'I Personally Watched Justice Victoria Gauri’s Videos And I Was Terribly Shocked': Justice AP Shah

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 23. 02. 2023
  • 'I Personally Watched Justice Victoria Gauri’s Videos And I Was Terribly Shocked': Justice AP Shah
    LiveLaw brings you the latest legal news and updates from India and beyond.
    We are into fact based legal journalism.
    Endeavour of LiveLaw is to play an active role for a transparent and democratic legal ecosystem, in the larger public interest.
    This video is an intellectual property belonging to LiveLaw Media Pvt Ltd. Any unauthorised usage of this video/script in any format is prohibited and will be subject to prosecution.
    Stay updated. Subscribe to our channel bit.ly/2pskgB3
    Support Us: bit.ly/35qFj6A
    Visit Our Website: www.livelaw.in/
    hindi.livelaw.in
    Facebook: / livelawindia
    / livelawhindi
    Twitter: / livelawindia
    / livelawh
    Instagram: / livelaw.in
    / livelawhindi
    Linkedin: / livelaw
    / livelaw-hindi
    Live Law app is India's fastest legal news app that will keep you updated on the latest law/legal news from India and across the world. Download now.
    Android: bit.ly/2toaimp
    iOS: apple.co/39dQ0vh

Komentáře • 284

  • @rajur13
    @rajur13 Před rokem +35

    He has represented the common people who have none in the top judiciary to protect their interest legally. Thank you Sir

  • @ganeshansrinivasan2151
    @ganeshansrinivasan2151 Před rokem +42

    We are all shocked at statements / orders passed by judiciary these days.

    • @davelawson2564
      @davelawson2564 Před rokem +4

      they think they are allowed to dictate instead of judge as per law

    • @yj9032
      @yj9032 Před rokem

      You mean they are upholding the constitution and protecting it from Dictator Modi?

    • @davelawson2564
      @davelawson2564 Před rokem +2

      @@yj9032 I'm sure your papa george soros is holy saint . LOL

  • @kader1435
    @kader1435 Před rokem +14

    He is a good and responsible Judge & great human being.
    He is believed to be sincere ( Mother India must be proud to have him )with a person of character.
    Transperncy is the main criteria while appointing judges.

  • @ramdasss5289
    @ramdasss5289 Před rokem +3

    The Constitution when originally drafted was befeft of the 'Secular'. The reason for inserting 'Secular' in Constitution was to favour miniorities by appeasing them Why Common Civil Code is still not mandated?

  • @daphnerego2675
    @daphnerego2675 Před rokem +32

    Justice AP Shah spoke very openly without any fear. Great admiration! I hope we have more Judges like him.

  • @pradeeprathee8059
    @pradeeprathee8059 Před rokem +45

    Beautifully explained the dangers of excutive appointing the judges , people should be vigilant and not let this happen. Infact judiciary should stike it down if someone tries to tinker with it.

    • @hatmc8507
      @hatmc8507 Před rokem +1

      And what about nepotism in judiciary? Why don’t judges are not declaring their wealth and all that? What about unwanted comment they always use do which are not in verdict?

    • @kanishkadas9290
      @kanishkadas9290 Před rokem +1

      @@hatmc8507 They are learned persons they say what is fact but they are not corrupt or bias because it is the strong pillar of the country.

    • @hatmc8507
      @hatmc8507 Před rokem +2

      @@kanishkadas9290 just yesterday CBI caught 1 judge with 2 or 4 carore

    • @kanishkadas9290
      @kanishkadas9290 Před rokem

      @@hatmc8507 where it happened.

    • @kanishkadas9290
      @kanishkadas9290 Před rokem

      @@hatmc8507 what is nepotism? They declared their assets as per procedure.

  • @anzitasaikia471
    @anzitasaikia471 Před rokem +8

    Wonderful Justice Shah, as always all your points were highly thought out, futuristic and considerate to the marginalised. I would like to get your views on Judges accountability too. Thanks.

  • @phbharadia1
    @phbharadia1 Před rokem +3

    It is very strange that while Justice A P Shah addressing and giving his views about judiciary pf Indian supreme court, people in audience busy and playing with their mobiles! Is our educated audience do care and is worth of listening this honourable judge?

  • @sekarselvakumar280
    @sekarselvakumar280 Před rokem +20

    Live Law you do a great job of spreading awareness. Keep it up.

  • @rajapandianc5611
    @rajapandianc5611 Před rokem +18

    Justice A P Shaw was one of the best CJs in Chennai High court. Great judge. Unfortunately he was not appointed to supreme court due to political reasons. Great man with great mind.

    • @hiheloByby6902
      @hiheloByby6902 Před rokem +4

      And imagine if Government wants to get involved in Appointing procedure.. or have Finla say
      Only God knows

    • @abhijeetpanchal9301
      @abhijeetpanchal9301 Před rokem

      He was a good at appeasement

  • @kuntumreznolddas492
    @kuntumreznolddas492 Před rokem +4

    Citizens main desire is that independence of the Judiciary should be maintained.

  • @krishnanbharathi7988
    @krishnanbharathi7988 Před rokem +6

    He talked from his heart and put forth very very valid suggestions to improve the present system of judiciary appointments. Like wise, one more convention can be arranged wherein how to improve the functioning of Govt servants not giving scope for service deficiencies, how a corruption free society to be created can be discussed in it and put forth valid suggestion to Govt to implement it enacting new laws if necessary.

    • @MIDRaju
      @MIDRaju Před rokem

      I am with you in your valid request.

  • @greatapple773
    @greatapple773 Před rokem +4

    Justice A. P. Shah was an exceptional and upright judge as I had observed him in the Bombay High Court. His every word speaks of justice.

  • @menezesl
    @menezesl Před rokem +1

    Can he speak on the corruption and 2am bail in supreme Court. Bet he will not open his mouth

  • @MIDRaju
    @MIDRaju Před rokem +2

    What a speech! Great Judge. Admire him.

  • @sudhirraktate3884
    @sudhirraktate3884 Před rokem +1

    Selfish people under the grab of justice.

  • @DeccanPS
    @DeccanPS Před rokem +16

    But I'm sure the gentlemen wasn't shocked by comments of SC judges in the Nupur Sharma case. The last bastion of left ecosystem is about to be teared down. Enjoy the show.

    • @arnipskumar3245
      @arnipskumar3245 Před rokem +3

      Yes, left eco system heavily infiltrated judiciary and education....need to break this hold...and Bharath go back to its roots of Dharma.. 🙏

    • @richasinha9112
      @richasinha9112 Před rokem +2

      Pranaam bhratashri, you are absolutely correct,

  • @shaunbird8051
    @shaunbird8051 Před rokem +2

    Very interesting and engaging. Thanks to Justice Shah.

  • @titus.sj.pune.
    @titus.sj.pune. Před rokem +5

    Very consoling! The soul of our nation is still alive because of the judges like him and our CJI of the SC.

    • @solelysoul8543
      @solelysoul8543 Před rokem +1

      I am a Christian and I am ashamed of my religion. I hope the courts help me in stopping and reverting the conversions.
      The masses enslaved by aggression and deceit will be free.

    • @solelysoul8543
      @solelysoul8543 Před rokem

      Father, what was the inquisition.
      Was the soul of Jesus alive then.
      Or, Papal bull 1492. The soul of the natives of America, Africa, Australia and Asia.
      We Christians are, the blind led by the blind into a pit.
      Jesus taught hatred against our country or betrayal against our country.
      What a shame.
      Father, can you please give some advice about SALVATION or about the original sin or about baptism.
      We, the christian masses, have been MISLED, brainwashed, converted, controlled, deracinated, indoctrinated and enslaved for world domination.
      Pray for wisdom.
      How many has the church managed to infiltrate in the judiciary.

    • @titus.sj.pune.
      @titus.sj.pune. Před rokem

      @@solelysoul8543 you don't have a name. You want to hide your identity and sit on the throne of judgement. I am not part of your 'we'. You are a RSSBJP IT cell coolie or a bot. Hope and pray you get a better employment.

    • @solelysoul8543
      @solelysoul8543 Před rokem

      @titus.sj.pune. Father, Jesus called the learned pharasies as hypocrites.
      If Jesus comes again, he will call us hypocrites.
      We have a great big wonderful God, is the hymn we would sing.
      We have a great, anti bjp , politically inclined priest, we shall sing now.
      Pray for yourself and all those who have been hurt and MISLED by the church.
      Long ago, I knew a salesian brother Titus. Or was it at St Pius, Goregaon.

  • @kpsudhakar6900
    @kpsudhakar6900 Před rokem +3

    Well articulated. Right from 1950s to 1971, then upto 1993 and so on.... he covered the transformation of Executive & Judiciary appointments, with each one's pros & cons. The defects of Colleagium and the need to make it transparent is justified. Jayaho, Justice Shah.

    • @Prasannakumar-yk7bf
      @Prasannakumar-yk7bf Před rokem

      Thanks to IndiraGandhi for having started the domino effect in Judiciary.

  • @sukumarsethurajan9849

    Independence of Judiciary does not mean dictatorship of Judiciary.

  • @pp_01123
    @pp_01123 Před rokem +22

    I think Justice Shah wanted to convey phases in Indian Judiciary:
    1947-1970 Independent Judiciary
    1971-1981 Committed judiciary with Punitive actions
    1982-1992 Executive deciding what judiciary should do (worst phase of Judiciary)
    1992-2014 Partially Independent with little give and take with government
    2014- PRESENT Ideological Committed Judiciary with Safronization

    • @sriranga1000
      @sriranga1000 Před rokem +3

      Is not saffronization better than christianization And Islamization

    • @devdevan9091
      @devdevan9091 Před rokem +2

      @@sriranga1000 religion and state should be indipendent. Our religion is the constitution. Problem with hindutva gang is match or adapt the bad practices of muslim countries surrounding india.

    • @sivaramanmudaliar9728
      @sivaramanmudaliar9728 Před rokem +3

      @@sriranga1000 Tri color is better than only saffron

    • @Spoonfeede
      @Spoonfeede Před rokem +2

      @@devdevan9091 Bad muslim practices Need to be identified and then bad hindu practices should be compared.Dont make all religions equal without having knowledge

    • @devdevan9091
      @devdevan9091 Před rokem

      @@Spoonfeede what I ment was hindutva gang is adopting the bad practices of muslims. Bajrang dal and VHP are organisations that promotes voilance like the jihadi organisations and Rss too.

  • @penntemp
    @penntemp Před rokem +3

    AP Shah has been accused of favouritism and corruption.

    • @penntemp
      @penntemp Před rokem

      @lansinngkahmei2417 By a former chief justice of the Supreme Court.

  • @theindian2226
    @theindian2226 Před rokem +2

    Thanks, Justice Shah. It is an insightful discourse.

  • @PROTECTHINDUS
    @PROTECTHINDUS Před rokem +2

    Retired Judges must not be made arbitrators and head commissions. However they may take up teaching, research and fight for weak citizens.

  • @akshaydhariwal
    @akshaydhariwal Před rokem +1

    Now everything has flaw because they dont like certain appointment and he is not getting anything from government. Now suddenly after 12 years of retirement he realized that system has flaw.. fraud..

  • @srinivasanr1565
    @srinivasanr1565 Před rokem

    Independence of ALL THREE pillars is the NEED.

  • @lappasiramasamy2440
    @lappasiramasamy2440 Před rokem +10

    Instead of finding which system is fair for enrollment of judges in court it is important to fix accountability for judicial fraternity both lawyers and judges are law breakers and muscles of conscience ethics rusted. No reform will improve without fixing accountability. Rules the same judgment varies on appreciation of evidence and time lapse prompts to think judges are maha chors of 1st order

    • @jsm3692
      @jsm3692 Před rokem

      We continued the Colonial ( Moslem and later, East India Co. and British Crown) tradition of complete immunity from any sort of public accountability of the bureaucracy, police and Judicial Officials. Since after Mrs I.G's Emergency and starting with the Janta Regime the Civil and Judicial class have, step by step, completed an ironclad shield around themselves, protecting themselves from any consequential srutiny, answerability or Punishment.. The hardware is corrupt. Worse, the software of process procedure and record has been corrupted right up to our minds and our culture. Ramaswami, I couldn't agree with you more.

    • @sivan8224
      @sivan8224 Před rokem

      👍👍👍 100% true

  • @rajanpune5167
    @rajanpune5167 Před rokem +2

    Justice AP Shah speach is too good, his ideas could be implemented

  • @vs9324
    @vs9324 Před rokem +3

    Have a search committee comprising of renowned people who will scrutinise all candidates and then recommend the names to the collegium.

    • @rajat3180
      @rajat3180 Před rokem

      There is already a research team at the supreme court which recommends names to the collegium

    • @vs9324
      @vs9324 Před rokem

      @@rajat3180 The search committee should comprise of "renowned people" not people on the payroll of SC. The committee should act independently without any influence from the judiciary, executive or legislature.

    • @rajat3180
      @rajat3180 Před rokem

      @@vs9324 I agree with u. Recent judgement of SC which ordered that minimum one third judges of HC should be from district judiciary, the diversity which SC ensures in terms of diversity in gender, caste, religion, high courts is all set to ensure that nepotism won't prevail in the future judges. So system has already corrected itself and I think even without such an independent committee, SC will be able to attract the best talent which will be free from nepotism

  • @_ABHITIWARI
    @_ABHITIWARI Před rokem +3

    Really live law is going to dominate in the future.

  • @rravisankar3355
    @rravisankar3355 Před rokem +1

    In a democracy everyone must be accountable to the parliament. It is the Parliament alone which is sovereign in democracy. Now the 'collegium' assumes itself to be the sovereign which is ludicrous.

  • @sannagesh6376
    @sannagesh6376 Před rokem +1

    What about the corrupt judges appointed by the Collegium? Does the common man get to know who in the Collegium recommended him? Sir, the Collegium has outlived its utility. Better to discard it and save face. The executive is responsible to the electorate that doesn't spare it.

  • @ramdasss5289
    @ramdasss5289 Před rokem

    One thing is clear that Hon'ble Judges tend to favour their relatives in Judiciary.

  • @deshbandhuroy5474
    @deshbandhuroy5474 Před rokem +1

    Why collegium pannel.... not introducing cooling period of 5 yrs for supreme court retired judges for accepting govt nominated position,....
    Why not SC put sumo motto case against such appointments.... review & appoint committee.... put the matter under 5 judges committee..??
    Why SC is silent??.... why Prashant Bhushan is silent?? Opposition is silent for their own reasons....

  • @satyasingal
    @satyasingal Před rokem +1

    Justice AP Shah has unmasked the collegium by explaining its bias in selecting judges .

  • @hiheloByby6902
    @hiheloByby6902 Před rokem +9

    I Hope High Court collegium ,give importance to sub ordinate Judicial service officers .. for Elevations to HC .. after holding least 10 years of office 🙏...Sir , that would be really Appreciable .. Otherwise most of Good Intellectual Judges retire at District level ..

    • @perfectionistpersona
      @perfectionistpersona Před rokem

      True. In Karnataka there is strong lingayat lobby.

    • @sushilkumarsaraf4399
      @sushilkumarsaraf4399 Před rokem

      Agree. But they should go through tests, interviews etc.

    • @hiheloByby6902
      @hiheloByby6902 Před rokem +1

      @@sushilkumarsaraf4399what are you talking about ?? Do you know how sub ordinate Judiciary Judges are appointed ???.. what test ?..
      You people clearly dnt understand the difference between Judicial service and civil services .. dnt you ???😂😂

    • @jptiwari8061
      @jptiwari8061 Před rokem

      Higher judiciary is den of nepotism.

    • @pp_01123
      @pp_01123 Před rokem

      I also think atleast 50% Judges should be from Judicial Services. Their experience can be used in HCs, maybe some can even reach SC (if selected at very young age)

  • @srinivasanr1565
    @srinivasanr1565 Před rokem

    First sentence itself is INCÒRRECT. Ambedkar DID NOT say that selection of judges should be with executive or Legislature.

  • @sampathkumar8171
    @sampathkumar8171 Před rokem +1

    How did His Lordship feel when two SC judges, who virtually torpedoed Ms. Nupur Sharma with harshest words, seeking clubbing of the cases filed against her in various places?

  • @riteshkumarcts
    @riteshkumarcts Před rokem +7

    We were shocked by Judges created law to appoint themselves..

  • @shankerram6076
    @shankerram6076 Před rokem +1

    the current chief justice is also the son of a chief justice.

  • @jayannil2890
    @jayannil2890 Před 11 měsíci

    Well spoken

  • @bboyscene2111
    @bboyscene2111 Před rokem +1

    One get to baffle at how consultation transform in to consent. The most irrational bias of the Judges in their own favour. Absolutely irrational and therefore arbitrary. Collegial should go.

  • @niranjanannappa9345
    @niranjanannappa9345 Před rokem

    Great speach. But shocked by distinguished gathering being oblivious to the same and meddling with Mobile

  • @srinivasanr1565
    @srinivasanr1565 Před rokem

    Every Collegium is a mirror of predecessor. Atleast the Executives did change every five year! And it avoids nepotism.

  • @sarojsharma2401
    @sarojsharma2401 Před rokem +1

    I politely disagree with some point like secularism, poverty favouritism. I think that judge must not have biased approach while giving verdict. It is lawyer's work to favour it's client.

  • @attequeahmedmirza4198

    Excellent sir

  • @budsurtees4224
    @budsurtees4224 Před rokem +11

    Justice Shah is one of the best judges India has had, and he's paid a price for his forthrightness and adherence to the truth.

    • @budsurtees4224
      @budsurtees4224 Před rokem

      @David Ridgewell Why don't you concentrate on your own shithole where you live. I'm sure it has lots of problems, even though the English rule over you.

    • @budsurtees4224
      @budsurtees4224 Před rokem

      @David Ridgewell Partners my ass. You are English vassals. You lost to them. I have Scottish friends who end their conversations with "Death to the English!". No love lost there. You sound like a compromised lass.

    • @budsurtees4224
      @budsurtees4224 Před rokem

      @David Ridgewell Well ok, sheep molestor. Baaaaa.

    • @budsurtees4224
      @budsurtees4224 Před rokem

      @David Ridgewell Sorry, that sounds stupid. Try harder, you lame sheep fu**er.

  • @maryjemyfreeman7639
    @maryjemyfreeman7639 Před rokem

    Excellent

  • @gopalsoornahalli7634
    @gopalsoornahalli7634 Před rokem +1

    His narrative is nearer to the facts, yes one of the fine judges who retired without promotion, but his words are worth to be noted 💐👏👌👍

  • @sarvankumarpursavakam3369

    Very truely

  • @rajivmishra9522
    @rajivmishra9522 Před rokem +1

    These judges not honour public opinian they are above law and behaving like a god. Nupur Sharma thrown
    From court but what happened for Pawan Kheda , he was treated like vvip, same day hearing and relaxation , why because he from congress. Is SC Court influenced from congress politics ?

  • @niraj2020
    @niraj2020 Před rokem +3

    What collegium role in accountability, transparency and responsibility of judges. How corruption. Misconduct, incompetency, delay in disposal of cases, avoiding dynasty, nepotism etc. So many unanswered question.
    Next while selection of judges, what is the pre qualification? No exam, interview etc. Only very few have opportunity to get selection as HC and SC judge. Where is right to equal opportunity to other judges, lawyers, advocates. Many thing missing. Status quo maintained.
    Please try to address these questions in rhe upcoming session. This is a layman's perspective on judiciary.

    • @sasikumarn5786
      @sasikumarn5786 Před rokem

      Read him at The Hindu. We can judge his article before it🙏🤣🤣

    • @hiheloByby6902
      @hiheloByby6902 Před rokem

      You say layman.. and and you questioned about Accountability ?? Do you know what is accountability of Judiciary ? Your questions is of not layman surely ?? Rather it looks prompted ..!! Leave all this.. you dnt even know What is the status of present collegium ...how it is functioning , Do you think this is civil services like ? That Clearing an exam is sufficient to Become Justices ??? Really man...!! ?

    • @hiheloByby6902
      @hiheloByby6902 Před rokem

      Status quo maintained ??? 😂😂 Man did you copy your comment from Google ??

  • @ravindranramachandran8187

    Of course, he wouldn't have seen any videos of anti-nationals turned politicians turned judges!

  • @pvmaiya1
    @pvmaiya1 Před rokem +1

    Collegium is not the right system to select judges and its functioning over 3 decades has exposed many deficiencies. So scap it. Instead let a set criteria be agreed between the Supreme Court and the Govt . For example eligibility for High court judge position the candidate should be in the age range of 48-55 and should have practiced in various subordinate and the high court for 20-25 years and the candidate should furnish 3 of his best argued cases. Like-wise for the Supreme Court judges criteria be worked out such that a minimum tenure of 5 years is possible if selected. A working paper on this should be widely published and invite comments from the public which should be evaluated by a committee of legal and administrative experience and based on the Committee’s recommendation the Govt and the supreme court 3 senior judges arrive at the most acceptable criteria and select candidates in a transparent manner and record the reasons for selection. and even a waiting list be made to meet to immediate vacancies withi the next 12 months

  • @susenkrishnahowladar8148

    If the same thing said someone in polished English under the guise of political theory or intersectionality,then that would be very sweet, intellectual and Palatable to Honourable Ex. Justice Mr.Sah. Sorry we need prices procedural transparent appointment system

  • @jsarora7033
    @jsarora7033 Před rokem

    Excellent. The thought and forthrightness of talk is commendable.

  • @girishrao3181
    @girishrao3181 Před rokem +1

    Why does justice AP Shah is not shocked about 10 crore cases pending in all courts of India?

  • @KrishnaKumar-uk5eu
    @KrishnaKumar-uk5eu Před rokem +1

    Present day judiciary is an appendage of British Raj. India need not copy a country (Colonial tools to keep a colony under its rule)in judiciary, bureaucracy, educational system since we became a free Democratic Republic. We should follow a modern native practical systems.

  • @shivas9600
    @shivas9600 Před rokem +2

    Has anyone checked how he favoured a particular builder who also was a close family friend from Mumbai when he was posted in Chennai court in a case that was filed against the builder in Chennai court?
    Funny how the judiciary in India thinks they are holier than thou.
    Also was he not the same person that Swami took to a village in Tamil Nadu to show him how mullas has taken over an entire village where they told the villagers they could convert and enjoy the benefits from the government or else they won't get any 😂

  • @thirunavukkarasuramasamy3330

    Not only there should be a minutes of the meeting but also publication of minutes after three years.

  • @anuragankur7260
    @anuragankur7260 Před rokem +1

    Very nice and honest judge

  • @subbu9477
    @subbu9477 Před rokem

    Thank You so much Sir... I feel it is the Biggest failure of Opposition

  • @shamlele657
    @shamlele657 Před rokem +1

    They did not take back but snatched what was not there earlier

  • @tarvsingh6241
    @tarvsingh6241 Před rokem +5

    Frank & brilliant presentation & analysis by justice Shah sahb.

  • @Nonone36
    @Nonone36 Před 3 měsíci

    Simple solution : Give some right to lawyers also in recommendation.
    After final recommendation a candidate/lawyer / cittizen should have also been given the right to challenge on some basis the recommendation before the appointment ;if the reasons/ basis are considered valid by the combination of former judges and lawyers.
    But it will be considered impractical/ not considerable.

  • @kumarelumalai8785
    @kumarelumalai8785 Před rokem

    Jai Lakshmi Narasimha Durga matha if justice are given true verdict to the nation of indian people I am honourably saying indian will respect the nation and government rules if they are true and honest

  • @parameshmalakar4535
    @parameshmalakar4535 Před rokem +1

    I, with due honour to honourable justice Shah and all present, would like to refer to ' what kind of ..one one Cristian, one Muslim,one..' If such is the way in India will families to have one boy and one girl, will villages to have one Mandir, One Masjid, One Church, will an organization to have equal Male employees and female employees. What is this happening! Has everything collapsed? Is India under metamorphosed Taliban. Debates and speeches are honest, true to the spirit but question is does India have the true CITIZENS.

  • @sundararamans654
    @sundararamans654 Před rokem

    Valuable suggestions.

  • @FaithStudyandPractice
    @FaithStudyandPractice Před rokem +1

    This retired judge earns lakhs by various means including being part of Arbitrations etc. Now lecturing others about ethics to others. Laughable!

  • @kasturiswami784
    @kasturiswami784 Před rokem

    Justice Shaw is such a good judge. We want more like him. Like Krishna Iyer. Today's judges are either threatened or given incentives
    Carrot and stick policy.

  • @swathanthirakumar5866

    Wonderful speech

  • @anitacecil1094
    @anitacecil1094 Před rokem

    'Favor'-ism and 'Favorite'-ism must totally be out 'off' judiciary. Under these catagory the person (judge) may not possess the calibre to judge the wrong/crime and can influence a wrong judgement. Judiciary must be Independent.

  • @ramrajenaiknimbalkar5001

    It only proves that no body is above corruption moral financial or otherwise.

  • @syedabdullah5119
    @syedabdullah5119 Před rokem

    Judicialdignity..prevailed.by.eminent.judges.like.justice.A.B.Shawwe.respect.him

  • @venkatraman7396
    @venkatraman7396 Před rokem

    Are there no exams and scrutiny of merit at every stage of a judge's elevation? If the collegium is transparent and subject to checks and balances, only then India can hope for quality in judgements. Otherwise it has outlived its utility.

  • @sadiqbasha8885
    @sadiqbasha8885 Před rokem

    Any connection with judges get appointed as a judge👏👏👏👏

  • @bkmehta2233
    @bkmehta2233 Před rokem

    A P Shah is perennially carping ( siyaaaapa mode )

  • @vkoli5554
    @vkoli5554 Před rokem +2

    Abhishek Manu Singhvi mms video proved how the judges were appointed in the Congress regime.....

  • @abdulwadud3495
    @abdulwadud3495 Před rokem

    Indian should take initiative to restore the integrity of judiciary

  • @amarnishant7464
    @amarnishant7464 Před rokem +1

    He is not shocked by Pardiwala statement etc... Mr Shah reputation is less said the better...he is part of Breaking India Forces..

    • @aleemshaikh31198
      @aleemshaikh31198 Před rokem

      Bro what about victoria gauri's comments. Collegium system is not perfect but still better than the system of executive being a part of appointment of judges.

  • @Imran52Feb
    @Imran52Feb Před rokem

    Indira period was also a dark period with Sanjay calling the shots.

  • @rparora2682
    @rparora2682 Před rokem

    All said nd done the collegium system needs to b abolished nd this work of appointing judges by judges does’t seem to be fair enough nd is vulnerable to a great rift among the Executive nd Judiciary which has already happened nd the after effects r being felt till today. It would b possible only if both Executive nd judiciary have to shed their egos nd sit down together to sort this out. Either this job is to b assigned to a commission comprising the eminent retired judges having unblemished track record nd one each representative from the judiciary nd Executive or why not to have a qualifying exam for judges to b conducted by UPSC? And if something is not done in this regard it would b dangerous for the democracy nd this rift between the Executive nd Judiciary shall go on increasing to the detriment of system of our country.

  • @mahaveershivaji4406
    @mahaveershivaji4406 Před rokem

    Collegium system though many years facing crisis and adjustment with executive resulted in appointment of incapacity judges which lowering the institutions, now redefined it

  • @ravinayar4314
    @ravinayar4314 Před rokem

    The judiciary considering constitutional issues are bring largely considered.
    The lay public are concerned with criminal and civil court procedures

  • @shrichandrajoshi8564
    @shrichandrajoshi8564 Před rokem

    Facism creeping in slowly & surely in judiciary.😮

  • @PROTECTHINDUS
    @PROTECTHINDUS Před rokem +1

    What happens when the Constitution itself is dictated and criticised none other than Dr. Ambedhkar.? Later what happens when Constitution is itself Amended several times to support ideology and The erstwhile Congress Communist govts ?

  • @Spoonfeede
    @Spoonfeede Před rokem +6

    Peaceful community stays blessed

  • @ranaspeaks
    @ranaspeaks Před rokem +1

    We were also terribly shocked to hear that a justice of the high court was found with cash disproportionate to his salary??? How do you guys manage it 🤔🤔

  • @danielmanohar9003
    @danielmanohar9003 Před rokem

    The Chief Justice of India should handle the Executive?
    Nonsense

  • @lakshmiprasad1356
    @lakshmiprasad1356 Před rokem

    Judges of the top court only can restrain the executive interference in the appointment of judges

  • @vineetchaturvedi9793
    @vineetchaturvedi9793 Před rokem +1

    Western ethical constructs are irrelevant to most Indians....Sudhir Kakar. That is the irony in the largest constitutional democracy in a nation where democratic values have not taken roots, despite 75 years of self government. The baggage of our cultural and religious beliefs comes in the way of implementing our constitutional values and objectives.

  • @shamlele657
    @shamlele657 Před rokem +1

    Accusations against Vice President & Law Minister are atrocious

    • @logicalindian9227
      @logicalindian9227 Před rokem

      We should be concerned about truth and falsehoods. If something is true okay fine. It is false then condemn it .

    • @kannandesikan573
      @kannandesikan573 Před rokem +1

      Former Vice President Hamid Ansari and some of the former Law Ministers are epitome of virtues than the present Vice President and Law Minister.

  • @surenderkumarohlayan6900

    80%of the population has never been represented in the Supreme Court even after 75 years caste like jats yadavs kurmis etc have never been considered for such appointments. How come???

  • @shamlele657
    @shamlele657 Před rokem

    He should name the people he had indicated as being favoured or not worth for consideration

  • @sureshbharadwaj7403
    @sureshbharadwaj7403 Před rokem +1

    Isn't Justice Shah being unfairly and openly critical, almost seeking to provoke selectively, the current dispensation, the current government. Things, the workings, in the judiciary were far more compromised, much worse in the earlier dispensation but that important aspect is given just passing references. Merely to 'appear' balanced in narrative. Absolutely no reference is made by him comparing the process of judges selection, appointments and such judicial systems prevailing in advanced countries and their democracies. What i understand is that in the USA , for instance, the executive, the government of the day, has a big say in this appointment, selection of judges. But this significant point is just not touched upon even by Justice Shah. Why ??

  • @narainvneni
    @narainvneni Před rokem

    pure hypothetical

  • @johnalexander4982
    @johnalexander4982 Před rokem

    Judge of the Aam Aadmi

  • @narendramarkale7908
    @narendramarkale7908 Před rokem

    Why is so hesitant while speaking eventhough he reading out whatever is written?

  • @csk7211
    @csk7211 Před rokem

    The problem is discussed oneside. there is no system absolutely perfect. Judiciary should also be watched and checked when ever it is necesssary as Judges are also Humanbeings, the constitution has provided the system for that. Check the system of appointments of Judges in collegium system. do u feel everything is perfect?