0:49 shortcut. Proud Patreon Sponsor of Dr.Sadler's Channel. Jump in. 11:40 "Self". But surely its existence is an ontological determination of the mind? These are notes. Ignore. Do we miss the term "consciousness" in all of Nietzsche's ramblings? However the Self - Ego affectivity is an advantageous position in Nietzsche. Self to Ego, command to feel pain, feel joy. Self, creation of esteem, valuation and will. Body, lust and sorrow. Hierarchy of import; Disesteem for the body. The damaged self? It's imposition as desire . (Freud's death drive, perhaps?) Liberation when not contemning or despising self. "Intelligence" as commanded by the body. Hmm. Liberation to develop and cognise ones self. Self Compartmentalises, Sense and Spirit. Self lives in, and is your body in its finitude. Self finds its Reason in your body.
I have to say that, despite Nietzsche is one of the most difficut filosofers I could think of, these videos are incredible clear and facilitated my live in a big amount. Thanks of them! I'll watch all the Zaratustra's list.
Dr Sadler while I appreciate your drawing attention to this passage I'm not sure that you've truly realised it's profundity. I know it sounds pompous, but this section of TSZ is one of the most important and true things ever written. It sets up a metaphysics only glimpsed by the artist - one that is entirely missed by your analysis in my view.
You said a decaying self will destroy itself. I think that's my case and it's already happening, I'm realizing (without emotions because I don't have them anymore) that things are getting removed from my entrails and I can see my self in the image of my face attacking my body especially my entrails maybe it's some raw power moving aimlessly and just want to exercise it self and that's the way it's doing it. Can such self get fixed and then somehow maybe magically recover what's lost or am I just a lost cause. Now it seems like my spirit is what I have left but it's lifeless it can be vibrant and moves alot but it doesn't have life.
I have a question that maybe is not related to the main objetive of this video, but it refers to Nietzsche and I think is an interesting one. When Nietzsche criticises the Cristianism, is his critic refering to the cristianism itself, or specifically to the way the cristian church has developed? I mean, the main points of the cristianism when it was born were not that bad for Nietzsche's ideas; although he criticises everything different from self-will and individuality. I don't know, but the question is there: does he criticises the church itself or the creation of that faith, or both? Thanks for reading
Thank you so much for the video, it cleared lots of issues for me and the meaning of body and soul in his book. but i was wondering what does heart means. It is often in conjunction with the spirit. i am reading Edinburgh's philosophical guide for "Thus spoke Zarathustra" they were trying to relate "the spirit" to "will to power".
@@GregoryBSadler Thanks sir, sir i am completely new to philosophy, i dont even know where to start, i am an engineering student, i love science as my career but philosophy is my passion too, how do i suggest i go about it??
Jung must have based his psychological model, at least partially, on Nietzsche’s ego/self distinction - he saw the self as the pseudo-harmonic totality of being, while the ego was simply a constituent element of the self, but by no means the ordering principle or force of authority within the self.
You are one productive man!
0:49 shortcut. Proud Patreon Sponsor of Dr.Sadler's Channel.
Jump in. 11:40
"Self". But surely its existence is an ontological determination of the mind?
These are notes. Ignore.
Do we miss the term "consciousness" in all of Nietzsche's ramblings?
However the Self - Ego affectivity is an advantageous position in Nietzsche.
Self to Ego, command to feel pain, feel joy.
Self, creation of esteem, valuation and will.
Body, lust and sorrow.
Hierarchy of import; Disesteem for the body.
The damaged self?
It's imposition as desire . (Freud's death drive, perhaps?)
Liberation when not contemning or despising self.
"Intelligence" as commanded by the body.
Hmm. Liberation to develop and cognise ones self.
Self Compartmentalises, Sense and Spirit.
Self lives in, and is your body in its finitude.
Self finds its Reason in your body.
I have to say that, despite Nietzsche is one of the most difficut filosofers I could think of, these videos are incredible clear and facilitated my live in a big amount. Thanks of them! I'll watch all the Zaratustra's list.
Glad they're helpful for you!
WE LLOOOVVEE UUU DR SADLER
Thanks!
Dr Sadler while I appreciate your drawing attention to this passage I'm not sure that you've truly realised it's profundity. I know it sounds pompous, but this section of TSZ is one of the most important and true things ever written. It sets up a metaphysics only glimpsed by the artist - one that is entirely missed by your analysis in my view.
Yes, you certainly do sound pompous.
@@GregoryBSadler pahaha - shame that you think so. I could have been your Wagner!
Ludwig Wittgenduck Good luck with your studies. Not devoting any more of my time to you
@@GregoryBSadler How pompous
Thank you Gregory for this!
You're welcome!
You said a decaying self will destroy itself. I think that's my case and it's already happening, I'm realizing (without emotions because I don't have them anymore) that things are getting removed from my entrails and I can see my self in the image of my face attacking my body especially my entrails maybe it's some raw power moving aimlessly and just want to exercise it self and that's the way it's doing it. Can such self get fixed and then somehow maybe magically recover what's lost or am I just a lost cause. Now it seems like my spirit is what I have left but it's lifeless it can be vibrant and moves alot but it doesn't have life.
Just looked at the transcript, and I didn't say what you seem to think you heard.
Love this. Great work.
Thanks!
Thank you.
thank you soo much sir
You’re welcome!
I have a question that maybe is not related to the main objetive of this video, but it refers to Nietzsche and I think is an interesting one. When Nietzsche criticises the Cristianism, is his critic refering to the cristianism itself, or specifically to the way the cristian church has developed? I mean, the main points of the cristianism when it was born were not that bad for Nietzsche's ideas; although he criticises everything different from self-will and individuality.
I don't know, but the question is there: does he criticises the church itself or the creation of that faith, or both?
Thanks for reading
He's criticizing both
@@GregoryBSadler that was precise, thanks
Thank you so much for the video, it cleared lots of issues for me and the meaning of body and soul in his book. but i was wondering what does heart means. It is often in conjunction with the spirit. i am reading Edinburgh's philosophical guide for "Thus spoke Zarathustra" they were trying to relate "the spirit" to "will to power".
Avoid relating/identifying, and you'll do better
Thanks a lot for this video sir, i am totally new to philosophy and such video help young learners like me a looooooot!
You're very welcome!
@@GregoryBSadler Thanks sir, sir i am completely new to philosophy, i dont even know where to start, i am an engineering student, i love science as my career but philosophy is my passion too, how do i suggest i go about it??
@@abhaychowdhry7060 czcams.com/play/PL4gvlOxpKKIgFVZpisYc8GTl7rxuyRtwm.html
@@GregoryBSadler Thanks a lot for you reply sir, ill check it out :D
Jung must have based his psychological model, at least partially, on Nietzsche’s ego/self distinction - he saw the self as the pseudo-harmonic totality of being, while the ego was simply a constituent element of the self, but by no means the ordering principle or force of authority within the self.
That's there in Freud as well. But then again, Freud also read Nietzsche
@@GregoryBSadler Although Frued denied reading any of Nietzche's work, but it becomes clear to me day by day that he borrowed Neitzche's ideas.
@@maheral-rawashdeh5632 Yes, and more clear to Lou Andreas-Salomé