You're Going To Do What I tell You | This Cops Chose The Wrong Guy | Better Luck Next Time
Vložit
- čas přidán 23. 05. 2022
- #FirstAmendmentAudit #1stAmendmentAudit #4thAmendment #CopWatch #CopGetsOwned #Trespassing #Dismissed #CopDismissed #RookieCop #1aAudit #Cop #Police #CopsOwned #IDRefusal
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original Video: • 1st Amendment Audit, S...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY OF INCIDENT:
Always remember you have the same rights no matter who you deal with. Don't let them get over on you. Learn Your Rights!
Download my FREE eBook titled "Surviving The Police"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
FREE eBook: www.wethepeopleuniversity.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Register for my Course: www.wethepeopleuniversity.com...
Become an affiliate and get paid for simply telling people about my online video course titled "Surviving The Police". For every person you refer you will make up to $30. Visit us for more details: www.wethepeopleuniversity.com...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Violations that occurred: 4th Amendment
-----------‐‐------------------------------------------------------------
Channel Sponsorship: / @wethepeopleuniversity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second Channel: / @wtpuamendmentauditors...
Submit your videos here: abiyah@survivingthepolice.net
Sponsorship inquiries: abiyah@wethepeopleuniversity.com
Join my CZcams Channel and become a Sponsor for this channel:
/ @wethepeopleuniversity
Follow me on Instagram: @Abiyah_WTPU
GET YOUR WTPU MERCH TODAY!!! www.wtpumerch.store/
CashApp: $WTPU
Below is a link to my free eBook titled “Surviving The Police” get your copy and begin learning your basic rights and how to deal with the cops! FREE eBook: www.wethepeopleuniversity.com/
DISCLAIMER:
We The People University do not act as an attorney, nor do we provide legal advice. All information provided is general information and education for the purpose of assisting individuals in obtaining knowledge to help them be safe while they protect their rights as a law-abiding citizen. The information given within any of our lectures, courses printed materials, or social media sites is in no way designed to provide legal advice or create an attorney-client relationships. If you are arrested, detained, or placed in any situation where legal advice or representation is needed, we strongly encourage all of our viewers/students/followers to seek legal advice/representation from an attorney.
Abiyah Israel
abiyah@wethepeopleuniversity.com
www.wethepeopleuniversity.com - Zábava
![Police Grab The Wrong Black Man! This Man Knows His Rights [Lawsuit IS Coming]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/36JpIUnBonU/mqdefault.jpg)
![Police Grab The Wrong Black Man! This Man Knows His Rights [Lawsuit IS Coming]](/img/tr.png)
Cops still need to be educated!
The hard way
They should all be fired for being so friggen stupid!
How many lives did you screw up when you were a cop and what have you done to rectify it?
@@harrywinslow3946 He obviously missed yours! Shut your mouth!
what would fix the problem is if the government entity that pressed charges would have to pay for a defendant's defense if they are found not guilty.. it would completely eliminate malicious prosecution
A cop not knowing the ID laws is like a chef who can't boil water, a pilot who can't land a plane, a carpenter who cant read a tape measure, a truck driver who can't double clutch or a doctor who can't take vitals.
well yeah, except to say that there are no such thing as you latter five examples, whereas there are only rare example of cops knowing the law.
They know the ID laws...they were hoping the auditor didn't so that they could violate his rights or coerce him into waiving his rights. They know what they're saying...using words like "Need" and "Want". Those aren't demands; they're requests. They're corrupt pieces of shit. ALWAYS FILM THE POLICE!
@@twain3074 and cops are the only one in that group that is funded 100% through coercion.
No one would legitimately pay for that level of incompetence
Nurses usually take the vitals.... Just fyi
@@Adroit1911 But the point of a doctor not knowing how, would certainly raise an eyebrow. Apparently not so with cops.
She sounds so reasonable, calm, and articulate. If only she had a clue about her authority and people’s rights under the law. Embarrassment to the profession. I blame failure to train.
I'd honestly like to see more of her to get a better understanding of how she works, because as pointed in being a JUVINIEL facility it is possible her overreaching was because it could directly impact kids, as a number of ques she gave are similar to mothers and/or older sisters getting defensive for the sake of children.
Yep because then the Sarge gets it wrong too.
I wanna know were she learned that she has the right to identify anyone she wishes. Cuz we have a 4th amendment right. So I'd love to know were she learbed that. Cuz ik school didnt teach it
It's mainly greed imo, they are trained to make the most arrests etc to feed the privatized prison systems and make more money for the government and corporations. It's all about making more money and turning those gears to feed the machine. I bet the only time cops even see the constitution in school is when they are graduating and have to swear an oath to it.
The leave grey areas and also beat into you that you are the final authority in the academy.
I'm amazed at how having someone's ID you are able to determine what crime they committed. That makes no sense.
Why would that amaze you? That's how running the ID works. All offenses and warrants are attached to your ID.
Past crimes, he's talking about how having an ID wouldn't give anything that would help them tell if he had just committed something while there.
The double speak is incredible. They were literally breaking the law by detaining him
When are cops going to realise ignorance of the law is not a citizen problem
Perfect ,well said 👊👍
I mean it literally is the citizen's problem though because they have the power to make it the citizen's problem, which is the root of the issue. And it will continue to be the citizen's problem until police are incentivized not to behave this way, which can only be done by making it their problem when they violate people's rights. Neither a declaration nor a piece of paper somewhere stating something makes that thing reality, and thinking something SHOULD be a certain way doesn't mean that it IS.
when they lose QI
@@sugarnuts1304 The problem is that it IS an excuse under qualified immunity. They have an incentive to willfully avoid knowing the limits of their authority so they can claim it was just a mistake, and they meant well. It's a get out of jail free card but only for law enforcement people.
@Audiogeek ... well ... our founders figured it out
People who phone 911 over law abiding citizens should be held accountable. Grow some balls.
People have been trained like dogs . Say something, say something.
@haveAniLife Terrible take.
This auditor should most certainly be fitting for a 911 call. He is unusual, as well as suspicious by filming from a public street a Juvenile center. However, we all should know that this is legal, and the problem are the officers specifically the female which simply does not understand the law. There is no one to be held accountable accept the cops, i hope you understand this.
@HaveAniceLife
Right
Yeah , grab your bat and sort out attention seeking moronic losers hanging around your property.
How does having your ID help them know if you are committing a crime?!
It doesn't.
That is what I always ask. It doesn't say anything about the situation at hand.
First thought that came to mind. Like how can they ever pre-determine if this “reconnaissance” would be used for malicious purposes in the future?
Only if he has a criminal history or is on a terror watch list would his ID affect this detention in any way.
It doesn't. It let's them run you through their system to see if you have any warrants or criminal history. Just another way to get you under arrest.
Because they’re fishing and hope knowing your personal information leads to a crime.
They should tell these cops “I’m sorry that my constitutional rights are inconvenient to you. But if you knew the laws, you wouldn’t be wasting your time here.”
The Cops are ignorant.
Perfect
Perfect
Damn, I like that
This is a case, like many others, that could end before it begins. If the information the 911 call taker is accurate and the call taker knows the statute then no LEO's would need to be dispatched. That said you would need a Supervisor ( LEO )to issue final approval to send out the troops. That sounds easy enough to me.
Apparently police can determine someone’s intent just by looking at their drivers license.
It must be a special power they have.
Lol xD
Yes. Absolutely ridiculous. At best they can find that a person has outstanding warrants etc. but it doesn’t affect who is filming, observing, etc. in this case. It’s not a crime, it’s not illegal, and they said he wasn’t doing anything so they are UNLAWFULLY detaining him!
That always blows my mind. "I need to identify u in order to figure out if u are going to commit a crime." Like how the heck does that make sense to them
I have seen some auditors ask, "I've already told you what I'm doing, so how is looking at my ID going to help you learn what I'm doing here?"
You can tell she doesn't know ANY laws . She's parked in the middle of the street without her emergency lights on .
She just got pissed because he said no to her, so total power trip.
Ego problems.
When a supervisor seems more combative and even more unwilling to understand you can guarantee nothing will change at this department. Sad
Until the chief and all his or her dead wood goes with them. It is scandalous to charge the public for this kind of arrogant ignorance.
That's because the supervisor wants to get into lil miss control freaks pants LOL
The Sgt's entrance was just a show of bravado to try and spook the man and put up a hardnose no nonsense appearance for his underlings. Since he accomplished absolutely nothing his only out was to say they were sticking around to protect the children in the building. Would really like to know how long they actually stuck around after the guy left.
You damn right!
They always phrase it like getting an ID is going to verify anything, they just want to check for warrants, period.
Right? like giving up your ID is going to clear you of any suspicion. BS artists.
random - It's not like the ID states, "This guy is up to no good !!!" Warrants.
This is exactly what they want, as well as a record of what they consider "suspicious activity" with someone's identification attached to it.
just lookin for ways to hurt you...pigs
Exactly
4 cops for one man with a camera !!!! The usual police overkill.
You only have to ID in California if you're lawfully arrested.
The bottom line is they were simply trying to violate your rights and failed!!!!
They all stand around looking tough when there's no crime being committed. Real badasses 🙄🙄🙄
Tracy -
But speeders are dangerous, gangs have guns, rich people have attorneys.
So it is smart to simply pick on the poor people minding their own business.
But when there's a school involved pigs hide and wait for nappys and tissues and cower
@@seanhollway4774 I am waiting for all the details. But not from the cop PR dept.
Cuz they LIE.
When there is a real crime afoot then 50 have to turn up because they are cowards.
@@chrisbevis7725 Most important factor in Uvalde ? Officer safety.
"Sir, you are under suspicion for being dressed and acting all weird" She seriously just said that.
Yup so naked and normal would be ok?
Last time I was in downtown Portland, Or. there were lots of people dressed and acting all weird. That officer would have a tantrum there trying to get ID from them😂
I wonder how many people are in prisons all over the US for being “dressed and acting weird” ???
I mean seriously what a stupid bytch.
Could you imagine if this was a blue haired liberal doing this and the cop said he was suspicious for looking weird. The press would be all over it. Hypocrisy at its finest.
You just made a good statement about all Blu haired leftist liberals and trannies.
A throw back to Nazi Germany where you had to give your papers...
And,stalinist Russia.
@@beaupierrebondurant5651 modern day Russia, North Korea, Belarus etc.
Cops get their "legal" training from other cops, when they should be getting it from lawyers. They have no idea how wrong they are.
They need to read and study each respective country's Constitution.
@@WilliamOfficeSupply9832 US cops only serve in one country and they don't konw the Constitution of their own country, which is the sad point. Why you think US cops, who are wholly ignorant of the US Constitution should be wholly versed in other countries' constitutions, is wholly beyond me. Wholly.
When you need help for a real crime, they are no where to be found.
Because they are with 5 cars arguing with a guy filming from the sidewalk
@@tiloalo Same police departments that argue they can't do their demanding jobs due to a lack of resources. I just found 4 cops doing nothing to solve crime.
Yep! And it seems they spend most of their time escalating nothing into something just to aggravate the people, while real criminals are getting away with their crimes.
How does ID'ing somebody determine whether they're being "malicious" or not?! He's already stated why he's there.
They are fishing for ID to check for warrants and keep a record of the person for suspicious activity.
I missed that part why was he there
They run you for warrants that’s all it is. And you don’t have ID without a crime being committed. 🖕🖕🖕
He gave the female cop a full account of his activities; which he did not need to. She ignored him and repeated her unlawful demands. People who use their mouth over their ears should never be a cop and this one is never right in the head imo.
I tell cops "I'm not ALLOWED to give my ID."
"Why not?" they usually ask with a confused smirk.
"Well, sir, my God instructs me to honor my father and mother, and my parents have instructed me to stand up for my constitutional rights."
❤❤❤
They know the law, they're just counting on us not knowing it and caving in to the pressure.
When they "detain" you and tell you they are "investigating", tell them you're NOT going to help them with their investigation, and if they have more questions to talk to your lawyer. And then STAY QUIET. Any time a "supervisor" shows up and repeats nonsense, he should immediately be reduced in rank by his chief.
OH NO, His azz should FIRED ON THE SPOT!! How about a tree surgeon shows up at your house and suggest dropping the tree across the house so that the limbs with be closer to the chipper. THEN his STUPIDVISOR shows up and agrees? You still going to hire that company? I think NOT!
Guys I believe this can be a lawsuit against his rights
So there for see them and get them to los there jobs due to ignorant ego
@@gabriellobo25 NOPE, The union is NOT HAVINT IT. NOW if a GOOD COP stops a bad one from let's say choking a handcuffed suspect, That will be a FORMER COP.
@@gabriellobo25 It "COULD" be, but the violation was not EGREGIOUS
The narcissistic, egotistical, arrogant, entitled attitude of police officers is extremely vexing to me. It legitimately crawls my skin!
Just really bad actors 🤡
It’s so out of control all across the country. It’s time to start all over and make sure that any police that violate our rights are terminated immediately.
I concur with you!
He was too nice responding to them too and he talked too much. Not sure if I'd do the same.
Cockroaches in my opinion
It's my contention that they are not simply ignoring the law but that they are willfully ignoring the law to cover their asses and be able to claim qualified immunity. Full stop
Love your channel.
And yes, these auditors like this calm collective man are making changes.
If they forced him by arresting him then he took it to court and cost them money, they would start being forced to watch how they do stuff after costing the depart bad reputation enough time's. If we didn't do this they would over step even more
I love how he’s so concerned about the children that have been convicted of crimes. Crimes which they will use against them for the rest of their lives because they have a “criminal record“. These guys are so disgusting and hypocritical.
Copsplaining is not only hypocritical it's baffling and hilarious at the same time!🤣 😂 😆 The authoritarian TYRANTS are a joke! Be careful they will play a life altering joke on you. 🤔
It's is so sad that all this is necessary...sad...
They always act like cops are always being surveiled and targeted, They should just admit that they're stupid and paranoid
Was going to comment this but you beat me too it
Not to mention that the kids are safely secured behind bars and cops with assault rifles. Smh such idiots these people in blue.
They still believe they can find out if you've committed or are about to commit a crime by looking at your ID. Are they really this stupid, or do they believe we are?
It's just fishing for information to a) check your background and b) keep a record of your activities when involved with LE.
They absolutely know checking your ID will not further the current investigation but potentially further a different one.
both
3rd option .) They are integrated into a corrupt police force where they not only don't receive the adequate education needed on the law but also unfortunately get caught in the web of having to obey their "superiors," no matter how ridiculous the command is. It's a sad, sad world we live in.
Jester, both!
They put on that uniform and many of them become the Gestapo and have no respect or understanding of the law, the constitution or the bill of rights that gives this man the Holy Trinity of protection.
"No officer, you do not have the right to detain me unless you have reasonable grounds to suspect I committed a crime. You are illegally detaining me."
A call for service doesn’t mean you have to assist them in their investigation. What a bunch of clowns.
It takes the first cop 18 seconds to tell her first lie. Lying by omission is one of their favorites.
Wow, you can tell the ignorance starts at the top. That whole department needs to be retrained on the Law, and Constitutional Rights ASAP.
You could train them till the cows come home and they would still demand ID!!
Stupid cop 1,2,3,and 4. 👌
Instead of walking in shame, they stood in submission.
The supervisor needs to be demoted and the female cop needs to be retrained along with the supervisor. Even the detainment is unlawful. If they make an arrest they will lose qualified immunity.
And this drug out for awhile. Good thing the last guy realized our guy wasn't being cowed! Very Kareny of the 9-1-1 caller.
You cannot re-train stupid or tyrant!
Imagine 4 cops showing up for a guy with a camera and he knows more about the law than them…
Happens almost every day
More than the four of them combined.
@@nathanmorrow6981 More than 4 combined, Couldn't achieve a triple digit IQ
The guy with the camera already showing quite an imagination so I guess we don’t to imagine that. 🤪
In 2023 its BUSINESS AS USUAL FOR badged thieves ,jails are full of victimless crime people making products for judges pigs and others to profit ..
You really seem like you were a good officer.. I'm so sad that departments are so corrupt we can't keep good officers because of the bad
Thank you for the education
This is the first video I’ve seen where the cops didn’t overreact & actually handled the situation properly. 99% of the time their ego gets bruised & they get violent. They were actually pretty professional. I’m shocked
These fools just don't get it and probably never will. They think they can make up laws
Because they can. Not like they ever get in trouble for it
And the fact that they think that makes me believe that they have a corrupt judiciary in that town.
Exactly 💯
These cops are idiots!
They always want to charge you with "resisting arrest" and "obstruction of justice" or "failure to ID" but what did they do to get those charges to begin with because they weren't charged with anything else but those things.
pretty sure tyranny is a worse charge,.. they all could move up in the ranks just by turning in their own! but yea we know blue line gang.
Secondary offenses, like you said. Also, once they've both cited detainment for "being weird", I kinda laughed a bit.
Because they’re allowed to make up crap and charge whatever they want to “make something stick”. It’s bull hockey and it needs to stop.
That is a bit too hard for a person who is trained to pull guns, shoot to kill, get a gang, swing the club and handcuff before assaulting to understand. Laws? They don't have time for laws.
Being arrested for failure to identify says to me that we already have totalitarian police states both here in the UK and the US
"If there was probable cause, you'd be in handcuffs already."
Great! You can have my ID once you put me in handcuffs and take it from me.🤷♂️
SGT came up very bold and started his investigation without even knowing what the call was for. That's a very danger for the community to be having such a clueless officer.
How does ID-ing someone determine if a crime has been committed? And what was said crime, even though they said no crime had been committed? You don't detain someone and then see if you can make up a crime. This is crazy!
They're saying there is no crime, but IDing will solve the question of guilt???!!! Come on man, lol, just say you're checking for warrants. It's the truth.
@@gabehayes1833 Exactly!
Not until the cops are held personally liable this sort of thing will continue.
Somebody needs to get rid of the rotten apples, the ignorant, the violent and any cop that thinks he or she can abuse innocent people or even guilty ones for that matter. The police are not judge, jury or executioner.
Exactly 💯
That first cop was blissfully ignorant. How that sargeant passed the test is a head scratcher.
"When we detain somebody, at that point we do not know whether or not a crime has been committed or not yet. ... If no crime has been committed, there's no probable cause and that person is free to go." ... What absolute gibberish. She already said she had no probable cause. At that point, the "detention" should end.
How embarrassing that the woman officer doesn’t even know the very basics of the law she is there to uphold, but Sergeant Lara’s approach was condescending and hostile and he is just as dumb as the woman officer. Respect to the auditor who wasn’t prepared to give his details and stood his ground.
The guy standing there video taping the incident seems like he was kind of creepy
Nasty Nathaniel. Check him out.
I'm shocked they didn't tackle him and arrest him.
The more condescending a person is, the less intelligent he is. He has an inflated opinion of his intelligence and doesn't realize that others are, in fact, smarter than he is.
She will get promoted to sgt the "old fashioned way"
Reconnaissance is not a crime.
California is not a stop and Identify state. He hasn't committed crime and he is on a public sidewalk.
These ppl and cops are too stupid to realize you can get those images from fucking Google maps 😒
I was thinking the same thing. Gathering information is completely harmless... there's simply no element of crime.
What do you think stop and ID means? Stop falling for that nonsense..
Supervisor came up disrespectfully and assumed the worst right from the start. He failed even before you stated your case!!
their body language gave them away. they knew they couldn't force him to ID so they looked away and at the ground. shuffled their feet like school kids being scolded at recess. hilarious
That first cop on scene sounded absolutely foolish to not know the laws. She is someone who probably lies so many times in the past that she actually believe that she was right and was only doing her job as the judge and jury. The Sargent should be demoted before the town gets sued for his lack of knowledge.
Yes she was foolish
Cops hate to admit when they are wrong. So they try to deflate from the truth and come up with stupid reasons to justify their lack of knowledge..
"We don't have probable cause at this point, the reason we detain people is to investigate something to see whether a crime has been committed."
This sounds to me like you're Guilty until proven innocent... How on earth did this lady get a badge?!?
It's too graphic and revealing for younger CZcams watchers. Lol
She's working her way up that blue line, though.
it makes perfect sense! 🙄
Jay G. Can you imagine the bottom of the barrel applicants they must have received the year she applied? EEsh.
@@TheLegenDacster Bingo. Police Departments across the nation have lowered their hiring standards.
The chief gave it to her, This chief needs to be fired
I feel safer having 4 officers spend time watching him video while crime rampages down town.
That sgt.sounds like hes an affirmative action hire.
That's Sergeant is the biggest fool of them all.
What I can never understand is how knowing someone's identity will tell them what you are up to. Even if you had a criminal background vandalizing juvenile facilities they still couldn't stop you from filming from a public place. It's totally bogus. Paperz Pleaze!!
Excellent point.
unfortunately if one had a criminal background vandalizing juvenile facilities. they would arrest one for intent to commit a crime
@@dustinchristiansen3381 I thought priors which a person has already been charged convicted and punished, could not be used against you as probable cause
They're looking for warrants.
Go to court and see how a judge treats your past. Million percent there using it against you and cops know the law there thinking everyone else is stupid and do what that say
How is getting his identification going to tell them if a crime is about to be committed? Good Lord.
So the sargent was BS’ing the auditor about ID’ing him otherwise the auditor would have been arrested for failing to ID. You showed great courage to call the sargent’s bluff.
Well done.
He showed he knew the law and his rights under the law.
he should of said arrest me because am not showing you my ID worth over $40000 if the low IQ ,born cowards ,anti-American pigs did arrested him
Sarge was very carefully covering for her, but did actually know the laws involved. He stepped a very precarious line, but made sure he himself, stayed on the correct side.
More audits are needed in this area. They still believe they can do whatever they want.
Exactly 💯
I can never be a cop. I would have tased the guy
Oh yes. Born and raised in Santa Barbara County and 100% agree.
"Snoop around," in broad daylight? with two cameras? dressed in camo (ironically, the most conspicuous public clothing)?
This dude must be the WORST snooper ever!😂😂😂
Mr. Israel, you're doing a fantastic job. Keep it up. I have 100% respect and admiration for law enforcement in general and down right disgust for Law Enforcement who violate their oath and peoples' rights.
When the sarge realised that the call actually came from a passing motorist, he knew he had no case. He was trying it on when he said the call came from the staff in the building. Shame that the police do such things.
I get so fed up with officers that want to argue with citizens and escalate because the citizen is right. These officers know the law they just try the intimidation tactics to get people to comply with their demands and not the LAW!
No, most pigs are idiots that don't know basic laws.
She's talking and trying to convince herself that she knows she messed up but she's trying to get her a** out of it in a legal way. Basically copsplaining the whole thing.
How does a whole department not know how the law works
She lied within 15 seconds I would turn around walk 30 feet away from her and just ignore her you can tell that she’s just not gonna get this. She looks so disinterested that I think she knew what your answer was going to be but it almost sounds like she’s been coached to conduct yourself in that manner and she knows this type of policing no longer works
But it’s all about the safety of the children? Lol
Yeah it did seem like she was just going through the motions.
@@gregkasza1925 Oh yeah every loser hides behind the safety of the children they think that’s the argument at all al them to penetrate into your life
I would not leave her to watch my goldfish.
All they’re trying to do is scare the person stopped into id’ing, hoping he doesn’t know his rights. They know damn well that they’re not entitled to his ID. Paid liars is all they are…
He's too polite. He certainly needs to at least make the statement that the detention is illegal. he should make a complaint too. The way he left it, these cops still think they are right.
When cops do this, they should have to pay out of pocket. Make them KNOW THE LAW!!!
“I am detaining you to find out who you are” When did they stop being law enforcement and become the figure out who you are police?
The first female officer on the scene leaves her VEHICLE blocking one lane on a two lane street WITHOUT LIGHTS ACTIVATED!
“Yes Sir you’re right, you can film from a public sidewalk & it’s perfectly LEGAL, you do not have to show ID but…I’m an officer & you have to ID! & yes you’re also ILLEGALLY detained. I’m NOT accusing you of a crime, I also ADMITTED that you’re NOT committing a crime but you have to stay here until I’m done f@cking around with you”!! Sounds about right!! 🤦🏾♀️🤷🏾♀️
Why do they always say we don’t know what you’re doing here, right after you tell them exactly what you’re doing there. 😂
I hate when police officers say they have "the right" to detain/ID people. Uh.... police have the same rights as everyone else, and no more. What they do in the course of their official duties are their responsibilities. Not their rights! Any time they use powers under color of law, they must follow the law. These are not rights. They are privileges afforded to them by virtue of their official position.
Well stated, KC.
Just like the military the moment you sign your name on the dotted line you are no longer a person but a utility you no longer have rights and must abide
...
Government has no rights, only powers - which we delegate to them for our benefit.
It is unconstitutional - a violation of our ‘rights’ for them to operate outside the powers which we delegate to them.
@@YouFallenforit Wrong. You still have rights when you are in the military. How in hell do you think US military do not have rights?
@@basanistes359 when you sign up and take the oath military members take for your duration in the military you surrender some not all but some of your rights as once you are in the Military you don't just have the right to come and go however you please because you are always on duty even when taking leave you can still have that leave canceled and be called back if you are supposed to be at work and just decide to call out if it is a valid reason sure but if it is I just don't feel like going in today it's awol absent with out leave and is a crime you can be arrested for likewise if you are a civilian and call out to work you could be docked pay or even fired but not arrested. If you are told to do something you don't want to do like go to basic training for several weeks or told to step into a area without a gas mask on where tear gas is released you don't have the right to just not do it because it is a legal order from a higher ranking individual. These are some examples of rights you give up in the military. Again not fussing at you just describing how in the military you do have to give up some of your rights and have others limited and restricted if you will.
I will never understand how showing my ID will make me "good to go". Especially when, in this vid , the cops continue to say that no crime has been committed...blows my mind
K, read my 1st 5 comments, every time she said that, i ssked the same thing,
@@shivasirons6159 I'll never understand. I mean I know that they're looking for warrants, or if you're on probation or something. But how the heck is my ID going to make me "good to go"... Put me in a system? Smh.
They want to put you on record in case something bad happens there in the future you would be a suspect. Unfortunately for them we don't have to help their future investigations of us either.
They'd have charged him, without cameras - he'd have to take a plea deal
Their body cams are not submitted as evidence if it doesn't support their allegations. He's kind of covered so long as prosecutor doesn't block the video from being shown.
You take plea deals because they throw so many charges on you, that risking it just isn't worth it. From my POV, they are creating criminals. I know I am significantly more 'criminal' than before interactions with police. No thug could ever teach me like police can, because you can hit thugs back. Police will just charge you more. Truly, bullies.
Lazy policing picking low hanging fruit mind set.....the clearance of crime rates is reflective of this style of policing. You don't have the right to detain people then find a crime to fit. All the bullshit lies this officer and her charge is staggering.
They know! They have the right to ASK. Doesn’t mean you are required to answer.
Abiyah, I so appreciate your channel!
The more she talks the deeper she’s digging herself. I find it appalling the Sargent is letting this clueless woman be in control of this situation. I love at the end he says the main concern is the kids. Obviously it’s not this auditors rights because by standing around watching him is a intimidation tactic.
No offense to women and the men are just about as bad but if you want the situation to escalate send in a big mouth woman it only makes things worse
@@gregreeves7696 Hi. Coming from an informed an professional perspective: Here in the Dis-United Kingdom, it is very often the opposite. Female officers can often talk down a belligerent suspect/detainee and in comes a male colleague, all macho, authoritarian and full of bravado, and it fires off again.
That simply is because this absolutely completely useless pos 3 striper doesn't know anything about the law himself either, just like the other 99.9% of these uniformed corrupt criminals.
The first tell tale sign of a corruptive police department is the lack of body cameras
They're so confident in their ignorance. Even though he just learned the law he will do t again and the victim will not know his rights. That's what they count on.
12 minutes in, the walk of shame started and the Sargeant states kids are thier main concern. Lmao, money is your main concern and power.
"When we detain someone we do not know if a crime has been committed"
It's insane how many times she says this and doesn't understand that that's not legal...
Nor does it make any sense.
She even stated that it's not PROBABLE CAUSE!!!
and her brain dead sergeant goes along with it.
Not to mention just PLAIN STUPID
You understand that the repeat was an edit to the video right?
Now to sum this up, if the Sargent investigated when he first arrived they wouldn’t have gone back and forth. He never bothered to find out where he was standing or recording from, never learned if he trespassed or not, instead he immediately backs up the officer and her unlawful orders. All of the officers get an F- for not knowing the law and for unlawful detainment.
*sergeant
But the point here is, how can they "investigate" a non crime? Basically, they cant. They can only conduct enquiries when there is no RAS of a crime, to try to find RAS of a crime. They ALWAYS use the investigation bullshit to make things sound more serious to try and justify their violations of not only constitutional rights, but protected human rights
@@MrBeevee5 who cares
@@daveheesen9174 I'm aware that dumb people don't. You should apply to be a cop, the IQ level is about right.
@@rjamaio Ooooooo. What a hotshot we got here. LOL.
The fact that ive never been arrested, have no drug or alcohol history, and active secret clearance but despise the blue speaks volumes. When he said they are here to protect kids you should have said " you mean the way you protected them at Uvalde?"
I was laughing so hard while that lady cop was explaining herself and trying to say why it's okay for them to ID/detain this guy.
Just pure ignorant - I would bet money she was bottom of her class at school. To me she has special educational needs that are not suitable for her to be a cop. She is never in a million days the full ticket imo. As for the sergeant you could write an entire book on what he is lacking.
How is them getting his ID tell them if he's committing a crime?
At this point it's just becoming embarrassing, all these videos need to be part of police training
Probably a hundred videos out there where cops admit they watch these videos. Unfortunately their low IQ doesn't allow them to process this information into reality. They stay trapped in their imaginary hero world. Such as their someone has malicious purposes and is videoing them blah blah, I would challenge her to prove that story.
Nope...a Rico case against unlawful actions under color of law.
They literally do not care. They see us all as potential criminals. "Protect and serve" ....sure.
Can’t believe that one guy called 911 over this. What an absolute clown
She definitely was a know it all, teachers pet in school. She was so convinced that she knew the law and was frustrated when they finally realized they couldn’t force to ID him without a lawsuit
She was definitely not teachers pet she was probably bottom of the class - and it is impossible to think of the woman as even having basic common sense. Becoming a cop must be some kind of payback on society because of her own failings.
Teachers’ pets go to college. That cunt hangs around a parking lot demanding respect for her “authoritah” like the rest of the inept in Uvalde.
The Sargent was intentionally lying. He knew the law concerning ID. If he really thought this man was legally obligated to ID, he would have arrested him. Instead, he let him go without IDing once the man drew the line that he was not going to ID.It's sickening that a police officer in a leadership position, someone we are supposed to be able to trust, chronically lies and deceives the public he is entrusted to serve
Perfectly said.
lying at anytime from cops should be considered a type of perjury ! They take those same lies to court from the street !!
The Sargent walked up hostile when he saw the guy was recording everything.
He just hopes to one day get that useless female cops pussy by agreeing with her. He knew she was wrong 100%
@@dseason7216 It is not perjury because it is LEGAL for them to lie. It is illegal for US citizens to lie to them because they are under their JURISDICTION and therefore must follow their corporate policies which probably states somewhere the "PERSON" cannot lie to LEO. If you are an America National or State National or a non-US citizen you are not under their jurisdiction and you can lie if you want. They are a corporation and you are a flesh/blood living soul which has a higher authority than a legal fiction/corp.
They always say that people videotape for malicious purposes. In what part in the USA has a police department has been attacked? It is pure lies or paranoia.
Nothing butt hurts a cop more than refusing an illegal request for ID.
She has it backwards, you first need a crime to investigate a crime.
This is the first time I've ever heard them openly say they can detain and identify a person who they admit they have no probable cause to suspect of a crime. The officer and the supervisor both clearly stated no crime had been committed and they had no probable cause to believe there was a crime but they needed to detain and identify him to conduct an investigation to see if they could find probable cause. This takes it to a whole new level of stupidity. After that I was actually kind of hoping they would force the issue and arrest the guy. His attorney would have probably sent them thank you cards for handing them such a slam dunk win.
They throw as much shit on the wall, and see what sticks.
Exactly. But instead of getting an attorney who is part of the system, learn how to sue yourself and JUST DO IT? Title 18 Section 241- Conspiracy against rights & 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law. Build up that retirement nest egg.
Shocking that they have such ignorance of the law, and arrogance at the same time
I love the way these tyrants always try to bend the law, to attempt and violate someone’s rights! She is saying that no crime was committed, and still trying to get his ID. Absolute tyrants.
I don't believe they care about, "kids" and probably lied to them too. The Sargent should be demoted or fired. End qualified immunity now!
Sue for every second she “detained”’ you
Jamesy: Most Courts would cite minor inconvenience if a short period according to BAY AREA TRANSPARENCY
It would have been tempting to stand there for the next 8hrs