Simon Jordan DEFENDS Man City's Spending & PRAISES The 'REMARKABLE' Manager, Team & Performances 👏
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 05. 2024
- talkSPORT's Simon Jordan praises Manchester City's performances on the pitch and defends the amount of money the club has spent.
Subscribe: / talksport
Enjoyed this CZcams video? 😍
🖥️ talkSPORT's Website: talksport.com/
📲 talkSPORT's Twitter: / talksport
📷 talkSPORT's Instagram: talksport?...
👤 talkSPORT's Facebook: / talksport
📱 talkSPORT's Tik Tok: / talksport
🔴 Download the talkSPORT app HERE! - talksport.com/apps/
🔎 Want to see if you feature on our CZcams channel? Check out our Best talkSPORT callers playlist: • The BEST talkSPORT Cal...
#talkSPORT
#premierleague
#simonjordan
#manchestercity - Sport
It’s always been about money , even when Fergie was in charge
People turn a blind eye because it's SAF. People forget he was on the verge of being sacked before United got a huge cash injection and went on to break transfer fee after transfer fee.
That's the fact! He had 115 charges need to be answer, but he still has the audacity to say not about money! He can just say his club has better management! Talking nonsense! And the title obviously misleading! Simon did not defend City! He also say is about money! Every club is about money, always is the manager make the different! He just has to say he is the best manager in town! Simple as that! But he don't has the gut to say it!
Biggest wage bill in the league is Man United not city???
Not if you include their secret Middle Eastern bank accounts
Probably not true with citys accountants ...
@@barbarohelm9697 is anything true...
weekly wages yes but after bonus last year we was at top
obviously true last season we have higher because we won treble so tons of bonus needs to be paid to players
Peps spot on about Man U and Chelsea
115 charges and ref fixing at Barcelona.. pep can't be trusted
Actually Simon - Utd have the highest wage bill and City are 2nd.....
Yeah? Then just dig a bit deep. City's wage structure has bonus only related to trophies and only top personal honours. Other clubs have very wide varities of bonus and very high share too. Ex: if Liverpool had won the titles, Salah's bonus would had been around twice of his yearly wage. With City, KDB and Haaland would get around 50% of their salary as bonus. Another 25% for golden boot.
And this is because City has very limited net spend in the last 3-4 years, so their wage structure is now not volatile.
As the case of United, well that's that. Nobody knows what those guys are doing.
@@deepakpandey8240 and your point is????
All clubs have a bonus structure, it’s not City’s fault that the others don’t get the bonus because they don’t win the trophies
@@Pitsy I am just saying that City being second has a reason because showing wages is only half truth unless you include the bonuses too.
Anyways, City's wage structure is fine. They have like 60% of the revenue into it. Which is very very healthy.
Speaks volume when you see City wage bill is lesser than Utd but come out on top with bonuses....it shows how performance oriented their structure is and how hungry City players are to earn it while the other team is just content and eating away at what they get
As if Simon has any credibility left. He changes his mind on the daily
the biggest closeted man united fan hahaha it shows
Yet here you are watching a video with him, and will probably continue to do so. Simon Jordan is your daddy.
@@giovannirojas3952 I listen to talkSPORT, not Simon Jordan. I’m your daddy
People who say it’s boring are just jealous of Manchester City.
No people like to see different winners not just the same team unless you support that team even liverpool in the 80's and man utd 90's people would say similar hings and how healthy can't be if one team dominates all the time
@richardandrews5972 if you want to see different winners every year, watch the EFL championship.
All top leagues are dominated by a few clubs. PSG in France, Barca and Real in Spain, Bayern in the Bundesliga etc. Even the CL is dominated by Real and they win it every year.
Manchester United has the biggest wage bill in the league and not City.
You said their manager is a cheque book one and you don't rate him, maybe you forgot what you say sometimes
Simon hates Pep becuz Pep is the exact opposite him ; A SUCCESSFUL MAN
Or he's been paid to say otherwise... City are still spending just not on players anymore
@@_A7X 😅😆
He never said “he didn’t rate him” at all, it was in comparison with klopp and said he thought klopp edged it out the two of them
Just to correct Mr Simon Jordan the biggest wage Bill in the league is Man united.
440 mil wage bill? more like less than half i think it just scracthes 200mil but even then its still slightly less than uniteds and only slightly above arsenal
City fans never argue that it's not about money, it is of course. What we want is for other teams to admit the same instead of believing myths that any success their own team ever had was achieved by finding orphans abandoned outside their ground, signing them up for 50p, paying them in bags of crisps and waving the magic football wand over them.
Any mid table club that wants to compete at the level City are at will need a similar amount of cash injected to mitigate the money generated over years of success by the handful of traditionally dominant clubs. It's the cost of doing business at that level.
I hope that City's dream comes true for some other clubs. This is part of the romance of the game surely?
If it does happen to let's say the likes of Sunderland or Leeds and Jordan wants to contemptuously disrespect them by saying they're 'manufactured' I suggest he avoids both cities.
If anything City fans whose club attracted 27k per game in the third tier have been overly kind to him and admirably tolerant of his mendacious twaddle.
Jordan's own team, Crystal Palace have never achieved an average attendance over 27k since the time of his ownership to the present day.
these people here doesnt want to read logic reasons...
biggest wage bill for 2024 is Manchester United
Thank you very much my friend these ppl on these huge platforms keep spreading misinformation
Citys wage bill for 2024 190.9 million
United wage bill for 2024 180.7 million
Yet these pair of numptys clapping each other on the back talking about misinformation, ye lot wouldn't know the truth about finances if it slapped ye in the face
Mental isnt it
Those wage bills don't include all yer dodgy off the book payments tho do they
@@chucky7826yeah because you know the ins and outs of what's going on at city 🤡🤡, stop regurgitating the garbage your listening to
Was United built on a rich butchers money, then Sky money? Was Liverpool built on Littlewoods Pools and Catalogue money? It's a similar in every era. Money gets you the talent and resources needed to get the best players and training facilities
Nice cope. Liverpool and Man Utd are proper clubs that earned their success. Man City are a state owned joke and will never be respected
You think littlewoods catalogue and and a rich butcher are comparable to the sheik mansours family worth one trillion dollars or a Russian oil baron like Abramovitch
Ooooo Kay
Correct. You spend money to get into the heavyweight class. But you still have to box
This season you can’t blame city for winning it again. It’s arsenal and Liverpool’s fault
And all the over teams in the league
Don't blame Arsenal, we got 4 points out of City. Liverpool got 2 out of them. The others did nothing.
@@obiobi9378does that win u the league? Who cares about that 💀
@@obiobi9378and? Lol you lot bottled the actually winnable games though so yeah all the blame is on only you all not anyone else
@@obiobi9378looking for help. Just win your games if want to win the league. Stop wanting other teams to do it for you.
Liverpool came from the old second division in the 60s because of Littlewoods money, united from money from becoming a PLC, Chelseas from Roman's money, Blackburn from Walkers money, football is and always will be about investment.
ok , but were they nation states with unlimited money and no concequences ? where do we stop ? Walker dried up , littlewoods didnt even make one massive signing , without a sale to fund it like Keegan and Rush , Forest and United did the big singings in those times. And Chelsea just like City needed stronger govenence from the Premier League to avoid the inbalance they created. When a players value gets inflatted it pushes wages sky high , look at Adebayor. Saudi And Abu Dhabai can buy EVERY club in the Premier League
@@adammohamed.. Nation State LOL, Abu Dhabi is the size of Liverpool Docks LA
@@andrewgurney6019 so is Qatar and they still had the power to get a World Cup , people want money they don’t want size and Abu Dhabi has lots of money. Hence Man City have gone from mediocrity to be in the best club in the world. It’s that’s simple
@@adammohamed.. And Liverpool became the City of Culture, just shows the depth of corruption la
@@andrewgurney6019 the level of corruption has been with us since Adam eat that apple. Where there’s money there’s corruption and in sport, you can’t be football & boxing for corruption.
Loads of clubs have had new investors & had a brief amount of success. Fulham were up there for a minute. Now it's Newcastle & folk love it. It's great when it's any other club but not when it's City. City have just done it better. When these phoney charges are cleared they should officially be crowned the GOAT.
Simons downfall continues
I agree. Even the whole claim about Salah that his not world class. Disgrace.
Simon Jordan turning into David Brent 5:46
😂😂😂😂surprised he didn't do the dance
I seem to remember in the 90's Man Utd were spending the most when they were winning titles, then Chelsea took over when they started spending more
I think you’ll find Blackburn and Newcastle spent the most. United got a lot of Academy players coming through.
@@adammohamed..for a decade? 🤨 Who broke more transfer records?
@@adammohamed..if you forget the fact that fergie broke the transfer record 8 times buying players from rival teams, then yeah, they did a good job of bringing up youth players
@@Jack-iu5um I mean Man United are a massive massive business that generates huge revenues. They didn’t just pick up a phone and ring a Sheikh ( which anyone can do by the way ) I’m not sure who these players were in the ( 1990s ) that you’re referring to Stam, Cole was a big one & Yorke. But who else ?
Shearer was both Blackburn & Newcastle , Collymore was Liverpool , even Wright was 91 and Arsenal.
Manchester City and Chelsea Have both changed the dynamics of the Premier league ( Abramovich was kicked out ) the nation state ownership have been banned after the one two punch of Abu Dhabi and Saudi Arabia.
Think about it logically Manchester
City owners have more money than 18 owners combined , and Newcastle owners have more money than Manchester City and the other 18 owners combine. Where does it stop.
I’m sure lots of thick twats that support Newcastle and City don’t care about football. They care about their clubs. I actually care about football more than my club. And I don’t want to see clubs go bust because their owner tries to take on unlimited oil money. It’s just not worth it.
I agree I've been a Manchester City fan for 40 years, I don't go anymore. Fed up with Ludicrous ticket prices, Shite Sanitized Atmospheres, silly kick off days and times to accommodate Sky and TNT sport's!!!
What a bunch of clowns! Utd in the last decade spent MORE i repeat MORE money than City! Difference is City bought Ruben Dias for less money than Maguire,Rodri for less than Pogba,Bernardo Silva for less than Mount,and the list goes on and on!
I’m an Arsenal fan and you can’t agree with that! Spot on
The problem we as CITY fans with Simons opinions are...Their is always a cavier to end with his opinion on city but never when it comes to other top six teams...
If it was solely based on money then we (Chelsea) and United should have won the title over the last 4-5 years.
How you spend the money is critical and city have spent it bloody well.
Who cares about being respected.
Being feared is better than be respected and everybody fears City.
That’s more than enough.
The taps on the table from pep killed me man😂😂😂😂
Its an extremely childish argument
CITY WINS= MONEY
CITY DOESNT WIN = MONEY DOESNT BUY TROPHIES
Talksport repeating the same topic for the whole season🙄🙄
So it's okay of its English money like Liverpool did when they where in the second tier out spending in the league above them on the run to their success? But not when it's Middle Eastern money? Colonial mentality at its finest. Also, Utd has the highest wage bilk in the Premier league. 😂
Simon actually stated what odds does it make if its middle eastern money, small minded bigot mentality tends to make people only here what they wat to here. Try clearing them ears out.
Middle Eastern money = Opression of Women and Gays. So yeah, it's a bit different.
Suddenly, we like the Arabs after crying for about 12 years that Qatar has a World Cup. Hypocrisy at its finest. You were for sale it’s a simple as that.
@@adammohamed.. dhur hala hala assuda
Simon Jordan bang on the money again.
Simon Jordan hasn't a clue
Simon doesnt know the difference between Abu Dhabi/UAE and Saudi Arabia and also the fact that Man United has the biggest wage bill in world football.
City players work harder than anyone, they are consistsnt, they have more desire and that has nothing to do with money
$$$$$ talk
@@cxv6367 $$$$$? Or £££££?
Rubbish utter rubbish.
😂
@@Ramps-rc9iyIt's not rubbish.. They're facts and you don't wanna face it 😂
Was Liverpool built on Littlewoods pools money... Yes they was.
Those clubs were built when the players were paid about the same as a plumber
They became powerful because of their footballing dynasty built over decades
The difference in wealth is now stratospheric
@@malcmitchell9738 That was the case then too. The difference is there was no source to make this much noise around then. Nobody even remembers the team that got relegated that year or the one which finished 10th. I am sure they had not spent anywhere near Liverpool during those times.
Decades before, million was what a billion is now. After 20 years, we will see clubs with 3-4 billion revenue and spending like a billion on transfer market. That's just how money and inflation works. Subscription prices increase, merchandise become costly, tickets are extravagant. Of course there is more money in football now and more will be in future. That's how it's supposed to happen.
@@deepakpandey8240yup ... Today too, the modern fans are the softest and sorest losers
@@deepakpandey8240 complete nonsense
The mansour family are worth one trillion dollars
You think that Kenny Dalgish fee 440,000 a club record was the same as Jack grealish 114 000 000?
440000 is about 2.7 mill in todays money
The players were lucky to be able to buy a pub when they retired
Nottingham Forest were able to sign the most expensive players including the first million pound player
There is no comparison to the likes of City and Chelsea today. None.
@@malcmitchell9738 If you are gonna go that path then compare the revenue and wages that your dear club pays now and it paid then.
Don't shy behind mathmatics.
Pep, the greatest manager to ever manage in England.
Nope, Paisley and fergie.
@@Ramps-rc9iy 😂😂😂😂😂 Pep CLEAR by MILES! 😂
@@Ramps-rc9iy nope, you're wrong. I'm right.
@@_A7X Ooh hit a nerve there, let me guess you know fcuk all about football other than from when the name was changed for the top division to the premier league 🤡🤣.
@@Ramps-rc9iy nope, you're wrong I'm right.
United, Liverpool and Chelsea have spent more than City..
Let's stop creating false realities of City spending 10 billion
No one believes this 😂
@@Froggyk123 What do you mean believe it? it was quite literally on sky sports the other night with all the teams spending
A ridiculous comparison
@@randomgeneratedname6035 115 will show otherwise.
related party transfers ?
Talksport isn't the place for sensible dialogue about football. It's nothing more than an outlet for controversial takes to provide clickbait material.
Everyone knows City wouldn't be a big gun without oil money, but no way all this current success is just down to money. This is about Pep. If a billion pound squad guaranteed you titles, why are Chelsea only fighting for a Europa League spot? And why haven't Man Utd won the Prem for 11yrs? Without Pep, Liverpool would be dominant no matter how much money Abu Dhabi threw at their squad.
3:08 should be a compliment. Tesco should take note
Let's put respect to City and Pep
Undoubtedly the PL is a greatly successful product but its also the reason for the national side underperforming. One season left with Pep, enjoy it while you can.
Until he signs a contract extension in summer - haters gonna have to hate for a few more years
Been hearing you people repeat that line for the last 5 years.
Pep in a séance had me dying laughter😂😂😂
Do mention city turnover. More than 700 million a year
Over 15 top clubs have ex city acadamy players all sold at profit
3 of the city players last night v spurs cost 15 million yes 15 million for 3 of last nights team. Is that a lot of money no.
Oh city have one of the smallest squads in the league 22 players
6 of whom cost zilch
Be careful for deformation Jim everyone is innocent until proven guilty so don’t land your self in contempt !!!
Simon is right just so many sour grapes who cant stand to lose and would rather dumb down city's achievements for being smart. It wasnt cash that won them the league but 11 players with a bloody good coach without peers in the league and it hurts most.
You generally need money and alot of it to be continually successful but rightly said it's not all about that. City haven't spent as much as other teams over the most recent period but have won more than anyone by a country mile. Even if all the top clubs had spent exactly the same we would either see City being even better or the other teams being worse, either way City would still be winning. That comes down to how the money is deployed, who is making decision and who is trusted to carry out the objectives.
City have been best in class for years and that is down to people doing their jobs at the highest level, has nothing to do with if Mancini was paid more than was was reported or if sponsors were spending more than was reported. The best thing to happen to every other club was City to get charges (alot of which are hilarious and will be thrown out and others have to be proven) as fans and media can just throw out "115 charges" as an excuse rather than looking at themselves (which I bet if the PL did they'd find charges they could throw at everyone). Get good or get gone.
I would agree city have been very good on the pitch and had great success however you stating it has nothing to do with with mancini and sponsors would be incorrect if city are found guilty of the PL allegations. It would give increased spending on players etc that would not be available without. That said city have not been found guilty of anything and I am not implying guilt just that if true they would have had an advantage over those complying.
@@Samivermusic Only if the increased spending was significant enough that would have stopped the club being able to buy them in the first place. We have no idea to the finance limits that the charges discuss. If the over spend breaks the rule but by an extremely small amount (in relative football terms) then that makes no difference to being able to buy a player or not.
The rules are also inheritably unfair against clubs that want to grow and have the capital to do so in the first place. You can labor the club with mountains of debt and let a club rot but if an owner wants to invest then your hamstrung. So even if City are found guilty of overspending, to me the lying would be the worse charge since the rules are not fit for purpose to begin with and just change every year anyway.
@@BlueBloodPenn yeah in the case of mancini it is alleged to be as small as 1million which is nothing really however it could be a lot larger if some things the der speigel docs are not completely fabricated. Nobody knows until the hearing and any subsequent media coverage. As for ffp I think uefa made an error calling it fair play especially as they acknowledge in one of their yearbooks that they know bigger established clubs have more revenue. I still think they did need to do it after their financial report in 2008 showed 50% of their member clubs were running at losses of which 20% were at serious financial risk. It does not work though and I think a lot of options like a salary cap would be challenged by players /agents and imo the likely winners their would be the players. It's a mess
Why do you expect City to spend more than everyone else and they already have the best coach and the best foundation ? Once Pep, Silva & KDB go , there will spend the most again like when City needed them full backs and they spent £250m. That’s what having unlimited money is there for.
@@adammohamed.. I never said I expect City to spend more than everyone else.
i agree
I am trying to understand simons point .... I think he agrees pep is the best at what he does don't you think you should demand the most money you can earn, to simon he will be the best manager if he was working for free
Everything’s about money. We are all on this planet to earn as much MONEY as we possibly can!
People take offense because when liverpool win even a carabao cup they are the best team and when city win a treble they did it with money. If all the big 6 clubs have money then money should not be the measure of success
Lol the biggest wage bill is Man United....😅😅😅
It’s always been about money (even back in the day perhaps) and you’re kidding yourself if you think it’s not. Finally someone says it. The top clubs in each league has waaaaay more of it comparatively than the rest.
Does it mean it guarantees success not always but that’s where management steps in and there’s only a few like Pep that can achieve it. Not even a City fan but do admire what they’ve been able to do consistently 😮
There are outliers to this statement (a team outside of the big six or four or whatever it is now) but that’s seldom if ever true.
Man city don't have the biggest wage bill actually Simon. Fact check
Anybody who thinks Mc Allister should really have cost less than Nunes at City is silly. You can only spend what's quoted. The quality of players aren't really less
All the top clubs have big backers. 💷💷💷💷
Abu Dhabi money . Saudhi money. But American dollar is ok 😅😅. Nice
Man City ain’t got the biggest wage bill either so again wrong facts that title is currently held by united FACT !!!
Biggest wage bill for the 2023/24 season is Manchester United, he should talk about facts and leave his wishful thinking to one side. By the way utd wrote the book on sugar daddies starting as early as 1902.
Waiting for mr Krabs to burst in…did somebody mentioned MONEY 🦀
So now money isn’t a bad thing because other clubs are spending more than City 😂😂😂😂😂😂
It's also called rules, it's not the wild west ffs.
Name me a top premier league club who hasn't got money?
Name me a single seaon after 1977 Man City challenged for the title before the Oil ? Theres a reason you didn’t. And I’m not talking about Edward Park and Ali Benarbia titles. You can talk about littlewoods club all you want , and everyone has money all you want.. You are the product of a weak era where the next 4 clubs have 1 title in the last 20 years and weak govenence that allow ANYONES money in until doesnt suit them anymore. Your owners picked you as you was FOR SALE and your privious currupt owners was getting done for curruption ( some things never change )
@@adammohamed.. Get on your camel and ride in to the sunset. 🤡
@@adammohamed.. Listen you ain't a real football fan.
Now tell me who you follow not support due to not being in England...
@@adammohamed.. All clubs has big backers... Liverpool, man utd, chelski, arsenal, spurs.
You know jack 💩
@@adammohamed.. YOU NEVER NAMED ME THE CLUB YOU 🤡🤣
‘Only Ange will know by full time?’ Erm nah we’ll all know at that point
Highest wage bill for 2022/23 season? Yes. Man City won the treble and had to pay out big bonuses. Take the bonuses out and Man City do not pay the highest basic wages.
Exactly, if Liverpool had won more they would have had higher wages than City almost every year.
Best team in Premier League History, 6 out of 7... Farmers league at this point
Simon just goes against the norm the create content. Its old now
And boring. He is the last person to talk about money. How many victims has he left behind unpaid.
Funny how mr beans love-child is never around when it's city under the microscope
We are only 2nd in the wage League because of the bonus payments due to winning the Treble
You Thick failed club owner
I don't know but i think Winning Three in a row twice is harder than 4 in a row.
As humans it makes sense to bring the best into such a sport as well as other places. You do it and people start complaining. You want to massage a players mind till its all marshmallow and squidgy? It will cost you. Business is business and money makes the world go around as it is at the moment. What is needed in life and knowing how to go and get it.
It is about money. No guarantees Klopp would do same at Man C or Pep would achieve at Livepool.
Built on Abu Dhabi money ? Every club has been built on money. Liverpool in the seventies and Utd in the eighties and nineties bought all the best players.
What 😲
Simon Jordan backs city...
😂
Hardly 'remarkable' is it now 🙄
Man United has a 205M wage bill this season
They have bunch of overpayed players. Those who came on Camel and pumped money in those club with 0 tradition,that club will not have bright future.
City don't get enough respect. If theywin the league they ARe the best English football team ever. First ever domestic treble, which itself is't lauded enough. Matched United's treble, and then four leagues in a row, which is unprecedented in England.
or is it a weak era ? Arsenal and Liverpool , 1 title in 20 years between them , worst United team in 30 years and worst Chelsea team since pre Ambramovich.. So even if they win it 6 times , ive seen better
The reason Fergie, Wenger & Abramovich didn’t win 4 in a row was because they didn’t have access to the weakest era in Premier league history. The next four teams after City have one title in the last 20 years. That tells you everything. Those 3 other teams were around together so they canceled each other out.
The money clubs like Arsenal are spending now is not even close to the quality of what city where spending to get the best at the time they were spending it.
Even now that clubs luke Arsenal are spending to catch up, Man city is still buying a defender for 77M.
Arsenal spent 72m on Pepe when City's record transfer was still 54m De Bruyne. Arsenal have never spent lightly.
@TP-pq9xx do you realize Man City already spent money to fully build their team by 2018. Man City already have the best player by then, and they won the title 2017 2018 when arsenal have a team that can't even qualify for the Europa league.
The signing of Pepe then was seen as a one-off for Arsenal cause arsenal don't ever pay that much for a player.
You are definitely about 14 years old to even think arsenals spending is anywhere close to man city in past 20 years
@@yemi9196 Every club’s record signing is a one-off, brilliant observation by you.
😂😂😂I like Simon man
Then if we are going to use that argument that “ it is all about money”, then why people are crying foul when people spend their money to get the best coach / manager and got good players ( i would argument that Pep didnt buy the best players in their positions in the world , he bought the best players according to him that would play his style of football or philosophy). Yes it is all about and it is business, now in any kind of business deals its rare to find morals or people with conscious. So people must not play angels and say City did not do thing the “ right “ way. I would agree with Pep before FFP every team that had money was gunning or chasing the best players and unfortunately those are the teams he mentioned including spanish teams and italian teams. And the is a reason why FFP came along its because Fifa wanted fairness in the sport. Well in sport the is no fairness, you do whatever you can to gain an advantage to your opponent or opposition. Its a game and you so whatever you can to gain and advantage and win. Thats why teams chase the best players and managers. 🤷🏽♂️
So in the same day he defends the cheaters and also said Emery could get sacked next year, go have a lay down Simon.
now we are babbies because we were pointing out that you shouldnt count us out. Dont change your tune now keep the same energy you silly goat
Fake title? 😏🤣
City are not known as Gods own team for nothing.
He’s not wrong. Arsenal fans think they’re the “underdogs” and doing something special. No you’ve just spent ridiculous money 🤣
Arsenal are 100% the underdogs, and are 100% doing something special. Don’t be such a hater
@@bg7393Arsenal aren't any underdogs STFU 😂
They've made a lot of records this season with defense and attacking status 😂
Stop with the preemptive excuses if you inevitably don't win the league 😂
@@bg7393 you’re deluded if you think that 🤣 the league is and has always reflected who’s the biggest spenders. If anything Arsenal are underachieving massively considering they’ve been biggest spenders in recent years and won less than West Ham 🤣🤣
@@cozzy9208 city blow more on wages. people like you think transfer values are the only costs.
It’s not all about how much you spent tho is it! It’s how you spend that money! Look at United and Chelsea, simply chucking money at the situation doesn’t guarantee success
Everythings about money hence why the pgmol kept liverpool down, cant show its not all about money...
Man United and Arsenal built on USA money.. so football is always about investment
Was Arsenal and Liverpool built on American money yes it was and the list goes further with Europeans money. Your agenda on Arabs countries and Russia won’t destroy their clubs. Small minds gossip , medium minds discuss events and big minds discuss ideas . Man city owners are big minds.
Your English media should first evolve to medium mind this century and let’s hope as an auditor in a millennium you can evolve to big minds. 😊
I love pep but yes it the money and players you brought to build the squad. Give it time and more signings Arsenal and Chelsea will over take city
Sooner people come to terms with how boring football is the better.
There is no guarantee in football if you have money.
But you need money!
And then you need a manager as Pep.
City is the best football style in world football.
And successful.
Only when they are stupid in penalties they are out.
This is PL and not Scottish Carot League,Croatian League or Ligue PSG!!!
The most difficult league in the world.
All the opponents of City plays and stays with 11 players in his own half.
You have to break and destroy that.This is really difficult because 90% of the teams are counterattack teams like Real,Arsenal or Hotlosers.
Only Liverpool not.
Therefore Klopp Liverpool against Pep City was the biggest match in World Football.
Both played attacking football.
Not Barca against Real because Real plays always counterattacking football in these matches.
City is the number 1!!!
If you want the PL-you have to let City behind you.
The FA Cup and CL the same situation.
That is the truth!!!
Mr Cuardiola, you are *not* the best couch .. but your team has a lot of money to buy you the best players - finish n klaar
What about Guardiola?
*coach
But it is completely fine when it comes from Western money?
Where did Western wealth originate from? Now it’s all of a sudden better than money coming from non Western countries?
Money is money Simon. It's a little xenophobic when you keep mentioning where the money comes from. The American oligarchs have taken over English football but no one is talking about it. Pep is right, if it was all about money man united and Chelsea would still be winning over everybody else. It takes money to complete with the likes of real Madrid etc
United and Chelsea won because of money , and will again. Just now its City time, because of money. I dont rememeber the best playing for City and them challeging before the Oil in 2008.
I did see Chelsea buy old players before the oligarch like Desailly and Zola but they were about to go bust. Unlimited money = unlimited possibilities. There is a reason Villa, Everton and Spurs dont win the league.
@@adammohamed.. it takes money to compete my friend, where the money comes from should be irrelevant. Being a top club that's winning everything it's gonna be natural you're outspending everyone else
@@jamaicanoproblemmon711 so basically all it took was a phone call to go from bang average to the richest club in the world and able to sign anyone ? It’s just a little too simple for me.
This isn’t war or even cut throat business, it’s a sporting competition. if you want it to be about signing the best owner with that comes big DANGER!! there’s big egos and they’re all gonna spend billions. Some clubs are gonna go out of business. They all can’t win. 🥇
And when it all crashes and burns, you’re going to have people just standing in their catching flies with their open mouth, just staring like a numpty.
That’s why I respect the German model
Every club is designed to make profit and fans run 51%. Lower ticket prices, free transport, full stadium and a nice feel good factor that we haven’t sold our soul to the devil. 😈
@@jamaicanoproblemmon711 and it’s very important to know where the money comes from playing this xenophobic card is a little too simple as well. Russian oligarch and autocratic Arabs guess what word they don’t know or hear ( that word is ( NO! ) ) and guess what they can’t do in this country ( England 🏴 ) keep their hand out the cookie jar , so we’re inviting corruption.. And how many charges do City have ??? It’s a bit like how Qatar got the World Cup , guess what we’re going back to that region again in a few years time It’s called the World Cup isn’t it ?
So it is important who we’re dealing with and whose money is what. Isn’t the PSG chairman on the board of UEFA ? So there’s a pattern developing now. And I always say if it looks like it has been talk like a duck it’s a duck.
Ps I’m Arab myself.
@@adammohamed.. believe me I expect rival fans to be upset after seeing your club knocked off your perch by a newcomer. But what Chelsea and city had done were to provide more competition to what seemed to an everlasting dominance of the traditional clubs
Pep GOAT
How did Arsenal bribe There way into the League was that with farthings ? Or pound notes
No, football is about football but for all the people who dont really care that much about football and can see it gets ALL the attention, for those people its about money.
Also known as heartless wankers.
Spurs gunning for City really typical talksport click bait.😂
Its changed to "do it for North London" now - utter gash
City need to stop sending 115 and their wage bill out on the field to beat every other team ,time they start sending football players out on the pitch ,these 115 charges is playing better football than Messi , Renaldo , not to mention the subs , the biggest wage bill , I think they play better than the 115 who is the starting eleven , envy is killing the football spirit , there was no breach of financial fair play when Manchester united has all the biggest name in football playing at Manu at the same time ,as soon as the European own clubs can't win a trophy , financial fair play is the problem , past ten years these top four as they are called ,spend over two and half billion dollars on players , what has they got to show for their billions ,only the 000,000,000,
MAN UNITED HAVE THE HIGHEST WAGE BILL JORDAN !! DO YOUR F###### HOMEWORK BEFORE TALKING !!
City have not beaten us our scored a goal at our new ground yet.
If you're spursy we beat you 1 nil last time out
Yes they have!