The Strongest Country of every century (1st - 21st) Explained In 18 Minutes
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 05. 2024
- 00:00 1st-5th
01:24 6th
02:07 7th
02:44 8th-9th
03:21 10th
04:39 11st
05:51 12nd-13rd
06:28 14th
07:52 15th
09:38 16th
10:45 17th
11:21 18th
12:23 19th
14:24 20th
17:35 21st - Hry
Watch the full Adventure Time story (made by my friends) czcams.com/video/PEpwTl8I3kk/video.htmlsi=eZITcynnGut5cyqL
1:36 byzantium wasnt established by Constantine it was an ancient thracian settlement
The map in 1:46 is a fake , because explain how America appears on it if it had not been discovered yet.
Islam>
12th century: nothing changed
13th century: everything changed💀
yep, Genghis Khan
Cool video man. I like your content a lot
Hidden gem of a channel!
Thank you for informations
Wish you add the military budget for the US but great video!
Great video thank you
🗿🇬🇷Byzantine Empire🤝🗿🇮🇷Sasanian Empire
Rashidun caliphate jumpscare
Thats so nice towatch thanks body!
4:00 the earliest threat fun fact were the hungarians causing raids as west of italy 😮
12:51 "belgium" *circles netherlands* "netherlands" *points to north germany*
LOL
u got a good eye ngl
USA:IF GOD HAD WANTED U TO LIVE HE WOULS NOT HAVE CREATED ME!!!
failed to mention australia, sending a complaint to your parents.
napoleonic Empire
*insert royalist here*
Colonial Empire
*insert napoleon here*
wtf
0:12 0:13 added to my sabaton random images playlist
LOL😭
what bugged me is tye complete neglect of the dutch empire wich was incredibly powerfull during the 1600s they had almsot the entire spice trade, had a HUGE naval fleet (bigger then spain france and england's fleet combined) and ruled various colonies,
The flag of the Confederation of the Rhine had a flag similar to Sierra Leone but with a darker shading
Very good video but I think you can also could mention about Poland-Lithuania Commonwealth if only because in XVII century Commonwealth have terriory from baltic sea to black sea and have a very strong army (Winged Polish Hussars), but the video is still very good :))
Ottoman empire was stronger that's why u guys attacked us from behind
10:44 Qing Dynasty ruled by the Manchurian not The Han
People who don’t watch this video: they won’t learn it
It's always the external issues 💀
+ Internal
But indeed, internal issue was a huge problem for every empires back than
First and Second Bulgarian Empires left the chat
@Atakan-ln2xv your not important to society 😑
@Atakan-ln2xv your mom doesn't love you, your dad left you, your grandma doesn't love you and you'll grow up to be Adam Sandler
3:30 Thats me!
Anyone else notice there’s like 4 channels exactly like this that literally make the exact same videos
Yes
“I have ten million power in rise of kingdoms.”
Very good speech
I think he did a good job explaining the US
Weird that you brought up decolonisation and the downfall of the British Empire in the 18th century, even though that didnt happen until the mid 20th century. Britain's strength and dominance only increased during the 19th century after defeating Napoleon and establishing itself as THE colonial empire in the world. Reaching it's territorial height of around 1/4 of the world's landmass in 1920.
i think he just brings up every countries downfall and here he didn't mean that the British empire fell in the 18th century but rather that at one point it did fall
By 1920 it had already been weakened and increasingly displaced by other countries such as the USA. WW2 ended with the British
The only thing that bugged me was that you didn't talk about the US territorys who aren't "states", but are also part of the united states.
Very good.
Am i the only ONE that thinks America in the thumbnail looks like soldier from tf2?
(R.I.P Rick May)
The Byzantine Empire was my favorite… but I didn’t know that they believed that this what the world was like 💀☠️: 1:45
I don’t think that’s a Byzantine map and fairly legible early modern German is on it so it’s probably from like the 1500s or something
5th century is definitely the huns and 9th would either be the abbasids or the carolangian empire their alliance could’ve easily collapsed Byzantium I don’t think it’s even close
Guptas defeated both Huns and Sassanins
@@parthb.714 they were not much contribution from guptas to defeat huns, there were other small indian kingdoms who expelled hunns from india
Персы одни из самых недооценненных народов ,они сейчас в сложном положении ,но они сного заявят о себе 🇹🇯🇮🇷🇦🇫❤️🔥
Cant tell if this channel is one of those ai content farms or not
The voice seems kinda fake, and there were definitely some AI images in there
it definitely is
The fact pre-columbian civilizations fell was because the same pre-columbians who attacked the mayor civilizations, and 300 horses
Fake
@@Galletas-my3sv fake is your father figure
@@crushingwasledghammer66 Boy, besides, they weren't civilizations, they were states.
You forgot of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, in 17th century it was strongest country in the world that contained 90% of balkans, belarus, ukraine and some part of russia (including moscow 1610-1612) it had almost 1million km² and had scariest army (hussars)
Here comes the people who glazes on middle eastern empires
Why do you explain some parts slowly?
12:34: You used the flag of the late Kingdom of France for the "French Napoleonic Empire." Also, France didn't dominate the 19th century (perhaps the beginning), but it was the British who were dominant. France really peaked during the 17th and 18th centuries. True, the first decade of the 19th century seemed dominated by France, but after Napoleon's defeat, the French made sure to respect the balance of power. By the time Napoleon III rose to power, France was still a great power but not as powerful as during the French and Napoleonic Wars for a number of reasons, notably population decline. Before the Revolution, it was the most populous and most prosperous country in Europe, but all the wars drastically impacted the population. It also didn't help that France was plagued by instability, and they were eventually outclassed by Germany.
Overall, I don't think you can reduce the history of an empire, let alone a country, to only one century.
"ottoman empire was the best country in 16th century"
Meanwhile Ottomans were scared of Poles and losed war with poland
Can you do the same for the bc period? Dehli sultnate replled the mongols and you forgot the Gupta empire who eventually beat back the Huns and was replaced by the rajput kingdoms who stopped both Arabs and Huns and Turks for a while
Sure the Delhi Sultanate repelled the Mongols, but it was like their first point for the standings against the Mongols 20 if you know what I’m saying
@@rkdehart7351 no they also beat the rajput warriors and other rajput kingdoms
@@rkdehart7351 they repelled mongol inversions for a good 100 years
@williamFromBirmingham every Indian empire like Gupta was richer than Europe combined and Gupta was the golden age.
@williamFromBirmingham Gupta was a superpower in the 4th & 5th centuries. They defeated the Huns in Gupta-Hunnic War. These were the same Huns who had completely destroyed the Western Roman Empire. Not only militarily but also they were by far the largest economy in the world. Chess & Zero also originated from the Gupta Empire
I have a question why is Bengal Sultanate isn't consider a superpower in 14th 15th 16th 17th 18th century when it made 12% of global gdp in 14-15th century and 15% in 17-18th century and 3rd largest population and one of the best navy but Russian empire with a population less then even main land France and also poor was a Superpower??
I don't know about the centuries, but I know they didn't exist in the later half of the 18th century
They were a great power in India not in the world. Not to offend anybody but India has been a pretty backward country through its entire existence. The Mughals were a great power because it was by far the most populated country since China descided to collapse again. And the Timurids (partly India) were great because "Tamerlane" was a great military leader like Napoleon or Ghensis Khan.
bengal sulthanate was a part of delhi sulthanate and mughal for a long time , in 1720s i think it got independence from mughal s but soon in 1757 bengal was annexed by british
@@jemoedermeteensnor88 sounds like a typical westerner comment on south asia.
@@kumaraanu it was independent from mid1300s-late1500s and from early 1700s to mid 1700s and it was a vassal state semi independent under them
I think in 12th Century Cholamandalam Empire was the strongest empire. And it was declined at the end of 12th Century AD. Also, isn't Gupta Empire stronger in 3rd to 5th Century AD?
yeah bro this person is terribly underestimating india. we had the more man power and bigger economy for most of the history
Where is the VOC??
16 century poland?
Bulgaria was the strongest country during the 10th century. The Byzantine empire hasn’t won a single battle during the reign of emperor Simeon the great
Hahahahaha
In what universe is Bulgaria ever the world's strongest empire.
@@Holy_VHS_Tape Diring the first half of the 10th century. Yes, it was for a short time but it’s a fact that the Byzantine empire couldn’t defeat Bulgaria even with an army two times bigger. You can watch a video about the battle of Achelous (917)
@@Holy_VHS_TapeIn this, the fact that most "history lovers" only know Bulgaria from WW1 does not mean that it is false.
Poland overslept again
I like The Roman History 🇮🇹
There is very little impartiality in this video, right? (to give some examples according to the creator as a summary).
-Spanish Empire: slaves (it was one of the powers of the time that had the least), killing natives (the vast majority died from diseases to which they were not immune or killed by other natives), stealing gold (the Spanish took much less than is thought, the Romans took more gold from Spain than Spain from Latin America), obtaining wealth (the Iberian Peninsula hardly benefited, most of what was extracted stayed in the colonies).
Conclusion: nothing good from what is implied.
-British Empire: exploration (the Spanish empire should not have had that XD), trade (the Spanish empire also traded a lot, like it opened new trade routes for all of Europe), colonies (it does not say anything bad about the treatment of the British) , a very important role in world history, shaping cultures, economies and political systems (all this is also contributed by other empires, the Spanish one too and it is not said).
Conclusion: everything is good as it is implied.
I say all this not to deny the importance of the British Empire, I am simply struck by the treatment given to some empires compared to others in a completely false way.
The spanish empire abolished native american slavery in 1512 burgos laws, That most died for other Native Americans is false (From the Spanish territories), Not counting diseases, 2 Million (lowest estimate) died as a direct cause of Spain.
Spain discovered much more than the United Kingdom, discovery of America, First circumnavigation in history, Congo River, western coast of the Americas, from Alaska to Tierras de Fuego, Chile, Amazon, Antarctica, maybe Australia, Oceania (first), Hawaii and most Pacific Islands, Philippines, China and Japan, all of Southeast Asia. India and Sri Lanka (Iberian Union), Middle East and the Persian Gulf. Most of the current territory of the USA. Caribbean, Atlantic Ocean, Pacific, (the English did not have access through Spain)
Se la ha chupado demasiado a España en el siglo XVI,cuando Portugal aun después de Elcano tenía el comercio mundial en sus manos y el Imperio Otomano se soleaba a todos en Europa solo tras el tornaviaje en 1565 y Lepanto cambian las cosas.
@@danielguerrero894 el comercio mundial estaba bastante repartido, no solo en manos de Portugal, pero bueno que veo que tus comentarios van en el sentido de negar todo lo relacionado con España.
You forgot about Macedonian empire 😡
I have put the countries AD only😭😭
That was in B.C.
Can you read and hear
@@drexplained0 What about Gupta Empire?
Lol almost f by some locals of brahmin city near multan
Okay. Which country will be the next strongest in the 22nd century?
Ottoman empire
@@popbob4100 It'll be Neo Ottoman Empire which means Turkey rejects NATO membership and starts getting every land.
@@popbob4100 It'll be more like the Neo Ottoman Empire which means Turkey will reject their NATO membership and start getting back their land that was originally theirs.
🙋🏻♂️🇩🇪
kitler was there
This is realistic but the Bulgarian empire in the 9th century defeated the Byzantine so i guess bulgaria should be it.
Us military during 2nd world war where?
What does AC stand for? How's it different from AD (Anno Domini)?
After Christ
The Empire of Japan wasn't even close to being the strongest in that century, all they did was fighting poor and underveloped China, they had some initial success but were getting pushed back when the Chinese managed to actually give their troops decent equipment.
Can't wait to see some kazaks trying to claim golden horde because they was majority of population
I know what BC, BCE, AD, and CE are, but what is AC?
After Christ, It's like AD
@@drexplained0 how does AC relate to AD or CE?
It's supposed to mean Ante Christum, or before Christ in Latin. It's misused in this video.
Sassanid honest reaction:Bruh
Based
WHERE MY BOY BULGARIAN EMPIRE EVEN YOU FORGOTTEN ABOUT ITT 😭😭😭😭
Out of the entire century, they were definitely not the strongest
Perhaps he is a Byzaboo who is still salty for what the Bulgarians had done in 811 and then the early 900s!
All century
1st century=0ad
2nd century=100ad
3rd century=200ad
4th century=300ad
5th century=400ad
6th century=500ad
7th century=600ad
10 likes for part 2
What?
Proud to see the Mughal Empire in the list ❤❤❤
gupta empire (1st to 5th)
vijayanagara empire(14th-15th)
chola empire(10th-13th)
is the strongest during their era
That’s just not true lol
"Why the **** you lying, why you always lying Mnmm omg stop ***** lying!"
The Strongest In Indian subcontinent, not in the world, don't cry about that
Agustus look like trump tbh
You're just hallucinating🤫
dude you forgot about mauryan empire
It was strong in only indian subcontinient
i would have to disagree with you on the British Empire
id say there century was the 19th not the 18th as the Pax Britannica was 1815 to 1914
Yes, in the 18th century things were equal in Europe between the French, the British and the Spanish. From the beginning of the 19th century, Spain fell in level in terms of power compared to the other two.
@@SergioSP-kc8bd I agree id say France was a little more powerful than Britain but the seven years war was the turning point
@@gordonmcintosh8333Remember that later France became the greatest power because of Napoleon, The Spanish empire in 1780-1805 planned a Hispanic "commonwealth" and gave independence in America and adapted, Ferdinand Vll, King of Spain, was the reason that Spain definitely lost any possibility of being a counterweight to the UK.
@@Galletas-my3sv of course under Napoleon the French were the power but that for was 15 years of the 19th century the other 85 Britain was the power and while i understand Napoleon was not beat by Britain alone he did lose
@@SergioSP-kc8bd En el siglo XVIII España fue el escudero de Francia,mucho territorio pero no estaba en primera fila.
The Mughal emperors were basically just timurids 😊
Ottoman was at peak in 1683 and in 1713 it went into decline
i don’t agree. the 1700’s were more of a stagnation period rather than a decline for the ottomans. there’s a difference between those two. there decline happened in the 19th century with the rise of nationalism and increased european influence in the empire.
@@waytooboring- ok
Were Polish - Lithuanian comonwealt
Seljuks,Ottomans based. 🇹🇷
What about the people’s republic of China
Ya I too thought he would include it in 21st century as 2nd strongest country
China is currently the strongest country in the century
Nope, America is
@@DogCow-wh1up nope, economically, militarily, and technology is China
@@CONSTANTINEXI63 No on all fronts? Do actual research and check the stats, on all accounts the USA is higher than china.
@@DogCow-wh1up The United States is trying to hold on as the leading power at the expense of Europe. When Europe falls, let's see who it relies on.
@@CONSTANTINEXI63 What are you talking about? The US has a higher GDP DESPITE having a lower population than China, and the US military has massive spending, and combat experience. While China has more military personnel, they are less funded and have lower quality equipment and no actual military experience. Additionally, the US has a larger nuclear arsenal and is much better equipped for military combat.
Well.....Rome was a kingdom and then a Republic for a few centuries before not only that time didn't actually fall until the fifth crusade wrecked the city causing the ottomens to conquer their last great city like thousand years after Western half of their empire fell so the Romans were damn near 2,000 years of existence but what do I know...🤷
Temurids empire 14 century
very eurocentric view. throught most of history before colonization, most of western european kingdoms were pretty much irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. the only notable europeans at that time were the Romans and their later variant, the Byzantium, maybe even france, as these are the only nations outsiders took care to notice. but throughout most of them the islamic, indian, steppe, and chinese kingdoms were the dominating powers. europe only started to catch up when they got access to new world resources and market.
I'll even go so far as to say that europe at that time were on the same level of global relevance as the southeast asian states.
нет
It only took 2 years for the Aztecs to be conquered by Spaniards, and it took 40 years for the Incas to be conquered. And it took 170 for all Maya kingdoms to be conquered.
17:42 ah yes 21thUSAtury
19th century was UK
3rd Century AC.
Sup
Now I shall recreate the Holy Roman Empire and establish horrible borders
Borders don't matter silly
you need to establish a clusterfuck of a loose federation of city-states
@@Zeroneii3 Even better
I can't wait for the enclaves inside enclaves inside enclaves inside enclaves inside enclaves inside enclaves inside enclaves inside enclaves
@@Averaage_CommenterPerfect
If you have trouble fixxing the borders, maybe you can ask the English for help. They tend to be good at this.
Polish Tortoise ahh
5:15 the abbassid and seljuks were allies and actually seljuks were an abbassid state (the abbasid become weak to rule that big areas) so the maked a states like murabtin in africa and spain, seljuks, the zenkian and ayubi states
The reason is the shias muslim fatimain expanded in italy and egypt and algeria
seljuks did not formed by arabs it was formed by oğus turks in cemtral asia which arabs never ruled
@@hicbisey2805 yup but the caliphate is the united states of islamic states which is seljuks one of them so they never attacks abbasid because they were the on of the states
Texas can't attack usa so
When USA realize that you're not the strongest country compared to past:
Ya no country is
0:19 Donald trump
Yey ottoman
FRANCE IS CRAGGED
Speak About All Political Movements such as Black lives matter
Or The Arab Spring
i like how the guy is neutral and doesnt disrespect any empire/dynasty etc
Doing so during part of the Spanish empire shows that Native Americans were slaves, When slavery was abolished in 1512 burgos laws
I cant see india
Italians and Turks: oh yes thats ours
Oh also that
Yaeh we are in all time
Oh... We dont need to tlak again(:
I maen saljuk nad ottomans and mongols all are turks
The Mongols aren't Turks lol
@@_CZcams-User_ they have thé same dna of turks
@@user-qe6iu9wu1l no they aren't, Mongolians are East Asian and Turks are West Eurasian
@_CZcams-User_ nope we both lived together but they have different dna
@@Turco-Napolitano Yes, they are different people even though Turkic people lived near/along them for centuries
100th liked
111th comment pin pls
Black Gengis han wtf
bro afsharid empire deafet mughal and ottemans how wasn,t in list?
Were is al mohades Empire 🇲🇦😡
Next video
very biased video... You greatly underestimate the greatness of the Islamic empires.
Who cares lol
Islamic empires where strong but weren’t the strongest
@@Vy367u bro dont be mad because they were actually hygenic and had good medicne and you should care because they basically created the moder world of medicine
@@Vy367u And you do care because you watched the video and the person who made the video also cares so yeah
@@YaxCore I ain't mad lol