Kyle Rittenhouse - Judge Schroeder Yells at Prosecutor Thomas Binger Over Previous Ruling
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 11. 2021
- Live Coverage: WI v. Kyle Rittenhouse - Kenosha Shooting
Happening in Court:
Charges:
1. First Degree Reckless Homicide, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Joseph Rosenbaum)
2. First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Richard
McGinnis, reporter for Daily Caller, not injured but near Rosenbaum when Rittenhoue
fired)
3. First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety, Use of a Deadly Weapon (unknown male)
4. First Degree Intentional Homicide, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Anthony Huber)
5. Attempt First Degree Intentional Homicide, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Gaige
Grosskreutz)
6. Possession of a Dangerous Weapon by a Person under the Age of 18
7. DISMISSED AT THE END OF STATE”S CASE. Prosecution failed to put evidence in front of the jury that there was a lawful curfew in place (appears to be an oversight by prosecution) Defense moved to dismiss, judge agreed. Fail to Comply with Order of Local Government - Emergency Management Activity (citation, carries no penalty) - everyone present was breaking the 7pm curfew issued by the sheriff.
Possible Sentence: Max: Life in Prison Without Parole (WI does not have the DP)
JURY CHOSEN IN ONE DAY. 20 jurors have been selected in WI v. Kyle Rittenhouse. 9 men and 11 women. (8 are alternates)
Rittenhouse shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum, 26, and Anthony Huber, 26, and injured Gaige Grosskreutz, 27. Prosecutors say that Rittenhouse, then 17 and from Illinois, was a vigilante looking for a fight. He, like other right-wingers, went to Kenosha, Wisconsin ostensibly to protect property. This happened as protests over police shooting local man Jacob Blake turned violent. Rittenhouse’s attorneys assert he was acting in self-defense. This case became a cause célèbre among conservatives.
Prosecutors have struggled in court, failing to introduce evidence of prior aggressive behavior. This included evidence showing him attacking a woman who was in an altercation with his sister. The other is that he was closely linked to the violent, far-right Proud Boys organization.
Kenosha County Judge Bruce Schroeder said an appellate court would reverse him if he allowed these in trial. The evidence was too prejudicial, he said. He left it up in the air whether he would allow footage showing someone identified as Rittenhouse discussing a Black man exiting a CVS pharmacy. Rittenhouse believed the man was shoplifting.
#KyleRittenhouse #KenoshaShooting
Watch Law&Crime Network NOW on CZcamsTV!
tv.czcams.com/users/welcome?...
OTHER WAYS TO WATCH LAW&CRIME NETWORK IN YOUR AREA:
lawandcrime.com/where-to-watch/
Who To Follow On Twitter:
@LawCrimeNetwork
@LawCrimeVerdict
@Cathy Russon
@AddiTrialsStuff - Zábava
That Prosecutor is the greatest gift a defendant could ever have.
His sidekick gets flagged at buffets
A penis?
@@MrStukaju87d lmfao nice 😂
Unless they’re now trying to get a mistrial without prejudice..
Prosecutor is paid by the state. Defense raised MILLIONS of dollars. Alec Baldwin and Travis Scott both killed people this month. No charges even.
Man, this prosecutor was the best defense atorney for Kyle
That's great sarcasm! LOL I agree!
@@guitarttimman i mean its facts though
Yeah at first I thought he was defending him, by making clear that Kyle really knew when to use his gun, while also subliminally painting a bad image of the protestors in the Jury's mind.
@Sid- best attorney for Kyle. Judge Schroeder. Gave him a shutout .
Seriously. He did a terrible job.
I didn't go to law school and I know you can't insinuate that a defendant remaining silent is a sign of guilt.
He knew it too and he didn’t care…he was trying to get away with what ever he could
You can't talk over people in a courtroom lmao, you probably should take law schoo
I think he knew he destroyed his case and wanted a mistrial
Binger knew that too. He was making a speech for the cameras. He was looking to get elected some day.
He was trying to get a mistrial to try him again because he saw his star witness got demolished on the stand. That case blew up for binger so he was literally trying to get a mistrial to try him again. If it was up to binger Kyle would be in prison for life.
When a judge says “DONT GET BRAZEN WITH ME!” You lost your case bro.
false you could easily still win
@@evanfinch4987 nah
Well, its up to the jury and the jury doesn't see when the judge yells at him so they could still win the case. It was fatal to their case in this instance because they didn't have ant evidence
@@jill61421 Its up to the Jury to convince the JUDGE he is innocent. They do not themselves make someone guilty/not guilty.
This judge has issues
"You'd agree that agreeing would be an agreement, correct?"
I think so
Correct
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Uhh yes?
Bingo
I genuinely thought that a lawyer annoying a judge to this level only happened in films.
that's what this is. are you not entertained?
Your needing to get out the house more often .
Annoying judges don't appear in films like this one. Schroeder ran a circus.
@@ohio hahaha youtdem
David vs Goliath!~!!!!!!
The fact that this young man was even brought to trial was a disgrace.
Agreed
@@human-xh6en he was defending himself.
@@human-xh6en self defense is a thing, you know.
He could have killed 15 people, doesn´t matter. If he was defending his life, it´s fair game.
@@human-xh6en You obviously don´t know how self defense works. Stop watching TYT, you will lose brain cells.
Kyle RittenRacist should be in a prison cell with Bubba as his cellmate, Hambone as his left neighbor, and Skillet on his right, with each taking turns snuggling in his bunk as butt brothers on a weekly basis.
You know it’s bad when the court reporter tries to tell you to shut up
hahahahah this
Not a reporter. a Stenographer.
@@vordt4139 acshually
@@vordt4139 well he called her « Madame court reporter »
@@MasonHatfieldLogorrheathat’s because this dude is a clown of a prosecutor. he’s be a worse defense attorney.
“You’d agree that every 60 seconds a minute passes in Africa, correct?”
Yes, yes I would sir prosecutor
N O
actually, it's 5 children
This is the comment
Yes, but for the 750,000 child slaves in Africa, one minute seems like an eternity.
Man he doesn't even need defense, the prosecutor is doing it for them
I was thinking the same thing
Defense seems to learn what the word objection means and use it. When the prosecutor was lying shaking his head no isn't going to cut it. Object, point out the prosecutor is lying. Impeach the prosecutor's credibility as much as possible.
I couldn't have said it any better, the prosecution are making fools of themselves.
@@robertthomas5906 Perhaps, but the defense could have been letting the prosecution dig the hole a bit deeper...
@@bicameralmind6785 , Or the prosecutor knows Kyle isn't guilty of murder, but they had to charge him because of politics and the woke mob.
He's literally doing the defense's job for them.
****edit**** I've been blocked from commenting by @Diane because she a Google GESTAPO, paid shill who hates the truth. Kyle was being chased by three men wielding weapons and threatening to kill him. Clear cut case of self defense.
Censorship is only needed when one is trying to hide truth. We call this cheating. If you thought your imposed time out would shut me up, You've got another think coming. I'll be back to destroy you in about 6 hours, dear💩ing 🧱s of fear.
******End of edit*****
When I’m having a truly terrible day, just before I cry I watch this video and I realize that no matter what I do in my life, I’ll never be as big of a failure as this attorney.🎉
ikr I feel at even my lowest point I could be like this guy and bs my way into a law degree lmao
To even bring this to trial.....people have been disbarred for less....
💯🙌🏽
Little finger Binger
He wasn't that bad, he just had no case and so had to fabricate one.
I'm beginning to be a big supporter of courtroom video proceedings being made public. The educational value for law students, and active atorneys seems to be well worth it, and I would think that it could help in cases of mistrial and appeal.
I think that Kyle RittenRacist belongs in a prison cell with Bubba as his lifelong butt brother.
True... but you have to think about the privacy of those involved, especially the innocent. I would never want a court case about me to be studied in a classroom.
@@3NewDay true but at the same time it exonerates the innocent. There are plenty of cases where someone isn’t charged but initial biases are only cemented by their assumptions without seeing why some was or was not charged.
Should be a step further, ALL politics and law should be on 24/7 livestream for taxpayers to see all day long as long as they are in elected or appointed office.
@@3NewDay Court records are public information regardless, unless it's a closed-doors trial. There's no further harm to the privacy of those involved than what is already accepted today.
I was thinking his lawyer was doing a pretty decent job, then I realized that it was the prosecutor
If you watch louder with crowder he did a live streaming of the opening statement and he joked the defense should say I agree with what most of the defense says
That was a good one
His lawyer has been asleep the entire trial, endless missed opportunities to object, and they completely screwed up gun ownerships laws that have been added as a lesser charge.
@@lorddiethorn Crowder’s a snowflake
To be fair his lawyer are doing so good they recruited the judge as one of them. This one lawyer has to walk through the weeds just to ask a question and he has to use verbiage that isn’t insensitive to the kid
Total prosecutorial misconduct. Every first year law student knows you can’t imply silence is an admission of guilt. And I went to law school 50 years ago.
Kyle isn't silent though, you doorknob.
@@onthetongue silence on a topic in court (which is what ken was talking about) is not an admission of guilt. the context is important when reading comments.
I haven't even taken a criminal law course and even I know that.
Prosecutors have been operating under the understanding that the people don’t have rights and it’s rare to get a judge to slap them down. But this judge has yet to slap them down by throwing the whole case out the window. Prosecutors know how to game the system and take the warning from the judge but still inserted the ideas he pull off during the cross in this case. This kid shoulda sat on the side lines and let it play out without having to take the standing. Sadly, when you are young, you wanna be truthful and for coming, it’s youths greatests down fall. Wanting to be honest and truthful. He seems like a good kid but easily misguided and maybe a bit slow at the time. He life will never be the same.
@@onthetongue The silence they are talking about is back when he turned himself in, not right now.
“Objection: your honor, he’s just yapping”
The best judge I’ve ever seen. “I don’t need you to tell me what the defense theory is in this case” hahaha classic.
youve watched very few trials i see
@@evanfinch4987may I sincerely ask why you say that? I am new to law
I have NEVER seen an attorney talk to a judge like this. Wow.
It's like a comedy sketch of 'the scummy prosecutor', because no actual drama would write one that way.
He’s annoyingly cocky.
I think he feels a little braver than normal since the entire country is watching and he knows the Judge won't just call for a mistrial being the case is as high-profile as it is, so he's willing to take some extra chances.
@@plantedbytherivers96 he's desperate to win and lock him up
@Jean Lencar wait what does hair gel have to do with this
In law school we are taught NOT to argue with the judge like this. It is completely disrespectful. Must have court etiquette at all times👨⚖️
Most people suck and fail at their jobs and professions...
He’s a leftist lawyer, what do you expect??
@@GarrettPederson253 bruuuhhh
You'll learn the exceptions after you graduate. ;)
@@myblacklab7 I graduated a decade ago bud
This prosecutor should be disbarred for misconduct. His behavior is outrageous. He was definitely trying to provoke a mistrial! To question the defendants right to remain silent?!
The fact Binger and Lunch Box are still allowed to prosecute people is disturbing
You’d agree that a comically large spoon still constitutes a spoon full, correct?
Yes
I have no argument case closed
Correct
I uphold my 5th amendment right not to answer that question
“Rarely do we find men who willingly engage in hard, solid thinking. There is an almost universal quest for easy answers and half-baked solutions. Nothing pains some people more than having to think.”
Dude was so confident in himself like he was bouta make history. His career as a lawyer is the only thing that's history.
😂 Yup!
@knuggynug- Never underestimate your opponent.
he is a lawyer. they have no shame
Yeah and now the jury can consider lesser charges in deliberation cuz this guy knew he blew it. That kind of sucks because he did everything by the book and the state has proven nothing but they’re incompetent
@@JandJOutdoorsmen1 It's up to the defense to accept lesser charges. If they are so confident then why put Rittenhouse on the stand.
I love how the Judge goes into full law school prof mode. It is such a power move.
He's still going through all of the situations where you are not allowed to use deadly force still to this day. I believe the latest ones include "You'd agree with me, that you can't use deadly force to stop someone from putting ketchup on hotdogs, correct?" and "You'd agree with me, that you can't use deadly force to stop someone from singing baby shark, correct?"
Hotdogs no baby shark oh definitely
@@newt4949 Meh, I'd say Hamburgers and non-woke cartoons like chinchilla lol
Lmaooooo
I actually paused at the baby shark ...I'm a terrible person lol
I disagree on the baby shark part...
“You’d agree you can’t use deadly force if McDonald’s runs out of ketchup correct?”
Correct
What if the icecream machine is down
I mean i would
why wouldn't you you have to eat to survive
Why make light of this. Two men are dead.
You’d agree with me that you can’t use deadly force to stop someone from eating a grilled cheese sandwich is that correct?
👏😂
Correct
Depends on how good it is
Incorrect
Best comment 👌
The Judge Quickly, Sharply, and Aggressively puts down any defiance from the lawyer, then returns to his calm, collected, and reasonable demeanor.
This trial was one of the great triumphs of good over evil. Whole thing was so perfectly cinematic. Gives me great hope
Bro I swear I've seen your pfp somewhere... Aren't you in a lot of comment sections? lol
@Only2GenderKennder commonly used pic I've seen other users with, but I do comment on a lot of political stuff, music, and religious stuff? Maybe our interests overlap lol
@@MrNU998 You sound pretty og my guy. I literally listen and watch ALL of that stuff lol god bless
@Only2GenderKennder Thank you man God bless you too I'm sure our paths will meet again in the comments 🫡
@@MrNU998wholesome
How does a prosecutor like this even end up dealing with a case of this caliber?
Best lawyers work in firms ,they pay more
I think he was hired to make it certain that Kyle went free. Like there is NO way that buddy here was actually trying.
@@ynotsammy He is the Assistant DA, elected, The DA probably saw the case/evidence and passed the buck not to mess with his record.
Cuz no one wants the case. It's an attempt at virtue signaling
Of what caliber?? Open and shut self defense? The case is a joke and is just being used as entertainment and a tool for more division amungst the people of this country lmfao. People need to stop drinking the coolaid.
“You’d agree that you can’t use deadly force when they have been trying to reach you about your cars extended warranty, correct?”
@forseth11 Correct.
I’d disagree
No we need deadlier force
Funniest comment 😂
@@aarongamboa9768 a strong arguement for recreational nukes.
I'm so glad this young boy is free to live his life.
Same
Agreed. He had his rights to self defense. He was being rushed by multiple people trying to take his weapon so he responded appropriately.
While two unarmed people died from an illegally obtained gun which the judge didn't rule on till the last minute so it couldn't be appealed and even apologized for.
@@nibcamp3958 they still threatened him so he bad every right to shoot them. If a crowd of people are running at you talking about killing you, you have the right to open fire.
@@nibcamp3958Communists aren’t people.
Never interrupt the enemy when he's making a mistake..... Perfect example
Enemy? Good thing you aren’t on the jury.
He is not an enemy ! He is EVIL
@@matthewright3736 Paul, that may be so, but we also don’t know all the facts. Let’s hope the jury makes an unbias judgement. Evil is a harsh word for someone who killed people in defense who provoked him for having a gun.
Just my unbias thoughts.
I too was angry with the Jacob shooting.
@@onelogue i dont think they were talking about kyle. Its the prosecutor binger
@@onelogue talkin about the prosecutor
This doesn’t even feel like a trial. This feels like mock trial where the attorney and judge have beef at school.
I did mock trials at my high school where folks got into slapping fights and screaming matches, and they were more professional than this.
My Cousin Vinny.
It looks like they must have a prior history of run-ins. They mix as well as oil and water.
@@libRteedude Literally fights where they were slapping each other? In what universe would that be _more_ professional than this?
@@libRteedude I highly doubt that anything even close to that happened, stick to the truth, maybe we'll believe it.
If I’m ever on trial I hope Mr. Binger is the one prosecuting me
legend has it binger is still in a empty court room asking himself "you would agree with me you cant use deadly force if"
"I'm trying to impeach the defendant on his beliefs"
That was finally a bit of honesty for this corrupt prosecutor.... absolutely insane
Absolutely right!
Dude was idiotic
What can you impeach a witness for?
A witnesses may be impeached with evidence that shows a defect in his or her perception, memory, or truthfulness, such as evidence of bias, mistake, character for untruthfulness, or prior inconsistent statements.
He admitted to wanting to use the gun to defend property before. That goes to state of mind and the jury needed to know that. You shouldn't be allowed to point guns at people. The judge is limiting the evidence to the benefit of Rittenhouse. . ..
@@stevenvox6549 you mean like when the prosecutor pointed the gun at the jury?
"You'd agree that you can't use deadly force to prevent someone from grabbing the last slice of pizza?"
Talking to the judge with his hand in his pocket says it all.
I am 90% confident that at 5:15 when the judge says "and it gives the...well I'll leave it at that", he was going to say "it gives the impression that you're deliberately acting in a manner that forces a mistrial", or something to that effect
It gives.... the defense the rightful ability to declare a mistrial.
Well, you could be right, you could be wrong…but at least you answered my question…what did he stop himself from saying?
@@stuntmusicgameshow311 that is 100% what he was going to say
This incompetent biased judge is the one who is going to cause a mistrial.
agreed
I cannot believe this prosecutor tried to use Kyle’s right to remain silent against him. This sneaky way of getting these questions in is unbelievable! I’m so happy the judge is so on the ball!!
Simply having a gun on you is NOT deadly force, it’s simply being armed.
He wanted a mistrial. He didn't want it to go to the jury. He knew it was self-defense
The Miranda Right of staying silent isn’t applicable when you’re under oath I believe.
Oh my gosh I should’ve watched the full video before replying, I thought you meant he could stay silent in the court
@@sskies4972 you believe wrong. You can most certainly plead the 5th under oath. That's not what happened here. A lawyer can't insinuate someone is guilty in front of a jury when someone didn't talk to the police. Noone should talk to police without an attorney
@@chrischurch4551 if prosecution deliberately causes a mistrial, double Jeopardy bars retrial
He was definitely trying to force a mistrial.
Crazy how often a defendant invokes their right to silence, and yet it still gets brought up in court. Imagine the cases where the judge isn’t wary or unbiased enough to point this out?
It’s hilarious that a judge has to tell the prosecutor multiple times what law’s and rules mean and what they imply.
it's depressing that there's prosecutors like this - textbook example of why people don't trust the system
The prosecutor is a leftist liberal. He thinks if he says it it must be true, because his mommy always let him have his own way!
@@billfrost5674 i think its common sense
More like depressing
Happens all the time
If ANYONE IS CONFUSED
I got you.
Propensity Evidence is when you show a person's character or actions in past events is the real reason they did the current crime they are in court for.
That basically means they are saying to the court "hey he's lying that he shot people in self defense. He really did it because he's itching to shoot someone, because if you look at what he did in this situation before, that's what he's been dying to do"
The judge is saying "hey man i don't think this makes sense and that situation isn't similar enough to this current case to say that ... so you can't bring that argument in court to a jury because it's invalid "
The guy brought it to court anyway without asking permission for it
@Teej "but there's a case to be made that he had absolutely no business playing army man" That's your opinion. The case was him killing in self defense had no relation to him defending property. That's why the Judge denied the use of it here. Unless you think you're smarter, more experienced, and knowledgeable than many Lawyers, the Judge and everyone else involved lol. It's not weird, it's actually not relevant at all. It's weird and makes sense to people like you who don't have a brain which is why he tried to bring the point up to the Jury even the Judge told him not to - hoping for people like you in the Jury to get on his side to think it is relevant when it is not relevant. "If he's agreeing that he's not allowed to use that gun to defend property, how did he plan to defend property?" Again he didn't kill someone to defend property, he killed someone because somebody was aggressive and physically chased him verbally shouting intent towards Kyle. You are the exact person the he was looking for lol.
"He made clear he wished he could've shot shoplifters in the past" Was the guy he shot a shoplifter? No.
@Teej After finishing the video the Judge literally explains why it's not valid evidence, if you still don't understand after this you're on our own in this world kid lmao
The prosecutors point is a dead end. He says Kyle didn't have a gun and wished he could shoot shoplifters. Well, Kyle DID have a gun this time, and DIDN'T shot anyone committing property crimes. He only shot people trying to aggressively assault him.
So this whole argument of his is a dead end. There's a difference between saying and doing. Kyle said it, but given the opportunity to DO it, he chose not too. Argument ended. 🤷♂️
@@jim5379 you should reread what he said
@@jim5379 he’s implying the prosecution should have made the case about him being there in the first place and not about whether it was murder or not. Him wanting to play army man isn’t an opinion, you don’t go travel to another town with a gun to “defend people’s property” he definitely was looking for action.
This is an experienced prosecutor is whats amazing to me. Why he thought he could continue to try and argue and bend the rules is beyond me....
His star witness admitted to being the aggressor and his case was shot from there. He Knew this and was trying to get the mistrial so he could try the case again without that witness. The Judge recognized this and refused to allow it to happen.
@@redneckhippiefreakthe great irony of that moment is he dropped the felony firearms possession and concealment charges against Gage to use him as a witness.
So he opted not to charge a felon for illegal possession just to have him destroy the prosecution in return.
What's scary is his bias to win here going beyond the scope of procedure - I hope he's being investigated because this smells like $$$ due to the high-profile nature of the case
The judge should have intervened earlier while the prosecution was making a legal address rather than a question.
You’d agree with me that you can’t use deadly force to stop someone from drinking water is that correct?
Correct. Then why did you point your gun at someone drinking water.
Gulp
Betty that’s not the question. Please listen again. Lol
@@fatghostboo8007 What do you mean?
y’all he had no right to b there n feel the need to try n stop ppl from doin so, it might of been wrong, but he obviously provoked them enough to feel the need to want to charge @ him, it clearly states by law that u cant use deadly force period while trying to stop a situation from occurring.. unless u the police
"You would agree that this is illegal, correct?"
_aims gun at jury_
Ritter-"Correct"
'Gun discharges'
You would agree that pointing you gun and discharging it like so *shoots in the air” ….this is illegal, is that correct?
@@andreipaulavets7234 It doesn't discharge by itself, you can see that this idiot had his finger on the trigger.
JAJAJAJAJA good one.
Good one lol...
This never gets old.
I do recall when he pointed the gun at everyone in the court room
Finger on trigger too iirc
This guy is insufferable. He asked the same question worded in different ways 54 times over 5 hours this afternoon in an attempt to get Kyle to contradict himself.
And Kyle did contradict himself, despite his attempts to avoid answering the simple yes/no questions
@@user-ro9md9wp3j no he didn't. Not one of the questions was about what actually happened.
Answer me this.. yes or no only.
Do you still beat your wife and smoke crack
"Is one plus one really two? How about four minus two? Sixteen divided by eight? Are you sure? well then what is twelve divided by three divided by two? How about the square root of four? Cube root of eight? I'm going to keep giving you equations until you trip up and give me the wrong answer different from two."
Have you never watched a trial before? This is a regular thing..:
Prosecutor: Objection your honor! I'm losing the case.
The prosecutor is amazing. He’s on thin ice, but instead to walking carefully, he jumps up and down.
Lmfao
He’s doing it on purpose to try to get a mis-trial because he bungled this so badly.
The left always double downs.
He is great…..for the defence. Just about every witness he called worked out in favour of the defence. Not too bright! 😂🤣😂
@@TommyRibs At this point, a mistrial is the better option. Prosecution is F*ng up the case so bad. Not to mention the Judge was bias as heck.
Imagine what happens when your lawyer you hire for a national case is an ambulance chaser.
The prosecutor seems to have a significant amount of swagger for a person skating on thin ice.
😂😂 he seems to care less than the judge
It's probably not an unusual place for him to find himself in.
He's trying and failing to compensate for his complete lack of a case.
The exaggerated swagger of a lawyer skating on thin ice.
He reminds me of a douchy bad guy in an Iron Man movie, like Hammer in Iron Man 2
Thomas Binger is the type of lawyer who gets innocent people in trouble because he's doing anything to win, and attempting every angle that exists to support his case - regardless of the facts. Horrendous example of the worst of law! ☠
He even pulled out an AR15 and pointed it toward the jury to prove a point
Greasy as they come
but prosecutor is not a lawyer, and is not a party in the case; he cannot win nor lose, couse he is independent, impartial and neutral
In other words: he is a lawyer.
@@PrSndreLrsn as an advocat? no; as a man of law? yes
but he is totally different that an advocat or defender
This is a rare case where the prosecutor is corrupt and the judge is not. I hope that this will be as landmark of a case as people say
This judge is absolutely honorable. I think we need more judges like him..fair and balanced.
Prosecutor: “I’d like to make a record without being interrupted”
Also prosecutor: *cuts off judge while judge explains why he’s wrong*
He better hope that judge retires soon lol
The prosecutor plays a typical leftist trick of double standards, but he chose a wrong place and a wrong person.
@@tomaswu8471 yes!
@@tomaswu8471 look at all the hate liberals are getting. They will get what’s coming to them in 2024
Don’t yell at a judge for interrupting you. Very bad move.
Prosecutor is trying to trigger a mistrial so he doesn’t get the verdict he knows is coming. Very dangerous tactic.
Yup, the lengths these parasites will go to promote their careers.
What do you expect from Justin Hammer.
Very dirty trick
Very likely. At this point the prosecutor may be hoping for a mistrial without prejudice so can fix all the mistakes they’ve made and take this to trial again.
That's why defense countered with a mistrial with prejudice.
The prosecutor was so desperate with this case and it shows. Who in their right mind tries to imply that silence is an admission of guilt in court? He was aiming for a mistrial it's painfully obvious.
The fact that they now teach this as “what not to do” in Law Enforcement academies is hilarious lmfaooo
Do they really? I'd love to see that.
@@jalamanta Yeah, during our investigations portion they talked about post arrest silence and never assuming “they have something to hide.” Which then they showed examples of both, Binger was one of them.
@rbrick3685 that's brilliant
"you'd agree that the sky is blue, correct?"
"you'd agree that I look like Justin Hammer from Iron Man 2, released in 2010, correct? "
LOL
DUDE. YES!!
Killed it, lmfao!
Lollll
😂
Honestly, no matter if you think hes guilty or innocent, we all gotta agree that the trial is a complete joke. This'll be used as a example for what NOT to do during a case.
GUILTY
@@trawmmwart8149 innocent until proven guilty. Plus you can see the trials on CZcams. This whole thing is a circus and you're one of the clowns who choose to participate
He is innocent tho
@@angelmelendez742 gonna repeat it to the other guy too?
@@TsdsxSansTSSunStone got an anime PFP and got Sans and sunstone on your account name. Comment invalidated or should I say don't care
Headline fix: “When a prosecutor is more of a criminal than the defendant”
Kyle will go down in history to have the prosecutor and defendent lawyers on his side
...and the judge.
@@paulwblair the judge isn't really on his side.
The judge is only furious with Binger because he is being very unprofessional and undertaking bad practises which could be almost illegal on itself (breaking the 5th amendment for example)
@@callummartin4697 I don't buy it. The judge is a right wing nut. The DA is probably throwing the case.
@@paulwblair I agree about the DA throwing the case. But how is the judge a right-wing nut?
@@paulwblair prove the judge is a "right wing nut" then.
And don't use the phone ring tone as a reason because its just a song, doesn't mean anything else but what his personal taste in ringtones is.
I crack up when the judge says “so I don’t know what you’re up to” 🤣🤣🤣😂
"Don't get brazen with me." My new favorite quote.
That's what a boomer would say
@@serenity7725 Then we'll put it in the "oldies but goodies" category.
@@kennethmiller2333 "oldies but GOLDIES" lol.
@@serenity7725 calm down gen z
amazing word choice, I think that word needs to make a comeback outside of the courtroom.
The prosecutor aggravated the judge. His arrogance was probably a contributing factor in his loss of the case.
I love this judge! What a country we would have, if we had more judges like him at all levels of the judiciary
WE already have tons of corrupt judges. This clown is not alone. Ignorant folks love the corruption.
"Defense do you have any closing arguments?" " Ahhhh no your honor , but can we have the prosecutor speak again ?" lmao
Lol so good
🤣Good one 🤣
I laughed so hard at this 😂
It's just like a comedic skit. The prosecution doing the work for the defenders 😂
Lmfao
I laughed at that, nice 1👍
Without commenting on guilt or innocence, I am encouraged that the Judge in this matter is protecting the concept of innocent until proven guilty. It should be the State's burden and it should be hard. That is the whole idea behind our justice system.
So how much is the judge being bribed
@@nosuchthing8 Why are you assuming that? The Judge is just doing his job and frankly the prosecution has shown only that Kyle did defend himself. He never shot someone to stop something from burning when he could have, he only went and stopped the burning. He only shot when he was in danger.
@@nosuchthing8 his lively hood according to the Constitution of this land
@@nosuchthing8 I don’t even think you came up with insult you intended since being bribed is not a crime. Accepting a bribe, however, would be criminal.
@@Bit01ByBit01 , didn't he say that he left home with the gun to protect property?
This prosecutor needs to be in prison.
Why send him to a place he would enjoy living with a bunch of guys?
Judge Schroeder is a rockstar and one of my heroes, may the honorable judge live healthy for many more years
You’d agree with me in the statements:
Whom ever smelt it dealt it
Whom ever denied it supplied it
Whom ever made up the rhyme did the crime.
Correct
So.... You're guilty on all counts, sir. OFF TO JAIL
Whoever*, not whomever!
@@Karl_Kampfwagen you beat me to it
goat comment lol🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣💯🦾
Whether he was guilty or not, you have to admit the prosecutor was in WAY over his head. He made sooo many mistakes during this trial
Yeah. I don't really know if what he did was illegal assault or self defense, it's so confusing. But this prosecutor SUCKED, and that's probably one of the reasons why Kyle got acquitted. This whole thing looks like a complete political rabbit hole, but I'm just gonna take the not guilty and roll with it and assume he's not guilty.
@@richardcarter8751 just watch all the videos of the incident. It’s blatant self defense. Rittenhouse even went out of his way to disengage. If he was truly out for blood there would have been more bodies in the dirt
@@talltale9760 that's what I'm thinking. I don't know all the facts, but if he really only shot when he felt he was truly in danger, then he deserves to walk free imo. I don't know why people are obsessed with this case tbh.
@@MrFusion because "gun bad" and "trumpism" according to the media.
@@richardcarter8751 jeez dude you can’t tell he was not guilty just through critical thinking? go watch the raw unedited video of him being attacked
The lawyer would put an innocent man in jail, just to win. Despicable.
Kyle as a minor was the kind of citizen we should all aspire to be and as a non American myself I thought he embodied the American spirit in a really profound way, he was providing a public service in the way of firefighting (and I believe he had a medical kit to provide first aid) and carried on him the same means of protection that the police had in the exact same situation. He was set upon by a mob for trying to help the community and defended himself with the only means he had available. Your bill of rights is a beautiful thing, the way your citizens have a more direct say in their governance is brilliant and it’s only the people trying to subvert those things that make your country look bad. You yanks should be bloody proud of your traditions because they empower the everyman in a way nowhere else on earth does
That's very kind :) I'm glad to live here for those reasons
Very succinctly put👌
We had a good start, being British.
you are not empowered against the state . good luck if the US army brings tanks into your street, your AR isnt saving you lol
@@Ps-we3pp tanks destroy infrastructure, setup in a power station, water distribution network or major transportation hub and see how quickly they use boots on the ground over armoured or air assets
One guy with an AR isn’t worth 10-50 million in infrastructure
I’m not even American and I know this, but I am ex military, they’d send us into an ambush over bombing a high voltage switching station any day of the week
Use your head
"You'd agree that everything tastes better with bacon, correct?"
Wrong, Beef stroganoff is not better with bacon. Trust me I tried it...
Ar15s are better with bacon.
@@LabelMeInfinity Blasfemy!
🤣 correct
@@LabelMeInfinity "Don't get brazen with me!" Lol
This lawyer is a good example of the corruption run rampart in our society. He was trying to add context to things already said and confirmed in attempts to draw conclusions and lead the jury.
How many innocents have been sentenced with these tactics?
@@lastrolo too many. Not all prosecutors behave this way. You can tell this guy is an arrogant know it all.
What were the main arguments as to why Kyle Rittenhouse should not have used deadly force on others who were attempting to use deadly or very harmful force on him? How this was not deemed pure self defense? What did prosecutors want as punishment?
This is exactly how Prosecution works, and it's all for the money.
Like it run ...rampart
This prosecutor was trying to question the defendant on the basis of what the prosecutor BELIEVES about the defendant's ideology and belief system -- even when he was silent. The bottom line was that he was using his questions on the defendant's silence as a means to influence the jury toward a negative opinion of the defendant over his right of silences. This is so unbelievably ridiculous for any individual with a license to practice law to do that I'm surprised that he wasn't thrown out of the courtroom and disbarred over this.
The judge went in DRY on this fool lol.
Well as a Democrat that might be his kink
The judge looks like he wants to beat the prosecutor with his gavel.
He probably does
I want that too
I’d pay to see that if I’m going to be honest.
So then he’s bias, thanks for that
@@joecool2029 cope
The Rittenhouse challenge
Take a drink every time Thomas Binger says "You'd agree with me"
Nah man I'd end up as stupid as the prosecutor.
@@alfonsoarroyo3283 made me laugh!
you will be in the hospital you'd agree with me
We would all end up drunk. You’d agree with me? 😂😂😂
I'd tought that was when you would drink a chaser followed by 3 shots.
This trial was a joke and a shame. It was obvious that Kyle was within his rights from the start. This kid almost had his life ruined for nothing
Probably one of the most epic smackdowns of one of the most inept prosecutors I've ever seen in the history of the court.
Kyle's just sitting there like he's watching his parents yelling at his siblings.
Wunder if he has learned anything positive from this experience?
@@fifermcgee5971 Yep, he did what should be done!!!
@@gjam5204 he should go free because of self defense.
Pretty sure you would stop your child from going to a riot with a gun. But because it's not your kid and he killed 2 protester's, it's all good.
@@nataliewalton5118 good thing klye brought a gun because that guy would have shot klye in the head. Klye beat him to the bunch.
klye did not shoot until that guy put is handgun to klyes head and that is klye shot him in the arm. Self defense period.
And people thought criminal defense attorneys were sleezy……..what a joke of a prosecutor
Facts!!!
Prosecutors' lies are ridiculous.
I am not an attorney but when he started questioning Kyle on his 5th amendment rights I was wondering if the prosecutor even went to law school
But he is good, you've got to give him that lol.
@@TheJack4000111 He's awful, what are you talking about? He attempted to violate constitutional rights, was accused by a witness of attempting to get him to alter his official statement, and nearly had the case thrown out on mistrial without prejudice.
One of the best derssing downs of an Attorney I've ever seen. Never gets old.
For a seventeen year old, he seems much smarter than that prosecutor. I think the videos, and his testimony is what saved him.
The prosecutor has made so many mistakes, they would love a mistrial so they could have a do-over. Notice the defense said 'with predjudice' meaning they cannot retry him on the same offences.
They deffinetly can cuz there will be a new judge
@@MoejiiOsmanTV Not without new evidence...
A mistrial is usually considered to be good for the defense.
@@MoejiiOsmanTV you obviously do not know how the judicial system works honey , do some research before opening your mouth about things you have no knowledge of ..
@@rreagan007 in most cases yes its good for the defense but the prosecution basically will get a "do over" i dunno how alot of u folks think Rittenhouse is gonna walk Scott free, he for sure will be found guilty of several of the firearm charges since he was underage and couldn't legally obtain them
I can't believe that prosecuter didn't get slapped with contempt of court.
He needs to be arrested for conspiracy
I say he was close
He should
Agreed
He needs to be disbarred
A year later and this video is still amazing.
How is this guy a lawyer wtf
Imagine Kyle at law school one day & his trial comes up as a case study.
Right? That would be really interesting.
"Hey guys look! I'm on TV!"
He won't even need to go to college he's gonna have half a billion dollars more than likely because of this.
Free 100%
If I was in that class, I'd get that autograph
He was not guilty on all charges
This is the best episode of
Better Call Saul
I have ever seen
Good comedic timing
Good
For
You
HE DEFECATED THROUGH A SUNROOF!
You win
I only watched breaking bad and this kept reminding me of that I don’t even remember why at this point dude really seems like an actor it’s so over the top
Binger must be a paid actor.
New York, California and Illinois citizens would never get a judge like Schroeder only prosecutors taking their constitutional rights away.
"You'd agree you can't shoot people who don't like your jokes, correct?"
This prosecutor. 🤣
@VoraY8 Thank you for this information Adrian
@VoraY8Hi Adrian my name is Poop McGee
@VoraY8 lmao same
@VoraY8 very cool adrian
@VoraY8 omg me too
"The judge is yelling at me. I'd better correct him on something trivial. Then he'll know I have the power and he'll back down. Whose court does he think this is anyway?"
He's hoping the Woke Providence will prove him right
I don't think this DA believes Judge Bruce Shroeder presides within the court rather than the district attorney. This is horrid. He is going on evidence tried in a public court of social media and corrupt press rather than doing his own homework.
The prosecutor is obviously a liberal Democrat trying to get points with the left on the national stage...that is all he is trying to do.
@@jlescoe21 The Prosecutor's conduct is "unethical" at best. Nobody should be able to refer to a defendant's silence as "wrongdoing". Has he ever heard of the Miranda Rights?
"You have the right to remain silent......"
The judge is clearly acting for the defence. Shocking.
So, you agree, that, you can't use deadly force to stop someone doing X, Y, Z
....correct, I didn't use deadly force to stop someone doing X, Y, Z, I used deadly force to protect my own life