Nice! Looks to be a lighter version of the PLA's Type 99 MBT (50T vs 60T) with a different engine bay design...the missile guided projectiles are very impressive
@@humansvd3269 Licensed by the Russians or not, this is something very good in theory but not really used in actual battlefield, the introduction of hard kill active protection would make these little missiles quite useless, so this really is a good to have in Russian and Chinese tanks and China has put most of their effort in developing new generation of APFSDS ammo instead.
@@timothy1949 Yeah but not every vehicle is going to have APS. ATGM's are still extremely useful against: 1. APCs 2. Trucks 3. Armored Cars like Humvees/MRAP 4. Fortified positions 5. Machine gun nests 6. Buildings 7. Basically anything aside from advanced MBT and some IFVs.
Thailand brought 60 MBT 3000.The VT-4 120 mm cannon can shoot a projectile 62 miles using magnetic plasma coating.The VT-4 travels at 70K/hr. using 1600hp turbo-diesel.
@1:04 on the gun at the back of the tank, is that another short 3-4 inch barrel underneath it that swivels horizontally? And is that another camera or sight under that barrel?
Shout Dovahkiin Really? I say shoot it with an AT-4 HEAT IN THE FRONT ARC OF THE TURRET. IF IT SURVIVES HIT IT WITH AN NLAW TOP ATTACK ROUND. IF IT'S ALSOOOOOO SURVIVES THAT THEN I WILL BE IMPRESSED. IN THE MEAN TIME NO.
lol pretty much any modern tank can take the hit from At-4 on the turret front, even old T54 with ERA added can handle that. HEAT war head is not that good vs modern armor, APFSDS is the challenging one.
@@QuM3 the VT4 has never been seen with heavy armor side skirt, but this should be a customization option, the NORINCO VT5 light tank has displayed various combination of armor layout including extra side armor skirt.
It was a mockup, obviously the real thing isn't made of plywood. In the same way that ammunition, missiles, rockets etc that are displayed at arms exhibitions are usually models.
He broke it in a bar fight. You should see what happened to the other guy. It's a joke btw. CFF is an old Jane's guy even before the Internet and youtube.
Interesting because some guy above just said it looks like an abrams. but anyway, no version of T72 will compete with this, not even the latest T72B3M because they are generation apart. T90MS would be the closest competitor to the VT4 and I would say the T90MS is superior despite it is cheaper.
The standard would be to exceed all variants of T90 except T90MS, slightly worst/similar/slight better than T90MS (don't really know). Option to install active protection system would improve protection a lot.
And in the age where everyone and their mother seems to have ATGM's growing on their backyard, why would you buy this over T-90 if you had to buy a tank with a autoloader?
Konrad Ford; all too true but, the Ukrainian Malyshev company only delivered 25 of the 49 contracted for. Also, as it turns out a Chinese T-99 (an A2 I think) MBT busted a front road wheel right out of the hull at a bathalon with Russian T-80's or 90's something. Sorry, I really don't remember the details of the tank bathalon where this happened as I was in such shock. I remember not liking the looks of the T-99 hull casting, had never seen such and didn't even think it could happen. One would hazard a guess that they stick welded it back on, ground down the weld and painted it over till they can blame some private for the damage. Now everyone in the world knows how to demobilize any of these beast with anything from a 25 mm on up. Look out Gen. Chalermchai Sitthisart, (Commander-in-Chief) Royal Thai Army, you better check on what you're getting. All this leaving one to wonder what quality of steel this VT-4 scaled down export version of the T-99 might be using. For sure it would be something the Chinese ZPT98 125 mm main gun could shoot APFSDS through at 5,000 m. Another thing is that, I was wrong about the VT-4 employing a Renk automatic transmission as it has a Ch1000 series homemade in-house transmission. Gen. Chalermchai Sitthisart, you better melt down them Bulldogs and make your own VT-4's. The Renk EMS 350 transmission is a drop-in replacement for T-72 type tank transmissions. Maybe you should see if you can get Renk France and either Klimov or Honeywell to hook-up a turboshaft engine so you can have a real tank. Also a laser protected Stadiametric/Stereoscopic range finder with a very well trained in Technique of Fire would gunner would help more than anything to get the all-important first round kill.
The one lost the wheel is a type 96B which is an upgraded version of type 96, the type 96 was a cheaper tank design to be mass produce, while type 99 was elite tank with pretty much everything better but more expensive to make, this VT4 is more like a lighter version of type 99A, they have the same type of engine
one of the reason Thailand gave up the T84 Oplot is they found that the Ukrainian have difficulty to produce and deliver the tank and they used recycled parts from older T80 tanks for Thailand's order. And before the VT4 there is no foreign users of newly made Chinese armor, the only exception would be Sudan with their base model of type 96 tanks, which scored 4 T72 kills in a 2012 conflict. Do your homework.
The owner of the company where I work wants to save 25% on the purchase of 6 trucks and chose a Chinese brand and did not want MAN or Mercedes. Within a year he was without trucks
Trucks driving all over South America, Africa in much worse conditions that Benz dared to set up dealership would disagree. The owner of the company you worked for got scammed and that’s that
This type of tank is really not the best for Philippine, it is too heavy over 50 tons, the light MBT like VT5 is what really Philippine need, since light MBT have enough armor to deal with terrorists and can be used on rough terrain which heavy MBT wont able to used on.
I like the chassis and the Renk EMS 350 transmission, but nothing else. I'd much rather see Klimov GTD-1250 engine in it and just about anybody's elesis turret (other than Russian or Chinese):
This tank has a more powerful engine, it is the original 1500hp engine used on the type-99A tank, but since this tank is lighter, it was reduced to 1200-1300hp to extended the lifespan, so if needed, this engine can output 1500hp without any changes.
EXplorer you know that the Ussr and China worked togeher very closely, it is like the Leopard 2 nd the M1 Abrams, they also got out of a joint program so by your logic you could say, the M1 Abrams is just a Copy of the Leopard 2, they have a similar suspension !!11!
Thailand is buying this? When? They already are into Ukraine for 200 T-84 Oplots, which I believe about 50 have been delivered? ASFAICT The the Oplot is far superior to anything Thailand immediate neighbors can field and superior to anything currently in SEA. Who is Thailand planing to defend against with such heavy tanks if indeed they are also buying the beast in the video above? Thailand has come a long way since the Stingrays and M60a3s they had for so long.
@@possiblyadickhead6653 you know that and didnt get picked up by some men in uniform because the west have transparency unlike some totalitarian shithole
What do you expect at made in china technology? Advance but low quality product thats why no one realy rely on their product.. maybe the guy explain it his arms made in china also😂😂😂 lol...
You are probably a Filipino, so you probably can't ever say anything good about China or the Chinese. You criticize the Chinese government, the Chinese military, the Chinese industry, Chinese infrastructure, scientific and technological expertise, sporting achievements, the Chinese education, healthcare and housing sectors, etc etc as well as individual Chinese people. But what exactly does the Philippines make? Compare Chinese cities with Filipino cities, Chinese schools, hospitals, airports, factories, housing projects, etc with those of the Philippines. Your dislike of China and the Chinese is pathetic and laughable, like Bolivians or Haitians laughing and criticising Canada or the USA.
I don't mean to be rude but China wouldn't get that far without Soviet/Russian technology. The VT-4 is based on the Al-Khalid, which is pretty much based on the Type 90 family and these tanks are clearly based on the T-72. China simply copied the T-72's hull back then. The 125mm smoothbore gun, the ATGM with a range of 5km, the auto-loader...the Soviet Union had it first, decades ago! And Norinco has the guts to claim their VT-4 is better than Russia's new T-14? I highly doubt that the VT-4 will keep up with a T-90M.
You start with VT4 being a copy of T72, then go on and compare the VT4 to the T90MS, which is the latest and most powerful model of T90, and you said Norinco has the guts to claim VT4 is better than the T14 (which they didn't). You are confused, proof read before posting.
Thailand is buying this piece of crap? Please for the love of God do not buy this my Thai friends. Get the Leo2 series instead. This thing will fall apart in Combat!! It will become a target practice for Russian, American and European tanks!!
@@GBR9794 Challenger is a piece of crap. Still using rifled gun and with that weight can't go nowhere in Thailand. Not to mention the shiti maneuverability. Challenger is a fucking dinosaur, compared to Leopard and Abrams.
Yes, Thailand is buying this piece of crap and ditching the T84 oplot they originally selected, and this piece of crap is more expensive than the oplot. And even India is not stupid enough to buy over priced western tanks, fighter from France? okay, tanks from Europe? no thanks. Stop leaving comments without thinking with your tiny dick and get a live.
Not impressed, no sure it can last even few months just running on road. why they have hire English speaking guy to advertise their fake stuff. All Bullshit.
No one has to impress you, because you have absolutely no concept anyway. A 52 tonnes tank with 125mm auto loading gun with variousprojectile and high penetrating APFSDS ammo, automatic gearing transmission, third generation CITV and battlefield management system would be considered an advanced tank by modern standard. But what should we expect from a guy who doesn't even know what Jane's is? Hire English speaking guy? you are out of your fucking mind.
@@dhirendralamba5119 are you Indian? What does your own country design and manufacture? Are your own country's products considered to be better than the Chinese (by the rest of the world)?
I love shameless chinese, you guys have been spying, copying and stealing American like crazy. There is nothing original about chinese products. I won’t even take any chinese items for free and continue to staunchly support made in India, made in Japan and made in USA. Just recently your rocket to moon which lifted with style but bite the dust like typical chinese. You guys should think about living a free life and not like slaves of thugs from Beijing. Remove your blinders and join Hong Kong movement, citizens of Hong Kong are self respecting, proud and courageous people and that is way whole world supporting them.
I like the digital camoflauge.
Nice! Looks to be a lighter version of the PLA's Type 99 MBT (50T vs 60T) with a different engine bay design...the missile guided projectiles are very impressive
Aur0ra12 Licensed by the Russians. Should be good because of that.
@@humansvd3269 Licensed by the Russians or not, this is something very good in theory but not really used in actual battlefield, the introduction of hard kill active protection would make these little missiles quite useless, so this really is a good to have in Russian and Chinese tanks and China has put most of their effort in developing new generation of APFSDS ammo instead.
@@timothy1949 Yet not every tank have a APS system, it's still rather very expensive, even the US was only considering tob introduce it lately
@@timothy1949 Yeah but not every vehicle is going to have APS. ATGM's are still extremely useful against:
1. APCs
2. Trucks
3. Armored Cars like Humvees/MRAP
4. Fortified positions
5. Machine gun nests
6. Buildings
7. Basically anything aside from advanced MBT and some IFVs.
And with wheel of feature 😂😂
This looks very capable.
Thailand brought 60 MBT 3000.The VT-4 120 mm cannon can shoot a projectile 62 miles using magnetic plasma coating.The VT-4 travels at 70K/hr. using 1600hp turbo-diesel.
you mean 6.2 miles not 62
It has 125 mm cannon
@1:04 on the gun at the back of the tank, is that another short 3-4 inch barrel underneath it that swivels horizontally? And is that another camera or sight under that barrel?
this is powerful tank , Chris left hand broken because he touch that tank with his left hand
haha😂
Love your videos
if they worked hard on the weight issue the Chinese tank is very useful for mechanized and armored divisions affiliate the Navy forces ..
Very advanced.
Shout Dovahkiin indeed
Shout Dovahkiin Really? I say shoot it with an AT-4 HEAT IN THE FRONT ARC OF THE TURRET. IF IT SURVIVES HIT IT WITH AN NLAW TOP ATTACK ROUND. IF IT'S ALSOOOOOO SURVIVES THAT THEN I WILL BE IMPRESSED. IN THE MEAN TIME NO.
lol pretty much any modern tank can take the hit from At-4 on the turret front, even old T54 with ERA added can handle that. HEAT war head is not that good vs modern armor, APFSDS is the challenging one.
@@jesusf.2600 AT4? seriously? writing in capital letters does not hide the fact that you are easily impressed.
"Slat Armor on the side" I saw this up close,, it was plywood!!.
This is just a presentation, you wouldn't bring a fully armed predator drone with live ammunition to a showcase.
BS,, German Main Battle Tank didn't come with cardboard armor skirt
@@QuM3 the VT4 has never been seen with heavy armor side skirt, but this should be a customization option, the NORINCO VT5 light tank has displayed various combination of armor layout including extra side armor skirt.
It was a mockup, obviously the real thing isn't made of plywood.
In the same way that ammunition, missiles, rockets etc that are displayed at arms exhibitions are usually models.
what happen to his arm?
lolz maybe
Destroyer of all things crushed by VT4
He broked it.
He broke it in a bar fight. You should see what happened to the other guy. It's a joke btw. CFF is an old Jane's guy even before the Internet and youtube.
Surprising that norinco do not adapt bustle auto loader.which will allow the tank to fire longer rod apdsfs rd.
They did it on VT5
Scratch a little deeper and you'll find a T-72?
Sure, and a kangaroo scrotum.
Interesting because some guy above just said it looks like an abrams. but anyway, no version of T72 will compete with this, not even the latest T72B3M because they are generation apart. T90MS would be the closest competitor to the VT4 and I would say the T90MS is superior despite it is cheaper.
What sort of armor protection does it have, no mention there!
The standard would be to exceed all variants of T90 except T90MS, slightly worst/similar/slight better than T90MS (don't really know). Option to install active protection system would improve protection a lot.
Modern & Highly Potent Tank...
Well done China superpower
And in the age where everyone and their mother seems to have ATGM's growing on their backyard, why would you buy this over T-90 if you had to buy a tank with a autoloader?
Because it is simply better
"..What happened to you arm??!
How come the quality is limited to 360p?
When videos are first uploaded to youtube the lower resolutions versions become available sooner.
空调格力造，掌握核心科技
那肯定稳了
Konrad Ford; all too true but, the Ukrainian Malyshev company only delivered 25 of the 49 contracted for. Also, as it turns out a Chinese T-99 (an A2 I think) MBT busted a front road wheel right out of the hull at a bathalon with Russian T-80's or 90's something. Sorry, I really don't remember the details of the tank bathalon where this happened as I was in such shock. I remember not liking the looks of the T-99 hull casting, had never seen such and didn't even think it could happen.
One would hazard a guess that they stick welded it back on, ground down the weld and painted it over till they can blame some private for the damage. Now everyone in the world knows how to demobilize any of these beast with anything from a 25 mm on up. Look out Gen. Chalermchai Sitthisart, (Commander-in-Chief) Royal Thai Army, you better check on what you're getting.
All this leaving one to wonder what quality of steel this VT-4 scaled down export version of the T-99 might be using. For sure it would be something the Chinese ZPT98 125 mm main gun could shoot APFSDS through at 5,000 m. Another thing is that, I was wrong about the VT-4 employing a Renk automatic transmission as it has a Ch1000 series homemade in-house transmission.
Gen. Chalermchai Sitthisart, you better melt down them Bulldogs and make your own VT-4's. The Renk EMS 350 transmission is a drop-in replacement for T-72 type tank transmissions. Maybe you should see if you can get Renk France and either Klimov or Honeywell to hook-up a turboshaft engine so you can have a real tank. Also a laser protected Stadiametric/Stereoscopic range finder with a very well trained in Technique of Fire would gunner would help more than anything to get the all-important first round kill.
The one lost the wheel is a type 96B which is an upgraded version of type 96, the type 96 was a cheaper tank design to be mass produce, while type 99 was elite tank with pretty much everything better but more expensive to make, this VT4 is more like a lighter version of type 99A, they have the same type of engine
Very nice lovely
Is like a medium tank, but very low .
The body is very familiar to Abrams
I swear he always has a sling
He is also a part time stuntman.
Foreign users of newly made Chinese armor complained that the hulls were peeling from age. I think they're recycling older tanks.
Older tanks from cold war Era probably, newer 21st century MBTS? I don't think so. This one costs a shit ton, not much cheaper than Western ones.
Foreign users of newly made Chinese armour ... Can you quote the source of this info, which country ?
one of the reason Thailand gave up the T84 Oplot is they found that the Ukrainian have difficulty to produce and deliver the tank and they used recycled parts from older T80 tanks for Thailand's order. And before the VT4 there is no foreign users of newly made Chinese armor, the only exception would be Sudan with their base model of type 96 tanks, which scored 4 T72 kills in a 2012 conflict. Do your homework.
Bet someone will say it's a copy.
because it IS A COPY
Heat exchange on the back of turret looks exposed.
yes,its Air Conditioning. Aim that, you will fuck crews inside,
lol how can it dump the hot air out, if it is not exposed?
They took a lot of inspiration from Minecraft
China really knows his game.because of soviet union china learn a lot about tank and even how to sell them.vt4 look more promising than t14 armata.
重点是空调！！！！！！！！
刘一刀 没错
จัดต่ออีก ทบบ
The owner of the company where I work wants to save 25% on the purchase of 6 trucks and chose a Chinese brand and did not want MAN or Mercedes. Within a year he was without trucks
Trucks broke I hope
Trucks driving all over South America, Africa in much worse conditions that Benz dared to set up dealership would disagree. The owner of the company you worked for got scammed and that’s that
Let's wait a year, I will come here next year.
haha the show must go on. this guy is committed..
Nice i wish our President Duterte purchase this tank for Philippines Army and Marine
KRIS TENGCO so you ohilipinos like shitty tanks? Oh cool go for it.
This type of tank is really not the best for Philippine, it is too heavy over 50 tons, the light MBT like VT5 is what really Philippine need, since light MBT have enough armor to deal with terrorists and can be used on rough terrain which heavy MBT wont able to used on.
yuxuan qi well it just a plan but maybe a MBT with 44MT could we need
围观喷子老外
围观中国人玻璃心
good pakistan buy this thanks 120
💪🤩🇨🇳💪😍🇵🇰
🇵🇰😘🇨🇳
gp-125 explanation excellent. . . repetition of sensor comments = usefull
Taiwan no.1!!!
Dvid Parker Thailand No Taiwan อีควายโง่นักมึง😬😬
Yes, m48 is the best tank in the world!!!
hhh
GOD BLESS TAIWAN get those provinces back which occupied by communist
this wud not fail in Russia like T90
Well hey at least they still got beef to beat to the T-72
Good use now, broke later
It cant peirce t 90 ms armor
I like the chassis and the Renk EMS 350 transmission, but nothing else. I'd much rather see Klimov GTD-1250 engine in it and just about anybody's elesis turret (other than Russian or Chinese):
Jeff Keith The Oplot is a better tank than this.
This tank has a more powerful engine, it is the original 1500hp engine used on the type-99A tank, but since this tank is lighter, it was reduced to 1200-1300hp to extended the lifespan, so if needed, this engine can output 1500hp without any changes.
중국전차는 96식이 탱크 바이애슬론 경기에서 보기륜 빠지는거 보고 이미 저건 글렀다고 생각했다
bang zi
And still completed the race
mbt of china no match 2 M1A2 of u.s.
Depends on which model of M1A2, but is definitely much more advanced than all models of Abrams before the A2 model.
Soon it will be tested on India😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Looks like a Leopard 2 copy.
😁😁😁😁😂😂😂 chaines toy 😘
arjunk
aarjunk
look at suspension, it is a body T-72 longer on one wheel, Chinese copy like a usual
EXplorer Chinese tanks are based in a Russian tanks of the t55 family, t72 came from the t55. T72 are all over the place.
The front of the turret also looks exactly like the Leo2
EXplorer you know that the Ussr and China worked togeher very closely, it is like the Leopard 2 nd the M1 Abrams, they also got out of a joint program so by your logic you could say, the M1 Abrams is just a Copy of the Leopard 2, they have a similar suspension !!11!
Good eye! T-72 is definitely the only tank that has a torque bar suspension!
Well the M1A DOES have a Rhienmetal (German) made barrel. I think it's the 120mm smoothbore correct?
looks to me like a m1 abrams
Yea it's a tank, so it must look like another tank. Cmom, did you pass high school?
Thailand is buying this? When? They already are into Ukraine for 200 T-84 Oplots, which I believe about 50 have been delivered? ASFAICT The the Oplot is far superior to anything Thailand immediate neighbors can field and superior to anything currently in SEA. Who is Thailand planing to defend against with such heavy tanks if indeed they are also buying the beast in the video above? Thailand has come a long way since the Stingrays and M60a3s they had for so long.
thediplomat.com/2016/05/thailand-to-buy-battle-tanks-from-china/
thediplomat.com/2017/02/more-china-tanks-for-thailand/
Ukraine in under civil war, and I believed those T-84 were used by their own army now lol
Yea also type into Google Starfighter and Germany. What I mean with that some corruption blackmail and other shanaigans could go on
@@possiblyadickhead6653 you know that and didnt get picked up by some men in uniform because the west have transparency unlike some totalitarian shithole
Chinese toy 😁
welded not good at all .
lol
Karrar from iran more better than all tanks
Persian Gulf IRAN as your wish
穆无王法 L
Maybe but Russia and Iran and iranian enemies said like that 🇮🇷✊🏼
穆无王法 L you wahching the Iranian Karrar tank at CZcams
What do you expect at made in china technology? Advance but low quality product thats why no one realy rely on their product.. maybe the guy explain it his arms made in china also😂😂😂 lol...
You are probably a Filipino, so you probably can't ever say anything good about China or the Chinese.
You criticize the Chinese government, the Chinese military, the Chinese industry, Chinese infrastructure, scientific and technological expertise, sporting achievements, the Chinese education, healthcare and housing sectors, etc etc as well as individual Chinese people.
But what exactly does the Philippines make? Compare Chinese cities with Filipino cities, Chinese schools, hospitals, airports, factories, housing projects, etc with those of the Philippines.
Your dislike of China and the Chinese is pathetic and laughable, like Bolivians or Haitians laughing and criticising Canada or the USA.
its made by lego pieces XD
In the end, it is "Made in China"
So is my computer and DJI drones, loving them.
and so is basically everything that you poor ass owns.
So please check where you computer and smartphone are made from
and you still buy them , maybe you are a bitch?
poor guy, who uses a computer for more than 5 years?
I don't mean to be rude but China wouldn't get that far without Soviet/Russian technology. The VT-4 is based on the Al-Khalid, which is pretty much based on the Type 90 family and these tanks are clearly based on the T-72. China simply copied the T-72's hull back then. The 125mm smoothbore gun, the ATGM with a range of 5km, the auto-loader...the Soviet Union had it first, decades ago! And Norinco has the guts to claim their VT-4 is better than Russia's new T-14? I highly doubt that the VT-4 will keep up with a T-90M.
You start with VT4 being a copy of T72, then go on and compare the VT4 to the T90MS, which is the latest and most powerful model of T90, and you said Norinco has the guts to claim VT4 is better than the T14 (which they didn't). You are confused, proof read before posting.
That thing is too small and too light!
This is a 52 tonnes tank, not that light when you consider the latest T90MS is only a 48 tonnes tank.
Thailand is buying this piece of crap? Please for the love of God do not buy this my Thai friends. Get the Leo2 series instead.
This thing will fall apart in Combat!! It will become a target practice for Russian, American and European tanks!!
quickzilver3333 Should have stuck with the oplot.
@@GBR9794 Challenger is a piece of crap. Still using rifled gun and with that weight can't go nowhere in Thailand. Not to mention the shiti maneuverability. Challenger is a fucking dinosaur, compared to Leopard and Abrams.
Yes, Thailand is buying this piece of crap and ditching the T84 oplot they originally selected, and this piece of crap is more expensive than the oplot. And even India is not stupid enough to buy over priced western tanks, fighter from France? okay, tanks from Europe? no thanks. Stop leaving comments without thinking with your tiny dick and get a live.
@@timothy1949 Nokia is losing ground all the time, but you are high up, are you still sleeping, baby
@@jaggeryang613 sorry but are you speaking english? i really dont get it sorry
Not impressed, no sure it can last even few months just running on road. why they have hire English speaking guy to advertise their fake stuff. All Bullshit.
No one has to impress you, because you have absolutely no concept anyway. A 52 tonnes tank with 125mm auto loading gun with variousprojectile and high penetrating APFSDS ammo, automatic gearing transmission, third generation CITV and battlefield management system would be considered an advanced tank by modern standard. But what should we expect from a guy who doesn't even know what Jane's is? Hire English speaking guy? you are out of your fucking mind.
Just chill out, chinese and their stuff have proven to be unreliable from time and time again.
@@dhirendralamba5119 are you Indian? What does your own country design and manufacture? Are your own country's products considered to be better than the Chinese (by the rest of the world)?
I love shameless chinese, you guys have been spying, copying and stealing American like crazy. There is nothing original about chinese products. I won’t even take any chinese items for free and continue to staunchly support made in India, made in Japan and made in USA. Just recently your rocket to moon which lifted with style but bite the dust like typical chinese. You guys should think about living a free life and not like slaves of thugs from Beijing. Remove your blinders and join Hong Kong movement, citizens of Hong Kong are self respecting, proud and courageous people and that is way whole world supporting them.
@@dhirendralamba5119 well the world doesn't stop simply because you cried
Iraq want this to replace their Abrams.
Chinese copy paste technology.
because China wants to catch up to India.