Man City & Chelsea PREMIER LEAGUE EXPLUSION❌FFP CRISIS!
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 03. 2024
- Follow The Squad Here 📲 - qrco.de/beptYS
The Football Terrace is Part of GiveMeSport - www.givemesport.com/the-footb...
Ways to follow & support TFT:
👊Support The Football Terrace by becoming a member - / @thefootballterrace
✅The Football Terrace Notifications GC - t.me/joinchat/PFK9J0Idbjg5YWY0
🎙️- Podcasts here - podfollow.com/the-football-te...
🎮Twitch - / thefootballterrace
📳DISCORD Group: / discord and Support
📺Football Terrace Clips - / @footballterraceclips
💃TIKTOK - / thefootballterrace
🐤Twitter - / tfterrace
📷Insta - terryflewer...
📲Facebook - / footballterrace
The Orignal Multi Fan Podcast & Fan Channel's Weekly Podcast taking a detailed look at the Premier League's Top 6 Clubs. We delve into the latest news, match reactions & transfer rumours. We are famed for leaving no stone unturned and our motto is no echo chambers. All Reaction videos and views are opinions and not statements of facts #PremierLeague #TheTop6 football terrace,the football terrace,man united,manchester united transfer news,STOCK MARKETS,REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT,INVESTMENT,FINANCE,PERSONAL FINANCE,MONEY,LIFESTYLE,AMAZON FBA,ONLINE BUSINESS,DEBT MANAGEMENT,GOOGLE,APPLE,stock market,Chelsea PREMIER LEAGUE EXPLUSION,chelsea premier league explusion,premier league,chelsea,chelsea fc,chelsea profit,chelsea ffp explained,man city 115,manchester city 115,man city ffp breach - Sport
![[실시간] 전철에서 찍힌 기생생물 감염 장면 | 기생수: 더 그레이](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4nkFvwxGAfA/mqdefault.jpg)
Follow The Squad Here 📲 - qrco.de/beptYS
I just don’t get how hard it is to understand when it comes to the 115.
1.It is a financial doping issue, not ffp issue.
2.They have plead not guilty to all charges.
3.The type of rule break they have done is not public knowledge. It is suspicion that the governing bodies need to find themselves.
4. It is 115 potential rule breaks, not one.
Let’s not put that side by side the Everton one for instance….
1. Everton broke one rule over the course of 3 years. Not 115 over the course of a decade.
2. Everton admitted to this and GAVE THE EVIDENCE THEMSELVES!
3.The rule they broke is accessible to the governing bodies, and anyone in the world as it is in the public domain.
What don’t people get?
If I’m arrested for 115 crimes that I plead not guilty to and higher the best lawyers and share 0 evidence, who’s going to go to trial and be convicted first?
Me or the guy with 1 crime who’s admitted to the crime which is on cctv and he gave them the cctv 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Just wait. Chelsea and City are gonna be fucked by the end of this year guys.
The longer it takes, the more they will find.
I'd say it took 4 years for the EPL to charge them and then panicked because of the threat of the new regulator. Looks to me like if the evidence isn't conclusive then the EPL really have a major problem.
If the premier league had irrefutable evidence of the alleged breaches they accuse Man City of, this case would've been over ages ago.. Man City will prove their innocence when the premier league insist on taking them to court. That's how the law works.
Except City already been found guilty once.
I don’t understand how anyone is defending city. 115 accusations mean you 100% did something wrong.
Charge them for 4 allegations this season. 32 point drop. 24 charges next season and so on. Don't let City do what they've already done against uefa.
don will still blame this whole financial situation on caicedo playing the lone 6
100%
u know it's international break when media talk about FFP AND Man city's 115 charges😂
You know one team has been punished if the media and people on youtube discuss what other clubs should be looked at soon.
Chelsea have to sell before the end of June right? They'll have to sell dirt cheap otherwise the other clubs will just hang tight. As an Arsenal fan, I hope we don't give them a penny. We already helped them with Havertz.
I'm absolutely on the same page as you. As a Spurs fan, I'm getting very angry with all the so-called clickbaits linking us with Gallagher. I wouldn't want to give them a single penny. They deserve absolutely everything they'll get. Basket case of a club and I curse them.
I think it has to be home grown players
They should take enzo lol
What a dream it would be to see City booted from the PL.
Chelsea might get relegated the traditional way anyway. 😏
😂😂
It'd be great for the league if they both get booted down to League 2.
Then we'll see just how many plastic glory hunters stick around and continue to "support" them. 😏
Dream on . The epl will not be able to prove these allegations . That is taking them this long. You guy are naive and jokers. They are not billionaires by accident . Poor people sit and worry about these billionaires.
I wouldn’t be surprised next season Pep Guardiola resigns
He wants to join Utd in the post-glazer era.
He wont even need to move home.
And why not? Its a club that fits his pedigree and salary demands. Would cement his status as the GOAT, and would stick it to the club that lied to him (City).
@samwize28 If only you got those middle east owners everything would be complete. Right.... Fergie really left you all directionless
Pep the snake knew all along.. did he think money grew on trees😂
@@rakimrobinsonMCFC directionless? We are 20 times champions, are about to have a world class stadium paid for by your tax money, Pep as manager and have no charges of cheating.
Take.
@samwize28 The 20 times champions. have never challenged for a league title since he left over a decade ago, are no longer a consistent CL qualifying team. You weren't a European force with him don't even think of that now. It's well documented that Trafford is in a VERY deplorable condition. With that much success, you should be ashamed to beg for help. Richest club in the league, highest spending club. You're fall from such great heights to not even being able to consistently make top 4 while spending billions outspending all the league since he left is the greatest fall of a Club in EPL history. You all just using number to push other stories, Time will tell. United will never return to those heights.
This video actually shows the stupidity of FFP and PSR… unless all teams are playing by the same numbers not a team by team number based on the popularity of the club and money coming into the club there is no fairness whatsoever. And by number I am not saying percent of expenditures but rather a hard spending amount akin to a salary cap. Get rid of this idiocy.
Salary caps might be illegal under restraint of trade legislation. Beyond that, if you set it low enough to fit the small clubs, it would instantly make the English game uncompetitive internationally and would see all the best players and managers leave and destroy the EPL as the most financially successful league in the world, taking the entire pyramid down with it. I understand why you want this, but it's simply not workable. It's also not clear to me why clubs like Liverpool, ManU or Arsenal, who have earned their own money through success, and the likes of Spurs, who have managed to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps into the top echelon, ought to be punished and hamstrung. Surely it's clubs like Man City and Chelsea who have financially doped their way to *success that ought to have something done about them.
The only idiocy here is your comment mate. For all the reasons the guy above me explained.
@@TheLeeBonnerIt's not silly to want a level playing field, or at least a more level playing field. I can understand the feeling behind it, despite supporting a huge club. It's just that a salary cap in a single league is not a workable solution, at all.
It would also create perverse incentives that I don't think people foresee and would enjoy - in the US, they are there to enable owners to make huge amounts of money as players can't bargain for it and none of it gets passed down to fans in terms of reasonably priced tickets, fairly priced shirts or reduced expenditure on TV/streaming packages. This would make football *more* commercial, not less, and would turn even small clubs into hypercapitalist "franchises".
I think I'd be willing to give up quality and primacy in European football for the 50+1 model, but not for a flat salary cap.
@@TheLeeBonner as stated...akin to a salary cap...not an actual one...the problem I have is that there is this FFP/PSR stuff at all....the way they hae it implemented is terrible when a billion dollar club can spend almost whatever they want as it only caps their spending to a percent not a hard number. I would say just get rid of FFP/PSR and let the owners spend all they want.
What would the salary cap be? I'm not opposed to it, but then the small clubs will say you can't put the cap too high. Big clubs will say you can't put it too low. IMO, the salary cap works if all the teams are only concerned about making money, with no real investment, similar to how north american sport works. Very few of us fans want that owner controlled-only-for-profit system
Those player purchases you reference (£611m) are not shown as a single, one-off but are annualised / amortised; so 15-20% (£96-£122m, at most) of that are on the books for the year shown, then each of the subsequent years going forward.
If FIFA, UEFA The FA & Premier league weren't Corrupt themselves these clubs would have been punished ages ago!
Meanwhile these clubs have been allowed to go on winning trophies after trophies 🏆 🙄 🤔
I like when Terry says “a hundred and ten percent” as if 100% isn’t good enough. 😅
Should be 115
Nice break down Terry. I would just like to add a perspective though in regards to how you look at the spending.
Now just wanted to say, I do not support the ownership at all and think their spending has been as reckless as I've ever seen done in a long time of watching football.
I also think Borson is not going after Chelsea because he hates them or because he's a City guy or whatever the counter arguments to his interviews. I think he's been quite clear, he's going on the information that he's aware of.
The only thing I wanted to add to the way you've presented it is in regards to a few points. 1 is the total annual spend for example. Does this include the projected cost of a transfer or the actual cost? What I mean is, Mudryk take for example. It was reported he was nearly a 100 mil Euros but that was with all potential addons being met, leaving the actual transfer cost significantly lower. So is the figures taking in the total potential spend or the actual spend?
Same for wages. Clearlake have had bonuses involved in a number of their salaries. For example, James was on I believe 250 k/week however, due to stipulations in the contract, it is reduced to amounts we aren't aware of at this time. One such stipulation is for European play. Most if not all of the contracts now have these sorts of bonuses, "incentives" included so again, how accurate is the wages? I would presume it's mostly a general estimate, which is fine, providing there's that understanding it isn't exact.
Another key point is the amortization factor, as we all know these transfers have been amortized over long periods of time, therefore if Chelsea spent total 500 million in one window, it's actually not that simple. There's the installments that have been negotiated with said organization plus the reduction. Lukaku take as an example, 97.7 million I believe, so round up to 100, then divide by 5 leaving the club owing 20 per season. Now this is a rough explanation, as wages are included in the total amoritzation but it gives a general idea that they wouldn't be looking to balance books based off the full transfer cost of the player all at once.
I just wanted to point some of this out as we know there are far longer contracts than 5 years at Chelsea, some being 8 years. So the club would only need to meet year to year obligations based on these factors, not on the absurd lump sum obligations for totality of transfer and player contract.
That said, it puts the team on thin ice, season after season and it already looks like they're desperate to stay afloat given the need to continue selling academy players to balance books.
It's quite messy situation and a self inflicted predicament the ownership has forced on themselves and all of their supporters.
The whole point of FFP was not about increased competition. It was to stop reckless owners coming in, and asset stripping clubs. There’s a massive ideological gulf among football fans, based on classic philosophical economic and social questions: is the purpose of clubs to win trophies and chase dreams and there be no restrictions; or is a football club firstly and foremostly a community asset, and the entrenchment of existing elites is a small price to pay to uphold this principle? Moreover sport, is not like any other industry: where with sport, if you wipe out the competition, the industry dies. These are two incompatible positions. Football fans need to recognise trade offs, and that there is no ‘cake and eat it’ solution out there. .
Boehly is a genius they said 🤣🤣🤣
How can Chelsea fans talk when they spent a billion on transfers and wages last year but they're sitting in mid-table 😔
So you want the fans to be depressed and mute let us be man the fking club is going though alot.
Because we understand that this is a project and money spent doesnt mean immediate success, especially with a complete squad overhaul.
@@joshmoore0914 spending money does also not mean success ... money needs to be spend wisely
Irony: Terry mentions Man City inflating their income to avoid PSR & FFP, immediately interrupted by an advert about Asahi lager in partnership with Man City. 😂
No way Man Cheaty will get off. They will be relegated to tier 5 & banned from inward transfers for 5 years
& thier titles will be given to Liverpool Man U & Chelsea. EUFA have ordered EPL to smash Man City or english clubs will be banned from EUFA run cups.
I support WBA.
I'm a University Professor & thus neutral. I love Foden's talent.
People who say that FFP is to protect the top 6 clubs clearly aren't old enough to remember how many clubs were going bust and into administration or god forbid liquidation in the 00s because of gross mismanagement before FFP (or PSR) was brought in
exactly ... a free for all always ends in disaster ... what is needed is a salary cap so all clubs are on a equal footing
so suppose City + Chelsea gets relegated: so 5 up from the Championship then? alternatively 2 up and no relegation from the EPL?
Well said sir.......at last someone to explain the difference between the charges.
Like I said many times before, City will get away with it while other teams will get fined and get punished!
It's fixed in their favor that's f sure; can't believe that not1 charge hasn't stuck yet, not1?
If this was say Bolton or Wigan, I reckon that atleast 1 charge outta the 115 charges would of stuck by now
@@janysmahoney1271Do you understand what a pending charge is? What do you want them to do? Kick City out the league now? And then City found not guilty and then sue the FÃ? 😂
@janysmahoney1271 Because the case hasn't been heard yet. Time will tell
What about the amortissements on contract with thoses number u listed
I’ve followed Chelsea since the 60s. I’ve endured decades of seeing Man U spending far more than Chelsea, or anyone else, ever could. Funnily enough, it was never seen as a problem back then.
Fuck Chelsea
How much revenue did Man U generate ? they were known around the world when other clubs were invisible
@@cxv6367 they were twice saved from bankruptcy by generous benefactors. Their wider popularity was established after Munich which coincided with regular televised football a few years later.
I said it a year ago. Saying it again. Chelsea is the new Everton. Their fans don't realize it yet. They are finished.
Really well explained.
Terry again, SPELLCHECK, SPELLCHECK, SPELLCHECK
expulsion
Not enough fans understand the ffp / PSr rules and just assume it’s all a media storm. The EPL need to resolve the City farce asap and, as you say the Chelsea situation (which we were all shouting about last summer) hasn’t come to the decision point yet, that’ll be next year. It’s going to be as interesting as the actual football to see how it all pans out.
this all needs to be solve within the active season ... not 10 years later
For those Chelsea fans who say "nah relegation will never happen" Go speak to Rangers, Juventus, Lazio and Fiorentina fans and say that to them. AC Milan were lucky to escape relegation but had a 15 point deduction for cheating.
Leicester sold those players about 10 years ago and just got relegated.
Stop talking bs Terry 😂😂😂
Well said Tel, facts
The issue is how fast "smaller" clubs like Everton and Forest are getting punished compared to the big boys like Chelsea and City.
In the world where money talks, most of us just have a feeling the fines will come with a caveat that benefits the victims.
Its why i highly doubt city will have any point deduction actively during this season cus the optics will be terrible for the epl
Let's be fair
Everton's and Forest's breaches happen by the end of season 22/23, so it's almost a season before they're being punished.
Chelsea HAS NOT YET breach PSR, they need to raise £100 million by 30th of June, if they can't then they breach PSR for season 23/24
The financial irregularities for Chelsea is a different case and they're being investigated
The financial irregularities for Man City is also a different case, as it is not a spending problem like Everton or Forest, it's basically fraud and it's harder to prove, and they already scheduled the trials for this fall.
@@goonerOZZ yes and City are claiming not guilty, the others put their hands up and agreed they were over so were punished, Everton hid a bit but Forrest were more upfront and got less
Fair points....I appreciate the clarifications. I guess in situations like these, those nuances are harder to put into consideration...depending on which club u support
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the losses to be combined over the latest 3-year/season period? So if Chelsea breach this year, but were profitable in the 2 years previous, those profits would cancel out some of this year's loss, which could put Chelsea inside PSR boundaries. Chelsea can then improve their finances (somehow) to stay inside the lines, so to speak.
Now the self-reported cheating with transfers during the Abramovic era is a different matter and should certainly result in the book being thrown at them, mitigated somewhat by self-reporting. Personally, I would take away the trophies earned across the seasons when those players' contracts were active (because Chelsea wouldn't have had them without the under-the-table payments), but no points deduction or relegation, so that the punishment is confined to the previous era. I would also require the club to open up the books to forensic accountants to discover if there are even worse violations not yet discovered or being covered up -- because I suspect (based on nothing but a belief in the nature of successful finance folks that know how to exploit loopholes) that Chelsea is confessing to a lesser violation in order to hide something bigger.
I almost guarantee that most clubs in the league have paid agents etc under the table. I wouldn't call it cheating. That's how big business works.
Some agents have a lot of power and influence in the footballing world. Let's not be naive.
@@danwaters4139 If you’re correct, then Chelsea are naive for turning themselves in. Every team may be doing it, but it still violates EPL/UEFA rules on player transfers.
How many of there players they bought over the last 2 windows due to age are based on them being development players, In which I beleive get struck off as academy and youth players. They spent 100 mil on 16 - 20 year old who are on loan.
That City graph you showed means nothing to the charges.
Your graph started at 2019. City’s charges ended in 2018.
You'd think they'd learned from the previous transfer embargo that saw them lose 2 top players because they couldn't renew their contracts. Did they hope they'd just get another embargo so filled the sqaud with +6 year contracted players to soften an expected ruling?
That seems to be the case.
They were also banking on being in the cl. Which is not a good idea.
@@lilbaz8073 If I was a Chelsea fan or even the new owners I'd be asking the UK government if they hid the skeletons under the floorboards when selling the club for 2.5b. Or did Tom do a Musk and lodge an offer before doing due diligence? Imo, if the slate was clean when Tom bought the club he probably could of got away with it by the skin of his teeth spending the amount he did in a short time. I'm not sticking up for them or offering excuses but on a base level, something doesn't sit right with me with the initial purchase based on my 30 year career in property sales including commercial probate/ repossessed sales.
@@Ben_Gunner they did their due dilligence. Put £100m aside to pay off fines. Spent a load buying players incase they got a transfer embargo.Then informed the prem and uefa.
Uefa only gave them a £10m fine as they have a time bar. The prem don't and seemingly give points deductions.
wage cap and revise agent fees
Hi Terry I hope you've got the proper coloured cross of st George on the back of your shirt
Nice to hear you have absolutely no problems in your life mate.
Terry when are you going to talk about Trent to Madrid
Indeed ffp rules are to protect the big six interest....
Fans view complex multimillion pound business finance akin to consumer banking. And CZcamsrs throw around jargon like they’re experts because they once had experience in consumer finance. Fans should stick to what they know best, gloating in their team’s success and sulking in their demise. And also regurgitating others opinions as if it’s their own.
and how do you know what the business finance knowledge fans have is ?
Discussing finances and stats whilst saying 110% 😅
It depends upon the context.
😅😅😅 dude quick maths you invest $10 shares and your investment goes up 150% how much is your share now worth
Well done to the ppl @ Liverpool.Made Chelsea pay silly money for players knowing they will be put outer severe strain when it comes to buying/selling players …
Of course PL is easier to charged everton, forest, and Leicester instead of city. They're facing against a football club, not an entire state
petrol dollars
Chelsea didn't do anything wrong last season so it's only speculation for this season and it's mainly coming from Man City employees who are trying to deflect from their 115 charges.
Chelsea needs £100 million worth of academy players sales and £30 million Lewis Hall is a done deal and Maatsen for £35 is also very close so where's the panic coming from?
Man City will take long time because there are 115 charges but they seem guilty AF!
There has been no new information on FFP. It won't even be brought up officially again for months and won't reach anywhere significant for YEARS. This idea that it's an imminent issue is false. You all keep bringing City up. None of there cases are what City are dealing with.
Don't forget the comment made by that borsen melon where he said we know this "yeur" they're about 40m in profit
@@CJ4YRD That Borson muppet when he spoke Chelsea he was firing from the hip whereas when the City issue came up he went into sissy mode crying about wait and wait let the club defend itself and don't throw stones just yet.
Can't take that muppet seriously but at least he was honest about the £40mil.
@@Xebthebarbarian him saying we can't make a profit on Lukaka or Kepa was all I needed to hear from the idiots mouth 🤣🤣
@@CJ4YRD It's a clear campaign to try to lower the prices on Chelsea players and to deflect the attention on those 115 horrendous charges.
The glaziers were regular visitors of epstein island no mention of that on your channel unless you support it ?
Hell yeah Epstein island it up ⛳
Chelsea will be exempt from any FFP case. Unlike other clubs,Chelsea FC is now a new creature by the reason of transferring of ownership which met the sanctioning of sales conditions and contract of takeover as agreed by EFL management and Clearlake consortium. Any recourse to such aftermath and attempt to bring in past actions as regards monies is null and void unless the EPL are also liable to it in same manner with Chelsea FC.
The legal terms of being free from encumbrances has already been taken care of during the signings and documentation exchange prior to take over ! Therefore, Chelsea fans relax 😎
Most of us are but you have the spoiled entitled section of it that crying and it does get tiring for Everytime there an international break it's always kick Chelsea out or dock then points but the new owners have been forthcoming with everything unlike the city group
And yet, Chelsea will not be exempt from PSR, which was allegedly breached by the beast in all its new, metamorphosed glory. All transactions made post-takeover will be encumbered by those dastardly PSR rules. So that null and void recourse you mentioned may apply to Willian and Eto'o, but not to the 45,852 players bought by Todd B ✌
Wrong. Chelsea the entity are the thing to be punished and that is irrelevant of ownership; selling the company doesn't free the company from liability in football or in business.
But I expect no less from a moron who doesn't even know the name of the league ffs - it's the Premier Leagues (PL), NOT the epl.
Stick to baseball.
@@Nicola0329No because the amortisation made it that PSR won’t dent Chelsea and at worst Chelsea have avalanche of players to sell and bridge the profit gap moreover that £90+ loss isn’t up to three years yet.
That is my opinion as regards the PSR
The Man city one is PL against the state so there's politics involved hence its prolonged.Man city is sponsored by the Oil state.
Terry is in for a real shock when Chelsea don’t get regulated
TFT TOP 6 YOU MEAN
FFP need to be punished and changed its punishment for top clubs for doing nothing wrong thers something illegal going on with the FFP
The only organic team in the Premier League is Liverpool 😮
They got a transfer ban just a few years ago, plus there are many other well run clubs like Brighton, Aston Villa etc
LFC got a transfer ban for the youth team. Trying to sign a young player 11yr old and a 100 k fine in 2017. Not the first team like chelsea. Which is wrong but paid the price. CFC and Man Shitty plus others have done senior breaches. Big difference. Again talk facts not headlines. @@reisssato902
Put that Utd shirt on
FFP was created to protect Liverpool United and arsenal saying otherwise is dishonest
Yet, they wanna talk about Arteta spending 700m, at least he spent it wisely and didn't cheat, no charges over here 😎 #TopOfTheLeague
Nobody rates the bum arteta bro
Arteta spent 700million rebuilding an FA cup winning squad and has won nothing since... spent wisely you say?
@@GTA6NEWS35 Haha, yeah you right, only people with a brain rate Arteta, the rest don't 🙃
@@GTA6NEWS35weak comment, that’s something you say when you got nothing to say.
@@Markyy____ The Arsenal squad are currently the most valuable squad in the league, we don't buy stars, we make them, thats been the motto since Wenger
This guy is pure entertainment...he jus waffle on without concrete evidence and perpetuate biasness amongst the rival fanbases
Where are the charges for Chelsea? Scaremongering as usual
they are on the way
Mate you can't even expulsion. Chelsea haven't even been charged.
That Leicester fan must be on some good shit to come up with the comment big 6 are protected how citeh and chelshit both looking at punishment.
Everton's situation vs City's situation is like manslaughter vs terrorism
Still don’t understand how Man U can carry debt and it’s still not looked at by the league
Because it’s owners debt incurred to buy the club, not football trading debt.
Why is football as an entertainment sport being dragged into the business of money??.psr and FFP are detractors. Let sportsmen and those interested in developing sports talent concentrate on sports excellence to achieve the intended goal of entertainment
Expel man city, Chelsea, Everton asnd Forest from the champions league and make them unable to get promoted back for the next 20 years, I think that would be fitting, at least in man city's case
Watching this guy pretend to be a financial expert is making my day 🤣🤣🤣🤣
nit gonna happen or if it does...Super League founded immediately.
How can you forcibly sanction a club, prevent it from receiving revenue for months, insist on a change of ownership, and punish the club for the losses?
Because none of those things have anything to do with the breaches that happened pre Todd or the massive stupid spending they've done since he arrived
@@V4n1lla_Rice breaches before Todd is a separate issue. UEFA imposed a small fine for same. Stupid spending is a subjective term. No other club was denied the right or opportunity to receive revenue.
@stu-eb8vq the things cfc are 'helping' them with now are pre Todd stuff aren't they? That's why they came forward and allowed the Premier league to look thru their books - or at least so thought 🤔
Also , stupid spending is not subjective imo, we all know that if you spend hundreds of millions in one season, you're very likely to be close to breaching ffp 🤷♂️ also, the wage bill etc is defo crazy. At one point cfc had so many players they couldn't all fit in the changing rooms and they still went out and bought more players on huge wages. The biggest problem is those big players are under performing massively. It was a gamble and it didn't pay off
@@V4n1lla_Rice but if Chelsea’s spending is wasteful they will pay a price ultimately. Why should they, or anyone else, be punished twice? Terry poses FFP/PSR as ‘protecting’ clubs. Who do Chelsea need protection from? It’s nonsense. It’s a rule that favours the clubs who make the most commercial revenue. Like Man U. But if you are going to apply a rule, even a bad rule, you can’t have one club being seriously disrupted in the middle of the trading period, but having to be subject to the same rule. That was my point.
The transfer deals that preceded Todd were reported. UEFA imposed a modest fine. If the PL impose something draconian then that’s a political decision. These administrative interventions are opening up a can of worms and frankly it’s just not football. It’s another kind of game altogether.
@stu-eb8vq fair enough, I take your points, you obviously know more about Chelsea than i do... but the rules do need to be there. When clubs go bust they leave behind thousands of jobless people who all have families, mortgages etc. Spending hundreds of millions on players and wages, with a low income is not sustainable, and Chelsea agreed to the rules too
Why do we say “The traditional” big 6?
Spurs finished lower than Everton for 15 plus years on average 😂
City have been a big club for 10-15 years aswel. Chelsea only 5 years ontop of that.
Newcastle and Everton are massive. Villa too.
I accept Chelsea and City as they got the money and used it correctly…. But how did spurs get themselves in there? Because they finished in the top 4 for 6 years in a row? Like wtf does that even mean 😂😂😂😂
Can’t watch the video???.The powers that be coming for terry 😂
Will Villa be able to build on their progress this season? Not a chance, the Greedy 6 won't allow it. Look at Newcastle.
Easy the big teams dont admit liability.They hire best barristers😂
Chelsea won’t need kicking out they’re on the way to doing it themselves 😂😂😂
Imagine all these overpriced starlet players Chelsea have tied down to 8 year contracts... playing in the Nationals and unable to leave... their market value has already plummeted. 😂
Ive got £2 on Chelsea being relegated. 50 - 1. Punish them now.
Dump the super 6, then let’s see if the European League picks them up.
The Maths? Loooool.
Terry, Everyone including that Financial expert has forgotten to mention the 1.5b investment from Clearlake.
And you're an expert on finance now?
@@Lesterthemolester32 loooool. Talking about maths, Clearlake invested 1.5b.
That's the point and that financial expert never took that into consideration.
Actually £1.75bn investment. Purchase Price £4.25bn less £2.5bn to Roman = £1.75bn in my arithmetic? That is where the spending on players came from ie from Investment capital and not trading income..big difference so PSR rules don't affect Chelsea, but who here can understand that, except @charliecosta3971 ! Certainly not Terry!
Terry, you don’t know what you are talking about businesses go bankrupt all the time and nobody stop them from investing.
Terry, you are so sensational it’s not even funny. You will cry when all this come to an end.
'You will cry' is pretty sensational wouldn't you say.
This is what happens when you create rules based on theory and fear of something that never actually happened. Do you have a top flight example, the championship is different the league. It's the same fear mongering tactics they used to get them to vote for this. How does it help teams looking to grow, the ones trying to challenge the big 6 ... you didn't explain that
Leicester need to grow their fanbase to that of United, liverpool and Arsenal before they try to win anything or spend. Why are these Clubs that voted for this complaining and why are they pointing at Man City. Isn't City one of the two clubs that voted against it?
If i was a CZcamsr, i would be as an expert as Terry.
Man united shold be charged too 💯
Why not they are winning. City are more money than Man U . They are winning and will continue to win. FFP and psr will gone now that the small clubs see the game.
Of course Man City's revenue can continue to grow!
They will just get some more 'sponsors' from the same place as the rest!
😜
As they deserve to…
As a non-UK person who enjoys watching English football - (agree with people who say EPL is the best league in the world) - there is one thing that will destroy the game in England and
that is FFP - the old Red teams will dominate the EPL but they will no longer be the beat in Europe and will not be able to attract the best players
**PL*
If you can't get the name of the league right you don't get an opinion.
Go find a 'non-UK' league to follow.
@@kunimitsune177dont be a dick
@@kunimitsune177 It is the English Premier League though. You have a Russian, Afghan, Cambodia, Kuwait, Lebanese and more use the name Premier League for their first division. Also EPL is the official acronym used by UEFA to designate PL teams.
Pep been terrorising you mans mans for a ling time now. 😂 Keep praying for your 115 it aint saving you 😂
This why Chelsea cant sack poch and utd cant sack ten hag
City and Chelsea down to the Championship we will be there 🙏🙏🙏🙏
It's only 115 Charges and pay pgmol
What does PGMOL have to do with FFP? they're a refereeing organisation
Oh you mean the arab state is paying pgmol to fix the var for city?
@@jaycullen9714 If City have been paying the VAR to fix games, then they've been doing a piss poor fucking job of it
Can’t people stop crying victim???? LEICESTER AGREED TO THESE RULES AS A PL CLUB!!
Terry pumping out the anti City propaganda 😂 City going nowhere will continue to dominate football for the rest of rivals life's Wahaha Wahaha Wahaha Wahaha Wahaha Wahaha
Kick them out of the Prem and all that will happen will be they will join / form the proposed European Super League.
Arsene Wenger was always mindful and always said it. Why wait until Autumn to start the investigation or try the City case
Isn’t he the person that cried about players playing too much then wanted a World Cup every 2 years?
@ryaneveritt8324 ffp and clubs spending habits we are talking not players output. That's for a different forum
@@johannmartin520 You were speaking about Wenger no? He said stupid stuff then he’s saying stupid stuff now
Delusional Chelsea fans think they are buying Osimhen lol. Naaah fam you have to sell of all your homegrown players by the end of June or get relegated
Why dont the Premier League do what is done in Spain by forcing clubs to only register players that fit within their PSR limit.
Terry how dare you try talking sensibly. Tee hee hee
Get them cheaters get them
Wheres big steve and his big brained takes. We need him still to explain how city havent cheated
City will get a slap on the wrists at most
Firstly y'all keep forgetting one major thing compared to our big competitors we have the lowest attendance due to the stadium size which is why the club's increasing the ticket fee we don't have stadiums like city,united, Liverpool, Tottenham anf arsenal this was what roman faced tbh
Man City are protected by someone that's why it's taking so long for them get charged
Who?
@@ryaneveritt8324 The conspiracy theorist are out in full force