Asmongold Reacts to Johnny Depp Trial Verdict Explained by a Lawyer from LegalEagle
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 06. 2022
- Asmongold Reacts to Johnny Depp defamation trial, Johnny Depp and Amber Heard court case live, Johnny Depp trial verdict
Making Sense of the Verdict (Depp v. Heard) by LegalEagle • Making Sense of the Ve...
Help LegalEagle reach 1,000,000,000,000,000 subscribers
/ legaleagle
► Asmongold's Twitch: / asmongold
► Asmongold's Twitter: / asmongold
► Asmongold's 2nd YT Channel: / zackrawrr
► Asmongold's Sub-Reddit: / asmongold
Thank you all for watching! Stay tuned and subscribe to the official Asmongold CZcams Channel to always be kept up to date about the best Asmongold Highlights, Asmongold Reacts and funniest Asmongold moments from World of Warcraft, Elden Ring, Lost Ark, Final Fantasy 14 (FFXIV) and other games played on stream!
Channel Editors: CatDany & Daily Dose of Asmongold
► 🎸 Outro song: CatDany - Get Enough
If you own the copyright of content showed in this video and would like it to be removed or the Ad-Revenue made from it please contact::
► / catdanyru
►
#Asmongold - Hry
LegalEagle: "This is a civil case, no one is guilty here"
Everyone: "The bitch is guilty, lets get that straight OK?"
They are not wrong
if you sh+t on somebody bed youre guilty
She did admit to beating him. That's guilt.
*liable
Dude I can use the English language and realize what guilt means. She's guilty as hell
The real sick thing is that now Elaine is saying it was "so awful" that Amber had to testify in front of cameras about her abuse, and that she fought that... when Amber was literally becoming a domestic violence victim ambassador for the ACLU. She wanted to tell her story as public as possible- just not in front of cameras because she is not that good of an actress.
@@danieln6700 EXACTLY!!!!! ANY MODICUM OF SYMPATHY I HAD FOR HER IS GONE. IT'S SHAMELESS!!!!!!!!
Elaine is doing her job. Her loyalty to the client no matter what will get her tons of high profile clients in the future. She's smart.
@@XarkoCZ I HIGHLY DOUBT IT!!!!!!!! I personally think she has DESTROYED CAREER!!!!!!!!
@@XarkoCZ if shes so smart why did she lose her clients case?
13:00 "...my ex-husband."
Even the phrase is still holding on to JD in the possessive case. JD called her 'Miss Heard' throughout his testimony. AH called him "Johnny" and not only that, the way she said it was always protracted, "John-n-y-y," clingy. Her eyes sought him out throughout the case, and he never reciprocated, even after AH's taunting "He CAN'T look at me." And the final punch, that hit as hard as the verdict, I think, is that JD wasn't even in the same country as AH let alone the same courtroom, when AH showed up for the verdict. JD had already moved on. The symbolism of that has to be wounding to a narcissist with severe abandonment issues. Despite repeating how she wanted to "move on with my life", the Washington Post op-ed was entirely a reference to her marriage, and her post-trial statement is more of the same. She doesn;t want to let go of the man who abandoned her - - she can't let him go precisely BECAUSE he abandoned her.
So her post-trial statement still defines JD in relation to HER as "my ex-husband." You can expect a lot more holding-on statements to come, possibly COURTING another defamation case by flirting with danger in castigating him in any periodical that will take the risk. Elaine's agency in post-trial talk shows are holding on to 'Mr Depp' on AH's behalf, enabling her dependency issues like an alcoholic's spouse or a pimp to a druggie. AH might not be able to act again, but she can still get published, or still get interviewed, perhaps thinking, at this stage, what has she got to lose? I predict AH will conduct what amounts to media stalking of JD by repeatedly defaming him to bait him into another case so that she can at least maintain her adversarial relationship with him. If that's all she can have left of him, she'll take it.
JD won;t want to go through all that again, so aside from cease-and-desist orders from his lawyers, which AH will ignore, JD will not take the bait as she continues to call him out. The difference now is, her credibility is shot, and her allegations don;t have the power to damage his career any further.
agreed
Word. I don't think she likes or loves or misses him. I kinda think she hates men. But he's the one who humiliated her by leaving her in her mind. She just wants to get close to strike. She's creepy.
They don't match; Johnny Depp is more affected by amber Heards behaviors than a lot of other men, and Johnny depp doesn't 'scratch her itch' and amber can't let go because of that.
4-D Man, you have most eloquently hit the nail on the head here in describing the behavior of a narcissist scorned! Thankfully, she has zero credibility even though her flying monkey, Elaine, has taken it upon herself to perpetuate her narrative on the talk show circuit. I just pray for Johnny's sake that nothing comes of it.
Agreed. Well said 👍👍👍
All I know is this woman LIED, FABRICATED events, and FAKED evidence. She was also extremely abusive and admitted to hurting her husband several times. She is clearly UNWELL and needs help. I’m glad we saw the entire court proceedings and the jury found in Depp’s favor.
Im sickened to know she LIED about things that actually happens to REAL victims. I hope she gets help for the sake of that poor child in her care.
I really keep going back to Isaacs testimony when he just said he wanted everyone to heal and move on. It’s sad that AH doesn’t seem to be going that direction after everything. Hopefully johnny will
She took these scenes of fake violence from 3 movies!! Lol
She’s going bankrupt
Well, I don't think even the real victim get hit quite as much as she described. Mostly because about halfway through the story there'd be nothing left to hit.
She leaked too
Elaine should be called out for smearing the Jury and the Judge on TV.
As well as the general public.
And defaming women at large
It was a good thing that the trial was televised because who knows what shenanigans they could have done if it was not and more people probably would have believed that Amber got injustice instead of seeing how horrible she and the lawyer was lol
Yes indeed I think so too
Also the lie of the cream that she say Amber claimed she always used when
she was with Johnny
The company said that it was produced in 2017.
Elaine and amber lying, I don't know maybe This can be included later
I’m a time traveler from 2059, and Amber it’s still trying to fight the verdict.
That is so funny
Who is president?
im from another universe and this guy plays Jim in our world
Who would have guessed?
Did they put the coke back in Coca-Cola in your time period?
During Amber’s testimony she specifically said it was about him she tripped herself up and said that on the stand. The jury got that.
And the fact that Ms. Vasquez didn’t press her on that was brilliant. She would have lied her way out of the statement.
@@orlencadelacruz5166 Never interrupt your enemy when they make a mistake! Unless your enemy is Amber Heard, and they'll dig themselves further into a 'pledge-donation' hole, it's a fine balance that Camille utilized very well.
Of course it was about him unless she was married to someone else at the same time.
She did so thrice.
A PART OF ME WISHES I COULD WRITE OP-ED, BUT THE PROBLEM IS I'M NOT FROM THE U.S OR THE UK. B/C I AM A WOMAN, AND B/C MY DAD WAS A VICTIM OF DV!!!!! Johnny's DONE enough!!!!!! I'm just going to right now boycott any paper or any outlet believing and spinning this same narrative!!!!!!!! AND I DON'T CARE WHAT MOVIE HE COMES OUT W/ NEXT, I WILL BUY A TICKET NO MATTER WHAT AND GO SEE IT!!!!!!!!!
She would be the one to write, “that protect men accused of abuse” instead of “protect abusive men”. Almost like she knew he was innocent and protecting people accused of something they didn’t do is a good thing.
I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that the ACLU made her word it that way. She had them help her with the article, precisely so she could avoid being sued for defamation.
This looks SUPER bad on the ACLU.
Well wouldn't be inconvenient to get sued again for defamation for the first public statement after the trial. Opps!
@@corvardus I think they were reading the one that got her sued
This is their mentality. Accusations are as good as evidence against men. Because believing all women is unconditional.
It’s very telling!
She should definitely be forced to pay. You can't have her get away without actually paying a price or shes gonna do this every time.
It's all good, she pledged it.
She’ll probably file bankruptcy and discharge the debt. 🙄
@@tonistark4169 you can't file bankruptcy for court loses.
That's not saying that he will ever see a dime as they can tie it up in red tape forever, but the debt won't be dismissed unless Johnny himself doesn't go after it.
She’s 8 million in debt and like he said before she will have to take a loan of around 10 million to pay him within the pay off date to Johnny, plus interest
dude even if she raised 10m to appeal, the evidence is so overwhelmingly against her, and that judge was so extremely fair and impartial, she isn't going to get a better result
Impartial*
@@soufianelhouda yes impartial, thank you xD
Actually would probably lose even more money
On appeal, JD has better foundation to overturn the 2 mil. Much better.
It takes a lot to get an appeal and even more to a panel to look at the evidence again. However, based on the decision by the jury, her own judgement for 2 million is more likely to get over turned than JD's. She could end up spending millions, just to owe another 2 million to JD.
While the idea of him not making her pay because "it's not about the money" is noble, she wouldn't learn a lesson that way.
I think Public humiliation was a lesson.But also as a warning for anyone around her.
I don’t think she is capable of learning, either way if he gets any money,perhaps donate to children’s hospital.
@@annavictrix that's right it's hard wired especially if the trauma started in childhood eg neglect,abuse, narcissist etc.The first start to changing is to admit they have a problem let alone a diagnosis!
She wasn't able to pay her 7 million pledge, you think she can or will pay Johnny?
@@annavictrix Totally agree...similar Mother too!
Elaine said it was horrible that Amber had to testify in front of cameras as a DV survivor. I say that it shows Johnny's strength as a DV survivor that he insisted cameras were there ❤️
He also knew how she would act and he wanted the WORLD to see it!!!!!
I think the two millions she got are a good thing because it is harder to claim now the jury was prejudiced against AH. I mean, yes, AH and her team do anyway but it makes these claims even weaker than they were already.
Yeah i reckon they had that in mind, to give her a little win so there's no bias
@@BrayOfTheDonkey Probably, yes. I guess so, too but at the end I don't care. I just think it's good no matter if on purpose or not.
I don't think jury prejudice.her evidence quite weak and her witness didn't help her.they didn't see JD hit her and her sister testimony about stairs incident different from her story
@@maya-ot4zj Nobody said they did prejudice her. 🤦🏻♀️ We said since AH got 2 millions herself AH's team saying they would have prejudiced her is weakened as an argument.
Amber prejudiced the jury against herself though.
As a person who didn't care about the outcome of the going in, it wasn't until amber took the stand that made me turn on her. Like if she would lie about egregiously violent bottle rape, what wouldn't she lie about.
Yet perjury is a crime...
She lied over and over, to authorities, the jury etc...
It was in a civil court though. The judge can recommend a perjury investigation and the DA can then bring charges in a criminal hearing, but given the nature of the trial as well as the wealth of the parties, it is very unlikely.
But, after the judgment, AH is broke, so she might be held to the standards of "normal" people for once, who knows.
Even then unless she is criminally charged, indicted, and convicted, under the eyes of the law is not guilty (legally speaking, not layman speaking, I think she likely lied on the stand).
This is a civil court case so she is liable for defamation. The events of this case may be used a evidence in a following proceeding if the prosecutor thinks it is a case worth going for (usually meaning they will win). Plus it only has been a few days since, we shall see if charges are filed and she has to go to criminal court. If it helps, she is being investigated by the Australian government for lying to an official regarding for dogs (but it is messy because Depp protected her then and likely doesn't want to get involved).
@@coolyeh1017 "LIKELY LIE". SHE DEFINITELY LIED ON THE STAND!!!!!!!!!
Oh, most definitely.
Unfortunately, she's not going to get in trouble for doing that though.
She is guilty. Use English. She was proven in court to have committed crimes. The end. Stop defending propaganda
They always forget that in her ending testimony she admitted that she did write it about Johnny because she wanted to take him down!
BUT...WE KNOW THE JURY DEFINITELY HEARD THAT!!!!!!!!!! THANKS to CAMILLE'S AMAZING CROSS-EXAMINATION & GETTING UNDER AMBER'S SKIN!!!!! I don't think she has EVER BEEN STOOD UP TO LIKE THAT BY ANOTHER WOMAN EVER!!!!!!!!!
@@tammyboon6259 f
This verdict is such a win for MeToo, or at least what MeToo stood for when the phrase was put in use. ANYONE can be a victim of abuse, both men and women. and we need to listen to the victims regardless of gender. If THAT is not a win for equality, I don't know what is.
Amber should not be given preferential treatment to be Heard, because of her gender.
EXACTLY!!!!! Last nite I looked up to see if there was a word opposite of misogyny and to my surprise there is!!!!!!! AND then I read the official definition of sexism. AND for the 1st time realized that sexism isn't just about men but can be used referring to women and special privileges they like this!!!!!! SO...it is sexist how they're treating Amber. JUST now how we usually see it.
Ben Chew gave such a good argument in his closing, that in Johnny's case there simply is no,
"ME-TOO." Just AH. AND the woman who testified for Amber said that when he thew something, it wasn't near her at all!!!!!!! Obviously he was mad, but he didn't pick up something and throw it directly at her to hit her!!!!
Given MeToo jumped on Ambers case as soon as she came out and stood by her baseless claims, this is not a win for them. MeToo fails at a very fundamental level. They are not out there collecting evidence, they are not funding lawyers to support court cases, they don't have any useful contribution other than libel and slander in the media.
Now that AH's case is over (for now) it should be clear why this movement is so wrong. Anyone with a claim gets a bunch of media attention. Whether it is founded or not. And don't get me wrong, I'll trust anyone who tells me they were abused. It's a terrible thing to make up. But I'll wait for a police investigation or court case to act.
The next time MeToo steps forward, they better do their due diligence. Abuse is wrong, but so is what they've been doing blindly trusting everyone.
lol it never changed
Amber did this to Johnnys only young daughter and she claimed she loved him-? She Never loved him. Elon was in their bed in less than one month after their wedding.
Ambers friend Rockys husband said Amber had at least 30 diff people in her bedroom late at night while Johnny was gone
Really!!!!
i think she use sex to make connections with famous strong ppl
+ sex addict
She confessed on the stand to maliciously writing the OP ed in the defamation trial she didn't realize it but she did and that was all the jury needed to prove it.
YEP....B/C ANOTHER STRONG WOMAN BUT NOT ABUSIVE BEAT HER AT HER OWN GAME!!!!!!!! I KNOW SHE'S GOT TO BE REALLY PISSED AT CAMILLE VASQUEZ MORE THAN ANYONE ELSE!!!!!!! She's gonna NEED security for awhile!!!!!!!!
That statute about posting bond before filing the appeal makes her lawyer's morning show appearance even more hilariously dumb! In the same 5 minutes she said they would appeal and also said she could not possibly afford to pay the judgement. She literally admitted she can't afford to appeal. 🤣
They probably wanted her insurance to cover new lawyer fees and the bond required to appeal, but for some reason I have a hunch that she has already capped out.
@@Hemestal most insurances have a clause stating that judgment costs won't be covered. So they insurance probably paid for her attorney fees but won't cover the $10.35 mil.
In the article she didn't mention him by name.
I think what made the jury decide she did defame him was her LITERALLY saying in court she wrote the op-ed about him.
GOD it's so satisfying to see the American justice system actually WORK knowing the world was watching-literally the world.
I know the world was watching cause a certain Aussie man covered the case here on CZcams.
Io Italy 🇮🇹💙
An aussie = LITERALLY THE WORLD
And Mexico.
@@tnorki well that was just the fun reference i wanted to make lol.
It looks like people in Italy, Mexico, even as far as the caribbean islands watched it where they call Amber a horrible person with that nice french accent, people in the UK and Poland watched it, people in the Ukraine watched it. It was everywhere.
@@sillyseattlecat that's fair but per the law as Rottenborn stated it was on her side simply because she didn't outright name him by name. He stuck to the law and if Elaine never once opened her mouth I actually think Heard might have won. He is a good lawyer.
Heard had her lawyers review and approve the article, there's basically zero chance of her being able to sue them for something that she reviewed and approved.
Different attorneys
@@catytheredheadedalaskan8118 true, but irrelevant to whether she could successfully sue the ACLU. She might be able to sue her lawyer for negligence, but that would also be a long shot.
The JK Rowling title was the 2020 UK defamation action vs the Sun, where a judge who has a son who works for the Sun's parent company, and who previously worked in the law firm which represented AH, found that AH and her witnesses were overwhelmingly credible (even when pleading guilty to perjury and suborning perjury) while JD and his witnesses (including police officers) were universally non credible ruled against JD, then confirmed he was completely correct in deciding not to permit an appeal.... with no jury, AH as a non-party not subject to any discovery etc.
(Following the verdict and Elaine's continued misstatements of fact and law a direct request to the higher appeals court might be possible in the interest of justice).
That's because the standard for proving that publisher didn't have good enough reason to believe a claim is generally extremely high. The fact JD managed to show 2 of the 14 claims as not believable is actually a decent success.
Great breakdown here on the Miss Turd verdict, that part about "the manager meeting & the sh1t" had me dying 😂 I do believe Miss Turd now regrets staring at the jury creepy AF when answering questions, it's like she finally got a genuine critique on one of her shatty movies roles 😏
Video aside, I love how Asmongold allows the video's sponsors to play through. Maybe it's just a way to avoid the person trying to take his videos down, or maybe it's just him being a nice guy. He also links good videos to his audience so they can like the video. Super cool of him.
How come they didn't question her about the implants/injections she clearly has on her face? Couldn't it be the reason of her redness and injuries in photos?
Medical records like that can’t come in as that would violate HIPPA, and the claim would fall to heresy evidence not worth the fight as her evidence was flimsy
Good point
That will lack in foundation or hearsay
I had no idea! Thanks for the clarifications
They may have not necessarily known. I'm a woman & have never had that done, so I wouldn't have picked up on that. BUT...NOW I KNOW IF I WAS EVER ON JURY DUTY RELATING TO THIS!!!!!!! That and the bruise kit!!!!!!
Yeah I really don't get the "I didn't say his name" defense.
"My husband abused me"
"Your husband abused you?"
"I didn't say his name"
She was talking about another Husband?
"I use sexual partners and husbands synonymously so I have lots of husbands."
It's in reference to the op ed. She refers to "powerful men" in general. It was a reach by depps team bc she was obviously referring to the likes of Matt Lauer, Harvey Weinstein, etc. In her op ed about women "being punished for speaking out"
@@nickguzman1734 No, she admitted on the stand in her last testimony that the article was about him. And that she wrote it because she “knew how many people would support him”.
She threw herself under the bus.
Also : “two years ago, I became a public figure representing DV”, that is in reference to the TRO that she got against JD after accusing him of DV.
And JD was the ONLY person that she EVER accused of SA and DV.
BTW, you don’t have to mention someone’s name in order to defame them, simply referencing them or writing something that CLEARLY indicates that you’re talking about them is considered defamation.
If you actually watched the trial, you would’ve known that, the judge said that in the jury instruction.
Also, if you look at the email that was sent to AH by her lawyers (in which AH hires lawyers from ACLU to check her OP-ED before she posts it to basically make sure she doesn’t get sued for defamation from JD), in her original OP-ED that she wrote, there were sentences like : “my ex-husband” and “when I got my TRO”, basically clearly talking about JD, which was later on corrected and removed by her lawyers in the final version of the OP-ED.
She was CLEARLY talking about him, you gotta have a single digit IQ to not understand that she’s talking about him.
It's not a defense, it's a cope. Legally speaking, defamation has never required you to actually name the person you are defaming. If the identity of the person you are defaming can be reasonably arrived at from context clues and details given (either in description, timing, location, or titles) that's enough. It's a lot like violating HIPAA, actually.
Hats off to Asmongold and other CZcamsrs for following Depp Heard. This is the first time in history social media has been used for ensuring cultural fair play. Imagine the trial without social media following it - the MSM’s fantasist reporting in the wake of the result would be the dominant narrative. Not anymore!
🚫🍞
I think Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial would fall into that category too.
It's a fantastic demonstration of what good social media can do (most of the time it just spreads stupidity)
@@fionarangel9486 Totally agree. Historians of the future will find this case notable and a turning point: that social media began to provide the checks and balances than the establishment and media failed to uphold. The corruption of British justice began with Cheri and Tony Blair - using the HRA and Supreme Court (unelected!) - they created an enormous human rights industry that has been feeding off the belly of our taxes for decades. Total scum - especially in these times of severe hardship.
The point isn't whether she mentioned him by name, the point is whether she designated him, and she absolutely did.
I wish JD had hidden cameras inside the place so they could have seen AH and her friends trash the place.
Lol hes probably too nice to want to spy on people
Remember how recording someone without their knowledge and consent is illegal. Those recordings wouldn't be accepted in court at all
@@garreonlefay6703 no it's not
Garreon LeFay I guess we'll have to take down everyone who has ever used footage of random bustling city streets in movies and videos.
@@garreonlefay6703 wrong... did you even see the vid amber took of jonny pouring a megapint, without his knowledge.... played as evidence in court.why even say something when you clearly dont know.
This is the first person I've heard who explained the second count of AH's CC in a way that makes sense to find this statement in AH's favor. Thanks for posting this.
Yet that line b. Is true and truth is not defamation. It was some kind of compromise.
@@nadagabri5783 It's the point about under the direction of a "publicist AND attorney" that wasn't proven to be true.
@@nadagabri5783 This. She did not PROVE it was truthful, which was her burden of proof. They should not have found for defamation there. So definitely a comprimise.
@@sj4iy agree. Plus two groups of cops came that night, testified no damage to home, no injuries Def a compromise. After June 24th, it will be very interesting to hear from the jurors. At least one if not all will be willing to speak out
Or maybe because when the cops came a second time they also found no damagers as well. Thus it would have been a false statement and therefore defamation.
They should do a new objection for when a witness is pretending to cry: Objection Tearsay!
lol!!!!! 🤣🤣🤣
Lol 😆 🤣 😂
Amber and her lawyers are trying to bait Johnny, they want a reaction from him and his team. I hope him and his lawyers see what they're trying to do. They know he'll look bad if he dose anything after Johnny said he was done and wanted to move on with his life, they want to prove their narrative that Johnny wants to go after her and won't leave her alone.
Johnny's team had been running circles around Elaine for weeks, she is neither good nor supple enough to bait anyone not high on crack.
YET....BUT HE TEAM IS TOO SMART FOR THAT!!!!!!! IT NEVER WORKED TRYING TO BAIT HIM!!!!!!!
I don’t see how that would be negative for Johnny to respond. Because it’s not that he isn’t moving on with his life, it’s that Amber’s team won’t let him with what they are doing.
@@paytonyoder1260 that's not how they or their supporters see it though, you're not looking at it from their point of view. Some media outlets are already trying it, saying all this shit to get a response from him to back up Amber's claims. I've dealt with people like this before, they'll say and do anything to provoke a reaction from you and spin it to make you look bad.
@@Foxhound94 that’s just the media in general. They will spin things to make people they don’t like look bad. So why pander you them when you know already that they don’t like you? They aren’t open to having their mind’s changed so why not punish them for their bad actions? Their point of view isn’t the one that matters because it’s nearly impossible to sway them. The point of view that matters is the people in the middle, the ones that are mostly neutral on it.
Jury said YES for every turd found in the bed. Justice has been served.
I really don't like LegalEagle. I remember seeing Videos from him where he stated his opinion and what should happen, when he clearly knew the Law stated something else. I think the best "Lawtubers" are guys like Rekieta Law,Legal Mindset,Emily Baker.
They're more my style too.
Viva Frei is great too. Can't stand legaleagle.
@@Crazen2 Viva is the most wholesome guy on the internet
@@Crazen2 Viva Frei is a cool dude. Not a big fan of that Cigar Guy tho.
So many victims of DV relate to JD and so many abusers relate to AH.
An interview between Asmongold and Rekieta would be great
There will never be a appeal. Karma is a bitch for Amber. So well deserved.
How many times did she lie on the stand ??
SHE STILL NOW OWES JOHNNY OVER 8 million dollars 💵
He doesn't want it.
Plus the money she still owes to the charities!
She'll pledge it
@@justshrug oh
There's no way to definitively say Rocky, IO, and Rocky's bf were willingly complicit in the conspiracy- but since they were grifting off his homes, it checks out.
Also, Rocky was there when Amber screamed "STOP HITTING ME" when he wasn't even close. IO and Rocky called the police as a result of Depp claiming he wanted a divorce. Rocky was also implicitly involved in her courthouse bruise photoshoot. She was photographed with Amber the next day laughing without Amber's bruise. So it's pretty clear what happened here. Amber's extortion demands literally involved demanding multiple penthouses for her and her friends- who'd already been stealing his money.
All of those falls into speculation, unfortunately. Unless they were able to get those two on the stand and grill them for their stories, then there's no hard evidence supporting such claims.
I wonder if the jury had know that punitive damages would be reduced to $350,000 maximum allowed...
...if they would have awarded Johnny more than the $10 million compensatory? 🤔
The court does not tell the jury that because they don't want it to effect the way the jury awards the money.
That is precisely why they don't get told.
legal eagle, i already feel filthy.
Preach, Legal Beagle is a plague.
"Imagine if this was your life, people just following you around spamming you with flashes"
Took me back to call of duty LAN parties. They took my sight, but they left me the memories.
I haven't taken this guy seriously since his content on Captain Marvel. He made a video manipulating the law to support Captain Marvel's actions against the biker. Essentially he tried to claim that the biker being a little creepy but otherwise harmless constituted assault and that she had a self defence legal defence for attacking him. It's complete BS and any lawyer who can willingly try to deceive the public like that doesn't deserve your view
remember EFAP Showed that video of his, Oh boy.
i used to watch his stuff but he constantly flips sides, plays the drama and is inconsistent.
she is still going to have to answer for perjury and also to Australia and several other places perseids perjury is quite a big thing she should do jail time she premeditated everything she did was Johnny just to ruin his life and his children but understand she lied under oath that is a jail offense Australia really has her for what she did there and if the UK was smart they pick that back up and turn it all back where it should have been in Johnny's favor because she also perjured herself in that courtroom as well
She should stop this crazy and dissappear for good ovoid jail for waisted precious time for trial a totally insane and fak
As a non gamer....I really am enjoying you expanding into lots of other areas. Also AH should have to pay more. Compensation shouldnt rely on income or assets. In criminal cases judges can give 244years, now who's got that many years? Thanks
Amber Heard, or someone close to her, even opened a website (just after the trail ended) asking for donations; so she could pay the money she owes and go in appeal... And they actually got already a fair amount of donations in, before the website was shut down, due to some legal issues...
AH should always be Auction House.
@@coolhandjoyce9946 interesting. Im not from the US, but I've read that with taxes she has to pay about double what was granted, it also isn't exempt if she files for bankruptcy(it's payment plans 4 life!!). I'm sure Elon will hook back up with her, he may be tech savvy, but horrendous at chosing partners. I'm sure she'll snake herself around some payroll. Thanks for that info. Take care.
@@coolhandjoyce9946 OMG really!!! That's is a lot audacity,🤨 and I do wish she appeal just for the Simple Facts of the amount of fire 🔥🔥🔥 she will get,
@@coolhandjoyce9946 ehhhh, actually it was closed down because it was found to be not in connection with AH or her legal team. It was a kickstarter campaign posted by a supporter of hers, asking to raise a million dollars towards her verdict payout.
I'm shocked Legal Eagle didn't have a meltdown. I used to watch his channel until he went off the rails after a very strong swerve to the left.
he always keep things professional in his videos wether you agree with him or not. he is most of the time calm
Yeah, used to watch him talk about how the law was depicted in TV and movies ....then along came Trump and Legal Eagle went off the rails
You could try Hoeg Law. He is a bit more dry, but usually tries to keep opinions at least a bit to himself. Also he focuses a lot on video game news in the law.
@@Biga101011 Thanks, I'll check it out!
Same I guess he couldn't BS this one.
During the time of fantastic beasts I was on contract for WB, and I sent a lot, ALOT of articles about the allegations and then articles. The allegations and articles definitely had an effect on his career, especially given it happened during me too.
Love your raw honesty, wish more shows were like yours..
Well, I think the repeated lying on the stand by AH were a big factor the punitive damages. It just shows a immense lack of integrity.
If people looked into Johnny's background they would know he is a gentle soul. Anything Johnny said to Amber was in response to the abuse she has done to him. How could she do this. I can only think she planned it before they got married.
What money or properties Johnny has doesn't define him. He's a damn human being and has a right to be treated with dignity, decency and love. She's a very nasty and cruel woman.
We all love Johnny. He has a heart of Gold and a wonderful mind. He gives us his all and he deserves the same back🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🙋🙋😊😊🌻🌻🌻👍🌷
very rightly said
Awesome! One of my favorite youtubers watching one of my top 3 youtubers!
Love Legal Eagle! Hope Asmon reacts to more of his videos since he can be pretty funny.
I can imagine jury duty will have significantly less no-shows after this case.
But the case dragged on forever. Very few people want to take their chances on being sequestered away from their lives and livelihoods for multiple weeks.
@@Shalakor you aren’t, you go home every day at 5pm it’s literally just like going to work. They pay you your salary and travel costs. So literally a non issue. I’ve done jury twice now.
@@davidpeat1010 pretty sure it's illegal to be fired for jury duty too
@@davidpeat1010 Well, obviously actual outright sequestering isn't very common statistically, but it's still a fear a lot of people hold.
Most cases don't take 6 weeks lol.
Those idiots that try to say they both win, make me laugh so much. Even Amber admitted she lost. Get over it.
And she never admits to anything!
@@kellicat6352 well technically she didn’t admit, she said it was a step backwards for all women. So you are right !
The dude explaining the technicalities of the law has to say they both won, because for the purposes of what he's talking about, that is the case.
Depp obviously got the moral victory, but the video is about the legal mechanics of the verdict.
That's normal for LegalEagle, he never goes into the facts, he just talks about how the law works on a technical level.
He relies a lot on facts, that's how he analyzes the case. He doesn't give his opinion. It's nice to hear someone talk about the case objectively for a change
Technically both won, but the degree is where they differ. Johnny won the most because of the amount for his compensation, clearing of his name, and future prospects of film. Amber won little because of the lack of evidence of the claim about her friends and her fabricating evidence, thus letting her have 2 million for compensation. Her public image is smeared, and any sane production or film company wouldn't want anything with her.
Love this show..keep on keeping on !
He lost me as soon as he said “they both win.”
Same.
Yeah amber lost big time. And tbh amber shouldn't have even won anything. The 1st and 2nd group of cops testified the penthouse was perfectly fine. Amber's friends were definitely in on it as well. If the jury saw the bodycam footage they would have known something was up with the friends.
@@PineappleBaconPizza did they not see the bodycam footage? they did show that during the trial.
He was being sarcastic
you don't get it
The only time she had paparazzi was when she called them unless she was with Johnny 🤷♀️
Of course ...i found oit who amber is during this trial..... the whole world knows who Johnny Depp is! And she never loved him...
love these reactions
Lmfao. Dude when you made the Jim reference, I could not unsee it. Lol. Perfect!
Did you watch Rose's video regarding the conflict of interests in the UK trial? Apparently The Sun is owned by Murdoch and there is a Murdoch on board of directors at Tesla. Plus, the judge and his wife are really good friends with Murdoch, inferring that Andrew Nichol should have recused himself.
The used to watch legal eagle break downs all the time but having watched the Depp/Heard trial myself I see how superficial his breakdowns are
Almost like people have different takeaways from events. 😅
Doesn't make them superficial, they just have different opinions.
Girl please. He is just not biased and doesn’t jump on the bandwagon. He is a Lawyer and breaks down just how boring but difficult laws are.
Doesn’t mean it’s superficial, it’s matter of Fact.
Maybe you have it the other way around. Stay in school.
You should watch his Kyle Rittenhouse analysis. Totally wrong, lol.
Oh god, the accursed Amber Heard stands
@@XnxxD the dude unironically thinks running at a guy with a gun and not getting shot after making death threats straight of suicide watch as a convicted child molester is a god-given right.
Legal Eagle keeps getting called out by other lawyers, being wrong so many times. Viva Frei, Robert Barnes and 90% of online lawyers despise this guy.
I dont understand how he retains a fanbase. Probably an echo chamber of fans. Cuz he is so often just... Completely mistaken. And provably so.
Can't stand him myself.
He's said a lot of nonsense and doesn't even attempt to keep his personal politics out of things.
He's about as genuine as his bookcases.
Well, he isn't a trial lawyer afterall.
Yeah, I'm not listening to Barnes sorry. No civil rights lawyer that helped Rittenhouse and votes for Trump's atrocities is going to get my vote.
glad you reacted to LegalEagle. he makes some good content
I don’t know why but your commentary about commentary makes me happy. Lol. Your pretty entertaining.
Our culture does not protect men that are accused of assaulting a woman, A man accused of this will immediately be thrown under the bus regardless of what his standing was before the accusation, he will lose his job, a portion of his family will disown him, and all but his closest friends will cut ties to him. Just accusing someone of this will immediately have him lose almost everything that he's worked for.
Which is why we need more cases like Johny’s to turn that tide because right now the type of mob mentality that you described utterly lacks integrity.
What?? Yes it does lmao
@alexis avalos Name a single case where a person's life isn't immediately affected by the accusations before he even makes it to court.
Even if Waldman's statement wasn't correct ...why was it worth 2 million? Given how eager Hollywood and the media were to support her, it's unlikely it had an effect on her career. I mean, I'd heard all about AH's accusations before the trial, but I didn't know about Waldman or his allegations.
Depp lawyers probably agreed so she has no chance to win an appeal.
1 or 2 jurors likely threatened to hold out and hung the jury unless Amber got something.
props for including legal eagles sponsors. I don't know why but I feel like reacting to content and including pretty much all of it adds integrity
You are the best. I love your reactions.
Legal Eagle is the worst...
So what if the compulsory money is too high its okay not to pay, I've never heard of someone not paying what the judge order them to do, Whouldn't she just do to jail. Men are still force to pay for child supper while there in jail for christ sakes and this woman can find any way to earn $250,000 and make forty payments. If she quit fight and wasting money to defend her "right" to commit despicable defamatory slander against another she could pay off the money in less than five years.
Lmao your thoughts on the ads for younger/older people was hilarious. Loved it
I like this Asmongold guy! Love his reactions to this whole thing! Especially in the last video he posted on it.
Oh no, not the Legal Smeagol
Legal Beagle
I agree. The punitive damages for Johnny Depp was a clear thought by the jurors that they wanted to punish Amber through her pocket since this wasn't a criminal case. It should be criminal what she did to Johnny and his children. His children went through hell bc of what that monster Amber did. His kids would have testified on their dads behalf in this court case but Johnny Depp would not let that happen bc he didn't want to put them through any of this. Johnny didn't want to do this but Amber would not stop. Also lying about donating her divorce settlement to 2 different charities that really pissed me off and she will never take responsibility for that. Also after the jury awarded in Johnny Depps favor she said she was sorry to women who are in abusive relationships that she let them down WTF!!!!!! No JOHNNY Depps win is a huge impact on all women and men who are victims or survivors of domestic violence relationships that they will be taken more seriously. Especially men who are abused.
Oh. I watched LegalEagle earlier and thought this would be a great react. Didnt know he watched it onstream.
I love how Amber's lawyer is like.. the jury must of googled JD/AH stuff online when they went home.
But she said nothing like this during the trial
I wonder why they only bring it up after they lost 🤣🤣
I think it’s because he specifically mentioned syncing up with a lawyer and publicist and that was a little too far
AH did mention on the standard that on that particular occasion she contacted her lawyers before calling the police, and they advised her not to give a statement to the police!
@@emmacurtis1848 That still doesn't prove that they collaborated to frame Johnny as the accusation said. It's standard legal advice to never speak to the police if your lawyer isn't present.
@@TomyLopex EVEN WHEN YOU'RE CLAIMING TO BE THE VICTIM!!!!!!! I'VE NEVER HEARD THAT BEFORE?!?!
@@tammyboon6259 Yeah, don't talk to the police period. Even with all the holes and faults in her testimony, imagine if she did talk to the police and said something that could be used against her or proven false, my guess it's a played a big part in being to win that one allegation.
@@TomyLopex Okay but I mean a true victim whose been beat up by a boyfriend or husband. I DON'T THINK THEY WOULD NEED A LAWYER FIRST!!!! THEY WOULD NEED THE POLICE and PROBABLY BE IN THE HOSPITAL CONSIDERING HOW SHE HAS DESCRIBED WHAT HE HAS DONE TO HER!!!!! IF HE REALLY HAD BEEN PUNCHING HER FACE WITH THOSE RINGS AND HIS STRENGTH!!!!! SO...HER CALLING HER LAWYER FIRST, I WOULD BE SUSPICIOUS IF I WAS A COP AND I SAW NOTHING WRONG WITH HER!!!!!!
I remember that the UK was demonizing Snoop Dog and going all torch and pitchforks when he was going there. That was until the Queen herself said ‘he didn’t do anything and he can come.’
Kinda funny with the queen intervening
Wasnt that because he got in to a punch up with the police at Heathrow though?
And the body can also clears her of it too. And that last couple words I think made a big difference saying the second police call was placed prior to doing the wine/rough up vs stating it generically or after the 911 calls
The AH vs. JD case got Asmon to review two of my favorite lawyer channels POG
He gave her everything, and then took everything. Good for JD!
The aclu is suing him from what I heard ... it's like 80k or so I personally think Disney should honor the contract with Depp for pirates 6 also for fantastic beasts 3 .. the reason they fired him was falsely reported
I think he did get paid for FB3 (around $10 million, if memory serves), even if he wasn't in the film itself. Given how bad the film is, he probably dodged a bullet there.
the aclu is about law fee's in preparing the documents for JD's subpoena, fucks padding the bills alot, 1 lawyer was getting $600 an hour
She admitted twice on the stand the article was about him!
“That’s why I wrote the opening-Ed about Johnny”
Great breakdown!
Nick Rekieta >>> Legal Eagle
Definitely
Somebody tie Jim's hands down. He's not a hummingbird.
Legaleagles it's always sunny in Philadelphia videos are always great. BIRD LAW
One of these days I need to catch one of your streams.
Im wondering where the story of the unusual 'use' of the wine bottle (not the one thrown at Johnny's finger) with Amber came from?
Was that a mutually consensual thing? Was it a drug induced false memory of Amber's? Did she 'borrow' the story from elsewhere?
Supposedly she stole the story from her ex assistant..not sure if that's true though.
It could be drug induced after she heard (hehe, heard) it from a film, a friend, or a pron video idk.
I'm happy that Ryan Reynolds took some time out of his busy career to become a lawyer and explain this to us.
Oh no
Lmao when he said Jim I was thinking of Jimmy neutron 😂 then he said Jim from the office n I started to die 😂🤣🤣🤣
This was great! You make me laugh so hard !
Depp will now be able to afford his gems in Diablo Immortal 😂
ah yes legal eagle the msnbc of internet lawyers
have you ever seen a legal eagle comment section, a giant self affirming hugbox, filled to the brim with irrational and blatant left wing bias. And don't give me the its his opinion thing. he is pretending to be approaching this from a serious authoratative legal opinion.
Lmao, I just watched this a few hrs ago, and now my guy As is reactin...nice!😃
Two of my favorite CZcamsrs
I wish Elaine will go with circus in every show, her comic stage is very funny and entertaining 😀👍
I don’t think Johnny cares about the money. I think he just wanted the truth out.
Ima LegalEagel sub. He has great content about current issues.
Here's something funny that Asmon's rant about ads reminded me of: before my work beefed up their spam filter, I'd get phishing spam, and there were about two kinds: Stock Tip spam-phishing, and Raunchy spam-phishing. And sometimes, the way they phrased the subject lines, it was difficult to tell which was which!