What does the Bible say about divorce and remarriage?
Vložit
- čas přidán 24. 11. 2019
- Watch more episodes of Honest Answers here: • Honest Answers
"What does the Bible say about divorce and remarriage?"
Dr. Thomas Schreiner answers in Honest Answers | Episode 82
To find out the answer to next episode's question, don't forget to SUBSCRIBE:
czcams.com/users/SouthernSemi...
To learn more about studying with a Southern Seminary or Boyce College professor, go to:
www.sbts.edu
www.boycecollege.com
It’s very encouraging to see the comments here knowing how many Christians are NOT willing to compromise the truth even when pastors are saying it’s ok.
It is considered the last resort... like mercy killing on some instances...
Sadly, many are not only allowing it, but in some cases encouraging it, and practicing it! It's as if they put their own desires ahead of the one they claim to represent, then have to cover their guilt by claiming it's ok for their congregants! Misery loves company, birds of a feather, sinner trying to hide among sinners...
The Bible gives two clear grounds for divorce: (1) sexual immorality (Matthew 5:32; 19:9) and (2) abandonment by an unbeliever (1 Corinthians 7:15). Read your book
@@user-pd9ju5dk5s You are wrong. God did not create divorce, this was created by Moses because of the hardness of man’s heart. The Bible clearly says that God HATES divorce so why do you think God would allow several options for something He hates and never meant for us?
@@Urbankungfu61 Read the book
A wife must not leave her husband. But if she does leave him, let her remain single or else be reconciled to him. And the husband must not leave his wife.
1 Corinthians 7:10-11 NLT
Daniel- good verse but I'd stay away from the Nlt and Niv. Not accurate translations as they both WRONGLY translate adultery instead of Fornication in Matthew 19:9 and 5:32 which has led to the skyrocket in divorce in the "Church" today since the 60's. Stick with the King James version or other Bibles printed pre 1900
@@philarevolutionarywarriorp8295 evidently this was the result of Erasmus and his translation, which was said to have been promoted, by Luther....
@@philipbuckley759 Good point. I reccomend the book "Except for Fornication" by Dan Jennings. (You can also watch a 20 minute CZcams video synopsis of the book by Jennings himself) He confirms your point while explaining how almost all early church fathers/leaders read the Word as Fornication, NOT adultery as correctly translated from the original Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek from AD 70 right up to the 1500's.
@@philarevolutionarywarriorp8295 thank you.....will check it out....
@Serhiy Semeniuk if that were true we would be....married, to everyone that we had sex with....
I will not say the last words what you say that Jesus said it is okay to get divorce and remarry, those are your words, let's be honest Bible is very clear about widows that can remarry but you will never find verse that is clear that you can remarry after you get divorce. I stick to the second opinion the divorced person must stay alone or reconcile to the spouse.
Thomas I agree to you brother!
I don't think it's an opinion, it's the word of God. Anyone who says otherwise is in conflict not with man but with God himself.
Yes!!!
@@jtfike maybe you aught to actually READ the bible before you talk about it. Your comment screams ignorance of the scriptures. Try reading the bible a couple more times..... none of what you said has any basis in reality.... Maybe you are just reading a bad bible and I being too harsh??? Get A kjv and check your verses.
Jeff where does Jesus say there's only one commandment? Here he mentions at least two "Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets." He also says "If you love me, you will keep my commandments" (plural)
This topic is so confusing and hurtful in many ways. I’m not going to go into too many details, but I’ve always felt like I was meant to be a wife. I wasn’t near a believer ( meaning lack of knowledge of a relationship with Jesus) when I married terribly young. It ended due to abuse and infidelity. Now that I have a relationship with Jesus, I’ve come to what it means to be married until death parts you. It is a hard pill to swallow especially marrying out of ignorance. I’ve cried so much about this. People say be strong, but most are happily married believers who made it. Many don’t understand being young with no prospects of being able to remarry. Then mixed messages on what’s allowed. It css as n drive you crazy.
@Marcella Crier Please do not fall for the lies that are being told one scripture at a time. The Bible was never meant to be chipped apart and put back together like a jigsaw puzzle...one quote from here, one quote from there, one quote from this apostle, etc., it was meant to be read as a whole. This is why there are mixed messages and guess who is providing those mixed messages? Yep, you are right. Satan wants people to doubt themselves, live in fear and listen to false "believers" who quote the Bible. These "believers" are deceivers when they are trying to convince you that you are a sinner and should be ashamed and fearful. God does not want you to live in fear. 1 Corinthians 15 "But if the unbeliever leaves, let it be so. The brother or the sister is not bound in such circumstances; God has called us to live in peace." Read the entire chapter and in it you will see that your marriage was not a gift from God and you should find another husband and live in peace. You CAN REMARRY - it is not a sin.
Hey, we have a forgiving GOD. My situation is very similar to yours and I was married to an unbeliever. He had a relationship with another woman and made her pregnant so in Gods eyes that’s broke the bond. We are now divorced. I can’t see how God wouldn’t want me to remain unmarried when the fault is with my ex husband... it doesn’t make any sense. I’ve taken this to God. Asked for repentance on that marriage and I feel that I can get remarried to a Christian, I’m waiting on God for that and really believe it will happen. A lot of people on here have opinions, they haven’t been married or even divorced. So it’s a topic they can’t fully be 100% making accusations at when they have never gone through it. We all have a personal relationship with the LORD. Pray and fast on the matter. GOD forgives, we are a new creation.
Hope this helps you settle your mind. There’s a lot of negative comments and hate on here. It’s a very sensitive topic and some of my “ brothers and sisters” make you feel ashamed and not worthy because of divorce. God bless.
@@racyt5683
It is wicked and evil to remarry whilst the first spouse is alive. Take not notice of such a heresy....
Romans 7:3
"The woman that hath a husband is bound by law to the husband while he liveth; but if the husband die, she is discharged from the law of the husband.
3 So then if, while the husband liveth, she be joined to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if the husband die, she is free from the law, so that she is no adulteress, though she be joined to another man.
Romans 7:2-3 (ASV)
It is wicked and evil to remarry whilst the first spouse is alive. Take no notice of such a heresy....encouraging you to remarry and fall into grievous sin.
Romans 7:3
"The woman that hath a husband is bound by law to the husband while he liveth; but if the husband die, she is discharged from the law of the husband.
3 So then if, while the husband liveth, she be joined to another man, she shall be called an adulteress:
but if the husband die, she is free from the law, so that she is no adulteress, though she be joined to another man.
Romans 7:2-3 (ASV)
Pray. The LORD knows your heart and situation. Trust Him to lead and guide you. God bless 🙏
Romans 7 seems pretty clear and to the point, and the funny thing is that he didn't "forget" to mention it.
The big problem for these seminarians today is trying to understand God through the lens of modern culture.
yes !!!
Literally Jesus, “Because of the hardness of your hearts Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. I say to you, whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery.”
Ya it’s funny because you actually read Bible never teaches death ends marriage ether which is why Jesus said not to remarry
@@TechCody113 What do you think Paul meant here?
A wife is bound to her husband as long as he lives. But if her husband dies, she is free to be married to whom she wishes, only in the Lord. (1 Corinthians 7:39, ESV)
@@michaelmcevoy9278 you have to understand Paul and mosses made laws for that stuff and isn’t in contact now, so he was talking about it under law of Moses
I have wondered many times if Jesus meant "whoever divorces AND then gets married again after that, at some point in time" or whether he meant "whoever gets divorced to remarry someone else/ or to replace current spouse" because back in exodus, from my understanding, the men were divorcing their wives many times with the intention to find a different one or to replace the current one?
I can’t imagine Jesus requiring a wife to stay with someone that is putting her life in danger. Or perhaps the kids lives in danger. Wouldn’t this be applied common sense based on principles?
"Till Death Do Us Part" is a vow before God not only to your wife or husband
Most would agree that the forsaking all others was a clause that if broken would be cause for divorce... As Jesus gave in Matthew 19:9
YES NOT DIVORCE DO US PART.... PERIOD.....
@@maunder01 where do the scriptures refer to what breaks one-flesh other than death?
@@ajlouviere202 an unbeliever or someone who turns away from Christ is DEAD also....
Where does those vows during marriage comes from? Bible or where? Making of vows when people get married is it biblical?
My wife cheated on me. After a few years she decided she wanted a divorce. I could not stop her. I tried. Her Free Will. I am now remarried and God has given me back everything I lost and more. She is not allowed to remarry. I am.
Mathew 19:9 “And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery."”
Matthew 19:9 ESV
Jesus makes a clear statement that adultery is the result of a divorce, and subsequent remarriage, not the cause. In fact, Jesus never lists any specific cause for divorce, and neither does the Old Testament, but only that "It hath been said" that in order to divorce let him give her a certificate of divorce (which the Pharisees already stated was for any reason), and then Jesus states the phrase: "except it be for fornication", which clearly means it was an exception to giving a certificate of divorce for any cause. The clear reason that you could not issue a certificate of divorce for her to become another man's wife is seen in Deuteronomy 22:13-21;23-24. A betrothed wife caught having committed fornication was stoned to death, not given a certificate of divorce in accordance with Deuteronomy 24:1-4 (Moses's precept of divorce and remarriage).
Understand the context and meaning of Jesus's words in these verses:
In Matthew 19:3 the Pharisees asked Jesus a question according to the law in Deuteronomy 24:1-4 about divorce for any cause.
In Matthew 19:4-6 we see Jesus reply by reciting the one-flesh covenant of marriage (God's law of marriage) in Genesis 2:23-24.
In Matthew 19:7-8 we see Jesus giving the Pharisees the reason that Moses wrote the precept (Deuteronomy 24:1-4), which was because of the hardness of the hearts of the Jews of the exodus (the wicked generation kept out of the promised land) against their wives.
In Matthew 19:9 Jesus affirms that the law in Deuteronomy 24:1-4 was for any reason "except for fornication" (Deuteronomy 22:13-21; 23-24) because it was unlawful to give a woman, guilty of a sexual offense, a certificate of divorce in order to become another man's wife. She was stoned to death, which freed the husband from the betrothal in order to seek another wife. However we see this is not a possibility, under the Law of Moses, which now causes the husband to commit adultery by marrying another woman.
Keep in mind that Mark 10:1-12 is the same biblical account as Matthew 19:1-12, but does not have a cause for fornication. The reason for this is because this account was written and given to the Gentiles who had no knowledge of the Law of Moses in Deuteronomy 22:13-21; 23-24.
Thanks for sharing that. I don't know all of the details of your situation and as such, I cannot make conclusions. However, based on what you have said, once she committed adultery, your marriage would have been over (you became no longer one). That would allow you to have a divorce and even remarry someone else. And you are correct, it would be inappropriate for her to remarry or for someone else to marry her.
@@shadowmist1246 the divorce and remarriage for adultery doctrine is based solely on the supposed guilt of the wife in Matthew 5:32 and 19:9. However, the wife, in the above scriptures, is clearly not guilty of fornication because the Jews (that Jesus was speaking to) were still living under the law, and if fornication was discovered, there was a moral obligation to report the offender according to Deuteronomy 22:13-24. The wife, who would have been found guilty of fornication, was subsequently stoned to death, according to the law, which had still governed the Jews up until Christ's death on the cross. The same for a woman caught in adultery, according to Leviticus 20:10. How could a wife, guilty of fornication, or adultery, under the law of Moses, be given a writing of divorcement and be caused to commit adultery with whosoever marries her, that is divorced? Jesus is clear, in these examples, that the wife is not guilty of fornication, but is still caused to commit adultery if she marries another man now that she is divorced. This is the only way that Matthew 5:31-32, and Matthew 19:9 keep harmony with Romans 7:2-3, and 1 Corinthians 7:39.
Unlike the synoptic gospels of Mark and Luke, which were written to evangelize the Gentiles, Matthew was written to the Jews, and has of 24 characteristics that identify it as intended for the house of Israel.
The ancient Jews called the betrothed (engaged) "husband" and "wife" according to Deuteronomy 22:23-24, Matthew 1:18-25, and Luke 2:5-7.
Deuteronomy 24:1-4 (Moses's precept of divorce and remarriage) was never for fornication or adultery. Allowing those guilty of fornication and adultery to remain living and become a prospect for remarriage was against the law of Moses in Deuteronomy 22:13-24 and Leviticus 20:10, which commanded that those who were found guilty of fornication and adultery be put away from Israel, and stoned to death.
The law of Moses was not given to the world, only to the Jews. From the exodus, to Christ's death on the cross, the law of Moses governed the Jewish people. Christ's death on the cross caused the Jews to become dead to the law of Moses, so they could be joined to Christ under a New Covenant. This is what Jesus's fulfillment of the law of Moses, including Deuteronomy 24:1-4 (Moses's precept of divorce and remarriage), means. Paul gave several warnings to Christian believers against keeping the ordinances of law of Moses as justification, over following Christ and his commands under the New Covenant with Christ. Keeping the ordinances of the law is no longer possible, for Israel, and that is why Christ prophesied that the temple would be destroyed. These scriptures make it clear that if you choose the law over Christ, that you must keep the whole law: Romans 7:4, Galatians 3:1-9, Galatians 3:10-29, Galatians 4:1-7, Galatians 4:21-31, and Galatians 5:1-15.
Being unequally yoked to unbelievers is not a cause for divorce, once two become one-flesh in a covenant of marriage, according to 1 Corinthians 7:12-14. Many one-flesh covenant marriages between unbelievers are recognized by God in the scriptures, most notably the marriage covenants between Herodias and King Herod's brother Philip, Potiphar and his wife, Ahab and Jezebel, and Ruth to her deceased husband Mahlon by Boaz when he took her to be his wife.
Some are teaching that 1 Corinthians 7:15 implies that those who are abandoned, by an unbelieving spouse, are "no longer bound" in a one-flesh covenant of marriage. The reason this is in conflict is due to the way some translations word it, which gives it an entirely different meaning, and context. 1 Corinthians 7:15, says, "But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so. In such cases the brother or sister is not enslaved. God has called you to peace." As you can see, the actual scripture says "not enslaved" which means that the husband or wife is not enslaved to sin with the unbelieving spouse, and is free to worship Christ in peace. Subsequent translations have changed the words to imply that they nullify the marriage covenant, which is not at all the case. The issue that this creates is with 1 Corinthians 7:10-11, which says, "10To the married I give this command (not I, but the Lord): A wife must not separate from her husband. 11But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband. And a husband must not divorce his wife." As you can see, those who claim 1 Corinthians 7:15 shows the Apostle Paul giving those who are abandoned permission to remarry, do not understand the command that Christ gives is to an abandoned husband, in 1 Corinthians 7:11, and that he "must not divorce" his wife, and his wife is commanded to "remain unmarried or else be reconciled" to her husband. The theory that 1 Corinthians 7:15 nullifies two as being one-flesh, due to one's unbelief, puts the Apostle Paul directly at odds with Christ, and himself, by implying that Paul has issued an opposing command to verses 10-14 in verse 15.
Some also teach that 1 Corinthians 7:27-28 is referring to both divorced men and virgin women, and not exclusively to men and women (virgins) who have never been married. This has been falsely taught for some time in churches as referring to anyone who is not currently in a marriage, which, for them, also includes those who are divorced. This is a very false assumption, and puts these verses in a different context, that is at odds with both the teachings of Christ and the apostle Paul. We see Paul refer to virgins, which signifies the unmarried who have never before been wed, which is the proper context here. We see Paul saying clearly that it is good for virgins, which is also speaking to never before wed men here, "that it is good for a man so to be." He goes on to say, "Art thou bound unto a wife? seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife? seek not a wife." Who is he referring to here? Men who, like himself, have never married. The word "bound", in these verses, is a clear reference to betrothal (engagement) and not to a one-flesh covenant of marriage. The ancient Jews were considered bound as husband and wife during the betrothal (espousal/engagement) before becoming one-flesh in a covenant of marriage, through consummation. This is affirmed by the context of the term "bound" seen in Numbers 30:14-16.
The Jewish couples in ancient Israel, who were betrothed (engaged) were also bound together until death, either by execution for fornication, or by other causes. Then Paul says, "But and if thou marry, thou has not sinned", which is who? The men who had never married in the congregation at Corinth. So he begins with verses 25-26 speaking exclusively to men that have never married. Paul then says, "and if a virgin marry, she hath not sinned", which is speaking directly in regard to virgin women who have never been married, within the congregation, not divorced women. Notice that verse 34 says, "There is difference also between a wife and a virgin. The unmarried woman careth for the things of the Lord, that she may be holy both in body and in spirit: but she that is married careth for the things of the world, how she may please her husband." Paul speaks plainly when he says "there is a difference between a wife and a virgin." Paul goes on to say, "But if any man think that he behaveth himself uncomely toward his virgin, if she pass the flower of her age, and need so require, let him do what he will, he sinneth not: let them marry." This is speaking of a virgin who has become of age to bear children when it says, "let them marry." This is a clear command, to a single man, who has taken a virgin to be his wife. Paul then says, "Nevertheless he that standeth stedfast in his heart, having no necessity, but hath power over his own will, and hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin, doeth well." This is referring again to the single man who decides it is better not to marry, but to stay betrothed (engaged), under the present distress, by saying that he "hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin." Paul then says, "So then he that giveth her in marriage doeth well; but he that giveth her not in marriage doeth better", which again means single men, in the congregation, who have betrothed a wife, do well if they marry, and those who choose not to marry their virgin brides do better, under the current climate. For more proper context of the word "bound", let's look further down in this chapter to verse 39, which says, "39The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord" (1 Corinthians 7:39). For so long, these scriptures, between verses 25-38, have been twisted and used to enable divorce and remarriage, by wayward churches and teachers, and have caused many to stumble and to be trapped in unscriptural unions.
The use of the woman at the well, in regard to marriage, falsely implies that Christ was endorsing remarriage after a divorce. This teaching is in defiance of Matthew 22:23-28, which shows a woman who had been widowed seven times, and entered into each subsequent marriage without any scriptural conflicts with God's law of marriage (one-flesh covenant) seen in Genesis 2:23-24.
Mark 10:1-12 and Matthew 19:1-12 both record Christ's teaching that day beyond the Jordan. There is no mention of the words "fornication", "writing of divorcement", or "divorced" in Mark's Gospel because Mark was not written to the Jews (as Matthew's Gospel was), but to evangelize the Romans, and likewise Luke to evangelize the Greeks, who had no knowledge of the law of Moses in Deuteronomy 22 or Deuteronomy 24. All of these facts draw a clear understanding that remarriage after a divorce, under the New Covenant with Christ, is a scripturally false and baseless teaching. Please use wisdom when living in any situation against what the scriptures command.
Matthew 5:27-32:
27Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: 28But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. 29And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell. 30And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.
31It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement: 32But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.
I don't find any answer to the contrary, in terms of the above scriptures. These scriptures are very clear when it comes to Jesus both defining adultery, and the punishment for those who do not repent.
During the time of Christ, an adulteress (caught in the act of adultery) could not be given a certificate of divorce in order to become another man's wife. It would have been a violation of the law in Deuteronomy 22:22 and Leviticus 20:10. A wife (espoused/engaged/betrothed) found guilty of fornication, such as written in Matthew 5:31-32 and Matthew 19:9, was stoned to death according to the law in Deuteronomy 22:13-21 and Deuteronomy 22:23-24. A wife found guilty, in either case, was stoned to death. Under the law of Moses, it was not lawful for her to be left alive in order to seek another marriage. This means that the wife, that Jesus refers to in Matthew 5:32, could not possibly be guilty, of either fornication or adultery, because she is being given a certificate of divorce. Notice that Jesus is cleary speaking of a wife who is divorced, in Matthew 5:31-32 and Matthew 19:9, which can only mean she has not been found guilty of fornication or adultery. The reasons a betrothed (engaged) wife could not be given a certificate of divorce is because (1) she had not yet entered into marriage as one-flesh with her husband, and (2) she was bound to him in a marriage contract that could only be broken by death from either stoning or other means.
In Matthew 5:17, Jesus declared that he "did not come to destroy the law, but to fulfill". This means that what he is saying about the wife, in Matthew 5:31-32, could not possibly be referring to one who has been found guilty according to the law, but one who is being given a certificate of divorce according to Deuteronomy 24:1-4 (Moses's precept of divorce and remarriage). Jesus affirms what the law says in Matthew 5:31-32 and Matthew 19:9 by stating that issuing a certificate of divorce was for any reason except fornication, because it was unlawful to issue one for the cause of fornication, or for adultery, according to the law. Jesus is speaking in the context of a divorced wife, not one who is guilty of violating the law. This is further emphasized by what Jesus says, in Matthew 5:32, regarding the innocent man who marries her also comitting adultery by entering into marriage with her.
@@ajlouviere202 what about for men and polygamy in the Bible where men were allowed to take multiple wives but for woman is classified adultery.
This is a question. What are your thoughts on that. It says men not to leave their wives but he's not leaving his wife in this situation.
This is going to lead a lot of people astray. Divorce is not permitted.
But it happens. Permitted or not.
@@doglover19601 And it shouldn't. Whether it does or not. Christians have to be above what is and pursue what is ideal.
@@TetrisPhantom of course, but some people were divorced before they were Christians.
@@doglover19601 Sure, but if they're Christians now, then the rules apply.
"And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.”
Matthew 19:9
Mark 10:10-11:
10And in the house the disciples again began questioning Him about this. 11And He said to them, “Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her; 12and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery.”
@@ajlouviere202 Great, so which is it? Because they're mutually exclusive.
@@Razaiel fornication is what people commit against their own body. Whether it is sex with a partner, or masturbation, it is a sin against the body of those who commit it. Adultery is a sin against the one you become one-flesh with, in a covenant of marriage. This is the proper context of these terms.
Those who falsely interpret fornication, as being the same as adultery, cause conflict in Matthew's gospel, by implying that unless adultery is comitted (by the wife during the marriage) then adultery is being caused through a divorce and subsequent remarriage. This hits a wall, when it comes to Matthew 5:31-32, because it would still show that a married wife (if she were not a betrothed wife as shown in Matthew 5:31-32, Matthew 19:9, and also in the case of Mary in Matthew 1:18-25, and Luke 2:5-7) is caused to commit adultery after receiving a certificate of divorce , except it be for (not including) adultery having been comitted previously. So either way, these scriptures still show a wife (during the time of Christ), unless being found guitly of having previously comitted fornication before or during betrothal (Deuteronomy 22:13-21; 23-24,), or found comitting adultery during marriage (Leviticus 20:10, Deuteronomy 22:22), is being caused to commit adultery ("defiled" according to Deuteronomy 24:4) with whosoever marries her after she is divorced.
During the time of Christ, and John the Baptist, it was impossible to give a wife caught in adultery a certificate of divorce, in order to become another man's wife, according to the law in Deuteronomy 22:22 and Leviticus 20:10.
The emphasis should be on the true definition of fornication (sexual immorality/whoredom), as seen in Matthew 5:31-32 and Matthew 19:9, by showing you the context of how it is used in Genesis 38:6-26.
Genesis 38:6-26:
6And Judah takes a wife for Er, his firstborn, and her name [is] Tamar; 7and Er, Judah’s firstborn, is evil in the eyes of YHWH, and YHWH puts him to death. 8And Judah says to Onan, “Go in to the wife of your brother, and marry her, and raise up seed to your brother”; 9and Onan knows that the seed is not [reckoned] his; and it has come to pass, if he has gone in to his brother’s wife, that he has destroyed [it] to the earth, so as not to give seed to his brother; 10and that which he has done is evil in the eyes of YHWH, and He puts him also to death. 11And Judah says to his daughter-in-law Tamar, “Abide [as] a widow at your father’s house, until my son Shelah grows up”; for he said, “Lest he die-even he-like his brothers”; and Tamar goes and dwells at her father’s house.
12And the days are multiplied, and the daughter of Shuah, Judah’s wife, dies; and Judah is comforted, and goes up to his sheep-shearers, he and Hirah his friend the Adullamite, to Timnath. 13And it is declared to Tamar, saying, “Behold, your husband’s father is going up to Timnath to shear his flock”; 14and she turns aside the garments of her widowhood from off her, and covers herself with a veil, and wraps herself up, and sits in the opening of Enayim, which [is] by the way to Timnath, for she has seen that Shelah has grown up, and she has not been given to him for a wife. 15And Judah sees her, and reckons her for a harlot, for she has covered her face, 16and he turns aside to her by the way and says, “Please come, let me come in to you,” for he has not known that she [is] his daughter-in-law; and she says, “What do you give to me, that you may come in to me?” 17And he says, “I send a kid of the goats from the flock.” And she says, “Do you give a pledge until you send [it]?” 18And he says, “What [is] the pledge that I give to you?” And she says, “Your seal, and your ribbon, and your staff which [is] in your hand”; and he gives to her, and goes in to her, and she conceives to him; 19and she rises, and goes, and turns aside her veil from off her, and puts on the garments of her widowhood.
20And Judah sends the kid of the goats by the hand of his friend the Adullamite, to receive the pledge from the hand of the woman, and he has not found her. 21And he asks the men of her place, saying, “Where [is] the separated one-she in Enayim, by the way?” And they say, “There has not been in this [place] a separated one.” 22And he turns back to Judah and says, “I have not found her; and the men of the place also have said, There has not been in this [place] a separated one,” 23and Judah says, “Let her take to herself, lest we become despised; behold, I sent this kid, and you have not found her.”
24And it comes to pass about three months [after], that it is declared to Judah, saying, “Your daughter-in-law Tamar has committed fornication; and also, behold, she has conceived by fornication”: and Judah says, “Bring her out-and she is burned.” 25She is brought out, and she has sent to her husband’s father, saying, “To a man whose these [are], I [am] pregnant”; and she says, “Please discern whose these [are]-the seal, and the ribbons, and the staff.” 26And Judah discerns and says, “She has been more righteous than I, because that I did not give her to my son Shelah”; and he has not added to know her again.
The context of the scriptures above show that Tamar and Judah are both widowed, and Tamar is the widow of Judah's sons Er and Onan, and is living with her father-in-law Judah. Neither of them are married, and Tamar is not betrothed to Judah's youngest son Shelah. She was not a prostitute, but only pretended to be in order to trick her father-in-law, Judah, into fornication in order to force him into marriage. These scriptures in Genesis 38, along with what is written in the law about a betrothed virgin being unfaithful before her wedding night, in Deuteronomy 22:13-21; 23-24, you see what Jesus meant by "except it be for fornication" in Matthew 5:31-32 and Matthew 19:9, and the clear differences between fornication and adultery in the context of the scriptures.
First of all, use the Correct translation.
"And I say unto you; whosoever putteth away his wife, except it be for FORNICATION, and marrieth another committeth adultery " Matthew 19:9 -KJV.
Secondly, Fornication is referring to the Jewish betrothal period before marriage. Matthew 1:18-25 explains. John 8:41 confirms. Fornication can only be committed by single unmarried people. Modern, false translations change the Word from fornication to "sexual immorality, sexual misconduct, marital unfaithfulness, etc" thus distorting the Truth of God's Word on marriage and the doctrine of the marital Covenant being for life
(Romans 7:1-3, 1 Corinthians 7:39)
Notice he already says his wife in that scripture. They are already married
I'm a children's teacher at my church, let me tell you, people really underestimate what divorce and remarriage do to children, especially when they are condoned by the church. I've seen children become unbelievers because some other church accepted their father's or mother's remarriage. The thing is that you have a full time responsibility to your child, which you cannot possibly fulfill if you remarry and have a second family.
Sadly, I went through a divorce back in 2000, and now my ex-husband is on his third marriage, and he has two children, one with each woman... I am not judging, it's just a fact. And a very sad one indeed
Depending on the Home. Protect yourself and your Children.
My parents separated and lived separately and I was very happy about it.. Some Things that go on in marriage are extremely unhealthy for kids. Of course after doing all that can be done to save the marriage then one could divorce. However running to get remarried quickly shows lack of understanding of marriage. Marriage isn't a joke
Amen, Grace... very very sad what happens to children.. The one abandonded needs to pray for reconciliation until the end...only death can separated the deep one flesh tie.
With all due respect, are you sure it's the divorce and marriage that takes a toll on these children and not the toxicity inside the household that led to the divorce in the first place?
If someone divorces some abusive scoundrel, drunkard or some other worthless SOB and remarries some time later, where is the sin in that?
Has anyone addressed abuse? Serious assault where one has been convicted and jailed, is the victim free to remarry?
Why or why not?
if there is abuse the abused needs to protect themselves and separate physically but the abuser needs salvation...forgiveness... but only if he is transformed can there be hope for reconcilation... Remarriage is not permitted bcz there is a possible hope of change
@@alicia4him1 And what if they won't change?
@@angelnunnart How long should be give them to change ? you see the Lord does not ever give up on them. It is VERY hard though but God says no remarriage.. only if spouse dies. Because even at 80 plus years a person can repent and we need to make Jesus our true Husband- : ) He is so true and faithful and better than any husband ... if a man marries a divorced woman he causes her to commit adultery. so difficult but our loneliness can truly be taken away from us by Christ... our all in all.
Did you pray and ask God and seek him before you even married ?
They must separate physically ... but this abusive spouse can be saved... so we mus not divorce ...keep praying for their soul and for a miracle.
I left my wife because she was disrespectful, degrading, non loving, and I belive involved with another woman. During divorce I discovered in addition to those things, she used my identity and sold 100% my fathers inheritance that he gave to me. That was his last dying will that she took from me. She also turned my kids against me. I asked the lord to fix my marriage or find me a loving submissive wife that respectsme as the husband. It turns out that her hidden secrets were revealed, and I completed the divorce process. I'm now remarried to a wonderful woman. I feared I did the wrong thing not knowing the word of God and I hope he will not reject me. I will never reject Jesus as my savior but I hope that I can be forgiven.
Hi mike, God bless you. I am no one to you, but this moved me. We must remember that God forgives all, we are cleansed by the blood of Christ! The more I learn about God, the more I learn about life. God intended marriage to be with people who are equally yoked. I sense your faith and know you are a God fearing man, who honors the covenant of marriage. However from your ex wife, she didn’t reflect the character of God. If she had Jesus in her heart than she would deter from sinning with intent to harm others. We let our feelings make choices and it ends with heartbreak. We make mistakes, we learn and we change through Christ. I’m happy you’re honoring God by finding a woman of God now. God bless you, Jesus forgives you, God loves you.
We are saved through faith in Christ alone not in works lest any man should boast.
@@vladimirhernandez5629 thank you so much for those words. My wife and I are true partners and we share the importance of God's word equally. We are both growing stronger with the understanding God's word. I know I'm not worthy of gods grace which is why I'm so very greatful.
@@iyanayona5348 amen
Hey will not reject you don't listen to people interpretation there's only one unforgivable sin
I don't think a lot of people in these comments has worked with domestic abuse. It can change your perspective.
Of course you must protect yourself from physical abuse. absolutely. keep forgiving and praying. God sees you terrible hurt and wants to comfort you with His love and care. when i say forgive i don´t mean take them back into the home or stay in the home... but in your heart forgive and pray for their salvation and transformation which the Lord so very much wants for them.
Doesn't permit one to remarry.
@@christsavesreadromans1096 It doesn't permit one te return to your former partner.
@@snaphaan5049 One absolutely should return to their first partner if possible.
Thank you so much for this
I've watched both of the videos of this guy talking about this subject. He should not be the one to talk about this subject.
Very True.
Because he's uninformed biblically and outright incorrect on top of it.
@@jasontexas10 Read Genesis 2:24, Matthew 19:5-6, Ephesians 5:25-33...
Afterwards read
Mark 10:7-12
Luke 16:18
Romans 7:1-3
1 Corinthians 7:39
Then compare that consensus of scripture with what he says in the video. Your answer should be CRYSTAL clear. And btw, use the KJV or ASV and dont waste time with modern false translations. 🙏
@@philarevolutionarywarriorp8295 thanx, and don't forget Matt 5. But personally i prefer interlinear bibles.
@@jasontexas10 fair enough, but check out philarevolutionarywarrior
At Mark 10 v 9 it tells us "What God has yolked together, let no man put apart" Many people
in this world today have a casual attitude towards marriage. When their relationship becomes
strained, most just give up and walk out on their marriage mate. That, however is not the
Christian way. (1 Corinthians 7 v 27) Breaking one's marriage vow is equivalent to to lying to
God, and God hates liars! (Leviticus 19 v 12, Proverbs 6 v 16--19) God also hates a treacherous
divorce. (Malachai 2 v 13--16) Jesus taught that the only scriptural ground for dissolving a
marriage vow, is when an innocent mate chooses not to forgive an adulterous partner. (Matthew
19 v 9, Hebrews 13 v 4) What, then, about separation? The bible is clear on this too. (1 Corinthians
7 v 10 and 11) Although the bible does not set out grounds for marital separation, some married
Christians however, have viewed certain situations as a reason for separation, such as the extreme
endangerment to one's life or spirituality by an abusive spouse.
The bible actually says that a man should never be married
@@garygooden5752 Then why in the book of
Genesis, God said that a man should leave
his father and mother, and he, and his wife
should stick together and become as one.
Because he's not looking out for our best interests
Yes, people give up too soon on their marriage... the Lord keeps loving and forgiving the unfaithful one... we need to forgive 70 x 7. We love and forgive our spouse as the Lord keeps forgiving us.
Keep praying and believing for restoration until death or reconciliation.
@@garygooden5752 Actually that a man would be better off not married but it is not forbidden.
When some dude says I think about something the Bible says, stop listening. The Bible is clear and if you ask a Jewish person about the betrothal period they will tell you as Jesus said in Matthew. Marriage is for life, nothing can break the covenant and only death of one of the spouses ends it. Do not be deceived.
@Can Ya Diggit? "Wives cannot divorce husbands EVER." WHERE does it EXPLICITLY say that?
Don't go to people who reject Jesus and ask for their understanding of the Bible.
@@stephendevore Romans 7:1-3
@A P but from the beginning, that was not so....eh....
@@stephendevore nothing is ....explicitly....stated.....there in lies the dilemma.....
Good stuff!!
If you can help me by answering the questions below, I would appreciate it.
1) I have not found a text that says that a MAN abandoned (passive) by his wife commits adultery if he marries another woman or that he should remain alone;
2) a woman abandoned, even for an unjust cause (Deut. 24), could remarry (she was not to be stoned as an adulteress, Deut. 22), except to priests (Lev. 21). After the coming of the Lord, the woman unjustly abandoned can no longer marry? Was there more freedom for the abandoned woman before? Jesus said that he would not repeal the Law given by His Father.
3) Why does the text about "divorce" (or separation) appear in Luke in the middle of texts about money?
4) Why is it believed that the union of one flesh is something ontological, and there are several passages in which it is demonstrated that this does not occur (Abraham and Hagar, marriage with foreigners, relations between relatives, Ex. 22,17, I Cor. 5, I Cor .6, Deut. 24...)
5) The verbs allow and command are interchanged in Matthew 19 and Mark 10. Why does almost everyone who preaches Matthew 19 ignore this interchange in Mark 10?
6) Why do people ignore that the procedural question of the divorce certificate has value? Think with me: what was the penalty for adultery? Stoning? Not always. If there were no witnesses and she was guilty, the penalty for the same offense would be different, according to Num. 5. Why is it not noticed that God made this point in Isaiah 50 when asking where the divorce certificate would be?
7) if an unbeliever leaves his believing spouse and disappears in the world. In a short time, no one knows the whereabouts of the person, and not even if he is alive (the Brazilian Civil Code even regulates absence, by the way), the believing spouse would be prohibited from getting married permanently, because how would he know if the other died?
8) do you think that in Corinth there were no divorced people? If in Israel the concept of marriage was no longer there, in the Greek environment there was no divorce? Paul did not give the Corinthians any divorce decrees.
9) Paul told Timothy that doctrines of demons would arise: prohibition of marriages and food. Do you know anywhere banning food only to leaders? I am not. So why interpret that the ban on marriages that would arise would only be for leaders (as we usually interpret it, understanding Catholics in that position)?
10) Paul said in Romans 7 that the wife was bound to her husband unto death by the LAW, not by an indissoluble Neoplatonic ontological bond. The woman could be required by the man if he did not give her a certificate of divorce. But if he gave it, even if unjustly and because of the hardness of heart, she was not bound to him by the LAW. Paul used the rule to use a metaphor.
God bless you!
Bible clearly says divorcing a wife/husband and marrying another woman/man whilst their partners are alive is a sin
100% right
But what of the partner that you're with is abusive?
@@lilyarios1026 Bible permits you to separate ONLY
Then tell me why Jesus used the word "except"...there is a legitimate reason for divorce...only one but it is an exception.
I've been in this situation, and the two people who are adulterers have gotten married and our living in sin when thinking God wedded them in holy matrimony, which is a lie straight from the pit of hell. They're conjoined by Satan. Till death do you part! Marriage is a beautiful thing, it is a union of two sinners coming together in Holy matrimony before God, laying hold of Christ! A marriage done in the way I described my ex and her adulterous partner is not of God. Marriage is beautiful because the two people who are conjoined in union with Christ goes a long way. I pray to meet a girl who is equally yoked with me, in that Christ is her all in all. God bless you all.
What God puts together let no man take apart. We disagree here.
yes only when God put together,
ilvana-brazil-usa9422 False. God recognises ALL marriages Believer or unbeliever. Hebrews 13:4. Once Marriage is consumated it is for life. GO study your bible
I am going to have to go with God's plan of salvation on this question.
pray tell....what is that...
@@philipbuckley759 no remarriage until covenant has ended
@@silentj80 thank you.....
@@silentj80 by death. People are trying to make Jesus word and teachings difficult....it isn't.
@@TriciaRP yes!!! It really really isn't hard at all.
The key moment in this video is at 2:49. He says "I don't think that view is convincing." My question to you is, would you bank your life on the words of the bible or man's opinion? He begins stuttering after that. Because he knows the verses that he read went over Jesus saying that remarriage is considered adultery.
Grace, Peace, n LOVE in KING YESHUA, Brethren. How is 1st 7 "disputed"? By us‽
at a certain time one has to take a stand.....thank you....
It may not be sin to divorce in some cases like infidelity or perhaps dissertion, however it often is and our laws of "no fault" divorce enable a devaluing of matrimony. Tragically the divorce rates among churched people basically mirror those of secular society!
I think anyone can justify leaving their spouse. There is no church discipline. Everyone does what is right in their own eyes.
Churched people is not the same as Christian walking in Christ. The obedient Christian in church is sadly not the norm. But then Jesus told us of the narrow and wide gates.
Christ commands not to divorce in 1 Corinthians 7:10-11.
Hello Jack, please read my comment on Joseph and Mary and you will see ...once married divorce is never permitted. Fornication is outside of marriage I found something amazing in the story of Joseph and Mary which explains why Jesus said... ¨... except for fornication....¨
@@leonseva4980 stop going and supporting these churches
Divorce is acceptable for unrepented adultery. Every time remarriage is mentioned the word Adultery is right next to it.
Remarriage is Adultery. I've been divorced by my wife for 12yrs now.
I've remained single ever since.
Glory be to God.
Well done brother. I was just thinking yesterday my mum n dad divorced 30 years ago, he remarried 10 years ago but his new wife was still married at the time but separated now her ex husband has committed suicide. They are both 'Christians' but sadly a death of a lonely unsaved man has resulted in this new union! Are they both in sin? Should they divorce now or remain married either way is not pleasing to God?
@@JesusSaviour4ALL
Short answer, if either one has no living spouse, they can remain married. But if either one of them has a living spouse, they are in Adultery.
Wow, may God bless you for being faithful to His Word.
I'll trust the New Testament scholar on this one. Thanks though.
@@1689solas you would do better to obey Christ's commands and teachings.
You should separate 1st. Pray for them. Don't look for easy out
Don't Stay in an abusive relationship. If you or your children are abused. Out you most Go.
Agreed
My (unbelieving) husband left 6 years ago and took up with another woman. He would not file so I finally did. Am I in the wrong for filing? Is the sin on my hands?
seems impossible but this new marriage is or relationship is not of God so you can pray for restoration no matter how bad it looks or how long it has been... God really really wants to restore marriages.
I don't think so. Adultery allows a person to divorce. However you must remain as you are, no remarriage as long as he lives. I am in the same predicament. Be strong and pray and God will heal you and he himself your provider and protector.
Nah. That's prima facie infidelity so it's permitted.
United forever. Please look up the word forever. Forever means until you no longer give breath. It doesn't mean until something else comes along or if he looses his job or if she cannot bare children. Or if she looses her looks..
What if he beats her up on a regular basis? Sexually abuses his kids?
You use a lot of “I think” in your explanations. What counts is what the word of God says, not someone’s opinion.
Marriage is M GTOW
People don't follow the bible meaning of marriage because it involves feelings. People don't want anyone telling them rules when love is involved. They put their relationship first. And then put the bible second, in an interpretation that fits their love life
this is a scary thought...
Yes, you are right
What if you wernt SAVED when u 1st got married, you didn't know ,,,does this mean now as a Christian you have to stay alone forever.
@@shanny7583 I wonder the same. And think how’s that fair. I don’t think that answer is found in the Bible
@@shanny7583 yes. I god did not give us grace.
But it is written that a man who marries a divorced woman is adulterous (Mat.5:32) What does that mean is this case?
You can almost hear Satan say, "it's never the ideal but......."
Look to God for wisdom and knowledge
And allowing what is written in the Scriptures to overturn what you may personally think!
I divorced my 2nd spouse when I read in the Bible that I wasn’t eligible for it, because I wasn’t a widow. (Romans 7:2-3, Matthew 5:32, Matthew 19:9, Luke 16:18, 1 Corinthians 7.) Abstain from all appearance of evil. (1 Thessalonians 5).
and how does the context dictate the definition.....not to mention the work, of Erasmus and Luther, in changing the definition....
nice explanation of a spiritually sensitive/important topic; maybe consider giving a short answer at the beginning then giving the explanation, toward the end. kind of 'cliff-hangy' throughout.
That's because it attempts to bring believers back under subjection of the law (Moses's precept of divorce and remarriage) in Deuteronomy 24:1-4.
because if he had stated his conclusion at the beginning it would have been plain to all that he is a liar. the devil's servants are more subtly than that.
Thankyou for taking the time and explaining it so beautifully
Ok, this is not a slam on Dr Schreiner here, I have enjoyed many of his teachings, but on this subject, I believe, he is dead wrong in his conclusion. This discussion always starts with something like this, "divorce is never a good idea". then folks, as he does, end up justifying divorce. Of course it's not a good idea, and Jesus was not justifying divorce and remarriage. He was answering them according the the Law of Moses on this subject, which was still in place during His earthly ministry. The first view that Dr Schreiner gave here is the correct view... and flows along with a biblical world view. Too many Christians today have this so twisted up. Marriage is between 1 man, and 1 woman... and is a life long commitment, till death do us part.
M GTOW
And adultery is punishable with death. Let’s not forget this. Jesus never once changed the consequences of sin. Those are still in place. So there’s that. Nowhere in scripture can anyone point to Jesus changing the consequences for violating a covenant. Marriage or otherwise, the consequences of violation of a covenant is death. If we’re going to be covenant people shouldn’t we take this seriously? Because Marriage permanence advocates claim separation is the only option but 1Tim 5:6 teaches the one who lives in adultery is dead while they live. So I guess they are dead if they commit adultery and the one who was innocent is free to treat them as dead.
Cast the first stone.
@@snaphaan5049 treating them as does means no stone need be cast.
@@johnborland7865 Should the woman at the well and Mary been treated as dead? Also, did Moses allow a terrible sin in Israel when he gave them the divorce bill? God was pretty strict about following his rules so what happened there?
Also, I get we can strive to be perfect (and that Jesus died for our sins) but can we achieve it? Is it possible to be sinless?
Thank you.This makes it more clear.
"I think we would all agree polygamy is wrong. Ideally God would want us to have just one wife, but if you ask God to forgive you you can stay in those relationships." I think we would all agree incest is wrong....but! I think we all agree, pedophilia is wrong, but...? Marriage is clearly defined in Romans 7:2-3 and is until death do they part! Don't listen to heretical teachers who will lead you astray, by appealing to your emotions. God never said trust in man!
Good ! Keep standing for only the truth... exception clause is for the ones who want their selfish way and do not want to fight for their marriage NO MATTER WHAT.
Thank you for your strong witness... your stand on this matter of GREAT importance. We are so carnal still... i need a lot of work from the Potter but we must give all to Christ. we can see by the comments people want to do their own will and seek scripture to prove it is okay. I know it is hard but what is harder ? God is so ready to provide all you need emotionally.
If there is ever sexual immorality in a marriage, reconciliation is always the better choice. It brings such a powerful testimony within your own relationship, but above all, God is absolutely glorified. After all, our lives are about Him not us. God bless you.
fornication...
Very wise and true. Only the holy spirit can reveal this.
How about if the husband beats the wife regularly? Or beats the children? Or if the wife verbally abuses the husband, or the kids? Should the couple stay together even though the kids are traumatized, and will carry on the behaviors they learned from their parents?
@@barbarapeterson4000 I specifically said sexual immorality. Nothing else. You’ve obviously given an extreme circumstance. Probably just short of the husband killing the wife. Nothing new when someone opposes a view in an argument.
But of course I wouldn’t agree to physical violence in a relationship. Besides, I’m speaking of two married Christians. If a man is beating his wife or abusing his children, I wouldn’t call him a Christian.
@@heir_to_the_promise So if a man who calls himself a Christian beats his wife...he is not a Christian and she is free to divorce him?
I wonder if the guy's pastor would agree with your view? From what I've read, pastors normally tell the wife to put up with it because the marriage, no matter how awful it may be, is not about her and her misery...it's all about glorifying God.
I won’t lie I do appreciate this perspective despite the fact I hold true to the scriptures dearly. It’s interesting to say that least. It provides great talking points and reveals misconceptions as well as misinterpretations that can be countered with the word of God.
What's your understanding of this topic?
The divorce and remarriage for adultery doctrine is based solely on the supposed guilt of the wife in Matthew 5:32 and 19:9. However, the wife, in the above scriptures, is clearly not guilty of fornication because the Jews (that Jesus was speaking to) were still living under the law, and if fornication was discovered, there was a moral obligation to report the offender according to Deuteronomy 22:13-24. The wife, who would have been found guilty of fornication, was subsequently stoned to death, according to the law, which had still governed the Jews up until Christ's death on the cross. The same for a woman caught in adultery, according to Leviticus 20:10. How could a wife, guilty of fornication, or adultery, under the law of Moses, be given a writing of divorcement and be caused to commit adultery with whosoever marries her, that is divorced? Jesus is clear, in these examples, that the wife is not guilty of fornication, but is still caused to commit adultery if she marries another man now that she is divorced. This is the only way that Matthew 5:31-32, and Matthew 19:9 keep harmony with Romans 7:2-3, and 1 Corinthians 7:39.
Unlike the synoptic gospels of Mark and Luke, which were written to evangelize the Gentiles, Matthew was written to the Jews, and has of 24 characteristics that identify it as intended for the house of Israel.
The ancient Jews called the betrothed (engaged) "husband" and "wife" according to Deuteronomy 22:23-24, Matthew 1:18-25, and Luke 2:5-7.
Deuteronomy 24:1-4 (Moses's precept of divorce and remarriage) was never for fornication or adultery. Allowing those guilty of fornication and adultery to remain living and become a prospect for remarriage was against the law of Moses in Deuteronomy 22:13-24 and Leviticus 20:10, which commanded that those who were found guilty of fornication and adultery be put away from Israel, and stoned to death.
The law of Moses was not given to the world, only to the Jews. From the exodus, to Christ's death on the cross, the law of Moses governed the Jewish people. Christ's death on the cross caused the Jews to become dead to the law of Moses, so they could be joined to Christ under a New Covenant. This is what Jesus's fulfillment of the law of Moses, including Deuteronomy 24:1-4 (Moses's precept of divorce and remarriage), means. Paul gave several warnings to Christian believers against keeping the ordinances of law of Moses as justification, over following Christ and his commands under the New Covenant with Christ. Keeping the ordinances of the law is no longer possible, for Israel, and that is why Christ prophesied that the temple would be destroyed. These scriptures make it clear that if you choose the law over Christ, that you must keep the whole law: Romans 7:4, Galatians 3:1-9, Galatians 3:10-29, Galatians 4:1-7, Galatians 4:21-31, and Galatians 5:1-15.
Being unequally yoked to unbelievers is not a cause for divorce, once two become one-flesh in a covenant of marriage, according to 1 Corinthians 7:12-14. Many one-flesh covenant marriages between unbelievers are recognized by God in the scriptures, most notably the marriage covenants between Herodias and King Herod's brother Philip, Potiphar and his wife, Ahab and Jezebel, and Ruth to her deceased husband Mahlon by Boaz when he took her to be his wife.
Some are teaching that 1 Corinthians 7:15 implies that those who are abandoned, by an unbelieving spouse, are "no longer bound" in a one-flesh covenant of marriage. The reason this is in conflict is due to the way some translations word it, which gives it an entirely different meaning, and context. 1 Corinthians 7:15, says, "But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so. In such cases the brother or sister is not enslaved. God has called you to peace." As you can see, the actual scripture says "not enslaved" which means that the husband or wife is not enslaved to sin with the unbelieving spouse, and is free to worship Christ in peace. Subsequent translations have changed the words to imply that they nullify the marriage covenant, which is not at all the case. The issue that this creates is with 1 Corinthians 7:10-11, which says, "10To the married I give this command (not I, but the Lord): A wife must not separate from her husband. 11But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband. And a husband must not divorce his wife." As you can see, those who claim 1 Corinthians 7:15 shows the Apostle Paul giving those who are abandoned permission to remarry, do not understand the command that Christ gives is to an abandoned husband, in 1 Corinthians 7:11, and that he "must not divorce" his wife, and his wife is commanded to "remain unmarried or else be reconciled" to her husband. The theory that 1 Corinthians 7:15 nullifies two as being one-flesh, due to one's unbelief, puts the Apostle Paul directly at odds with Christ, and himself, by implying that Paul has issued an opposing command to verses 10-14 in verse 15.
Some also teach that 1 Corinthians 7:27-28 is referring to both divorced men and virgin women, and not exclusively to men and women (virgins) who have never been married. This has been falsely taught for some time in churches as referring to anyone who is not currently in a marriage, which, for them, also includes those who are divorced. This is a very false assumption, and puts these verses in a different context, that is at odds with both the teachings of Christ and the apostle Paul. We see Paul refer to virgins, which signifies the unmarried who have never before been wed, which is the proper context here. We see Paul saying clearly that it is good for virgins, which is also speaking to never before wed men here, "that it is good for a man so to be." He goes on to say, "Art thou bound unto a wife? seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife? seek not a wife." Who is he referring to here? Men who, like himself, have never married. The word "bound", in these verses, is a clear reference to betrothal (engagement) and not to a one-flesh covenant of marriage. The ancient Jews were considered bound as husband and wife during the betrothal (espousal/engagement) before becoming one-flesh in a covenant of marriage, through consummation. This is affirmed by the context of the term "bound" seen in Numbers 30:14-16.
The Jewish couples in ancient Israel, who were betrothed (engaged) were also bound together until death, either by execution for fornication, or by other causes. Then Paul says, "But and if thou marry, thou has not sinned", which is who? The men who had never married in the congregation at Corinth. So he begins with verses 25-26 speaking exclusively to men that have never married. Paul then says, "and if a virgin marry, she hath not sinned", which is speaking directly in regard to virgin women who have never been married, within the congregation, not divorced women. Notice that verse 34 says, "There is difference also between a wife and a virgin. The unmarried woman careth for the things of the Lord, that she may be holy both in body and in spirit: but she that is married careth for the things of the world, how she may please her husband." Paul speaks plainly when he says "there is a difference between a wife and a virgin." Paul goes on to say, "But if any man think that he behaveth himself uncomely toward his virgin, if she pass the flower of her age, and need so require, let him do what he will, he sinneth not: let them marry." This is speaking of a virgin who has become of age to bear children when it says, "let them marry." This is a clear command, to a single man, who has taken a virgin to be his wife. Paul then says, "Nevertheless he that standeth stedfast in his heart, having no necessity, but hath power over his own will, and hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin, doeth well." This is referring again to the single man who decides it is better not to marry, but to stay betrothed (engaged), under the present distress, by saying that he "hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin." Paul then says, "So then he that giveth her in marriage doeth well; but he that giveth her not in marriage doeth better", which again means single men, in the congregation, who have betrothed a wife, do well if they marry, and those who choose not to marry their virgin brides do better, under the current climate. For more proper context of the word "bound", let's look further down in this chapter to verse 39, which says, "39The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord" (1 Corinthians 7:39). For so long, these scriptures, between verses 25-38, have been twisted and used to enable divorce and remarriage, by wayward churches and teachers, and have caused many to stumble and to be trapped in unscriptural unions.
The use of the woman at the well, in regard to marriage, falsely implies that Christ was endorsing remarriage after a divorce. This teaching is in defiance of Matthew 22:23-28, which shows a woman who had been widowed seven times, and entered into each subsequent marriage without any scriptural conflicts with God's law of marriage (one-flesh covenant) seen in Genesis 2:23-24.
Mark 10:1-12 and Matthew 19:1-12 both record Christ's teaching that day beyond the Jordan. There is no mention of the words "fornication", "writing of divorcement", or "divorced" in Mark's Gospel because Mark was not written to the Jews (as Matthew's Gospel was), but to evangelize the Romans, and likewise Luke to evangelize the Greeks, who had no knowledge of the law of Moses in Deuteronomy 22 or Deuteronomy 24. All of these facts draw a clear understanding that remarriage after a divorce, under the New Covenant with Christ, is a scripturally false and baseless teaching. Please use wisdom when living in any situation against what the scriptures command.
@@ajlouviere202 thank you for your response.
I can see your points from scripture.
Jesus said
"Because of the hardness of hearts Moses commended you to give a certificate of divorce and send her away...."
My point is man's hearts are still hard today. There are those who have no interest in living their life according to God's word, they discard and move on like their wife is rubbish... And some even kill.
Were hearts hard at the beginning?
I just don't understand how a faithful Christian wife married to a man who does not love God or His ways is not able to marry when a non believing Husband divorces her and goes off with another woman.
It goes against what the LORD requires of us:
Love mercy, seek justice and walk humbly with your God. Micah 6-8
If the man was to stay, forbidden to divorce his hardened heart would cause him to hate her which is as murder anyway! (1 John 3:15)
Then there is the case of the adulterous wife. If she does not repent and continues in her sin, is not the marriage bed defiled? She is now one with 2 men?! God when He divorced Israel said he would take her back if she would only ACKNOWLEDGE her sin. And for the record he didn't stone her as was His law. He showed mercy. Of course a Husband should show love and mercy if his wife repents and resumes to walk with God. But if not?!
Is not the person who is not God's dead in their sins anyway? Thus DEAD. Allowing the other to be free and remarry?
I honestly can not see how two born again Christians can not walk together to have a blessed marriage as they abide in Christ and His word.
And for this reason can see that their would be no exemption for divorce or remarriage.... Why would there be?!
From all my studies the "exemption" clause makes sense as SEXUAL IMMORALITY. The death penalty no longer is....why... Because the person who continues in sin and does not ACKNOWLEDGE it as sin but continues is DEAD, they do not want God or eternal life.
Thus any other reason to divorce is wrong. If you want to be like Christ you won't divorce for burning toast, not in love anymore, bored, etc. You would love as Christ loved the Church.
God bless us all as we hunger and thirst for righteousness. Take care.
@@maunder01 Jesus also says, "whosoever shall marry her that is divorced commits adultery." What are your thoughts on what Jesus is saying? Does only the man who marries a divorced woman commit adultery, or do both commit adultery when they marry?
@@ajlouviere202 this is another scenario again.
Thankful for this channel!❤️
You think they are free to remarry is different from knowing or speculating throughout this video. There is no such thing as divorce in the entire bible.It is man made.Exception clause was meant for the Jews in their time and that was before marriage and it was referring to fornication.When you fornicate you are not married.When you commit adultery you are married.So fornication is before marriage.Either you reconcile with your husband or wife,or remain single.Read Gods word and stop playing around with words.Fear Him.He can throw your soul into Hell for eternity.Life is too short to philosophy around.You do not own your life anymore.God is in control,if not then the devil will rule your life and then you can go and remarry.You will be called an adulterer the rest of your life,the church will look down on you and you will continue to look for a pastor like this man to tell you its ok to remarry and go to Hell.
John Lynam? Correct spelling? I'd like that read his work. Any help?
The Lord God told me to go back to my Husband. Yea He said HUSBAND. I had been divorced from him for about 3 yars att that tim by the goverment. But God said husband not my former husband. Cos God the almighty hate divorce.
@Douglas the same question needs to be answered. I am asking specifically about the example Jesus gives of the wife, in Matthew 5:31-32, being actally found guilty of fornication, in these verses, or not guilty of fornication?
You corrected your situation don’t worry bout what satan says
Good for you Grace. God honors Obedience to His Word
God only speaks to us through His Word. But yes, God does hate divorce, and He "told you" (through His Word) to go back to your husband if the divorce occurred under unbiblical, non-permissible grounds.
@@zandrello what if I didn’t get married in a church and only did a court wedding? Is court wedding same as church wedding?
Your grace and love is so very evident in your answer. Thank you.
Do you choose to follow man blindly, or be obedient to Christ and his commands?
grace does not allow for sin.....
Gene Groover- there's no Grace and love in this video only lies and manipulations.
I have a question what happens if you remarried as a Christian ? Are you saying I should end the new marriage and stay single ?
This is nice. I got in trouble over talking to you . Meeting after meeting
Many reasons that will permit divorce, but you can Not remarry for as long as the person you where married to, then you are bound to death.
That doesn't make sense at all because there's only one unforgivable sin from what I've read so your not continuously on adultery pray ask forgiveness your forgiven
God also gave us the Holy Spirit to lead us into truth. And to give us his view and wisdom on what we should do🙌🏽
That is a cop out to say you can do whatever you want.
So what are you really alluding to if you don't mind me asking?
The wisdom from the Holy spirit must be according to God's word, may I add.
Robin, the Holy Spirit agrees the the WORD, so he won't tell you different than what the Word says.
1 John 5:7 (KJV) For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
If I can't do anything else, I'm telling you read, 👉🏽👉🏽Divorce and Remarriage: What the Church DIDN'T Tell You! Oh. It will knock your socks off!! My jaw was on the floor after reading. You won't have any questions left after.
So. What about divorce prior to accepting christ. I'm remarried for 22 years after meeting christ.
I also preach and teach. Some churches will not allow me to preach or teach because of prior marriage.
God forgave ALL my sins and man trying to supercede God..
So honestly what is your thoughts
...also does it matter if it's divorce or separation ? Is one more moral than the other?
I notice you made no reference to scripture when you said "so divorce and remarriage are permitted" because although I am not adept at memorizing specific numeric references in The Scripture I do remember the content of God's Living Word accurately in my own way.
Consequently I clearly remember the passage when Jesus addresses the disciples with regard to the subject of Marriage and Divorce and states words to the effect;
"Although the elders wrote certificates of divorce I tell you this, divorce is only permitted in the case of marital unfaithfulness (adultery) and any man who sleeps with a woman so divorced causes, her, to commit adultery".
There is, no, gray area there, no room for interpretation or any other form of latitude because it is extremely, concise and specific.
Whatever else anyone may choose or want to think regarding this, it is unequivocally clear that if divorced women remarry but are not reconciled with their husband in doing so which is to say they sleep with another man in consummation of a marriage then such men, cause such women, to commit adultery and both sin.
Pursuant to this divorce is only, permitted in cases of infidelity and remarriage is only, permitted if a woman is reconciled to her husband.
My brother in-law is a retired Minister of God with children who have divorced and remarried and while discussing this subject with him he made reference to a statement attributed to one of the disciples (Paul) which conflicts with what is attributed to The Messiah.
Surely however any statement or teaching attributed to The Messiah who is without sin must, exert over-riding influence on the undoubtedly more carnal interpretations of any carnal man which is to say someone not conceived by The Holy Spirit because all, carnal men have sinned and fallen short of the Glory of God which is why the Messiah sacrificed himself.
No one, should contrive to interpret scripture in order to corroborate what people want to hear no matter how noble or compassionate their motives may be.
They should instead teach what The Word Of God states rather than stretching possibilities inherent to 'suggestion' and 'implication' to a point where they are so transparent their fallacy is obvious.
Lots of reading into the texts here. For one thing, the "exception clause" in Matthew 5 and 19 has to do with what are grounds for an instance of adultery, not justification for the divorce. For another, interpreting "you are not bound" in 1 Cor. 7 to also apply beyond the scope of the text (the unbeliever insisting on separating) to remarriage as well is a big stretch.
Paul's declaration in 1 Cor. 7 that the believing spouse is no longer bound implies the freedom to remarry. It wouldn't make any sense to say the someone no longer has an obligation to a prior marriage, only to deny them remarriage. If words mean anything, one who is unbound is free by definition.
@@mchristr it can simply mean that the Christian is not bound to live with them if they do not consent. Because this is a completely viable possibility, it requires more from the text to say it clearly refers to the actual marriage being severed in the eyes of God such that remarriage is allowable.
"Bound" or "bondage" in 1 Cor 7:15 is not the same word for the marital bond. Actually, the Greek text literally says "the brother or sister has not been enslaved." If an unbelieving mate leaves, Paul's command is to let them leave; they are not slaves to their mate, they are slaves to Christ. If it were the word for the marital bond, it wouldn't make sense since the tense is PAST. The interpretation would have Paul saying "You have not been married," which is absurd considering he's addressing married couples. Thus, according to Scriptures, desertion, as many falsely claim, is not grounds for divorce.
@@markinvt right and separated couples can have their marriage restored by the Lord.... never give up hope for restoration ... God´s know will. He will be working on this for you He wants to see restoration. ... salvation of prodigals.
@@mchristr it says not under bondage....a different word.....this whole subject is racked with mis translated, and mis used terms...
Can someone help me out here pls .I know a man that's been married before and now married to another woman.his first marriage the woman cheated on him supposably.
so he divorced her and now is married to another woman so that means he never sinned ? In that area ?
My question is what happens to someone who comes to Christ whoss had multiple divorces in the past before they became a Christian, but is in a current marriage? Do they then need to divorce their current spouse and reconcile with the first spouse?
I would venture so. No the reconciling part but the divorcing current spouse. You have to repent of any sin that God shows you is a sin, you can repent divorce but how can you repent an adulterous "marriage' if you stay in it?
I would pray about it and also consider the benefit of the innocent children, who are born into this. God say in marriage the two become one flesh. Does that mean children perhaps? It is not clear from scripture.
My personal opinion, is where your children are, there should your loyalty lie. But this is just me thinking.
1 Corinthians 7:20- (Each person should remain in the situation they were in when God called them). (2 Cor 5:17 If any man be in Christ, he is a new creation.) You are not required to divorce current spouse nor reconcile with former spouse because you came to Christ.
I like how u explain things!!🙏
The gospel is clear until death do you part.
Except if your spouse cheats
@@deonmay7860 that's not what Jesus says in Matthew
@@deonmay7860 true, you right.
@@ebenezeramare1
Mark 10:10-12:
10And in the house the disciples again began questioning Him about this. 11And He said to them, “Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her; 12and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery.”
@@ajlouviere202
Millions of reprobate Christians have divorced & remarried disobeying the Lord Christ, and so will pay the grave penalty.
"9 Or know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God?
**Be not deceived:**
neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with men,
10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners,
shall inherit the kingdom of God"
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 (ASV)
They don't understand that when a person becomes "DECEIVED" they are not AWARE of it themselves....
Like the end of this video, if you committed adultery then divorce your spouse and you are permitted to remarry( not encouraged), but lots of people using this ( or interpret in their own way), just commit adultery first so that they can divorce their partner.
Then what pastors would say it about the situation? Church should still bless the cheaters?
Really no excuse for divorce and no scriptures that say you can remarry except of your spouse dies. The exception in Matt 19 does not apply in today´s world. At the time Jesus spoke these words .. at this time in history and in His culture.. engaged couples were considered husband and wife even though there had been no wedding yet or consummation... sooo that is why the word fornication (coming together before the wedding and consummation) was grounds for divorce. That is why Joseph used the word divorce... he did not say separation. But once there is a wedding and they come together then they are ONE and divorce is forbidden.
When Jesus refers to what Moses said, he referred to Deut 24, in which Moses talks about wifes (Hebrew- ASHE- woman), and in which instances it is allowed (for that time). Now Jesus talks about the same type of marriage and wifes as in the reference. The NT was written in greek, so the word is GUNAIKOS- woman. If in one reference they are referred as wifes, that means that in both cases they mean wifes and if not, then the Bible contradicts itself. Which one will you have?
This pastor need to remember that it was Moses in the old testament that divorce was granted and God didn't grant it. Also we are not under the old testament.Jesus never granted divorce.The new testament Jesus says if you think about it you have commited the sin.
He said under adultery, it is ok
@Ebey is your King That means that if she committed it before marriage not after. Because no one sleep with a woman before marriage. Divorce was granted if they married and the man found out she had sex before marriage with another then that was reason for granting divorce. if she was unfaithful after they were married divorce was not granted. It was as the word say in Matthew 19:8. Moses permitted divorce Not God or Jesus!
Moses got the understanding directly from God. Jesus did not insinuate Moses made it up but rather that Jesus himself gave those rules and now is further clarifying it. Similarly when he starts with... You have been told... then goes on to clarify forgiveness/vengeance, adultery of the heart etc.
Bringing the new covenant by expounding on the old.
My (unbelieving) husband left 6 years ago and took up with another woman. He would not file so I finally did. Am I in the wrong for filing? Is the sin on my hands?
@@MrsYoung-in9ov not a issue. He abandoned you and committed adultery.
Recently I've been commenting quite a bit regarding the Marriage Permanence Doctrine, and picking apart specific details. The doctrine says that divorce is generally prohibited and will not be recognized by God. And if you do divorce and remarry, you effectively lose your salvation, or become ineligible for salvation if you aren't already saved.
This time I want to reveal what motivates me to attack this doctrine so relentlessly.
I sincerely believe the Marriage Permanence Doctrine is a thoroughly detestable and blasphemous heresy that originated in the Pits of Hell. I consider that doctrine to be roughly morally equivalent to Nazism or White Supremacy. Yes, it really is that evil. It is also easily disprovable when other scripture verses are read and understood in context.
So I don't just argue against it to engage in some academic debate. I consider it a hideous and monstrous blasphemy that ought to be sent back to Hell where it belongs. The teaching slanders God. It keeps the abused and oppressed in bondage. And it discredits the Faith as a whole.
Don't get me wrong. The intent is that marriage be lifelong. If it was legit to dump your spouse for any reason, no reason, or simply so you can shag some cutie that comes along, then marriage might as well not exist at all. Dumping a faithful spouse for some frivolous reason is treacherous and evil. But the marriage permanence doctrine is also evil because it denies adequate recourse to those whose spouses flagrantly violate their marital vows. Real life is not the Hallmark Channel. And "separate, but don't divorce" is not an adequate remedy in most cases.
I've seen people on the other side make claims like "The Word of God is very clear! No divorce allowed! Even if he hits you!" Please do not believe such people. The Word of God contains no such mandate. Anybody can fart out bible quotes to give the illusion of support for their position. But a solid relationship with God made possible through our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and informed by the Holy Ghost will help us all expose and reject such destructive falsehoods like the Marriage Permanence Doctrine.
If you are a Church elder reading this: please remember that tolerating abusive marriages in your congregation will do far greater damage to your credibility and the reputation of your assembly than any divorce would. It is the former that is a sign of moral decay, not the latter. Discouraging divorce even in cases of egregious evil is cruel, it is morally bankrupt, and it is an act discreditable to the Faith. Have nothing to do with it!
If two people can't live peacefully then how can it be called a marriage. You are right. These people can forgive every sin including murder but not divorce and remarriage.
@@k530i4u What I've realized when I learned about the Marriage Permanence Doctrine is that there is definitely an audience for restrictive legalistic teachings. In other words, the unsound teachings that the "itching ears" want to hear can also be more restrictive. It meets some need of theirs to promote this kind of thing.
If two women had come to Jesus and asked which is better for an unwanted child: aborting the child or giving it up for adoption, Jesus would have told them that the will of God from the beginning was that children be born of the permanent union between one man and one woman. The child is half his and half hers and the representation of the two in one flesh that God has joined and no man can separate. Therefore neither abortion nor giving a child up for adoption is the way it was meant to be from the beginning.
If this had happened, would we today be leaving children with abusive or neglectful parents instead of rescuing them? Sending them back again and again, telling them if they honor their mother and father as the commandment says and pray hard, their parents will change? If we would still rescue children from abusive parents they only have to endure for 18 years, shouldn't we rescue spouses (and their children) from abusive marriages?
A marriage is supposed to represent the relationship between Christ and the Church. If it's a misrepresentation, what's more harmful to the institution of marriage: ending that relationship or continuing to call such a misrepresentation a marriage?
In the beginning, no tissue in the human body was meant to become cancerous. God hates cancer, I'm sure. Does that mean cancer doesn't exist? Should we not try to remove it before it kills the person?
Marriage is until death. The human soul is eternal. Should we risk an eternal soul to preserve a temporal relationship?
Can a marriage become an idol keeping you away from God?
Just some thoughts as a person unofficially separated for 6 years from someone who is nice but is missing whatever part runs marriage software. Someone who wanted a wife but didn't realize that meant he was supposed to be a husband. And simply cannot be one.
you don´t need to divorce if he hits you ... you need to get away and protect yourself... Let God take vengence... God will not divorce us is we sin... but we must not walk continually in sin... we would not be saved anyway if we are doing this so you can´t lose salvation if you don´t have it. Forgive and bless the abusive husband... protect yourself against him... pray for his salvation every day... don´t give up there are no impossible cases or lost causes. As far as it is with in your power live at peace. God loves your husband and wants to see him saved and delivered. God really really loves you so much.
@@alicia4him1 An abused spouse isn't God. And what is wrong with divorce in such a case? You talk as if divorce is a sin. It isn't, or Deuteronomy 24 would have said something very different. Sometimes it's best to cut off the relationship once and for all. If he repents, great. But that doesn't mean the consequences go away.
If your spouse violates the marital vows, you have every right to seek relief up to and including divorce - regardless of any prospect for repentance. Don't let any of those marriage permanence heretics tell you any different.
If it was sin in 2000 BC, it's sin today. If it was lawful (not sin) in 2000 BC, it's lawful today. Basic morality never changes.
1. It appears that the perpetrator of the divorce does not have the right to remarriage Mark 10:10.
2. 1 Cor 7 seems to indicate that the innocent victim of the divorce ie , adultery , abandonment , has the right to one second chance.
I have a question. What about physical abuse in a marriage, should the abused partner remain in such union?
I think the first thing you should do is separate as soon as possible because your safety is at risk. Second I think we should understand that if someone is abusing someone then obviously the abuser is under a spirit. So I think that we should focus on that spirit and fight to get rid of it. Praying and fasting on behalf of your spouse does work like God said you become one flesh. But to divorce and remarry I don't believe that is so. I'm not saying go be with them after some time now do what the holy Spirit tells you to do as far as keeping yourself safe. But there are other ministries that we could concentrate on that brings glory to the father.
I hope this helps but if anyone is in abusive relationship get out as soon as possible leave and get help
@@tekajohnson3514 amen... stay married ... keep safe ... separated... keep praying and don't give up on your spouses restoration to the Lord and then back to you.
This is a very weighty matter please cover the issue exhaustively.
czcams.com/video/WDEBz25lGdY/video.html
czcams.com/video/MjyW7DrHV5E/video.html
You think they are free to remarry is different from knowing or speculating throughout this video. There is no such thing as divorce in the entire bible.It is man made.Exception clause was meant for the Jews in their time and that was before marriage and it was referring to fornication.When you fornicate you are not married.When you commit adultery you are married.So fornication is before marriage.Either you reconcile with your husband or wife,or remain single.Read Gods word and stop playing around with words.Fear Him.He can throw your soul into Hell for eternity.Life is too short to philosophy around.You do not own your life anymore.God is in control,if not then the devil will rule your life and then you can go and remarry.You will be called an adulterer the rest of your life,the church will look down on you and you will continue to look for a pastor like this man to tell you its ok to remarry and go to Hell.
it is up, to us, to investigate this...
1 Corinthians 7:10-11 KJV
[10] And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband: [11] But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried, or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife.
The Lord Jesus Christ also said let her remain unmarried. Which could also mean the same as the man. Or be reconciled...
Paul clearly says “not I, but the Lord says”
Matthew 19 Jesus Christ also gave a description of why divorce was brought up.
Matthew 19:8 KJV
[8] He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.
It was because of (sin as usual) not forgiving the one who caused the sin. Even in Matthew 19 Jesus Christ also stated this....
Matthew 19:9 KJV
[9] And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.
Some individuals are actually living an adulterous marriage, but are claiming that they are actually being blessed by God.... what?????? It makes no sense...
Can you get a divorce??? Absolutely...
Is it okay??? No, Unless the other spouse actually had sex with a different individual. Then and only then will it fall into the okay category.
My spouse actually told me that she wasn’t happy in our marriage and because God wants her to be happy she could divorce me and marry another... I just looked at her and said good luck with that one... when you actually have sex with a different man let me know... she actually asked me why and I responded... because God will actually bless my second marriage and look at your second marriage as an adulterous marriage....
Trouble is we no longer have homogeneous cultures and value systems
here is not a popularity contest....it matters, little, how many hold a view, what matters is being true to the text....
Well according to the Mosaic law a husband could divorce his wife by rendering some kind of letter normally for some stupid reason, depending on which school of thought. But the Pharisees challenged Jesus with this account. But what did Jesus say....the reason this is so is because you are so hard to teach....and then he goes on about the beginning of the world. Jesus may of acknowledge divorce, but re-marriage is nowhere implied. Paul says you may not be bound by the unbeliever, better to live in peace. He does say that you may re-marry if the other spouse becomes deceased, he doesn’t say that you can re-marry while the other spouse is still alive (this teaching is very foreign to our 21st century ears). If one tries hard enough, the scriptures can be twisted to suit the flavour of the day.
Marie W 777 because marriage is Holy.
@Marie W 777 My answer would be separation. Be single until the idiot makes the first move of moving on then divorce & remarry. Matthew 19: 9. I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery."
We all fall short for the glory of God. The church in her wisdom understands our fallen nature and for this reason allows a divorced person to remarry depending on the circumstances. The church obviously won't tolerate someone marrying 10 times for example.
Jesus commands the divorced to remain unmarried or be reconciled in 1 Corinthians 7:11.
Ferz N
You need to use KJV. It says fornication. Before marriage. Rightly divide the word and you will realize that Matthew is a gospel pertaining to Jewish ears. Mark 10 KJV ONLY is answers on remarriage
How could you totally ignore the last phrase in Matthew 5:32? "But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, AND WHOEVER MARRIES A DIVORCED WOMAN COMMITS ADULTERY." Agreed that adultery is grounds for permitting divorce, but the scripture is so clear that you cannot marry a divorced person.
Luke 16:18 agrees: “Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries a woman divorced from her husband commits adultery.
Romans is explicit that this is in place while the ex-spouse lives, but that it ends when the ex-spouse dies. Romans 7:2-3 "For a married woman is bound by law to her husband while he lives, but if her husband dies she is released from the law of marriage. (3) Accordingly, she will be called an adulteress if she lives with another man while her husband is alive. But if her husband dies, she is free from that law, and if she marries another man she is not an adulteress."
pres. joe married a devoiced woman an her ex is still alive. joe is friends with him. the church of rome still gives him the body an blood.. is this worng? i was married 1 . she took me to court to dissolution . i didnt even go to the court.. i was free.. i married again a young unmarried girl.. she left me again. an took me to court. i didnt go.. im free.. i will not marry again .ill stay alone because of the kingdom of god an living forever is more on the top of my list.. i am happy an alone..both of my wives lied to me broke their own words..an married again an again..
Dan, please read my comment about Joseph and Mary... actually divorce is not permitted bcz of adultery... only if there is fornication which in the time of Jesus in Israel a couple engaged were considered husband and wife even though they had not had a wedding yet and come together. soooo if during their engagement...one if unfaithful... then they can get a divorce. Joseph used the word divorce about Mary thinking she had committed fornication. so you see there is no escape clause and like you said no remarriage... We must read the Bible understanding the times and place it was written.
@@alicia4him1 Hi Alice, thanks for your reply. While I agree that divorce is the same word used "to put away" a betrothal as a marriage, it cannot be the case here in Matt 5:32. This is becomes the one who puts away his wife makes her commit adultery. This is not true of breaking a betrothal because she is free to marry. It is only true of divorcing a spouse. Do you agree?
So what if the believer commits adultery and deserts the marriage? By that time has that believer become an unbeliever, thus freeing the other spouse? This is what I’m hearing.
Sylvia Leads
Read 1 Corinthians 7.
HelloSomebody I have. Im interested in understanding this brother’s take.
Then you don't love yr neighbor not even God, you are hypocritical
not under bondage is not akin to not being bound...
I thought if the unbelievers departs you were ment to reconcile or remain single?
I've been married three times. Can I go to heaven? The two divorced me without cause other than they "fell out of love". Am I doomed here? Help!
If you're a man, there's no scripture that says you can't have more than one wife so don't worry about it however it does disqualify you from being an Elder, Bishop Deacon...
you're not going to hell
Do you hate your father and mother? That is a "command" of Jesus! (Luke 14:26) Or maybe the Bible is not meant to be a legal document! Interpretation of context and meaning is most important.
Yes you can go to heaven. “And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in His Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.” (1 John 5:11-13)
Jesus paid the price for our sin on the cross. His blood cleanses us from sin. Keep your faith and trust in Him for salvation. Pray for the Holy Spirit to reveal to you areas of your life ripe for repentance, and He will reveal them to you.
God bless you.
@@FruitOfTheSpirit thank you brother. I feel like the holy spirit is taking me on a memory trip of things I need to repent for. Things I haven't thought about in years and things I never really felt guilty about or sorry for doing. I gotta be honest it's about put me in a depression the guilt I feel. For what used to feel like no big deal, little white lies or whatever now make me physically sick to think about. I'm convinced I'm forgiven but when will the guilt ease up?
if you are not with your covenant spouse, then you are in adultery...
What about this?
1 Corinthians 7:39 King James Version (KJV)
The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord.
Yes. The marital Covenant is indeed for life. Marriage as explained by Paul speaking on Authority of and from divine revelation of Jesus Christ Himself says in Ephesians 5 that marriage is a mirror of Christ and His bride (the church) and Jesus NEVER divorces His bride.
@@philarevolutionarywarriorp8295 God Divorcer Israel
@@RyanREAX Only figuratively. Read Jeremiah chapter 3. He divorces her but 6 verses later claims DESPITE THAT DIVORCE he is STILL MARRIED to her. Thus keeping in line with His Word from Genesis 2:24 through and up to Mark 10:9 that Only DEATH breaks the marital Covenant. Study it friend. May the Mighty Holy Spirit lead you to Truth 🙏
@@philarevolutionarywarriorp8295 thanks brother, what about Corinthians 7-14 and 7-15 though?
That applies to widows and the never married. 7:15 says that if a spouse departs, let them go(separate) Never says divorce OR that remarriage is allowed. Also, it cant mean divorce bc it would contradict 7:10-11, AND 7:39 which come Before and After it in the same chapter. Also- Romans 7:1-3 confirm almost word for word 1 Corinthians 7:39. The full consensus of scripture supports the marital Covenant is for life and only death breaks it. Good question. God bless. THE LORD is close to those who seek him in Truth. 😊
What if you came to faith after the divorce?? I have to be alone forever?
What if someone is just coming into the faith? Does his past sins prevent him for cleaving to a women of faith?
I'm curious about this exactly
Marriage is a covenant not a contract
Yeeep and god never said death ends a marriage LOL that’s all Catholic bs that’s been saturated into churchs
Some people think that if an 18 year old woman gets married, and gets divorced at 19, she should remain unmarried for the rest of her life.
DEEZVIC maybe she shouldn’t. Why do you care?
Jesus said it . when this situation happen ( it happen to men too) Jesus also said to look for God and his kingdom first and everything else will be added (things that we need, not necessary what we want. ) Being faithful to God will provide the way to endurance anything. your life will be full of blessing.
I think she should or go back with her husband. We have to remember God's ways are not our ways his thoughts are not our thoughts. Remember when Adam sin in the garden God said you will surely die and our flesh was cursed to death. So that's the problem the flesh controlling the flesh desires. When you say remain alone you're basically just saying not able to have sex. so sex becomes a main priority. But no amount of sex should equal to your soul going to hell it's not worth it. Marriage is a ministry that glorifies God. When she got married she didn't just make a covenant with him she made it before God who was in heaven. So my opinion is focus on a different ministry that brings God's glory. Fast and pray on behalf of your spouse because God said you're one flesh. Jesus is a prime example he is the groom coming back for his bride do you think that Jesus would divorce US.
That's also why He said count the cost .. His standards are not easy.
Well some people is perfectly fine being alone : nuns. I want to follow Jesus and Paul. So im okay being single
Question . In view of 1 Corinthians 7:10 . . . "a wife must not leave her husband" but a christian wife does in fact divorce her husband for "non-biblical" reasons , should she be considered an unbeliever such as is found in 1 Corinthians 7:15?
just another excuse, for divorce and remarriage...
@@philipbuckley759 “Thanks” (sarcastically)for spreading miss information to people that are sincerely looking for answers. Mr buckley. I will never respond to you again
Question that’s not answered: does it mean that divorcee people especially when adultery involved and those people abstain from remarriage are not saved?
Pretty reasonable
That's the problem. It's reasonable but not scriptural.
You think they are free to remarry is different from knowing or speculating throughout this video. There is no such thing as divorce in the entire bible.It is man made.Exception clause was meant for the Jews in their time and that was before marriage and it was referring to fornication.When you fornicate you are not married.When you commit adultery you are married.So fornication is before marriage.Either you reconcile with your husband or wife,or remain single.Read Gods word and stop playing around with words.Fear Him.He can throw your soul into Hell for eternity.Life is too short to philosophy around.You do not own your life anymore.God is in control,if not then the devil will rule your life and then you can go and remarry.You will be called an adulterer the rest of your life,the church will look down on you and you will continue to look for a pastor like this man to tell you its ok to remarry and go to Hell.
@@glendike5843 God divorced Israel...then reclaimed (forgiveness & reconciliation even after unfaithfulness)
@@RyanREAX then said He was still her husband in Jeremiah 3:14.
@@ajlouviere202 thats awesome, ill edit my post.
You presented 5 different views!! and I am unclear about the one you recommend as being scripturally accurate! pff !
he did.....divorce and remarriage for sexual immorality and desertion....thus remarriage would be permitted, in these two cases...
@@philipbuckley759 wrong, Phillip. His unconditional absolute in Luke 16:-8 tells you that. It tells you Christ’s seeming exception in Matthew 19:19 is not an exception, per se. It’s only a statement of fact.
Remember, Matthew 19 and Mark 10 are recording the same event, the same exchange between Jesus and the Pharisees, only different things that are actually said, like two students remembering different critical statements in a professor’s lecture. But ALL they remember was actually said. What does that tell us? That tells us that, later in the house, when the disciples asked Him about the question of divorce and remarriage again, He clarified what He told the Pharisees. In what way?
Well, you tell me?
10 In the house the disciples began questioning Him about this again. 11 And He *said to them, “Whoever [a]divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her;
Goodnight and may God bless and protect His own.
@@michaelmakinney20 what about Corinthians 7-14 and 15?
@@michaelmakinney20 what if the wife divorced the husband due to adultery, and the husband does not get married again, but the wife does? Is that still wrong?
@@retrovcr777 the wife commits adultery, with whosoever marries her, according to Matthew 5:32.
To put away is not equal to divorce.
words have to have a context to define....and being set up next to the term mochia...sp....or adultery should limit the range of meanings....
marriage is for life, Phillip. But why? Well, when Jesus said, “Consequently, they are no longer two but one flesh,” Matthew 19:6, He meant it. And Leviticus tells us that “the life of the flesh is in the blood,” Leviticus 17:12. So, it is a covenant/ sacrament of God that ends when blood stop glowing through the veins of one of the two.
God is likely speaking to me. I just had a conversation yesterday with the members of my church about a member who is divorced and remarried. One person has already left communion with us because of him. I don't want to abandon a wonderful brother from whom I've learned a lot, but if he is in unrepentant sin this seems unavoidable. Dr. Schreiner's teaching here surprises me. He says his is the "traditional Protestant view" but i thought the traditional view was much more restrictive. At any rate this seems like more than a coincidence.
The traditional view he mentioned was the more restrictive one. It saddens me that so many will entertain constant debate on matters that scripture makes very clear. The only "out" is given to the courting couple and to the believer who is tied to an unbeliever. And even then the believer is not given the right to initiate the separation. That alone shows Gods view on this matter which always leads to a greater reason. God doesn't arbitrarily command things on a whim. There are very specific consequences for going against Gods direction whether we realize it or not. I find it difficult to believe that anyone who has truly found their soulmate would need to hear this. The joining of souls that takes place for 2 people when brought together by God is an experience unlike any you've ever had and will ever have again. It is a true curse in this life to move on from your true love just to be with someone for carnal or emotional reasons.
Jonathan Darnel you have the proper understanding of those who are unrepentant within the church.
"9I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators: 10Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world. 11But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat. 12For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within? 13But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person" (1 Corinthians 5:9-13).
Do you trust this couple is forgive by grace or by their works? What does God say about them? I suggest you look to the Bible and see the work of the Cross. Don’t let people twist the scriptures in order to put you in the bondage of legalism. Those that left their side likely have hearts that sin as well. All humans do. Thankfully Christ took on the fullness of our sin and now we are FREE. This freedom releases us from the bondage to the law (i.e condemnation and death). We are FREE to obey under the law of grace.
@@kevincox1459 answer this question: is the wife in Matthew 5:31-32 guilty of fornication?
AJ Louviere are you guilty of lust in your heart? Were you saved by works of the Law or by grace through faith?
Galatians 2:16 “yet we know that a person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ, so we also have believed in Christ Jesus, in order to be justified by faith in Christ and not by works of the law, because by works of the law no one will be justified.”
And what is repentance in this situation? Divorce? Or have you not read that Divorce is sin as well?
The only unforgivable sin is blasphemous of the holy ghost
False! All unrepentant sins are unpardonable. If you are in a remarriage when your first covenant spouse is living, it is called adultery according to Jesus. To repent, you must confess and forsake the sins.
Your right i am divorced and know that i cant remarry. Its not easy but hell is forever.
@@nestea1278 Say a person has been divorced to due to adultery. Can that person get married to someone else even if their last spouse is still alive? And if you answer this question can you please provide scripture to back up your claim? I’m just curious, and want to know what is ok to do, or not because the Bible is not very clear to me on this specific situation.
@@retrovcr777 The bible is clear about divorce and remarriage but it depends on the bible version you read. Yes I know that the KJV can be challenging to read but it's the most accurate Bible. Here are some other versions of the bible I would recommend: American Standard version, Revised Standard version. I would use these versions along with the KJV to help with understanding.
There are no grounds for divorce, if you are ALREADY married. So no, a person already married CANNOT divorce their spouse and marry a new person for any reason. God says to do this is adultery. It's adultery because the only thing that ends a marriage covenant is death. A marriage covenant is when you make a vow to a person to be their wife or husband and when the marriage is consummated, the covenant is sealed, it cannot be undone. God is a witness of all vows and promises we make to each other and to Him.
Genesis 2, Deuteronomy 22, Malachi 2 (*14 but read the whole chapter), Matthew 1:18-25, Matthew 5, Matthew 19, Mark 10, Luke 16, Romans 7:2-3, 1 Corinthians 7 (*39-but read the whole chapter).
@@retrovcr777 the divorce and remarriage for adultery doctrine is based solely on the supposed guilt of the wife in Matthew 5:32 and 19:9. However, the wife, in the above scriptures, is clearly not guilty of fornication because the Jews (that Jesus was speaking to) were still living under the law, and if fornication was discovered, there was a moral obligation to report the offender according to Deuteronomy 22:13-24. The wife, who would have been found guilty of fornication, was subsequently stoned to death, according to the law, which had still governed the Jews up until Christ's death on the cross. The same for a woman caught in adultery, according to Leviticus 20:10. How could a wife, guilty of fornication, or adultery, under the law of Moses, be given a writing of divorcement and be caused to commit adultery with whosoever marries her, that is divorced? Jesus is clear, in these examples, that the wife is not guilty of fornication, but is still caused to commit adultery if she marries another man now that she is divorced. This is the only way that Matthew 5:31-32, and Matthew 19:9 keep harmony with Romans 7:2-3, and 1 Corinthians 7:39.
Unlike the synoptic gospels of Mark and Luke, which were written to evangelize the Gentiles, Matthew was written to the Jews, and has of 24 characteristics that identify it as intended for the house of Israel.
The ancient Jews called the betrothed (engaged) "husband" and "wife" according to Deuteronomy 22:23-24, Matthew 1:18-25, and Luke 2:5-7.
Deuteronomy 24:1-4 (Moses's precept of divorce and remarriage) was never for fornication or adultery. Allowing those guilty of fornication and adultery to remain living and become a prospect for remarriage was against the law of Moses in Deuteronomy 22:13-24 and Leviticus 20:10, which commanded that those who were found guilty of fornication and adultery be put away from Israel, and stoned to death.
The law of Moses was not given to the world, only to the Jews. From the exodus, to Christ's death on the cross, the law of Moses governed the Jewish people. Christ's death on the cross caused the Jews to become dead to the law of Moses, so they could be joined to Christ under a New Covenant. This is what Jesus's fulfillment of the law of Moses, including Deuteronomy 24:1-4 (Moses's precept of divorce and remarriage), means. Paul gave several warnings to Christian believers against keeping the ordinances of law of Moses as justification, over following Christ and his commands under the New Covenant with Christ. Keeping the ordinances of the law is no longer possible, for Israel, and that is why Christ prophesied that the temple would be destroyed. These scriptures make it clear that if you choose the law over Christ, that you must keep the whole law: Romans 7:4, Galatians 3:1-9, Galatians 3:10-29, Galatians 4:1-7, Galatians 4:21-31, and Galatians 5:1-15.
Being unequally yoked to unbelievers is not a cause for divorce, once two become one-flesh in a covenant of marriage, according to 1 Corinthians 7:12-14. Many one-flesh covenant marriages between unbelievers are recognized by God in the scriptures, most notably the marriage covenants between Herodias and King Herod's brother Philip, Potiphar and his wife, Ahab and Jezebel, and Ruth to her deceased husband Mahlon by Boaz when he took her to be his wife.
Some are teaching that 1 Corinthians 7:15 implies that those who are abandoned, by an unbelieving spouse, are "no longer bound" in a one-flesh covenant of marriage. The reason this is in conflict is due to the way some translations word it, which gives it an entirely different meaning, and context. 1 Corinthians 7:15, says, "But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so. In such cases the brother or sister is not enslaved. God has called you to peace." As you can see, the actual scripture says "not enslaved" which means that the husband or wife is not enslaved to sin with the unbelieving spouse, and is free to worship Christ in peace. Subsequent translations have changed the words to imply that they nullify the marriage covenant, which is not at all the case. The issue that this creates is with 1 Corinthians 7:10-11, which says, "10To the married I give this command (not I, but the Lord): A wife must not separate from her husband. 11But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband. And a husband must not divorce his wife." As you can see, those who claim 1 Corinthians 7:15 shows the Apostle Paul giving those who are abandoned permission to remarry, do not understand the command that Christ gives is to an abandoned husband, in 1 Corinthians 7:11, and that he "must not divorce" his wife, and his wife is commanded to "remain unmarried or else be reconciled" to her husband. The theory that 1 Corinthians 7:15 nullifies two as being one-flesh, due to one's unbelief, puts the Apostle Paul directly at odds with Christ, and himself, by implying that Paul has issued an opposing command to verses 10-14 in verse 15.
Some also teach that 1 Corinthians 7:27-28 is referring to both divorced men and virgin women, and not exclusively to men and women (virgins) who have never been married. This has been falsely taught for some time in churches as referring to anyone who is not currently in a marriage, which, for them, also includes those who are divorced. This is a very false assumption, and puts these verses in a different context, that is at odds with both the teachings of Christ and the apostle Paul. We see Paul refer to virgins, which signifies the unmarried who have never before been wed, which is the proper context here. We see Paul saying clearly that it is good for virgins, which is also speaking to never before wed men here, "that it is good for a man so to be." He goes on to say, "Art thou bound unto a wife? seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife? seek not a wife." Who is he referring to here? Men who, like himself, have never married. The word "bound", in these verses, is a clear reference to betrothal (engagement) and not to a one-flesh covenant of marriage. The ancient Jews were considered bound as husband and wife during the betrothal (espousal/engagement) before becoming one-flesh in a covenant of marriage, through consummation. This is affirmed by the context of the term "bound" seen in Numbers 30:14-16.
The Jewish couples in ancient Israel, who were betrothed (engaged) were also bound together until death, either by execution for fornication, or by other causes. Then Paul says, "But and if thou marry, thou has not sinned", which is who? The men who had never married in the congregation at Corinth. So he begins with verses 25-26 speaking exclusively to men that have never married. Paul then says, "and if a virgin marry, she hath not sinned", which is speaking directly in regard to virgin women who have never been married, within the congregation, not divorced women. Notice that verse 34 says, "There is difference also between a wife and a virgin. The unmarried woman careth for the things of the Lord, that she may be holy both in body and in spirit: but she that is married careth for the things of the world, how she may please her husband." Paul speaks plainly when he says "there is a difference between a wife and a virgin." Paul goes on to say, "But if any man think that he behaveth himself uncomely toward his virgin, if she pass the flower of her age, and need so require, let him do what he will, he sinneth not: let them marry." This is speaking of a virgin who has become of age to bear children when it says, "let them marry." This is a clear command, to a single man, who has taken a virgin to be his wife. Paul then says, "Nevertheless he that standeth stedfast in his heart, having no necessity, but hath power over his own will, and hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin, doeth well." This is referring again to the single man who decides it is better not to marry, but to stay betrothed (engaged), under the present distress, by saying that he "hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin." Paul then says, "So then he that giveth her in marriage doeth well; but he that giveth her not in marriage doeth better", which again means single men, in the congregation, who have betrothed a wife, do well if they marry, and those who choose not to marry their virgin brides do better, under the current climate. For more proper context of the word "bound", let's look further down in this chapter to verse 39, which says, "39The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord" (1 Corinthians 7:39). For so long, these scriptures, between verses 25-38, have been twisted and used to enable divorce and remarriage, by wayward churches and teachers, and have caused many to stumble and to be trapped in unscriptural unions.
The use of the woman at the well, in regard to marriage, falsely implies that Christ was endorsing remarriage after a divorce. This teaching is in defiance of Matthew 22:23-28, which shows a woman who had been widowed seven times, and entered into each subsequent marriage without any scriptural conflicts with God's law of marriage (one-flesh covenant) seen in Genesis 2:23-24.
Mark 10:1-12 and Matthew 19:1-12 both record Christ's teaching that day beyond the Jordan. There is no mention of the words "fornication", "writing of divorcement", or "divorced" in Mark's Gospel because Mark was not written to the Jews (as Matthew's Gospel was), but to evangelize the Romans, and likewise Luke to evangelize the Greeks, who had no knowledge of the law of Moses in Deuteronomy 22 or Deuteronomy 24. All of these facts draw a clear understanding that remarriage after a divorce, under the New Covenant with Christ, is a scripturally false and baseless teaching. Please use wisdom when living in any situation against what the scriptures command.
I have an honest question. If one is divorced without Biblical grounds, and they get remarried, are they living in adultery or is there forgiveness and the Lord will consider the marriage that they are now in? I know repentance is to admit what they did was sin, and after admitting then there has to be a turning away from that sin..So, if one genuinely repents, does that not mean they have to turn away from the marriage that they are now in? I hope this question made sense and someone can give me wisdom on this matter…
I personally believe god sees it as a continuous cycle of adultery
Ok!! My husband cheated on me for years, made 2 more families and when i confront him he beat me half to death, i was choked until i travel in a light and, i shouted at god to help me, then i return, to this day i can't figure out what type of forgiveness is to be given to him. Please someone advise me ❤
any illicit sexual activity, by a married couple is adultery, not sexual immorality....
adultery is sexual immorality. Any sex other than sex within a marriage is sexual immorality.
My wife married twice 1st abusive 2 nd husband a cheater ! I pray 🙏🏽 God has mercy on our souls
What God has joined together let no man separate. Many have divorced and remarried and are in a constant state of mortal sin.
Amen
What if your husband abandoned me? He doesn’t even want to reconcile, must I reman alone?
Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.”
Matthew 19:8-9
For certain things, we need to use common sense.
But that is not obedience to the scriptures.
AJ Louviere the scriptures state we are free from the law, so be careful when you start quoting laws, Pharisee.
@@jtfike I think the scriptures are clear about judging others.
@@jtfike yes the scriptures also say that the Jews were made dead to the law by the body of Christ. If you know this to be true, then why do you advocate keeping Moses's precept of divorce and remarriage in Deuteronomy 24:1-4?
@@ajlouviere202 yes, they are. And judgement comes with a sentence. So perhaps you should use Webster's dictionary a tad more? Discernment is different than judgment and we are certainly encouraged to use it.
I’m married to a man that was married once before me and we are now divorcing. Would I be able to remarry one day if that was an option?
I would say yes, from what I see in the scriptures.
Read what the bible defines as marriage. Marriage is two becoming one flesh. When one of these two becomes one with a third person, how can the two be still of one flesh? Divorce (or right to remarry) is appropriate when your spouse has committed adultery but not for other reasons. Separation is the remedy for abuse.
This is just my opinion but I think you were never married in the first place he was married cuz his spouse was still alive. You two were in a adulterous relationship
@@shadowmist1246 He’s definitely committed adultery
@@ashjade86Who are you talking about? Adultery against his first wife or against you?
I've read and read, haven't seen anything about remarriage. I've seen a lot of people translate loosely to absolve themselves. Following the Bible shouldn't be hard or painful.