How Stan Efferding Grows HIS Legs!! (Max Effort/Hypertrophy)
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 02. 2022
- Stan Efferding was here at the compound and wanted to show you guys how he grows his quads!
Shop Our Site: elitefts.tiny.us/yt
Follow Us On IG: / elitefts
Follow Us On FB: / elitefts
Tweet Us At: / elitefts
Email Us At: customerservice@elitefts.net
#maxeffort #hypertrophy #elitefts - Zábava
This is the perfect type of vid to me as a novice/intermediate. It's gold, thanks guys. Great jokes too, I felt like a fly on the wall.
Stan asserting dominance by making the most ridiculous grunts
That man is earning some frequent flier miles with how long of a journey he takes with that range of motion goodness gracious.
Always enjoy hearing from Stan. Great video. The information communicated is invaluable. How to approach training, the decision making process, especially as one gets older.
These guys are awesome together! Great videos guys
great video. Loving how much content you guys are pumping out. Commenting for the algorithm because more people need to know about this channel.
Awesome content as usual!
"Don't do anything that hurts." I'm only 42, but my new mantra is "If it hurts, put a sleeve on it." LOL!
Thank you
i like those drab green plates 😍
Commenting for the algorithm
invaluable and great content. I appreciate that you guys work your butts off to provide the best information. Thank you very much
Good old Stan!
I would buy one of those hacks but I already bought it! It’s a great piece
Narrow hipped irish crew checking in. I'm average height (5'10) but my wrists and ankles are in the bottom tenth percentile for men too.
And that friction makes the eccentric easier, and the concentric harder, which is exactly what you don't want.
Who's the guy in the black t-shirt?
stan was incorrect about the angle. The Nebula Leg press Ronnie used was a 35 degree, they also made it in a 45 degree.
The painful sound of HIGH FRICTION FROM THAT MACHINE.
Same, still learning. Got a question got the universe, when you increase the weight of the bench or any exercise and you can't complete the final reps of the set should you decrease the weight or keep working until you can?
Drop the weight and hit the reps prescribed
@@eliteftsofficial when I complete the rep range I increase the weight afterwards which is when I run into this problem. Basically, I'm saying when is it a good time to overload into the next weight. Should I test? Increase to 85/75% and then hit it. Thanks for replying, this is good info
I dunno who started the "isolation's cause injury" and "only do compound movements" meme but they're probably injured right now.
I agree. I bought into that "only do compound movements" idea for years. I eventually realized some muscle groups were surprisingly weak (posterior chain, abs, upper back, rear delts, etc) and it was holding me back. I also had developed some compensation patterns due to my weaknesses, and eventually joint/tendon pains and minor injuries.
Eventually, I completely ditched that idea and started adding some isolation movements and more variations to my training program. I quickly became much stronger in general, more stable, have better technique and movement quality, and my body feels much better.
For example, my hamstrings were relatively weak when performing knee flexion exercises despite having a solid squat, deadlift, and RDL, and training those movements for years. I trained knee flexion directly with nordics, seated/lying hamstring curls, and GHR. Over a few months, my hamstring strength and size shot up amazingly fast. It completely changed how I moved, improved my speed/agility/general athleticism, completely removed knee pain, and improved both my squat and deadlift.
I realized after that experiment that using only the basic compound movements isn't enough if you want to be a complete athlete, and improve your weaknesses. The most efficient and effective way to improve your weaknesses is to attack them directly. There's really no reason not to utilize some isolation movements in your training program if you have access and time.
Hint: he gets vertical!
They call him "Protractor Stan" now, after that story.
So in short, hack squat machines build good legs.
leg press occurred after a 800 pound squat
You shoud edit all the parts out that Stan is not talking.
Do a super cut of Stan name dropping JON JONES.
EERRRA EPPAY!! ERRRA EPPAY!! EERRRA EPPAY!! ERRRA EPPAY!! And then you rest 2-3 minutes, got it.
why is there 3 plates on one side of the machine and two on the other?
It doesn't matter,load is equal
I have never found high reps on legs does anything...
Wait, how does he do 110 sessions a week?? Are they like 10 minute consultations?
I believe in a previous vid they talked about dealing with multiple clients at once. Assuming he works 6 days that's 18 a day. If that's 3 clients per hour long session it's 6 hours of work. Might be how he counts them.
He has small groups
@@finestjellybeansrawlol9486 ah ok that makes more sense
110 Personal Training sessions a week?! How?!
Stan Efferding is right there.. but lets keep talking about what we know & learn nothing from him😂
I don’t think Stan Efferding’s grown his legs in a long time
The guy after Stan talked way too much
If only that were true. If only he included his PED use as part of the equation.
All you’re doing here, again, is offering up a sample for people to be influenced by, while intentionally withholding the fact that without the magic elixir that operates behind the scenes of almost all your showcased lifters, any hopes of achieving similar gains remain an illusion. So really what’s the point?
Would a simple disclaimer not be appropriate?
And if you think I’m wrong, take a look at the rest of the comments from users unaware that without the drugs, these gains are impossible.
@@heloisemoise8179 surely your just talking about muscle size? Most of the video they are squatting just over there own weight (270pounds). Dont need PED to do that.
@@nephilimdj Thanks but read the title of video. It’s about “how.” Yet, as you say, they were using light weights. See what I mean?
Peds or not, it's the how that matters, silly.
@@HumanMechanism You do realise you just made my point for me 🤣