Andy Goldstein Feels EMBARRASSED Listening To Howard Webb On The Everton Vs Forest VAR Decisions! đđŹ
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 29. 04. 2024
- Darren Bent & Andy Goldstein discuss Howard Webb's comments on the Nottingham Forest Vs Everton VAR decisions.
Subscribe: / talksport
Enjoyed this CZcams video? đ
đ„ïž talkSPORT's Website: talksport.com/
đČ talkSPORT's Twitter: / talksport
đ· talkSPORT's Instagram: talksport?...
đ€ talkSPORT's Facebook: / talksport
đ± talkSPORT's Tik Tok: / talksport
đŽ Download the talkSPORT app HERE! - talksport.com/apps/
đ Want to see if you feature on our CZcams channel? Check out our Best talkSPORT callers playlist: âą The BEST talkSPORT Cal...
#talksport
#var
#nottinghamforest
#everton
#premierleague - Sport
Feels like entire season has match fixing written all over it.
The Premiership is a corrupt cartel!
Every single game..joke season
I donât think they match fix as such but they influence games. To be fair I think it was a penalty but as an Everton fan we have had some absolute howlers all season. Forrest got away with less than half the points of Everton for more than double overspend. The premier league want drama it helps their brand and viewership.
How is it match fixing when theyâve wanted Everton to go down all season?!?
The referees have no fear whatsoever of Howard Webb; they know there will be no consequences for their actions. He needs to resign ASAP.
if they punished/removed referees ever time they made a mistake, we wouldn't have any football matches. A bigger issue for me is that there is a massive double standard with fouls inside vs outside the box. It's so so easy to give fouls for the softest, most predictable things outside the box (think Grealish or defenders shielding the ball then just falling to the ground), but as soon as it's inside the box, the severity has to be much higher.
"Would that be a foul anywhere else on the pitch?"
Sacking the best refs is not gonna make things better as all you will do is promote worse refs. Eventually I will get to refs games
@@rishbademha It is possible to have consequences short of a sacking. At this point, the expectation is there is no error so grievous that we actually expect anyone to be taken off the PL rotation at all. Taken off rotation for a week is rare as hen's teeth.
@@rishbademha But they're clearly more afraid of making decisions against the 'bigger' clubs, afraid of the club's response, afraid of the media, yet make decisions against 'smaller' clubs, just to show they're doing their job. Same with PSR rules, they punish Everton, Forest and Leicester but apparently not City. Nothing against City, as far as I'm concerned they won their trophies on the pitch and should keep them but the uneven treatment stinks. There are other ways to punish clubs rather than taking away points won on the pitch, transfer restrictions is one.
@@thesedreamsarefreeyou really need it explained to you after all these months? Forest and Everton pleaded GUILTY at the first chance for ONE charge and everyone moved on. City have 115 charges and are fighting the charge. I canât believe this still needs to explained to people
Howard webb is embarassing...he thinks were all mugs
The reality is worse, he knows we are all mugs
We are....đ
They are not getting it wrong, it's corrupt, all about money. Football is dead.
Yes it's a fix.....scam season
But if every club thinks they're corrupt against their club, who are they corrupt for?
Money for whom exactly? What's the criteria for which teams they favour then?
Yes decided that a few years ago , I think even some of the games are rigged for TV..
@@Gagefelstead whos the team that doesn't get any bad calls?
The ref got it wrong, but what's worse is that with a perfect camera angle the VAR official was either completely blind or he doesn't know anything about football. He should be sacked for gross incompetence.
Or he's a Luton fan
Or they are cheating.
Or he's a Luton fan
None of them understand football and it's a huge problem.
He's a LUTON FAN !!!
So corruption forest was spot on
Why would there be corruption In a game between forest and Everton? Makes no sense there is definitely corruption In games with the top 6 but not games like Everton forest
@@wolvezy It has nothing to do with Everton Forest its the fact that both Ref and Var was never going to give a pen and lets be homiest two of them was %100 a pen .. So then you have to ask your self what did they have to gain by making the decisions . one you can take two is a joke but three maybe just maybe a Luton fan in the VAR who had something to gain . They have no one to answer to marking their own homework . Not just Forest Everton wolves the list goes on But i bet if that was Man city they would have gotten a pen
Once your above league one the refs are told who to favour in each game. Thats how they can get cup finals etc with the biggest tv appeal.
Itâs not totally match fixing but they enable a team as much as possible for this to happen. Look at recent decisions in that light and youâll see. This comes from a ref btw. Forest have been earmarked for the relegation scrap all season because the owner is far more unpopular than any other team at the bottom.
It is corruption. Taylor, Tierney and rob jones are the worst and most obvious at this. Taylor even smiled and smirked been accused of cheating at forest Newcastle. He heard, he knows and knew there was no camera.
Itâs embarrassing the standards are so poor. And itâs in danger of ruining the best entertainment product in the world
Darren Bent has been a class act since joining the show. Talks so much sense.
I wish He work with jey.
All this AND STILL no one can even suggest corruption....
When you go way past rank incompetence, that leaves only corruption.
Once your above league one the refs are told who to favour in each game. Thats how they can get cup finals etc with the biggest tv appeal.
Itâs not totally match fixing but they enable a team as much as possible for this to happen. Look at recent decisions in that light and youâll see. This comes from a ref btw. Forest have been earmarked for the relegation scrap all season because the owner is far more unpopular than any other team at the bottom.
It is corruption. Taylor, Tierney and rob jones are the worst and most obvious at this. Taylor even smiled and smirked been accused of cheating at forest Newcastle. He heard, he knows and knew there was no camera.
Itâs embarrassing the standards are so poor. And itâs in danger of ruining the best entertainment product in the world
Mutual engagement đ normal contact đ, young came straight through the back of player, and never touched the ball. Corrupt
Not only that he had his arm locked around Hudson Odoi's elbow.
Stuart Attwell is either completely incompetent or did it on purpose.
They scrubbed the recording to erase Atwell singing âWe are Luton ..â and chanting âThereâs only one Ross Barkleyâ before making his corrupt decisions.
He certainly is incompetent - or he may be putting straight a complete balls-up he made by disallowing a goal in Everton's first game of the season.
The worst part is you hear the ref shouting 'he got the ball' when he clearly didn't đ how has VAR not seen that! They need to get rid of the clear & obvious error part as well, if it's a foul it's a foul!
so forest were right in there opinion but still be fined ....bullshit
It amazes me how most people won't talk about football being corrupt,wherever there's money there's corruption,betting on football is huge,we see crazy decisions but there's no way it's corruption, that's crazy to me
Because none of you that claim corruption can back it up with anything tangible to explain why its corrupt, who is responsible for the corruption and how they decide where the corruption is going to be used
@@magikarpsplashy you're right I have no tangible evidence,but common sense tells me with all the money and power involved there's obviously corruption especially when we see the crazy decisions that are made that affect games,I tell you what tho you can play the guitar palđ
@@carlcarter8799 but my argument is who exactly corrupts it? Every team gets shocking decisions against them. Every team gets some for them. All the evidence really shows is that referees don't really have a clue what the rules are or how they're meant to implement them.
@@magikarpsplashy I don't know who is exactly behind it ,it could be crime,government,the real people that run government's (the so called elites)
As sad as this is and I have no evidence but I think it's 2 fold the Premier league loves all the conversation and story's around var decisions as it generates clicks and money and therefore keeps the Premier League at the top of algorithms across all platforms and that generate more eyes on their product also as the original poster hints at and is definitely happening in some shape would be in game match betting with syndicates in Asia, just think of all the other sports who have had issues with betting and peds but never anything in football seems odd
The fact that a club could be relegated on the back of this shambles is disgusting.
In fairness forest are shite regardless of the decision
If you get relegated it's not because of this game.
Premier League is played over 38 games, not 1 decision.
Cup competitions can be lost due to a refereeing error. For the league, you finish where you deserve.
â@@Camden0800ahhh remember the good old days without var wouldnt need to point this out to the idiots đ
It's not just 1 game, just search for a montage of bad decisions against forest this season already from refs.
Total shambles. The ref said Young played the ball so the two VAR assistants should be checking if he got the ball. He didnât so thatâs your clear error.
Absolutely right, and it is a pile of horse manure that obfuscation Howard Webb comes up with there, because the ref didn't decline the penalty on the grounds of not forceful enough contact he denied the penalty on the grounds that he (the defender) got the ball. If he was disabused of that erroneous belief he may well have given a penalty and I very firmly believe it was one. It would be too much for Webb to admit that they got at least two wrong. Instead he's comes up with an alternative reason why it wasn't a penalty but not the reason the ref gave.
100% correct. That is the only thing they needed to look for and they missed it.
I couldnât believe my eyes watching that Everton v Forest game,it was corruption right in front of our eyes and they got away with it and will continue to until every club takes a stand against the premier league and the PGMOL
Howard Webb the awarder of so many penalties to Fergie's Man U
Brings the whole history of the Premier league into disrepute
He is the core of the problem.
EXACTLY đŻ
Attwell did everything possible not to give the penalty. Whether its incompetence, unconscious bias or whatever, his language and the phrases he used scream he didn't want to give it.
Bundesliga use it and don't have the issue we seem to be having. Tbh there must be corruption to not see it was a penalty.
Var isnt the problem - it is the match officials
As a Forest fan we have been wronged in so many games. Corruption at its best.
We all stand with you, this has to end.
Every game apart from two maybe three since November. They hate the owner and want us gone. Hopefully he puts the horses head in someoneâs bed and turns their opinion of him round. Or starts flying them first class for holidays to uae like the Bahamians in charge of Man City. Maybe then they wonât have such a vendetta to get us back to the championship
The same ref who inexplicably stopped Cody Gakpo from scoring against West Ham the other day and then made the West Ham keeper go down injured and got the physio on to try and justify him stopping the play....the same ref who was demoted to the Championship earlier this season for a horrendous penalty decision in the Newcastle V Wolves game.....if i could be bothered looking I'm sure i could find many more examples but all this in one season is surely enough to tell us that Anthony Taylor is not competent enough to be a top flight referee.
Seriously. How on earth can they come down hard on Forest after that. It looks dubious & so easy to come to the Forest take on it.
That VAR audio is shocking, something not right.
It's mind boggling
VAR has killed football. Anyone arguing otherwise is deluded. The worst part for me are actually the forensic offside calls. Just give the benefit to the striker. Fans accepted this.
*I HATE Vđ„ïžR* . It has been the worst thing to be introduced to football. The same Monday morning apologies are going to be the order of the day for seaons to come.
100%, the âforensic offside callsâ are the most painful thing Iâve seen come into football, can only hope this VAR plague will destroy itself
VAR has took more out of the game than itâs brought to the game. If we kept goal line technology and maybe semi automated offsides Iâd be happy with that. Give us our beautiful game back
Game's gone and it's never coming back. They've got it now where they can get a decision 100% wrong and the media will protect them and the person that made the decision will be rewarded. You can't question the official and regardless of how many times they get a decision wrong they'll still lie to you and say it's made the game better. It's over.
I don't understand why they used it in the FA Cup when is not used at all lower league grounds
*I HATE Vđ„ïžR* . It has been the worst thing to be introduced to football. The same Monday morning apologies are going to be the order of the day for seaons to come.
Its destroys the immediacy of the sport too. Players dont celebrate the same way anymore, viewers dont celebrate the same, there is a disconnect. Watched Madrid vs Bayern yesterday - no VAR intervention and it was fantastic, so free flowing.
100%. That euphoric feeling when the ball hit the back of the net, that we all lived for, has been dampened so much. I find it really sad. I would rather have the occasional match ruined by a bad decision, than every match ruined by VAR.
Itâs killing football
The rules of the game are not actually designed for a technological binary decision, it's all "in the opinion of the referee" and "seeking to gain advantage" not if the attackers toe is before an imaginary line drawn by a computer.
The VAR team can't possibly be that bad. Not possible if everyone else can see the foul clearly, even without the tech. The only conclusion is that there is something else going on. This is not human error.
Totally agree. And the handball was a penalty too, especially if it was Man City, Arsenal, Liverpool or the likes screaming for a penalty, but because it wasn't a top team and the VAR ref supported Luton, that wasn't a penalty either.
Think of the hundreds of millions of pounds bet on PL games all over the world and there's your answer.
"mutual engagement between both of them before the tackle", so a player can fully wipe someone out from the back ...............
I'm glad that you guys are saying these things. I thought all 3 were penalties based on what I've seen given over the season. Then the PGMOL decides to move the threshold after most of those were given and not tell anyone, that's corruption there.
Yup. PGMOL simply changed the rules in the middle of a contest, and gaslighting anyone who notices. There is not the slightest doubt about softer contact be given earlier in the season.
It simply depends on the team shouting for a penalty. If it's Man City, Arsenal, Liverpool or the likes, it's a penalty. If it's Everton, Wolves, Forest etc it isn't. Total corruption.
@@zig_ziggy Liverpool's Alexis MacAllister getting kicked with studs hard in the chest in the Man Ciry box for a no call is in the running for top 20 refereeing gaffs this season.
Admittedly, the competition for that list is really stiff this season.
If you play it back in 0.25 speed he not only goes through him he has his arm locked around Hudson Odoi's elbow. The VAR failed. Forest are likely to be fined for querying the fact VAR official is a Luton fan (nothing against Luton, they're innocent in this as Forest are. It's not that Attwell is being accused of bias, but it's a fact that he is a Luton fan and those decisions do invite the question of bias. No one is saying he deliberately made wrong calls but in close ones could he be, slightly, involuntarily, tipping that way? Why even invite the possibility? Was it unreasonable for Forest to point it out before the game? It's not the same thing as accusing, just taking no chance. Apart from that VAR stinks. It's made the game all about the officials.
Your being too kind. We would all love a world where the correct call was made by referees with integrity. That Forest have been slammed by the media for raising the matter, shows how deep the corruption has gone. Watch the CZcams highlights of that game in slo-mo and make your own decision on how many penalties VAR should have have called. The last call was corruption, pure and simple.
@@zig_ziggy Yeah, and wow, how some of the media have gone to town about Forest's complaints. If the number of decisions that Forest had go against them this season happened against either Utd or Liverpool then both Neville and Jamie Carragher would be claiming a vendetta against their clubs. Every team gets decisions go against them but it seems to be every game with Forest and they all seem to be big ones, like against Bournmouth, Boly being sent of for a foul on him (PGMOL apologised), against Man U, Joe Worrall gives away penalty and sent off as last man when another player was clearly last man, Ryan Yates fouled in box at home against Everton, clear as daylight, no penalty, against Newcastle keeper brings down Aywoniyi, his whole arm up to his shoulder was under the striker's leg, Williams against West Ham should have had a penalty, the farce against Liverpool when ref stopped game for an injury, Forest had the ball, if that had been inside the box it would be given to the keeper but it was outside box and Forest should have kept it. Liverpool given the ball and went on to score. Then these three bad decisions in one game in which it seems that VAR wasn't even going to look at any of them in detail. If Forest bring up that he's a Luton fan it's true, to ask why someone with an emotional connection to the result is fair, it's not saying he cheated, just saying he shouldn't be there, to avoid the remote possibility he might. I'd rather go back to the days when human error costs games instead of overbearing, self important teams of officials interfering with the flow of the game, taking up time which adds to the pressure, kitchen sink minutes at the end and still getting it wrong!
The Swedish league voted not to introduce VAR, not to remove it.
Donât ask the clubs to vote on scrapping VAR!! ASK THE SEASON TICKET HOLDERS THAT PAY TO WATCH THE GAMES!!
My team Leicester have just got promoted back to the PL, but I will definitely miss VARless Championship football.đą
It's rigged, they are all in a betting syndicate..I don't understand why people say you can't question their integrity, are they not human?
Not often i agree with goldstein but hes spot on her. The referee's involved should be sacked. He doesnt play the ball, its a foul. What on earth are they talking about?
To me that sounds like someone trying to not tell his mate hes got it wrong
They can't sack him they've just said he's one of the 4 best ref's in the UK. Let that sink in. The person who could not see that a person sliding through the back of a player and not even touching the ball was a foul in the penalty area is at least the 4th best referee in the UK. If they sack him they'll only have 3 ref's left. And just to add insult to injury one of those top 3 referee's couldn't see how Declan Rice kicking a player in the groin was a foul. What an absolute state the officiating is in.
Sack someone for a mistake? Guess every player needs sacking as well then.
@@Camden0800 it's corruption, pure and simple. A mistake happens every so often but it's getting to the point where it's literally every game now
@@Camden0800 A referee is entitled to make a mistake in real time. VAR can freeze real time, wind it back, repeat it over and over again. What's the excuse for that?
Not the referees fault, I used to referee and its hard in real time, but when you have the benefit of replay it's supposed to help.
_'To me that sounds like someone trying to not tell his mate hes got it wrong'_
Mike Dean actually admitted he refused to tell Anthony Taylor that Romero had pulled Cucharellos hair because "he was a mate and he'd had a hard game", now refusal to enact the rules whether for friendship or financial gain is the same thing- Corruption, yet no action was taken against Dean.
âIf they canât see anything wrong that last penalty decision, thereâs something seriously wrong with thatâ
No thereâs something seriously âunfit for purposeâ with that Darren. Call it out for what it is.
They should only have the automated offside and goal line technology. Nothing else for var.
I can imagine match fixing syndicates in the Far East are making billions off of the epl.
Young was the last man ,so it was a sending off as well as a penalty
Hasnât been the case for years. If the challenge is for the ball the result canât be a red & penalty.
Only a red card if the foul is outside the box and he is the last man.
@@eddie_1878 Except for Forest then
@@eddie_1878 It wasn't for the ball. It was for the man.
@@josephkerrigan733 no, it was a challenge for the ball.
Tell me why referees when addressing VAR officials always sound like they are trying to influence the decision?
Because its biased rubbish
Because these are not serious professionals, but mates more worried about not embarrassing each other than doing their jobs.
Embarrassing is an understatement đĄđĄđĄđĄđĄ
Finally a media outlet not trying to side with the PGMOL, soften their words, or downplay the errors in the match (and the wider season)
The only thing I ever agreed with Andy on . Just slow it down and get the right decision made . You can say incompetence but for how long until it comes across as corrupt?đ
That VAR analysis is not much better than a couple of fans sitting on the settee with a few beers getting excited about the match. Distinct lack of calm, professional, articulate assessment. Amateurish.
Itâs a result of sub conscious bias. There you go. Mystery solved. Not corruption. Not deliberate. Just sub conscious bias. Thatâs why certain refs donât ref certain games. Itâs common sense. What would be great is if the media commented on all the other INEXPLICABLE errors Forest have suffered leading up to the tweet, which taken in context was an entirely reasonable response. Maybe should have been worded differently. Thatâs it.
Forest and Wolves would both be about 9 points better off this season if the refs had done their jobs properly. The fact Forest could go down because of it leaves a bit of a bad taste tbh
"they come together" LMAO shamesless
Man City has over 100 ffp discrepancies, what is going on, money rules, is Seb and platini running this lot
đ„±
115 charges fc.
gotta say though im impressed with how many different ways they have avoided admitting its rigged lol its literally right in front of our eyes and they wont even accept they made an error lol football is laughable right now
Nah this embarrassing onfield ref doesn't give it because he thought Young played the ball. How does VAR look at that and say he plays the ball? đ€Ł
Also that Ashley Young and when he was playing for them Holgate have previous for horrendous tackles. You'd think he of all people is getting pulled up for this not let off with it. They are bankers for a yellow on par with Casemiro and Romero etc..
What?
Why canât the premier league mike up the refs like they do in the NFL and NBA. Explain the call made. Then no one has to speculate whatâs going on. VAR rules have not been made clear to the fans or even the players and managers.
Because IFAB doesn't allow it. It's nothing to do with the Premier League.
NFL and NBA? đđđđđ
The pgmol wants that but ifab wonât allow it
What difference is listening-in on something you still have no control over is going to make?! The same old Monday morning apology will be the order of the day. That's not "transparency"
The luton fan in the VAR booth did NUFC dirty
Why are pundits everywhere so against talking about corruption? Itâs staring you right in the face!
The pundits are all part of the corruption.
I think there will be severe consequences for both them and the company theyâre working for
We should be aloud to listen to all the var live
The thing i find most hilarious is they are titled as Professional Referee's or do they really mean entitled?
The most hated guy in internet right now.....goes to HOWARD WEBB.
Because they donât want to see it.
the hand ball by young was a definet penalty to
I think you need to say sorry to forest
Forest need to sue the PGMOL for damages. If they lose millions of pounds they might be forced to change, otherwise they will keep doing this
Spot on. Itâs up to little Forest to stand up to the corruption on behalf of football, huge applause to Forest and their supporters for making a fight out of this
Var-se benefits the big teams and the bookies. đ Simple as that.
99% of the football i watch is the PL as a Swedish.
And sure there is missed offsides with 2cm sometimes, a wrong penalty or something for your team here now. You get upset, But you get over it and can understand.
When you watch the PL and there is more wrong each round with VAR, then what is the point?
And to see a goal and know it is a goal, not wait to see if they might find a toe offside, a little nudge by a defender in the build up or what ever.
VAR is truly taking the fun out of it. Weather statistics says it gets more correct or not.
Now referees in PL is just not blowing insteed and just rely on VAR to call for the penalty insteed. (Spurs penalty this weekend prime example of this)
*I HATE Vđ„ïžR* . It has been the worst thing to be introduced to football. The same Monday morning apologies are going to be the order of the day for seaons to come.
"How can they not see this" The VAR was a Luton fan! He did see it, he contrived the outcome. ffs
Forest have therefore been proven correct. Any fine on Forest will not be paid and Forest will take this as evidence. Forest are proving a valuable lesson, stop the bullying and stop the corruption
Going to call it now There is going to be a big VAR call before the end of the season that's going to end with somebody going down massive decision
why not put it on the screen when play is stopped like rugby?
Supposed to be a professional body but it Tayls and Longy. Tells you everything you need to know
Your right Darren, all 3 were pens, and anyone with a little bit of knowledge would know this
Not only killing the great game But making it seem we got the most corrupted refs on the planet You would have to be blind not to see that was a penalty Sack them bring in x footballers
This has made me more angry. How can this be OK????
Well it was ok the previous month when Webb and Owen talked about the City foul in the last seconds against Liverpool last month, Webb needs to resign, he is not fit for the job
Problem is var officials are confused about whether they are referring or reviewing. It needs to be made clear that their job is to review critical incidents and allow ref to make the decisions by reviewing the incident.
Ex players arenât part of the boys club, just in case they go rogue and expose the size of corruption in our once beautiful game
If VAR was scrapped you would still get (occasional?) howlers from refs who were unsighted, but these are ultimately palatable for fans as they (hopefully) even out through the season..itâs so much harder to stomach when blatant & costly errors are made by VAR officials who have unfettered access on a technical level.
The problem with VAR is the consistency. The game needs it but there needs to be a baseline.
Why we haven't established a fixed set of VAR operators at this point is beyond me. I know that there are multiple games every weekend but to not have a baseline means the system by design is flawed.
"Mutual engagement"? What?!!! This is corruption in plain sight.
How have we got exclude axcess to one game? let's get access to all contentious desisions through the season
Ex players shouldn't be allowed in. Can you imagine if people like Rio was in the VAR room? His bias knows no bounds
Why not have it like cricket (where each team has a given number of VAR appeals which they can use for any situation, with their number of appeals remaining intact if they're right)?
That doesnât take the mentally incompetent decisions out of it tho
So you have all your appeals and then a blatantly obvious mistake is made !
Andy saying he asks his wife on incidents to get a impartial view and then later said even his dog gets decisions right đ
Should have a PFA Approved advisor in the VAR room to advise during the matches
And we all thought VAR would get rid of Refereeing incompetence
Use the 2 review system as used in cricket.
Referees and var are all mates that says it all
Iâm not sure what I find most worrying is the idea that the first was put forward the others two decisions are subjective. Does that mean the officials arenât clear on the rules does the players arm stop the ball going to its intended purpose and does he try to get out the way? Answer is no but then to suggest the main incident was a tussle when he has actually tackled the player from behind. It actually cost Forest points as all key incidents affected the game directly. Having read Forest statement which was absurd listening to this doesnât do a lot to persuade you they are wrong.
I dear someone to argue that football is not corrupt. They are being paid off so one team can come out on top.
They shouldn't be asking the clubs they should be asking the fans! It's our hard earned and increasingly scarce money that is supporting the joke that is the EPL. Stop going to games, everyone go to the Championship because the games are way more enjoyable with no VAR. Give the game back to the people who pay for it!
When a decision take so long should stop the clock play 90mins and no injury time. Works in rugby so why not football
Awful to watch the Ref and VAR, feel for Nottingham Forest, donât forget the other two decisions, in my opinion all three were pens
Var isnât the problem, itâs the people in charge of it that are.
The rushing decisions and high bar for over turning the onfield ref is 100% Howard Webb mandates. Its exactly what he said he wanted to do when he got the job.
I feel that VAR should also be used to determine the players minds and thought process too.
VAR is basically job creation for referees...then the referees don't do the job.
Lovely.
like shelf service tills in supermarkets
No....in other words Webb is saying the incident was a sporting incident. Some get given, some wont...go with with the Ref (referees descretion) unless there is a glaring issue....which there wasnt
Purely a legal statement by Webb. He admits to one penalty. Result 2-1. If he admits to 2 or 3 penalties it's 2-2 or even 2-3. If Forest are then relegated by 1-3 points then PGMOL gets sued. Ergo Webb will not be allowed to admit publicly to more than one error.
Webb sense. Young kicks CHO and does not touch the ball, pen. Young kicks Reyna and does not touch the ball, not a pen. Referee signals the ball hits Young's shoulder. A clear error but Attwell says nothing. Webb says no pen. Clearly a mistake by ref. It hits Young on the ARM.
Attwell is clearly not competent to be a VAR and yet will continue. The referee is not competent and yet will continue. Webb is not competent to manage these people. They all need to go.
VAR will only work when the REf requests help Rather than VAR Stepping in and undermining the Ref's confidence for the remainder of the game. Ref to decide ask 'was he offside?' Not have an automatic check looking for reasons.
Why are the only people that can hear the conversations are the commentators and officials. The crowd and Managers should be able to hear what is being said. What are they hiding.
The truth.
I feel embarrassed every time I hear Goldstein on the radio
Please can someone bring up and discuss the idea why the Premier League cannot introduce a "Captains Call" once in each half by each captain to request VAR or the referee to look at the monitor. They do this in cricket and rugby league here is Australia and this very quickly overturns and fixes any bad decisions. Even a Tennis player is granted three unsuccessful challenges per set! This will reduce bad calls and even it all out per game for each team. Please discuss or even better ask the powers above to consider this. Its not rocket science but certainly feels like it currently which is ruining the game.
Forest would be on the beach now if VAR could do it's job.