2024 Mazda CX-5 updated moderate overlap IIHS crash test
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 05. 2024
- 2024 Mazda CX-5 40 mph updated moderate overlap front IIHS crash test
Overall evaluation: Good
Full rating at go.iihs.org/2024CX-5
Subscribe: go.iihs.org/subscribe
View Our Website: www.iihs.org/
Follow us:
Twitter: / iihs_autosafety
Facebook: / iihs.org
Instagram: go.iihs.org/instagram
LinkedIn: go.iihs.org/linkedin - Auta a dopravní prostředky
When the initial crash results came out a few months ago, I remember multiple of the comments being about how the test was unfair, how submarining was impossible to avoid. I recall how strange I found those comments to be, since all of the "impossible" things IIHS was looking at had seemingly already been addressed successfully for the *front* seat passengers. The fact that manufacturers were able to apply those same or equivalent solutions to *rear* seat passengers in a matter of months without having to fundamentally overhaul or redesign a vehicle that was originally designed about 7 or 8 years ago now reflects how important independent crash testing is, how modest improvements can save lives, and how nonsensical so many of those knee-jerk reactions were to attack the updated test.
Owners of the same car in tests tend to get defensive about their purchase decision.
Republicans.
Cx5 is underrated vehicle for sure
Smell 👃🏻 you bum bum lol
Guessing they changed the car for the 2024 model year so it performs better in this test?
The CX5 did really well in the new side test, but then got a poor in the updated moderate overlap, but still glad to see Mazda making changes quickly to keep up with newer tests.
Some manufacturers would probably wait till a whole redesign.
"The Mazda CX-5 was redesigned for the 2017 model year. Beginning with 2023 models, rear seatbelt load limiters and pre-tensioners were added to improve rear occupant protection in moderate overlap frontal crashes."
This minecraft video was amazing! Planes make more minecraft forge videos soon please!
Test came out a few months ago, CX-5 didn't fair well in this specific update, Mazda didn't like it, Mazda did improvements on the last year of the current generation... Thanks Mazda, glad to have one of these myself.
Brilliant effort from Mazda to fit rear seatbelt pretensioners. It shows the company is keen on improving its product.
Crashing cars all day....total dream job. Well done.
Don’t be a dummy😂
Good!
It looks much better than a 57 Chevy crash test so it's a winner in my book hahaha 😉😉👍😁😱😱
No 2024 black cx5 in Taiwan 😢😢😢
I think the Ford Bronco will also get a Good rating, with neck tension ≈30-40% lower than the Explorer.
スバルがMでそれよりプラットフォームの設計が古いマツダがGになるとはもうちょっとわかるように説明してもらいたいです。
スバルのテストで構造用接着剤は重くなっても安全性には寄与していないというのは見ていて理解できました。
日本車も要請つの仕方を繊維変える必要がはっきりありますよね。
点の溶接ではこの先はきっと無理なのでしょうね。
スバルもマツダも次のプラっとほおーむの登場を期待するしかないでしょうね。
でもバッテリーで重くしたら評価は下がる一方でしょうか？
gostei
Noice.
If it’s so important shouldn’t they just post it here and not redirect me?
I think if the brakes where applyed that the test would have more sound. reliable data on passengers and how the crash is on the body of the car considerably cause when in the de acceleration the picht of the car would change the crash points of sed vehicle and placement of passengers before the crash
I so cool the crash mazda suv
👀👂
Toyota owns Mazda. I hope Toyota can improve safety features like Mazda cars.
Toyota doesn't own Mazda, they have a joint venture to share technology, Toyota bought around 5% of Mazda and Mazda bought roughly 1% of Toyota, it was kind of am agreement.