How US Would Obliterate Iran in War (Hour by Hour)
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 13. 05. 2024
- đ„Tensions skyrocket as Israel and Iran exchange devastating military strikes! After Israel's suspected attack on the Iranian consulate in Syria, Iran retaliates with a massive aerial assault, launching 300 missiles and drones. Most are intercepted, but the stakes are higher than ever. đđ„ The U.S. joins Israel, destroying many Iranian drones and missiles. What could this mean for future U.S.-Iran relations? Dive into our in-depth analysis on the unfolding crisis. #IsraelIranConflict #MiddleEastTension #MilitaryStrike #GlobalSecurity #AerialAssault #WorldNews #DefenseStrategy #IranIsrael #GeopoliticalCrisis #USMilitarySupport #israel #iran #usa #america #navy #redsea #militaryanalysis
#themilitaryshow - VÄda a technologie
This video which is obviously fiction is wishful thinking. US Admirals are not so stupid as to leave capital ships like the Bataan completely exposed to missiles.
And what about the b2s that would have been scrambled and the harm missles to disable their radar? Oh and the cloud of tomahawk and other miscellaneous missles.
This video is as of it's 1975
America is not dependent on the middle East for oil
America exports more oil than it uses.
Whatever decreases to the middle east oil output would only boost USA profits.
Yeah it's an absolute joke in a lot of wishful thinking on some Simps for Iran.
The only possible truth to this video is sleeper agents in this country, cuz we know they've been coming across the border.
But as far as thinking that Iranian ballistic missiles would be able to track and Target us warships, let alone get through their missile defenses is absolutely hilarious
So USA will not first take out all Iranian Radars, air defences , any ship that is floating, all planes , Submarines and all military installations ? Iran will only be left with underground missiles Tanks and Guns before USA comes into Iran.
â@@Wyomingchief
Know. AKA imagine.
This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard
Next to your name.....
It is definitely up there, that's for sure.
Yes its stupid Cruise missiles and bombings from Jets and stealth bombers and B 52s
Who wrote this script, Iran? LOL
For context last time Iran tried to fight the American military straight up, it lost half its Navy in 8 hours, since then in the 80âs the Iranians are basically flying the same aircraft, what does that tell you?
Yeah, I stopped watching after this fantasy war reached four weeks.
By then Iran would be begging for peace.
â@@1981mensoand for food đ
â@@1981mensoDIY watch the little bit longer but when they made the comment that the Iranian sank over a dozen us warships I couldn't stop laughing.
â@@1981menso
US regime is too weak to harm Iran
â@@1981menso 2xlosers always omit Roberts and Stark vs 2 Iranian speed boats and a village boghammer LOL
Iran is the angry drunk guy with one fist
US win battles but lost wars
The US is high on fentanyl right now.
Correction.. Both the Nimitz and the Fold class aircraft carriers can carry more than 90 aircraft on board.. Not 60 and 75+.. Basically 4 carrier battle groups have more aircraft than 95% of the countries world wide...
Thatâs absolutely true. I donât know if youâve served on a carrier or in an air wing squadron, but usually carriers will have somewhere around 50 planes with them. Give or take a few of course. Sometimeâs theyâll have 60 or so too. Ninety is definitely possible, but logistically itâs a lot more demanding to have all those planes and the crew to repair and do all the maintenance stuff along with having the equipment to be able to do repairs or just PMâs. As well as fuel but thatâs not usually too big of an issue if youâve got a whole strike group supporting you. đȘ
But if we were in a no đ© war, and it was necessary to have that kind of need for aircraft, then weâd throw whatever we have at them. This video gives Iran a bit more credit then it rates as far as military power is concerned.
The Bataan wouldnât sink. America once tried to sink a retired kitty hawk class aircraft carrier and they shot it with missles, torpedos, guns shells and they couldnât sink it! They had to get on the ship and use bombs to finally sink it! And thatâs not gonna happen.
Oh I got even more hilarious, they claimed by 3 months that the US had lost over a dozen warships sank. Absolutely hilarious
You talk about "Iran responding" as if having military leaders on a consulate in Lebanon plotting attacks on Israel is just normal and okay.
Israel could have handled it according to UN law instead of acting invincible and committing none stop war crimes
@@New.Beginnings88UN law does not govern Israelâs security. They do.
@@EranRicos Israelâs lost a lot of international support and made its own security more vulnerable by acting so violent and brutal
â@@New.Beginnings88They were attacked first and will not stop until all the hostages are safe.
@@user-pr3vm3xe6l doesnât matter. They reacted too harsh. Collective punishment is a war crime.
Also they didnât attack first. Gaza has been an open air prison for over 20 years. Theyâre treated poorly and have over 140 check points on their own land.
20,000 Palestinians have been killed there by Israel since 2003-2023
What started to annoy me in your videos is that you always say that the US has the strongest military in the world, but according to you, the US can never defeat anyone, especially alone. What is the point of your videos when you look at them and they are all made in almost the same way. According to you, the US can't do anything alone, without allies, it can't defeat anyone without allies, and you keep mentioning that they have the strongest army. As for this video, the US would stomp on Iran in a month without the American boot stepping into Iran. Your videos and your statistics and analytics started to disappoint me. And every video with the title "What Happens If", but I doubt your theories more and more.
This sounds personal to you, what is your personal interest in all of this?
Aye ran is defending while the US is own the offense. Meaning, Aye rans full arm me against a faction of the US arm me. The Us won't use it's full arm me own aye ran bee cause Russia and Chinese are their biggest threats. The US Ken win,But the cost won't bee worth the gain. Day wood know longer bee the top sue purr power win it's over.
The US kneads allies bee cause of this.
The US is the steongest military in the world
But no single military in the world is soloing bear peer nations. You lack comprehension
The U.S. military would bend Iran over a barrel and have it's way with it over and over and over again.
Remember what people said about Iraq and how scary their military was?
Same thing with Russia.
U.S. has made war a business, and business is good.
But your marines literally kneel to Iran since 2016 ,you sure about that?
Iran successfully destroyed 3 bases of the regime in occupied lands , nevatim, negev and 8200 despite all effort by 8 layers of defence system,iran didn't use it's best weapons and it wasn't a full scale attack yet regime put everything it had and all helps from Arabs and west and failed, that shows Iran is unstoppable.
did you forget the USA were defeated by the Taliban?
@@paulmillward9092 not in combat in direct combat, more like how it was in Vietnam but ya ig
@@john-vc5bz USA- "i was defeated and Iran"
I donât believe that this is a very good scenario this is no air action in the early stages that can take out most of Iranâs missile capability
I sure hope they think the WNBA games are a target. We wouldnât lose too many people.
"Hour by Hour"? Would it actually last more than an hour?
đđ probably not and without a boot on the ground too.
well it could take maybe a hour to get `proportional`
"we declare w... oh wait its already over? alright bois pack it up"
37 minutes
Depends on if the boats are touched or not
Don't be ridiculous, you compared Iran to US power. You must be out of touch to realities.
Size Doesn't Matter
US cannot fight most are drugs addicted
well US Couldnât remove Taliban, the poorest country on earth!
He doesn't know shit America can use all available aircraft from all bases in the area also NATO will get involved.
There is no USS Arleigh. There is a destroyer named the USS Arleigh Burke (DDG-51), named for a famous Admiral of the US Navy, and the whole series of ships in that classification that followed are called Arleigh Burke class destroyers. You wouldn't call it the "Arleigh," you would call it the "Burke," if you were to use only one name, but most sailors would not call it either. It's disrespectful. It's the "Arleigh Burke." The info regarding how many aircraft aboard US carriers like the Nimitz or Ford class is completely wrong too. Was this video made by a Chinese or Russian bot? It sure seems that way.
đŻđ
You seem to for get the USAF. You need to rethink this BS
The US has unrivaled economic, military, technological and space dominance, and a weaker Iran would not win even china does not have such good technology, training, experience and logistics as the us has, this gives them an advantage even in the Navy, it is worth noting that although the Chinese one is bigger, the American one is better in terms of tonnage, technological training and has much better ships
America could be as sloppy as Russia. We can say whatever we want to but the truth will come out once something actually happens.
â@@chaikaomoua1169No, we have dominated every battlefield we've been on since the 1800s. We would win this war easily. It's what comes after that's hard.
@@toddlawrence6872All I'm saying is don't be so cocky yet, once America kicks Iran's butt you can gloat all you want.
â@@chaikaomoua1169where not Russia lol if America say it can do something it can most likely an understatement.
Tehran would have no electricity,internet,phone orwater services, within hours, just for starters.
For my American viewers, America is the MLB. Iran is a high school team. Thatâs the big difference.
iran is a little league team lol
For the football fans, this would be like the Kansas City Chiefs going up against a Junior High team.
@@dillonbuel5165 Nah more like tea-ball league...lol!
@@dillonbuel5165 We need to find a name for US and allies against Iran backed Afghanistan disaster LOL
That attack of 300 missiles and drones (around 10% of their total suppy) only 4 landed all missing their targets.
2 words "nuclear bombardment" Japan galvanized their population, yet they still surrendered in the face of this threat.
America can't use nukes other than defense. Dangerous precedent would be set encouraging others. Nukes should never have been unleashed.
imagine Iran did the same!
Jordan were also involved in shooting down the rockets
It's impossible to predict.
Remember, the US first thought that Vietnam was going to be a piece of cake. Then look at what happened hehe
Only because they didnt do unrestricted bombing on the North because it could have brought escalation with other parties and instead tried to fight a prolonged jungle war with a highly trained and well supplied determined enemy on their own turf. Classic situations modern military lose in. Not to say vitnam was right.
That was the politicians fault... not the military
But given the faith I have in the current administration fair point
This is the worst what if scenario I have ever heard and you have lost my subscription because of it.
Yeah I'm done with this channel also
Lost mine as well. There are operational plans already in place where strikes would be made on Iran's command and control, nuclear, naval and missile assets within hours. Iran's air assets can't even operate outside its own borders.
Irans president gonna take a forever nap after his pilot pulls a Kobe. Trust me Iâm from the future
My comments get taken down but I just come back and put them back up anyway đ
Dude if you say anything thing politically controversial youâre comments get pulled as fast as you put them up! 90% of my comments get deleted and not for harassment or anything like that itâs bs lol
Don't forget Australia, our row boats and boomerangs are stealthy.
Haha
Don't forget the Stealth Drop Bears...and the Swoopy Birds
Well, Raisi won't do one single thing mentioned here; his helicopter just flew into a mountain. So, there's that......
You kinda missed the fact that every NATO would be required to fully commit to the same war.
Not if it wasn't a direct attack
@@DMS-pq8 If NATO won't come to US aid if it is attacked. The US should abandon NATO.
Let the world go back to pre 1939 politics. i
Yeah we noticed Nato's performance during Iran back Afghanistan, Iraq etc and recently in Israel LOL
The Iranian president had reportedly died in a helicopter crash a couple of days ago.
they would be back in the stone age in less then 30 days
Why is a Brit speculating on war between two other countries? What makes him an expert?
i think the voice is artificial.
And you completely left out the USAF for the first several weeks? This also left out the NSA as the premier and most powerful SIGNT/hacking organization.
Iran and the US have never engaged in a direct war.
Operation Praying Mantis was a surprise attack by the US on Iranian naval targets in the Persian Gulf during the Iran-Iraq War, when Iran was facing global isolation. That was a treacherous surprise attack. The US suffered far more casualties and ship losses in the Pearl Harbor attack, which occurred when the US was not at war with anyone.
The US NAVY killed a lot of Iranian naval men and destroyed many Iranian boats during Praying Mantis. What do you mean it wasn't a direct engagement?
Who is watching this after Raisi died in a helicopter crash?
Yeah dude you're gonna lose subscribers deleting our comments.
CZcams has bots that auto delete comments. The channel doesn't do it.
The delayed slow response sounds about right with Biden in control
The US wasn't attacked by Iraq, but they had help from other countries during the war. The backing the US would receive in this situation would overwhelm Iran and anyone with them.
If there were repeated terrorist attacks from a known source, you couldn't rule out nukes. Continued massacres of civilians wouldn't be tolerated.
Hour 1, Hour 2, Hour 24? Did we lose nearly a day?
Ooops! Iranâs president isnât saying much anymore đȘ đ
The U.S. had an advantage with their battle groups/ fleet already in the station zone.
Well this video didn't age well... just saying...
Came here to say this, was beaten to it, I tip my cap to you.
Highly, highly unlikely scenario and a strange analysis of events.
If only libs knew what they truly support.
......cool?
Okay, this is BS. As someone who served in the Navy, there is always a fleet in the Mediterranean. That will almost always have a carrier in that fleet so a response will be done in less than a week. This video is idiotic.
This might be the worst video youâve made. You are giving Iran way too many wins. Look at operation praying mantis for an example of how this would actually go.
If the fight is in US soil then the looser will be US
We have 360 million and everyone is armed
US never Win a war, but win many battles
I think it is time for Tehran to learn a lesson called F.A.A.F.O!!!
In the hypothetical scenario where tens of thousands of USA citizens are killed in an Iran terrorist attack, the response from the USA would indeed be overwhelming. Numerous long-range missiles would be deployed from air, sea, and land, leading to the rapid and significant loss of Iranian lives in retaliation. It is a complex and serious matter, and the USA will not hesitate to take decisive action in such a grave situation.
Why don't you talk about peace? You seem to be obsessed with war. You better see a psychiatrist.
It's called The Military Show
Tuff call. The best funded, trained, and equipped military vs iran. That's like a pro team ( any sport ) vs the worst rated high school team.
The idea that Ira would be able to attack the USA with no warning is laughable.
I can respect what is definitely a steel man representation of Iran's military capabilities but I feel like the US air defense is taken at its weekest possible capabilites. A carrier is vulnerable to missile and drone strikes but we don't send a carrier, we send carrier batle groups. We are far more likely to loose ships to submarines as it seems we are a bit week in antisub. If anything the US has shown extreme prowess in air defense. In all likely hood Iran would need to use an extremely large portion of its stockpile atriting fleet Aegis systems before it had any hope of mission killing a carrier let alone sinking one. And thinking that even a single lost ship wouldn't spark total war is rather wishfull. It's a well known international fact when it comes to the US "don't touch the boats".
You need grammar 101
Try it! Funk around and find out...
I am from Iran and I may not like America, but I hope that the war will not start because we will be 50 years behind. If the Iran Iraq war had not happened, despite the heavy sanctions, our economy could be twice as large as it is now.
Ask Ayatollah Khamenei. If it was for the Islamic Republic, Iran would be the most famous and richest country in the middle east. They would more rich than Germany or Japan
@@giftedtheos
Yes I know but America sanctioned us
Future Fanfic Video Suggestion: The US Military (and/or NATO forces) vs. the droid armies of CIS from the Star Wars Prequel-era comparison. Who would win?
This has all just gone to pot. Raisi just died in a helicopter crash. Unless part of his plan was to fake his death, somebody has got to come up with something else.
On the ground, America cannot defeat Iran, Iran is a mountainous version of Vietnam
Also China will never allow Iran to fall because Iran is a key country
I'm 2 minutes into the video and still no signs of NATO? Is the US Navy really as weak as it is shown? War weariness is not an issue if and when our forces attack en masse. The people of the country will be out for blood and the American response would be massive. Korea and Vietnam likely won't happen again.
Bro what about nato?
We are peaceful and Love all nations especially Americans We Love USA from IRAN đźđ·â€ïžđșđžâïž
We?đ
I suppose Iran could throw a few good punches with their air force, but the US would tank it, and then hit back with the Air Force and Navy and Iran would get hit so hard they would be out of commission
Dont touch the boats or you see the sun
Wow, way too much credit given to Iran. Itâs probably over for Iran after the first volley of cruise missiles from US Navy subs and ships.
Just to be keep it simple, and not get into all the reasons this video is ridiculous, Iâll just point out some examples this video didnât talk about, first is immediately after a attack on the mainland, massive air strikes
Wouid be taking place with aircraft like the B-2, B-1, B-52, drones like the Reaper, Rapid dragon missile strikes, etc, second the US navyâs submarines are by far the best in the world by a country mile, they wouid be immediately causing chaos by launching cruise missiles into Iran and sinking Iranian ships, third American special forces wouid immediately be involved, im thinking a important part of their mission wouid be finding targets behind enemy lines, and last Everyday Americans are absolutely United when a enemy attacks the mainland and kills civilians, so expecting nothing short of that is not realistic
Honestly, this scenario reminds me of the ancient Roman-Persian Wars were both sides would literally come inches to toppling the other and yet they would still negotiate in the last moment and find a settlement that returns both sides to the status quo, I guess some things never change lol.
What a Coincidence that he got WHACKED !
The real scenario would only be a 5 minute video but ok......what if videos are fun i guess
Ukraine wins because Iran will no longer be able to supply Russia with munitions and drones.
In fact, the US could probably buy Iranian cooperation to help Ukraine.
Let Obama send them some more pallets of $100 bills!
@@vanroeling2930 The original was mostly paid in Euros, but the point isn't that we can still buy their compliance. That ship sailed when Spraytan McPoopypants pulled the US out of the deal.
Let's not bicker in front of the neighbors.
I come from the future. These scenario is not happening. The Iranian president is gone. He lost a war with a mountain.
I consider this video an insult to US army
Obviously you have tok much faith in Iranian missiles
Raisi this and Raisi that.
Raisi helicopter splat!
Don't. Touch. My. DUCKING. BOATS.
đșđžđŹđ§đźđ±đšđŠđđ”đžđŽđźđ·
Who would win WW3 next!
You could do with a bit more study in history if this seems plausible. U.S./NATO forces completely wrecked Iraq when it had the fourth most powerful army in the world, and more air defenses than any nation exempting Russia., not to mention a contingent of modern tanks numbering at least several thousand. A million soldiers, 700 aircraft, 5500 tanks. And it took six weeks to completely destroy that military, with so few coalition losses that the number of dead via enemy action (147) is about equal to the number of dead due to accident/mishap (145).
Iran currently has 587,000 soldiers, about 70 air superiority fighters (all of which were made before I was born), and a navy that is roughly the size of a rounding error for U.S. naval strength. Even for the region they aren't particularly powerful. They spend 2% of their GDP on defense, and most of that is focused on drones and cruise missiles. Something which U.S. warships and missile defenses have proven aren't all that effective presently. The U.S. spends 3% of a much, much higher GDP on defense, and actively builds new warships and fighters constantly. Almost all of Iran's navy and air force are hand-downs from the Soviet Union or pre-1970s U.S. inventory.
I'm not saying Iran couldn't put up a fight at all, but on their own they are absolutely no competition. And though much of the rest of the region might act like they hate the U.S. (and many people within them probably very much do), there are few that would be willing to face the consequences of a huge trade sanction package as Iran currently is working within.
Hours 3 through 6: The new President of Iran (Raisi, of course, having been killed in a plane crash in May 2024) doesn't have any time to enjoy the fruits of labor: Article Five is being contemplated by many, and within six hours, Canada wants it invoked.
Hour 9: Vladimir Putin sends Iran a message of abject approval of what just happened.
Hour 11: France joins Canada in calling for invocation of Article Five -- Putin congratulating Iran sends Macron into a tizzy.
Hour 39: Another Iranian sleeper cell mobilizes -- in Toronto.
Hour 41: The Niagara Falls Hydroelectric Plant is attacked (from the Canadian side).
Hour 42: Biden and Trudeau invoke Article Five on each other as a show of unity between the two non-European members of NATO
3 weeks yet no real us responce.... I think shock and awe would be on the cards real quick
Don't know much about military stuff, but quite a bit about Iranian politics, so two comments:
1. The Iranian president is just a puppet of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who is also the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of the Islamic Republic. So why is the president making all the decisions in this video while Khamenei is never mentioned?
2. One very important thing missing in this scenario is the Iranian population. They widely oppose the regime but are in general very patriotic. So they could assist in bringing down a weakened regime as well as fiercely support the defence when they see their nation threatened - completely depending on the US behaviour.
I dont think Iran would want to go head to head for the long term. Im sure they will use all their missiles and drones within the first week. They know the longer they hold these weapons, the more likely theyll be taken out. Week 2-4 Iran will use all their special op forces and do special missions to try and do as much damage as they can to US navy and allies. The special forces attacks are strategic and meant to lure US into Iran. IF US sends soldiers into Iran, Iranian soldiers will be waiting and do their best to hold the mountains. This is also strategic because it will give Iranian soldiers back in their main cities time to take off their uniforms, and simply wait. This is when we will see the most blood shed on both sides. Saying it will be Afghanistan 2.0 is a under statement. I think within the first 2 weeks of the ground invasion, the death count wil be higher then the decades combined in Afghanistan.
Pretty much all their valuable military hardware is safely stored away deep underground in reinforced subterranean facilities which are almost certainly immune to conventional strikes, most of them would likely survive megaton ground burst nuclear strikes unscathed. Their hardware is safe for as long as they need it, but I do agree that they will likely use the majority of their ballistic missiles very quickly, as Iranian doctrine prioritizes massive missile and drone salvos to overwhelm countermeasures, therefore Iran will likely consume most of their ballistic missiles soon after the outbreak or potentially open with them in a somewhat surprise attack before air defenses can be hardened and targets prepared sufficiently, though they will know almost as soon as the missiles begin launching.
1:12 welpâŠ.đ
As of posting this comment, 16 hours, 30k views, only 770 likes. I really need to get one of those extensions that brings back the dislike count. I dont imagine this one has a favorable ratio.
I Wonder if im correct in thinking that its time for NATO. TO REACT???
at around 21.11 western Australian time I just watched what I thought was a plane appear as I looked at the moon and then tried to figure out which was Venus . I saw It move oddly then concentrated on keeping the stars around it as part of a pic like stepping back and looking at the whole building and it bounced around flashing white red blue and green lights (later also green) . I have never seen any aircraft move like that and it traveled at a very high speed , faster than any military jet which often fly over here it kept moving erratically bent it's course in then out seaward .THERE WAS NO NOISE EXCEPT THE SURF AND PROB A BLIND DOG HITTING TIN AS DODGE BUMPS INTO IT IN THE HOUSE BEHIND WHICH WAS WHAT BROUGHT ME OUT TO SEE IF IT WAS OR TO OFFER HELP IF THEY OR HER WAS MOVING TIN SHEETS. THE OBJECT WAS HIGH AND I FIRST THOUGH ISS STATION UNTIL IT BOUNCED AROUND , IT ALSO DIDN'T COME UP OVER THE HORIZON IT WAS SUDDENLY THERE ??? IT PASTED OVERHEAD NO NOISE SEEMED TO SLIDE SIDEWAYS THEN A BIT LONGER WENT SIDEWAYS AND SUDDENLY UP . the speed it would have to travel across made me think maybe about to be nuked and have cancer am dying so would have turned to miss flash so not blinded but would watch the mushroom cloud ; I love fireworks . seen min min lights in N.T and outback QLD but this ???? aircraft only flash red and white , make sound even when high up and take about 12 to 18 min to cross fighters maybe 9 mins quickest Ive seen this 6 to 7 minutes . would love to confirm air traffic but the aliens exist question ? answered ?
Iran would not win. But the US would pay a significant price. Also while we were involved in a war with Iran. China would attack Tawain while we were distracted.
This was a comedy showâŠIranians have never targeted civilians so you got it wrong right from the start.
Simply the U.S would lose. We don't have the appetite to take on Iran at this time or the foreseeable future.
simply not the case where a homland is attacked.. the dynamics of war change. Think WWII ... pre pearl harbour ; post pearl harbour. ok, pearl harbour isnt homeland.. but still it changed the dynamics and ensured involvement and endurance for war. Not that a major war is a good thing ; it isn't!
What about all those missle boats there's thousands of those little roaches.
History is amazing. Iâm seeing so many Americans touting their technological superiority against a more conventional enemy.. the same thing they did to Vietnam.
Iran might not have DARPA making them interdimensional portals but surely they know how to make an EMP.
Donât be so naive. America lost in a war game against Iran.. or âRed Teamâ [definitely Iran] because the general worked smarter and not harder.
Embarrassingly, the US had to script the game (i interpret this to be nerfing Red Team) to make it look like a victory or to be able to achieve victory.
I understand technology has progressed by then, but not only just for America.
Donât go nerfing the enemy in your own minds. You may win in the end but like with Germany in WWI and Japan in WWII you will be lashed, and in the case of Afghanistan it will not be a cut and dry case like you thought it would be.
Food for thought.
Though likely a coalition of over 20 countries will participate again in order to share economical constraints
Have you gone anti-USA?
well US Couldnât remove Taliban, the poorest country on earth!
Who wins?
Politicians
Pure bullshit from day one lmao
I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
I do think Isreal will be much more involved in this scenario. Im not sure a peaceful end will come
Ú©ŰłÛ Ú©Ù Ű±ÙÛ ÙÙŰŽÙ ŰšŰ±Ű§Û ŰźÙŰŻŰŽ ÙŸÛ۱ÙŰČÛ Ù ÛâÚ©ŰŽŰŻ
ÙÛÚÙÙŰȘ ۯ۱ Ù ÛŰŻŰ§Ù Ùۚ۱ۯ ÙŸÛ۱ÙŰČ ÙŰźÙۧÙŰŻ ŰŽŰŻ
Unmanned amphibious vehicles and a running circuit of similar layered air defense plus a landed ground to ground strike capability could run amuck if the threat of iranian electric diesel subs and fast boats were properly mitigated.
I'm a subscriber for quite a while, and normally I like ur stuff......but, man this was bad. After 8 hrs iran would have been hit so hard there would not be much left after the 2nd day
Everybody already knows he's weak that's why if this war happens it'll be because of him
What a joke!
Remember it is called persian gulf!
No one can beat Iran at persian Gulf!
Tell me just one victory of US over Iran in last 45 years!đ
This is all highly unrealistic.. on several points, mainly..
In a situation where US is hit in the homeland it would raise irreversible war .. same as it did during 911... its human nature and the way of things. People wouldnt be scared to peace ; its the same mistake all aggressors make when they attack a nations civilian populations especially... There is a sort of blurred line you can cross and make it back behind it again ; but a major attack doesn't provide that.
If an attack happened like that the rest would be similar to the response after pearl harbour... and fear of "getting sucked into war" ... that ship will have well and truly sailed.
Once a full scale war happens and people have died.. its on.. and it wont stop and go back to negotiations.. thats just unrealistic. History teaches us that much.. a nation will not negotiate after it is attacked unless it doesnt have the means to fight.. which obviously doesnt apply to this situation. The video also underestimates the destructive power and how quickly that would happen if US air power is in a gloves off fight..
This is all why it is very important to ensure that an aggressor never miscalculates.
Frankly, if people have died due to proxy attacks.. Biden wouldnt have the political ability to negotiate out of all out war.. even if he wanted to.. he would be swept along by events.
You left the most important thing out do Americans have the money to do it ? I think they don't
You should ask iran that⊠remember praying mantis