Mughal Torture Story - How A Father Destroyed His Son's Life Out Of Jealousy
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 09. 2024
- Watch The Full Episode Here: • Aurangzeb & Shivaji Ma...
Listen To The Full Episode On Spotify: open.spotify.c...
🎧 Listen To #TheRanveerShow On Spotify:
open.spotify.c...
Check out my Meditation app: Level SuperMind
Get Android - bit.ly/Android...
Get iOS - apple.co/3SyiPcE
Know more about Level :
bit.ly/levelli...
Follow Medha Bhaskaran's Social Media Handles:-
Instagram: / medha.deshmukh.bhaskaran
Facebook: / medha.bhaskaran
Twitter: / medhadb
LinkedIn: / medha-bhaskaran-467ba2139
✅ Subscribe To Our Other CZcams Channels:-
BeerBiceps (English Channel):
/ beerbicepsofficial
Ranveer Allahbadia (Hindi Channel):
/ ranveerallahbadia
TRS Clips हिंदी (Hindi Podcast Highlights):
/ @theranveershowhindi
BeerBiceps Shorts (English Shorts):
/ @bestoftrs
Ranveer Allahbadia Shorts (Hindi Shorts):
/ @bestoftrshindi
BigBrainco. :
/ @raaazofficial
BigBrainco. Shorts :
/ @raaazclips
Welcome to the 3-part special on the story of Shivaji Maharaj, always waited to present this to the audience. Our guest today is Medha Bhaskaran, a microbiologist, an author, and another all-star of The Ranveer Show. The wealth of knowledge she has is truly incredible, honoured to host Medha ma'am at our space for such fantastic episodes we created with her. In this episode, we go into the depths of the Mughal empire, before the Shivaji Maharaj era, and what was the country's socio-economic status back then, what was the reality of the kings and the emperors who ruled our land mass. REAL Stories Of Indian History Uncovered - Watch out.
Medha Bhaskaran, from the year 2000 onwards, started studying Mughal Maratha history as she felt passionate about it. More than a hundred books were referred to, forts visited, and discussions with historians, weapon experts and other people involved in the subjects continued. She is the author of Shivaji's bestselling biography, Challenging Destiny. Amazon Link: www.amazon.in/....
This episode is a 3-part conversation starting from the rule of the Mughal Empire, before the Shivaji Maharaj era, then part 2 where we talk about the times when India saw the rise of Shivaji Maharaj, and then comes part 3 where we talk about his final vision. Stay Tuned as Part 2 and Part 3 of this series will be released in the following two Tuesdays of the Month of October.
#mughalempire #1634
INSTAGRAM : @beerbiceps
/ beerbiceps
FACEBOOK : @beerbiceps
/ beerbiceps
TWITTER : @beerbicepsguy
/ beerbicepsguy
LINKEDIN : @beerbiceps
/ beerbiceps
TELEGRAM: @beerbicepsguy
t.me/beerbicep...
SNAPCHAT: @beerbicepsguy
----------------------------------------------
About :
TRS Clips is a collection of SHORT CLIPS from The Ranveer Show podcast. Enjoy our latest knowledge-fueled videos from the BeerBiceps team. Every conversation on #TheRanveerShow is intellectual, deep & progressive. We cover everyone from entrepreneurs to Bollywood film stars to even athletes.
Today, The Ranveer Show or TRS - Happiness Through Curiosity. A show where we host the world's greatest success stories and try digging out their secrets to success. Every conversation is an EXTREME learning experience for the viewer.
Check out my Meditation app: Level SuperMind
Get Android - bit.ly/AndroidApp_Link
Get iOS - apple.co/3SyiPcE
Know more about Level :
bit.ly/levellinktree
Jahangir is the same person who tortured and martyred 5 th sikh guru arjan Dev g and Chandu played an equal role
Yeah but some peacefuls in the comment would like some proof of this as well
Ya lekin aajkal Sardar mullo aur Christians ko zyada pyaar karte. Yaad bhi nahi inko ke ye humare bade bhai hi hain har ghar ka bada bhai Sikh bana tha aur kitna torture Kiya tha sab guruo ko mullo aur Christians ko. Jo ye yaad ni rakhte wo kaha ke Sikh.
And now some of the Sikhs are working with support of the Islamic groups to fight against there own people (Hindus ) ,forgetting that the Sikh gurus give up there own lives and sacrificed so much to keep india safe from the venom of islamists
Muslim don't even like jahangir.
Muslim love babur, arungzab and shah bahader.
@Burgiana Tamir was a person with the most self respect. He was pure Muslim and brave warrior and he defiene the word brave.
He belive in win or die in the war.
So true, how can people sing glory to these people.but in history books of India they are mahatmas
Specially the liberal + pseudo secular gand
Ashok also killed 99 cousins and one own brother for the throne any comments on that??or u are a hypocrite!!!
Which history books did u read?
No where in our ICSE books have the glorified mughals... They just stated what it was
Now for further detailed information into the subject I suppose one has to be a History major in college.. That info which was given to students doing Masters in History will not be available to class 9-10 students
It's the same for Biology and Medical Science
@@prateekshome no they indeed glorified them, see movies and in books also it is discussed iska beta falana dhimkaana and they were great kings 4-5 years ago i believed they were great..
@@dj-ux1jr the education board doesn't make movies
And movies are made to earn money... So of course they will show what pleasures the eye
And there is no point in disregarding that they were emperors... Similarly there were plenty of Hindu kings and dynasties too
I read about Guptas and Mauryas...that too in adequate detail of a class 8 student
Maybe u didnt
Even the serial Jodha Akbar glorifies the king and in a subtle way demeans maharana pratap by showing akbar is righteous and all.....
So?
shravya akbar was probalbly the most tolerant of all those muslim kings .
becoz hindus were ignorant lot and believed congress which inturn connived with the education minister maulanas to bring to books only glorifying the muslim rulers
@@lissyjohn7619 Like most tolerant as in, *Sheeshganj* in Delhi where he piled heads of fallen soldiers, ref-- He *beheaded* an unconscious *Commander Vikramaditya Hemu Chandra* out of revenge for losing the previous battle, then went on to kill EVERY soldier under his command (against laws of battle) displayed headless bodies in Delhi as a lesson.
@@lissyjohn7619 or may be tolerant as in only killed *30000 hindu peasant families* (civilians) out of revenge in the battle of *Chittodgadh* where women of Chittod did *Juahar* , because he wanted to marry the daughter of Chittodgadh's King.
Absolute facts of Mughal family. Most of the daughters from Mughal family remained unmarried for lifetime, the reason behind it was they don't want son-in-laws also in power struggle along with sons, brothers and nephews.
Lol the Rajputs were no Saints either. Everyone was the same maybe to different extents.
@@Ranger-ly5qf why are you so afraid of rajput
The actual reason was different tho, the sultans liked to boink their own daughters. Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb did it undeniably
@@tanmaysingh2005 I’m just telling the Truth. And there is nothing to be afraid about rajputs 😂
@@Ranger-ly5qf no comparison with Mughals and rajputs.
There's saying for Mughals " Takht ya Taabut" meaning " Throne or Grave"
Yes. "Sword was arbitrar of throne" Even today you can see this in bangla, afgan pak and other fanatic countries! "Mughul culture" that is!
The moment you touched on this part of History, words like BJP, RSS, propaganda are coming in the comment section.
Correct......
Tum apne nakli khayalo me khush raho@kjknvbnnn
Urduwood, Irfan and Romila great job for showing murderer's as peaceful in our books 📚 and Movies📽️
Peaceful and murder can be the same thing
Chu**ya hai tu.. Rajputs, Mughals, Marathas, Har kisi ne Throne ke lalaj me khud ke, Bothers, relatives.. ko kill.. kya.
@@bellatordei3440 no it's not the same
@@MW-lb2dz you kill rebels in order to preserve peace
Sir this romill tapur irfan habib habibur rahaman are all fake historians and created false narrative thinking that truth can be suppressed ever. They are fully exposed for their falshood and lies fed to indian people since 70 years. Now they have proved how bogus they are? Are they mercenaries and farce historians!?
And these barbaric mughal stories were taught to us in our schools.
Because like it or not its a part of energy
I don’t have words for muslims who name their children after tyrant Jhahangir, Timur…😳
Kareena is an arrogant illiterate with an overinflated ego. We should not be paying attention to such people.
unless Hindus doesn't make such actors pay for their insolence nothing will change.
Obviously before them these names existed, also people are not only bad or good, that's like to ask why there so many people naming their child's Adolf or Joseph
There are lakhs of people with same name and different personalities. Naming a child Abdul would not make him a scientist.
@@pallavisharma8309 its the ideology behind naming their children after tyrants, not expecting their children to become them. These people’s sole motive is to spread their venomous thinking through idolising such dreadful personalities.
I wish this goes international
Ooohh.. I wish
As a Pakistani I wanna tell you something majority Don't even praise them or think of them as good kings it's only Indian who are realising it now due to grace of Bollywood
Most of info in wikipedia.
In NCERT; For mughals - Entire Chapter
For Marathas - Single Topic
Because Mughal was empire and Maratha was a kingdom. ONly Guptas , Mauryan and Mughals were truly empire for over 200 years
@@PiLaminar so few paragraphs are enough for Study of Marathas..??
@@darkranger9475 If we start studying every ruler with details, you end up studying history throughout our life. Do you want your children just to study History? We are still in the middle bof third world War with left and Islam against us
Maratha empire was most powerful anyways❤@@PiLaminar
In class 7th icse there is a whole chapter for akbar and aurangzeb.
After later mughal(mughal after aurangzeb)
Next chapter named is east India Company.
No mention of marathas empire and ahoms
I'm forgetting the exact name but there was this one senior royal woman in the Mughal Empire who had objected to Khusrau being handed to Khurram (later Shah Jahan) as she knew that Shah Jahan would kill him. She said that it would start a procedure where Mughals would execute their entire families to become Emperor.
If you look back before Jahangir, Humayun and Akbar had both faced rebellions from their brothers. But they both never executed their brothers, instead stripping them of their privileges and asking them to go for pilgrimage to Mecca. When Jahangir became Emperor, his two brothers Murad and Daniyal had already died. But Shah Jahan started killing his brothers and by 1628, he had killed all his brothers (Khusrau, Parvez, Shahryar). Shah Jahan then also executed Hoshang Mirza and Dawar Baksh, the sons of his uncles Murad and Daniyal.
Later on these actions would come back to haunt Shah Jahan, when he would be deposed by his own son Aurangzeb. Aurangzeb killed Shah Jahan's favourite son, Dara Shukoh along with Shah Jahan's other sons. Aurangzeb also killed Dara's son Suleiman who Shah Jahan had considered the 7th Emperor.
It was nur jahan
@@asfarahmad1688no.. it was salim's mother....Noor Jehan is her daughter to law
@@Proud_Malayalee It was Jodha bai aka Harka Bai aka Marium Uzamani
Ranveer ji❤️ lv u beautifully well made love the way you represent
This is just awesome, the concept of short clips just amazing ❤
I think today we can sit and jugde everything.. but back in the day life was only this . The war to get the throne was everything.. ppl thinking and mind sets evolve with time... May be 1000 yearz later ppl will feel we were alzo so wrong .
Religion has nothing to do with violent kings. All kings and dictators are violent because they have absolute power
Listening the actual truth... Thanks you
"Religion of Peace"
What an irony
🤣😂🤣😂
Great explaination 🔥
first view ....enjoying all your informating podcasts
Ashoka was also very cruel who killed 2 lakh people in Kalinga (modern day Orissa). It is only after this that he had a change of heart and he adopted Buddhism. Pushyamitra Sunga, the last emperor of Mauryan dynasty, killed thousands of peaceful Buddhist monks of India and destroyed their monasteries. So cruelty is not confined to Muslim kings. Any king will become cruel if you get in his way.
Pushyamitra was not a mauryan ruler , he became emperor by killing his own king thereby ending mauryan dynasty .Also getting your own son's eyes out and playing cheap tricks to win battles was very common in mughal rulers than Hindu rulers , which is a fact🙂
Asoka did not have any change of heart. Asoka was a Buddhist way before Kalinga war. Asoka killed his own brother because he was a Jain monk. He killed his another brother and usurped the throne.
So Asoka persecuted both Hindus and Jains.
Also stop defending Mughals and Islamic rulers. Know that you are also defending slave trade done by them.
Not all kings are cruel. Don't generalize just to defend your favourite Islamic rulers.
Yes Ashok was very cruel and remorseless and he was Buddhist before kalinga war, Pushyamitra sungha didn't persecute Budhhist the way he is portrayed, there's a podcast on vaad channel regarding that. The topic here is whether Mughals were the way mainstream media portrays them or they were very cruel. Comparing their cruelty to ancient indian kings is like comparing cycle with motorbikes. They were sadists.
She is not doing hindu vs muslim there.
They were discussing about mughal empire
Most of info in wikipedia like about khusro. shah jahan war of succesion.
These kinds of people intentionally try to disrespect the mughal period. Yes there are so many nasty incidents in this dynasty but the present day so called historians try to assert that the mughals being muslim were very cruel. But I respectfully wish this lady to remember the life of Great Ashoka. How many murders he did to gain crown? Just only because of someone's religion you cannot defame that person. If you want to depict the history properly please donot act like pseudo hindus of a particular political party.
In Bengal posto or poppy seeds (obtained from opium ) is eaten as an item called Posto Vada i.e poppy seeds fritters from ancient times till date ,but now it's very rare as poppy seeds are quite expensive and it's very rare dishes one could find in a middle class bengalee families
My mom fed me one in the Siddheswari Pice Hotel, and that's very good
Posto bata bolchis ki ??? Posto vada ki hoye
Wait, are they by chance called khash khash ??
Mughal e Azam is not historical.. it's a legend... but it's a great movie/story. Bollywood movies should be judged for it's historical correctness only if they claim it.
What a truth known through a good content on CZcams. History should be told as it is !!! But unfortunately in schools it wasn't!! Thanks for letting us know the real truth about some big Mughal emperor like akhbar 👍🏻
Fun fact: Jahangir (salim) had 50% of hindu rajput DNA in his blood. 😂
Women were never harmed in mughal Era.
Real truth of peaceful community.
Beauty of Peaceful religion...
Remind me of Shiva beheading his son for playing around him....and parshuram l!nching his own mother just becoz his monster father asked him to do so......and surprisingly there is religion where these monster r called bhagwan or God.
@@randomthought2026 Well you don't believe in out mythology i guess...or do you ? Its your history i am not talking about, your mythology is scrap and you are not a Mughal though, bloody converted.
@@Deep_aadmi hmm.. I m not a Mughal obviously they happened to be in power before Britishers..... convert... what's that ...u mean my ancestors were Hindu and u r aurangzeb ki aulaad?
There is no religion involved
Ok
Very correct. Very good
She was there's at that time ..... And time traveled to explain now...
Jo tune parha hai wo tujhe jahangir ney btaya kya?
She educated unlike you people
Peacefuls.
This happens when you read history first time , just read power struggle of every empire ,it is common thing in that era
@@onso9898 I read my history where family, respect etc comes to mind. I learn my respect from Mariyada Purush like Ram who will walk away from everything to honour his father’s words.
My history and my hero’s for me.
Yours. You choose. How is Porkistan?
@@onso9898 sorry
Didn't happen in the reign of Shivaji Maharaj.
That's mythology. And even he didn't trust sita.. Asked her to take a loyalty test. And he killed Shudra Ascetic Shambuka just because he was attempting to perform tapas.
@@zeeshanhaider1303 who are you to say it was mythology. How dare you?. And do you think momad said all truth.. do you think allah really talked woth him or he had schizophrenia
If Jahangir can punish like that to his own son for being a Revolutionary, how could he have left the others who have helped him?
Cruelty is in his blood, From Taimur to Genghis khan, From Babar to Akbar.
& Call it anything but it's the thing which is essential to sustain 'The Empire'.
Bro Kushrau Didn't liked jahangir and also wanted to kill him ... Jahangir had two sons Khurram and Kushrav if he was really wanted to take everything he would have killed sah jahan as well but why do you think he didn't do it??If your chind want to kill waht would you do in that situation??
Finallyyyyy someone talking about it... Otherwise hmara Bollywood hi in logo ki glory gate h aur hmare religion and history ki baizzati krte h 😐
I just remembered rajput and sikhs ❤ who’s sacrificed there have no place for debate for mughal and Afghan
Somewhere down the line these terrorists preaching killing innocents in the name of jannat naseeb hone ka rasta have cruelty in their DNA.
The way she's explaining like she has seen everything that happened is just awesome, cause it feels wayy more interesting to listen to her !!
She rightly said either throne or grave was the fate of prince.
But then Asoka the great is also believed to kill his 100 brothers
yesssss
yes but that is only once happened in our entire santana history
@@ManishSharma-tc2ue never heard of cholas ? Pandavas ? Etc?
@@prodigalfraudaddy i know all about them, bu there is a difference cholas fought Pandavas. It had never been a messacre that involve chola or pandaya dyansty killed their own in mass scale
Prince Khusrau was the favourite choice of Akbar to succed him because he was capable, handsome and secular. He was a brave warrior and loved by the Indian masses due to his liberal views.
Dara shikoh was identical to khusro in mentality and character ,after all he was his nephew .in destiny also they were same .among Hindus there was an escape route .some princes became sanyassis to avoid being killed . History records that the magadhan royals were parricide during ajatashatru who killed his father bimbisar .there were 6or 8 generation of parricide before the people overthrew those parricide Dynasty and became a janpad ie republic till mahapadmanand the barber killed the old king .chanakya came one generation later to overthrow nandas .rest is recorded history .
Aur ye aurat waha khadi ho kr dhek rhi h .. aur isne document kr liye😂😂
Wanderful information 👍👍
the communication of this lady is so poor
Those Muslims are fool in my point of view who think that Mughal Empire was Muslim and supported or still support and try to defend them.
Truly great content
It's either kill or get killed. At certain point for many it was not just greed for power, but the power for survival. Honestly I feel we cannot just blame one particular emperor for the cruelty, cruel was (or still is) the society (also can't overlook their lineage genetics). Romanticizing such stories are honestly laughable. Historical romance genre is no doubt appealing, but being irresponsible towards the public and the real history is utterly shameful and ridiculous.
This is very common among mughal. Main reason was greed for throne money and power generally see their kin as threat to the throne . They won't mind killing their sons brothers for power and money.they killed their kin in brutal way taking eyes off.... Even killing blinded kin.
Please make a podcast regarding the life of Kunwar Durjan Singh ...pls
Har Har Mahadev!
Wow totally amazed with all the facts
If you are "Amazed" by these facts then surely you were sicular hindu before this.
@@AM-zk6ue nah bro I am still secular but I wasn't secular on cost of my religion
I respect their religion as much as they respect ours.
I love their festivals as much they love ours.
@@NerdyNerve They don't. Anyways, for Akbar, search for Rahul Arya on Akbar
He rebelled against his father took over Mughal territory And tried to overthrow his father, so he caught him and partially blinded him and imprisoned him.
These are medieval rulers with things expected from them. They are glorified not for what they did personally but the battles they fought the extent of the empire the wealth they created the architecture they made the stability in politics they brought. They were such strong empire even distant middle east and europeans were scared of them. The british were so amazed that they borrowed the word mogul into their dictionary to explain anything huge. Political infighting, killing relatives for power, religious intolerance, multiple wives and not giving respect to women those days were so common. Pushyamitra sangha, dhana nanda, chandragupta maurya, ashoka, bimbisara, ajathshatru, raghoji bhonsle, tarabai(who disguised her son for power), mihirakaula all are in this category. Hindu s desecrating buddhist temples or muslims breaking hindu temples os all we talk about but what about pallava ruler narasimhavarman sacking chalukya temples, the chandella s looting pratihara temples.
It is the tyrion lannister s words “ things are expected of them”. They were medieval rulers displaying power looting wealth for themselves not independent democratic international boundary respect worthy civilized working salaried professionals in the internet judging humanity and violence over power in history
To be huge and to be righteous is a different thing. There may be incidences of wars in all cultures but there has been no incidences of family-in-fighting. Also, if they should be glorified for their architecture, they should also show the family fighting and also, the battles and what they took. You say mediaeval rulers, look at all islamic countries and check how they get succeeded. It is their religion not the period of time.
@@TheStoicsChannel i wrote those names for a reason . No incidences of family infighting? Please google each of them. All are examples of family infighting and religious persecution and cruelty too… not warfare. Since you apoke of culture il add another name. Kauravas and Pandavas. Also know about Soyabai and Rajaram and the succession story after shivaji s death. And shah jahan, Aurangzeb and khilji succession stories are popular not just in history books but also in folklore and drammas. Else medha wouldnt know it either. I am sorry if you werent aware of it. But so are the horrific succession stories of bimbisara and ashoka . All kings did this. In History theres a popular saying- either eat or get eaten. It holds true for Alexander to Napoleon to Vikramaditya to muhhals and khiljis and everyone. And i didnt understand islamic countries successful? Successful in what? How is that related to moghuls?
@@aishwaryasDiaries chatrapati shivaji maharaj had two sons , none of them pocked each other's eyes out , never happened in entire lineage of maratha rulers , you are making a false equivalence. You should get your knowledge crosschecked from different sources .
@@pigeonlover935 no they never pop out each others eyes but war of succession did break out between his successors. Family infighting was the point not popping out eyes. And the Marathas at Shivaji s time were just establishing the empire werent that rich like Mughals with harem full of kids and too many successors. 2 sons and even they wanted control. Infighting is natural whenever there is power struggle. Infact sambhaji had defected to the mughals while shivaji was alive only to return unrepentant. There are stories of Soyabai trying to put Rajaram on throne by poisoning him. Sambhaji took control of Raigad fort and imprisoned Rajaram, his wife and Soyabai and killed the commander to become a king. Sambhaji even went ahead to execute his step mom Soyabai. Its ok to rever a figure and worship but its not okay to remove a part of the history to prove the pedestal your putting them in. Infact after so many points I had put, so many names I took you had to bring “popping out eyes in Maratha empire” which I never said.
@@aishwaryasDiariesWell among hindu kings, there was a rule that the eldest son should succeed the father as king, 2nd, 3rd sons were given royal titles & made satraps of small kingdoms.All other relatives were also given royal titles and authority. So succession was mostly peaceful, cooperative, harmonious and mostly celebratory, there used to be week long celebrations when the crown prince was made king. But there was no such rule among muslim rulers, Like the lady in the vdo said, it was free for all, hence the succession was always brutal and gruesome and heartwrenching.
Too much for those naive side profile portraits holding rose😂😂💀
😂😂😭
Unfortunately there are still some hypocrite Indians who are proud on this cruel creature's action. There is a famous Bollywood couples who named their son after this cruel creature Jahangir and gave a statement that they named their son after a great ruler whom they are proud
Do a podcast on caste system
Hard times requires hard mens... Everybody fought with each other then for the throne
They didn't fight each other, they fought their own blood
@@k.999 👍
The problem is not that they killed their own brothers for throne considering that time's point of view but today's people glorifying him as the great righteous and just ruler.......
@@shravyaamin8346 He didn't only do injustices which were required to gain power but also injustices which were also useless and ruthless
@@k.999 💯💯
For a reason people are happy for Bollywood downfall 🗿 0:01
Like Hindu Samrat Ashoka killed his own brothers brutally.
According to her, all Hindu rulers were saints, while all Muslim rulers who ruled India for thousands of years were brutal invaders. What a logic based on his logic.
isnt this true for any empire.
Khosru was blinded after revolt against his father.
She is negatively biased on Mughals
What's more atrocious than the mughal history she mentions is her english. Couldn't they have done the interview in hindi and added subtitles later?
so basically rajput fought with no one and lost the war 😂😂😂
Is she a school teacher?
Please request speakers to quote the source of their historic recollection. Would like to know the difference between story and fact
They treat their own brother's like this,then how would they have treated normal citizens
Not going to lie... i kind of want to see love bollywood film on Hitler...
Part 2 kadhi yenar aahe ranveer bhau..??
Shah jaha later was named as jahangir killed his own son for kingship
.
Jahangir, is the father of Shah Jahan...what you're saying? Salim later became Jahangir
Very shallow knowledge of the lady
Cant stand the discussion
Because she is not praising . Doesn't suit leftist agenda
I still don't see what's the problem of making romantic movies about them, people are not good or bad
Problem is don't white wash them by showing some different history......They might be great warriors but that doesn't mean they were kind person......Half truth is nothing but a lie......Many a times their marriage was just political setting or captured woman just because they captured a territory so to romanticize these things is wrong.......Stop making your own stories especially with historic characters.......If you want to make love stories make fictional ones......
@@madhushriparab1409 stop morally judging people with your modern morality.
Once I watched film about the romance between sultan suleiman and hurrem sultan without showing his cruelties and I don't have anything against it
@@bellatordei3440 modern morality?? I didn't knew morals also come as ancient or modern tags....... What was bad is bad......He may be a powerful king but that doesn't make him a kind human......If he was cruel he was.......My problem is they are changing history just to make him a romantic hero which has no proof what so ever and showing it as reality which was not the case.......
@@madhushriparab1409 in the pat were normal lots of things we now consider as bad, if someone is cruel, that doesn't mean he can't be romantic
@@bellatordei3440 i really doubt that but if you feel that way then good for you....... Because the cruel people are usually tend to get what they want by hook or by crook....... Yeah if their wives are ready then it's good or what other choice they had especially if someone is cruel....... Fear n helplessness overpowered love n romance......Why a normal decent human being will ever be in love with some cruel, power hungry person.......My point is why are you making something romantic when it was just a political arrangements......N if you want to make a romantic film make a fictional one why to make with historic characters
I don't know why we sung the glory of Hindu kings like
Ajatshatru who killed his own father
And later on his son Viiddudhabha who killed him.
And why we praise ASHOKA as title him as great Ashoka who killed his own 99 brothers as per Ashokvadana..
Why to praise Chandragupta II even if he had a huge brothel..
There is book
Political Violence in Ancient India.. where historian Upinder Singh developed great chapters revealing the massacres by hindu kings..
But this lady is still has a doubt on Mughals only... She is just a biased woman who is misguiding commoners.. and who can't be considered as a scholar.
Why we can't blame colonialism as like we do to Mughals or Sultans..
Why we can't blame the Hunas who were also invaders but had a mix breed with Indians and turned to be later JAATS
Why we blame Aryans or so called real blood Brahmin.. as they were the first who invaded too.. even a brahmin like Bal Gangadhar Tilak accepted that not India but Arctic was there real home....
Please I request you sir don't support such people who try show this fake stunt of unqualified knowledge.
Be proud of culture where family and neighbour is respected and can co exist.
Akbar's cousin was Azam Khan, and he was killed....akbar sent bairam Khan to pilgrimage and in the half way near khaibar pass or same kind of place he killed bairam Khan.....
Vairam Khan was killed by Rana pratap in the battle of dewair or halidghati
It’s so similar to what the Ottomans did!
It’s Mughal history that should be eradicated from our history books. They keep praising and idolising these barbarians. They are in fact shameful part of our history.
people judging medieval era kings by today's morality. please try to understand those kings were illiterate and did every possible thing to make sure that they remain as a king. that's it.
Most of them were literate.... They know how to write and read..... Very versed in language mathematics even some in science.
Education do exist before britishers
Actually, if you see this thing from Jahangir's point of view, this thing will seem different and even emotional. When Jahangir writes about Khusrau Mirza's escape, he says that Khusrau Mirza was distracted and preoccupied and didn't have belief in his father's affection. He also says that he should have shown the prince more affection so that not even a hair extent of doubt remained in his mind. Also, a few days after Khusrau Mirza was captured, Jahangir went to visit the Shah ara garden in Kabul along with his court and family. He ordered the chains to be taken off Khusrau's feet so that he could walk in that garden. Jahangir writes that his fatherly affection didn't allow him to exclude his son from walking in that garden. In 1619, Jahangir was probably in Vrindavan or Mathura if I am not wrong. During this time he writes that the dust from the brows of his son was washed with the pure water of forgiveness.
Can you please tell me from where did you collected this information i would like to read please
Babur had a lover boy - Baburi- who died is a battle- Babur was shattered and ordered demolition of Ram Mandir in Ayodhya and a masjid was built on top of it - hence Baburi masjid
Hindus are most peaceful and progressive.webare continuously reforming ourselves.most of times we never put violence against seniors citizens,kids and females..we fight in battles with ethics
others we see so much cruelty since centuries and all sort of violence and lack of humanity.
we Hindus have to be very strong and United.
U are supposed to be a doctor a doctor doesn't differentiate.......
Deluded, hindu are not saints historically, the dark age under moughal was karmic, need to learn from it.
If Hindus are so just then why are so many Putin supporters? Putin is like one of those Mughals rulers. Every Mughal ruler of India was a terrorist as far as I am concerned.
We read the glory of mughal empire only in the name of Akbar not in the name of other mughal kings because all others are only follow cruelty to rule.
this anchor every time when i look at him when he listen to the guest, everytime he look confused, doubt and must be thinking his guest don't what they are speaking non-sense totally blank...
Yaah I have also read history
Ashoka killed all his brother for succession of throne Rana kumbha is murdered by his own son
The pattern is repenting in Pakistan without the sadistic murders.
Maharana Pratap = Father of Akbar 🤴❤️🙏
You know Hindu rajputs fought for mughals all the way when Akbar married Rajput girls.This is history
Aren't these just mercenaries who destroyed Indian temples?
Akbar the great- How he changed from a ghazi to Kafir.
Ghazi period of Akbar - 1556 to 1578
Kafir period of Akbar- 1578 to 1605
Whatever others say I still believe Akbar was a good moderate ruler. Initially he was an Islamic Ghazi who worked to spread Islam through sword. He massacred the entire Chitoor garrison and unarmed people including women and children after its capture. But later he commissioned statues in Agra fort to honour the bravery and sacrifice of Mewar commanders Jaimal Rathore and Patta Sisodia. He used to pay tribute to them whenever he visited Agra fort. He was a kafir because he worshipped river Ganga and Sun God ( Suryanamaskaram and Yoga was a must for him in his later life). He became a vegetarian and banned Cow slaughter and Sati. He took actions to revive ancient hindu festivals of Kumbhamela. He was patron of many ancient temples including Kashi Vishwanath and Mathura temple. He was the only Indian ruler to issue coins of Lord Rama and Sita devi ( Ram-Siyal coins). Many maulavis of that period considered Akbar as a crypto hindu and Kafir. Diwali and Holi were periodically celebrated by Akbar throughout his empire. To please islamic scholars, Akbar gave a Persian Muslim name to it i.e Jashn-e-Chiraghan. The influence of Abul Fazl and Birbal made him a kafir and liberal thinker.
I agree that their way living is violent but this was the way of the world that time. It's survival of the fittest. I don't think it's just to judge yesterday's actions with today's lenses.
But they we should also not glorify such actions right ....... Seeing women as worse than second class citizens was the norm back then would you still justify it.... Who says that it was normal back then or not,who judges it....
That was the way of life in entire world except India...Killing brothers for throne...putting parents into prison...looting villages, raping women these things were common in entire world...Indian kings never lived liked that...there may be few exception...but majority of indian kings had very high moral standards.
Oh didi
Not just jealously but out of shame,Khoosro was perhaps biological son of akbar
36 people Shah Jahan killed or Aurangzeb?
Shah jahan killed all the 36 people who could claim the throne in which his brothers his cousins and all those people came who could claim the throne
The 5th sikh guru was killed by jahangir because he was the one who gave blessing to khursov during his Lahore rebellin
Taqht or Taboot
And i am from Allahabad just like you, so just listen to me for sake of being an Allahabadi , the way you addressed Mr. J. Sai Deepak, calling him dude and bro and what not , exactly why , that guy is doing so much for Hindu temples and artifacts being a lawyer fighting such things constitutionally, at least you could have shown him some respect
Sambhaji maharaj was tortured by Aurangzeb too !
Dontv use the word secular please
cruelty k karan raaj kr rhe the bs .....
Amazing
How much hatred is their in India for the Mughal Dynasty complete twist of the story Emperor Jahangir was famous for justice Adl e Jahangir
My history teacher 👩🏫😪
He is not kusro...his name is dara shikoh...this lady dosnt know anything
Akbar also had one brother named Mirja Hakim