Amber Heard’s “Abuse Expert” NEVER MET Johnny Depp | Asmongold Reacts to Trial
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 05. 2022
- Asmongold Reacts to Johnny Depp defamation trial, Amber Heard abuse expert never met Johnny Depp. Johnny Depp's Team destroys the biased forensic psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes in cross-examination.
► Asmongold's Twitch: / asmongold
► Asmongold's Twitter: / asmongold
► Asmongold's 2nd YT Channel: / zackrawrr
► Asmongold's Sub-Reddit: / asmongold
Thank you all for watching! Stay tuned and subscribe to the official Asmongold CZcams Channel to always be kept up to date about the best Asmongold Highlights, Asmongold Reacts and funniest Asmongold moments from World of Warcraft, Elden Ring, Lost Ark, Final Fantasy 14 (FFXIV) and other games played on stream!
Channel Editors: CatDany & Daily Dose of Asmongold
► 🎸 Outro song: CatDany - Get Enough
If you own the copyright of content showed in this video and would like it to be removed or the Ad-Revenue made from it please contact::
► / catdanyru
►
#Asmongold - Hry
It's terrifying that she testified that she only needs to hear one side of the story to draw a conclusion about who's the victim and who's the aggressor in a relationship regarding IPV. Insane.
Because she like others...think they can call themselves doctors with these fake degrees and phds...her PhD is similar to one in finger painting
Yes how very 'forensic' of her
@@ianvisser7899 Its not that she can not pick up the bullshit, its because her bias allows her to see past it. She in no way should be practicing physiciatry
@@ianvisser7899 I don't believe that we can ever actually decipher who is the victim in a couple regarding IPV, without listening to both members of the couple, and clarifying what each is saying.
I have been a counsellor working with clients since 2009, and I have learned a great deal from my clients who have come as couples, as well as from individual clients. 🤷🏻♀️🙆🏻♀️
@@GypsyGirl317 I'm sorry, but I'm leaning towards that you can't be sure without physical evidence, third party testimony, video evidence or some such...
Of course in most cases, yeah... reaaasonably sure... but there absolutely exists excellent liars and manipulators that could convince anyone.
Dr. Curry: "My duty is to the court, the fact finder (jury)"
This Doctor: "My duty is to Ms. Heard's Legal Team"
My duty is for I will say u are paying $100/hr...even though I’m gonna actually receive $500/hr!! I would like her job!
Partners in crime! Gotta love it!
Dr.Curry is a boss.
I went to a therapist about DV, we had 3 sessions and then she told me she could go no further til she spoke to my husband. THAT'S non-bias, professionalism. This woman is evil. I can only imagine the trauma and despair she's caused.
@Tonya Harmon I remember the video, let me explain with what I remember on the first, air conditioners are sexist because women get cold easily and this forces them to cover up/wear more layers, something like that
Couples counseling is not necessary part of one-on-one therapy sessions with patients dealing with trauma and abuse. Perhaps she figured you have unresolved marriage issues instead of actual trauma from abuse and wanted to gain some insight on how things actually are working out and what steps could be made to determine progress. But it is not absolutely necessary to evaluate couples together to determine wether someone is suffering from abuse or is borderline sociopath with some fantasies.
I dont believe shes evil . She is obviously of the opinion that its generally men who are the perpetrators , despite what she says about her knowledge of the fact that men can be victims. Heards team have sought her out because of her bias.
@@debbrown3760 yes, that's been said time and time again, that she was sought because of her bias. Evil is perpetrated by allowing her to counsel people in need, twisting them up further with her bias instead of offering true healing and being the professional she proclaims.
She probably bragged about how many cases she "won" during her career... horrible! Knowing she was playing "riun the life of X male".
I love how she says that she has treated men for sexual abuse by scout leaders, teachers etc but never says an intimate partner...
It's blatantly obvious how biased she is
Exactly. She just kept rephrasing and repeating "male abusers" while focusing on 'but look, there was *also* a male victim in that situation' as if that makes her unbiased.
The audacity of this woman, never met Johnny Depp to get both sides of the story only to take Heards side. This is disgraceful to a psychologist.
I believe what you meant to say was
*The caucacity of this bitch*
Why would she want to meet Johnny? She was already given a script.
@@juliawilly9151 and 500$ per hour
She sold her soul cheap.
yeah all those therapists have not met johnny (exluding dr.curry) and were ready to believe amber on anything and never reported a thing to authorities. The only one who has met Johnny was the marriage counselor dr. Anderson who was sloppy as well in her note taking and was kinda going in the same direction as the other therapists (being influenced by amber) and she didn't ask johnny about the abuse And had the audacity to use the term mutual abuse which is a big NO NO in Domestic abuse/violence situations.
This is how her testimony is dismantled:
1. She has bias because she will not take the case of a man against a woman
2. She determined AH to be the victim of IPV based on her post-divorce meeting
3. Has never spoke with JD unlike Dr. Curry who made her assessment after speaking to both parties.
4. She has not introduced any evidence to support that JD ever abused AH. She just has an opinion.
To be fair to one part of that, it’s probably not that she’s unwilling to take a case defending a man against a woman, it’s that no one is stupid enough to hire her to do so lololo
and Dr Curry only spoke of her assessment of Heard who she talked to and said SEVERAL times that she could only speak about Heard and nobody else because she didn't evaluate them unlike Hughes who IMMEDIATELY called Depp the aggressor and abuser without ever speaking to him. Seems like board certification is literally an actual joke
To be fair about that last point, that's literally what she's there to do. She isn't supposed to provide evidence. She is an expert witness, so her providing her opinion is basically evidence.
@@janitorizamped in the sense that there isn't really any reason for her to really believe it, she just does bc Amber told her so
I am using my husband's phone again. Just to be clear I am a woman observing the progress of this trial and I cannot help noticing the women's state of their hair. Gradually crumbling confidence. I love seeing this forensic PC paid professional (we know what she is, it's just a question of how much she is paid), as well as Ms Terd both having "bad hair days". I watch with glee as the days go by, and her hair gets worse!😂
I love how she had no clue that he was implying she has never testified against a woman as the abuser and she just gave it to him on a plate.
It's appalling that she has a practice. She needs her license revoked IMMEDIATELY, and ALL of her cases she's ever worked on need to be RE-EVALUATED.
Depp's Lawyer nailed it ... geezus - he "had" her about 20% into the conversation and she didn't even realize that his main intention was to point out her prejudice.
He still dropped the ball a bit. They should have been able to impeach her testimony at the end and didn't ask the exact right way to get it impeached
@@jacobmech1 Impeaching her would mean that there would be less evidence of this being manipulative, but keeping her would put this in the minds of the jury that she's sexist so that would benefit JD.
I feel like they needed to drill her more on the bias. How she never testified in a case the male was the abused with the exception of a homosexual relationship.
She did some sketchy stuff with there tests, where applied a test that only regards the last 6 months when it came to violence, yet all the other tests time frames were wayyyyy longer. Feel like they should've pointed that out.
They also dropped the ball in how they went about what, imo, would be the best line of questioning they had, which was the fact that she said along the lines of "amber doesn't have a history of domestic abuse". Which they could then point out how she does have it. They weren't careful in their phrasing of the question so they ended up having to approach and having to drop that line of questioning.
@@HotShame0 actually it would allow them to show the bias in a more meaningful way
@@henriquerodrigues7795 you can rephrase that she has never testified AGAINST a woman. Which to me, further proves her bias
What makes me sick is that she has been attending over 50 hearings as an expert. Imagine those poor souls that she may ruin in her path.
Yes! Exactly! And imagine how many men may have lost their kids, jobs, respect, etc because of her dilusions. Thank God there's men on the jury. If we're feeling this way, they have to be as well.
My thoughts exactly. I also imagine some truly innocent women she’s testified for may have lost their case cos she seems extremely untrustworthy and unlikable.
@@ampleoloruntogbe1434 bingo, I agree with you 100%. To think that some TRUE abuse victims have been convinced by her that they need to pay her $500 per hour to bring validity to their case is sad. Feel terrible for the people that have been wrongly convicted, and like you said, also the people that may have been tricked into using her "services"
And, she seemingly can be bamboozled by a Psycho.
After this trial being highly viewed … lots of people got to see who she was and what she was about. Hopefully it erodes the comfy cushion she’s gotten used to sitting on with more people being aware if they ever find themselves in a situation where she is involved (if people will want to bother hiring her after this massive fail).
I love how she lists all kinds of abuse situations *except* a man being abused by his own wife. She sent so much time trying to defend herself she forgot to defend Amber XD
She thought she could outsmart the wizard destroyer with changing the subject constantly and using elaborate words to dodge the questions
The worst part about her incompetence is how confident she is with it. She acts like she knows more than anyone but refuses to admit her bias. Crazy how people could rely on her as a source of reference in court.
She is extremely arrogant . She got very comfortable destroying people lives without anyone ever questioning her . really bad woman !
It's not that crazy how people could rely on her. I mean, imagine you're someone lying about being a victim of abuse, and you need an expert to testify on your behalf who will support your lie, and you ask your lawyers if they know anyone like that. "OH! As a matter of fact, I have just the kind of person we need on speed dial. She's terrific."
She testifies on behalf of entertainment industry members. And what are they? Liars. So of course she'd make a KILLING lying for money on their behalf.
ARE U A PRIEST ON MIRAGE RACEWAY CLASSIC TBC?!?!?!?!
500/hr babyyyyyyyyy hahaa
Yes!
I'm not a psychologist, but I am a licensed therapist. I can tell you for a FACT that I would never attempt to diagnose someone with whom I have never met. I can also tell you that I have had clients who come in and tell me their side of something, but when their partner or parent joins a session, their perspective can be VERY different, to the point of being completely opposite! I just can't with this doctor.
THANK YOU. An expert of her caliber needs to be conscientious enough to understand which things she CANNOT know…as well as her own limitations and even her potential bias. She seems wholly unaware of any of her limitations or biases in this specific situation or in any situation for that matter…and yet the facts of this case demonstrate otherwise. This woman’s belief in her own omniscience makes her dangerous. This was a very effective cross examination, in my opinion.
I totally agree as a person that was abused for years and had to walk on eggshells this lady is a biased individual and she is a danger to everyone
She said that she didn´t try to diagnose him while only talking about to what diagnosis her "results" lead. Incredible how Ambers Team thought that someone batshit crazy like that would help their case.
I'm still in shock over her spouting off AH's claims to the jury as if they were actual fact. She was so awful I had to leave the live feed. It was sickening.
That's what my therapist told me in my first session, "we are working with your perspective and in this instance it's all what we have, I cannot diagnose or speculate about your partner without actually talk to him"
I like the face she makes when answering questions. She thinks she knows all but have zero awareness that she further digs her own hole that the lawyer pointed her to.
Lawyer doing the cross is brilliant.
“The woman gets into the relationship for all the right reasons.” that right there is complete fuckery. The fact that she said that AT ALL is a massive red flag. Men and women in relationships can and have abused each other. They both can get into a relationship for all the right reasons. They both can be at fault for said relationship going wrong. It isn’t always one or the other, and if it is you should NEVER make such a biased statement in court when generalizing. It isn’t assumption in court, it’s black or white with psychological testimony. She’s trying to create a grey area and then backpedal.
100%
She's not a witness nor is she qualified to assess anybody she hadn't personally talked to. At this point she is a purchased outsider with "qualifications" close enough to assist Turd in her storytelling.
She tried to be Dr. Curry 😤😤😤
@@Griffith307 she failed miserably
Lol
She’s a third person point of view. She’s just saying everything Amber has said lines up. Basically Amber lied on these “tests” to use it as evidence” shes been planning for all of this.
Oh gawd yes! She’s a f’ing fraud!!
@@Griffith307 true she tired but did not work
"I know this person"
"Did you meet this person?"
"No never"
"So how do you know this person?"
"I read about him and saw him on video"
Magical Profession
Absolutely. It’s like “Abra Kadabra and Yaba Daba Do, I’m the expert so f*** you.”
Perfect
She apparently has telepathy and can see the future, to know someone so we'll without having ever met them
I guess I know him too then
Compare that to Dr Curry's response when they mentioned she knew JD: "That is not correct. I did not KNOW Johnny Depp. I've seen his movies and such, but I did not KNOW him." Lawyer: "You know who he is." Dr Curry: "Correct."
Dr. Curry firmly distinguished between knowing - as in recognizing - someone, and knowing - as in know their character, their habit, their behavior.
This one is basically saying a la Hermione from Harry Potter style: "Oh, I know ALL about you. I've read ALL about you." 🙄🙄
That lawyer is a total genius. He practically pulped her in her supposedly own professional field.
It’s weird to me that this “professional” talks with bias towards Johnny but yet have never met him. Tell me she’s being paid to take ambers side. Corrupt.
that's why the defense team was so hard on Dr Curry, and why the first questions were about muffins, dinner and drinks, being paid, etc. ...
It's called projection. 🙂
"I never actually talked to Johnny, but I read his transcript... Thus I'm an expert and he sucks".
"I never actually played Elden Ring, but I watched a Let's Play... Thus I'm an expert and it sucks".
I never actually watched the movie, but I read its plot on Wikipedia... Thus I'm an expert and it sucks".
I have to press 'Read more'?! Screw that, I know this comment well enough to say it sucks.
XD
I watched Matt Locke in a bar last night, the sound wasn't on but I think I got the gist of it.
sir id like to offer you a job for $500 an hour!
@@cygnusereve4779 Well tbf QTV did play elden ring... for like... 10 minutes... probobly.... Its mostly Acerthorn who doesnt play the game at all
She literally said in her direct testimony that Amber punching Johnny was low-violence, but Johnny yelling at her and saying mean things to a friend via text was "severe violence". And essentially that women are always victims and men are always the aggressor because of the power dynamic. Which is BS.
Spot on
Just look at her tho. imagine washing away any make up and shave her hair. There you go, bitter vile human being. She's so bitter, she has no lips left. Nah but seriously, i listened to her for 2min and could already tell she has a deep hate towards men. Even in the same sex cases i bet she made one of the two the evil man.
@@borman2426 You know a lot of the time I'm genuinely surprised how people like that even get the job in the first place lol.
time stamp please 😂 I have to see this
wow gosh, yes BS
Holy shit dude. I am concerned with how many of the cases she made a report that the man lost because of her "findings" without ever getting both perspectives. How does she collaborate the info and ensure everything's accurate if she has no way to know if the "data" she is receiving from the alleged victim is actually truthful?? If you base all your comparing on information that was a lie, you're findings would be incorrect. How can she not see how fucked up that is??!!
She is stating that Amber's recounting of events to her as the absolute fact, that's all the evidence she needs
No interview w Johnny, yet she's made an assessment
How is this even allowed
she's a paid mercenary by the legal defense and has 'worked' for them before...despicable and should lose her license
how many innocent men are in prison bc of her paid lies
Yeah, if you don't have lawyers as good as Depps you are completely fucked.
DON'T BE STUPID. Johnny too has a paid "mercenary" not sure what you even mean by that.
@@christopherone1 well.. not really, at least not a proffessional "mercenary".
It was currys first time in court and shes known and respected "hollywood psychologist".
Ambers "mercenary" is person who literally lives off of ipv (and sort of that) cases. shes also regular for ambers team AND shes shown a bias in her views that are extremely unfair in this case. Curry hasnt.
@@christopherone1 well JD’s ”mercenary” are actually doing a good job and not lying and basing it on ALOT of witnesses whilst AH team are paying a ”expert Witness” to lie under oath and having her only other witness being her mother 🤌🏻
$500 the hour to lie ,
dr. curry: let's talk to everyone to form an oppinion.
dr. hughes: nah, just tell me your side and we'll figure it out.
what a fucking joke of a psychologist - i hope this woman gets her license revoked and all cases reviewed in which she testified.
Don't forget to throw out anything that runs counter to your argument
Bro AH legit could’ve came to her & said he killed someone & she would’ve believed her 😅
Actual question, but are psychologist even supposed to do that? Like why would you automatically believe 1 persons side of the story when there’s 2 & you never met the other person.
@@ventustbb3229 i'm surprised too in the sense that she could say all that stuff without anyone interupting her (maybe so they can point it out and use it against team AH?).
that wasn't talking about professional analysis, but simple bias and a crapload of guessing.
"professional witness" describes her pretty good imo
@@yani9o Has to be bc she is extremely biased. Clearly sexist too. I mean how can she be a professional at anything when she acts like that. AH team & witnesses are complete jokes though tbh. Like the lawyer objecting to his own question 🤡
I was so upset when I found out that she didnt talk to Johnny, and only spoke to Amber and for 30 hours too. What made it worse is that she didnt even know Johnny and she judged him based on what she seen in court.
This is the most biased expert I have ever seen in a trial. She just cherry picked whatever she thought was useful for Amber's case. She ignored anyone that said anything that made Amber look bad....which was a lot! I hope the jury acknowledges how terrible this witness is and discounts her opinion. It is obvious what she is trying to do here!
The worst part is this happens all the time her lies probably worked for ALL her other cases
I love how the "Doctor" is pretending to be non-biased, while showing that she's biased. Lol Words, meet action.
Tell me you're biased without actually telling me you're biased😂😂😂
She has a totally different demeanour today from yesterday
She's not a doctor...PhD needs to stop carrying "doctor" as a sub title just because it seems fitting to the whole word...we see quickly how people love showing that title but then show they don't have the mind of an actual doctor. This needs to stop. Martin Luther King wasn't a "doctor" because he made speeches.
This is not a doctor. She’s a professional testifier.
She is a psychologist, not psychiatrist. So, she is not a doctor and not scientific even she completed postdoctoral training.
She absolutely did use those pronouns and trying to deny it just proves how disgusting she is!!!!!!
From my awful experience in family court, “expert” witnesses are too many times laughable. It’s really sad the lack of ethics.
You can tell this woman is on Ambers side. There’s a lot of money floating around this room and I bet she was paid well with how she speaks
500$ per Hour she said
not how i saw it.
she was her therapist right?`.
they "have" to acknowledge what they believe.
i might be wrong.
@@thealexe99 Dude, for 500 an hour I'd probably do the same. That's a lot of fucking money. I wouldn't be proud of it but one day of work would solve rent issues for a few months
Not well enough
@@-Big_Big she's not her therapist, she did read the notes of both of amber's therapists and decided depp was guilty based on what they wrote that amber told them. she's there as a expert witness regarding intimate partner violence. sHe'S BiAsEd but uNdErStAnDaBlE aS iT's hEr jOb.
edit: changed the caps on the last sentence as people think I seriously support Dr. Karen and Amber Turd.
As a person trying to become a psychologist and therapist, this is a disgrace. Hughes is incredibly biased and emotional, she says she has an incredibly amount of experience but it doesn't feel like it. On her website has a picture of her therapy room. It is FLAUNTED with, in sigh, at least 6 degrees and or achievements. When Hughes talks to someone in trauma with only 1 seat and her on a "wheelie" chair, yes thats actually her chair, Hughes has 6 framed achievements all behind the patients. As my own opinion and how a therapy room is set up, this is incredibly disgraceful and it is like saying "I am better than you... fuck you."
Now that I am more awake and have a little bit of time, here is an edit. For the people not understanding what I mean by this it is because the therapy room is the first thing that starts to build the rapport with the patient. In order for the patient to open up completely and trust you, you need to build that trust. Therefore, you need a therapy room that makes it feel like a second home, a safe space. Dr. Hughes therapy room has a weird looking chair and a 1930s looking couch. As well if I really want to say, the lightning in the room is dim and could bring some depressing atmosphere (but that could have been to take a good picture of the room). As well, the achievements on the wall are the biggest problem, they can cause a demoralizing effect on people, make the trauma victims of abuse think that the abuser was right when they say "you will never amount to anything." I am not saying it is a problem to show your diploma, but what I am saying is that it is a problem to show 6 of them, hovering around the patient like multiple flies around a homeless man.
You can have as much experience as you want that experience doesn’t help when you’re clearly biased
And saying it to people who are likely in a mindset where they'll agree "well fuck, you probably are". Great recovery environment.
It's like she's profiting from it too
And she's probably a teacher too...a bit dangerous don't you think?
@@shaneconquer45 incredibly so, everyone has bias but it is the duty of the teacher/professor to remove enough bias to give a clear fact. Minimum bias not what she has
As a psychology student, the practices of this woman are both hilarious and frustrating. I have no clue how she passed her practical exams let alone that shens able to charge 500 dollars an hour. Wtf is this?!
Every previous case, that this fraud was involved in, needs to be reviewed immediately.
Depp's lawyer is having a career case. No doubt he was highly accomplished before but this trial is making him most sought after lawyer in the country.
Yes, but also they kinda couldve done a better job here, even though I'm not a lawyer so I could be wrong.
And Dr Curry the most sought after psychologist
💯 complete fact.
@@pattondurio Yes and no because I think what they trying to do is leave a lot of things up to the Jury to see her bias base on her testimony. Another thing I have noticed during this trial with the lawyers and witnesses is both side resembles the party they are defending or testifying for. Meaning Amber side seems hostile, rude, angry, lies and bias while Johnny side seems respectful, calm and a bit unbiased and truthful.
@@pattondurio I think most of the time they leave Amber's lawyers to bury themselves and they make themselves seem as not trying too much to bring jury on their side and that difference them from Amber's layers who use hearsays all the time and try too much too appeal to jury.
Never met Johnny but is convinced that Amber is the victim. Believe every storyteller...
No history of violence or abuse with any other partner. AMber "triggers" him... Gee I wonder if it was getting hit all the time, or maybe spit on, punched in the face?
Dawn Hughes the dumbest doctor in the world that charges $500 p/hr.
she did not have to meet him. she just did a interview and did that ITP or something paperwork on Amber
@@luumasaan5782 think they are not supposed to do that.
they just have to collect into and then report on it. from one person. its like the other lady who did the same for Amber.
@@luumasaan5782 you cant, Dr Karen found a niche where you can basically lie(although not technically lie) for money and clout.
I can only hope that she has much less business after this and is looked on poorly by all her colleagues
*Karen Hughes :D
The fact that you, a WoW streamer has been able grow on CZcams with content outside of your PERCIEVED genre of content, is quite impressive. Your views are mostly rock solid, there are a few things (not in this video in particular) where I think you may be seeing more than what's really there to it, but that's just a speculative opinion. Your content is awesome. You've earned yourself a sub from me. 👍
Lok'tar O'gar!
@@slappinthigh Sustained
She reminds me of the couples therapist my ex husband and I saw a couple times before i realize how biased they were towards men I couldn’t take it. I was in an abusive marriage, in all matters, and the amount of encouragement they gave my ex was absolutely disgusting. I stormed out of our last meeting, not cause I was angry, but because I was about to burst out in tears reliving everything from my PTSD.
Which is probably why JD did as well.
Biased experts are DANGEROUS.
I'm not even trying to insult her when I say that Dr. Karen is a disease in the legal system, I wonder how many lives she has ruined during her career of seemingly total bias. I know it almost definitely won't happen, but all of her cases should be thoroughly investigated after this, she is genuinely disturbing.
She IS A TEXT BOOK RADICAL DEMOCRAT that REPUBLICANS ARE ALWAYS FIGHTING IN UNIVERSITIES & GRADE SCHOOLS, WORK PLACES, LEGAL MATERS... A FORM OF WOKE CANCER.
@VargVikernes4Pres Indeed
agreed, it's very scary and unethical
I agree
Agreed. It has been done before!
My stepdad was a violent man, whenever he'd start acting up my siblings and I would hide every single knife and anything he could use to harm us. And this woman gave her agressor a knife, of that size?! I hope JD wins and her career ends.
Not only that, she does drugs with him and indulges with him with alcohol when she claims he's this violent monster. That's the last thing I'd do with someone I felt threatened by.
I know! Also an abused woman would never ever hit her abuser for fear of beating or death
Yes. At best it is an indication of dual abusive behavior. Two aggressive personalities who use violence to maintain dominance in the relationship. But the more audio clips I hear of this case, the more dominate she becomes. And yes she is the one who is using violence. I'd even argue it probably got worse over time as she saw that JD wasn't fighting back.
@@superdave8248 Being that everyone who knows Johnny Depp say that he's not a violent man and has testified on his behalf, including his ex-wives and ex-girlfriends (who likely would have carried the brunt of his so-called "abuse", were it any way true), I'd say the only one dominant in their relationship was Heard. She claims he hit her daily, she claims she was scared for her life, yet there exists audio where she ADMONISHES him for ESCAPING conflict, "hiding" in the bathroom, "running away", etc, and admitting to hitting him (but not "punching", because apparently women can't punch or have the ability to hurt men). It's like Godzilla says, someone who is terrified of their supposed abuser would never hit them, punch them, let alone throw a bottle at them, if they feared what it would lead to.
@@superdave8248 The audio have shown, in my humble opinion, that she was the violent one. There's no doubt that they both were in a toxic relationship, hence when JD endured it for so long - the fact that he had an abusive parent and the other who was an avoidant makes it understandable. When she started crying, her crocodile tears gave me flashbacks. I'm a woman but I hope that people see through her and that she's punished accordingly.
In two minutes she goes from “I don’t provide treatment I only evaluate” to “I treat men of sexual abuse all the time!”
Indeed. Missed that.
Ofcourse, if the lawyer pushed her on that, he would break the rhythm and the next questions were equally as important.
Still, hope the jury caught on.
I've been following the trial for two weeks now and just discovered your chanel yesterday. Watching it with your reaction somehow makes it easier for me as a non-native speaker to be sure I understand things the right way.
It is an absolute shame for this woman. Feel sorry about about innocent lives, she might have ruined. She should ask not to practice her "whatever she claims, do".
I don't get this and I want to know more about the case. It's kind of hard to follow for me. Why does this woman in the wrong?
@@trickprower5738 She testified that AH was a victim of IPV when she neither had ever talked to JD, and also loosely implied in her testimony that she was biased towards IPV against males.
@@trickprower5738 Also, it’s not the job of a psychologist to “detect crimes”
It appears that this doctor has ruined her own career.
They should look into how many men committed suicide after she came up there defaming them and cost them even having visitation with their kids
A "doctor" assessing a couple relationship only talking to one of the two. Very professional
I wonder if she thinks other doctors, such as surgeons for example, can also perform surgery without their glasses (hypothetically they are far sighted) because "they're a professional, they know what they're doing"
It's called being a woman.... Always the mans fault unless you have enough money to prove their BS
She just flushed her credentials down the drain. If ever she has any. 😳
and not only assessing the emotional relationship, testifying that she believed AH to be the victim based on the one-sided report.
"All these professionals disagree with me, so I disregarded it."
Such a professional.
Ladies and gentlemen, this here is what you call a professional Karen
Asmon really hit the nail on the head about him "storming out" of the couples therapy to calm down. My abuser used to always say I was storming off when I was leaving to calm down no matter how calmly and politely I would leave. Didn't matter what I did, in those moments my actions were amplified to suit her narrative.
So a corrupt biased doctor was called to make up BS for Amber? Sweet Christmas, this is complete insanity.
Anyone wondering about this??? Not a single bit.
I just love how even the examples she gives of her "paying attention to stereotypes" were ALL a man's fault. childhood abuse by coaches, teachers etc. then she says "men can be victims too", but never once, on the examples she gave or on her answers she said women can be the perpetrator.
Yeah I noticed that too. So stupid
I mean, I'm totally on your side- Dr. Karen is evil and a misandrist. But... Coaches can be women. Teachers can be women. What am I missing?
Oh, by the way, her sticking with primarily childhood types of abuse is nasty, too. Really shows what she thinks of grown men who endure IPV.
The context of man being a victim was in spouses structure, she knows that, that is the actual context of this trial. BUT she just had to point man being victims in childhood age, never once she factually acknowledged man being victim of abuse in spouse relationships WHEN the perpetrator is a woman.
@@hauntedshadowslegacy2826 I understand that teacher/coach is a tiltle that can be attributed to any gender. But I'm also sure it's pretty obvious that she was deliberately using such genderless words to seem more reasonable than she is, while picturing only male teachers and male coaches on her head. Probably. Idk.
"but never once, on the examples she gave or on her answers she said women can be the perpetrator."
I think the lawyer capably showed her bias. you can't just say you're fair and balanced, you have to demonstrate it too (like you said, when giving examples)
He’s pointing out gender specific so the jury will go back and see exactly where and how many times this expert said she and her before referencing the actual case of AH & JD. She is SO bias towards women. She’s a disgrace.
This Lawyer is destroying her from the very beginning. She dares to day "Thorough" psychological evaluations, when she doesn't even hear both sides of the story.
Also its hilarious that the closed captions call her "misheard".
She already assumed Amber Heard is the victim of the abuse, case closed guys GG.
@NothingIsSomething You can say she didn't do an in Depp analysis.
I guess they didn't want to "waste" jury's time... 🙄
@@shovelthetrench9107 An in Depp analysis was not necessary because she had already Heard everything about him.
When she said "I reviewed his medical records." She admitted to commiting a felony lmao. Unless he signed a medical release form she most definitely did not review his medical anything.
HIPPA ye ye
So it's either a felony, for reading something she wasn't authorized to have access to, or perjury for lying on the stand?
@@LTDoge-dm3jr pretty much, so unless she got a signed document from Johnny that said she could read his medical documents. She committed a felony and should lose her license.
Well let's hope she gets hers then. Prob not HAHAHA
@@natewho4366 idk, maybe there's an immunity in testifying? Like not incriminating yourself, sometimes you can sign those in testimonials.
She’s the reason why some don’t come forward about them being abused, because people like this quack will instantly believe the woman was the one being abused.
Can you imagine how many innocent men have been punished either finically or even put in jail because of this woman? I wish they go back over every single case she testified to and appeal. This woman is a disgrace!
That woman is a true monster.....she dont care if its true or not, she seem like she sits over the morning coffee laughing at which guy should we put in prison next ladies?
Dawn didn't realize, she just nuked her own career by taking the witness stand. Seriously, the entire world is watching this case like a hawk, any current/future clients she has or will have will see how she is trying to evade these questions whilst simultaneously showing her bias and, in my opinion, unprofessionalism, and she's gonna start losing a LOT of business simply from this one case, good riddance to bad rubbish
I think clients who might want her to create a narrative would love her
She’s just another clown in the AH clown car
Nah, women who want to lie about their partners will still happily hire her, but only the ones who can fill her pockets.
Probs the doc will need therapy after this case lol
@@alihajiya2572 not from this testimony. Smdh she could have used her education to show she not biased but isn't. Her problem is she can't she anyone ruling against a woman saying they were abused, even with no evidence so she doesn't feel she needs to cover anything because what does it matter. Ten to one her and Amber do not like each other they both want the same things spotlight and money.
How does this woman have a licence? It's evident that she is bias and is paid for that bias.
Anyone who has been found guilty with her involvement in the trail should be thrown out.
I wish the Wizard would have mentioned that when AHs nurse Erin Fallati saw her immediately after Australia, she came to drop off XANAX at like 1130PM. She was notated as emotionally unstable and stressed but physically fine.
I think one line of questioning I would have asked: when she says that most of the legal settings she's given her professional opinion for are cases that don't end up going to court, which is why she doesn't often testify in court. I would have asked to clarify whether these cases don't go to court because they are unable to go to court, or if it's because they are simply settled outside of court. If they are simply settled out of court, then you can ask whether she uses different standards for her work based on whether the case is already in court vs whether the case only has the potential to go to court.
It's so funny he's tricking her into basically saying, yeah I'm biased and I'm also not too good with this whole testimony thing
If by "tricking" you mean he's not interrupting her constantly, then yes. He's letting the idiot talk herself into a hole.
not going to lie, but the whole time that they were using JD's witnesses there were a lot of people saying to cut the opposite team some slack, but this...this just shows how good JD's legal team is, they just completely deconstructed the bias in society towards women. No matter who wins, the consequences of this trial may actually be a lot bigger than people think and I'm almost certain that JD actually hoped to get those consequences and not an outright win, since he's been the victim OF that bias.
Exactly 💯💯💯
Believe me I am experiencing this bias family court system right now and I’ve already dismantled a similarly biased report that was made against me by a clearly misandrist / feminist Cafcass worker who’s been seriously biased towards the psychotic fee male I had the misfortune of cohabiting with.
I’m following this case with eyes 👀 and ears 👂 wide open because I have a similar case.
@@onlythetruth596 good luck to you
@@rachelreneer56 thanks
Who'd have thought Amber Heard was the hero we all needed? She has done more than I could have imagined to highlight the criminal biases men face and the toxic entitlement so many women in this country have . This is like metoo inversed.
In the first testimony she said "can I read to refresh my recollection"
but in this one she said she is very good with recollection, everything she says changes each time she get asked a questions.
Wow!!! She’s lying for Amber. How convenient is that. She looked at the nurse’s notes and completely disregarded what was in the notes. BIASED as hell!!!
Omg. So Amber's personal nurse didn't note ANY injuries following all the things she claimed in Australia and various other places. Come on, this is clear as day. This Dr. has taken Amber's word for everything...
Yup, and then we got Amber proclaiming injuries up the wazoo.
She is taking the money. People pay her to testify
@@Skravla 100% agree... she was payd for her statement and i dont mean she was payd to lie... all i say is if she found out the opposite is the truth she wont get hired anymore to testify!!!
She was really quick to admit that men can be the victim of dv...did she at any point admit a woman can be the abuser? I think she just said when women hit men it's self defence and when a man's a victim its because he's gay and a man did it :s
Ye, she just reinforced that men can be victims, but apparently only to men.
Her constant focus on men being victims but women not being abusers, how the only cases of abuse against men she has dealt with has been man-on-man violence or child abuse speaks wonders. At no point did she suggest that a woman could ever abuse a man, which is most definitely possible.
Man on man, woman on woman. As in, men can be abused, women can be abusers.
The fact that she actually genuinely said this should be more than enough to draw a very concerning and sickening conclusion.
Even being gay, a woman can definitely abuse you, even if just for being gay (your own mother or sisters). What an "expert" lmfao.
Yeah she never said the case: woman abuser, man abused, only man vs man, woman vs woman, man vs woman ..
The fact that this woman has been testifying for years is terrifying to me.
I genuinely love your take on this, you're not constantly interrupting, but when you do it's with well thought out and accurate points with observations that I haven't heard from anyone else. Good job!
Honestly, as someone who doesn't give a shit about any of these people I can say without a doubt that the Doctor Johnny's team hired seemed MILES more competent than this Dr Amber's team hired. This woman here seems so unprofessional, lazy(not even filling out important documents correctly) and most importantly incompetent. I think any case she was involved with in the past might need to be looked over if her testimony had any sway over them because she is clearly biased towards men.
Biased against men ??
The other psychologist seemed balanced and calm. This one seems angry and defensive
@@GoldenLight22 yes, the other psychologist evaluated both of them, was calm, collected, said everything correctly, explained everything
This women? She doesn't even fill important documents right, she's super biased and didn't even do an evaluation with Jhonny Depp
She's so unprofessional and a joke
@@charzemc I think he means women
She said she filled out the paper herself that is crazy that never happens regardless of zoom meetings or not you let that individual fill out that pier review
That was brutal! "Not totally blind" "I've never met him" "Its reflected on my notes" WTF!!!
That's weird because in MY notes it says that I'm a 7ft Demi-god like Thor, and I own 20 mansions. Hm
@@Ssonelol hilarious 😂
@@Ssonelol 😂
@@Ssonelol 😂👏 I totally believe you!!! No need to see facts, its all truee
@@2rific_2 peer review is for losers anyway. When making diagnosis MY word is the ONLY word that matters.(sarcasm)
Anyone who has been personally affected by this psychologist can report her to the board so that their case can be investigated.
My husband spent 20 years in the military and we knew alot of people and traveled to alot of different places. Unfortunately we did see alot of domestic violence and was very surprised that there were alot of male victims. The problem being is with male its not reported. My husband had many calls during the night where he had to go to the house of one of his soldiers.
The two psychologists truly show the difference between someone that’s merely educated and someone’s that is passionate
The problem here is that the dr Karen has „real“ credibility and is on multiple boards , and helps to make big decisions, that is a huge problem. So education doesn’t mean shit if you misuse studies and bias cherry pick
THERE'S NO ROOM FOR PASSION IN MEDICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS - WITHOUT PROFESSIONAL OBJECTIVITY ANY TESTING IS RENDERED MOOT AND BECOMES COMPLETELY INVALID WHEN A SUPPOSEDLY IMPARTIAL OBSERVER AND EVALUATOR OF TEST RESULTS AND SCORES ALLOWS THEIR PERSONAL BIASES AND OPINIONS TO INFLUENCE THEIR ABILITY TO INTERPRET THE DATA!!
THIS SUPPOSED Dr. Huges ALWAYS REFERS TO ANY VICTIM OF IPV AS SHE AND 90% OR MORE PERCENT OF THE TIME THE ABUSER AS HE. THERE WASN'T A SINGLE CASE OF FEMALE - MALE IPV WHERE SHE IDENTIFIED THE MALE AS THE VICTIM!! THE ONLY TIMES SHE IDENTIFIED MALES AS VICTIMS OF IPV WAS IF IT WAS A CHILD OR MALE ON MALE VIOLENCE!! THE ONLY TIMES SHE IDENTIFIED FEMALES AS AGRESSORS OR INSTIGATORS OF VIOLENCE WAS IN SAME SEX RELATIONSHIPS WHERE IT WAS TWO WOMEN - ONLY THEN A WOMAN WAS IDENTIFIED AS THE PERPETRATOR OF THE VIOLENCE!! NOT ONCE IN ALL OF HER "HUNDREDS OF EVALUATIONS OF IPV" BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN DID SHE EVER SAY SHE IDENTIFIED THE WOMAN AS THE PERPETRATOR - THAT JUST ISN'T STATISTICAL POSSIBLE UNLESS THERE'S CLEAR BIAS FROM THE VERY BEGINNING BEFORE SHE'S EVER MET THE PARTIES!! IN THIS CASE SHE NEVER MET JOHNNY DEPP BUT TOOK EVERYTHING AMBER HEARD SAID AS THE GOSPEL, THEN TRIED AND CONVICTED JOHNNY DEPP OF EVERYTHING AMBER HEARD ACCUSED HIM OF DOING WITHOUT TALKING TO HIM, WITHOUT TRYING TO MEET HIM AND WITHOUT ANY SHRED OF REAL EVIDENCE!!
IMO EITHER SHE'S AN EGOMANIAC WHO'S INCAPABLE OF REALIZING THAT SHE'S SUBJECT TO BEING PLAYED AND IN THIS CASE HAS BEEN THOROUGHLY PLAYED AS A GULLIBLE FOOL OR SHE'S LOST HER WAY IN ADDITION TO THE FACT THAT SHE'S OBVIOUSLY LOST ANY PROFESSIONAL OBJECTIVITY AND NEEDS THERAPY HERSELF OR NEEDS TO STOP DOING THIS WORK UNDER FALSE PRETENSES!! I THINK SHE NEEDS TO BE REPORTED TO NY STATE'S BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LICENSING AND BE EVALUATED FOR COMPETENCY IN ALL OF THE FIELDS SHE'S CLAIMING EXPERTISE IN AND INCLUDING EVALUATIONS OF THE POWER POINT INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROSECUTORS AND LAWYERS IN HOW TO DEAL WITH VICTIMS OF IPV THAT SHE'S CO-AUTHORED!!
## NOT YELLING - ALL CAPS BECAUSE OF VISION ISSUE! ##
THIS SUPPOSED Dr. Hughes SAID THAT SHE'S LOOKING FOR DYNAMICS IN THIS RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JOHNNY DEPP AND AMBER HEARD WITHOUT EVER MEETING HIM OR SEEING THEM TOGETHER - THE LAWSUIT DOESN'T RAISE A HUGE RED FLAG AS MOTIVATION FOR AMBER HEARD TO SUDDENLY REACH OUT FOR SOMEONE TO ALL OF A SUDDEN SAY SEE THIS WAS WHAT HAPPENED - ONE TO TWO YEARS AFTER THE LAST INTIMATE - ONLY THE TWO OF THEM - INTERACTION BETWEEN
THEM! WHY THE OP ED WHEN SHE DID IT OTHER THAN TO BE ANOTHER ASSAULT ON JOHNNY DEPP? YET HE'D LEFT HER ALONE AFTER THEY GOT DIVORCED - WHO'S STILL ATTENTION SEEKING?? IT'S NOT JOHNNY!! HE JUST WANTS THE HORRIBLE WOMAN TO GO AWAY - AND LEAVE HIM ALONE!!!
## NOT YELLING - ALL CAPS BECAUSE OF VISION ISSUE! ##
Oh my god, this makes for perfect comedy. I mean, her talking in circles around the expert witness bit, only for them to present the PowerPoint... Its a perfect set up and punchline!
This entire case is a god damned dark comedy. Let me tell you, I know well a good scathing parody of a broken system when I see it, I'm Spanish, after all, 90% of our legendary authors based their careers on those genres (esperpento, picaresca, el quixote, etc) and boy, this is one of the best I've seen so far. It has all the drapings of such works of art. Background dark enough to make a man weep, a system so twisted and bent by years of false assumptions and poor practices that corruption is both blatant and treated as if it was expected, characters so inept and evil that you can't help but laugh every time they appear... It's all there. Takes me right back to my schoolyears reading those old books for literature class. Funny, didn't think an american court case would trigger my nostalgia.
@@thespanishinquisition4078 Well its sucks to be protagonist in such genres thats for sure.
@@basilhanas8453 Oh yeah... 99% of the time they wind up dead, too. Let's hope Johny is in the 1%
@@thespanishinquisition4078 This is nothing; in the Rittenhouse case, the prosecutor threatened the jury with a rifle!
@@berserkasaurusrex4233 Did he? I dont remember that. I remember him holding it like a moron and flagging everyone, but i dont remember him THREATENING the jury.
I love this lawyer ... he is straight out of suits I swear .. the dude needs to have his own show :v
She also never spent any time with JD and determined that he was the aggressor, based on just what AH said.
How the F can she come up with that outcome WITHOUT speaking to BOTH PARTIES?
The lawyer could object to her answer at any time, but he lets her ramble because he knows she is digging herself deeper and deeper into a hole lmao
It's a great move, because the more you make someone speak, the more chances for mistakes you open, and the easier it is to present a decisive blow.
Like the saying goes "Ain't no kill like overkill".
I loved the bit where he asked her why she was choosing to only believe testimony and evidence that supported amber heard and she literally had no answer
time stamp?
@@hildingvilding4618 36:55 I’m pretty sure
@@jurassic8597 yes! thank you it was driving me crazy trying to find it again
Damn, this lawyer is tearing her apart. He introduced her biases at the beginning and then thrown the bread crombs for the jury to "realize" that she's full of b.s.
damn this lawyer is good. That and this whole case is an absolute comedy act. It doesn't take much to see through the BS.
Can you think of how many men she's helped sentence, defraud, and just ruin the lives of, this is the shit that terrifies me.
The stuff of nightmares for all men. Any woman can accuse you of anything and you can lose everything to "experts" with prejudices.
This case was NEEDED for abused men everywhere!! So many woman think they can do and act however they want with no consequences and it’s disgusting!! Amber is an embarrassment to all woman especially woman who have actually suffered from domestic abuse!!! Sexist doctors like this are such a big part of the problem and should have their licenses pulled!!
God, it's clear that Amber's lawyers are coaching everybody to "talk to the jury" and "connect with the jury when answering questions."
It's super awkward how much both Amber and this lady talk at the jury.
Dude you make this whole process sooooo much more enjoyable! Thank you!
She has worked her whole life to get where she is to only destroy her reputation in a matter of hours and cause more damage to woman then anyone could ever imagine. Disgusting.
I find it concerning that she gets only 1 side and makes a conclusion based on that. I truly hope more is going to come out of this and her, her practise and previous hearings she had been involved in are investigated.
What reputation? She clearly hates men lmao she had a horrible rep to begin with.
money
Anything for some quick cash
You know, I actually question whether she destroyed her reputation. If anything this serves as an advertisement to lawyers that she will serve as an expert on your case if you're defending a guilty woman, you just need enough money. Maybe the clear bias outweighs the exposure she has received, I don't think it's simple to say her career is now ruined though. Perhaps if a few folks hound her past cases after the trial is over to get something done about it.
@@yerpderp6800
Yes, really she did pretty damn well considering what she had to work with.
She is obviously the strongest person on the defense.
Her relentless word-twisting and manipulation is truly sickening
Sentence that will ruin her: she read other opinions but disregarded them because she doesn’t agree. But the ones she agrees with are okay.
Exactly 💯💯
Amber: “Mom, he hit me, the turd time, he hit me hard”
Amber’s mum: “Okay hun, I’m still gonna tell the psychologist that I love him tho”
This lady is a professional witness and for the right price you can buy her testimony
This trial is the best thing to happen to equality.
Thank you Johnny Depp and the expert legal team.
This “Doctor” just flushed her career down the same toilet as Amber! Anyone else wanna get up and try to defend her??🤣🤣🤣
Excuse me sir, One such as Amber does not perform plebian actions like “flushing”.
She's certainly figured out how to make hundreds of thousands of dollars legally lying in court.
Which, despite being immoral and scummery, is impressive.
@@harveyflippers9531 straight to the bed sheets it goes
The pr team Amber Heard fired are so happy right now. Cuz they don't have to deal with her BS anymore. They probably got around the TV laughing at her
@@aennaenn7468 - It is impressive. Unfortunately for her, she defended the wrong one this time. Her “expertise” won’t hold water anymore. Lol
Interesting how she committed that many mistakes in court for someone who goes twice a year to court.
dude you are hilarious, I love the insights you get out of this case bro. Great content! I can't wait to watch her go down for ALL of this
I hope the jury has your insight and common sense...this entire case is sickening, the incompetence and corrupt legal team , Heard's criminality etc
If we are annoyed by how this case has been going down, then the jury is too.
Heard's team isn't corrupt, or at least nothing from this case says they are. It's Heard's right to get a fair defense, but the defense has nothing to defend her with which is Heard's fault not theirs. They are just doing their best. That being said, they are very rude.
Not corrupt, just incompetent.
@@ChickenKhorma not really nobody can defend amber turd in this situation tbh
@@ChickenKhorma more like not incompetence, just nothing to work with since Amber heard is guilty of beeing an abuser.
dude that lawyer from Depp's side LMAO is a fucking beast
He could’ve went harder on the cross, but he didnt and stayed respectful. Hope jury sees that comparison with heard’s team and how they grill witnesses disrespectfully
I'm a divorce lawyer and this is, in fact, a GREAT cross!!
That Lawyer Destroyed her with such poise and elegance
This entire trial process was hilarious to watch! I still return to it for the comedic relief of it is just too good! 😂
I love when someone is exactly who you thought they were.
Mrs heard isn’t writing now is she!
@@caramason5950 😁
She barely looks at the cross examiner but at the jury..? Like she is trying to pursuade the jury than tell any truths... OBJECTION get this liar out of court 😂
Her looking at the jury every 5 seconds like believe me im telling the truth 🤦♂️🤯
This is just what people do when they are experienced with testifying in court. You can tell when someone is inexperienced because they will look at the person who asked the question and ignore the jury when they give their answer.
You are supposed to look at the Jury. What are you smoking? LOL
barely*
@@nguyendi92 yea i know but when you go back to everyone was talking about JD thats he did not do it they are just looking at the lawyer even JD he never looked at the Jury they are telling the truth they dont need any sympathy but her and im sure AH gonna use the same tactics as this one sided lier
It’s so wild how she is answering while looking directly at the jury
"So you have only defended women?"
"No, I did defend men, but only in same sex relationships where there was no woman to back up, sadly."