Aristotle, Metaphysics, bk. 1 | Criticisms of Plato's Forms | Philosophy Core Concepts
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 07. 2024
- Check out the Aristotle on the Moral Virtues class (starting April 13) - reasonio.teachable.com/p/aris...
Request personal videos on Cameo - www.cameo.com/gregorybsadler
Get Aristotle's Metaphysics - amzn.to/2M9efQW
Support my work here - / sadler
Philosophy tutorials - reasonio.wordpress.com/tutori...
Take classes with me - reasonio.teachable.com/
This is a video in my new Core Concepts series -- designed to provide students and lifelong learners a brief discussion focused on one main concept from a classic philosophical text and thinker.
This Core Concept video focuses on Aristotle's work, the Metaphysics and examines his criticisms articulated in book 1 of Plato's doctrine of the forms. Aristotle argues on a number of grounds that the forms or ideas do not provide a useful metaphysical account, particularly for things that change or have motion.
If you'd like to support my work producing videos like this, become a Patreon supporter! Here's the link to find out more - including the rewards I offer backers: / sadler
You can also make a direct contribution to help fund my ongoing educational projects, by clicking here: www.paypal.me/ReasonIO
If you're interested in philosophy tutorial sessions with me - especially on Aristotle's thought and works - click here: reasonio.wordpress.com/tutori...
You can find the copy of the text I am using for this sequence on Aristotle's Metaphysics here - amzn.to/2M9efQW
My videos are used by students, lifelong learners, other professors, and professionals to learn more about topics, texts, and thinkers in philosophy, religious studies, literature, social-political theory, critical thinking, and communications. These include college and university classes, British A-levels preparation, and Indian civil service (IAS) examination preparation
#philosophy #Aristotle #metaphysics
(Amazon links are associate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases)
Its been many many years since I studied Plato's forms. In gathering Aristotle's arguments against them into this video Dr. Sadler not only sheds some clarity on Aristotle's logical mind as they relate to Forms and substance but on Plato's concepts themselves, two birds with one stone so to speak. Understanding that Aristotle thinks the essence of something is at least in part in the thing itself, while Plato thinks the essence of the thing is "from a greater plane of understanding", really sets the two philosophers apart in a clear metaphysical way.
Yes, they definitely have two different schemes
I have my antique philosophy exam tomorrow morning, so this timing couldn’t be any better! Thanks for the clear & structured explanation!
Thank You. Mr. Sadler.
You're welcome
Brilliant lecture prof!
Thanks!
Thank you so much. Great video
You’re very welcome
interesting critique
Indeed
Aristotle probably had his bad days where he got overwhelmed from being taught by Plato and sounded just like 4:59
First of all, thanks for this Video!
So there's a passage in this part of the metaphysics (at about [990b20]) where I can't seem to follow his line of reasoning, where he states that there can only be ideas of substances/ ideas can only be substances, since the things don't participate in them incidentally - but then he goes on to state that, through participating in the Double-itself something participates also in the eternal, but only incidentally.
-> so that's my first hangup; since he goes on to talk about non-eternal things that are double, my guess was that the bit about "participates also in the eternal, but incidentally" was supposed to be a deductio ad absurdum, which he then goes on to show through the existence of non eternal things that are double, thus proving his first statement, namely that they can't participate incidentally
Also, I understand the problem about a thing having to participate in many things which follows from this part, "double" and "eternal" in this case.
Maybe I am reading him too close haha, but I spent an entire Monday morning on this exact paragraph already and didn't get my head around it.
Cheers, I hope you will continue this series since I'm tackling his major works right now, actually had quite a lot of fun with the physics and am now reading the metaphysics!
What did happen here, a few days ago, there where much more video's on antique philosophy?
Here where?
How can i find the imperialist objections of Plato's Theory of Form
czcams.com/video/OV_T8Emyf6I/video.html
I know you are very busy and probably don't have time to take requests. Are you ever planning to get back to more of the metaphysics lectures? I am reading his metaphysics, and I am having a hard time understanding a lot of what he is stating.
No plans in the near future. Right now I'm concentrating on videos for the classes I'm teaching. Later down the line, most likely
how and why did artistotle rejected plato's rationalism?
Here you go - czcams.com/video/OV_T8Emyf6I/video.html
what are the criticism
In the video, buddy. . . or in the text. . .
Only to hone your own thinking folks. Plato otherwise is like windows 2000.
No idea what you're trying to say
@@GregoryBSadlermaybe to hint that plato us still far ahead of our time? windows is on like windows 11 rn, so i guess hes saying that this video is only to educate and doesnt discredit plato’s philosophy?
@@shinu._.9713 You should just let him explain himself
@@GregoryBSadler youre right, but amazing video. It was really informative