WHAT WENT WRONG WITH THIS CONTAINER? || Justice Court EP 142
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 01. 2023
- ✨SUBSCRIBE TO THIS CHANNEL✨ by clicking the subscribe button. Click on the BELL ICON as well so you can get notification when next video is uploaded.
💕PLEASE SHARE THIS VIDEO💕 with others and support #thejusticecourt efforts in changing lives. Thanks
CONNECT WITH US for more
Instagram - thejusticec...
Facebook - / the-justice-court-8832...
Twitter - / thejusticecour1
TikTok - vm.tiktok.com/ZMefQrt9n/
Website - thejusticecourt.com/
Whatsapp / Call - +234 805 983 7472 - Zábava
To be a judge is not an easy task kudos to judge funmi 👍
Judge Funmi's calmness is topnotch...Her Professionalism is amazing
So many observations!
Yinka's aunty knows somethings, her body language shows it.
Oretide has anger issue, which is why they are smarter than her, why block ur client cos she is insultive, how many of ur clients can u block.
Yinka should know that u win some and loose some, don't try to be smarter than ur teacher, else he will use ur weakness against u and leave u halfway.
Finally, Yinka should let go of this issue cos she got everything, except that there was alcohol there, she should use this as a learning curve and forge ahead. As for Oretide, if u know u don't want to eat meat, don't use ur teeth to share it. Next time, if customers don't buy everything from u, warn the customers and let them know that anything that happens to their containers, they will bear the consequences. I pray Judge Funmi handles this case with wisdom.
Thank you for your response, you just broke it down . Waiting on judge Funmi.
😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
😊
I have learnt a lot from this video. It is an eye opener. May God grant Judge Funmi the wisdom to decode this confusion called " Container Business 🙏.
😅😅 😅 😅😂😢😢
Anger indeed is a small madness, even in my handbag business, I cannot have peace, until the client orders has gotten to them...
I think this is one of the most difficult but interesting case on the show. God bless the Honourable Judge. More wisdom Ma
I have gone through all comment before I decide what to say, critically the Judge needs to ask few question and needed to be backup with evidence
1. Was there anything else in the container, parked with a BROWN CARTON and A GREEN GLASS BOTTLE, how was the HONEY PARKED?
2. Did Yinka's ant show up on the last day of loading or was she present every time they loaded the container?
3. Did Yinka/her Husband inform (date) Oretide when they learned that the shipment had arrived in the US?
4. When were they made aware that the package contained ALCOHOL? When did they learn that there will be shipping container examination?
5. When did Yinka or her husband (date) actually see the goods? Was it after the ALCOHOL'S DESTRUCTION? When did they inform Oretide that alcohol was discovered in the shipment? She also noted that the beans weren't separated and a BOTTLE of honey was gone, was it AFTER OR BEFORE YOU told Oretide about alcohol
6. Were Yinka or her husband ever seen the alcohol bottle weather images or video before they were destroyed, or were they just shown this image (of the broken glass bottle) shown in court?
7. Yinka: HOW MANY PARKS of ALCOHOL BOTTLES WERE FOUND? Did the US customs officer rearrange or offload the goods in the container for inspection? Was it discovered inside (at the back of the container), in the middle, or by the door?
8. Oretide: Did you completely fill the container with nothing no space left? Did you take pictures on the last day of loading to send to Yinka? Can you recall when and where you filled the honey bottle?
This questions will give clear picture of how this happened and question 7 & 8 tell us who loaded and how the ALCOHOL got into container.
If the questions are answered honestly and with sufficient evidence, neither Oretide nor Yinka need to tell us the truth because both of you will lose. For example, if Oritide can lose her shipping licence to the US, why would she load contraband? However, if Yinka is only losing some money for the destruction of the contraband ALONE, this reveals who is playing the game.
AWESOME JUDGE FUNMI, It unfortunate that this is the way I will learn about a great business opportunity without spending money or attending a class. MA GIVE YOUR VEDIT!!!!!!
According to the defendant(from the first episode) the missing honey and branded stickers were reported 2months before the alcohol was reported. And that's so suspicious. She said she didn't want to disturb Oredite that's why she didn't report immediately. 🤨 so it looks like she's now ready to disturb 2🤷♀️
If a thief knows he will be killed if caught why will he go to steal? This matter can't be easily judged so 4get ur logic ppl do n undo in this world....
With no sentiment, everyone who loaded that container regardless of "relationship or whatsoever" should have been standing in the defense box and not only Oritide...
You are so right Solomon
My point exactly
Everyone that supplied goods to that container should be in court !
Well you may be right, mind you it’s a busy market will you go and call a road side Abero to come to cult for a job he probably had forgotten when he did it?
@@EmmyPerry07 reason why she should have used trusted vendor for such a delicate job.
Justice has to prevail but both parties do know what they talking about...
This is one of the sensible comments I have seen here
Alu if they both know then why are they in court? Knowledge is Power.
Lot of lessons to learn here
1. First, the problem started when different suppliers were asked to bring goods instead of Oretide alone. Had it been she was the only one who sourced for the goods in Nigeria, she could have easily been held responsible.
2. Second, what happened during the process of loading? Could it be that those who loaded the container did a mix up or something because this always happen in our everyday lives. Mix ups always occur in businesses that has to do with moving things.
3. Third, I think Oretide got vexed with their attitude at a point when she was checking the goods brought for her and that sort of affected thorough checking of other things that was brought from other sources. It such a pity 🤦🏽♀️
Oretide is at fault forget that fact that goods comes from different sources but, Oretide loaded the container and later she stop picking her this two points alone disqualified Oretide
@@joejoe2365 how is she at fault? So she should be opening all the packages one after the other that the owners won't frown at it ?
@ayodejioyeleye7802 that was their agreement to load the container and she was paid for it
@@ayodejioyeleye7802 what if there was drug in what was brought to her, won't she check to be safe
@@ayodejioyeleye7802 I totally disagree with your point here that, Should Oretide start to open everything she received one after the other? Yes she should if she want to be thorough with her work, now she's been held responsible for what we're not sure if she package in the container or not because she didn't do her work thoroughly.
Wow, this case is really an eye-opener. I liked when the judge asked the oretide lady if it was her first time in the business of exporting. She said no, it's her 2nd time, meaning she still does t have the experience.
The oretide lady is looking tensed to avoid paying 3.5M, but I still feel she still has something shady.
Lol... Shady? How? Someone that has been as transparent as anything is shady?
@ohesoisa ohiorenoya let's wait till the judgment day.
Let really wait. That document need to verify. I leave in Sweden, you can not destroy bottles like that ( on the floor)??? Use Government destroy bottles on the floor like that without recycle or destroy it with machine?
@@evansomoruyi6135 Thank you ooo.
I think what actually annoys oretide is her not purchasing up to 90% as agreed by her costumer
As someone who has been into international trade and have little knowledge about trade laws. I know that there's usually a Statute of Limitation on when a customer can raise concerns or take legal steps on damaged goods or contrabands received from an exporter..
Which is why I keep asking
1. Why did it take the Plaintiff 2 whole months to report something that got her a Federal warning after first complaining about missing honey (which turned out to be a lie) and then branded stickers then destruction of alcohol that cost you 3.7million? Which means before the container was released you paid for destruction of contraband and went further to offload before complaining about missing honey so you overlooked such amount for 2 months because you didn't want to disturb your supplier? It sounds to me like they knew the source of the alcohol(or maybe not) and knew it couldn't have been Oretide either(since she breached the initial agreement) and then thought it was something they could handle but turned out it wasn't and then decided not to be the only ones to go down for it.
2. I have a problem with Oretide trying to grow her brand by sticking with a client that didn't comply with her terms and conditions at her own detriment by agreeing to load a container you didn't completely source(Which is why i strongly doubt that a young lady trying to grow her brand will purchase contraband with her own money to export) and then getting into a heated argument that made you block your client, then refusing to release your FDA number for the container to be cleared so why did you allow the number to be used to load? How do you expect it to be cleared?... From the very beginning you have no business releasing your number... That's negligence on her part....
3. I think other vendors whose goods were loaded should be questioned because clearly, she didn't scrutinize everything so it possible there's a mix-up somewhere..
4. The US customs usually have a video of destruction of items as evidence incase of any legal battle against them....Even Nigerian customs does too. So I'd love a video evidence...
However, Judge Funmi as usual is asking the right questions...
That's the result when two smart people transact a business. One will always try to proof smarter😊😊😊 . The case may even be dismiss
Absolutely. The two play smartness
Please make Una no stress our Honorable Judge the two of them knows who’s lying and this Oretide Miss is not straightforward I think 😢
I will respond to this as a business person myself.It’s much easier to keep a returning customer than get new customers.
There’s no reason why oretide will use her money to buy alcohol and load in her customers container.even though what she bought is one naira , the question is what will be her gain ?
There’s no evidence the alcohol was actually in the container except there will be more documentation to support this.
And again why is the other supplier not been held to ransom.
In my opinion ..
It sounds very suspicious that it took the plaintiff 8 weeks to inform Oretide that she found alcohol that she didn’t pay for …
But she complained about honey and never mentioned alcohol….
The origin of the alcohol is GHANA . I checked it myself … club beer .
When you had an initial agreement with the defendant , why did you switch half way ?
All the suppliers that supplied goods loaded in that container should be sued as well .
Upon receiving and opening your container why didn’t you make a video or picture . Of the alcohol in the container? That would have been a perfect evidence
God bless you !!!
@@sulaimonsaidat3357 very very
Something fishy is going on..
If truly such was found she should have been notified immediately.
As a business person you also forget to asked the important question why didn’t she check the whole container since she is one responsible for loading and sending it.
@@MrCollins2000 you are talking like this because you don’t have any idea how big a container is.
So he will be opening all boxes one after the other.have you considered the time that will take ?
Was she paid for inspection ?
Judge Funmi needs to ask the woman that loaded the container for what we call the PACKING LIST. This is an official document needed to ascertain the contents of the container and it is compulsory to declare this . I live in Australia and this is what I have been doing for the past 6 years. I think she’s not telling the whole truth. I can even see that she’s a bit nervous.
She is just bitter that the lady did not source 90percent of the items from her as earlier discussed amd decided to be vengeful. She was paid to be responsible for the loading, which she admitted that she did not properly do. That is negligence on her part and she should shoulder that of the damages.
Yinka though should have learnt the business first by allowing ireti to do the first sourcing and shipping and then take it up from there but she was playing smart I guess to cut cost.
...but how do we explain that they only contacted Oretide two months after destruction of the contraband?
No one keeps quiet after spending that much on destroying contrabands that he/she had no prior knowledge of.
I can't wait to hear the judgement on this case.
What a case!! Very eye-opening. In this 2nd part, I believe the plaintiff and her family. Oretide admitted that she did not check everything that was delivered to her. She said how can she be checking everything? 17:55 24:00 She also said that once contraband is in the container and once everything is not sourced from her, she won't use her FDA, yet paper work was 100% in her name 13:20. In this 2nd part, I'm standing by the plaintiff. Oretide also seems to be angry that though they agreed for them to buy 90% of the goods from her, they only bought 25% from her 24:00. She has very poor customer service because she blocked her customer and her aunt 20:45 22:44. To me, Oretide is at fault. She has done this only once prior to the plaintiff's, yet before being asked her history with exporting to US, she kept on saying she knows the business. She's a newbie trying to appear like she's been exporting to the US for years 22:59. Can't wait for the verdict.
Got to be extremely careful and prayerful when dealing with Nigerians 🇳🇬 either in Nigeria or outside. Such a negative image.
Great analysis and good point T-Girl👍🏼
Agreeable but on the ground of her experience on exporting she has been exporting before to other countries but for the u.s its once before yinka's
@@victorowu7879 othrr countries doesn't mean she's experienced about US. Every country has their own rules and regulations.
She still brought someone to collect almost 1M from them by false and by crook. She's a very bad person and only concerned about her own gain. Why would you send the shipment in your name? She's a thief
This your judgement doesn’t tally at all, she doesn’t mean she has been sending to USA only, she meant she has been exporting to other countries, let’s wait and see the rest of the story before concluding
Madam anyone could have done that not just Nigerians
It's so unfortunate that this is happening, my grandmother of blessed memory had a saying that " don't ever try to know road more than the person leading you on trip you've never plied before". Overtake overtakes overtaking.
Yinka was trying to play smart
Asiri
@@aladeojebiifeoluwa5881 I disagree ma because Oretide loaded the container & has access to container alone! she can't mistake Carton of indomie to Alchohol,afterall the alcohol where in bottles,so those bottles could have sounded if they taught it was indomie the aunty brought for them to load.
God bless never do as if know than your teacher make she use that first shipment scam you as far you items reach you successful the second we never be like that I think from there you cloud have know all the necessary documents you need but your first time you wanna do as if you know than the person then never show her now
@@aladeojebiifeoluwa5881 you got it dearie, that is the " overtake overtaking overtake ". It is always dangerous.
Why do they go into such a complex agreements without signature and proper legal oversight. As someone who has some experience in UK shipping law, this is so messy. They always want to cut corners and end up spending double.
Olaritide______knows about the alcohol in the container, that's how they did, they will load to you something you did not purchased, after you successfully clear the container with unknown risk, the owner of the alcohol will call you and start telling you that he's coming to carry his alcohol and Olaritide will also call you to inform you that she used the remaining space in the container to load the alcohol so that it won't be a wasted space, for you to accept payment from the owner of the alcohol in USA.
Olatide will be well paid by the owner of the alcohol and the owner of the container will be compasated. That's their GAME
Exactly she loaded the container she had an inkling she assumes all risks until the container gets into the hands of the customer. Pay the lady
So oretide would go to Ghana to buy alcohol with her money, so it could be destroyed in the USA? goolge the name of the alcohol , CLUB BEER
Very smart person …. Did oretide also stop the plaintiff from reporting the discovered alcohol immediately it was seen ? Why did yinka wait for 8 weeks before reporting to oretide ? But she complained about honey a month after , did she forget about the alcohol or tried to conceal it ?
The defendant responsibility was to double check all that was brought to her. For her to say she couldn't check all cartons to know what's inside is negligence cos the plaintiff must have paid her for loading the truck.
exactly! it is also suspicious for her not to have double checked it last minute. She checked everything else but last minute
A response to cover her shades
Part of the lessons here is that the services of lawyers should be developed in Nigeria. We often enter into agreements without legal considerations and backings. The result is that things get messed up and everyone gets bruised when things go wrong.
Ma i have being doing shipping for a long time why will they hold the young lady responsible when you loaded some goods and she loaded some this kind of business should and must be handled by one person no matter what am not trying to justify anyone but some customers like to dey do over Sabi and smart imagine some goods are even loaded in apapa after her own loading
After watching d whole vedio..
Oretide body language and her psych seems telling me she knew about it
This is a very interesting case May Allah continue to guide the Judge in dispensing justice
Vote Peter Obi for better governance
@@dreo6769 we don't care. Whoever wins let them win
@@florahangel1718 care ohh for your children children. Don't be foolish
I think the shipping company has a big role to play in explaining how their ship managed to stop over in Ghana, whereby alcohol was loaded in an already laden container. They need to explain how the locks to the container were breached, and someone somewhere managed to load contraband items (which probably had already been singled out for destruction at the Ghana Sea Port) and perhaps, had taken out some legitimate goods and replaced them with the alcohol.
If padlocks were used to secure the container, Oretide, being the defendant, should be able to tell from pictorial evidence, any differences in the locks on the container when it finally arrived in the US.
The agreement for Oretide to load 90% of the goods on the container was already breached ab initio, and more or less voided the transaction. This alone could have brought about some degree of resentment in her towards her client, besides the subsequent insults from both Olayinka and her aunt. Any other transaction would just be fulfilling all righteousness.
The plaintiff, Olayinka Emmanuel alongside her husband and the Aunt cannot be blameless, as they all failed to sing out in time about having found alcohol in their consignment. It took them almost two whole months to reach out to the defendant, even when they clearly had the breakdown of the contraband items on paper, officially and also had along the line, gone ahead to pay for its outright destruction.
How would you destroy contraband goods without reaching out to the person who supposedly shipped them in the first place, simply because your relationship had already suffered some strain? If the husband still had open access to the defendant, Oretide, he should simply have raised a lot of dust while the case was still hot, except if they know something we don't, and don't want to reveal.
Both parties (the plaintiff and the defendant) in my opinion are being economical with the truth. They are only treading with caution, and just wouldn't want to assume full responsibility for any of their lapses and shortcomings, so that neither of them would eventually take the fall for service rendered unsatisfactorily.
May God grant Judge Funmi the necessary wisdom to unearth the truth about this case and bring it to a final wrap.🙏
The judge should look in that direction as well
@@Adesimisoluwa Definitely.
Let really wait. That document need to verify. I leave in Sweden, you can not destroy bottles like that ( on the floor)??? Use Government destroy bottles on the floor like that without recycle or destroy it with machine?
@@evansomoruyi6135 u right. as a matter of fact they could sieze all the container for good. someonw had a contraband (i dont know till data what it was) in a container i had my family clothing and document for a wedding. They siezed all the container and destroyed everything inside. i explained and explained that mine was just clothing and documents, They disaagreed ooo
@@Adesimisoluwa that’s is not judge fumni problem. The case is between the vendor and the lady. Also is the vendor responsible to sue the shipping company not the lady
This case is delicate, yet so messy. It's unfortunate how bad our people have become. May GOD give Judge Funmi the wisdom needed to unravel the truth and deliver a fair judgement on this one
Oretide, did the loading of the alcohol just becos the lady in US tak rudely to her according to what she said Nd beside, alcohol is legal in Nigeria therefore,she will not be hold accountable here but the person in Us will be involved in order to loose.
Finally v, oretide did it in return to the insult she claim the uptown girl did to her.
@@michaelmichael5390 exactly my mind
@@michaelmichael5390 exactly
@@michaelmichael5390 I quite agree with you sir,because they have NDP issue already,moreso she did the loading of everything supplied to her & have the lock.Can carton of Indomie & keg of palmoil be mistaken with carton of Bottled Alcohol?Because Bottle will sound in carton now!
@@Oshakz when someone is trying to put you true for something you don’t know anything about if before and you trying to play smart than the person if it you what did you do let her scam you first the next shipment we never be like that just use that first time play alone whit know all the necessary documents you need as far she never did it before
This case is simply, you loaded a container, you are responsible to check everything. What ever is found in the container that is not what she asked for, you are responsible
Every supplier that supplied goods should be taken to court not only oretide …..how do you expect to open up 200 cartons of Indomie ? Does oretide have a scanner to scan drugs ? Why did it take the plaintiff Yinka 2 months to complain . After spending 3.7million on behalf of oretide ? Why did you not inform oretide immediately the alcohol was discovered?
A lot of suppliers loaded the container …. All the supplier are Ment to be in court . Not just oretide
Not if Oretide checks it and gives the plaintiff a confirmation. Remember when she mentioned that anyone who brings stuff-goldenmore, elubo, etc Oretide checks it, make s a video and send s the confirmation that she got what the plaintiffs supplier sent. I don’t think anything got inside the container without the knowledge of Oretide the shipper.
You are right,
That’s actually incorrect. Her contract was not to inspect the goods. Nothing went missing from the order. She kept the plaintiff informed with everything that was delivered. She loaded the container. Plaintiff chose to use multiple sources. When you order something to be sent through DHL, they don’t inspect the good your delivery. They just ensure it’s delivered
I think Oretide was not happy because they didn’t bought everything from her.🤷
So because she’s not happy , unhappiness made her buy alcohol with her money ? Unhappiness made the plaintiff complain of alcohol after 2 months ? Unhappiness made the plaintiff spend 3.7m on her behalf and tell her after two months
@@Hajara318 You should know what human being can do and the extent they can go if they’re mean or unhappy with you.
@@Hajara318 the heart of woman is desperately wicked, who can understand it.
Judge Funmi is so full of wisdom... May the vindicate the culprit, very delicate matter.
Oretide can't load what she's not paid for because those drinks costs money and not free
You right
Those drinks don’t only cost money , but they are only sold in Ghana . Yinka is doing something fishy
My question is: 1. What was the numbers of the goods that left Nigeria and the numbers that arrived U.S ?
2. Does the cartons of the alcoholic drinks have same company name with the alcoholic bottles?
3. What are the companies names of the cartons goods bought by the complainant before they were loaded by the defendant?
The alcohol is from Ghana you can check , it’s CLUB BEER
Club beer can found it way to Nigeria. There is a business going on between the two countries. It is not something impossible to be loaded in Nigeria.
May God grant Judge Funmi wisdom to unravel the mystery in this case .
I'm not a judge but my carnal knowledge as long as they brought things from outside and she loaded it .D USA lady should face the lost and learn a lesson
Very true
THIS IS A VERY DIFFICULT CASE TO HANDLE, MAY GOD ALMIGHTY GIVE YOU WISDOM TO SETTLE THIS CASE AMEN.
Lesson to Learn when you want to start a business you know nothing about. Let your the person you are doing the business with be in charge of everything for the first try. You will spend alot but will learn the process. Very important. Short cuts will resolve to this...
She was trying to cut cost
Your Honor Good Evening! I am a Psychologist and have watched the whole Video now here are my observations.
1: The Dealer from Nigeria knew exactly the Field of Business in exports and was the only one with the Locks of the container.
2: The fact that she wasn’t the only one bringing in items in the container, would have made her check the packages more Carefully to avoid Wahala , if it was a case of drugs by now she will be having bigger issues.
3: There are chances of her wanting to cut a side deal from another client to top up the Gain on her own side since she knew exactly that the container was half way loaded.
Now the name of the Alcohol or origin of the alcohol isn’t a key point, simply because Many people export different goods to the overseas.
4: No other Person had access to the Container, when the container was been closed she should have video recorded the closing of the container.
She knew how she will avert the case when issues follows up simply because she’s in the game for Long.
5: From the records they both have alcohol wasn’t included in it, which could state in my view that the client is on a safe side because she wouldn’t magically put the alcohol in there.
What ever happened to that container could be from Nigeria 🇳🇬.
6: From the pictures in the video showed in court the alcohol was in a Bottles then packed in a Carton.
How would you inspect cartons and packages without hearing the Bottle Sounds?
Correct me when I am wrong but I believe that even in a Crate Bottles make sounds.
7: The client Needs to show a prof of the Documents sent to her in USA 🇺🇸 before they destroyed the alcohol.
One Good thing about overseas is that the don’t joke will Mail ✉️ and Post, especially in matters like this.
On the Clint: Your Huge Mistake was not calling back to quickly inform your dealer of the issues at hand and waited for more than a Month.
Giving the facts that the Law authorities over there are holding you accountable, a video also was expected.
2: You had access still with your sister and so when your dealer wasn’t responding what stopped you from asking your sister to visit her shop ones more? Since when things were moving cool she was at her shop to inspect and deliver items to her.
With this in mind; i feel the cost should be a shared value between them both. With the Dealer paying more of the percentage.
Business isn’t a toy to play with, especially when it comes to exportation , we know that our people could close their eyes on some issues, but that isn’t allowed out there (We be 9ja).
In her own words in the First Video the dealer Mentioned that she had to clean 💰 some Hands, 5k,10k & 20k.
As an accredited Exporter you have the whole documents and access of exporting the goods, since you have charged your Clients.
The hands you washed what exactly was it for?
God Bless you Your Honor!
Watching from Germany 🇧🇪.
'Hand-washing' is a big problem in Naija. Bail, for example if free, but you ain't getting out without 'hand-washing' or knowing some big shot. 'Receiptless' payments to officials everywhere.
It's possible she intentionally ignored telling them the alcohol will cause them problems because she was angry. She just wanted to punish them.
Dear Judge Funmi, we love all that you do, I pray you see this comment, believe me my husband is a top barrister in Nigeria and I hear crazy cases, you see this Mrs olayinka case ehhh, it so clear that they only want to strike on oretide, they got someone to do those documents, truth me ma, even if you contact USA directly it will be documented that there was alcohol in the container, why, because the plaintiff got an insider in usa to get it done, more reason why she didn't contacted oretide early because they have to secure the document, this plaintiff is playing a dirty game, so sad even young Nigerian can't do better and make us proud home and abroad, oretide I don't know you but we have been following up with this case and this episode shows that the plaintiff planned a revenge. What will be her gain loosing a new customer, will the plaintiff pay her for the alcohols, I'm scared of exportation because my hubby client loaded his own container himself just for them to find hard drug in USA, that was when I knew there is a master key to so many locks. But this particular case is setup by the plaintiff, why will honey come first before alcohol? How much is honey?
You are really a woman with kind heart ❤️..GORG fummi
May god bless you
If you travel they always ask did you pack your suitcase. If something is found you cannot now say my best friend helped me pack. She needs to be held accountable as she was the one meant to be doing the checks regardless of where it is sourced from.
No way. She cannot check all the items. If your travelling, and your bus is loaded with good, will check all the contents? The owner takes responsibility
I think Oretide did some shady things in that container just to prove to them that she knows the business more.
And then Oretide stopped them from complaining immediately they discovered it , it took them 2 months to complain … doesn’t that sound suspicious?
They went ahead and spent 3.7m on behalf of Oretide without telling her . That’s so suspicious
In my opinion ..
It sounds very suspicious that it took the plaintiff 8 weeks to inform Oretide that she found alcohol that she didn’t pay for …
But she complained about honey and never mentioned alcohol….
The origin of the alcohol is GHANA . I checked it myself … club beer .
When you had an initial agreement with the defendant , why did you switch half way ?
All the suppliers that supplied goods loaded in that container should be sued as well .
Upon receiving and opening your container why didn’t you make a video or picture . Of the alcohol in the container? That would have been a perfect evidence
@@sulaimonsaidat3357 my exact sentiments.
Exactly
@@sulaimonsaidat3357 They are both guilty. Why would someone load a container that you know you would put your name on without checking all the goods? What if it was hard drugs that they found in the container, won't they pick up the sender too?
Lack of sincerity is lurking somewhere in the relationship.
Judge Funmi. I love you ma. I'm learning a lot here as I aspire to engage in food exportation business. More wisdom I pray for you.
How can you load a container without checking the content of what you are loading, wether she bought from other sources or not you are supposed to check the content of what was delivered to you before loading it up in the container, knowing fully well the procedure,rules and implications of exporting..na wa o, humans and money
Are you kidding
No one can do that
The only thing you can reall check is the access granted to the container and to whom
i think when she told that pomo and snails etc were contrabands the problem started, the Emmanuel's import snails oretide didn't want to export in the same container.
@@victorowu7879 Do what?
That alcohol is not even available in the Nigerian market ...... it still seem a mystery cause oretide doesn’t sell alcohol.... and the plaintiff insisted not buying alcohol
Why did the plaintiff wait for 2 months before she informed the defendant ? Seem like an after thought to me
The alcohol never existed
How will you claim that you found Ghana alcohol n container that Lagos, the defendant has her blame but you are also trying to incriminate her, the plaintiff should stop lying
Great point
Thank you judge Funmi,you're indeed a very compassionate judge,not in a hurry to judge anyone without adequate scrutiny and evidences. I think oretide did some shady things with the container. All the best to both of them..
If oretide did something shady. Did she also stop yinka from complaining immediately alcohol was found? Did she tell the plaintiff not to speak up untill aftet twp months?
@@queenesther9239 that's not the point at least it has been established that alcohol was in the container. I think Orietede knows exactly what she was doing. You know she won't be able to clear the goods without your FDA then why allow contraband goods only the container instead ? Orietede was trying to extort this lady more and when she wasn't complying she decided to punish her instead. That's my take on this
@@davidlee7928 I’m of the same opinion!
@@davidlee7928 who bought alcohol initially? This is the question to be asked
@@davidlee7928 On point
And that’s wickedness
Is obvious this woman just want trouble. How come u clear container December and just discovering alcohol by February. The judge know the truth I believe.
You are very right the plaintiff is a trouble some woman
She just wants trouble
In my opinion ..
It sounds very suspicious that it took the plaintiff 8 weeks to inform Oretide that she found alcohol that she didn’t pay for …
But she complained about honey and never mentioned alcohol….
The origin of the alcohol is GHANA . I checked it myself … club beer .
When you had an initial agreement with the defendant , why did you switch half way ?
All the suppliers that supplied goods loaded in that container should be sued as well .
Upon receiving and opening your container why didn’t you make a video or picture . Of the alcohol in the container? That would have been a perfect evidence
Great job JC
I have a strong feeling that Oretide is sheddy simply because she wasn't contracted to load the whole container. We pray for wisdom
Very correct u spoke my mind
I think so too
The deal has already been broken when the plaintiff started buying things from other people.... Any other thing found in that container the defendant will not be held liable, cos at that point she no longer knows what is packed or not even if she repackaged some goods or not. Everyone who packed anything in that container should be held liable for the damage
God bless
You're a very wise woman
I think that in business matters, all information should be communicated by Email so there is a clear trail with all the information in one place. I think social media is called that for a reason, at best you can send messages via Social Media to alert the other party when you've sent information by email.
To be frank, I think the alcohol got into the container by mistake, but the onus was on Iretide to check or get one of her staff to randomly inspect all items that went into the container. For instance: if one of the 19 cartons containing alcohol had been inspected, it would've alerted her to check the rest.
I look forward to the concluding episode. Well done Justice Funmi, great shows every time, with valuable lessons for all who care to learn!!!!
Did Yinka pay her for inspection? No she paid her for loading.
@@ayi2636 You can conveniently say she paid for inspection and loading. She complained on ponmo and snails
Ladies!!!! Let's work and do business without emotions. Whatever the outcome Oretide has some very good values. If you are in business with people always pick up the phone alright.
Nslsnkkkldnslrjdjrkdj4jkrkrlnrkrbrlrnrkbrkrnjrllkjkjnrdlrnlftlprjtlrprrl ppl nskrkrnrkdirjdirjdirfioszz4j 29:48
Please you guys should give us the concluding part of this series oo…it’s so investing
A very big lesson to be learn in this case 🤔
There is no way u will not know alcohol was loaded because the Bottle of the alcohol will definitely make noise when being loaded. This girl is wicked and shouldn’t be patronized again
The plaintiff knows something about the container for sure cause why'd you inform the loader 2months after the goods have gotten to you and no evidence of the the alcohol in the container just when it's been destroyed, also why will someone ship an alcohol from Ghana with her own money to Nigeria cause she wanted a revenge?
Why complain about honey first ? Is that more important than alcohol?
You are so damn right
Why wait for two month to tell her
You actually paid for destruction of alcohol on oretides behalf and you never informed her? How reasonable
She actually waited for a whole 8 weeks before informing oretide ….. that sounds very SUSPICIOUS
The plaintiff added the alcohol her self if not why did it take her two months to declare?
How’s that possible when she’s clearly not in Nigeria
I’m not sure you’re following up
She actually could
@@oluwaseunjimoh2204 how??
If the other lady here in Nigeria will leave the container will she not lock the container Abi how she wan get acress to am?
Diaspora doing biz with people back home is difficult
Club beer in cartons are quite visible and cannot be mistaken for golden morn in cartons just on a weight by weight basis.
Was that why she kept quite for two months ? And accused of missing honey before alcohol which she claimed she got federal warning for ????? Haba!!!!! Did oretide also stopped her from speaking ?
@@Hajara318 my comments are about the facts shown to us in the loaded videos so I can't speak about the timing of getting back to Oretide. The judge should ask about why it took them so long to inform Oretide about the issue.
@@Hajara318 2months?For the container delivered in Dec 22nd,then before she'll settle out of Custom in U.S,do you think is one day Job?Before she'll write Justice court & they'll call in her case.I worked with the date she mentioned that the container arrived not her mouth saying of 2months but we need to follow the dates as they're both explaining what transpired
I think the lady was angry dey bought things them self n wanted them to spend the money dey where trying to save…. She knows exactly what she is doing.
Then you think she would go to ghana, buy Ghana drinks with her money to be destroyed in usa? Think well
@@queenesther9239 my Dear THINK WELL N READ CLEARLY. I never said she put the drink in there. I only pointed my Observation of why she showed less attention to it. Did you not HEAR Her say I WAS TO PROVIDE 90%. Of the goods but I ONLY SUPPLIED 25% of it which I believed was her Anger… that was my area of Observation. Try use very good Earpiece or pod to listen to it wel… talking about the drinks she could have also put it after all it was very small Quantity was found in there she has the keys to the container too.
Ghana sell goods in Nigeria too..just like kente is made in ghana and u can see kente in Nigeria..so ghana drink can be bought in Nigeria..don’t you wear made in china outfit in Nigeria..
If Oretide could point out kpomo, snail n etc as contraband, there is no how in my own opinion she would have loaded alcohol knowing they belong to the same category, the complainant's ego and anger issue could not allow her to be well guided
Exactly!
Exactly she’s an exporter she won’t do that
Did complainant load the container, you no well
@@Kutie500 in your opinion you think we both will come here to troll words, I think you are not up to that with your myopic reasoning
At the end of this case arguments, it’s base on the alcohol being loaded by oretide or not.. Ok but how can oretide loaded the alcohol when she knows fully well the FDA it’s on her business name and the implication of doing such? 2, can we now say the plaintiff was the one that sneak in the alcohol into their own container? But one thing I know was that it will be stupid idea for oretide to shipped a contraband that wasn’t even paid for into the container on her name, risking of forfeiting her license 🤔. SOMEONE IS LYING DEFINITELY.
The plaintiff is a thief .if not why did she claim she spent 3.7m to destroy alcohol and not inform oretide ? No visible evidence of alcohol in the container . Just a destruction paper . No usa custom document
The alcohol is from Ghana I checked too
@@sulaimonsaidat3357 but does that mean it can’t be found in Nigeria market?
The plaintiff can't plant alcohol in her counter. The custom will have to clear the container so clearly that thing was planted from oretide side either by one of the people loading. It possible they re doing it to punish the oretide lady. Becus this lady has anger issues it possible she must have offended someone who want to deal with her
I feel the case of the alcohol was planned by the plaintiff just to get back at Oretide for not giving her FDA number like why would Oretide export alcohol made in Ghana to the USA it doesn’t make sense
It actually took her 2 months to plan all this against oretide
Alcohol made in Ghana is sold in Nigeria so everything is possible
Everything is possible
Madam its a lie Oretide acted carelessly with the other goods that was brought later she didnt want to repack,if they had used her FDA she would have done throughly checking and she knows verywell that the stuff are going to the USA they will do checkings so why didnt she check everything and repack them herself ,its just because she feels less concerned you know how yoruba market people can be ,if its was an igbo lady she will not do that and besides she is still new to the market she made a very big mistake
Oretide shouldn't have been paid upfront for her to use Form NXP.
This is really a tricky one to judge
So tricky..
I think the issue started with clear communication between both parties
Oretide should have taken the time to check everything she was loading and also have poor customer service
Your correct cos am sure if it was her FDA that was used she would have checked everything. For me her excuse of not been able to check everything is rubbish and suspecisions.
Register with Nigerian Export Promotion Council , attend online and offline capacity building workshops, before you export , Export is technical and you need to be skilled to export.
Communicate skills is key
She didn’t explain to me😂😂😂. You act like you know too much
Very smart judge👩⚖️ both parties played a role in ds misfortune…byn her first time in ds business she deff will go thru sm losses.
To me oretide is guilty guilty guilty😁
Oretide is Guilty! She knows the tricks of the business. The lady is a novice and a first timer.
When you are dealing with two people that can talk
I see the guilt in Oratide's eyes
But she might not be the one oo. And she might be the one. But I feel she will be responsible because she was the one that loaded it.
@@abukiniovo9933 a first timer you say but pays deaf ears when told things that are contrabands.. even if the officials indicates that as been contraband will they bring the papers for that.... If you are new then yield to advise of pros in the business..... She only felt the lady purchasing everything for her will be quite expensive... Even if at that you Go on... When everything is successful then you understand better etc make more research and you can then start using your own documents.... She knows she can't export by not been registered so how do expect her to use hers and still wants to use her FDA to clear... She just wanted to be smart
Something else that Judge Judy does is to present the case to a team of experienced and junior lawyers who would go through all the points and bring out all the highlights so the judge doesn't have to do all this work during screen time
If the alcohol was found by USA Customs, there was no way it could have been planted by the plaintiff because you don't have access to content of a container until it is released by customs. So the alcohol got into the container before it arrived in the US.
Was that why it took her 2 months to tell the defendant about it ? Even after accusing her of missing honey ? Which was more important contraband or honey ?
Yinka has no documentation from USA customs certifying they found alcohol , what was shown was a recycle document …. Go back and watch properly …. Also she’s meant to provide video or pictorial evidence in court …. Not destruction pictures
@@Hajara318 my comments is about the process of gaining access to an imported container so I can't say anything about the time lag.
@@Hajara318 the judge admitted a letter emanating from the US customs as evidence. It had the container number on it which Oretide confirmed as correct.
We need proper documentation directly from USA before we can believe the plaintiff.
I feel Oretide couldn’t have loaded alcohol for another client in the US knowing full well that the business has gone sour.
How would she load alcohol only SOLD IN Ghana in a container leaving Nigeria?
Why would it be alcohol only available in ghana
So Oretide would ship alcohol from Ghana with her own money and include it in the container knowing fully well that it'd be destroyed. She even explained contraband items to her and the plaintiff said would cut corners
Unfortunately it doesn’t work that way because she dosent sell alcohol.
And the container solely belong to yinka
We ve goods made from different country in Nigeria
This case is very interesting and an eye-opener.
1. Oretide has mentioned countless times that she didn't source for the entire goods, in fact just 25% (She has a problem with that).
2. She couldn't convince her client not to load snail which she mentions is contraband in the US, thought it was eventually cleared. (She doesn't care).
3. Oretide was convinced that her client would need her FDA to clear the container, yet was not willing to release it at any point (a deliberate attempt to strangle it).
I await the judgement on the ground of evidence even though I'm already convinced that Oretide knows something about the alcohol
Sounds to me like a set-up; all part of the entire game plan. There's a possibility that as a result of the resentment that Oretide had towards her client, she connived with the shipping company to have the container intercepted in Ghana and compromised with the contraband items just to sabotage the consignment, since the supposedly outlawed snails had been cleared and there seemed no other means to get back at the client for all the insults.
To crown it all up, the client had paid Oretide in full, and the bone of contention here had been the Non-Export Proceeds (NXP) from the CBN, which Oretide claimed that she single-handedly took care of.
But, all these would rest with the inquest of the legal team on the activities and involvement of the shipping company around the time of the incident.
The issue I have is that she agreed to load the container. She said she loaded every item including the ones she didn’t source. She even snapped pictures of everything that arrived, counted to make sure they were complete and reported back to the lady. She would have been last to close the container before shipping. I don’t know how she then wants to say she doesn’t know about the ones she didn’t provide. It is either her or the shipping company at fault. Who else would have access to enter the container
@@Yinksz That's where a pictorial evidence of the locks used for the container comes in handy/is key.
If the locks tally with what got to the client when the ship berthed at the US port, then, Oretide might have succeeded in exonerating/absolving herself of any blame due to tamper. However, the onus would now lie on the shipping company to explain what happened to the container while in transit, because there are indeed few locks available on the market that cannot be picked/have proven very difficult for a bandit/wharf rat to pick.
Let's not lose sight of the fact that the Club brand beer in question, made by Accra Brewery Limited, is only available and sold in Ghana. So, the onus now lies on the shipping company to prove themselves or their employees innocent.
Employees of the shipping company may be running clandestine operations whereby they breach locks attached to their containers and then, squeeze additional items into them, only to be intercepted midway, or on immediate arrival at the seaport.
The US Immigration and Border Control has staff members that are highly trained and skilled in intercepting narcotics as well as contraband and outlawed items, especially when they are not declared.
*United States Customs and Border Protection, I meant to say.
Could it also be that the plaintiff smuggled the alcohol in honey bottles? Thereby accusing the defendant of missing honey ? Before alcohol ..... cause the both products are in bottles ?
I am still concerned on why the plaintiff reported honey before alcohol .... that was a federal offense
You’re so observant
Correct 🙌
may God grant you the wisdom of Solomon ma'am to conclude this case
As long as she told her she can't use her FDA, by means of sourcing from other places will go a long way for her in this case... Because even she loads it, is not in her position to open stuffs the owner asked to be added to her container, and what name they call it carton of pack oil etc is what will be written down as what she received not minding what is actually inside... Her deafness even when told that some things she demanded her contraband and still decides for it to be added e.g snails shows she doesn't give a damn about receiving her goods successful knowing you are new to the business
But she was paid to check and load every item, so since they didn't buy everything from her she decided to sabotage them knowing fully well that they will not use her FDA
@@ogonnaokechukwu1761 i disagree with this ideology of yours... She wasn't paid for opening of good before loading whereas the agreement was 90% of sourcing will be from her... Now the owner changed plan and she only source about 25% of total goods, did she pay extra fees to open every package brought in my her various vendors.. she was only greedy thinking if she source the goods buying from her will be more expensive....as a first timer you must be read to spend to under the procedure more clearer and better.. a first timer but yet refused the advised of goods that could been seen as contraband
@@Lordmillionz Ok, but I can't excess her. If I were the judge I will give the judgement 50 50
Good point
@@ogonnaokechukwu1761 waiting anxiously for the verdict 😂😂😂 some cases can be addictive
A case of two smart people, trying to outsmart each other. Olayinka trying to reduce cost while Oretide trying to maximize profit from the deal, by covering the fact that are details would be used to export and collecting NEPC.
The plaintiff cannot rely in the weakness of the defendant's case to prove hers.
This plaintiff has not discharged the burden of proving Oretide loaded contraband.
This is becoming interesting ☺️
For the fact that the US lady discovered what she didn't order for (alcohol), should have appeared strange to her, which was supposed to prompt her to notify the exporter in Nigeria immediately. They kept quiet until after close to two months,i suspect conspiracy to just implicate the exporter. Remember the exporter was already denying to load snails which she suspected could be a problem in US, talk less of alcohol. To me that alcohol was in that container to the notice of the US lady, only that she has spent more than she expected to clear d container because the exporter didn't release her FDA, I see this as a way to get back at the exporter after two months of drafting their plan to nail her.
Exporter's only fault was she failed to check the last loaded goods due to inadequate time. But I strongly believe the US base knows about the alcohol for keeping quiet till two months.
God will give you wisdom Ma, over this matter.
I sense that too , why notify her 2 months after discovering alcohol ?
You might be right
Exactly my point … why wait for 2 months ?
You waited for a whole row months to tell the person that loaded the container that you found alcohol
I was about to ask too why it took them 2 months after clearing a container before complaining about alcohol, but she complained about honey that wasn't missing almost immediately
This issue is really complicated
She knew the plaintiff could not use her FDA yet she made her get it.
Why did you make her get it when you knew it's useless and you will still use your own? I think she loaded the alcohol that was why she refused to release her FDA. She knew it might pass or not depending on the inspection but would not take the risk with her FDA.
I can’t wait for the final part of this
Same here..
It's a tricky one, I pray divine wisdom for the Judge
This case is complicated o! I'm just wondering how justice will be served. Oretide loaded and should've inspected everything before loading knowing fully well that her name was on the documents. As well, her not releasing her FDA number seems to me like a vengeful & vindictive act (I could be wrong though). We'll sha see what happens in the next episode.
Exactly.
I live in the USA and will like to inform you all that the custom officer here had a mixed up and probably the alcohol came in another container from Ghana and
mistakenly pass it onto her container number.
This is a human error at the USA customs clearing.
In cases like this, how can the accused exonerate himself?
Why woul she buy alcohol waste her money to buy alcohol
This Naija American woman is new to Nigerian business. She needs to be thankful to this agent. America no be the end of the world
I pray Judge Fumni confirms the letter as I feel Yinka is lying and trying to implicate Oretide. Any normal person will shout immidiately alcohol is discovered on her container. She complained about honey and kept mute about alcohol for over 2months.
You were meant to talk of alcohol before honey ! And two months is a long time !
That is another valid point, Olayinka needs to confirm, why piece meal complain, not all at once.
I'm an importer too, when you're faced with such challenge the first thing you want to do is solve the problem first bcos the container will be in demorage and continues to accrue fee daily
One other issue that beats me is that whenever there are seizures by the United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP), more often than not, the package/luggage is opened in the presence of the recipient/owner. And all this happens after the package in question must have passed through their ultrasentitive scanners without the need to breach the lock(s) of that package. There are always surveillance monitors and closed circuit monitoring systems in and around the ports, so every detail is more or less captured for record purposes, lest anyone accuse them of planting the contraband item(s) themselves.
When Mr. Bamidele Emmanuel mentioned that the US Customs had phoned to invite them over, it was on a Saturday, and they claimed that they had found alcohol in their container, to which the Emmanuels refuted. 0:28 and 16:00
It really would be unethical for the US CBP to breach the locks of a recipient's package, even when it's high risk without the presence of that recipient in question, and also, provided that the recipient hasn't gone into hiding/is on the run. But then again, I guess in some cases, they reserve the right to do so, especially when the recipient isn't within immediate reach. What the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) would normally do is to first break the locks and then, leave an official document with the breached locks attached, stating that they had carried out an inspection on suspicion of a contraband/illegal item(s).
Well, I also want to believe that all this is based on the fact that the TSA have an already prescribed Guidelines and Procedures document clearly spelt out, in a bid to serve as a forewarning to would-be shippers.
If oretide had sourced the goods there most likely won’t be any inspections for what she bought , cause she alone knew where she bought and knew where it was going …… she alone had full access to the goods ……but immediately you switched to various suppliers you opened up a portal …..
yinka ought to bring all her suppliers to court too ….. any of them could have said anything concerning the container anywhere , thereby exposing the container to ⚠️ danger
She loaded the goods , she should have checked more over it’s her licence if there was hard drugs like coco in that container, it’s her that would have gotten into trouble .
This case is deep but why not contact oretide earlier when they discover alcohol in the container,why contacting her after the destruction of the alcohol.the complainant is not being sincere.
Yes the plaintiff is a thief …. Why would you claim you spent 3.7m to destroy alcohol that was shipped by oretide and never informed her until two months after? But you called her and complained about incomplete honey and never mentioned alcohol? Then come back to say that you found alcohol that is only SOLD IN GHANA . In a container that left Lagos ? The plaintiffs has so much to answer
Yes a thief
What's your interest in this case I see you jumping from one comment to ànother trying to defend the défendant why not use your real name.
Let the judge do the findings and do justice.
You jumping up and down will not change anything.
I pray every hidden secret in this case will be exposed.
You live in the USA and custom called you for such important issue and they waited that long to call oretide. They are just looking for someone to push blame on. Oretide too should learn.
If you have a licence to protect, you will make sure you supervised EVERY goods loaded into that container, you can’t use your name to laid a container and expect a different FDA with another name to clear it , it’s impossible , I believe because of their misunderstanding she refused to release her FDA which is malicious, this is a business transaction, and their should be no sentiments. If their was hard drugs in that container it’s the defendants business that would have been affected and she arrested, if the lady said she will use her own FDA you should have explained to her that it means she, the defendant can’t put her business name on the documents, she has to get her own licence from Nigeria , tell their it’s not possible. The defendant should be held LIABLE to any extra expenses incurred .
Best court ever.. judge funmi... I want to take u shopping
Both parties are culpable. I will have them share the fines payment.
These are the likely scenarios:
1. The defendant, Oretide dropped the ball by not properly inspecting every item that went into the container.
2. Oretide has nothing to gain by purchasing alcohol (with whose money by the way?) and loading it into the container
3. On some occasions, Oretide may have contracted third-parties to load the container because she also have to be in her shop attending to other customers. Using third parties made that container vulnerable to illegal activity in this case alcohol being loaded in by Oretide's client.
4. Since Oretide made it clear ab initio that she cant release her FDA if she doesn't source 90% of the items for that container. She claims she only supplied 25% of the items sourced. The plaintiff claims her US-based agent told her that the container can be cleared without the FDA of the exporter whose business name was used for the shipping documentation.
Verdict:
1. Oretide pays part of the damages (total cost of destroying the alcohol) claimed by the plaintiff due to negligence since she is solely contracted to load AND ship the container. Customs can decide to inspect any container at any time irrespective of contents, therefore Olayinka CANNOT levy that expense on Oretide. Also claims of "missing" items is not factual and will be dismissed unless a solid evidence is presented.
2. Case is dismissed for lacking merit because ignorance is not an excuse wherein the plaintiff claimed her US-agent told her they would be able to clear the container without the exporter's FDA. That letter doesn't look like a document that emanated from United States Customs & Boarder patrol (CBP) or FDA.
Even if oretide contacted third parties to load the container. What would they gain by loading alcohol there? Have they asked the couple for it or did they break into the container to get it? No one said anything about alcohol for at least a month after the arrival of the container.
I don't understand the pitch crimes...or nasty Crimes who loaded alcoholic? Shipping middle man are not to be trusted? Who could be added alcoholic out of jealous?
💜💜👻💜
For the fact that the U.S lady discovered what she didn't other for, should have appeared strange to her, which she was supposed to notify the exporter in Nigeria but they kept quiet close to 2 months, so the U.S lady knows about it,
Exporters only fault was that she didn't check the last loaded goods before departure.
But the last loaded goods which she claimed were packed already n she no check is not even equivalent to the number of alcohol cartons found...... Omo mk we leave Human beings. Heart of man desperately wicked. The only pain here is that their agreement was that she will source 90% of the items but later na only 25% they got from her...that could be enough to generate hatred for the customer. Whatever sha make God always come through for the just. This matter no pure...both ways looking suspecious, the matter needs the kind Wisdom Solomon applied.