"He Should Have Died In Prison!" O.J. Simpson Lawyers Debate
Vložit
- čas přidán 4. 06. 2024
- Piers Morgan Uncensored holds a debate on notorious American football player and actor O.J. Simpson following his death, with lawyer Alan Dershowitz, who was part of Simpson's defence team, lawyer Gloria Allred, who represented the family of O.J's murdered ex wife Nicole Simpson Brown, academic and author Marc Lamont Hill and author Jeffrey Toobin.
Do they think O.J. killed his ex wife? Was his trial an issue of race? Would he have been acquitted if the trial was held today? Piers Morgan asks all the above and more.
00:00 - O.J. Simpson trial
01:20 - Did O.J. do it?
04:10 - Is there any doubt he committed the crimes?
05:20 - O.J. Simpson death coverage
06:50 - Gloria Allred: ‘I think it is clear he did it’
08:40 - What role did race play in his acquittal?
12:00 - Mark Fuhrman 'planting evidence' accusations
13:50 - "The system has failed women and victims of violence"
15:00 - Was the evidence tampered with?
16:36 - Were the police involved in tampering?
24:39 - "So you're against the constitution?"
26:03 - What would have happened if the trial happened today?
31:00 - Summing up O.J. Simpson in one sentence
Subscribe to stay up-to-date on all Uncensored content.
Follow Piers Morgan Uncensored on:
Twitter: / piersuncensored
Instagram: / piersmorganuncensored
Facebook: / piersmorganuncensored
TikTok: / piersmorganuncensored
Follow Piers Morgan on:
Twitter: / piersmorgan
Instagram: / piersmorgan
#piersmorgan #debate #ojsimpson #crime - Zábava
“Not Guilty” and “Innocent” don’t always mean the same thing.
Explain
@@lewishurley7690you can be found NOT guilty but have committed the crime in question. You can be found guilty but not done the crime in question
Would you settle for a Not Guilty verdict?
@@thatbemefool yes. As stated the standard is BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT
@@NyakzOTSD- Exactly and there is no such verdict as “Innocent.”
I’ve never seen Piers sit quiet for so long 😂
It's almost certainly the new haircut. 😅
I’m surprised he didn’t ask them to
Condem Hamas
Piers is quiet by choice. He knows when to sit back and allow a fascinating debate to unfold. I'm surprised Piers didn't start munching on popcorn. LOL. 😂
Do you condem khamas
He’s been doing this for years. Comments getting old
Dershowitz said it best; When told he could be honest.
His reply? "No I can't. I'm a lawyer.'
You have no idea on what a lawyer is supposed to do. You defend the client. Hillary Clinton vigorously defended rapists of little girls.
I was coming to the comments to say this.
@@justinmiklich230 I suppose to his credit, if you are hiring a lawyer to defend you, you want a guy that will defend you regardless of your guilt or innocence.
And that completely sums up Dershowitz and Defence lawyers
@@suzannek3493 that’s why the term that I use for describing lawyers is “Hired Liars”
Once that detective pleaded the 5th in a murder trial, it was over.
Facts especially when he was asked did he plant evidence and he plead the fifth the whole case was gone
Facts once he did that the case was done
i have what i thought was a strange take on this but in recent days i'm finding out i'm not the only one. i think he did it. but i still would have aquitted for this and a few other reasons. that trial was a dumpster fire.
@@DamitFeelsGoodtobeaRaiderWP refuse to accept that the prosecution bungled the case. They wanted the jury to convict on feelings. There was a juror who said that if the prosecution did their job properly, she would've voted guilty.
He pleaded the 5th because Johnny would have made him look like a complete fool.
OJ simpson died peacefully, the opposite of how his wife/wife's friend died.
Blame the prosecutors for planting evidence. That’s what acquitted OJ.
Not guilty 🤷♂️
That’s good. The cheating ho got off easy. He shouldn’t have shot the man. Only her.
@@I_Negan_IBlame the racist jury 😏
@@Colt-ii4qn they just explained how he got off and has nothing to do with race.
There’s a reason why innocent people go to jail due to tempering of evidence.
Nobody said OJ was innocent of murder. Everyone basically said he was guilty of murder but acquitted due to tempering of evidence.
Wow! What's up with Piers? 12 mins in and he allowed all 4 guests to speak at length without him interrupting.
😂
He hasn't even asked if they condemn Hamas 😂
I know and it was so much more interesting for it.
Probably because he didnt have much background knowledge about the trial and the American legal system is substantially different from the UK's.
I was wondering that same thing!!
Death is no revenge. We will all die.
By that logic it shouldnt be a crime in the first place
Death is in FACT, revenge. Death is the price for sin. Humans were not originally created to die.
@@richbrake9910 garbage
@@richbrake9910 that's ludicrous. I've never killed anyone and I'm still going to go the way of OJ someday.
Right 👍
Ron Goldman was just dropping off Nicole’s mother’s glasses. What a shame.
Are you so gullible to believe that?
@@mox9076You obviously know nothing about this subject.
Yea and an ounce of coke 😂
RON WAS NOT JUST DROPPING OFF NO SUN GLASSES AT NIGHT HER YOUNG BOY FRIEND WAS NOT DROPPING OFF SUN GLASSES AT HER HOUSE????❤ KIN.FOLKS GET REAL
Wrong place wrong time.
shocking how people respect the justice system only when it favours the outcome they expect
That's the tendency.
Facts. If he would went to jail on bogus evidence. Whites would be happy.
The evidence didn't show Mr. Simpson murdered those two people. Further, common science conveys that there is no way he could have brutally killed one person while the other pary awaited their turn.
Mark Furman exercised his Fifth Amendment right when cross examined about planting evidence in this case.
If a police officer applied for a pension because he hates Black people so much he can't bear to continue to work. He is also likely to have planted evidence in a murder case.
In other words, Dershowitz thinks he's guilty.
Yeah, but the evidence is not strong enough
Of course, but that’s not the point here. It’s about the legal case.
@NyakzOTSD the evidence was overwhelming. For the police to plant all of this evidence they would have to get blood from him while he's sleeping and take it to the crime scene and then swap blood from the crime scene and rub it all over his car and clothes. The jury knew he was guilty his lawyers new he was guilty. It was just "anti racism" racism and getting revenge against white people as a whole for Rodney king
@@NyakzOTSDit was strong enough, the jurors admitted to knowing he was guilty and they let him go.
@@NyakzOTSDPeople like you are the reason why your community can’t have jury duty!
Dear Marc Lamont Hill: They did not plant that glove. Tell us how Fuhrman acquired the exact mate to a pair of gloves purchased by Nicole Simpson in 1990??? Get real.
Dershowitz is not being fair regarding the EDTA issue. OJ's lawyers called Roger Martz , an FBI agent, to testify as to the presence of EDTA on the sock. Martz testified that the amount of EDTA on the sock was so low that it could not have come from OJ's preserved blood. OJ' s lawyers were then forced to call a very unimpressive witness to testify that there was a sufficient amount of EDTA to conclude that it was planted.
Fuhrman f this case of, because he wâs and still is a racist thug
Good point. But if my memory serves correctly. The planted glove was allegedly picked up at the crime scene and then planted at OJ's home.
@@rhondabitler5474 More than 13 officers were already at Bundy before Fuhrman ever arrived. They all put in their notes that only one glove was observed at Bundy. The DA never bothered to put them all on the stand to counter the "he planted it" BS from people like Dick-o-witz.
@@scarecrow1958 I knew it wasn't planted. I just mentioned the stupid theory they conjured up. The DA dropped the ball on that one.
This man was found not guilty but responsible civilly. Gtfoh, only in Amerikkka
Toobin didn't whip it out. That's progress.
He's a progressive.....
🤣🤣🤣
but he was thinking it...
fap fap fap 🤣
You missed it, I saw the mushroom head at the bottom of his screen! Also he was jerking around, no pun intended
This is what real "privilege" looks like, famous, rich.....not color
Poor black men in the south huh
Absolutely!
I can tell you were not around or cognitive about the Racism that was displayed and used, manipulation of evidence with racially motivated Jury Nullification.
It was both oj was white until he killed to people then whipped out the race card
...this is what it looks like when a rich black man can afford justice...any joe blow would''ve been lock on ...on some bogus say so.
Nicole was not important to the majority of the jury.
No OJ didn’t do it though imo they both just got themselves caught up with gangsters and drug money hearing from people close to them recently in interviews. Basically it sounds like she was killed for owing drug money OJ knew what happened and was told if he said anything his family would be killed. In the end I think karma worked it out probably about right OJ spending rest of his life under that cloud and not in prison.
This
I agree
She was a drunk junkie that owed lots of people money a lot of people wanted her dead if she didn't pay up
Correct!!
Alan Dershowitz is being disingenuous with these socks. There was no blood on the socks that was poured. There was blood splatter plus smears where someone with bloody hands removed the socks from their own feet.
Additionally, edta is a preservative in most foods and is in almost everyone’s blood system from eating processed foods.
💯
EDTA in food will not show up in dna results, esp if you not looking for it; and esp in high volumes. I think OJ prob was at the scene amd he may have done it, but the LAPD showed up and did things with evidence that they shouldn’t have.
Yes but not at those levels that were in the blood sample taken.
lol...how blood got on the socks is pure conjectures. The crux is that you can't pick up those levels of EDTA in someone's blood - the required concentration to trigger a positive result is thousands of times that found in organic blood. It's comical to suggest it got there any other way than from a EDTA blood tube.
Abnormal levels of EDTA was found in OJ's blood at specific, not all, locations at the crime scene.
The blood pattern on a single sock had transferred from side "A" of that sock to the side "B" of that same sock.....that blood pattern could not have duplicated from one side to the other side if that sock had been on someone's foot.
Why do you need to plant evidence on a guilty person?
Because you don't trust the jury system,
No one planted evidence.
DNA was brand new to the scene, and people didn't even know what it was. Until then, only blood typing could be done.
But even if you completely disregarded the sock evidence, you still had their mixed blood in the Bronco, at the crime scene, on the gloves found on two different properties, OJs DNA on the cap at the crime scene, and so much more.
Even a juror, a little old black woman, went on TV and specifically said she didn't care what the evidence was, that the police got away with beating Rodney King, and this time they were getting back at the police for getting away with it. This trial had everything to do with race.
I wish someone asked Dershowitz why they went in OJs house and removed all the white people pictures throughout it, and replaced them with famous copies of black paintings and photos before the jury visited there. I want him to explain hiw ethical it was for them to rearrange OJs home to remove the "whiteness" from it, and insert all kinds of "black" items....
Dershowitz was just as much of a schemer and an unethical POS during that time to get OJ off. He knows OJ killed those people, but he doesn't have the conscience to care.
Even Robert Kardashian had enough of a conscience to look surprised and bewildered when the jury acquitted OJ.
@aquariusf6412 no evidence was planted and the lapd let oj beat his wife
he was a murderer and now he is dead
Racist Police Bottom line/ If there's. doubt about planted evidence in such a case//any case the jury must acquit. like he said the porscution lost this case. Any lawyer could have beat the case on the evidence that was used then the doubt about planting evidence is just too much too over come. If there's just a question about doubt for any reason then by law the jury needs to find not guilty. Especailly doubt about evidence. If they didn't use the gloves and there was no doubt about evidence I believe he would have been found guilty..
"The LAPD was so incompetent they could not frame a guilty person" All his lawyers and the Jurors have said of course he's guilty but because of Slavery 🤔 And the Riots a year or 2 before. Let me add that the cops that beat Rodney King should have gone to jail. King was in total submission and had it not been recorded, most would doubt it but King did not deserve that. Tragically the Left riots whenever things don't go their way.
Norm said it best when he said, " This just in. Murder is now legal in California "
RIP Norm, we miss you!
Classic Norm. Those OJ spiels from Norm will never get old.
Lol!
True but that was defamation and OJ should sued him and SNL for broadcasting that into oblivion. He was found not guilty by a jury of his peers and no mater how much we don’t like it … that’s that.
It always has been if you are rich just ask the US GOVT
The burden of proof was on the prosecution, and they bungled it.
@mattdawg83686 There was overwhelming evidence that was presented. The jury didn’t want to convict him based on race . Pathetic.
Very educational video. Once OJ passed away it spurred me to revisit the entire story and I was astounded to learn there were mountains of evidence that was not permitted to be shown at the criminal trial. I was astounded to read about how regularly Nicole was beaten, and the patterns of behaviour from OJ. How he chased after very young women and did not hesitate to have extramarital affairs over and over. I was astounded to see the extent to which the police and the prosecution bungled the case. I was astounded to discover Oj was a hopeless sociopath. Those two people died very violent deaths . And sometimes life is not fair. I understand why the jurors elected to acquit but the interests of the victims and their families were not served and that is where the justice system can fall short, similar to when we read of instances where completely innocent people are incarcerated for many, many years . One can only hope that society learns from all of this. I know in Canada we have made great strides in mental health, violence against women, protecting the innocent, rooting out bad law enforcement, etc. But there's much more to be done. It's always going to be work in progress unfortunately.
You make good points and I agree. However, I think they would have acquitted had they saw video. This came down to race and a police department who was considered racist and corrupt.
Mind blowing how many people don’t know the difference between not guilty and innocent and when you try to explain it to them they don’t want to hear it
And get annoyed when you point it out to them lol
I want to hear it. Explain it please. I really want to know.
@@dannialkateb2575 - For a "not guilty" verdict, all you need is "reasonable doubt". A doubt which you can justify with a reason. That existed in this case--just with the planted evidence. That was enough to acquit. The verdict here was the correct one. Jurors could have believed in their hearts that OJ did it--but they were obligated under the law to acquit in this case. There is no place for emotion in trials.
What’s even more mind blowing is how that’s even a form of law. I guess when civil law is factored in the decision it balances everything out. But it still should not be an acceptable part of law because if one is not guilty of murder then how can they be responsible for someone’s death and the case has been proven as such🤔
@@dangrille5846 A criminal trial requires “beyond a reasonable doubt”
A civil trial has a lower standard of “more likely than not”
In my mind he 100% did it but the prosecution was horrible and the defense was able to give reasonable doubt . For that reason not guilty was the correct verdict even though I think he did it
Why were two LAPD detectives in possession of the defendant’s blood for approximately three hours? Why did the detectives hand over the defendant’s blood to the criminologist at one of the crime scenes instead of logging it into evidence?
*Eastside Low Bottoms sh*t !*
Simple answer:
*Because they were planting evidence !*
why was Nicole and Rons blood all over OJ's bronco ?? LOL
@@dltguitar6532, that little bit of blood for such a bloody crime scene? Does that raise a suspicion for you? I merely pointed out some of the reasonable doubt that lead to OJ being acquitted. If OJ did the murders, he must have had an accomplice. No one found the knife or knives that were used or the shoes or the clothes. How did he get rid of them. How did he kill two people by himself with a knife and did not get any marks on him?
Notice he said murdered her “friend” not “lover”
Because there is no proof they were lovers Einstein
He drove her Ferrari a couple times. Sounds like more than a friend. Also that's why the manager at Mezzaluna asked Ron to deliver the mom's glasses
@@dannystephens9155 the friends of Ron said multiple people in their circle drove her car .. regardless -what does it matter ? None of them deserved what they got
Excellent debate. Well done Piers. Seems like you really enjoyed the conversation sat back and listened graciously. Respect
I don’t think Piers, had the full understanding of the case so he couldn’t give his monarchy passion to support Toobin and Gloria!
@@samrich2269 At least he didn't pretend he did!
Wow, even OJs own lawyer basically beat around the bush to say, he did it.
He has to in order to comfortably walk around in white society…
LOL…he’s trying to get his “White Privilege” card back!
@joebloe4491 I don't think that's going to happen any time soon considering his defense of J. Epstein, and his public opinion on age of consent laws. Lol.
He knows
@@jenkinsljenkinssquire9137 of course. Dude said he can’t tell the truth. That was enough, but all the hints he dropped sheesh.
One of the JURORS said this was payback for Rodney king
yup. from that documentary a few years back. she also said they were tired and just wanted to return to their homes. unbelievable.
If O.G's wife was black you think America would have been interested to this case??😮
No they dont care about black people.
Police should not be involved in taking blood evidence. It should be obtained by medical technicians.
Well they shouldn't plant it either.😂
@@Marcus-kc9wcOJ's blood was all over the scene, his vehicle and even at his home. You people are really sad.
@@skip031890 It's hilarious how people can't accept that OJ killed 2 people. It's like a mental disorder.
This right here!!
@@skip031890 Exactly. Says a lot about people that defend a murderer.
Bottom line is if you have money , you can buy your way out, system is more like a organization.
Justice shouldn’t have a price tag
Berni madoff couldn't do it nor could havebizabeth Holmes Fred bankmen or Jordan Belford they probsbily have bigger networth then.OJ.SIMPSON LOOK.WHERE THEY ENDED UP.
But it does 😢
The majority of the jury were black...the black defense attorney pandered to them big time and blacks are known to go light on black defendants when victims are white...happens all the time
Skakel still got convicted of murder, and he was related to the Kennedys!
Hey Alan, did the cops plant the Bruno Magli shoeprints at the crime scene???
Why not. If they put blood on oj sock they can also find the shoes you talk about
What you don't know about the shoes is that they use the sole of those shoe are on a lot of shoes ,if you don't believe that go research it so stop with the shoes plus ask everyone involved in this case why were there two phone records of Nicole's not only that The prosecution.
Put a motion in To seAL them from the trai plus 75 years.Her last call and conversation was at 11pm 11:15 to her mom 😮😮
@@bekreto 😂😂😂
@@bekreto 😂😂😂. And to those of you who see impossible conspiracies, one day you will meet God. Ask him who murdered Nicole and Ron. OJ did.
"Better 10 guilty go free than 1 innocent wrongly held". I wonder if Alan would apply that to Hamas terrorists going free?
That is how debates should go. Everyone was respectful,you never noticed the moderator, and they all made good ,well thought out points.Just good all around.
I don’t think so! Dershowitz is hysterical!
@@1Thedairyhe made good piints
When you had jurors that came out and said we thought he was guilty, but we let him go for Rodney King says all you need to know
@chrisbarras3908 Even if they said that, which is not the actual reason he was acquitted, that is called Karma. So stop crying 😭. Rodney king didn't deserve what he got. And I haven't heard you crying about it. We see the same things today through social media happening and you guys do nothing but cheer the perpetrators..
@@bridge1933This is why nobody believes there is white on black racism. You show the true racism.
Bingo
@@bridge1933karma! 😂😂😂
How is it Karma? What does police brutality hace to do with a white womens murder? Just shows how tribal and racist you are
Must agree, brilliant debate. Learned a few things also on what was really going on. Thanks for sharing. 👍
Jeffrey Tobin is pathetic in this debate. He doesn’t look prepared.
Dersh and Marc Lamont Hill smiling and agreeing with each other in any setting was not on my bingo card.
Right?! Hahah
Sorry why is that . I don’t know Marc Lamont but he is gorgeous .
@@avrilallison8224 Dershowitz is very pro Israel and Marc Lamont Hill is very pro Palestinian.
Agreeing with Dershowitz wasn't on my Bingo card either.
Considering Marc Lamont Hill called for ethnic cleansing of Jews, I’m surprised as well.
People should look up the 911 call Nicole did long before he finally committed the final act. This is the end result of DV. Everyone knew he was beeting her. It sickens every fiber of my being that this world upholds race over stopping the egregious act that is MV - AW.
So you wouldn't be upset if your wife was having drugs in the house and pimping herself out while the kids are in bed?
Good. You people always want it your way. Go back and look at what happened to African Americans while you’re going back in history. GTFOH
I remember this murder and trial like it was yesterday. The 911 call is chilling. You can hear him freaking out in the background.
Fact#1: OJ and Nicole were divorced over two years before she died. AND he was dating someone else during that time.
Fact#2: The DNA analysis presented in the evidence, found that the blood found was NOT conclusively OJ's . A fact so called "intelligent" people overlooked.
Fact#3: The OJ Trial SHOWS the PERMANENT divide between Black and White people. The Black jurors were called "stupid" and "low IQ" for coming to the verdict they did. The ARROGANCE of White people was FULLY displayed after the trial, all the way to the Civil Trial and the Vegas casse.
Gtfoh how bout releasing Nicole’s phones records the phone call she made to her mother leaving Dana point which proves she was alive while OJ was at the Airport.
Didn’t know that about the blood on the socks…interesting!
If the police didn't take shortcuts and plant evidence this woman and man would have gotten the justice they deserved. Peoples anger is in the wrong place.
🎯
😂 wow
First, that is an assumption and second, that is pretty cold hearted. Even if you assume evidence was planted, a person murdered, brutally I might add, two other people
@@jenkinsljenkinssquire9137 it is because of people like you innocent people are thrown in jail. And the fact that you aren’t outraged that evidence was planted is because it happens to certain people more. Shame.
I could have defended OJ and got him off. Jurors have now openly admitted that OJ was found not guilty purely as revenge for the acquittal of the officers who beat Rodney King. They were going to find him not guilty day one of the trial.
I never seen Piers Morgan so quiet. He's usually constantly interrupting people.
Cuz, he has limited knowledge of how the jury in America works, and tampering :&+*%$ EDTA ??
"DO YOU CONDEMN OJ?"
People with brains were talking logic, and he was being educated.
Piers was out of his league with this panel....Piers hangs out with tabloid journalists, mostly !
He killed them, but they failed to convince a foolish jury of murder.
There is no evidence that connects O.J as the killer
@@zulu2053hahahahahahahahaha
@@zulu2053 The Bronco run says it all.
Majority black jury, so no surprise!
They didn't want the entire county to burn down.😅
What’s with all these OJ jurors coming out saying they knew he was guilty but didn’t want to convict a black man. How sad and sick!
Probably would have been an excuse to riot. So chickened out.
A few have come out and said that they regret it. One was Lionel Cryer, the one who did the fist salute. Another was Carrie Bess, the one who gaslighted Nicole for the abuse but then said that she regretted saying not guilty mainly because OJ made fools of them all when he got into trouble in Las Vegas.
10 black women- any questions.
I'ver only seen one say that. How many others?
@@michaelallen1396Is that really true? If so, those are some regarded BW. They should ask themselves what group unalives BW the most? Not the Nicole Browns of the world, yet still defending the unaliving of WW at the hands of BM.
Police did screw this case up from the jump. They covered the bodies with sheets from Nicole’s house which totally contaminated the entire crime scene. The sad thing is that during this case it’s the police who were on trial because they were corrupt when OJ Simpson should have been the one on trial. He died days ago, now he’s going to have to answer for what he’s done.
That is, for: what he did or didn't do. His maker will judge him. Get your head around it.
Such BS. There was plenty of evidence to convict OJ. Blood in his bronco. His shoe print in blood . His cut hand. Blood on back gate. It all was about pulling the race card.
What did he do?
You are right. It is hard to believe that these veteran detectives didn't even do the basics regarding the crime scene. That alone would have eliminated some of the complaints from the defense. It is sad. Neither Ron or Nicole received real justice.
OJ would have been drenched in blood from head to toe if he did it. Keystone cops used test tube blood to try and guilt him.
The jury didn’t nullify??? Of course a majority of the jury nullified! Several jurors are on the record saying as much!!!!
I think Alan Dershowitz is absolutely right when he says "we didn't win the case, the prosecution lost it." As a retiree I was able to watch most of that trial on TV and I was completely blown away at just how bad the prosecution was in this case.
I just remembered for the first time in a long time how silly and extremely white co-prosecutor Marcia Clark went from straight hair to an extremely curly perm halfway through the trial. Trying to seem to be more blackish or something, to the black jurors. It didn't help. It probably hurt, actually. But it was (seemingly) impossibly silly.
@@user-bf2cv9xo7xYou're wrong. She had curly hair to start and got a much more attractive,in my view, style during the trial.
Exactly
@@user-bf2cv9xo7x You have it backwards - she started out with a perm and straightened it.
The two biggest factors in why the case was lost were 1) Moving the trial from Brentwood to downtown L.A.; and 2) Jury selection. Everyone seems to have totally forgotten that many of the original jurors were dismissed at the defense's request, and some of those jurors said they had been leaning toward conviction. I think the final jury that decided the case had only like 3-4 of the original seated jury and the rest were alternates.
you know ....there was no reason to plant guilt.. he was guilty...
Yet they did it anyway 🙃
Absolutely no proof that anything was planted.
Where was you during the trial??? WHERE WAS THE EVIDENCE…at that time, I have to admit, at first, I thought for sure he was guilty, and the letter he wrote someone read, sounded like a confession and suicide note...then comes the trial…I saw with my own eyes….
Mountain of evidence was an insult to my intelligence….Lying witnesses, planted evidence, lead cop recordings show he's a liar and a huge racist, glove doesn't fit, time line doesn't add up, bloody shoe prints not the size of OJ shoe...witnesses on plane who saw no cut finger on the way to Chicago...
Furman wanted to be sure, the brother fried like he had done to many of us before.
….I saw the trial. I admit, at first, I thought for sure he was guilty, and the letter he wrote someone read, sounded like a confession and suicide note...then comes the trial…I saw with my own eyes…
I was laid up with a broken leg and I saw most of the trial. Most people were working during the day, and they only saw pieces on the news or Fox News. if I wasn't laid up with a broken leg I probably would've thought he was guilty as sin. ...planted evidence, lying witnesses, crooked cops, no fibers, tainted blood, they had nothing.
My book! My book!
Marc Lamont Hill spoke the truth and I'm glad his insight closed the interview. Great discussion!
*OMG 🤪🙄 The guy did it.. stop whinging about the ifs or buts.. the bloke doesn't deserve the waste of time!*
So glad he’s gone now.. May we all rest in peace from his name!
@Caareenkm6726 Seriously they all sounded like bickering old women over a guy that don't deserve the debate. It's ancient history!
“Bickering” over this topic is important so that we can all learn from it so that we don’t repeat it.
How u know . We're u there
@@Caareenkm6726legend
gotta love lawyers arguing completely unhinged like normal guys without all of the pomp and procedure of a courtroom decorum
Epstein's little buddy makes me sick.
Can anyone shut Dershowitz s' mouth, ever. He had good points, but we are not stupid. We heard you, however, the other Author had a point that was good, also. Personally speaking, how would you feel if this exact scenario played out in your family and the killer walked free? This is from someone who thought O.J. was great!!
@@dannyjones4044Dershowitz said just what he wanted and needed to say. And it was pertinent to the topic. I'm quite sure he doesn't care about what you think. Toobin is the one I think should shut up. OJ was dead to rights. Most of us thought he did it. But to obfuscate the phony moves made by the LAPD and the prosecution team is just silly.
@@dannyjones4044 Epstein's little buddy has no good points. He's GROSS.
@@dannyjones4044blame the police for being racist
. However, the defense neglected to mention to Rieders that one of those blood drops had been photographed being there prior to the reference vial existing, proving it couldn't have come from there.[134] Furthermore, Detective Vannatter, who was accused of planting the other blood drop on the sock never went inside the evidence van where the socks were stored which proves he didn't plant that blood either.[38] FBI special agent Roger Martz later demonstrated that the results were actually false positives from having tested the reference vials first before the evidence samples
The POS didnt suffer he was playing golf in vegas and his NFL pension he lived the good life
Wow! What a debate. And it is over 30 years that this debate was triggered, and here we still are.
Now, the picture of what MLK said becomes so clear, "I think I've led my people into a burning house." It's super KKKrazy that folks completely forget @MarkFuhrman! That's unfortunate.
Glen Rogers
The killer confessed to the murder & everyone still wants OJ to be the killer.
Because race is a part of the fabric of this nation
What voluminous evidence that OJ was guilty of murder of Nicole S and Ron G.
EVERYONE knew that L.A. would have exploded if Simpson was found guilty. The Judge, Jury and public realized this.
Shouldn’t be a reason to let a killer go free. Or put an innocent man in prison like they did to Derek Chauvin.
Oh well..all the unjust murders..lynchings..hangings..church bombings..racism..etc..the justice system has failed lack people for centuries period..
That’s bullshit most people in LA actually believed OJ was innocent based on all the fake ass evidence how do you take the blood samples home for days people wtf and Ron Goldman had defense marks all over his hands OJ didn’t have One mark one his body that was a Mafia Hit
Yup, now way they would give him a just/fair trial after what BLM looters and rioters were doing during the summer of love.
Explode? You have no idea what you're talking about ....the black community didn't care that much about OJ....they cared about a black person getting justice...and there were mostly AAs on the jury...so it would be stupid to think ...ppl would fight about OJ.....make some black friends...and you might know this...they don't bite.
I wonder how Dershowitz really feels about Toobin’s book. Can someone fill me in?
Probably untrustworthy he left out some true facts about the planted blood on the socks.
Clearly a bs book if you left All the shit police did not
Great debate folks.
What happened is the prosecution was very arrogant. They thought they were just going to walk through and get an easy verdict. There were multiple things happening that they weren't prepared for.
We need to see Toobin’s Hands, you see Gloria is trying to see what he’s doing😮
😅😅😅😅 Is this his "debut" appearance since he had that hand job?
😂😂😂
😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂
For the first time a lawyer being honest lmao can't tell the truth because I'm a lawyer 🤣
The only reason why the gloves didn’t fit is because they were soaked in blood and had shrunk because they were leather.
Also, he was wearing rubber gloves which made it even harder to put the leather gloves on.
And he was wearing latex gloves under them Total crock of shit!
False. He also tried on a brand new pair of the same size and they also didn't fit. I would love to see Glen Rogers try them on before they execute him in Florida.
@xavierb9061
Actually, it really will shrink the gloves. Also, he had a pair of white (rubber?) gloves on, which would make it more difficult for him to put the leather one on.
@frossbog
When did that happen? I watched the whole trial and I never saw him trying on a new pair of gloves in the courtroom.
Dude! OJ himself wrote a book called “If I did it” it he was literally bragging in the book and on live TV with yellow smirk on his face about how did he got away with murder.
The racist section of American society wanted O.J. to be killed or rott in prison because he was a talented Blackman.
Yes he basically confessed in that book! Millions knew he did it anyway!
The front of the book says if I did it and I did it where in red
His tv interview with Judith Regan made me want to puke. He slips from a hypothetical account of "if I did it" into a vivid blow by blow of what happened from his own lived experience. How he felt, what they said, all of it. He was smug as hell and thought he was untouchable.
Only the stupid people and the race grifters claim OJ was innocent.
Too Much Dip On Their Chip 😂😂😂
Good for you Alan Dershowitz this country need more lawyers like you
Robert Blake got off and no one complained? That lady on CNN is not qualified to speak for anyone but herself.
Lots of unsolved cold cases (murders) exist in this country and no one is complaining about that either. So what is your point?
This was the trial of the century dingus
@@tombreckinridge6218 - only for you suspected WS.
Blake was not as obviously guilty though, and was not a racial trial. Simpson's trial was racial in every way possible, which is why it received more attention and complaints. The lady is Gloria Allred and contributed well here. You need to realize Gloria has never practiced criminal law. Civil Rights lawyer.
@@richbrake9910 - Blake got a full jury of his peers and as per the norm, they let him go although he was clearly guilty as F. Your boy Mark the liar Furhman got OJ off and he was welcomed with open arms to faux news and Kluxer heaven Idaho.
In the lead up to Nicole’s death, OJ was already being abusive to her. He was guilty.
u wasn’t there goofy
Totally agree. Who the hell else had any reason to kill her ?!
@@Fixed-bait66. Obviously you are young. It was well publicized in American media that OJ was an abusive husband
She harrased his 1st wife and his kids she got her PAYBACK drug dealers got her Ron just happened to be there
He was guilty. But planting of evidence acquitted him.
Nobody is disputing he killed her.
I appreciate the way Piers just let them go at it. He didn't feel the need to add his own voice to the conversation.
The prosecutor showed incompetence
He got away with murder
it's God who is going to judge him he was aquitted so please let him rest in peace
"reasonable doubt"
If you can't prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. Let him out.
Against nfl defense, yes
He's not resting in hell.@@rosecroco2787
I was in a pub in Yorkshire shortly after the OJ trial ended. Someone in the pub asked me if OJ was only charged with Nicole’s murder because he was black. I told him that OJ was only ACQUITTED because he was black. That was the end of that conversation.
Explain Robert blake 😂
@@seancompton5393Money …Celebrity … Stupidity
That is ironic, because it is proven that legal justice outcomes, greatly favor white people
No Acquitted because of dirty cops planting evidence.
That should have been the beginning of the conversation 😂
The damn glove didn’t fit because he quit taking his medication days prior knowing his his hands would swell
Facts
A very civilized conversation between respectable and reputable gentlemen , decency!!
🤔Doesn't leather shrink when it gets wet? Anybody ever sweat? 🤔I bet anyone would sweat like hell if they just killed two people that was fighting for their lives.
I've always asked that. dumb ass jurors.
OJ didn't want Nicole to date anyone but him. He was obsessed with her. He loved her, but didn't treat her like a human being, but just a slave to him. Furthermore, he had anger issues and didn't get help. Even after he killed her, he wanted to date women who looked like her. But instead, he became a total loser in the end. He destroyed his legacy as a human being.
Wow sounds like you knew him well…NOT!!!!!!!!!
You think the NFL gonna remove his bust out of the hall of Fame
Racist narrative, went to criminal court found innocent. You sound like the cop
When did you meet either one ? Or are you saying what you heard or was told .
@@user-hj7wv8cl7j People do research and use their inductive/deductive reasoning skills to figure out what was O.J.'s malfunction. The guy was abusive to Nicole according to sources.
lets all talk at the exact same time so nobody can hear anything lol
thanks for the interesting debate!
Alan Dershowitz: “Sure I Got a Massage at Jeffrey Epstein’s Mansion, but I Kept My Underwear On.”
Crazy
And Jeffrey Toobin watched and waxed his carrot 🥕
@@darizob😂🤣😂
Lmao...BUT who ever would have thought...Im with AD with this! OJ had a JURY and he was found INNOCENT and END OF STORY! And I find the Goldmans greedy. No money will bring back the son...
Why does he still contribute on these shows?
“You didn’t want to present evidence that undercuts your thesis of guilt”- Alan 😂😂😂
You wanna hear something crazy? The moment I went to the comments and read this, he was saying this. Crazy timing lol
Alan is a clown!
@@TheAnduwan18Happens to me every once in a while with a video while I’m heading to the comments lol
Alan Dershowitz like only defends guilty rich men who abuse women and girls and get away with it. OJ, Epstein, Claus von Bulow, etc
He is vile
The justice system is the only example of an institution I can think of where the Truth does not always prevail. What an injustice....
Fortunately, OJ losing many American’s respect was a life sentence for him.
1:34 Piers told the man that he can be honest and he responded "No I can't" then went on to basically say that OJ was not guilty. He literally just told us that he's not being honest when he says OJ was not guilty.
😂😂😂 caught that too. Even while laughing as he says it. Cuz he knows it’s BS!! Can’t even say it w a straight face.
He was basically saying that he isn't stating his opinion. Hee wasn't admitting to lying.
I also noticed that “contradiction”.
It was a waste of tax payers money . Karma got him later on when he did time for 9 years. Granted it was only 9
"using white vehicles to escape black realities"
😂😂 That's hilarious and deep in so many ways. One of the best sentences I've ever heard 👏👏
And it describes every black person. Why is that?
Police planted evidence and the jury acquitted OJ because they were pissed at cops and white people.
@@readmore4178 How does it describe me? I have a white vehicle but a black wife. The only way I escape white people is to work from home. Thank God that is my option.
@@readmore4178All black people have white cars?
White America is guilty of slavery and the oppression of humanity they all are responsible for te codition of evidence you see emotionally.
Where did the cops get OJ's blood to pour on the socks? From the crime scene where he sliced his finger? Where?
Good question. Maybe they found where he donated blood recently
@@user-op2tx9rk7n Sure!
@user-op2tx9rk7n Ojay gave a blood sample to the police when they first brought him in for questioning before he was deemed a suspect. Another piece of truth left out of the media take on this case if he did it and knew he did it and bked at the scene why would you give them a blood sample, IJS
He voluntarily gave them the blood when he came in for questioning. Do your research.
Wasn't oj blood. Wouldn't it of been the victim's blood?
Love how Nicole brown gets a “may she rest in peace” but not Ron Goldman!
It should be mandatory that Toobin has his hands on display at all times.
Hands up Toobin, don't shoot.
😂😂
LMAO😂
How does he even show his face?!
Like your mouth
"He should have died in prison."
Best line in the whole video. Very true and straight to the point.
Ron was a big young man, pics showed he fought for his life…he was not swinging at wind……pictures of Ron with bloody defensive marks on both his hands, legs and feet....they stripped OJ to the bones, the next day,…no abrasions… the only thing he had was a cut finger….Ron was beating the heck out of someone else and not OJ.
That comment is razzzz ist
@@gdiwolverinemale4th🤔
Again, blame the justice system for this one ….
You are being emotional,we are talking about law and justice
This has been the most productive and well articulated conversation I've ever heard on this topic. Each person made a valuable contribution, even when their views diverged.
Their shouldnt be any planted evidence it makes the whole thing hard to believe
No one should be given a pass be it Black or White when it comes to murder!!😢...... it's just clear America is divided by race but they should do better!! From Cameroon 🇨🇲 Africa 🌍 with love ❤
Really tragic that afro-americans celebrated the acquittal, imagine what the two families & friends of the victims felt seeing that on TV
@@FreezeMathiasthey felt how black felt when y’all killed trayvon
@@TonyBono-mo7dgOh please! He was a thug!
RIP Juice your legacy is still intact to those that matter.😎🙌🏾
@@LadieKadieand they were crackheads
If you have the money and you’re on trial for your life, why WOULDN’T you hire Alan Dershowitz?????
I'd not hire him because he gets your back up, even now with his rudeness and not letting others speak or interrupting them as they speak. Learn some manners, Alan, AND get a vocal volume control.
People often forget that the jury had no knowledge of Fuhrman pleading the fifth. So to say that his doing so provided the jury reasonable doubt is incorrect. As for the gloves not fitting, the brand new pair he tried on later in the trial did fit and a representative from the company measured his hands and said glove size is XL (same as the ones from the crime scene). Further, the jury was shown many photos of him wearing that exact make/model of glove. The jury acquitted because they wanted to go home and wanted to get even for Rodney King. They used Fuhrman to excuse themselves for such an unconscionable decision.
Can you imagine a massive guy like OJ, a professional athlete, could hit a defenseless woman in the face?
If a guy could do that to a woman he "loves", he's capable of just about anything.
💯
He didn't do it
Imagine how the millions of slaves felt at the hand of master
It was so overwhelmingly obvious that he killed them and I truly believe the one attorney was correct - they had enough on him to find him guilty regardless of the stupid mistakes the prosecution made, as well as the reprehensible actions of the police. You could tell by the look on his face that even OJ couldn't believe they found him not guilty. It is so heartbreaking for the Brown and Goldman family. I can't even imagine how horrible it must have been to see that (I'm sorry) vile man walking free, playing golf after he had nearly severed her head off with a knife. I have always thought that even he thought, deep down, that he deserved to go to prison and it wouldn't surprise me at all if that is why he got himself in trouble with the memorabilia - to soothe his guilty conscience. When he got out of the bronco after initially fleeting, they found a gun, a goatee, a mustache, adhesive for the disguise items, beauty store receipts, and his passport. And Cowling had $9,000 in his pocket.
I hope I don't meet you in my Travels, you probably shake in your boots every time you see darkies like me.
Not really
no...........he didn't😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀
@@TahranStrong-mc4qtGet well soon, delusional moron.
You call taking blood home a stupid mistake?
"You didn't write it in your book because it doesn't suit your narrative."
😂😂😂
Dude couldn't dispute that one! Hilarious! 😂
I can't believe you had Toobin on this show. What a shame. Dershowitz is still lying. What a losing panel.
I think you can read around his words, he's not saying oj was innocent, he just said he wasn't found guilty. He was to choose his words wisely or he could be disbarred....to my understanding. I wonder if that confidential attorney-client superseded the grave of oj.
Not guilty meant it was not proven. Not the same as innocent.
When i hear Alan Dershowitz speak all i can hear is the final monologue from the movie Seven "This is a man who dedicated his life to making money by lying with every breath that he could muster to keeping murderers and rapists on the streets!"
He defended trump after the insurrection so that tells you all about dersewitz moral compass
" what's in the box? ".
Alan never lied.. brilliant lawyer and because of him America is a better place...Alan is a patriot
@@legion1630 you are a true human. The goofs are so many though. We're not worried.
His legacy is dirty
socks
No, it's not, he made the Bronco a classic car. And his yards are legendary. And he died in his bed at 76. The American dream.
@@marquellmartin1287His true self came out. He was a lying actor all his life. In the end a killer that would deny till his death . He had an easy death surrounded by his relatives lying in bed 🛌 😑
@@bennymutantso? Many other pieces of evidence pointed at him anyway. Even his friends say he did it!
Like Michael Jackson's. No matter the talent he - MJ, had as a singer and song writer, his legacy is dirty.
Mark was on point! That is what got O.J. off! Plain & Simple!
Marc Hill, when asked by Candace Owens, “Can a man have a baby?”, replied “Sometimes!”.
IMHO, I’m not sure how reliable his opinions are...
3:27 That’s a lot of word dancing around the fact that his own lawyer knew he was guilty.
They all say they believe he was guilty, and he probably would have been in prison if that racist police officer did not temper with the evidence.
Yup
In the American legal system, OJ was entitled to a fair trial in front of a jury of his peers with legal representation. His lawyers may have known he was guilty, but they also knew where it failed with law enforcement tampering. Prosecutors cannot convict people on false evidence. They should have only presented real evidence.
@@az5195* tamper
@@az5195
Temper with evidence? How many knew that same detective on number of occasions tried to date Nicole during her separation and after her divorce. Lol