Era Of. Mughals India's GDP Deteriorating & Not Increasing

    • @sugakookies1710
      @sugakookies1710 Před rokem +12

      People keep forgetting Akbar the great means Akbar was a great ruler not that he was a great person

    • @yusufs9921
      @yusufs9921 Před rokem

      Hindu kings mahaan the bas bakhi sab chootiya the. Ashoka great tha 1lakh logon ko maarne ke baad apne bhaion ko maardiya. Sab historian chootiya the bas aunty proper historian hain.

  • @thededro3352
    @thededro3352 Před rokem +13

    She knows exactly what people want to listen 😂😂

    • @Orangeapple894b
      @Orangeapple894b Před rokem +9

      What can be expected from bjp agent podcast

    • @simranpoptanii
      @simranpoptanii Před 10 měsíci

      She is right. Go do some research

    • @Orangeapple894b
      @Orangeapple894b Před 10 měsíci +2

      @@simranpoptanii No, she isn't totally correct. She is a godi type person. I have watched some of her other videos. Even his podcast is bjp agen-da friendly.

  • @nousgj4212
    @nousgj4212 Před rokem +67

    That's why there have always been controversies associated with all historical fictions made by Sanjay Leela Bhansali. Directors like him have twisted the stories in the name freedom of creativity doing gross injustice to the characters whose names and characters were based on real people who existed. There is one thing to be inspired by a historical figure create a fictional story loosely based on them. But it's another thing to take a historical figure in its entirety and completely change the intent and execution of the decisions they took in those times or to fabricate false relationship stories about them that never existed.

    • @yug4883
      @yug4883 Před rokem +1

      Sanjay Leela Bhansali showed wrong history of Bajirao Mastani also i mean according to history it's never Bajirao Mastani means marrying more than more person was common at that time, and movie didn't highlighted bravery of Bajirao

    • @vrishalisonar453
      @vrishalisonar453 Před rokem +4

      I personally find him overrated , less of brain n more of melodrama. Though good in aesthetics

    • @yug4883
      @yug4883 Před rokem +1

      @@vrishalisonar453 whom?

    • @PramodYadav-wo4zu
      @PramodYadav-wo4zu Před rokem +1

      So true. This is also the case with movie like gangubai. If u dig deeper gangubai was no social worker at all. She was a pimp and she forced woman into prostitution, so celebrate such character

    • @yug4883
      @yug4883 Před rokem +1

      @@PramodYadav-wo4zu true 😂

  • @NidhiTalks
    @NidhiTalks Před rokem

    Thank you for this podcast. 🌺

  • @Anjaney10
    @Anjaney10 Před rokem +11

    Yeah he was cruel but in that movie they showed just his love for jodha not his kindness.......kabhi kabhi suna hua or dekha hua sach nhi hota, agr galti hi cahiye to phr galtiyan hi dikhengi it's just a movie and nothing, don't be crazy

  • @mujibultanim
    @mujibultanim Před rokem +3

    she watched for only 15 minutes and then came to a conclusion, how on earth she was talking about it. I am not saying that was the perfect depiction of Akbar, but come on! someone is giving opinions based on her 15 minutes of watch time.

  • @nilrocks
    @nilrocks Před rokem

    These are so knowledgeable sessions. Thanks for such wonderful lessons.

  • @kavyasingh5671
    @kavyasingh5671 Před měsícem

    This was needed 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

  • @Dhruv_Dogra
    @Dhruv_Dogra Před rokem +47

    Medha Bhaskaran ji is a great person. She deserves the respect of every self-aware Indian.

  • @swapnarony4085
    @swapnarony4085 Před rokem +16

    90% of the kings were cruel. Kanishka and Asoka caused the bloodiest wars and after all that they did for power and with other things they went into Buddhism when they were much older. I don't see them different from our politicians today.

    • @veerswami7175
      @veerswami7175 Před rokem +6

      Ashoka was Buddhist before Kalinga war and kaniska is very unique hybrid of vaishnvaite and Buddhism faith in his reigns Buddha also considered as 9 th avatar of visnu

    • @anandpandey9988
      @anandpandey9988 Před rokem +1

      Ashok had embraced Buddhism much before Kaling war... Not in old-age.

    • @bikiron8929
      @bikiron8929 Před rokem

      Yes , so true . Most of the Kings from our history were meant to be cruel . Even many Hindu Kings fought with each other , killing millions of people. I don't understand why people have so much fascination for Kings and Kingdoms . Concepts such as Humanity , human rights etc didn't existed back then .Killing someone was a sign of bravery and power . And yes you are right there is no difference with todays politicians . It's because Kings , politicians represent the evil mindset of masses whom they represent . People make Kings ,politicians as hero because they fight for their evil causes . You can take the example of todays world leaders .

  • @sreeram3247
    @sreeram3247 Před rokem +1

    You can give the reference books madam mentioning in the description, it may help viewers to reach out to them and read.

  • @AuRoRa_28
    @AuRoRa_28 Před rokem +21

    This is exactly what my dad also said
    Thank You Ranveer for this podcast👍👍
    It's high time people understand the truth and not get brainwashed by these bolly dramas

  • @amishasingh6227
    @amishasingh6227 Před rokem +15

    good to watch as a story not as history 😍

  • @zet99darius87
    @zet99darius87 Před rokem +11

    "I m no historian" but write books about history? What?

  • @thetalltree2855
    @thetalltree2855 Před rokem +2

    Great video ranveer. Pls do a podcast on maratha invasions of bengal.

  • @LegendJoe3063
    @LegendJoe3063 Před rokem +6

    Both Akbar and Rajput were not great. End of discussion go in peace. 🤣

    • @zexer_ity
      @zexer_ity Před rokem +2

      😂 our current constitution is great that's what it is 👍😂
      Edit:- our current Administration as well

  • @niteku6448
    @niteku6448 Před rokem +8

    No king is saint

  • @chiragkumar9929
    @chiragkumar9929 Před rokem +5

    This woman sounded very ignorant. She just wanted to say her point and get it over without any facts.

  • @erwinrommel9705
    @erwinrommel9705 Před rokem +2

    Bhai ab aap improve kar rahe ho...mai pahle aapko achha host nahi samjhta tha par ab aapko dekhe achha lagta hai.

  • @priyankabm3732
    @priyankabm3732 Před rokem +1

    Your podcast topics are really amazing and very informative. Thank you for sharing the information and best content. Whenever I watch your podcast I always get involved . Keep going 👏👏 god bless you. My request from you is can you please invite Ms. Keerthihistory.

  • @Makeupbyshaiesta
    @Makeupbyshaiesta Před rokem +7

    I don’t agree with her.
    Being a ruler , they had to do so many things NOT only Mughals but every king.
    In our country only we had so many cruel kings we should name them as well.

    • @nishugowda6172
      @nishugowda6172 Před rokem +2

      We had cruel kings but not cruel as mughals.
      Ashoka was a cruel king in terms of war but he made great work towards his kingdom and respected women. He married many but with consent for political reason.
      But akbar had 1000 women in h8s haram apart from 300 wives. He used to capture ladies in war. Killed lakhs of hindus because they didnt convert

  • @ManishSharma-yu5jh
    @ManishSharma-yu5jh Před rokem +6

    I wonder why different historians differ in their opinions so much if the source of information is same, like the Akbarnama.

    • @seerlavenkatapriyanka
      @seerlavenkatapriyanka Před rokem

      Good point. It depends on how we see and understand. Everyone have their own point of view. The one statement which 3 people listen will take it in 3 different ways and understand it in 3 different ways

  • @KomalSingh-tu5ss
    @KomalSingh-tu5ss Před rokem +1

    Ranveer sir u r the best public speaker. Thankuuu for every videos.

  • @tiscachip
    @tiscachip Před rokem +2

    This episode is the most engaging one of all..infact best podcast ever

  • @zerogravity239
    @zerogravity239 Před rokem +21

    "Killing subordinates and taking their women" 🙄 Great

  • @TheStarcrush
    @TheStarcrush Před rokem +4

    Name a king that won battles with love

    • @sanaksanandan
      @sanaksanandan Před rokem +2

      It's not about the violence in battles. It's the violence outside the battle field that they unleashed, on civilians. That's the difference between a good king, and an evil one.

    • @Vajrapani108
      @Vajrapani108 Před rokem

      Killing soldiers in battle=/= killing civilans and raping women

    • @rgseven6557
      @rgseven6557 Před 4 měsíci +1

      You missed the point

  • @midhunramachandran5131
    @midhunramachandran5131 Před rokem +2

    it's simple that there are lot of funding happens from east Asian countries especially on our cinee industry.... really hatsoff to this lady to talk the truth openly and you pplz are boldly telecasting it... congrats buddy

  • @satishkumar-xt5fe
    @satishkumar-xt5fe Před rokem +1

    It's always difficult even with the best of the historians to cleary depict the picture of what would have happened in past as they have their limitations. It's even more difficult to interpretate the happening of the past as many tend to be biased and are guided by irrational thinking patterns.

  • @sinshu5269
    @sinshu5269 Před rokem +28

    I love the work "Keyboard Warrior" 😂😂😂

  • @tanupriya83
    @tanupriya83 Před rokem +14

    I don't think it is the job of Bollywood to teach History. People should read the books and documentaries.

    • @barkhaagarwalla
      @barkhaagarwalla Před rokem +3

      Correct. At the same time they should not tamper with history in the name of creative liberty. But all in all, to get knowledge on any subject, Bollywood should definitely be the last resource.

    • @anonymousboy8802
      @anonymousboy8802 Před rokem +5

      yeah sure get ur history lessons from a microbiologist n not from a historian😂😂

    • @timothyjohnson5999
      @timothyjohnson5999 Před rokem +4

      But it is their job to show the truth if they are making a historical film

    • @Vajrapani108
      @Vajrapani108 Před rokem +1

      Exactly! Job of bollywood is to spread lie and propganda instead 🤓🤓🤓

    • @anahita934
      @anahita934 Před rokem +2

      @@anonymousboy8802 leftist historian ko hum kyun mane jab ki primary source available hai.. Aur primary source me wohi likha hai jo ye ma'am bata rahi hai.

  • @ankitsood3815
    @ankitsood3815 Před rokem +2

    Now she is speaking negatively about a mughal emperor. Not arguing whether he was or not. But now the comment section is positive compared to Aurangzeb one. Something to think about.

  • @sangeetabansal8175
    @sangeetabansal8175 Před rokem

    I would like to listen more from Medha ji. I m from South Mumbai

  • @inderguruwada1760
    @inderguruwada1760 Před rokem +8

    An eye opener. Youth must watch. Do not take movies seriously 😄

  • @jf1341
    @jf1341 Před rokem +4

    0:48 does not cite which book

  • @NeerajKumar-dk1tk
    @NeerajKumar-dk1tk Před rokem +32

    Invite Neeraj Atri ... he has very knowledge over history , religion and NCRT..... you will get at least 150 podcast from that person and you will become fan of that person the way and depth he talk

  • @HKG432
    @HKG432 Před rokem +2

    I have won an award so I know everything, you don't know? What's this bias statement?

  • @mmmusicmeditation999
    @mmmusicmeditation999 Před rokem +8

    Mam is totally completely right.... The histories are all twisted..... Congrats Mam

  • @irb911
    @irb911 Před rokem +3

    Movies are about entertainment. Not about the "truth". Watch movies for entertainment. If you want to know the truth READ the right books.
    People who watch movies and accept them as historical fact need therapy.

  • @galimir
    @galimir Před rokem +11

    who cares? Jodhaa Akbar was an amazing movie ;)

  • @Kavitva
    @Kavitva Před rokem

    Hello Mister, what about the second part of this video?

  • @saif9765
    @saif9765 Před rokem +1

    Please give the references !!!

  • @Ipinguthepenguin
    @Ipinguthepenguin Před rokem +15

    No offence whatsoever
    The lady also wasnt present during Akbar's time.
    So framed opinion based on a subjective narrative can be ignored.
    Thats why history podcast are worst.
    Limelight hoggers are those who come up with a new version of every story which only they have red.
    Since none of us were present during those days, conclusion cant be framed like that.

    • @nabyendu16
      @nabyendu16 Před rokem +2

      There are history references of that period which helps to reach the conclusions

    • @pranjali991
      @pranjali991 Před rokem +1

      fully agree

    • @santhoshreddy3882
      @santhoshreddy3882 Před rokem +3

      Hey Pingu Paangu there is no evidence that you were born to your own father that doesn't mean you are not your father's son same logic applies to your rhetoric statement.

    • @Ipinguthepenguin
      @Ipinguthepenguin Před rokem +2

      @@santhoshreddy3882 where you there to validate your claims?
      Atleast i have people around to figure out my birth.
      So correct your senses and stop passing judgements.

    • @siyachakravarti4825
      @siyachakravarti4825 Před rokem +3

      @@Ipinguthepenguin their are evidence to back the lady claims.... Go read it and dont show ur poor brain capabilities in comments
      Also ur logic through comments are equally funny like ur name pengu

  • @priyankashelar2220
    @priyankashelar2220 Před 10 měsíci +15

    "Not every historical characters are great " but chhatrapati shivaji maharaj😊🙏

  • @agastyaalphonse2548
    @agastyaalphonse2548 Před rokem +1

    Ma'am I agree with you..

  • @kartikvv
    @kartikvv Před rokem +1

    You should take this feedback and confront the makers of such bollywood masala historicals. That will be fun

  • @KMILIND
    @KMILIND Před rokem +9

    There is a disclaimer after the film, people miss that. Besides it’s a fiction at least that mond we should apply as audience.

  • @sandeepraman4469
    @sandeepraman4469 Před rokem +21

    The films she named were not claimed as "Based on true story" it was just a movie. See people are real sensitive about such factors and can't appreciate art. This movie is just a story, and a story is completely one's perception. The movie makers made this film based on thier perceptions, never on the facts and never claimed. If you miss judged this, and if Akbar for you is Hrithik Roshan, you should probably blame your history teacher for it.

    • @mAviralbhanu
      @mAviralbhanu Před rokem +19

      As she said, for viewers a fiction presented as history will become real history for the viewer who is unaware. This is because viewer will not be able to filter what is real and what is fiction. So since it sets rhetorics and changes people's idea of reality, hence can not be called art for sure. Can be called a propoganda though.

    • @Dennis56781000
      @Dennis56781000 Před rokem +3

      ​@@mAviralbhanu Agreed, a normal Joe in India subconsciously accepts whatever shown on the TV as the plain truth. The idea that they are being played doesn't even strike their mind.
      After watching Prithviraj I told my grandfather that it was fake. He didn't believe me Lol. And he was a senior officer in the govt in his heyday.
      That's why films need to be countered with utmost religiosity.

    • @mAviralbhanu
      @mAviralbhanu Před rokem +1

      @@Dennis56781000 viewers can be foreigners as well. This confuses people abroad, because they can't reason out why Indians are romanticising invaders. I mean, nobody romanticise hitler or stalin in name of art.

    • @Dennis56781000
      @Dennis56781000 Před rokem

      @@mAviralbhanu I don't think foreigners pay that much attention to us tbh. They'd properly start noticing us when we have solid hard power, just like they're noticing China right now. Maybe in the future!
      I see Bollywood as a primarily tool to control domestic narratives. The usual trope being sterilize the majority community by challenging their faith, practices etc and glorify only the minority abrahamic faiths. Minority Indic faiths like Buddhism and Jainism are not even mentioned at all and Sikh characters are stereotyped and used for comic relief.

    • @sandeepraman4469
      @sandeepraman4469 Před rokem +1

      @@mAviralbhanu that's true. The message sometimes is not clear. But there are many movie makers who successfully announced indirectly that it's thier perception of the whole event.

  • @Canseefornewchange
    @Canseefornewchange Před rokem +1

    Thanks for bringing the truth to light 🔥❤️ bollywood deserves boycott

  • @Mn-px2ji
    @Mn-px2ji Před rokem

    Can u plz make a podcast on bhoota kola which is based on Manglorean culture and recent movie KANTARA

  • @dimplesharmalyngdoh628
    @dimplesharmalyngdoh628 Před rokem +3

    But when I studied in school, our history books was written that Akbar was kind.. And a great diplomatic

    • @rex6418
      @rex6418 Před rokem

      Because the books have not been written by Hindu or Muslim.
      It is written by the Marxist.The Marxist were athiest who used to find loopholes on religious books.
      Dividing the Hindu-Muslim
      But both the right and left wingers realise it
      If if you feel I am wrong
      Check the election results from 1951 to 1992
      You will always find cpi/cpi-cm as opposition.

  • @vartikashukla4693
    @vartikashukla4693 Před rokem +5

    And some peacefuls beleive Mughals were their ancestors and treat them as ideals.....🥴🥴🥵🥵

  • @chandanimishra855
    @chandanimishra855 Před rokem +2

    I agree with her ❤️

  • @expeditioner9322
    @expeditioner9322 Před rokem +2

    Was there any king who ruled over large tracts and his rule did not involve any torture?

  • @crazycrackheadbubblegums9959

    Sorry but people also want to depict dramas on films. The historian doesn't know themselves. They just archeological evidence .

  • @KAHLAN54
    @KAHLAN54 Před rokem +6

    I stand unbiased. I am not taking sides. But whenever, some opinions are made it ought to be backed by appropriate proof.

  • @thefoodpriest6614
    @thefoodpriest6614 Před rokem +2

    Also paying real attention to the concept of half-truth by Medha

  • @ganjiganesh7706
    @ganjiganesh7706 Před rokem

    Ofcourse!!

  • @kdjimmy103
    @kdjimmy103 Před rokem +6

    Hope we don't get all the sides to see of a king other side too not much but little in movie will do

  • @reetikasidana3784
    @reetikasidana3784 Před rokem

    I would like to read the book which she is talking about . Pls share the details

  • @checkalpha
    @checkalpha Před rokem +2

    You should do interview with Mr Manu S Pillai he is a young historian he can give a lot of historical facts
    His book the ivory throne was good to read about kings and queens of Kerala

  • @mediwana
    @mediwana Před rokem +4

    2:15
    Hiatory ke bare me ham poora sach kabhi nhi mil sakta.... Kabhi nhi ..... Yha ek din ki incident par hajoro concipracy creat kr di jati hai.... Akabar jodha to kitne saal ho gyw.... So simple.... Kuch bhi pure nhi hai.....

  • @jordanthepeoplessinger7845

    Interview should be mostly in Hindi soo many people from various parts of our country understand these reality in a better way

  • @sreyanshrathore8906
    @sreyanshrathore8906 Před rokem +2

    Jodha is not wife of Akbar as a rajput i feel ashamed that they literally showing false history.

  • @nikhilyn144
    @nikhilyn144 Před rokem +5

    His history reference of Akbar is Jodha Akbar and Hrithik Roshan 😌..my God